Slashdot Mirror


Netcraft: Red Hat Still Top Linux Server Distro

darthcamaro writes "Looks like Red Hat is still the #1 distro according to Netcraft stats cited by Internetnews.com. Gentoo is now the fastest growing, replaced Debian which was the fastest growing distro just six months ago...and as we all know, and as the article rightly points out, the stats aren't accurate cause most webserver admins disable version reporting...right? So if all version were known, what would be the #1 distro for hosting? Read the Netcraft stats (without the context that they're BS) here"

24 of 315 comments (clear)

  1. I think part of it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That things like CPanel that are commonly used were up until recently only available on RedHat.

  2. BSD? by Coneasfast · · Score: 4, Informative

    i wonder what the BSD numbers would be like. anyone know where to get those stats? would be nice to see if all those 'bsd is dead/dying' arguments are right or wrong.

    --
    Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
    1. Re:BSD? by PacoTaco · · Score: 4, Informative

      FreeBSD has 2.5 million sites, about a million more than Red Hat (with the usual Netcraft caveats).

  3. Re:I guess that just proves it... by whfsdude · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wouldn't say BSD is dying. Look at Apple. Darwin is based on FreeBSD and you can't say that xserves are not selling.

  4. Whatever it is... by tbjw · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sure 2004 is the year of Linux on the Desktop!

    1. Re:Whatever it is... by M1FCJ · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Gentoo is fun to tinker with.

      On the other hand I'm sick of wasting time on tuning my OS. I want it to work, out of the box, 100% of the time. Redhat&Suse work fine for that matter. If I want to run something on an obsolete box, Slackware is good enough and still takes less time to install and configure.

      Gentoo is fun but it has no place on my servers and desktops. I have one image on a spare disk and when I'm in the mood, I can screw my system as much as I like.

  5. Come to Gentoo :) by rd4tech · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Gentoo, 6-month Growth Rate, 49.5%.
    Seems like we have the biggest growth rate...
    C'mon geeks, show some backbone, come to Gentoo, our precious...:)

    And it isn't even hard to install. When I was starting linux for the first time, without no previous experience, 1 year ago, following the manual up to the last slash*, it took me only 1 reformating and 2 days total. Nowdays, it's less than 24 hours on my P4, for the critical stuff, once KDE is up, the rest can follow safely. *Literary, the manual had a section where they didn't had an extra slash and that screwed me for half an hour:)

    1. Re:Come to Gentoo :) by foonf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When I was starting linux for the first time, without no previous experience, 1 year ago, following the manual up to the last slash*, it took me only 1 reformating and 2 days total. Nowdays, it's less than 24 hours on my P4, for the critical stuff

      To put that in perspective, it took me about two hours to install Slackware 3.3 on my totally obsolete 386SX when I started using Linux. That was installing off of a parallel port Zip drive on a machine with 4 megabytes of RAM. Even then, to install on that limited of a machine, you had to mount the root floppy directly rather than loading it into a ramdisk, and setup a swap partition before even being able to run the installer.

      24 hours to install on a shiny new Pentium 4 is NOT progress.

      --

      "(Man) tries to live his own life as if he were telling a story. But you have to choose: live or tell." --Sartre
    2. Re:Come to Gentoo :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Simplicity.

      Simply put, you in all likelyhood have no idea how Portage works. It's easy to use, yes. So is apt-get. Both are great from a user's perspective, but Slackware is not designed to be a user-friendly Linux like Mandrake or Suse. Slackware is an old-school, hacker distro. Gentoo claims to be a new-school hacker distro, that's development oriented, etc.

      However, there's nothing hacker friendly about Gentoo. While there's nothing wrong with the distro, it often seems like the loudest Gentoo proponents are the ones Slack and Debian users tell to shut up and rtfm on IRC. They can emerge apps and stuff, sure, and they feel all leet because they're compiling stuff. In actuality though, if Portage ever broke (or some dependency got fucked up) the vast majority of Gentoo users would be stuck. Not because they're stupid, though they might very well be :) but rather because portage isn't hacker friendly.

      Slackware is the distro you use if you want to really understand how Linux is put together but don't have time to do LFS. Gentoo users like to say that Gentoo is "automated LFS". But the automation completely removes the whole point of LFS, which is comprehension. Gentoo offers no comprehension.

      Hope this clears things up for you.

  6. Also Note: Cobalt Growth Increses After Opening... by weston · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's another netcraft article tying cobalt gains to opening the ROM source.

    Especially interesting in the context of the fact the product was discontinued.

  7. definately take with a grain of salt by XMichael · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lets see, NetCraft has successfully identified my exterior Linux Virtual Server boxes, RedHat; great. However they don't know that there are 90 systems running behind that LVS server, 20 of them are RedHat (as they were part of the origional deployment) the other 70 are Debian ... since the licensing change, we changed our corperate distro of choice.

    22 systems running RedHat 7.3 (All paid for)
    70 systems running Debian Woody (Company donated $6000) to the debian folks.

    All in all, netcraft see's two systems. Sweet.

    Priceless Photos

  8. Re:HAHAHA Gentoo by boudie · · Score: 4, Funny

    As a Gentoo user, it's nice to see that they have 1% of Linux's 1%. Sort of the fringe of the fringe.

  9. Red Hat internationally by davejenkins · · Score: 5, Informative

    Red Hat, as we all know, dominates the US market. SuSE used to have a strong hold on Germany, and I think momentum is taking them through that to some degree. Mandrake seems to have plucked the right strings with the French Govt (major buys lately) and they will see some domestic growth there.

    Asia is still wide open: Red Hat is the only real distro around, but their execution is leaving a lot to be desired. SuSE just isn't here, and Turbo, Miracle, Red Flag are such odd little operations that they cannot seem to gain any marketshare.

    I would think that the place things get interesting is where the race between IBM and HP in the developing world (Indonesia, Malaysia, Middle East, India) brings a linux with them. Increasingly, IBM is bringing SuSE with them, while HP signs deals with whatever local distro is the flavour of the day (Turbo in Japan and China, Red Flag in China, ? in Korea).

  10. More mportantly by JanneM · · Score: 5, Insightful

    More important in this piece is that all of them are growing in absolute terms, and growing quickly. 10-15% growth every six months is nothing to sneeze at. It would be interesting to see these figures for other OS:es.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  11. Re:Red Hat / Fedora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wait, I thought X was the windowing system!? God damn you linux, why must you be so confusing! screw you guys, I'm going back to windows.

  12. Probably still RH/Fedora... by Etcetera · · Score: 5, Interesting


    So if all versions were known, what would be the #1 distro for hosting?

    Probably still RedHat/Fedora. It's quick, easy to set up, well supported, has decent-to-good administration tools, and gives good Karma to both you and your boss.

    We use Fedora for both our dedicated servers (to be leased/rented to clients) and for internal use. We theoretically offer FreeBSD installs as well, but no one has ever taken us up on that offer (I wonder why)...

    RH's kickstart and anaconda features are godsends, the text-only and curses utilities are more than adequate when needed, and with Yum I know longer have to care about RPM dependancy hell.

    Gentoo? Give me my three days back, please.

    Debian? I suppose... but something smells "stagnant" to me and it's not just the water.

    *BSD? Too complex for most customers, and a headache I'd rather not have to deal with on our production machines. There's very little that the BSDs can offer me (for the time invested in learning all the "oddities" (from my perspective)) that's worth it for me to move over.

    Your mileage may vary, but mine stays pretty constant.

  13. [OT] What the FUCK is up with these apostrophes!? by JessLeah · · Score: 4, Funny
    NetCraft "see's" (sic) two systems?

    Excuse me, but just when in the fuck did it become chic to pepper language with inappropriate and meaningless apostrophes? Lately, I've seen apostrophes misused in:

    The infamous "it's" instead of "its" (to show possessive, as in "the animal defended its home"-- most people nowadays would write "the animal defended it's (sic) home", which means "the animal defended it is home", which makes no sense)

    Plurals ("sunglass'" (sic), "pizza's" (sic), etc.)

    At the end of "its" (bizarrely)-- i.e. its' (sic), which is not a word at all and probably never was

    ...And now, I see you using it as part of a verb. "See's"? WTF up with that? "See is"?

    God, am I getting fucking sick of idiocy like this. Why the fuck do I even bother writing proper English any more, when even relatively intelligent people like you mangle the language like cheese through a grater? And if you're from a non-English-speaking nation: I apologize. Actually, you're probably American, since the WORST and MOST BIZARRE manglings of English seem to originate from America, and in fact from people born in America, who have been learning English all their lives. Go figure.

    Anyhow, I'm fucking sick of this. Who the fuck started this "when in doubt, throw apostrophes at it" shit?

  14. And in other news... by JessLeah · · Score: 4, Funny

    Windows still top desktop distro.

    All this proves is that the old maxim "there's no accounting for taste" is truly universal in its applicability. ;)

  15. Re:[OT] What the FUCK is up with these apostrophes by TheShadowHawk · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think you just need a hug mate.

    :)
    --
    Friends don't let Friends use Internet Explorer.
  16. "Gentoo is now the fastest growing" ... uh, no by chunderfest · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Gentoo went from 0.7% to 1.0% share. SuSE went from 10.9% to 11.8%. i.e. SuSE's market share grew 3X as much as Gentoo's did.

    Don't be fooled by that last column. It's pretty much meaningless to compare the ratio "july/jan" for each distro; it's the tiny "jan" value for Gentoo what makes its "6-month Growth Rate" look impressive, which it's not (looked at on a number-of-installations basis).

    Basically RH lost a %, SuSE gained one, some others gained fractions of a %. Nothing terribly interesting.

    --
    Ah, bitter dregs.
  17. Netcraft confirms - RedHat is DYING by melted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sorry, I couldn't resist.

  18. Re:[OT] What the FUCK is up with these apostrophes by jebiester · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think you missed an apostrophe's in there somewhere

  19. And how would they determine distro? by bigberk · · Score: 5, Informative

    Linux is the kernel, and the TCP/IP stack is in the kernel. So you can't tell from a TCP/IP connection whether a host is running Redhat, Slackware or Debian.

    What the survey site is probably doing is looking at information tags within the Server: field of the HTTP response headers. Redhat does advertise itself there in the vendor-supplied Apache packages, but some other distros don't. Slackware's Apache packages will return nothing more descriptive than 'Unix' in the Server string.

    So not all distros will reveal themselves, and anybody can easily prevent this information from being shown period with a simple Apache configuration directive. I think that's a good idea to do on your own servers, by the way. Give attackers the least info possible at your setup.

  20. everything is relative by muyuubyou · · Score: 5, Insightful
    HermanAB wrote:
    According to IBM's figures, there are 30 million Linux systems, of which 23 million are desktops and 7 million servers, plus more than a billion embedded devices. So in total, there are probably way more Linux than Windows machines out there.
    to which Feztaa replied:
    Wow, what are your sources on that? It's been my impression that linux has been massively popular on servers, but is just now making inroads on the desktop. I'd be very surprised if linux was 3x as popular on the desktop as it is on the server.

    Only a problem with that: 23 million desktops is by no means 3x as popular as 7 million servers. Considering the ammount of servers and desktops out there, 7 million servers is very popular while 23 million desktop is very unpopular. For servers, we've been there for a while. For desktops, we're definitely not there yet.