Slashdot Mirror


Xbox Live Hits One Million Users

Thanks to Reuters for its news story revealing Microsoft's Xbox Live online service has reached one million users, additionally noting that "...more than 100 game titles can be played over Xbox Live, and it expects to see about 150 titles by the end of this year." The story also reports on some comparisons: "Microsoft said in a statement that it reached the 1 million mark for Xbox Live users three times faster than other subscription services, such as Time Warner Inc.'s AOL and TiVo Inc." This impending milestone was previously mentioned in an interview with Microsoft's Andre Vrignaud last month.

63 comments

  1. Its easy and fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    XBOX Live is a highly enjoyable service. Very easy to set up and use. Lots of good games. This is the future of gaming. Congrats gamers.

    1. Re:Its easy and fun by Ayaress · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Easy, yes. But personally, I don't find it much fun. Penny-Arcade hit the nail on the head when they said that the people you meet on Xbox Live are complete and utter cockmongers.

      It's no better on any of the online PC games I play online, but the microphone makes it ten times worse. Give an idiot a microphone, and they invent entirely new ways to be stupid.

    2. Re:Its easy and fun by bigman2003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Simple answer- host your own games, and kick the cockmongers.

      After a few rounds, the 'normal' gamers will stick with you, and all the losers will go elsewhere. Soon you'll find that you have a group of 16 fun people playing games together. Losers usually leave quick when they find out that their 'childish antics' aren't appreciated...especially if the host doesn't have a problem kicking them.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    3. Re:Its easy and fun by August_zero · · Score: 1

      I have had X-box live since launch

      I have not used X-box live in over 3 months, the last time I did use it was to download the KOTOR add-on which I needed since my original X-box died and I needed the patch again. I am still waiting for something enjoyable to play besides FPS and sports/racing. FS Warrior and Splinter Cell just don't do it for me.

      Not that the service is bad or anything, I have little doubt that I will use it for something eventually but for now Its just a $50 a year money sink for me.

      --
      On Wall Street they say "buy low, sell high" On the pad we say, "buy high, sell high" Isn't that somehow better?
    4. Re:Its easy and fun by Ayaress · · Score: 1

      I did that for a while, but eventually it wasn't worth it. I'd usually kick nearly everybody out of the game, and it would be me and a guy who lives a block away hoping somebody would come in and not announce to the world how high he was, how big of a dump he'd just taken, or how big his penis was. We decided to stop spending money on Xbox Live and just go back to having lan parties.

    5. Re:Its easy and fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do I have the feeling you are lying your teeth out to defend your point? Oh.. because no one else has had to resort to quitting xbox live and go back to lan parties including the penny-arcade crew thats why.

      Of course lan parties are better you are playing with your friends guys you know and trust, but lan parties take planning equipment and time to do, xbox live is always on even 2 am in the morning when you get insomnia after a hard day work. (try pulling a lan party at THAT time)

      If you have so much trouble with the dorks that show up from time to time play a different game (splinter cell per example) or just turn off the mic off is right there in the options Or act like a jerk yourself in defense (is called self defense jerking and is legal in several states) for a while, its just a game! not everyone feels like playing their soldier/pilot roles 24/7. Socialize a little man!

      Anyway Ive been on and off online play and I havent found "dorks" that could convince me to dump $50 I expent in online play plus what I have expent in online equipment. Actually what I have found is several guys that are more skilled than me and are willing to share their expertise and guys that are less skilled and I can share with, lucky me I guess.

      However Im beginning to doubt you even have an xbox or xbox live. you just have mentioned what they criticize at penny arcade what have they said or done TO YOU in xbox live?

    6. Re:Its easy and fun by FriedTurkey · · Score: 1

      They should rid the online world of microphones. I turn it off during counter-strike. 99.99% of what is said has nothing to do with the game. Can't understand what they say in that high pitch pre-puberty speech anyway.

    7. Re:Its easy and fun by MBraynard · · Score: 1

      Agreed. And I know absolutly no one who has lan parties. I'm not saying the don't happen, just not in my circle of friends/colleagues. XBL is perfect for me and it is also an easy way to stay in touch with my brother who is also on XBL. See, we can't have a lan party if he is 600 miles away, but we can team up for a game of Ghost Recon or Halo 2.

  2. To MS by SilentChris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Congratulations. No, seriously. Mainstreaming online gaming is anything but a small feat. I have Xbox Live (along with PS2 online and play PC games online) and aside from Blizzard games, Xbox Live commands my most online gaming attention.

    P.S. Don't screw this up.

    1. Re:To MS by fondue · · Score: 1

      Two years (approx.) and tens of millions of dollars of marketing to reach 1m subscribers worldwide?

      That's an interesting definition of 'mainstream'.

      --

      Preferences > Homepage > Customize stories on homepage > Authors > Zonk > Uncheck

    2. Re:To MS by KamuZ · · Score: 1

      I agree with that... but i can't see it like a waste of money, first of all, X-Box have a part on the console market, which is really something, of course, with that kind of money they really had their chance and they use it.

      On the other hand, we can say that Microsoft now have a community, they have 1 million people personal info, and they can make with that profiles what they want... migrate to X-Box 2? offers? contests? i mean, they have a big database and they can exploit it (and we know microsoft know how to do that)

      Personally, i don't like Microsoft products, but on the console market they are doing some new things which is great, because now Nintendo and Sony will catch up and try to smash them, some nice competence doesn't hurt at all, we are going to benefit from that, unless one of this companies do something really great that monopolize the console market...

      just my two cents

  3. Goals? by KDR_11k · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm not sure, but weren't they supposed to have reached that goal half a year (or something like that) ago already?

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    1. Re:Goals? by SilentChris · · Score: 1, Informative

      Several months delayed. Although, the same could be said about iTunes. Predictions are never reliable.

  4. If this is true by superpulpsicle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If this is true and not some M$ marketing BS, I'd seriously give them credit. Console online gaming is in need of some fuel for development.

  5. I wonder by LennyDotCom · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How many of those accounts were paid for and not included free with an xbox promotion Like the 3 1 year accounts that my family is using and won't be renewed when they expire.

    --
    http://Lenny.com
    1. Re:I wonder by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Because they're free-for-1-year accounts and renewingthem would cost money?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    2. Re:I wonder by LennyDotCom · · Score: 1

      Yes because they cost money and because we only got the xboxs to play rainbow 6

      --
      http://Lenny.com
    3. Re:I wonder by chrismcdirty · · Score: 0, Troll

      Probably for the same reason I didn't renew my free "subscription" to MSN -- because the store would not let me walk out with my laptop without it.

      --
      It's like sex, except I'm having it!
    4. Re:I wonder by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Good point, bu this is about more than just money, it's about building an online community, and by all accounts they've done that very well. As Gabe from Penny-Arcade points out, it's a lot more user-friendly than Sony or Nintendo's offerings.

      Microsoft should definitely get the credit for doing the job right in the area that's going to matter most for console gaming: online play.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    5. Re:I wonder by AuMatar · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Having played online PC games for a while- I doubt this. THe community for games suck. 99% of the people playing are absolute morons, assholes, or just plain annoying. Which is why only a very small percentage of even PC gamers actually spend much time in online play. Most of those who do just play real life friends. Online console play is a gimmick, its not going to truely drive console development or sales. If it did, Xbox would be number 1, not struggling for third.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    6. Re:I wonder by bigman2003 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While there are certainly some morons, assholes and annoyances on Live, I think the percentage is actually a lot lower than with on-line PC games.

      Why?

      Because your gamertag stays with you- and the gamers run the servers.

      On a PC, if I want to be a jerk, I can run around like an ass, and piss people off. Tomorrow, I can come on with a different name, and attempt to be serious.

      On Live, people will start to know you as an ass, and avoid you. Changing your gamertag is difficult (unless of course they ask you to change it!)

      Also- most games on the PC are played on central servers. With Xbox Live, the games are hosted by one of the people playing the game. (Certain games like Rainbow Six 3 allow 'dedicated' servers, but that is a different story) So, the host has the ability to kick someone who is being a total ass.

      I know that when I host a game I try to have fun, and let people play the way they want to play. But, if someone starts killing their own team-mates, or making racist remarks, or TRYING to annoy other people, they'll be gone in a second.

      Hey, 9 year old kids can't help it, they're annoying- but it's not their fault, so what the hell, let them play. But some jerk out there who wants to scream into his mike the whole time, or call people stupid n&G^#r or something like that...that shit ends quick.

      From your post, it seems as though you've never played on Live. It *IS* different from playing on a PC- in most ways, a lot better. Give it a try before you just assume that it sucks.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    7. Re:I wonder by Ayaress · · Score: 1

      Playstation has online play too, and it's a big selling point. It has better onilne games, more online players. Even if its not quite as accessible, it's still usable enough for the average home idiot to use. If the PS2 didn't have online, then your point would hold more weight.

    8. Re:I wonder by bigman2003 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you're only playing Rainbow 6, then how could you NOT renew your Live subscription?

      Rainbow Six is one of the best, and the most popular Live games out right now. Every once in a while I try to play the single player campaign, and it usually takes 4 or 5 minutes before I quit that, and go back to some Team Survival.

      Crimson Skies is just about the same thing. The game is *ok* single player- until you start playing Live- then it gets REALLY good.

      Of course, maybe you are playing system link, and playing the cooperative missions. I guess that would be okay, but you are still playing against AI instead of the real thing.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    9. Re:I wonder by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      And what percentage of PS2 owners have PS2 online? An even smaller percent than MS. Lets face it, online just is not that big of a feature. The demand is only really there in the hardcore gamers market.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    10. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't because 99% of the gamers are fucktards, its because 99% of hosted games have 1 fucktard among the average 12 people in the game. I think if you ran the statistics you would find that there is only about a 40% fucktard saturation in the X-box live crowd leaving a good 60% of users safely outside of the idiot range

      The AC is the only true non-Karma whore

    11. Re:I wonder by AuMatar · · Score: 1, Troll

      I've played MMOs where changing your name requires months of work to get back to where you were. Changing an xbox tag would most likely just be a new subscription. And the MMO asshole percentage was no lower than in other games. And most PC games allow the game's host to kick an asshole.

      For the 9 year olds- I don't care about age, I do care about maturity. If you're mature,at any age, cool. If you aren't, I don't want to be around you in real life, I sure as hell don't want to be around you in a game. And unfortunately, the maturity level of online players is damn low.

      The fact is MS can try whatever they want to make it better, but people are people. They can't change the human demographics of their players. And a minor decrease in the number of annoyances isn't enough to make it worth it. Besides which- while I don't own Live myself (I do NOT give money to Microsoft, I do not own an Xbox), I have played it at friend's places, and if anything the moron percentage was higher. My guess is its due to the younger average age of console gamers vs PC gamers.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    12. Re:I wonder by KeeperS · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Online play, the area that's going to matter most for console gaming? I certainly hope not.

      This may seem like blasphemy to much of the Slashdot crowd, but I don't think that online play is the be-all-end-all of console gaming or even PC gaming. It's a nice feature, but I'd rather have a rock solid single player experience or a great local multiplayer experience. Dealing with random asshats over the internet isn't very much fun.

      It's kind of interesting that there was a poll on GameFAQs about this recently. It's probably just as inaccurate as a Slashdot poll, but the gaming community seems sharply divided on how much weight online play has. It'd be even more interesting to see some real numbers on how many people actually play games online vs offline.

    13. Re:I wonder by fr0dicus · · Score: 1

      Divided still means certain groups want it. Unfortunately the "don't wants" (mostly Nintendo apologists it has to be said) seem to think it's all or nothing. Can't we all just have what we want?

    14. Re:I wonder by KeeperS · · Score: 1
      Agreed. It's clear that some people do want online play. Nintendo would be wise to listen to those customers. It's not like there's a shortage of multiplayer Gamecube games. And yeah, it wouldn't be as good as playing face to face with somebody, but it's better than nothing.

      I just don't think that online capabilities should be classified as the most important area of console gaming. Online play isn't worthless, but it's nowhere near the most important aspect of a game in my mind.

    15. Re:I wonder by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1
      99% of the people playing are absolute morons, assholes, or just plain annoying.

      Well yeah, but it's still a lot more fun jerking off by yourself!

      I'm lucky though, my PC game of choice right now is Enemy Territory and I've been lucky to find a server I can call home. We have a pretty good bunch (attitude-wise and ability-wise), and I've made a few good personal connections.

      So yeah, lots of idiots out there, but there's plenty of people who just want a nice clean game, you just have to put a little time and effort into finding them. Once you do, stick to them like glue.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    16. Re:I wonder by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1
      but I don't think that online play is the be-all-end-all of console gaming or even PC gaming.

      No, you're right, it shouldn't be. A well-designed game should stand on its own...

      I'd rather have a rock solid single player experience or a great local multiplayer experience

      ...but Multiplayer is much more fun, and, for me at least, setting up local LAN games is very difficult, so online multiplayer is the way for me to go on the PC (no Xbox live for me, sadly.)

      As I mentioned in a reply just above, there are plenty of non-asshole gamers out there, you just have to find them. Thankfully I have, and I spend very little time dealing with them and more time just having fun.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    17. Re:I wonder by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1
      mostly Nintendo apologists it has to be said

      Which is kind of funny when you consider that the original Nintendo, in Japan, had a modem attachment and an online service.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  6. how many by glimmy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    how many people own an x box compared to hoy many people use xbox live, if i had an x box id hack it for the linux os

    1. Re:how many by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an Xbox. I subscriber to Live. Haven't used it in 9 months. Not renewing next month.

    2. Re:how many by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Insightful? Sheesh...might as well change it to (Score:2, Mentions Linux)

  7. Wow, what bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The post - "Ballmer - Xbox 'Can Take Sony' In Next Generation" gets hundreds of posts claiming that MS is dreaming, and that it's impossible, yet a news story that is undeniably positive towards MS everyone ignores... Congrats MS, thanks for bringing online console game to the masses.

    1. Re:Wow, what bias by unclethursday · · Score: 1
      Congrats MS, thanks for bringing online console game to the masses.

      Excpet that Sony hit the 1 million online consoles mark a little less than a year before, and Sega had more subscribers to Sega.NET in the same amount of time that Xbox Live has been out.

      Whoops, guess MS didn't bring online console gaming to the masses, then.

      And we don't know how far those numbers will drop over the next few months as people with their free 2-3 month trials don't renew.

  8. figures as in? by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1 million people, accounts, IPs logged or what?

    Theres so many different ways to measure this.

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:figures as in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You pay to use it. It is not free. 1 million paid accounts.

    2. Re:figures as in? by unclethursday · · Score: 1
      1 million paid accounts.

      Sure about that? Plenty of free 2-3 month trial accounts out there, and not every one of them will renew. IE they won't pay.

      Only a fool would assume MS isn't including all the current free trial members in with this statistic... that means they don't necessarily have 1 million fully paid accounts, just 1 million active accounts right now..

  9. not free then not going to pay by jeremywjones.com · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think online gaming is great. I used the free xbox live that came with it, but thats it. I am not going to pay $50 for a game and monthly fees just to play with others. I think the game prices should cover the fees of xbox live.

    1. Re:not free then not going to pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you understand the fee for xbox live is 50 bucks a year?

    2. Re:not free then not going to pay by bigman2003 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's fine, and I'm not going to argue with you, and say you're dumb, or anything like that.

      But, over the past 2 years I bought about 40 Xbox games. Most of them I've traded in, or given away after being finished with them.

      The only exceptions are Xbox Live games.

      Crimson Skies, Rainbow Six, Top Spin, Mechassualt...these are games that I can keep putting in to my Xbox, because there is always something new (different opponents). I'll probably hang onto these games until the next Xbox comes out, because it's just fun to play against other people.

      Each of the games I mentioned (and other Live games that I can't think of right now) have had their playing hours tripled, quadrupled, or increase 10-20 times because of Live.

      So is it worth $50 a year to take Crimson Skies from a 10-15 hour game, to a 150 hour game?

      Yes...it is for me. And don't forget downloadable content. Splinter Cell, Armed & Dangerous, and many others have downloadable missions that make the original game much more valuable.

      So, if you don't think that $4.17/month is worth it, that's okay. But for me, that $4.17 constitutes about half of my gaming (on Live). So I think it's a great value.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    3. Re:not free then not going to pay by VividU · · Score: 1

      At $50/yr it comes out to about 1 dime and 1 nickel per day to play online as much as you want, whenever you want.

    4. Re:not free then not going to pay by jeremywjones.com · · Score: 1

      I am not saying that it is not a good deal for $50. But when there are online games for PC that are just as enjoyable that are free then thats what I am going to do. Plus the graphics on my PC is better then my xbox. I just think that there should be a solution to offer it for free. I still play both pc and xbox games. But for online play I always stick with PC.

    5. Re:not free then not going to pay by Sysgen · · Score: 1

      That 15 cents a day gets you downloadable content, a closed network that does not allow cheating (see SOCOM on the PS2), a gamertag that follows you everywhere, friends list with 100 entries, voice chat, voice messaging and very soon video conferencing. Oh you also get to play online games :) Me thinks good value. We have 2 accounts :)

  10. Re:I'm not a fan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ---I'm not a fan of MS, i know lots of people with Xbox, I don't think the graphics are that great on an Xbox, i think if you have a $20 graphics card, you'll have better graphics than xbox.--- Now, not quite a $20 dollar video card, but I agree. HOWEVER do remember that the Xbox is few YEARS old, & it didn't even use the best tech then... ---I'm a big fan of using a mouse for computer games, it provides realtime aiming in FPS games. on an xbox or PS2 you need to hold the joystick for an hour, just to turn around to shoot the guy behind you.--- Now what does this have to do with XBL? Besides, how is that MS's fault that you don't like the idea of using a controller for a FPS ---Think of it as $50,000,000 a year for Micro$oft.--- Sure, minus server cost, bandwith, employee cost, advertising, developement, etc. Hey, I've got an idea, keep playing FPS's with a mouse on your $20.00 video card, and SHUT UP. Anti-MS bias is crap, you're all just buying into the classist hype. Keep it up, your just making the government happy.

  11. In other news, by Inoshiro · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nintendo is now up to 3 online games for the GameCube! You have a stunning array of choices, as long as you choose Phantasy Star Online Eps 1 and 2, Phantasy Star Online 3, or Phantasy Star Online Eps 1 and 2 plus!

    This is why I have both a GameCube and an Xbox. Nintendo may make great games, but they sure as hell don't know how to establish a presence in a market that's fairly large and enjoyable.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  12. Re:I'm not a fan by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

    on an xbox or PS2 you need to hold the joystick for an hour, just to turn around to shoot the guy behind you.

    Try adjusting the joystick sensitivity- you're playing in 'dummy mode'.

    But then again, if you didn't know that, maybe you were in the right place.

    ** Rainbow Six: 3 has adjustments from 1-10, with 3 being the default. Try putting it on 6 or 7 and see how much faster you aim.

    --
    No reason to lie.
  13. Free Alternative by Inda · · Score: 2, Informative

    XBConnect

    Support for 50 games.

    I don't pretend to understand the technology; I plugged a crossover cable between the XBOX and PC, installed the client on my PC and it just worked. Neat.

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    1. Re:Free Alternative by jeremywjones.com · · Score: 1

      I havn't heard anything about this before. Thanks for the URL. I am going to try this out.

    2. Re:Free Alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.gamersinternettunnel.com/ works too. In fact, it works for just about all games, console or PC, and even lots of non-game things!

  14. " Xbox Live Hits One Million Users" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    OUCH! That must've hurt.

  15. Re:I'm not a fan by Ayaress · · Score: 1

    on an xbox or PS2 you need to hold the joystick for an hour, just to turn around to shoot the guy behind you

    I think your stick is broken. If you mess with the sensitivity, the response is just as fast as a mouse. Not as accurate, granted, but just as fast.

  16. hoo ah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So to celebrate they are releasing XBox 2 next year! Good luck Xbox Livers.

    "All your IPs are belong to Microsoft"

  17. Dammit by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 0

    I meant to say more fun than jerking off by yourself...

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  18. Re:I'm not a fan by DuctTape4Windows · · Score: 0

    i don't own an xbox or a PS2! not mine to mess around with!

  19. Xbox Live Hits One Million Users by scrytch · · Score: 1

    One Million Users heard to say: "ouch"

    thankyaverymuch...

    --
    I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  20. Re:I'm not a fan by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

    It's usually part of the player set-up...like whether or not you want the joysticks to be inverted, or not. Not something that requires a screwdriver, or something like that.

    --
    No reason to lie.
  21. dubious statement by St.+Arbirix · · Score: 1

    Microsoft said in a statement that it reached the 1 million mark for Xbox Live users three times faster than other subscription services, such as Time Warner Inc.'s AOL and TiVo Inc.

    Does an XBox live account count for the box or is it seperate for each controller? If it's just for the box then perhaps they counted accounts and multiplied by 4.

    --Matthew

    --
    Direct away from face when opening.
    1. Re:dubious statement by Peteloaf · · Score: 1

      A Live account is subscription based, not controller based. As in you have to register to be listed as having an account. When MS says one million live subscribers, that means one million accounts, not one million players.