Slashdot Mirror


eBay Running Trial for Downloadable Music

supersandra writes "Looks like eBay has been inspired by all those millions of iTunes song sales. They're running a six-month test offering downloadable music through authorized sellers, who would have to 'ensure copyright protection for the content and meet service-level agreements.' Also of note, 'music buyers won't be allowed to resell the files on eBay.'"

9 of 165 comments (clear)

  1. Yay! more DRM'ed goodness. Yay! by RLiegh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, I would never pay for DRM-encrusted windows-only music files; and I don't get why it has taken off as much as it has.

    If you want my money, either give me unemcumbered files; or (if you're an online station) give me a large selection of music that I can pick and choose what individual songs are being streamed to me. Launchcast has a great selection; but if there's a way to pick and choose what you want to hear (instead of "well, you like the ramones, have some greenday") I'll be damned if I can figure out what it is.

  2. What they should do by mfh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here's what Ebay should do: take mp3.com's formula for indy music and tweak it; auction off download rates for each artist by the number of songs sold, and start with $0 per song, then start slowly charging more and more until the song reaches a cap of say $1.50 USD that goes directly to the artist. Calculate the popularity of the song by the number of purchases, and raise/lower the cost for the audience. This would be a really good model to make money. I would likely forget about selling RIAA titles because they all sound the same to me, per genre. Indy music is the way to go for me.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  3. Non-traditional sales by unboring · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What's interesting to see is that eBay is moving away from "traditional" items and auctions. Now that they're into "Digital Downloads". This promises to be a big headache to maintain though, with eBay already facing so many phishing and spoofing attacks. Do they really want to deal with DRM, RIAA and enforcing legitimate music sales?

    Another way of looking at this is that now if I'm a music seller, but want to also buy some music, I'll need to register for another accounts. This is sure to boost the number of registered site users (>100 million IIRC), and will keep the marketing drones happy!

  4. Good for independent artists by unboring · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This would be a great way for independent musicians to sell their music directly to their fans, without giving a "slice of the pie" to the RIAA. At least now, they can be assured of getting a majority of the sale proceeds.

  5. Logical impossibility by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They're running a six-month test offering downloadable music through authorized sellers, who would have to 'ensure copyright protection for the content and meet service-level agreements.'

    Well, since foolproof DRM is an impossibility...I take that to mean that they have no music for sale.

    Also of note, 'music buyers won't be allowed to resell the files on eBay.'

    ...because they wouldn't be able to sell any in the first place under their DRM terms. QED. ;^)

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  6. This is Crap by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Insightful
    First of all - if it is a digital download, shouldn't it be a Dutch Auction (with infinite 'items'). 2nd - Why is there 6+ days to go? A download sale depends on impulse, not the best deal. I can go to iTunes and preview, buy, and listen in the space of a couple of minutes for the same price as this one 6+days from now.

    3rd - "sellers chosen for the pilot have to ensure copyright protection for the content and meet service-level agreements." If I wrote it, it's got copyright protection. That's what copyright does - protects my work when I create it. Or are they talking about some DRM scheme? It's not clear.

    4th- If DRM is required, how does it get put on? Will someone send me a Windows-Only exe to screw with my track? Do I have to send a wav somewhere? Again not clear.

    Ebay. Stick with what you do. Leave the failing at a Digital Music Store to everyone else.

  7. Uphill Battle by ZeroGee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This will be an uphill battle. I-tunes is the dominant e-music source due to the interoperability with the Ipods. The Ipods truly are the "Sony Walkmans" of the 21st century -- their interface is great, and I dare any detractors to try it for a week first before disparaging it. The fact that the Ipods tie in so closely with I-tunes is the reason why I-tunes is successful -- not the other way around. Simply branding a music store "E-Bay" without hardware to back it up will fail miserably, unless their DRM was far more favorable than Apple's (i.e. can burn it unlimited times).

  8. Sigh. Get it for free. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Um. Great business plan.

    Isn't this like what SCO does? Tries to sell something that is given away somewhere else?

  9. This is all really very straightforward... by mbessey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Assuming Joe Seller has copied the CD, under fair use, can he keep his copy when he sells the original?"

    No. Copyright law allows you to make copies *of recordings you own* for your own use. If you sell the original, then by definition, you don't own it any more, and therefore have no right to create or keep copies of it.

    "What If someone steals my physical CD but I still have my high-quality MP3 on my player? Did my right to the MP3 get stolen too?"

    No, again. You still "own" that CD, even if it's not still in your possession. That's what makes the copy the thief has "stolen". So, you still have a right to create and keep copies of the CD. Now, being able to prove that you have the right to that copy is going to be pretty hard if you don't have any evidence that you bought the CD.

    -Mark