Africa Enters Global Market For IT Outsourcing
nusratt writes "MarketWatch reports that many organizations 'are moving away from India as the place to outsource, because of the labor churn, and Africa supplies the highest rate of return on investments. New York's parking ticket system is managed from Ghana, Nigeria has an entire ministry for ICT, and Mauritius is building its own CyberCity. Gartner predicts that up to 25 percent of IT jobs today will be moved to emerging markets by 2010'."
Would you trust any sensitive customer data in Nigeria? Im not being racist, just that they dont exactly have a glowing track record.
Oh yes this is the country you want to trust for your outsourcing needs. "Thank you for calling Dell,.... Well sir I think I know how we can fix your computer problem, you see my uncle Prince Zambar the great had $434,000,000 (FOUR HUNDRED AND THIRTY FOUR BILLION DOLLARS) yadda yadda yadda."
Everyone that disagrees with me is a paid shill
And as it so happens the Nigerian ministry of ICT has developed a product for the US Department of Homeland Security. Problem is, that the DHS can only contract out to a US based company or individual. Seeing as this contract is worth 480 MILLION DOLLARS, they will be glad to give you 10% of that, if you were to act as an intermediary.. There are just a feeeew formalities to be handled, like, oh, a Nigerian ICT business license, and this thing called a Remmitance Fee. Honest truth. They e-mailed me about it just yesterday.
SCO employee? Check out the bounty
Nigeria is like the internet scam capital of the world they lack the legal infrastructure to be a trustworthy place to do business.
Thats not to say they couldnt turn it around...but its going to take a lot of work.
It's not super in depth, but over at cio.com they have interactive maps comparing different parts of the world for outsourcing.
Yeah, i'm glad money is flowing into Nigeria, as i am about to complete a transaction with a Nigerian prince that will settle my money problems for good. I laugh at thee.
"If God created us in his own image we have more than reciprocated." - Voltaire
Really now. India and Taiwan I can imagine as good sources for cheap labour. Stable and growing economies backed by a stable enough political systems. Now about most of Africa then? Only the countries at the northern most end and the southern most end ( Morocco, Libya, Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt and South-Africa. ) are anywhere near stable. The countries in the middle are plagued by atrocious economies that can't support anything, absolute lack of anything after YEARS of prolonged warfare and famine, no political stability whatsoever and plenty of tribal conflicts to boot.
I would think twice of investing resources in a country where the next day you might have to deal with 50k refugees from your neighbor camping on your grounds, the local fundamentalist warlord taking over control of the country and/or a tribal warfare because you've employed someone from tribe Z which pissed of tribes A to Y.
Hate me!
FYI The the nation that produces the most spam is the Good Ole USA. Just because this scam is popular in Nigera dosn't mean that most nigerian's are scam artists. A couple of months ago over 500 scammers were arrested. Of course slashdot decided not to publish the story.
autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
What this leads to over time is people in these third-world countries, as well as the people who are hiring them from around the world, gradually having a better life than they did before.
As one country develops to the point where it's workers are efficient enough to be able to charge more for labor-intensive work like a call center, they move on to higher-paid work and the call center work gets moved to yet another country.
You don't pay a backhoe operator to dig ditches by hand when you have a backhoe handy and it's not because you want to keep from paying the backhoe operator too much.
There is a reason for this, it's called comparative efficiency and it's why trade between individuals exists in the first place.
What you are missing is that in order to "outsource" work to any country, a company must pay the people who work there more than they were being paid already, otherwise they wouldn't work for them, would they?
The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
Seriously, if the labour is as skilled, what's the justification for keeping the labour in the 1st world? Moral crusading on the idea that this would only be justified if the outsourced workers were paid an identical wage falls flat on its face; "victims" of outsourcing would be identically as pissed as they are now as they're having wages undercut. We're going to have to admit sooner or later that your average African or Indian brain can process the simplicity of IT work as well as your average Euro-American IT worker. If you ask me, offshore workers still have a very large hurdle to jump in order to become as useful in processing IT labour: predominant mastery of major lingua francas.
I read an interesting article the other day. This article was describing Canada as a great place for the U.S. to outsource its jobs, because:
...
1. same time zone
2. same language
3. similar work ethics and culture
4. lower wages
5. highly educated
6. geographically closer
Makes sense, eh?
Simpy
In this tested and failed system, multinational corporations no longer need to pay training costs for their workforce. Governments also compete by subsidizing infrastructure - and sometimes by direct cash subsidies too.
God forbid we actually train Africans in IT so that they could deal solve their own economic challenges.
Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
Oh yes, offshore outsourcing is going to be huge! Oh and by the way, we do have our own offshore outsourcing consullting services!
Not saying they are wrong, but you just gotta wonder if they may have alterior motives....
I read about that "500 scammer arrest" here on slasherdot. Not sure-don't recall- if it was a standalone article or a reference in a subthread though, but defintely it was here.
My bottom line as a past identity theft victim is, I don't trust anyone or anyplace with my info now, although you are forced to provide it in some cases. I now use cash as much as possible, don't have an ebay or paypal, etc, account,never use them, don't pay any bills online, and tend to use postal money orders a lot for buying things "remotely", and even then, only if it's impossible to find or order what I want locally in a brick and mortar store. Yes, it's limiting, but still doable in our society, but it gets increasingly hard to do. It seems every business out there wants all your info, and nowadays every other website wants your info just to look at the website. Screw it. I love the *theory* of the internet, and I use it up to what my personal-choice limits will allow now, but the *practice* of the internet as regards any sort of rational "security" is a 50/50 crapshoot near as I can see as soon as "money" is involved in any manner. If your software isn't insecure, then the humans at the other end might be insecure.
Reasons why India is better to Invest:
,Mumbai Hyderabad ,Chennai there are other cities like pune,Ahmedabad , Coimbatore ,Mysore coming up big time to meet up the standards.upLittle towns have already become better.Villages are improving etc.Looks like workforce is improving
.Anyone who can bring big bucks to the family is hailed and treated like a hero.So English workforce is improving tremendously.India has 18 official languages.Jus imagine if People in US speak so many languages.Languages come with diverse culture,customs etc.And English is undoubtedly the uniting factor among diverse Indians.All Work is documented in English becuz most of them dont know many regional languages.
1.Upcoming Youth workForce:
I would like to remind everyone, that 50% of indian population is below 25 years of age and only 54% of popuation are literate.Slowly this is improving , people are imbibing english into their lifestyle more.After Bangalore, New Delhi
2.Upcoming alternative IT workforce:
Already there are overwhelming amount of indians whose undergrad major is mechanical or electrical or some other non comp-sci degree but still they are seduced for quick bucks in IT.Honestly if u have good aptitudde and some basics of programming, one can sustain in IT field with hardwork.I was thus saying there is an upcoming workforce there.
3.upcoming Quality English Workforce:
Importance of english is overstressed in schools.Indians watch a whole lot of English movies , listen to Music and its almost a status symbol if you are good with english.And besides , Nerds are the heroes in India.You would watch Indian heroes in movies are projected to have a strong academic background
4.Content with Salary
:
Most of the people with non comp sci majors who work in other areas earn half as comp sci workers.And if an IT employee asks for more money , that reform would not be easy cuz there are so many talented Indians wthout jobs stalking streets day and night to bring themselves and their families to a decent existence.Btw , The salaries provided to many IT people are very high already.They enjoy superior life style.The point is "Salary increase is minimal and would not be a burden to investros".So in the long run, they are stable and cheap.
I would still invest in India , cuz
1.Abundant and still latent talented English speaking IT workforce
2.Upcoming Quality of workforce
3.Democracy and approachable govt policies.
4.Already Established.
5.Investment cost is low and not likely to grow higher and would propagate to different unexplored places.
Sorry for the long Article , couldnt condense..
Hello , this is my way.
Which way is yours ?
btw there is no right way
The US standard of living is based on cosuming 60%of the worlds resources. So there is a problem bringing everybody up to that level.
If Gartner says it, It MUST BE TRUE (tm). Clowns.
The essence if stupidity is this - the more we "compete" with third world countries, the more we as a nation are going to lose. Third world countries don't have our living standards, our infrastructure, or many other opportunities we have worked for for so many years. They don't require benefits, which thanks to our broken healthcare industry (read insurance racket) eat up huge portions of company dollars. They don't require fair living wages, benefits, any kind of job security. So how do we compete globally? Do we push our standards into the toilet in order to accomodate corporate greed and government corruption?
We have two options - force our standard of living down to the early 1900s level in order to "compete" (what we are doing now), or have a US-based revolution that redefines America as a self-sustaining entity - reliance on our own farmers, manufacturing industry, service sectors, etc. In this mode, we refuse to give up the quality of life we have built for ourselves, and start requiring other countries to come to our level playing field if they wish to participate.
What amazes me is that with America's huge installed base of great programming and IT knowledge, there is no influx of jobs coming from the other direction.
Are we SO overpaid that our economy must first experience a massive depression in skills, education and fair wages in order to "compete" (artificially) with the rest of the world? Do other countries' people actually believe that somehow they won't experience the same problems and that they will all become rich and famous; their management won't outsource back to America if the wages are cheaper?
Say what you will about Unions, but my friends, America's Corporate Greed is ready and willing to exploit you, and teach your management the tricks of the trade. If you think we're overpaid over here, then check our statistics on labor at the department of labor and statistics url:BLS. Note that union workers on average get a few $ more per hour than non-union. And yet, people still believe they are evil. This is typical claptrap from businesses that don't wish to impact their profit margins in order to "compete". How soon we forget the awful abuse our parents and grandparents experienced at the hands of large business - and the need that created unions in the first place - it hasn't even been a hundred years.
Remember that everything over here costs a LOT MORE than in India or other countries, even if the vast majority of crap (and I do mean CRAP) we buy comes from China (hello, WalMart).
So, anyone care to speculate where the bottom is, and when we'll reach it?
Comment removed based on user account deletion
The fundamental problem is this:
The governments of these African countries, like the government of India before them, are in the process of subsidizing the development of what is perceived to be a cash cow of limitless milkability, IT. This process is nothing more and nothing less than seizing money at gunpoint from other, more productive domestic industry (natural resources development as one example) or getting it from dumber countries (like, say, the US and its billions of dollars of foreign aid, ironically likewise looted from the American taxpayer), and giving it to another industry to make it grow in defiance of market forces. Governments are subsidizing the production of millions of PhDs, handing out favors to "tech-savvy" "entrepreneurs" and foreign companies to take advantage of the perceived riches of the tech industry, not realizing a couple of very basic tenets of economics:
ALL OTHER THINGS BEING EQUAL, WHEN SUPPLY GOES UP, PROFITS (AND PRICES) GO DOWN.
and
IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO CIRCUMVENT MARKET FORCES. USING GOVERNMENT TO FORCE THE ISSUE LOOKS BETTER NOW, BUT COSTS MORE LATER.
The problem is, this is not an endless phenomenon. It wasn't profitable to locate things in India before, for a multitude of reasons (lack of infrastructure, lack of education, social problems, whatever). It will likewise be unprofitable in the future, when their millions of PhDs are hacking cabs in New Delhi to make rent, or becoming farmers. (You can see this process beginning now. The market there has reached capacity, and other places - like Africa, Land of Ceaseless Warfare, Spam, and Disease - are being seriously considered as places to invest in tech, because the market in India is getting too inflated.) It sure as hell has been unprofitable and/or just plain dumb to locate any form of tech industry capital in basically any African country, where the odds of its being nationalized, destroyed, or devalued in the customary and predictable political upheaval are astronomical.
The cornucopia of benefit from IT and tech in general is mostly illusory. It came about in the US largely through a government/Federal Reserve easy-credit policy in the 90s that allowed all manner of idiocy to get funding and look great on paper (AKA the dot-com boom - pets.com, anyone?), followed by the bust when all of these crappy investments based on bullshit were exposed as the stupid ideas that they were. Yes, there is some benefit to tech, as long as it enhances productivity and quality of life. No, its benefit on life and productivity are not infinite, nor is this benefit anywhere near as bountiful as some think. It seems that the governments of other countries, enthralled by the idea of a trillion-dollar business tax base (or "loot pond") springing up overnight with a minimum of effort, are going to go down this same road with precisely the same heartbreak at its end. The citizens of these countries would do better to leave their neighbors alone and spend their time farming and defending their property from invaders. After a few decades of respect of property rights and natural rights have set in, then they could begin working their way up the industrial/informational ladder, and would be in a much better positioin than we are now. (For that matter, we in the US should probably take the same advice.)
Oh well.
I am Chaos. I am alive, and I tell you that you are Free. -Eris