Slashdot Mirror


Tissot's MSN Direct SPOT Watch Reviewed

bargainPDA writes "Tissot, the Swiss watch maker, has released a new SPOT watch, complete with their famous touch screen technology , and featuring MSN Direct technology - there's a full review with detailed pictures over at SpotStop.com. The $725 watch goes beyond the entry-level geek, requiring a deep pair of pockets to purchase."

92 comments

  1. For $725... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I could buy 5 shares of Google. I think that's a better investment.

    1. Re:For $725... by Kenja · · Score: 2, Funny
      "I could buy 5 shares of Google. I think that's a better investment."

      But the watch could tell you right away when the Google stock tanks.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  2. OK, This Doesn't Make Sense by stevemm81 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You take a luxury item like a $725 Swiss watch with patented touch screen, and you pair it with... MSN?!?!?

    Sig semper tyrannis.

    1. Re:OK, This Doesn't Make Sense by swordboy · · Score: 1
      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    2. Re:OK, This Doesn't Make Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn acronyms.
      So what's MSN?

      Must be some thing from the past...

    3. Re:OK, This Doesn't Make Sense by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Who else are they supposed to partner with? The partner has to be a portal site. If you know of any that are substantially less lame than MSN, please share this information!

  3. Yes... by Pyro226 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... but does it tell time?

    (Sorry, had to be said.)

    --
    This message is encrypted with Quad ROT-13 to protect the author's copyright under the DMCA.
    1. Re:Yes... by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      Who cares if it can tell time!?!? That's what your computer's for!

    2. Re:Yes... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Funny
      but does it tell time?


      Yes However, it is a M$ service, so your watch will become useless unless it is patched and has regular upgrades to keep from catching the newest virus, the NTP clock worm.
      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:Yes... by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Yes However, it is a M$ service, so your watch will become useless unless it is patched and has regular upgrades to keep from catching the newest virus, the NTP clock worm."

      In stark contrast to the Linux based watch which requires that you edit a .CONF file to set the time.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just waiting for mine to give me the "grey screen of death" since it looks like it doesn't support the color blue. .. and what are they thinking .. did they really say "touch screen watch" I don't know about you but my fingers are too big unless it's screen is the size of my palm handheld. I think if anyone actually buys this thing .. they are beyond "geek" status .. I think I would just have to laugh at you..

    5. Re:Yes... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Apple has just announce the brand new iWatch, in various yummy colors. Newest version automatically adjusts clock to whatever time zone you are in. Prices start at $1499

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  4. MSN Direct technology? by Iesus_Christus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From looking at the links, it seems like MSN Direct is yet another way to get up-to-the-minute information. While I can see how this is useful in some circumstances, I'm also somewhat doubtful. Do you really need to know the exact second that the Yankees get a home run in a game you are too busy to watch by looking at your watch? Or, are you willing to pay $750 for this ability? Some people may find it useful, but the amount of information that is valuable to the average person in real time isn't all that big.

    1. Re:MSN Direct technology? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Some people may find it useful, but the amount of information that is valuable to the average person in real time isn't all that big.

      That's one reason to charge more for it...get it into the market of people who'd find it useful.

    2. Re:MSN Direct technology? by raquelita · · Score: 1

      Do you really need to know the exact second that the Yankees get a home run in a game you are too busy to watch by looking at your watch?

      In my country there is a site that offer a service like that. They send you an SMS when your favourite soccer team score in a game.
      You can't imagine how many people are suscribed to this service!
      There are thousands! Even Women :-)

      --
      Yes, I am a /.er girl http://raquelms-travel.blogspot.com
    3. Re:MSN Direct technology? by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1
      The only things I could think of wanting to know up-to-the-minute would be:

      • Stock prices (if I were day trading)
      • Weather (for when I commute)
      • Big news (it would have to be BIG for me to care, like 9/11 big)
      • traffic


      Would I ever pay $750 for this? Hell no. And this is coming from a guy who loves to buy expensive gadgets.

      However, another poster mentions to use a radio. Ehh, a radio will provide most of that info, but not when you want it, and maybe not to your area (like my zipcode or county).

      But, there's always going to be people with too much money and too little common sense lined up to buy stuff like this.
    4. Re:MSN Direct technology? by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      I've seen soccer tournaments before... I'm guessing they don't have to send too many SMS messages...

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  5. Is it as cool as the Pulsar? by lofi-rev · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder how long till it ends up here?

  6. $725 by afidel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    requires deep pockets??? My first PC cost $1500 without the printer and that was 1993 dollars. Hell my non-geeky watches usually cost me around $300 for a decent one. My GPS, altimiter, electronic compass one was closer to $500 and that doesn't include email =)

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:$725 by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For a watch whose big thrill function is that it connects to MSN? I wouldn't pay 72.50 for it.

      You could get a kickin PDA for that...hell the New HP only costs 280.00!

      Just doesn't seem worth it. Get a nice swiss dress watch, a sweet PDA, and a few grams of blow for the same price.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    2. Re:$725 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're paying too much.

      I never pay more than $10 for a watch.
      They last forever and keep perfect time.

      Good GPS shouldn't cost more than $100.

      I have some things I'd like to sell to you... /Mark

    3. Re:$725 by afidel · · Score: 1

      Yeah well since the GPS watch is lighter than any other GPS on the market and I was hiking in the Alps and the Andes I didn't mind spending a bit, plus it had the altimeter which is a very good way to know of an impending storm front. When you get into extreme mountaneering you get used to paying for good equipment, that equipment has saved my life on more than one occasion so it was worth every penny.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:$725 by mrwonton · · Score: 1

      Ahh, theres just something about a post recommending you to buy cocain being modded insightful that makes me love /.

      --
      Not more than you need, just more than you want
    5. Re:$725 by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      I was going to say, "A new PDA, A nice swiss watch, a few ounces of blow, and a hooker off whose ass to snort it, all for the same price" but I thought that would be over the top.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    6. Re:$725 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For a watch whose big thrill function is that it connects to MSN? I wouldn't pay 72.50 for it.

      Offer me a watch running MS software as a gift. Your money is safe; I wouldn't take it.

      This could be the beginning of the end of the Swiss watch industry's reputation for quality and reliability.

    7. Re:$725 by mrwonton · · Score: 1

      Over the top? Nah. That would have been modded informative! And thats a moderation I can agree with. Now I just need $725...

      --
      Not more than you need, just more than you want
    8. Re:$725 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you're cheap doesn't mean everyone else is. I'd like to compare my buying habits with yours along with our quality of lives. I'm talking about parties, women, and more partying. People like different things you know, the world would be boring if we were all as frugal as you. Hot girls need someone, I guess it's me instead of you.

    9. Re:$725 by m0nkyman · · Score: 1

      A nice swiss dress watch will set you back considerably more than 725. Rolex, Vacherin Constantin, or Patek Phillipe watches cost more to service than that...

      --
      ~ a low user id is no indication I have a clue what I'm talking about.
    10. Re:$725 by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Heh. Not that nice. I was thinking more along the lines of something like this.

      =)

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  7. -MSN +Bluetooth = my $ by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I like the design of this watch. I looked for a long time to find a watch that was modestly priced, and not the standard 20-something standard-issue "got my first well-paying job" watch that everyone else has. So I got a Seiko Arctura. I would like a watch like this Tissot, but it would be much more attractive for me if it dumped the MSN feature, and added Bluetooth, so it could sync with my calendar, automatically set alarms, display the caller-id from my cell phone, etc...

    1. Re:-MSN +Bluetooth = my $ by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What in the world made you think that spending 400-650 USD on a Watch was a good idea?

    2. Re:-MSN +Bluetooth = my $ by mblase · · Score: 1

      I looked for a long time to find a watch that was modestly priced, and not the standard 20-something standard-issue "got my first well-paying job" watch that everyone [omega.ch] else [tagheuer.com] has.

      Y'know, I thought about getting one of those for a while. But throughout my life, it seemed like any time I bought an analog watch, it'd get busted inside of a year. Granted, they were relatively cheap things, but I was a bit scared to spend real money on something that'd just get dropped or put through the wash in my pocket or otherwise get scratched ugly because I was careless about brushing against the wall one day.

      So instead, I wear a $25 Timex digital with a web/faux leather wristband. The scratches hardly show on the plastic faceplate and it's endured more than all the other watches I've ever owned, combined. Plus I hate metal wristbands.

      I suppose I'm too practical for my own good. Seemed like a better investment, is all.

    3. Re:-MSN +Bluetooth = my $ by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      I dont know a 20 something that wears a watch ... maybe its a California thing? We all have cell phones and PDA's, alot of us have two cell phones (personal cell phone, work cell phone) wtf is the point of a watch?

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    4. Re:-MSN +Bluetooth = my $ by Zach+Garner · · Score: 1

      Omegas, which the grandparent poster has such a distaste for run from $1,500 to $3,000 for the average models. Omegas are an ok mid-grade mechanical timepiece. They're owned by Swatch Group, so you could just buy a Swatch for $500 and be happy. For that matter the majority of mechanical timepieces all have their internals made by Swatch Group.

      A few that don't are Jaeger LeCoultre (JLC), Patek Phillipe, A Lange & Soehne, Rolex, Ulysse Nardin, and I think a few IWC watches.

      The low end of those watches run from around $3,000 up to $10,000-$20,000 for the average watch. They go up to a few hundred thousand.

      So, perhaps, if dollars spent is all that mattered, he's spending a lot less than he could. None of this matters, I should say, if you want a Quartz watch. The above all are mostly/entirely mechanical watches.

      If interested in watches, a good resource is www.timezone.com.

    5. Re:-MSN +Bluetooth = my $ by Scutter · · Score: 1

      display the caller-id from my cell phone

      That would be awesome!

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    6. Re:-MSN +Bluetooth = my $ by RedShoeRider · · Score: 1
      Amen to not having the watches that everyone else has.

      Here are to some of the watches that say "I got my first well-paying job, AND I don't follow the unwashed masses".
      Such as:
      Sinn
      Zeno
      Sector
      Ollech & Wajs

      Just a few ideas :-)

      --

      Chris Knight is my hero.

    7. Re:-MSN +Bluetooth = my $ by Zach+Garner · · Score: 1

      Y'know, I thought about getting one of those for a while. But throughout my life, it seemed like any time I bought an analog watch, it'd get busted inside of a year.

      You probably mean mechanical watch. From mw.com:
      analog
      c : being a timepiece having hour and minute hands

      Obviously, they make quartz analog watches. There should be no difference in the quality, since there isn't a great deal of difference in the construction versus a "digital" watch.

      Granted, they were relatively cheap things, but I was a bit scared to spend real money on something that'd just get dropped or put through the wash in my pocket or otherwise get scratched ugly because I was careless about brushing against the wall one day.
      Unfortunately, you have to spend quite a bit of money, but you can get a mechanical watch that is quite resistant to wear and tear. Rolex and Omega both make pretty good heavy duty watches. Avoid companies like Patek and JLC who make more delicate pieces. There are quite a few lower end watches like from Swatch, Hamilton, Tissot, etc that are pretty good for the price. Again, a $25 watch will likely you last longer and keep time more acurately, so you should only by an expensive timepiece for other reasons than ariving at a meeting at exactly 3:00:00.

      I suppose I'm too practical for my own good. Seemed like a better investment, is all.

      Watches are far from an investment. Same goes for engagement rings, cars, and computers.

    8. Re:-MSN +Bluetooth = my $ by Zach+Garner · · Score: 1

      Or you could get a watch to wear to your next interview: A. Lange & Soehne. Depending on how well-paying that first job is.

    9. Re:-MSN +Bluetooth = my $ by wfberg · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth caller ID on your watch would be nice, but you'd still have to reach for your head/handset..

      Myself, I have this watch.

      The best feature of this watch is that it has both an analogue and digital read-out, with no less than 3 reverse-LCD screens. That's right, just like you used to do with your calculator in high school, the polarity on the LCD screens is reversed so that you get a black background (to go with the black faceplate) and LCD-green digits.

      OK, I probably won't hand it down to my grandchildren, but it's a nice looking watch with a geeky edge to it. And not even that expensive.

      If I went for a Seiko kinetic (for those not in the know - it doesn't need batteries, it recharges off the energy of your daily arm movements), I'd go for an ultra-flat model though, rather than the bling-bling.

      My other watch is a rather el Cheapo (though not really bad looking) radio-controlled watch. Can't find a picture of it, but really just a semi-tasteful plastic watch. Though I see that Citizen now have an all-metal casing radio-controlled watch (the metal would interfere with reception normally), so that's worth checking out.

      Junghans has some multi-frequency radio controlled watches for if you travel a lot. Unfortunately junghans watches are just butt-ugly. And for GPS you need a REALLY big antenna, so don't think about putting that in a watch. Perhaps bluetooth should take care of that some time..

      Unless you're looking at multi-K dollar all mechanical watches though, it's mostly a matter of taste. There are some surprisingly tasteful cheap watches out there, and some very truly GHASTLY watches that cost thousands of dollars (i.e. those blue-and-red-on-gold rolexes. Ugh.)

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    10. Re:-MSN +Bluetooth = my $ by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Actually, engagement rings are an investment. But it is an investment into non monetary things.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    11. Re:-MSN +Bluetooth = my $ by Zach+Garner · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer to use the more common definition (mw.com):

      investment
      Function: noun
      Etymology: 2invest
      : the outlay of money usually for income or profit : capital outlay; also : the sum invested or the property purchased

      All of those items mentioned are investments by your definition. A computer is an investment into your education, for instance. And any material posessions could be an investment into your personal well being or happiness.

    12. Re:-MSN +Bluetooth = my $ by extra88 · · Score: 1

      I don't wear one either and I'm in NY. I don't have a cel but at work I carry a pager and a PDA. Everywhere else I simply count on there being some form of time displaying device. My car has one and if I need to be somewhere on time, I'm driving there. If I'm going somewhere and knowing the time will be important, I'll bring my PDA. It'll beep me to remind me of my apointments anyway. If I walked a lot or used a bike for transportation I might be inclined to wear a watch. The PDA would not be a convenient time piece while on a bike. Now someone can link to a PDA-as-bike-computer product/project/dream.

    13. Re:-MSN +Bluetooth = my $ by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth caller ID on your watch would be nice, but you'd still have to reach for your head/handset..

      Or, depending on the caller, maybe not. :^)

      If I went for a Seiko kinetic (for those not in the know - it doesn't need batteries, it recharges off the energy of your daily arm movements), I'd go for an ultra-flat model though, rather than the bling-bling.

      I think most kinetic watches need to be somewhat bulky, in order to hold the weights and power generation gearing.

    14. Re:-MSN +Bluetooth = my $ by wfberg · · Score: 1


      If I went for a Seiko kinetic (for those not in the know - it doesn't need batteries, it recharges off the energy of your daily arm movements), I'd go for an ultra-flat model though, rather than the bling-bling.

      I think most kinetic watches need to be somewhat bulky, in order to hold the weights and power generation gearing.


      That's why the thickness was a big deal IIRC. I think most kinetics are 12 mm in case thickness, and I found for example this one that's only 9.5mm, which compares favorably with a lot of men's models. I'm not sure what the exact dimensions were of the model I'm thinking of though. Certainly nowhere near as flat as the Swatch ultra-flat watch (at 3.9mm thickness) though.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    15. Re:-MSN +Bluetooth = my $ by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      You know, I can very much understand that point of view. But I think that there is something to be said for the sheer culture and technology of a good timepiece. It represents the hight, in some ways, of the Industrial Revolution, just like a well crafted lighter represents man's conquest of fire.

      That's purely an emotional view, of course, but then again I am a tech fetishist I guess. Then again, I bet most of the people who visit /. are too.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    16. Re:-MSN +Bluetooth = my $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tissot sells this watch for $300 less without MSN direct. the touch functionality is really cool.

  8. SPOT Direct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MSN Direct is lame. Why not just spend the extra pennies and make it SPOT Direct?

  9. Mirror Mirror on the wall, could a watch server.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    handle this all?

    It appears not.

  10. Cheaper way to get information by baudilus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's called a radio. News, sports, weather, traffic. Here in the us, an am/fm radio (headphones) is as low as $7. That's all you need, and you don't look like a complete freak at the airport. Because after all, not looking like a geek is so very important to... geeks.

  11. 725... and how much a month? by firstposter161 · · Score: 1

    Someone refresh my memory, how much does this cost a month? Anything above free is too much, I mean, I can get the same services on my cell phone service, without having to contribute money to Micro$oft.

    1. Re:725... and how much a month? by SerpentMage · · Score: 3, Informative

      It costs 59 per year or 9.95 per month.
      http://direct.msn.com/about/service.aspx

      I checked it out, and what I find interesting is that there no universal coverage. That is really interesting as it means in most places (not much coverage) your watch is a great wrist weight.

      Gee makes me REALLY want to buy it, NOT!

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  12. Just in case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative


    If anyone is wondering the proper pronunciation is "Tee-so" the second T is silent. Don't ask me why, its a swiss thing.

    1. Re:Just in case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Presumptively, I'd say it's a French thing.

    2. Re:Just in case by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that it is because the name is French. The last letter in a French word is silent unless there is an accent on a vowel.

      Of course, one could just Anglisize the word and piss off the French. "Tiss-sot" :-P

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  13. SO how is it better than this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fossil has had one out for a while at $179. http://tinyurl.com/yptan [fossil.com]

  14. Do people still wear watches? by leathered · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have done without a watch ever since I got my first mobile phone. Many of my friends also no longer have watches and merely pull their phone out of there pocket if they want to know the time. Come to think of it I'm sure I see a lot less people wearing watches than say ten years ago.

    --
    For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
    1. Re:Do people still wear watches? by Total_Wimp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wish I had the mod points to give you. I did the same. My phone replaced my watch and my alarm clock (phone was actually louder and easier to use) ever since I got my first Nokia 6160.

      But wait, there's more. Since I have a smart phone now (Nokia 3650) I've also replaced my PDA for email, contacts and calendar, not to mention some cool games. And, back to time, I have a nifty little app that tells me what time it is, and the weather, in five cities of my choice around the world (yes, I do use it).

      Clearly this watch has a way to go to be relevant in the age of convergent phones.

      TW

    2. Re:Do people still wear watches? by lelitsch · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I still wear a watch, and probably will until I get one of those nice Neuromancer implants. Here's why:

      The battery life of my watch is 10 years, it's about a week for my phone

      I can see it without fumbling for my phone

      My last phone didn't show the time while scuba diving

      My phone doesn't work too well when I am mountain biking/working out/traveling abroad

      I like the way my watch feels

      Occasionally, I really want to be away from my phone

      My cell phone has completely replaced my PDA, though.
    3. Re:Do people still wear watches? by Mac+Degger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This isn't a dig at you, but the one reason I can't replace my PDA with a phone is data entry. Because I have quite a few appointments and a lot made (well) in advance, I have to specify them with qualifiers (14.15 meeting room 2.15 isn't enough). It just takes too long when you have to press buttons twice, thrice or even four times for a single letter (and T9 doesn't work for that kind of thing).

      And that's why I need and probably won't replace a PDA. Plus, try reading books on a cellphone :) Or doing some quick matrix calculations with graphed solutions :(

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    4. Re:Do people still wear watches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people wear watches as a fashion accessory and not for it's timekeeping ability. Although, this line of thinking may be a bit foreign to the slashdot crowd.

    5. Re:Do people still wear watches? by syousef · · Score: 1

      What on earth do you do if you're somewhere where you can't have your mobile phone switched on but you want to know the time?

      I'm NOT thinking of places you can have it on silent. I'm talking hospital rooms, near flamables etc.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    6. Re:Do people still wear watches? by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      A reasonable question and probably the biggest reason the newest devices have an "airplane" mode where the radio is turned off, but the device still works.

      But I have no such "airplane mode" with my current device. For me the answer is that I'm not often in hostpitals or on airplanes. I hate to say it, but I ignore the flamables warning because I've not heard of a single case were something has caught fire/blown up because of a cell phone and I also haven't heard of any cases of people actually turning them off at the gas pump.

      TW

  15. Another link by huie · · Score: 2, Informative

    Follow the MSN link on the Tissot T-Tactile page for the manufacturer's product info page.

    1. Re:Another link by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      Already dead. I get a background image, and that's it. Nice try.

  16. Re:geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I'm a troll. Whilst it could be argued that the two labels are not mutually exclusive, the apparent tendency is that trolls tend not to be geeks. It requires subtly and an understanding of the mind that is far beyond the understanding of your garden-variety geek.

    Whilst there are other forums to frequent, Slashdot provides a veritable fish-in-a-barrel scenario. Some may say that for this reason it is below them, it does provide a fertile ground for developing new techniques to snag the more sophisticated person, precisely because the reactions are so infantile and vigourous.

    Thank you for participating in my experiment.

  17. I have a Fossil MSN Direct watch... by IANAAC · · Score: 1
    and it's not bad at all. It was a total impulse buy. But I actually use the weather, calendar and news briefs on it. I don't do much rural travel, so the coverage for me has been pretty good.

    I will mention, though, that if you get on an airplane with it you should turn the radio off, although I doubt anyone would know the difference. It just looks like a big watch.

    Had I known any better I would have opted for the Suunto model - much nicer looking and water-resistent.

  18. Re: Mirror Mirror on the wall, could a watch serve by David+Horn · · Score: 1

    That has to be a record - 30 comments and their server's gone down.

    --
    PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
  19. Battery Life? by niktesla · · Score: 4, Insightful
    5 Day Battery Life?

    I don't know about yall, but I'd like to not have to worry about my watch battery dying in less than a week. I guess you could just charge it each night, but my good old Timex has had only one battery change in about 10 years!

    --
    I've discovered a remarkable proof, but this margin is too small to contain it...
    1. Re:Battery Life? by leathered · · Score: 1

      There's almost certainly an internal battery to keep the clock ticking over, but that begs the question can you tell the time while the main battery is kaputt?

      --
      For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
    2. Re:Battery Life? by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      I don't know about yall, but I'd like to not have to worry about my watch battery dying in less than a week.

      It's worse. I used to have a watch with a rechargeable battery. After at most a few thousand charges they die, meaning that not only do you have to spend the extra effort charging it all the time, but you have to replace it MORE often than a regular non-rechargeable watch battery.

    3. Re:Battery Life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a very easy charging system for these watches. (I own an Abacus Model myself). It uses induction so no contacts have to be made. Just set it on its stand before you go to bed. Thats with the $110 model, the Tissot watch surely has something intuitive as well.

    4. Re:Battery Life? by burns210 · · Score: 1

      Yea, but can your Timex get Spam? Didn't think so.

  20. Nothing says success like... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Not even having a watch at all!

    If you're really important, you don't NEED to care what time it is. People can wait for you.

    I'm not that important by a longshot, but I don't wear a watch anyway. I used to have a nice altimiter watch but now I really prefer nothing on my wrists.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Nothing says success like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you're really important, you don't NEED to care what time it is. People can wait for you.

      The problem is that such a standard is way too high. There isn't a single person in the world who everyone is willing to wait for. If earth still hasn't produced a "successful" person then it's probably time to give up on the idea.

  21. Same here by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are now so many things around me that tell time that I have not bothered to wear a watch for years and years, I really like having my wrist free.

    I wish my cell phone were one such device though, it seems to like being several hours ahead.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  22. Wristwatches by LookSharp · · Score: 1

    For you and me, the guys that do the desktop support, it might be argued that a $725 tech watch requires "deep pockets."

    However, I have a few friends here at work who are the senior engineer or executive types who are more into timepieces that cost several thousands of dollars, and receive bonuses regularly enough to afford them. (See the "Submariner" series.)

    Just thought I would share.

  23. WATCH OUT, not a watch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am getting my wife an Omega tomorrow -- Constellation, Automatic and on top of that in Barcelona. Beats any MSN watch anyday.

  24. Press Release by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    Jebus, can they get any more blatant about their press releases?

    I seriously wish Slashdot would start flagging them as such, but of course they'd never do that. God, just look at the wording used in it, and then, for absolute proof, check where the submitters name links to.

    Yup, http://www.spotstop.com/.

    I'll pass on this watch, no matter how much it might have interested me because of this submission.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Press Release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      spotstop.com is not affiliated or supported in any way by MSN or Microsoft.

      Believe me or not as you see fit, but it ain't astroturf. That's a pure enthusiast site.

      (I'm posting anon so I can't too easily get in trouble. Disclaimer : I'm in the SPOT group at MS)

  25. $725 by smatt-man · · Score: 0

    That watch costs more than the car I am currently driving...

    --

    ---
    Lousy rotten karmic retribution.
  26. Re: GPS Watches by billstewart · · Score: 1
    I have a Canon GPS watch I received as a present about 5 years ago. I think the price was about $500 then. No altimeter, and no GPS altitude reading either. It's a bit big and clunky as a watch, but it had immediate geekiness-cred (:-) and was quite enjoyable.

    On the other hand, as a GPS, it's even slower and less sensitive than the earliest ~$100 GPSs back then. I forget if it did 8 satellites or 12, but it was serial rather than parallel reception, so it takes a while to get an initial reading. It doesn't work near buildings or too many trees, either, which limits its usefulness. It's presumably possible to do a much better job today, but you do sacrifice some things by fitting it into a watch. Also, it uses special batteries, which don't have really long life and aren't rechargeable, while I can run my pocket GPS on NiMHs or rechargeable alkalines.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  27. but I have.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... a SUNDIAL you insensitive clod!

    I really DO, too, so there, nyah nyah nyah!

  28. I want a fancy new watch by Yeechang+Lee · · Score: 1

    My Junghans Carbon radio-controlled watch served me reasonably well for almost four years (and three watchbands and two batteries) before dying. That, plus a recent bonus, are my excuses for looking at new watches. Here's what I'm looking for, with attributes categorized by priority:

    MUST HAVE
    * Analog hands *and* a digital display
    * Solar
    * Backlight
    * Radio-controlled time sync

    IMPORTANT
    * Rugged manufacture (steel or titanium)
    * Waterproof
    * Syncs to US and either/both of European and Japanese time signals

    WOULD BE NICE
    * Big, gaudy, Rolex chronograph-like look (lots of mini dials with spinning hands, bezel that turns, etc.) [1]
    * Leather band [2]

    [1] As a six-footer I can wear a big watch if necessary.
    [2] Yes, I know this likely contradicts my desire for a rugged watch.

    So far it looks like some variant of the Japanese-only MRG-2000DJ is the current biggest and baddest Casio Wave Ceptor model, and also fits the above bill. Any other suggestions, whether more or less expensive? And as any contestants will almost certainly be Japan-only models, suggestions on the best way for a non-Japanese speaker to buy one barring having a friend pick one up in Japan? Are there watch equivalents of Dynamism and its imported ultra-small laptops? I'm not afraid of an invalid warranty.

  29. Fossil copied Tissot (or the other way around?) by Mobile+Mineral · · Score: 1

    When I first saw a Fossil watch I thought it was a rip off of a Tissot, because the Fossil logo looks like an upside-down Tissot logo. With this product though, I am not sure why Tissot wants to follow Fossil.

  30. T-Touch by floydman · · Score: 1

    I for one have the Tissot T-Touch watch, reffered on /. before, and believe me, thats one hell of a watch. It was worth every penny.Has a built in comapss in it where the clock hands actually change to a comapss, so not to make the watch bulky, thermometer, barometer, altimeter, you name it.

    Besides dont forget that some ppl are just so fond of watches, they respect a good watch and wish to own it (just like some ppl are fond of cars, or HW).

    --
    The lunatic is in my head
  31. my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hot girls who have an IQ don't generally see money or frugality as a dealbreaker. One's ability and willingness to blow money is a very minor factor in their calculations. They may go on fun dates with the guy who likes to blow money but they will go into the relationship with the guy whom they trust and see as being good for them. Good for them primarily in terms of fulfilling their needs, which doesn't have a lot to do with money.

  32. Re:geeks by josh3736 · · Score: 1
    You're not a geek or a troll.

    You are just a dumbass.

    My bet: you're a twelve-year-old with zero social skills, zero friends. You try to look smart by using big words. You have nothing valuable to contribute to mature discussion; instead you post flamebait and add to the clutter. You are nothing more than wasted mod points that could have been used to bring out a valuable comment.

    The fact that you were defensive to being called a geek only confirms my theory. You have to point out how much smarter you are than a "geek." You're out to prove that you're not a loser, so you go around insulting people and calling them losers in an anonymous manner. Now that, my friend, takes balls. Guess what -- you are the loser.

    My advice: grow up and act with some maturity. Treat others with respect. Be friendly towards people. Who knows, you might even make some real-life friends. Get out of the house and do something. I find it ironic that you talk about "lamers" sitting in their parents' basement when you yourself posted that comment from your parents' house. Not to mention the little bit about "pretending to know anything."

    Oh, and don't use "whilst." It only makes it painfully obvious that you are trying to sound intelligent.

    --
    Not posted anonymously because I have balls and I don't have anything to prove.