Slashdot Mirror


NASA Set To Launch Probe To Mercury

antispam_ben writes "CNN is reporting the upcoming Messenger mission to Mercury is set to launch August 2. The spacecraft uses a combination of technologies (insulation, Peltier devices, careful design and orbit, always keeping the shield side toward the Sun) to keep its electronics at room temperature."

54 of 216 comments (clear)

  1. Cool... by JosKarith · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...well, compared to the melting point of Tin anyway...

    --
    'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    1. Re:Cool... by haystor · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because it's so hot near the sun, NASA plans to go to Mercury at night.

      --
      t
  2. Messenger huh? by Deflagro · · Score: 4, Funny

    Better hope Microsoft isn't watching, they may sue for copyright violation.

    Nasa: But it isn't MS Messenger!!
    Gates: I don't care, gimme mo' money beeyatch!@#

    --
    Der Tod ist der einzige Weg hier raus!
  3. hmm by Docrates · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nasa's Messenger? I wonder if Trillian will cover it...

    --

    There are two kinds of people in the world: Those with good memory.
  4. room temp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is room temperature an actual degree? I always thought it was just the temp of the envirnment that the time. If that's the case, room temp for the spacecraft is pretty hot no?

    1. Re:room temp? by julesh · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are various definitions of room temperature. The one most often used is 20 degrees C (Err... about 75 degrees F, I think).

    2. Re:room temp? by foistboinder · · Score: 4, Funny

      It doesn't matter what temperature a room is, it's always room temperature.
      -- Steven Wright

  5. Aerogel is superior, but expensive. by Sovern · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since aerogels have much higher thermal insulation values than practically any other medium except hard vacuum they are especially excellent insulation candidates in poor to moderate vacuum ranges.

    --
    And it rendered on, until the end of its days.
  6. peltzer device?! by twiggy · · Score: 2

    Whoa, Peltzer devices? Awesome. I'm not sure how it's going to help us in space, but who am I to say that putting a smokeless ashtray, a juicer and a weird swiss army thing with a toothbrush that shoots out toothpaste onto a space probe is wrong?

    --
    http://www.babysmasher.com
    http://www.openingbands.com
    1. Re:peltzer device?! by carnivore302 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, it's a Peltier device. Peltier devices, also known as thermoelectric (TE) modules, are small solid-state devices that function as heat pumps. A "typical" unit is a few millimeters thick by a few millimeters to a few centimeters square. It is a sandwich formed by two ceramic plates with an array of small Bismuth Telluride cubes ("couples") in between. When a DC current is applied heat is moved from one side of the device to the other - where it must be removed with a heatsink. The "cold" side is commonly used to cool an electronic device such as a microprocessor or a photodetector. If the current is reversed the device makes an excellent heater.


      Click on the Mystery Futures Link!

      --
      Please login to access my lawn
  7. Careful design by Malc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is this a novelty or something? Why does it even need to be mentioned?

  8. Actually NASA is borrowing cooling technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...developed by nVidia for the NV30 launch, but scaled back because they only need to protect Messenger from a class G star as opposed to a modern graphics card.

  9. Go Messenger! by hpulley · · Score: 5, Informative

    While most other planets have been well studied, Mercury has not even had half its surface mapped! Messenger has non-visual light detectors including a laser altimiter which will let it map the whole planet, counteracting its slow rate of rotation. I hope the launch goes well and look forward to the data return. Kudos to NASA for doing some good science on what is considered a less sexy target than some others which seem to hog all the research money.

    --
    $#!^ happens, but why does it always have to happen to me???
  10. Yeah, but what about the other side? by FortKnox · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...to keep its electronics at room temperature.

    But what about the other side? Lets ask Roosevelt E Roosevelt:

    Well, thank you, Roosevelt. What's the weather like out there?
    "It's hot. Damn hot! Real hot! Hottest things is my shorts. I could cook things in it. A little crotch pot cooking."
    Well, can you tell me what it feels like?
    "Fool, it's hot! I told you again! Were you born on the sun? It's damn hot! I saw... It's so damn hot, I saw little guys, their orange robes burst into flames. It's that hot! Do you know what I'm talking about?"
    What do you think it's going to be like tonight?
    "It's gonna be hot and wet! That's nice if you're with a lady, but it ain't no good if you're in the jungle."


    Ahh, what a great movie.

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  11. Another mission to Mercury to be in 2012 by zzabur · · Score: 4, Informative

    For more information, see ESA BepiColombo page.

    --
    Auferre trucidare rapere falsis nominibus imperium, atque ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  12. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  13. Reply from Messenger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    M'Ger: It's getting hot in here, so take off all your clothes.

    P.S. Please send more info on carbon-based units infesting Earth.

  14. Proof of a Male-dominated design? by grunt107 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "...the spacecraft must swing once past Earth, twice past Venus and thrice past Mercury before slowing down enough to slip into orbit around Mercury"

    Her>That's the 2nd time I've seen Mercury! Stop and ask!
    Him>I will not ask for directions! I know where we are now
    Her>I have to pee! And you promised we'd get some Venutian shopping done!

    *NOTE* - It is rather interesting that the craft must maneuver like this to get a stable orbit and not get crushed.

    1. Re:Proof of a Male-dominated design? by liquidsin · · Score: 3, Funny

      If it was a male-dominated design, I'd like to think it would "slip into" venus, *not* mercury. The fact that it's beating around the bush so much before it finally gets to where it's going speaks more for a design by the fairer sex.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
  15. Very interesting. by robslimo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know thermal issues have always been central to spacecraft design, but this sounds like a nicely engineered approach to temperature control.

    I'm reminded of the faulty heater on one of the Mars Rovers. Could such problems be avoided or at least mitigated by use of more passive thermal management (insulation, heat pipes, heat sinking/sourcing)?

    I'm also reminded of the Russian probes to Venus which had uderstandably short lives due to both heat and pressure (possibly corrosive gases as well).

    I'm firmly in the camp that promotes more unmanned probes, maximizing the power of money spent on advancing spacecraft technology and knowledge from expanded exploration rather than blowing it all on the dubious value of letting a person stand on Mars.

    1. Re:Very interesting. by confused+one · · Score: 3, Informative
      The Mars rover heater is a faulty switch, causing the heater to be always on. It's so damn cold on Mars you need heaters on all the joints to keep the lubrication from freezing solid. passive thermal management wouldn't work because it assumes you've got a heat source to draw from. The most passive approach you could apply to the Mars rover would be (would have been) to use radio-thermal heaters at each of the joints.

      Wouldn't work well on Venus either. You need a sink into which to pump the heat. Given the 800F surface temperature, you'd have to do an awful lot of work to pump to an acceptable temperature in the electronics bays. I'm not saying it's impossible, just hard.

      the Mercury mission will work because they're putting a big insulative blanket between the electronics and the sun, to provide shade; and, they're pumping the heat from the electronics bays to the cold side (facing away from the Sun) of the craft where it's -200F

  16. Explanation by Timesprout · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Even though Mercury is 50 million miles from Earth at closest approach, Messenger will travel 5 billion miles to get there. It's technologically infeasible to fly straight to Mercury, a trip of a few months, and so the spacecraft must swing once past Earth, twice past Venus and thrice past Mercury before slowing down enough to slip into orbit around Mercury.

    Can someone explain why such a convoluted and time consuming route is required?

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Explanation by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 4, Informative
      You can launch a giant ship with a giant fuel tank that cost 800 billion dollars, or you can launch a small, reasonably priced craft and use the gravitation of the planets to do your work for you.

      NASA can explain it better: http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/the_mission/mission_de sign.html

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
    2. Re:Explanation by edremy · · Score: 4, Funny
      You can't carry enough fuel on the probe to match the orbital velocity and still launch on a small rocket. Mercury's orbital speed is about 47.9 km/sec, Earth's is 29.8 km/sec- you've got to get about 20km/sec (~40,000 mph) from somewhere, and chemical rockets aren't feasible.

      However, you can steal energy from planets using gravity assists. JPL is amazingly good at doing these.

      <tinfoilhat> We do need to worry that JPL is slowly robbing orbital energy from the planets they use. I've been worried about our profligate use of this irreplaceable resource for a long time. Worse, JPL seems to be totally blase about using Earth as one of their prime engines- enough gravity assists and the earth will fall into the sun!

      Join the League to Conserve the Angular Momemtum of Planets today!

      --
      "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    3. Re:Explanation by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 3, Informative
      It's not the shove. It's the slowing down part. The gravity assists decelerate the probe until the onboard propellant has a hope of establishing a stable orbit around Mercury. It's a way of tapping the vast potential energy represented by a planetary sized mass.

      Remember, the probe is moving further into the Solar System, so it needs to *decelerate* from Earth-normal angular momentum.

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
    4. Re:Explanation by merlin_jim · · Score: 4, Informative

      Can someone explain why such a convoluted and time consuming route is required?

      It's all about delta-v... how much can you change your velocity?

      Earth orbits the sun at a specific velocity.

      Mercury orbits the sun at a much smaller velocity.

      But in order to fly straight there, you have to counteract all of the orbital velocity you have at earth, then either free fall or thrust to the new location, and then build up the orbital velocity of Mercury to make orbit. That's a lot of delta v, and a lot of working fluid to put into your thrusters. In fact, even if we felt like paying that fuel bill, we don't really have the technology to build a probe large enough to carry all that fuel, or to get that fuel out of Earth's gravity well in the first place.

      So instead what we do is figure out a low-delta v way to launch it, bringing it into the inner solar system and slowing it down on the way. The key to this is slingshot maneuvers - using the gravity wells peppered throughout the solar system to change the direction of velocity without having to spend delta-v on it.

      That and the craft makes use of a little-known feature of relativity; the more energy in your fuel, the heavier it is; if you burn the fuel you have deep in a gravity well, it is quite a bit more effective than it would be in space. This is related to the law that predicts you cannot travel at the speed of light; as you go faster, your intertial mass rises, in such a way that it would take an infinite amount of thrust to reach the speed of light.

      Sure your craft has more inertial mass, too, but you'll be slowing down as you exit the gravity well, leaving your fuel behind you, and that's where the mathematical magic happens.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  17. They totally modded out that bird... by JBMcB · · Score: 2, Funny

    Entec case fans, Swiftech water cooling with dual radiators, Thermaltake fanless PSU, PC Power bay coolers, the works! Lian-Li designed the case to the BTX standard, and the radiation-hardened 486 is overclocked to 100MHz! All they need now is the NASA case badge...

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  18. Re:Can't we have just one place? by sopuli · · Score: 2, Funny

    The funny thing is that they are going to 'plant' the flag by crashing messenger into Mercury. And here I was thinking that flag-burning was a criminal offence in the USA.

  19. Re:Can't we have just one place? by JPelorat · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's just a marker that we went there, not that we own it. Sheesh, settle down.

    --
    Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
  20. Re:Well, that's just dandy! by jav1231 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There will always be homeless and by and large we take of most of our mentally ill. I'd rather spend it on space exploration than pumping some pork into politician's buddies pockets...but then again, we'll have that for awhile too. We all benefit from space exploration. New technologies are discovered, invented, born, what have you.

  21. NASA brings you Messenger... by archetypeone · · Score: 2, Funny

    Proudly sponsored by MSN!

  22. Re:But are they... by SEWilco · · Score: 2, Funny

    As with any planetary probe, they are using the scientific standard of the metric system. Of course, as Mercury is smaller than Earth the meter also is smaller. As usual, Earth meters are used until Earth escape velocity is reached. Solar meters are used until the craft decelerates at Mercury. The Mercury meters will then be used for the remainder of the mission.

  23. Re:But are they... by AC-x · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well as long as they don't use feet and inches they should be safe

  24. Too much technology by keoghp · · Score: 2, Funny

    All that technology - what a waste. The cost too!

    If they had sent it at night...

    --
    For problems, seek only the simplest solution, complexity brings with it more problems.
  25. I'll take that bet by Engineer-Poet · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Quoth the poster:
    I bet that the flight plans include hiding the other side of planets/moons for as long as possible to take advantage of all that lovely shade.
    Space is mighty big. Shadows are few and far between. When you have a spacecraft that has to take 11 suns beating on its face for months at a time during cruise, why would a mission designer compromise his science by trying to pass behind bodies just for the shade? (For gravity-assist maneuvers, yes. Shade, no.)
    ... if fuel wasn't a consideration I bet they'd love to run straight up Mercury's shadow and just park in it.
    If you parked in Mercury's shadow you wouldn't be able to do any analysis that requires good light (like spectroscopy to determine mineral composition) nor would you be able to watch any day-side phenomena like observing the rate of warming and thus the thermal conductivity of the surface.
    1. Re:I'll take that bet by M1FCJ · · Score: 2, Informative
      this is a common misconception. Mercury is not in tidal-lock with sun. It rotates slowly and for three Mercury years, it has two Mercury days but it does rotate and sunny side is not always the same side.

      This has interesting side effects like Sun popping out from East, moving towards west, halting, moving backwards down again and then raising for a second time before moving across the sky.

  26. Anyone else reminded of Brin's Sundiver by merlin_jim · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I like their cooling solution much better; high temperature superconductors and peltiers to move the heat to a central location, where the kinetic energy is used to power a communications laser.

    Too bad our current superconducting technology is scaling more slowly the higher temperature it gets. What we're currently calling "high temperature" means room temp. We'll make it there eventually. But without a whole new technology (nanotech anyone?) we'll never make superconductors that remain super conducting at temperatures much higher than that.

    But what about a laser powered by heat? Can it happen without having to reach the ionization temperature of the lasing medium? Anyone have any insight?

    --
    I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    1. Re:Anyone else reminded of Brin's Sundiver by Ignignot · · Score: 2, Informative

      But what about a laser powered by heat? Can it happen without having to reach the ionization temperature of the lasing medium? Anyone have any insight?

      Now I am not a laser scientist (IANALS) but I am an electrical engineer. Almost all lasers are powered by heat, in a roundabout way. Power generators usually use a heat differential to produce a circular motion which is turned into electricity. Electricity goes to your laser and makes it go. So yes, a laser can be powered by heat. I don't think it can be done directly, and attaching a steam power plant to a satellite would be a little bizzare.

      I assume that your goal here isn't to produce electricity because solar panels do a good job without all this fuss. Instead I assume the laser is to keep the spacecraft cool. Now stay with me while I describe heat transfer. There are two ways that an object can stay cool - either by bleeding heat into surrounding medium (none or very very little in space) or radiate it away. The radiation emitted is directly related to what is absorbed. For example, white absorbs little and emits little. Black absorbs a lot and radiates a lot. So to keep your spacecraft cool you could just paint the side towards the sun white (or mirror) and paint the side away from the sun black. Or you can do what NASA did and put a heat shield in front of the spacecraft with very little connection between the two. Sure it'll get hot, but the small connection means that there won't be much heat transfer between the heat sensitive electronics and the very hot shield. Its all about effeciency.

      --
      I submitted this story last night, and it didn't get posted.
    2. Re:Anyone else reminded of Brin's Sundiver by merlin_jim · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When you do that the white side absorbs only a little of incoming heat, and then it is transferred by contact to the black side, which transmits the heat away pretty well.

      Hmmm... maybe phase-change solid-state heatpipes would help this even more; integrate them directly with the material of the ship...

      As a matter of fact that may be a good technique for any space ship, to guarantee that no part of the ship gets too hot or too cold.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    3. Re:Anyone else reminded of Brin's Sundiver by Ignignot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am not sure heatpipes would work because they use different densities of the heat transfer medium (like water or air) to cycle it. While the mediums will still have different densities, they won't move at all because there would be no gravity. I guess you could spin the spacecraft, and that would produce a similar effect. However I think that the movement of the medium would eventually screw up the spin of the spacecraft until it became an uncontrolled tumble - bad. You could counteract this with gyros or thrusters I guess. Complicated. :-)

      --
      I submitted this story last night, and it didn't get posted.
    4. Re:Anyone else reminded of Brin's Sundiver by sexylicious · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm familiar with the principles behind the operation of a laser, thank you.

      I hope this isn't meant to sound pissy on your part. I did not intend to come across as lecturing or condescending. I thought I was coming across as helpful and friendly.

      You could use a thermal cycle as you stated. Though I don't think it would be very efficient. The likely candidate would be a brayton cycle because it would be more easily engineered on a spacecraft than the ideal carnot cycle.

      However, I think it would be more feasible to use some kind of conductive mesh that has individual molecules or atoms trapped in the lattice of the mesh. I was thinking a mesh solely for the surface area you would have.

      Another option may be a thin resonating chamber filled with a gas that just happens to resonate at the same energy level as your gas. The gas cools your heat shields and uses the peltier effect to flow in low gravity. Your gas would be a coolant and a lasing medium. I think the only serious issue here is cooling of the gas too much. I don't know that you'd necessarily need an optical shutter either; just have the gas constantly lasing.

  27. Re:Room Temperature by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I would hope they would make it come down to that temperature, I don't know of any kind of insulation that would actually do that.

    It shouldn't be all that hard since in space thermal control based almost solely on radiant energy. Even though the side facing the sun will get very hot, the side facing away from the sun is exposed to empty space with a temperature near absolute zero. If you simply reflect most of the sunlight away on the hot side, slow down what gets absorbed with a little insulation, and arrange to radiate what does get through the insulation (along with any internally generated heat) on the cold side, you should be able to maintain a reasonable temperature.

    From what I've read, one of the hardest parts about controlling temperature on this probe is to handle the times when it passes in front of Mercury. Then, the near-zero chill on the "cold" side is temporarily replaced with the radiant heat from the > 400 C surface of the planet. At these times the probe has to be closed up like an ice chest to maintain its internal temperature at reasonable levels until it gets away from the planet.

  28. Re:Room Temperature by bs_testability · · Score: 2, Insightful

    sure, and is the solar panels aren't generating quite enough power wire a flashlight to them as well and direct its beam back onto the panel!

  29. Ownership of space by philbert26 · · Score: 2, Informative
    It's just a marker that we went there, not that we own it. Sheesh, settle down.

    Correct. According to article II of the Outer Space treaty (signed by the USA): "Outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means."

  30. NASA Website for Messenger by tpdei · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those that care, here's the link for the NASA site on Messenger. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/messenger/main/i ndex.html

  31. Blatant commercialism... by the+darn · · Score: 2, Funny

    I know the future of exploration is in the private sector, but must NASA pander so obviously to its industrial sponsors? At least the craft's design is pretty cool... http://new-cars.com/concept/2003/mercury-messenger -concept-photos.html

    --
    Ceci n'est pas un post.
  32. Re:It's better than... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    FRY: This is a great, as long as you don't make me smell Uranus. Heh heh.
    LEELA: I don't get it.
    PROFESSOR FARNSWORTH: I'm sorry, Fry, but astronomers renamed Uranus in 2620 to end that stupid joke once and for all.
    FRY: Oh. What's it called now?
    PROFESSOR FARNSWORTH: Urectum.

  33. The really amazing thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...isn't the 5 gigamile trip. It's the launch window. They have a 12 second launch window to either launch it or wait for the next 12 second window-- the next day, at the earliest. Because of the multiple fly-bys, the math gets a little complicated, and error tends to cascade towards failure.

    Talk about performance anxiety!

    Wife: OK Honey, I'm ready. You've got 12 seconds.

    Enough for a high school boy, I imagine, but not us mighty slash dotters, right? ;-)

  34. Re:Room Temperature by Rei · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Thank you for saving me the time. Some people just don't get that, on a spacecraft, you're dealing with a near closed system here apart from solar input. No matter how much insulation you have, if you're not A) reflecting the solar radiation away, or B) radiating the heat away from your craft, you're going to burn up.

    Thinking that you can simply insulate a probe enough to handle solar radiation is like thinking that you could swim in a volcano for weeks if only you could find a good enough type of insulation. The insulation for the probe is to help reduce the effects of heating/cooling cycles, not to keep the probe's temperature down.

    --
    SILENCE BLATHERING TOADIES! We are your new masters.
  35. Re:Good Candidate for outsourcing by antispam_ben · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You see all these people working on these satellites wearing protective clothing, not to protect the people but to protect the equipment.

    Often it's to protect both the people and the equipment from each other. You may recall the "bad day" a year or rwo ago when a 200 million dollar sattelite under construction fell over (because someone took the platform mounting bolts to use in another project without documenting the removal, and later when they tilted the platform...). Some of the pictures I saw showed yellow tape around it to keep people out, as there was fear that some of the sealed gases would leak from damaged tanks.

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
  36. Re:hey by Bill+Hayden · · Score: 2, Informative

    as long as its room temperature in there, why not toss a few people/monkeys/whatever in with it?

    That would be because it's going to take several years to arrive.

    --
    Protect your browser with the Force Safe Search add-on
  37. Re:Careful design and orbit? by Gilthalas · · Score: 4, Informative

    The planet does indeed spin - Mercury rotates on its axis 1.5 times per solar orbit (see http://www.solarviews.com/eng/mercury.htm). Because of this 3:2 resonance, a Mercury solar day (sunrise to sunrise) is equivalent to 176 Earth days.

    So what this means is that for every Earth year Messenger is orbit, 4 Mercury Years will pass, which consists of 2 Mercury Solar Days (see http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/the_mission/mission_de sign.html.

    This gives the spacecraft many passes over the light and dark side of the planet, so much that they can spend one (Mercury) day doing global mapping and the second (Mercury) day doing targeted science investigations.

    In terms of heat - the highly elliptical, near polar orbit is designed so that the heat shield always faces the sun, giving the instruments a nice room temperature setting on the other side of the shield. There is the possibility of heat from the surface, but the instruments are designed to take that into account.

    --

    Gilthalas
    Software Engineer, Space Dept, JHU/APL
    Support Space Science!
  38. Heat limited the lifetime of Venus landers by Engineer-Poet · · Score: 2, Informative
    (Note, previous response is wrong.)

    The Venera landers were able to make it down to the surface, and IIRC one or two of them actually sent back pictures for a while. Their lifespans were very strictly limited by their insulation; as heat soaked in there was no way to pump it out again, and it did not take long before the electronics were too hot to function.

    1. Re:Heat limited the lifetime of Venus landers by canavan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of those that actually reached the surface, almost all worked until their batteries ran out or the Spacecraft bus which was used as a relay left radio range, whichever happened first. If I'm not mistaken, the early ones were cracked by pressure and not cooked - the immense pressure on the surface wasn't known until Venera 7. There's a very interesting website on the russian missions to Venus. And at least Venera 9, 10 13 and 14 returned pictures from the surface, that's 4.