Slashdot Mirror


TiVo-Like Service Coming To Australia

rosy writes with good news for Australian television watchers: "CNET.com.au is reporting that a TiVo-like service will be available in November this year. Dubbed ICE ("Intelligent Content Engine") and developed by Peter Vogel, the technology will be built into set top boxes and personal video recorders to skip ads or lower the volume, view electronic program guides, etc. The article states that the service will cost $2-3 per week with the service launching initially in Sydney, Newcastle and Wollongong."

33 of 121 comments (clear)

  1. Oz Tivo by mongrol · · Score: 5, Funny

    Perhaps, Australia being upside down, Tivo make work the opposite and actually put decent programming onto the TV rather than take it off.

    1. Re:Oz Tivo by weighn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      not a chance - Murdoch or Packer will buy it before its wings dry. Then its just another outlet for Fox or 9.

      --
      Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  2. Hmm... by incog8723 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dubbed ICE ("Intelligent Content Engine") and developed by Peter Vogel, the technology will be built into set top boxes and personal video recorders to skip ads or lower the volume, view electronic program guides, etc.

    When did pr0n start having ads in the middle of the show, and why would you want to lower the volume?

    1. Re:Hmm... by Artega+VH · · Score: 3, Funny

      When did pr0n start having ads in the middle of the show, and why would you want to lower the volume?

      Let me translate for you..
      It means you can skip the dialogue and plot, and allows you to instantly switch "channels" much like the good ole "boss key".

      --
      groklaw, wired and slashdot. The holy trinity of work based time wasting.
    2. Re:Hmm... by weighn · · Score: 2, Funny

      i'd hate to see one of those "ICE Nannies"

      --
      Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  3. Ads and Spams by usefool · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While Vogel didn't reveal much of the technical detail behind how the ICE system works, he did state that it was backed up by live monitoring -- so presumably he'll be looking to hire people to watch solitary TV stations 24/7 -- to enable the system to react automatically to ad changes, or late running TV programs.

    If spams are anything like ads, maybe it's time someone looks into doing something similar (live monitoring) for spams.

    --
    Uselessful technology (Air-Charged
    1. Re:Ads and Spams by Rosonowski · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the trick is that there's a breif pause between the show and the ads in which there is a black screen. It detects this black screen (and probably some other stuff imbedded in the signal) and knows to mark it as the start of the commercial, and then waits for the other black screen signal to mark it as the end of the commercial.

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
    2. Re:Ads and Spams by SurgeonGeneral · · Score: 2, Funny

      If spams are anything like ads, maybe it's time someone looks into doing something similar (live monitoring) for spams.

      Yeah, we really need live monitering stations were people sit and watch/read every email.

      Oh wait we already have that. They just call it Echelon.

      --
      -- "Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains." Jean Jacques Rousseau
  4. TV by khazan · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's almost enough to make me wish that I watched TV.

    almost.

  5. That's not like TiVo... it's like ReplayTV by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The addition of volume-leveling and ad-skipping features seems to imply that this service is going to be closer to the original ReplayTV units rather than TiVo units... ReplayTV of course at one point in time was a sister company of the Rio brand of MP3 players and always has had a reputation of being the "screw the system" DVR as opposed to TiVo who co-operates with advertisers and broadcasters.

  6. who wouldn't pay for no ads by BoFiS · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd pay that just to have advertisements taken out of my daily TV...infact it's one of the main reasons I like the ReplayTV 4000-series, you can just have it skip the ads all-together.

    And for those of you who enjoy commercial breaks so you can run and get more chips or ice cream...remember, you can always just pause it!

  7. Lowering the volume on ads by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Personally, I'd love a feature to automatically lower the volume on ads, to save me doing it manually.

    I have noticed a disturbing trend on British cable TV channels where adverts are considerably louder than the main programmes, presumably to try and grab your attention. In reality, it's just annoying.

    I normally channel surf or watch five minutes of a rolling news channel anyway, although now a lot of channels seem to have syncronised their ad breaks to try and stop you doing that. I expect such a feature would come under a lot of fire here (and probably in Aus too) from the very people who make it necessary.

    One question though: how does it detect adverts?

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re:Lowering the volume on ads by silentbozo · · Score: 5, Informative

      One question though: how does it detect adverts?

      There are two methods that I know of. The first is to measure the sound volume - breaks for advertising often will have a pause in audio, then the actual advertising audio level will usually be higher than the programming audio. There was actually such a project (muting audio from commercials automatically) featured in an electronics magazine a number of years back - try looking up back issues of Popular Electronics.

      The second way is to measure the video signal in much the same way as you would audio. There used to be a blanking interval as the advertisments were cut into the program feed. ReplayTV relies on this, along with the MPEG scene-detection algorithms to determine when a scene starts and stops, and whether that scene is likely to be an advertisement.

      Of course, TV stations are wise to this these days. ReplayTV units often have problems detecting commercials because of the stupid station ID logo burned into the screen - this prevents the screen from going totally black, which usually signals a commercial (not always - I've had my ReplayTV mistakenly cut out a chunk of the program because there was a lightning effect). Also, TV stations have begun putting in sidebars and strips at the top and bottom for advertising and junk messages, which also spoils the commercial detection algorithm, and cross-dissolve to commercials, which eliminates a pause in either the video or audio.

      Checking the sound level seems to be the best bet, and if you can couple that with scene detection, and some sort of intelligent algorithm that figures out that the next 5 scenes are a collection of 30 sec and 1 min spots, and are likely to be commercials, that, I think is the way to go. Of course, if you want to do that, you'd probably have to buffer the programming, which then precludes you from channel surfing.

    2. Re:Lowering the volume on ads by Horizon_99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually the ads aren't louder but they do have more impact. This is mostly due to sound compression, where the softer parts of the ads are raised a few decibels in order to reduce the dynamic range of the sound.

    3. Re:Lowering the volume on ads by pipingguy · · Score: 4, Funny


      Actually the ads aren't louder but they do have more impact. This is mostly due to sound compression, where the softer parts of the ads are raised a few decibels in order to reduce the dynamic range of the sound.

      This is true; the commercials effectively turn the volume of your television up to 11.

    4. Re:Lowering the volume on ads by chewy_2000 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Personally, I'd love a feature to automatically lower the volume on ads, to save me doing it manually.

      RTFA.

      Vogel showed off the majority of the ICE service's functionality at an event in Sydney this morning, including the ability to control the volume level of advertisements (dubbed "ICE Hush") automatically..

  8. For the masses, maybe. by rjch · · Score: 4, Informative
    ...for those of us who read Slashdot, the question becomes "why?" I've had a PVR at home for the past four or five months, ever since I built my MythTV system with KnoppMyth.

    With some old leftover hardware and a $150 TV card, it was ridiculously easy to set up, even though a little Linux experience did help. Sure, the commercial detection is "programmed" and prone to miss commercials or (on occasion) think that the program itself is the commercial, but when it's free and includes most, if not all of what these PVR boxes will, having that "up-to-the-second" information isn't really all that vital.

    1. Re:For the masses, maybe. by B747SP · · Score: 2, Informative
      "up-to-the-second" information isn't really all that vital.

      With respect, I disagree. I too have been playing with a PVR for a few months, but I did the sums in my head (2 x PCI DVB-T tuners, big HDD, fast Pentium 4, motherboard, ram, case, tv-out card, remote control) and went for a commercial product. The Topfield (Toppy) TF5000PVRt cost me just AUD$900, and I couldn't come close to buying the abovementioned hardware for that, even before I got to thinking about the weeks/months of screwing about with an OS and software to make it all work (and probably never, ever get it working just so).

      The commercial product was a pretty easy decision for me. A quick explanation along the lines of "2 x PCI DVB-T tuners at AUD$200 each..." got the spending approval from She Who Must Be Obeyed pretty quickly too!

      Now, I love the Toppy, it works really really well. The standard 80Gb disk is just enough to keep a lot of content while still being small enough to force you to clean up once a week and not letting you accumulate gigs of content you'll never get around to watching (OK, so I'm waiting for the warranty to expire then I'm putting a 300+Gb ATA drive in there!!!). Two digital tuners on board means that you can cat two streams to disk, and watch another pre-recorded stream all at the same time.

      The real problem lies in catching content. The Toppy can synch time to the broadcast time signal from the TV stations, or it can run on your own 'manual' time setting. 'Manual' means that if you have a power failure, you don't recover too well, (until you come home and reset the clock). 'Automatic' puts you very much at the mercy of the TV stations. Toppy owners Australia wide recently suffered when one of the TV stations (allegedly ch10) put the time signal forward three weeks for a little while, then reverted to their version of 'normal'. All the Toppy boxes in the land marked the next three weeks worth or cron jobs as 'done', and didn't record anything for three weeks!

      If you set the time manually, you still get the TV stations starting content 5-10 minutes before or after the published time, so they still manage to make you miss the beginning or the end of your program (and that really sucks with something like Laura Norder or NCSI! (yup, we get all the same programming you Americans do!)). So you set the machine to record +/- 5 minutes of everything. Waste disk space, but you can ffwd through ads, etc of course, don't start watching until 20 mins after the content started, and time shift - all those wonderful things.

      Anyhoo, long story short, I'm with the ICE man (pun!). I think that the two most important things in PVR land *are* knowing when to start and stop cat'ing content to disk, and (less important, but nice) when to pause for advertisements.

      We're starting to get a lot of pay content in various forms here in Australia (presumably the stuff you Seppos have had for years, only ours can't be bypassed with two capacitors and an inductor using these nifty plans for only $9.95!). Most of it just isn't worth the ridiculous prices they're charging for it. This one though, if he's really going to sell it for $10-$12/month, is good - I'm there. If he comes up with a module that runs on my existing Toppy box (this machine does have a bit of third party freeware floating around, upload/install with usb, etc, etc), then I'm there with bells on. Best of luck to 'im!

      --
      I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  9. Re:Smarter than a TiVo... by rjch · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Of course, Austrailia has many fewer total over the air TV stations than the USA does thanks in part to its smaller geographic size, so this service is much more practical there than it is here.
    Spoken like someone who has no idea where Australia is or has the slightest idea how big it is.

    Australia is geographically the same size as the United States, even though it has 1/10th of the population. The fewer number of television stations (3 commercial, 2 government-owned and in some places 1 community) is driven in part by govenment regulation and in part by economics. A country of ~20 million people cannot support the same number of commercial stations as a country of ~200 million.

    Pay TV only arrived in Australia 7 years ago and has only been accessible to most for the past 3-4 years. The ratings for Pay TV are pretty poor, since the commercial free-to-air stations have first pick at a lot of things - sport in particular - to protect people from "having" to pay for TV.

  10. Im not sure if it will be a hit here.. by xxx_Birdman_xxx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm in Australia, and to be honest, we dont really have that much free to air television. We have 5 main stations. One of them is the ABC (government funded), SBS a more multicultural tv station (partly gov funded I think) and three fully commercial stations. The ads we have are mostly on the commercial stations.
    I dont think Australians are real heavy tv watchers, as pay-tv here is no where as popular as it is in other parts of the world. And if people dont want ads, they buy pay-tv services. I wouldn't pay a few dollars a week to record/filter ads from free to air tv. I mainly just turn it off.
    So even thought I could see that this would have a market, I don't think it will be as big as Tivo in the American market.

    --
    Live in your skin. Keep changing the scenery.
    1. Re:Im not sure if it will be a hit here.. by fpga_guy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      And if people dont want ads, they buy pay-tv services. I wouldn't pay a few dollars a week to record/filter ads from free to air tv. I mainly just turn it off.

      I'm not so sure about that - pay tv services here suffer the same extortion racket that they seem to in the US - bundling.

      Until I can order Pay TV a la carte there's no way I'd cough up AUD50+ / month to get collection of crap plus one or two channels of interest.

      But in lieu of that, $2 or 3 per week for ad blocking, plus PVR services? Yes please.

    2. Re:Im not sure if it will be a hit here.. by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Informative

      if people dont want ads, they buy pay-tv services.

      Could that be anymore clueless? 1> You still get ads on the free-to-air channels regardless of whether or not you have cable. 2> All Foxtel channels have commercials.

      Will Tivo in Australia work? I doubt it. But pay-tv is certainly NOT an alternative to get rid of commercials.

    3. Re:Im not sure if it will be a hit here.. by imroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I may be wrong, but my understanding of cable TV here in Australia has been that our population is simply too sparse to support wide-spread roll outs. Foxtel and a few other operators have cable around the big three cities (Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane... what about Perth and Adelaide?) but everywhere else requires satellite. And satellite is an extra hassle, and I'm guessing is more expensive for the operator.

      But I think you're also right about us not being "real heavy tv watchers". I used to get Foxtel when I lived in Sydney and while it had some good things from time to time, it never really engrossed me to a great deal. With the internet, computer games, Triple J radio, a good collection of DVD's, and several gigs of ripped MP3/Vorbis music, the five FTA channels are entertaining enough for me. I never find myself thinking "geez I'm bored and what I'd really like to do right now is flick through 500 channels of crap and vegetate".

      Besides, there's always the D1 Home Media Centre as well as DIY MythTV and Freevo boxen.

  11. Won't happen in New Zealand (Aussie's neighbour) by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While it would be nice to think that a similar service might be implemented here in New Zealand, the chances are virtually zero for one reason:

    Copyright.

    The TV broadcasters consider their program listings to be their intellectual property and that they're protected by copyright.

    Similar copyright cases (both here and in Australia) have been won by the companies which publish other collections of data such as telephone directories (example)

    Anyone who attempts to publish TV program schedules without the permission of the broadcaster (and they charge like wounded bulls for giving such permission) will be set upon by multiple teams of corporate lawyers.

    Of course someone intent on providing a scheduling service for a Tivo-like system could always try and buy the rights to publish those listings but I bet you any money you like that those rights would come with the caveat that ad-blocking was forbidden. After all, advertising revenues are the lifeblood of a free-to-air broadcaster so they're not about to allow someone to provide a service that cuts ads are they?

    Personally I think someone should fight the broadcasters over their copyright claims -- after all, copyright is supposed to protect the presentation, wording and format of data, not the facts on which that data is based.

    If I create listings from scratch and simply include the program title, genre, start and finish times then that information should not be covered by any form of copyright.

    But, fighting the corporate sharks costs lots of money so I doubt we'll see a test-case here in NZ anytime soon.

  12. Re:About time -- but will it be legal? by skribe · · Score: 4, Informative
    Well from what I recall living in Australia, its perfectly legal to record a show to watch later as long as you don't go around distributing the copy.

    Actually, that is not correct. According to this pdf document you need permission from all the copyright holders to legally copy a television show in Australia. There are exceptions (such as educational purposes) but they don't include for personal use only. This still hasn't stopped millions of VCRs (note the R for recorder) from being sold in this country. I doubt it will stop the Aussie version of the Tivo.

    For more information of Australian copyright I suggest The Australian Copyright Council.

    skribe

    --
    Blog
  13. Re:Europe by boogy+nightmare · · Score: 2, Informative

    TiVo has been to Europe, It was in the UK for sale for a couple of years but has since retracted it due to terrible sales, those that actually have still have a limited service i beleive. Then of course there is Sky+ which is a satellite box with 2 decoders, one for viewing and one for recording that works exacly the same way as TiVo but is offered by the BskyB corp.

    --
    Kingdom of Loathing (www.kingdomofloathing.com) Addicted is me
  14. Re:its a service? by carnivore302 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's much more. You can record and watch the beginning of a movie while the movie is still on. It will learn your viewing habits and automatically record all the shows you tend to watch, for up to 140 hours. It's sort of a search engine for your TV really. Plus you can view your photo's and listen to your music on the TV via the tivo. You'll want one :-)


    Click on the Mystery Futures Link!

    --
    Please login to access my lawn
  15. (nothing to see here.. move along) by slittle · · Score: 3, Funny
    launching initially in Sydney, Newcastle and Wollongong.
    Woohoo! Suck it, Melbourne!

    regards,
    Sydney.
    --
    Opportunity knocks. Karma hunts you down.
    1. Re:(nothing to see here.. move along) by anty · · Score: 2, Funny

      don't think many ppl round here r gonna get that joke.

      least we don't have the mardi gras :P

  16. Re:Smarter than a TiVo... by NoMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Hey, I'd be happy if the TV stations transmitted a real program guide in their digital streams - not just shitty "NOW / NEXT" data, or sometimes an even shittier separate "Program Guide" video channel.

    Hell, I'd be happy enough if the NOW / NEXT info was accurate. Though the info from the ABC, at least here in Brisbane, is within a second or two - when it's working, that is...

    Note for Americans : Australia, in the capital cities, has 5 FTA stations:
    • the ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) - government-owned, considered to be left-leaning regardless of whoever is in power, but probably more central than left. Programming consists of everything from mainly British shows to innovative local productions - which usually never achieve popularity until they are head-hunted / ripped off and mangled by one of the 3 commercial stations. Ad-less (well, internal ads only, between programs)
    • SBS (Special Broadcasting Service) - known as "Sex Before Sleep" by people who think the word "knickers" is rude and funny. Nominally a "multicultural" station (in the best sense of the word), plays everything from PBS news and documentaries, through comedy (South Park, Daily Show, etc), anime, non-mainstream sport (soccer, Tour de France, etc), to "European" movies ;-) Semi-commercial - government sponsored, but with commercial advertising between programs.
    • 7, 9, & 10 - the 3 commercial channels. One's tied up with AOL, another's tied up with Microsoft / MSN, and the other one has no money so runs "The Simpsons" on a mobius loop interspersed with "Big Brother", "Australian Idol", and even less-successful local reality TV. All run as many programs as they can fit in between the ads...

    Thankfully, we don't really have a Fox, though Ch9 comes close - without the soaring eagle and giant phallic missile graphics...
    --
    What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
  17. Re:Smarter than a TiVo... by martinX · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm an Australian too by the way, and I find that most foreigners don't underestimate the size of Australia (it's pretty evident by looking at a globe) but are surprised by it's low population.

    I find that most foreigners don't underestimate the size of Australia, but a lot of Septics overestimate the size of the USA.

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  18. The same guy who did the Fairlight. Cool! by adam872 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Peter Vogel built this awesome instrument (with his business partner Kim Ryrie) called the Fairlight. It was to the best of my knowledge, the first sampler and can be heard on dozens of albums, particularly from the eighties. Even with the advances of audio technology in the last 10-15 years, I still drool over the Series III.

    http://www.ghservices.com/gregh/fairligh/

    In any case (and back on topic), I hope he has better luck business wise this time. As was typical with great engineers with good ideas at that time (think Clive Sinclair) they never had the acumen to cash in on their great technology. Those MBA graduates do sometimes come in handy :)

  19. Re:Smarter than a TiVo... by rev063 · · Score: 2, Informative
    ... most foreigners don't underestimate the size of Australia (it's pretty evident by looking at a globe) ...
    Unfortunately, most people don't learn about other contries by looking at a globe (when was the last time you looked at one?) -- they look at a map. World maps in 2-D can be pretty misleading. Many people see the Mercator projection, which does make the US look bigger than Australia (especially if country borders are not included). Compare the difference in an equal-area projection map.