Slashdot Mirror


Probe to 'Look Inside' Asteroids

bigjnsa500 writes "A new space mission concept by the European Space Agency called Deep Interior was unveiled at a Paris conference earlier this week, according to the BBC. Apparently: 'It aims to look inside asteroids to reveal how they are made. Deep Interior would use radar to probe the origin and evolution of two near-Earth objects less than 1km across. The mission, which could launch some time later this decade, would also give clues to how the planets evolved.' NASA also has a similar concept called Deep Impact."

118 comments

  1. Probe? Roids? by Neil+Blender · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cue the uranus jokes:

    wait for it...

    GO!

    1. Re:Probe? Roids? by Rosyna · · Score: 1

      With a name like "Deep Impact", how can you not make uranus jokes?

      Too bad I have none. Still laughing at "Deep Impact". Too bad the man believed to be Deep Throat died recently (Today?).

    2. Re:Probe? Roids? by onosendai · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obligatory Futurama Quote:

      Fry: Hey, as long as you don't make me smell Uranus. (laughs)
      Leela: I don't get it.
      Professor: I'm sorry, Fry, but astronomers renamed Uranus in 2620 to end that stupid joke once and for all.
      Fry: Oh. What's it called now?
      Professor: Urectum. Here, let me locate it for you.
      Fry: Hehe, no, no, I think I'll just smell around a bit over here.

      --
      <? include ('signature.inc'); ?>
    3. Re:Probe? Roids? by SEWilco · · Score: 0

      No, Linda Lovelace was not a man.

    4. Re:Probe? Roids? by panaceaa · · Score: 0

      No kidding. I read up to "Probe to 'Look Inside' As..." and I had read enough. I didn't even know there were roids involved! How disgusting!

    5. Re:Probe? Roids? by Alien+Being · · Score: 1, Funny

      A five year mission, to seek out new worlds, new civilizations, to boldly go ... where? Hey, what happened to the Venus plan?

    6. Re:Probe? Roids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cue the Zoolander jokes....
      all I could think of was.
      "Wait, they're _inside_ the computer?"

    7. Re:Probe? Roids? by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 1

      King Ghidora, God of Space, Asteroids, and Mass Extinction, would like to inform Earth's space agencies that they are welcome to probe the interior of space rocks, but they are not welcome to probe his interior. Failure to comply with this order will result in all life on Earth being extinguished. Because He rules!

      Godzilla: No, I rule the world!

      Mothra: Boys, I rule: you!

      King Ghidora: No, I...

      Godzilla: Better behave. Remember what happened last time?

      King Ghidora: Er, yeah. You totally rule, Mothra!

      Godzilla: Yeah, same here!

      Mothra: That's better. I'd hate to have to spend my birthday tomorrow beating up on one of you. I may be the Goddess of Peace, but I must agree that there are definite perks to being "the Mightiest Monster in all Creation". Note to self: be sure to thank the nice boys in PR that thought that one up. ;)

      "Why do you need to be fit when we're gonna make Godzilla disappear up his own butt hole, huh?"
      Kudo, "Godzilla vs. Megaguirus", US version
      Duh, that's "black hole", you dim-witted dubbers! The Japanese track uses the English words!

  2. show of hands by atarione · · Score: 1

    everyone who think the scientists that created this probe have not heard enough "ass-teroid probe jokes"

    --
    actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
  3. So wait... by aklix · · Score: 1

    They are launching a probe INTO the astroid? Are they crazy? jeez, what people will do for the name of science.

    -----

    1. Re:So wait... by kfg · · Score: 0

      They are launching a probe INTO the astroid?

      I predict they'll find. . .more asteroid.

      Unless they get lucky and find the one with caramel in the center on the first try.

      KFG

    2. Re:So wait... by geekoid · · Score: 1, Funny

      as long as it's not nugat.
      If it's nugat, they'll have to look around to see if anyone is watching, and then put it back.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:So wait... by gartogg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On the 4th of July 2005, NASA is creating a large explosion visible to amateur astronomers everywhere; you can even see a video of how the explosion will look, sending a 800 lb (iirc) probe into a comet at 10 m/s (I'm sure of the speed.)

      But this isn't just flashy, no, we want to, uhhh to,
      AHA!
      See what the inside looks like, so we need to blow a hole in it. On July 4th. This coming year.

      --
      I'm a concientious .sig objector.
    4. Re:So wait... by socsuj · · Score: 1

      They are launching a probe INTO the astroid? Are they crazy? jeez, what people will do for the name of science.

      Doesn't the headline say they're using radar?

  4. I looked into an Asteroids once by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 5, Funny

    Found a bunch of quarters.

    1. Re:I looked into an Asteroids once by rde · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are you sure they were quarters? I thought most asteroids had a high nickel content.

    2. Re:I looked into an Asteroids once by SnoBall · · Score: 0

      ... and found a bunch of crappy vector graphics.

      --
      Don't eat me ... *looks at nickname* ... okay, eat me.
    3. Re:I looked into an Asteroids once by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 1, Funny

      Are you sure they were quarters? I thought most asteroids had a high nickel content.

      There's a token.

    4. Re:I looked into an Asteroids once by iamcf13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And found a challenging videogame from 1979 with laughably primitive graphics compared to today's braindead fighting/shooting/driving games with their fantastic, lifelike graphics.... :P

    5. Re:I looked into an Asteroids once by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 1

      Quarters are 8.33% nickel. Not quite as high as the nickel content of those five-cent coins (25%), but still pretty high.

      --
      Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
    6. Re:I looked into an Asteroids once by grd000 · · Score: 1

      Well, I've played enough games of Asteroids to know that they're made of the same stuff inside as outside.

    7. Re:I looked into an Asteroids once by rocketsled · · Score: 1

      Ooooh, look more rock!

  5. So NASA is using movie names? by NightWulf · · Score: 4, Funny
    So at this rate let's see what NASA's future projects are:

    Project Lord of the Rings (2012, Probe to check out the rings of Saturn)

    Project Pluto Nash (2009, A giant probe/bomb to send to the planetoid Pluto in hopes of melting the ice)

    Project Mercury Rising (2015, Mission to send an autistic austronaut to Mercury to see if it really is as hot as they think)

    Come on people, what other movie names can fit in well with future NASA missions?

    1. Re:So NASA is using movie names? by 0racle · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Perfect Storm - Measurements of Jupiter's Great Red Spot
      Red Heat - Terraforming Mars
      The Phantom Menace - Cataloging Black Holes
      Clear and Present Danger - Tracking Near Earth Asteroids

      Sorry but I really have nothing better to do.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    2. Re:So NASA is using movie names? by rokzy · · Score: 1, Funny

      Project Apollo 13 to um.... d'oh!

    3. Re:So NASA is using movie names? by SEWilco · · Score: 4, Funny
      • Spiderman: Space elevator construction.
      • Catwoman: Space elevator climbing.
      • Fahrenheit 9/11: Testing of temperature measurement and conversion methods.
      • Dude, Where's my Car?: Examination of Apollo lunar relics.
      • I, Robot: Self-controlled self-directed probe searching for Philosopher's Stone.
      • Control Room: Simulator of Control Room.
      • The Day After Tomorrow: Government daily project scheduling research.
      • Dodgeball: Moving Earth out of the way of asteroids
      • Harold & Kumar Go To White Castle: Dual mission to test gas giant atmospheric fueling.
      • A Home At The End Of The World: Antarctic Mars outpost simulation.
      • The Hunting Of The President: Annual NASA budget approvals.
      • Man On Fire: Launch pad safety testing.
      • The Manchurian Candidate: Racing China to the Moon.
      • Maria Full of Grace: Space burial missions.
      • Natural Disaster: First mission to film an Earth-impact asteroid.
      • Natural Distaster: Final mission to film an Earth-impact asteroid.
      • Raising Helen: Launch of perfect mission to Trojan orbits.
      • Sleepover: Concurrent artificial hibernation experiments.
      • The Stepford Wives: Mission combining best of human and robotic technologies.
      • The Story of the Weeping Camel: Lunar water extraction mission.
      • Super Size Me: Food production from carbonaceous asteroid.
      • The Terminal: Orbital spaceport.
      • Thunderbirds: Rescue squad.
      • Troy: Gold extraction mission to asteroid.
      • Van Helsing: Orbital assembly of probe from pieces of old probes.
      • The Village: First Lunar maternity ward.
      • White Chicks: Underground lunar aquatic recreation facility.
      • White Heat: Mercury rover mission.
      • Little Black Book: Mission scheduling system.
      • Alien vs. Predator: Mission to make two asteroids collide.
      • We Don't Live Here Anymore: Probe to document effects after first Earth impact asteroid.
      • Without A Paddle: Experiments in zero-gravity propulsion by astronaut in large enclosed space.
      • Exorcist: The Beginning: First mission to hold an umbrella between warming Earth and the Sun.
      • Remember Me, My Love: Archive library mission before first Earth-impact asteroid.
      • Bright Young Things: Meteors caused by human space debris.
      • The Brown Bunny: Lunar coprolites.
      • Hero: NASA lobbyist.
      • Vanity Fair: Satellite whose primary instrument is a telescope which examines its own reflection on terrestrial smooth surfaces.
      • Last Life In The Universe: Ongoing reality show on NASA TV
      • The Cookout: Automated management of rotation for the cooling of space habitats.
      • Head In The Clouds: NASA mission statement.
      • Taxi: Rutan outsourcing
      • Shall We Dance: Phobos/Deimos sampling mission.
      • Flight of the Phoenix: International Space Station emergency escape plan.
      • After the Sunset: Post-terminator tracking probe.
      • Terminator 2: Second post-terminator tracking probe.
      • House of Flying Daggers: Saturn ring fly-through mission.
      • The Woodsman: Android to be sent ahead of manned mission to prepare site and then await discovery.
      • Proof: Global temperature measurement mission.
      • Fat Albert: Orion drive test using proven "Fat Man" technology.
      • Are We There Yet?: Mission status monitoring system.
    4. Re:So NASA is using movie names? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't forget:
      • Red Planet: Sending humans to Mars
      • The Ghost of Mars: Fleeing from Mars
  6. Re:Deep Impact . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I would hazard a guess that you be on the receiving end of said impact?

  7. Point please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    And one day in history class we will all learn about the day that NASA went out of business because they spent all of their money on pointless things like this. When they finally finish their research they will wonder what they will actually do with the information and wonder what idiot came up with the idea in the first place.

    1. Re:Point please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lemme guess ... you are a PERL "programmer".

    2. Re:Point please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, PHP and HTML.

    3. Re:Point please by MikeCapone · · Score: 4, Informative

      Maybe if you don't know what they are doing and why they are doing it, you should read on it instead of saying that because it doesn't immediately jump at you it's pointless.

      For an interesting (and fairly simple) read, I suggest Carl Sagan's Pale Blue Dot. It covers many many things including why space exploration is important for us (for example, we found out about the ozone layer and what CFCs were doing by looking at Mars and about the Greenhouse effect by looking at Venus -- stuff that was totally unrelated at first).

    4. Re:Point please by grepistan · · Score: 1

      I think spending money on 'pointless things' is pretty much what NASA does. I don't really think that sending people to Mars or investigating Saturn's moons seems all that useful initially, but who knows when it might come in handy? If you want to be negative about it, you could say that NASA have done nothing but waste money in their entire history. After all, the US-Soviet Space Race was more or less an international pissing competition... but at least it kept that money from being directly spent on weapons.

      --
      Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
      -- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather
    5. Re:Point please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The point is that it's raining soup out there in the asteroid belt, and people like you are down here bitching that buckets are too expensive to bother with.

      Do a little research to find out the content of a typical asteroid, it's mass, and what that's equivalent to in Earthside ore production and refined metals.

      When your jaw quits bouncing off the floor, start pushing for big, manned asteroid missions so we can finally quit raping garden Earth, and in the bargain there will be more than enough resources for everyone to start living like humans should!

      3...2...1...
      Mal the Elder

    6. Re:Point please by jfdawes · · Score: 1

      bzzt.

      No one with the money to afford putting together a manned asteroid mining mission has any interest in "everyone living like humans should"

  8. Wow by OOO0000OO0O0 · · Score: 0

    I hope they step up the technolgy and use the latest nuclear warheads on teh asteroids. Come to think of it, we could detonate several of these every Fourth of July and have a video available for streaming. Would certainly be a fun way to use nuclear weapons. Although the cost is too great...:(

    Or it could be privately funded and we could have real-life Asteroids (game). Mining asteroids...mmm.

    1. Re:Wow by SnoBall · · Score: 0
      Or it could be privately funded and we could have real-life Asteroids (game). Mining asteroids...mmm.
      Whatever we find ... give it to NASA and make those voyueristic nerds pay up ... ... ... in quarters.
      --
      Don't eat me ... *looks at nickname* ... okay, eat me.
  9. Deep inside huh.... by icedcool · · Score: 0

    Any body gotten the asteroids consent?
    If somebody used a probe to look deep inside you... wouldn't you want them to have asked first?

    --
    Most people aren't thought about after they're gone. "I wonder where Rob got the plutonium" is better than most get.
  10. Re:Me too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're just getting your first deep impact 30 days *after* the child is born something tells me it ain't your kid. Wife hm?

    (Just joking of course, seriously, congrats on fatherhood).

  11. Wrecking spaceships. by kaoshin · · Score: 1

    That must be a fun job. I can just picture all the people trying to look serious standing around at mission control going pchearrrrbooommm.

  12. Yeah.. but... by Sheepdot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When are they going to send a probe to Uranus?

    And I mean that in every nice way possible. There's actually a reason to study some of the moons there.

    1. Re:Yeah.. but... by snake_dad · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Possible launch in 2008 or 2009. The idea is to build a sistership to the Pluto New Horizons mission, maybe adding some new instrumentation. But AFAICT this is just speculation, and not actually a planned mission (yet). Even New Horizons itself could still be axed to free funds for the Moon/Mars stuff.

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
  13. Deep Impact by sssmashy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nasa has a similar mission - Deep Impact - which will blow a hole in the comet Tempel 1 and measure the effects.

    I'm pretty sure the NASA mission's title - Deep Impact - is partly a homage to the movie of the same name. For all of its flaws, the movie's producers did consult with NASA and make a sincere effort to get the science right.

    Armageddon - the Bruce Willis/Ben Affleck flick that was the other asteroid picture that summer - spent zillions on special effects, but botched the science so badly that astronomers were seen choking on their popcorn. As I recall the plot and acting were equally wretched - but the movie was a success at the box office. There's no accounting for taste.

    1. Re:Deep Impact by andymar · · Score: 1, Funny

      How many science flaws can you find in Deep Impact, the movie ?

  14. Why don't they take the easy route by LS · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And send a rag-tag deep core drilling team to do the job?

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  15. Beagle 2 was the prototype by SalsaDot · · Score: 1

    but the comms system didn't survive the impact.

  16. Re:Deep Impact . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sound of you failing it.

    YFI

  17. Hmm by aklix · · Score: 1

    I wonder if asteroid is a delecacy on other planets...

  18. radar vs. ground by huxrules · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't knw what kind of radar these guys are planning to send. But GPR (ground penetrating radar) only goes a few meters. I seriously doubt that they are going to launch an AGEIS system. All this proves- manned space flight (while possibly silly) is terribly better at geology. Why? We got shovels sukka.

    1. Re:radar vs. ground by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      Maybe they'll send up a neutrino observatory and image the rock with a Macroscope.

  19. Naming? by Jameth · · Score: 1

    Why is it that the American name is cheesy and inaccurate and the European name is cheesy and repetitive and both names are chock-full of sexual innuendo? Can nobody find good names these days?

    I vote for renaming the project to "Looking In Rocks", just for the sake of simplicity.

    1. Re:Naming? by aklix · · Score: 1

      Deep Impact... I think it's kinda catchy. (SCO starts a law suit over anyone who uses it)

  20. Do It Right by SEWilco · · Score: 1, Funny
    I'd prefer a mission where the inside of an asteroid is examined by taking it apart.

    How many grad students can fit in a Space Shuttle cargo bay?

  21. so let me get this straight.. by CFD339 · · Score: 0

    In one message, we have:

    Hilton and a deep interior probe.

    And they're getting funding for this?

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  22. What's in the asteroid? by Television+Set · · Score: 1

    They will find hunks of rock and crap inside. If they are lucky they might find some other crap, but if its valuable crap it will most likely be left alone for years as it would be far too expensive to mine it.

    --
    EOF
  23. More like... by causality · · Score: 1
    Deep Interior would use radar to probe the origin and evolution of two near-Earth objects less than 1km across. The mission, which could launch some time later this decade, would also give clues to how the planets evolved.'


    In all likelihood, more like "give clues to how the planets didn't evolve. Answers tend to lead to more questions that way.
    --
    It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    1. Re:More like... by WegianWarrior · · Score: 1

      Ah, but if we can say with more certanty how they didn't evolve, that tells us more about how they did evolve.
      As an analogy, lets say someone tells you that a friend of you drives a car that is either yellow, white or gray. A while later, you are told that the car your friend is driving is not yellow. While you still are not certain if it's white or gray, you have ruled out that it might be yellow - thus advancing your knowledge a certain degree.
      By eliminating some of the options, we home in on the plausible truth of how the solar system came into beeing.

      --
      Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    2. Re:More like... by causality · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My whole point to my comment was to highlight the extreme complexity of the question, and in view of that complexity, I believed the article's statement to be a tad unrealistic.
      (end logic-only response)

      A lot of this comes from my belief that we will get to the heart of the mystery of existence (of planets, of us, of anything) by looking within instead of believing that mere observation, which by its nature is altered by the very act of observing (something that many philosophies have said since long before Heisenberg), is going to give us the really fundamental answers we seek if only we do it enough. Don't get me wrong - science is a wonderful thing that I embrace fully, but it tends to be more useful for problems relating to everyday life than it does for anything really fantastic like coming up with a certain understanding of the mysteries of life. To me this is another case of "the right tool for the job."

      I hope it is plain that it's a simple matter of looking without vs. looking within -- neither is at all useless just because one of them has a much more objective nature and can therefore be PROVEN to be useful.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    3. Re:More like... by causality · · Score: 1
      Ah, but if we can say with more certanty how they didn't evolve, that tells us more about how they did evolve. As an analogy, lets say someone tells you that a friend of you drives a car that is either yellow, white or gray.


      Unfortunately it was after my last post but I just came up with another, much simpler response to your analogy. Answering the question that the article talks about is more like saying, "a friend drives a car that is not grey, and according to our latest findings, does not appear to be yellow either. But my graphics card can display 16.4 million colors, and I know it's probably in there somewhere."

      It's a bit like when they describe a drug's effects. There are positive and negative (and neutral) effects. A positive effect would be along the lines of "made me see something that was not there." A negative effect would be like "person X always annoys the piss out of me, but while on this drug they didn't." Learning how planets did NOT come to be is a negative advance, which helps because it lets us stop wasting resources exploring theoretical dead-ends. However, the real ground-breaking advances in knowledge were mostly positive, adding knowledge that was not there before.
      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    4. Re:More like... by Razor+Blades+are+Not · · Score: 1

      The job we're talking about is working out how planets may have evolved.

      And you think the right tool is soul-searching introspection?

      That's the kind of attitude that put man firmly on the couch, not the Moon.

  24. Lots of points in fact... by WegianWarrior · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just to clarefy - the mission that are talked about is an ESA mission.. y'know, those guys that ain't NASA, nor russkies or from Red China? Anyway, thats really beside the point here.


    I judge from your comment, you seem to think that learning about space for the sake of knowledge is not worth it... well, the other option is to learn about space with an eye to make money out of it. It has quite often been proposed that it ought to be possible to mine astroids for raw materials to use in space (build spacestations, spaceships and whatnot in space) or on earth. In order to do this, we need a better understanding on how an astroid is put together - thus this mission.

    As for the NASA mission briefly mentioned, thats a completly different mission; it seeks to learn more about comets and how they are made up. While less than ideal for mining, this is important also - not just for the pure science (a concept I think you may find hard to understand) but because we one day may need to alter the orbit / blow up a comet that are on a collisioncourse with earth. If we don't know how it is put together, we're in a worse situation to do just that.

    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    1. Re:Lots of points in fact... by barakn · · Score: 1
      the mission that are talked about is an ESA mission.. y'know, those guys that ain't NASA,

      RTFA. It was a proposal to NASA. I wish /. story submitters and editors would RTFA, too.

      --
      "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    2. Re:Lots of points in fact... by Sheepdot · · Score: 1

      I like your sig. I used to have one that went:

      "The entire world is now dominated by one group, of which, no one who will ever read this has any recourse."

  25. How about past projects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Project Take The Money And Run (1996-2001, the X-33 that went way over it's billion dollar budget but literally never got off the ground)

  26. from the truth-in-advertising dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An anonymous coward writes: "NASA today announced that its latest space probe, Waste of Money IV, successfully impacted on the asteroid's surface, breaking into a million pieces, each worth approximately $50. The ESA probe with a similar goal, Disaster Waiting to Happen II, exploded two months earlier on the launchpad."

  27. I think, it's by grepistan · · Score: 1

    because robots and computers don't get drunk or make passes at each other. And because the film-makers wanted less wooden actors, possibly.

    great sig, by the way!

    --
    Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
    -- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather
    1. Re:I think, it's by tepples · · Score: 1, Funny

      And because the film-makers wanted less wooden actors, possibly.

      I guess that explains why filmmakers can't seem to make a decent interpretation of Collodi's The Adventures of Pinocchio.

  28. I know what's in asteroids.. by evilmousse · · Score: 0, Redundant


    I've been inside asteroids once, and the only thing worthwhile I found were some quarters...

  29. Re:Deep Impact . . by DigiShaman · · Score: 0

    Because by virtue of being Anonymous, you are by default a troll or flamer untill proven otherwise. And you logged onto slashdot and made that silly comment, it too might have gotten modded +5.

    It's Slashdot for ya, live with it. heh

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  30. Origins as Alibi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else noticed that a lot of recent space project proposals state the purpose is to learn more about how planets or even the entire solar system was formed?

    Is this just fashionable or a ploy to get funding?

    1. Re:Origins as Alibi by peter303 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >>>>Anyone else noticed that a lot of recent space project proposals state the purpose is to learn more about how planets or even the entire solar system was formed? Is this just fashionable or a ploy to get funding?>>>>>

      Knowledge of origins would help constrain the nature of solar systems about other stars. This would tell us how frequently planets inhabitable by humans occur, and planets where there might be intelligent life.
      Ironically, were can only see "extreme planets" now with the limited sensitivity of earth-bound detectors. Of the 200-some discovered so far, only the grossly large (several times Jupiter) or super fast (weeks-long orbits) cause measurable doppler shifts their stars. The next generation(s) of space-based detectors will find more earth-like planets.

  31. Deep Impact quite different. by Aspherical+Cow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, Deep Impact (NASA came up with the name before the movie, by the way) is quite different. Half of the Deep Impact spacecraft will actually ram into a comet (not an asteroid) in an attempt to churn up material from inside the comet. This is so the other half of the spacecraft, as well as telescopes on Earth, can see what is the composition, density, etc. of comets.

  32. Is anyone else disturbed? by ThoreauHD · · Score: 1

    Have you guys noticed all of these agencies suddenly not just planning to make craft that can detonate an asteroid, but that are making one right now. Yea, like right now. I count 3 G7 governments and 1 UN so far over the world.

    Can somebody tell us when this fat bitch is going to ram a hole through the earth? Just in case my 2012-2014 calculation is off?

    Seriously folks. This isn't academic anymore. People that don't spend money on shit for space travel are building these ships to kill an asteroid. A complete exercise is fulitiy at our current tech level, which is making me wonder- what/when the fuck is it gonna hit us?

    1. Re:Is anyone else disturbed? by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Have you guys noticed all of these agencies suddenly not just planning to make craft that can detonate an asteroid

      Nope. Might be something to do with the fact that nobody is planning a craft that can detonate an asteroid...

      but that are making one right now.

      ... much less building one. Plenty of folks are indeed designing and building craft designed to ram into a rock, but the only side in those collisions taking damage is the probe. Pure research.

      Yea, like right now. I count 3 G7 governments and 1 UN so far over the world.

      I count 0 governments with capabilities for building a craft that can "detonate" a km+ asteroid. Unsurprisingly, 0 is also the number actually doing it.

      Can somebody tell us when this fat bitch is going to ram a hole through the earth? Just in case my 2012-2014 calculation is off?

      I guess the 1/300 change of 1950DA hitting in 2880 has not been withdrawn, but it's kind of early to worry about that baby yet...

      Seriously folks. This isn't academic anymore. People that don't spend money on shit for space travel are building these ships to kill an asteroid.

      And that's where you get it wrong, considering the very futility you mention, academic is only outcome of these projects. They don't build ships to kill an asteroid, they build ships to kill itself and look how the asteroid reacts to it, just in case we really need to deflect one, sometime in the future.

      Having a little bit of knowledge about of what and how it's made sure is nice to have, especially with little advance warning, which is (partly, of course that knowledge also comes handy if we plan to start mining the asteroids or otherwise using them at some point) why were trying to get that knowledge.

      And when that eventually happens, nobody will be building a ship to "kill" or blow up an asteroid, because that's about the most stupid thing you could do to one. If you don't blow it very early it's still going to hit you, only in pieces, but still having the same kinetic energy. Modifying the rock to have some kind of propulsion system (slap a rocket into it, put few ion drives or railguns and solar panels there using the asteroid's own matter as reaction mass, send a giant mirror/looking glass to orbit it and focus sunlight so slowly boils rock off, tether it to a solar sail... whatever) is cheaper, easier, and much more likely to work than trying to bomb it.

    2. Re:Is anyone else disturbed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Detonating the asteroid is just a distraction. After all, if you hit it, it will just break in two and then you've got even more problems.

      These ships are really meant to go after the alien craft hiding behind the asteroids. Especially the fast, little ones.

  33. NASA Press Conference by jav1231 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Well, we've managed to get the probe on the asteroid. This 1.2billion dollar mining probe has worked flawlessly. After 6 months of drilling some 300meters into the surface of the asteroid we can finally report that the asteriod core is made up of the same rock that it's crust is made of. Thank you."

  34. Didn't they just do this? by 955301 · · Score: 2, Funny


    My understanding is that Euro-space just recently buried a probe into the asteriod 'Mars'. Aren't they still waiting to get data back from that one?

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    1. Re:Didn't they just do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd mod that one up if I had some points. Funny stuff :)

  35. We already know what's inside asteroids... by DingoBueno · · Score: 1

    ...several smaller asteroids. And inside those? You guessed it: more, smaller, asteroids.

    --
    ascii art
  36. I'd like to send a probe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to Paris (Hilton)

  37. Only 2 Astorids? by LifesABeach · · Score: 0

    why go to just 2 of the rocks?

    seeing that the ESA is still in a 'planning' mode. what would the impact be to just orbit outside the belt and map ALL of the rocks locations, rotations, orbits, and xray each one for compisition?

    i think that the results of the above type of survey would be more informational than just sampling 2 far away boulders.

  38. Numerous errors in /. story by barakn · · Score: 2, Informative
    A new space mission concept by the European Space Agency called Deep Interior was unveiled

    The original BBC article was poorly written, but from it we learn something closer to the truth: "A proposal for the project, described here at the Committee on Space Research (Cospar) scientific assembly, was submitted to Nasa two weeks ago." It's a NASA mission, not an ESA mission.

    NASA also has a similar concept called Deep Impact

    Wrong. The article was comparing an ESA mission called Don Quijote to Deep Impact. Deep Interior and Deep Impact are very different. One will try to blast an enormous crater in an asteroid, and the other will passively scan an asteroid with radar.

    --
    "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
  39. They should probe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this.
    --
    Putting the ass in asteroid since 1996

  40. YOUR WIFE==SLUT, KID==MINE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  41. Re:Me too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "My wife just had a baby and I'm planning my first deep impact in over 30 days!"

    Ever wonder what the two other holes are for?

  42. HRC sponsoring this? by geekpuppySEA · · Score: 1

    on that common-denominator-humor option: I'm glad to see that the Human Rights Commission is finally taking an interest in ... oh, nevermind.

    --
    Intelligent Design: because MATH is HARD.
  43. That no asteroid probe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have a project invoving looking inside a floating rock in space by means of penetration, that will be ASSteroid probing!

  44. If you don't believe me by barakn · · Score: 1

    check this or pdf version out.

    --
    "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
  45. In America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a nickel is 5 cents.

  46. At least I know the truth by barakn · · Score: 1

    Judging from the fact that they rejected the corrected story I submitted, the slashdot editors are more interested in covering their own behinds than they are in true and accurate news. I'd be far more impressed if somebody 'fessed up to not properly reading the article.

    --
    "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
  47. No shit, Sherlock. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0