Slashdot Mirror


DEFCON WiFi Shootout Winners Set A Land Record

bscience writes "While attending the DEFCON 12 convention this past weekend I had the chance to see the standing ovation a group of 19 year olds received for establishing a 55.1 mile unamplified WiFi connection!" A snippet from the Wired story linked there: "Mobile warriors having trouble making a wireless connection across the hall might want to give some Ohio teens a call. This weekend they were able to make a 55-mile Wi-Fi connection. ... They might have achieved an even greater distance, Justin Rigling said, "but there was no road left."" (Here's the post from a few weeks back about the competition.)

39 of 161 comments (clear)

  1. No really. by ItsIllak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't get this. I've got a smallish house, but need two APs to cover it. I guess I'm considerably less directional, but still?!

    Maybe these competitions could open up a second record of the largest diameter of coverage achieved. Maybe measured at four opposite points.

    1. Re:No really. by 5m477m4n · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Some brands of APs have better range than others. I get pretty good range from Linksys. Also, APs generally get batter range than wireless routers. But sometimes it's nice having a smaller range, that way the guy down the street can't hack your connection or hijack your cable internet.

      --

      ---
      Those who can, do
      Those who can't, teach
      Those who don't know how, supervise
    2. Re:No really. by DaHat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Might I suggest bring in a demo man to remove all of your walls and anything else that may, depending on your location in the house be anywhere near the line of sight of the signal that could conceivably interfere with it?

      I have not RTFA, however if I remember last years competition right, the competing antennas were on the side of a large hill or mountain pointing down at a vehicle that was driving away. In such a case they have far fewer obstacles then you do in your home.

    3. Re:No really. by gizmik · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ou should check your WiFi cards too. My Intel Centrino laptop's wifi just sucks. First I too thought that I have a poor AP, but after buying a cheap USB dongle, I had much better signal and no disconnects.

    4. Re:No really. by v1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Omnidirectional coverage is a bit harder to expand. You can't really beat a 5/8 wavelength groundplane, and they're easy to make. (at lower frequencies anyway, not sure about ghz)

      Not counting the ability to use amplifiers, you could think of wifi coverage as light... put a 100w lightbulb in a field at night and how far away can you be and stil read a book? Not very far probably... 30 feet maybe. Now, take that bulb and put it in a parabolic lens. Now you've got a 100w flashlight. If the flashlight is pointed your way, you'll get hundreds of feet. The better the lens and the sharper the focus, the greater your range. Come up with a more fundamental improvement (like a 100w laser?) and your range increases to a radical distance that could easily be miles. But it still doesn't help the guy standing 5 feet off to the side of the light though, he's in the dark.

      Directional and omnidirectional coverage are for totally different purposes, and really can't be compared or mixed. There's no use in complaining about your omni coverage when people are making improvements in directional coverage - it's apples and oranges.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    5. Re:No really. by Mr+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All this is true and valid, but it still doesn't fix the problem that it's only marginally usefull, while people would pay big money for a good way to repeat passed walls more cheaply than sticking another AP wired to the LAN on the other side of it.

    6. Re:No really. by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nahh, it's easy to significantly increse the coverage in a home without much work. In many of the high-brow homes I help a friend of mine install home automation and whole house multimedia I do the networking on the side. One AP can easily cover most fo a 2000Sq foot home. but you need to place the AP in regards to where it will be used most.

      rule 1 - make it central to the house. If you use it mostly in your den at the south end of the house then the AP will be in the celing, about 6 feet from the office in the hallway. if your home is larger, buying a pair of low end aftermarket antennas and spreading out the antennas makes a bigger difference. In one home i had the AP in the kitchen, 1 antenna 6 feet from that location and th eother 3 feet in the opposite direction. Adding a 1 foot square piece of sheet metal about 1 wavelength away from the antenna in the direction of the outside wall will also help in two ways. 1 to limit the external radiation to the neighbors. (the best wireless security is to be sure they cant get a signal) and 2 to reflect the signal back to the working area.

      I have covered houses of 4000 sq feet with 1 AP and 2 comp-usa grade add-on antennas. no you will not get 100% in all areas of the home, but you will not drop below 40% and some places like the bottom of the closet in the basement guest bedroom do not need woreless coverage.

      being realistic about wireless coverage is the first step. the second step is to use the 802.11 repeaters when you only absolutely have to.

      but in a home for rich people... multiple AP'
      s are not a viable option as it doesn't hand off seamlessly.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:No really. by Trigun · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have an Averatec laptop with built in Wi-fi and a D-link 514 Router on the 2nd floor of my house. I get 100% coverage inside my house, and can even go four or so houses in any direction. My SMC 802.11a/b card doesn't get me off my front porch.

    8. Re:No really. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Informative


      but in a home for rich people... multiple AP'
      s are not a viable option as it doesn't hand off seamlessly.


      There are some that do, model numbers escape me. Or it might be the card and software that automatically switches APs to the best one.

      Not that I think it is necessary. I was able to get a pretty good 11Mbps (i.e. plenty good for internet) link where the AP is in the far corner of the basement and I was on the second floor. I think it would take a pretty huge house, or maybe one with concrete/stone/metal floors and walls to need multiple APs.

    9. Re:No really. by ckd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The gray base station has a Lucent PC card inside, so it's using a fairly lame antenna. You can put an external antenna on with a little Dremel work to make a hole in the base station case.

      As for Airport Extreme, the Broadcom PC cards will work under OS X using the Apple driver; you'll wind up with a card sticking out of your TiBook, but you'll get 802.11g and probably better range as well. Worth a try.

      The cheap thing to try (er, free :-) is to pop the battery out of the TiBook and make sure the antenna on that side is pressed firmly into the slot in the case. That may help your range a little bit.

    10. Re:No really. by carn1fex · · Score: 2, Funny

      I vote netgear as the superior AP as i can get an excellent connection on my unsuspecting neighbors network. And I live in a very old apartment building with concrete walls a foot thick and theres a stairwell between me and the closest neighbor:)

      --

      ---------

      No matter how thin you slice it, its still baloney.

    11. Re:No really. by Black+Perl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have an Averatec laptop with built in Wi-fi... I get 100% coverage inside my house, and can even go four or so houses in any direction

      I'm seeing similar results with my new Averatec 3220. It's even better than my D-Link DWL-650+ card, which was previously the best I'd found. Having it on depletes battery life quite a bit faster though.

      Now if I can just get Linux working on the damn Averatec...

      --
      bp
    12. Re:No really. by Creepy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      well, if you're going with Linksys, you may have to use 3rd party firmware to boost the signals (info on third party firmware for Linksys info here). The very common WRT-54G wireless router runs at 19mw and at that power, barely penetrates a hollow 2 foot wooden wall with no insulation (and drops the signal periodically), at least from my personal experience.

      Installing Sveasoft, OpenWRT, or WiFi box firmware allows you to boost the signal to 84mw. I've read to avoid the full 84mw, as it can damage hardware in extended use, but I've also read that this is still in the legal range for the device... even wireless A indoor/outdoor is 250mW. (and I think g is up to 4W).

  2. Re:A snippet by agentforsythe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Then, when they established that record, they turned off their amplifiers and broke the record for an unamplified connection at the same distance."

    does that mean that the connection wasn't actually established unamplified... merely maintained?

  3. Re:A snippet by Alsee · · Score: 4, Informative

    Because they didn't even max out the non-amplified distance. If you read the Slashdot blurb again it says They might have achieved an even greater distance, Justin Rigling said, "but there was no road left."

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  4. Re:A snippet by djcapelis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > Or, if it was established at that distance, why
    > wasn't the amplified distance longer than the non?

    As the article and summary pointed out, they ran out of road.

    And yes, the unamplified distance was merely to maintain the connection and not establish it.

    Either way, impressive.. especially as they would have likely gone farther if they had a good place to go to.

    --
    I touch computers in naughty places
  5. Customers freaking out... by mikael · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, if someone parked outside my building, pointed a six foot dish at my office, and told me my wireless data needed encrypting, I'd probably freak out too.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    1. Re:Customers freaking out... by aardwolf204 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ahem, not to be a spelling nazi, but its

      I'd probably phreak out too.

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
  6. Hawking their equipment? by djcapelis · · Score: 4, Funny

    Am I the only one who find it amusing that these guys roll in on a whim, break the record, win some stuff and immediately go hawk their equipment?

    Some good old hacking spirit right there...

    --
    I touch computers in naughty places
    1. Re:Hawking their equipment? by salm · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not where I am, nor, after a little Google:
      [google] define:hawk

      The verb "hawk" has 3 senses in WordNet.

      1. peddle, monger, huckster, hawk, vend, pitch -- (sell or offer for sale from place to place) ...

      whereas "hock" though I would have given you it, appears to have a different meaning

      The verb "hock" has 2 senses in WordNet.

      1. pawn, soak, hock -- (leave as a guarantee in return for money; "pawn your grandfather's gold watch") ...

      However, this mistake is as nothing to those who type "loose" when they mean "lose".
      http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/lose.html

      --
      no time, no sig
  7. Transfer speed by barcodez · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would be interested to know what kind of transfer speed they got at that distance.

    --

    ----
  8. Help for rural areas? by grunt107 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Althought the article does not mention it, it does not seem like the hardware used to accomplish this was all that advanced.

    If that is the case, their technology could be implemented in limited population density areas, tying back to the somewhat larger urban areas.

    Take for example Iowa. There are many areas over 30 miles from any town larger than 15-30k.
    Surprisingly enough, these 'large' towns have cable/phone (DSL) access.

    So now the remote areas can be wifi attached to the bigger towns/cities and get the faster access (although 11b is not screaming it is better than modem).

    1. Re:Help for rural areas? by jdmetz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      although 11b is not screaming it is better than modem

      Assuming you could actually get 11mbps over that distance, that would be screaming compared to most cable or DSL access. The fastest DSL available in the city of 100k I live in is 6mbps downstream and 1.5mbps upstream.

  9. Re:Metrics is a Milestone away by BorgDrone · · Score: 2, Informative
    Apart from it being in the US where imperial (miles) is the standard.
    Actually, Metric is the standard in the US since President Gerald R. Ford signed the Metric Conversion Act of 1975. However, conversion to metric was/is entirely voluntary (there used to be a 10 year deadline but it got dropped) so no-one actually switched.
  10. Congrats to these kids by vbrookslv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was there in the front row at the awards ceremony at DC12. These kids remind me of myself just a few years ago when I just picked up and moved to Vegas. Wasn't even sure if I had enough money for gas (good thing I was driving a Festiva @~45mpg). I guess this is a good case for those who say that all kids today are slackers.

    For those who do not know, this contest was held in (and around) Vegas, when it was 110+ outside. These guys were dragging equipment up the side of a mountain to get this link. For those who would give these kids sh**, try dragging a 10ft dish(3.048 meters for you metric weenies) several hundred feet up a mountain, and then getting them aligned 55 miles apart, all in 110+f(43c) weather. There was no big 4x4's, they drove dads busted-a** minivan from Ohio for this. Sure, NASA could probably do better, but come'on, this was an amateur thing, and just something cool to do. No big prizes (they won like a couple-hundred bucks in Best Buy gift certs, and some gear).

    If I had a had on, it would be off to these kids for some ingenuity and determination.

    1. Re:Congrats to these kids by Your_Mom · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe it was $1500 in Gift Certs for the three of them. $500 for 3 catagories (Longest unamped, Longest homebrew antenna, Longest overall)

      The also got oodles of wireless goodies.

      --
      Objects in the blog are closer then they ap
    2. Re:Congrats to these kids by Render_Man · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was in the second row, middle block 3rd seat in from speakers left. I probobly have a picture of the back of your head there vbrookslv.

      I was blown away by these guys too. It was most impressive because they had the stuff lying around, made a decision to enter and did it. Despite parents objections they made the trip and got a standing ovation and a heap of well earned praise.

      They did'nt brute force it by just adding more power (they said they were only at about 600mw), they just sat down and did the math to build the dish right. Far more design thought than several people I still see claiming pringles cans are the greatest.

      I just love the fact they also build some targeting equipment and were using linear actuators to align the dishes. Just brilliant. I wish them the best, and a safe drive home.

      --
      Where are we going, and why are we in this hand cart?
  11. Re:A snippet by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They didn't try to do so. My guess is that it's extremely difficult to align the dish with an extremely weak signal. The point of having the boosted signal was probably to help them initially align the dish. While it might be a real pain in the ass to set up such a connection without such assistance, once the dishes are aligned, apparently it's possible to run without amplification.

  12. I'm in Ohio, and Miles are it... by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Miles on the speedometer, miles on the road signs, and 55 mph is a common speed limit, so that 55 mile record means I could drive about an hour away and still get the signal, which in Ohio would be the complete middle of nowhere! Of course, in Ohio it doesn't even matter where you start from, if you drive for exactly one hour in the same direction at 55 mph you will be in the middle of nowhere.

    --
    stuff |
  13. Re:Metrics is a Milestone away by markov_chain · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I grew up in a metric society. I used to think metric units were superior until I lived in the US for a while, and found myself doing plenty of carpentry and DIY stuff where the most common units are inches and feet. I think the subdivision of a foot into 12 inches is fantastic; it allows one to easily divide dimensions into thirds, something that's a PITA in the metric world. In addition, the canonical subdivision of the inch into powers of 2 (1/2, 1/4, 1/8...) is convenient as well.

    Regarding your point about doing without metric, note that virtually all building materials come in imperial sizes. There is no need to know metric units in that environment.

    --
    Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
  14. Tropospheric ducting by Dan+East · · Score: 3, Informative

    When we start talking about setting and breaking distance records using any type of RF, atmospheric conditions will undoubtedly play a factor. A phenomenon known as Tropospheric Ducting can redirect a short wavelength signal back down to earth, allowing further than line of sight communication.

    While this would be great for setting communication record, it would not allow for long-term reliable communication.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  15. Partial sponsor by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the article:
    Wired magazine helped sponsor the contest.

    What's the word? Irony? Misnomer?

    --
    "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
  16. Interesting Guys by HoldenCaulfield · · Score: 4, Informative

    Being a former Cinci resident, I was a bit curious about these guys, and google-stalked them . . .

    Looks like they all went to St. Xavier, a pretty well respected (in both athletics and academics) prep school.

    Here's a picture of Ben when he was a junior, winning a theater award for sound production.

    Meng's got a website here that's a bit outdated, but considering the projects were from his junior year in high school, rather impressive. Seems he was a HAM radio guy.

    Running out of time, the first link I found for Justin Rigling was this link. One more connection to the guy, since I use to work for AK Steel. The little blurb about the scholarship does make him sound like a stereotypical geek (JETS, Science Olympiad, Robotics, Math, and Photography clubs, etc etc). A bit of a contrast to his sister. Not exactly what you'd expect from the son of a steelmaker . . .

    Okay, enough being a stalker . . .

  17. Re:It's a fraud... by ASLRulz · · Score: 4, Informative

    As one of the judges, I can provide the GPS coordinates and you can use your favorite topo maps to determine if it is indeed possible. We will be putting up images and data on the contest page as well as www.adversarialsciencelab.net website sometime today.

  18. Anybody hacking lasers? by WillWare · · Score: 2, Informative
    The only reason to go for wifi distance records is to build an indie Ashcroft-proof internet. It should be possible to route IP packets over inexpensive laser pointers for pretty large distances. I'm not aware that much is being done with this. I found several instances of people doing RS-232 over laser, but very little about IP over laser.
    --
    WWJD for a Klondike Bar?
  19. Ham record is 82 mi by wsanders · · Score: 2, Informative

    From QST magazine (http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2003/12/10/3/):

    "Amateurs complete 82-mile two-way DSSS link on 2.4 GHz: ARRL High Speed Multimedia (HSMM) Working Group member Ken Cuddeback, NT7K, reports that his students at Weber State University in Ogden, Utah, recently completed two-way direct-sequence spread spectrum (DSSS) communication on 2.4 GHz over a distance of 82 miles. The WSU students--which include one ham, Brandon Checketts, KG4NZV, and several prospective licensees--broke the current world record of establishing a wireless link on 2.4 GHz with DSSS (using IEEE 802.11b "Wi-Fi" protocol). "Please join me in congratulating Ken and his students on this fantastic accomplishment!" said ARRL HSMM Working Group Chairman John Champa, K8OCL. Cuddeback says his students used PrimeStar dishes with unamplified Cisco Aironet 350 cards in each laptop. "We set up a NetMeeting session and transferred a 2.5 MB mp3 file successfully," he said. The Cisco Wi-Fi cards run about 100 mW."

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  20. Re:200mW Engenius cards by bscience · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, they were 30mw Lucent Orinoco cards. Impressed yet?

  21. Re:A snippet by ASLRulz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The connection was (re)established unamplified. The team had to shutdown the connection, tilt the antenna down, and climb a latter to remove the amp. Then of course, re-aim the antenna and try again.

  22. Re:Wifi IS GHz by v1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ya I know, a 5/8 groundplane is not a very practical idea in the ghz range, though it's certainly possible. Critical tolerances at that point are well down to the 1mm and below range though, that would not be a fun project to undertake.

    I want to play with http://www.rangeextender.com/224pagransy.html if I get the time someday. 24 DBI gain. I've recommended it to some of our customers, several of whom have bought one, and so far, everybody is quite pleased with them. One of these on one end (and a regular omni on the other end) will blast through building after building to get to the other base station. It's also fully weather-proof and built sturdy, unlike those pringles can jokes.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.