Slashdot Mirror


Technology Review Profiles Miguel de Icaza

prostoalex writes "Technology Review has a feature story on Miguel de Icaza, currently Novell VP of Product Technology, but more known as the leader of Gnome and Mono projects. Miguel is the man Don Box would like to see joining Microsoft for his "amazing amount of raw energy". If you read through the Technology review article, you will see that de Icaza was actually turned down by Microsoft at some point."

19 of 231 comments (clear)

  1. de Icaza is one of THE best coders I've ever met by Real+Troll+Talk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I met Miguel, like, back in '98 at a conference in Mexico. Yes, Linux existed there back then!

    We chatted and I quickly found he was more than just a Rob Malda or Rusty Foster, guys who talk the talk and get all the fame but can't back it up when it comes to lines of code per hour counts.

    Miguel simply AMAZED me with his knowledge and skill. He ever opened up a digital projector and messed with the PROM or jumpers or something and fixed it within 20 minutes, just in time for his talk.

    de Icaza is nothing short of amazing. I DO however question his judgement to kind of jump into the MS camp with MONO/.NET emulation, but I know that since he's smarter than me he must be doing the right thing.

    --

    If you liked my post,
  2. hrm... by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 4, Insightful

    i seem to recall a Slashdot sig or two quoting Miguel saying that he was a MS clipy fan.

    Many a /.'er would burn at the stake a man who had said so, but think for a sec before torching up those flames, kids.

    Clippy might have sucked and annoyed many of you, but think about those moments when grammy was looking about for a movie of the grandkids.

    i know, i know...stretch, strech, but ponder for me your grand parents for a sec: what do they read/write/view email with? Yeah, l33tz as you may be, gramps needs some some help from time to time: Gnome does that. Period.

    Gripe and bitch on the 'spatial this' and 'spatial that' ...your world is *not* ruined by this man: change your config....ye that bitch and moan how easy it is to twiddle this and that in /etc/here or /etc/there. Yeah, i'm good with that, but gramps is not - what can he use? Gnome. Or Kde.

    Save the zealotous mass, either is good, but Clippy has helped many a folk get "email"...your ub3r ass needs to realize these are not the folks that care for or about your sendmail/qmail/rfc gripes....they want the pics of the little grandkids.

    Rip on Miguel as you like, but recall, this is a man that wants the linux desktop to prosper, regardless of what fanboy, ub3r wannabies latch on.

    Let the quote go....listen to the spirit...you do want me to listen to the open source spirit don't you?

    1. Re:hrm... by Erwos · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think the most interesting part of the article was near the beginning, where it described him as being both idealistic and pragmatic. That's exactly the kind of person we need promoting Free software.

      RMS was both at the start of his career - and, interestingly, he started fading out when he seemed to have lost the pragmatism (GNU/Linux, Hurd, etc.). Hopefully Miguel will avoid making a similar mistake.

      To me, at least, it seems like he's got the world's best job: get paid to produce Free software. Not a bad gig.

      -Erwos

      --
      Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
    2. Re:hrm... by Teckla · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Rip on Miguel as you like, but recall, this is a man that wants the linux desktop to prosper, regardless of what fanboy, ub3r wannabies latch on.

      I have no desire to rip on Miguel; however, I think Miguel may have underestimated Microsoft.

      My opinion is that .NET is a trojan horse: The "best" and "most up-to-date" implementation will always be on Windows, which will give Microsoft a great deal of marketing strength, even if Mono can run a large number of .NET applications (which seems a long ways off: Windows.Forms isn't "standardized" by ECMA, and it's very Windows-centric. Mono needs Windows.Forms in order to run GUI-based .NET applications).

      And if the Linux/Mono combo ever becomes a serious threat, Microsoft can just beat Mono into submission with a fist full of patents.

      Even though Java is proprietary, Sun has bent over backwards for years to get the community involved and keep the community involved. The ubiquity, robustness, and maturity of the Java Virtual Machine makes Java ready right now for what Mono may be ready for some day.

      Don't be paranoid, but at the same time, don't dismiss Microsoft's pattern of abusive behavior over the years. Before you commit to Mono, think through all the alternatives first, and be sure you're not opening the city gates for a trojan horse.

    3. Re:hrm... by miguel · · Score: 5, Informative
      That is why Mono implements two stacks:

      http://primates.ximian.com/~miguel/tmp/two-stack s. png

      One is the Microsoft compatible one.

      The other one is where we are pouring our energies:
      An ECMA core with the following on top:

      • Gtk# to build GUI applications.
      • Simias: to write collaborative applications.
      • iFolder: to synchronize your file system and integrate into your high-end applications.
      • Beagle: a platform to provide searching and contextual information at any moment.
      • Novell.Ldap: Focus on open standards for directory services.
      • Mono.Data.*: The API to access open source databases.
      • RelaxNG: Microsoft likes XmlSchema, it is older, but RelaxNG is cleaner and simpler, and we have a stack to use it.
      • IKVM: We integrated natively with Java.
      • IronPython: we can run your Python code.
      • Cairo bindings: to provider advanced rendering.
      • Tao: OpenGL/SDL APIs for your applications.
      • Gconf#/Dbus#: APIs to access the configuration and bus systems on modern desktops.
      • Gecko# to integrate Mozilla into your apps.


      There are quite a few of other open source stacks
      for the ECMA CLI today that range from research
      to practically useful.

      Miguel.
    4. Re:hrm... by miguel · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, today we do not have Windows.Forms implemented
      (I should update that graph with the latest version
      where we point that out).

      Windows.Forms will be available in a few months.

    5. Re:hrm... by back_pages · · Score: 4, Funny
      If I was Miguel, I wouldn't spend too much on a dress.

      Words of wisdom for very nearly everyone named Miguel.

    6. Re:hrm... by acebone · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What an odd coincidence - we seem to be using our computers at the same time, imagine that amongst slashdot readers :)

      I am a total vendorlockin-phobe, I do "small-time" webapplications - and people come to me with their .ASP thingies, and they're always terribly written (always VBScript btw.) - I do my best to sway my customers into using PHP solutions, because that way I know the code I do for them will work on a variety of OSes and Webservers.

      I really shudder at the mere thought of .NET, because no matter how elegant C# may be, and no matter how elegant the layers beneath the language may be - it's right now a surefire path to vendor-lockin.

      As long as MONO is still infant (or is it adolescent by now ?) .NET is out of the question for me, and I'd rather drive a cab (I kid you not - I am getting the license right now) than do MS/Oracle/RandomBigCorp/etc... only solutions. It simply is no fun to know that I in part work to help a big vendor maintain it's grip on computing.

      There is a lot of speculations around about whether MONO is playing a realistic game. Will M$ just strangle MONO if you get too close etc... and I have very little knowledge to help me judge on that.

      Is there any where I can read the MONO viewpoint on this issue. I would love to see a FAQ type document addressing these concerns.

      For instance: I know not enough to understand the implications of the ECMA thingie, but I can't help thinking that Javascript has an ECMA spec (ECMA script I believe) and that MS does not adhere to it fully.

      Does the MONO community believe that MS will stick to the .NET ECMA spec, and if so what makes you believe that ?

      So in short:
      Did the MONO community consider 'worst-case-MS-behaviour' and the following worst-case-scenarios ? And if you did, is there some where I can read about that ?

      --
      Check out my PHP Url Validator
  3. Miguel's great, but... by mechsoph · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd like to thank Miguel for his contributions. I'm a gnome user, and it is quite nice. What I don't get though, is why he seems absolutely fascinated with the boys in redmond. He reimplements Outlook, and now he's reimplimenting their reimplimentation of Java. Why not get behind an OSS implementation of the original ala kaffe or gcj, or push the OSS own Parrot?

    1. Re:Miguel's great, but... by Erwos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "now he's reimplimenting their reimplimentation of Java"

      You know, it's not like FOSS programmers just allot time to whatever the masses care about. They program to scratch their itches - and Java is obviously not Miguel's itch.

      Don't view Mono as time taken away from kaffe/gcj/Parrot, because chances are, the time put into Mono wouldn't have gone into any of those.

      -Erwos

      --
      Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
  4. Re:You can't be both. by JanneM · · Score: 4, Informative

    [...] de Icaza took the interview as an opportunity to lecture managers on why Microsoft should abandon its multibillion-dollar business model and embrace open-source programming. Not surprisingly, de Icaza wasn't hired.

    The blurb here makes it sound like he was begging on his knees for them to take him on. Not quite what the article describes. He's not the least "confused on what side he's on".

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  5. Re:de Icaza is one of THE best coders I've ever me by jacoplane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These are baseless accusations. I would suggest you keep the conspiracy theories to yourself unless you have some evidence to back them up.

    Maybe you are actually someone hired by Microsoft to spread FUD on slashdot!

    Miguel's a leader of the community who deserves our respect. I think it's become clear over the years he could have made as much money as he wanted but chose to do what he felt was right.

  6. Why he is important by babasyzygy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A lot of people denigrate Miguel as being a "Microsoft fan."

    That's not fair. What he is, is a realist. The fact is that as long as Microsoft has a vast majority of the desktops out there, any competing system has a choice: between creating their own 31337 world where only the initiated may play, or instead creating systems that work and play well with others. By paying close attention to what system and paradigms users are used to - that is to say, that Microsoft ships - Miguel helps furhter the rapid adoption of Linux as a viable Windows alternative.

    Why he is imporant is not just that he realizes this, but that he does something about it. Real hackers write code for their beliefs, as he does.

  7. Whats better about Java? by brunes69 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why do so many people around here seem to think that Java is more free than .Net? This is far from true.

    Java is just as patent-encumbered as .Net is. Hell, Sun sued *Microsoft* over some Java patents shortly ago. Who is to say they wouldn't do the same to gcj if it served their interests?

    In fact, it is argueable that it is moreso since a single, commercial body controls it (Sub) whereas with .Net at least you have a standards body (ECMA) who has ratified the spec, which means that an independant implementation of the spec API (Mono) is less likely to have problems than an independant implimentation of the Java API.

    The reality is that everyone is against .Net soley because it is made by MS. Yay for groupthink!.

    1. Re:Whats better about Java? by abulafia · · Score: 4, Insightful
      First, let me say that I hate Java, with a passion, as a language. The bugs, behavioural oddity, and general shoddy crap one has to put up with in a "modern" language that is supposed to have support for all the neat new bells and whistles appalls me. Also, I'll say I like Perl. There, that should have cut down on most of the readership...

      Java is just as patent-encumbered as .Net is. Hell, Sun sued *Microsoft* over some Java patents shortly ago. Who is to say they wouldn't do the same to gcj if it served their interests?

      You have a nice bundle of assumptions there, but when picked apart, they don't hold.

      • patents. Yes, I believe Sun owns some, and Microsoft also owns some. A significant difference is that (a) Sun has a history of promoting open standards whereas Microsoft has a history of abusing them, and (b) Sun has no stated plan to extract growth via patents, whereas Microsoft does, and is clearly actively persuing those plans. Any large company that didn't hold a portfolio would not exist as a large company, and any company that wants to do something like Java would do well to defend it. Acting shocked that Sun is protecting a 10 year development and branding effort is either naive or disingenuous.
      • Sun sued Microsoft over a contract dispute, not a patent dispute. I know many slashot denizens are not aware of the difference, but there is one, much like the difference between cows and rats - they're both mammals as opposed to reptiles (legal disputes vs. cameros and baseball bats), but you woudn't want to milk the wrong one. I'll be generous and assume you don't know the difference.
      • Raising the spectre of the fact that someone with a history of open sharing might someday sue someone else as a defense of a monopolist who is going on an intellectual property hording rampage puts you in company with such staunch innovationists as Jack "VCRs are the Boston Stranger" Valenti. Is that really a point you'd like to push on with?
      Attempting to dress dot-net up as something that will be a vibrant, open platform (one that thrives with or without Microsoft) is silly. Everyone knows it isn't. If sun dies tomorrow, Java will live on -- just look at it. I hope that Miguel knows what he is doing, and if he doesn't, fails to distract too many people. Java has warts, plenty of them. It works for many people, and the fact that dot-net is such a big talking-point is a great confirmation of this fact- why would MSFT bother if they had the market sewn up like they do with IE?

      Just an addendum...

      For my part, I do Java when I have to, and Perl the rest of the time. (C for interfacing with DBs, modifying code, whatever.) Perl's absolutely the best kept secret of development. I have Perl running in a couple top-100 sites. and many more instances elsewhere. Ask Amazon (I mention them because I've never done any work for them, and they use Perl -- HTML::Mason, actually). Desktop Perl is getting traction, too, lately... I built a Windows installer for a Perl desktop app the other day that, so far, the client is thrilled with. I expect this to be cheap growth for my company. So, from my perspective, please - keep writing PHP and VB. Please make my consulting gigs that much easier to land! The gaggles of people who hate Perl are my company's best competitve advantage.

      --
      I forget what 8 was for.
  8. Re:Miguel has told you why by miguel · · Score: 4, Informative

    Some languages map very nicely to the JVM or the CLR
    (the same developer that did Jython now has
    a very fast implementation called IronPython that
    was unveiled and demostrated at OSCON).

    The problem is with languages that require pointers:
    Fortran, C, C++ and some extra support is convenient
    for some functional languages that the CLR
    provides.

    I mean, nothing really ground breaking, but the
    CLR had a chance to learn from Java's limitations.

    The new MS C++ compiler generates pure CIL executables
    when using the /clr flag which is a very convenient
    way of integrating existing C/C++ codebases with
    managed codebases.

    Miguel.

  9. Wrong tactic? by shadowmatter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microsoft software architect Don Box even wrote a song imploring de Icaza to join the company and sang it to him in front of a large audience at a party late last year.

    Maybe they should have just used a stunt by Steve Ballmer instead?

    Steve (onstage): "Miguel, you're a great developer... DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS!"

    - sm

  10. Re:Novell. Energy. by JanneM · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For me it is difficult to put my finger on exactly what has hampered Java's uptake in the general open source community.

    It's unlikely to be only one reason. These issues are big, complex with many aspects, and every developer that has made a choice in this field probably have their own unique blend of reasons.

    For me, it has come down to a few things, but these hase tended to change as well.

    I started playing with Java looong ago, like 1995ish, and actually wrote a small app as part of a summer job (which didn't really go anywhere). It was pretty horrible at the time. A big problem was that we were doing client-side apps, with an UI, and with Java and its UI libs, our then modern machines ended up with the performance of a CBM64, but with far uglier user interface. I still have dreams about that experience after a night with too much beer and rich food.

    Today, the performance is better. Using Swing (is it? I mix them up), it tends to look better as well. But: any UI is still uncoupled from the rest of my desktop. I have my nice AA fonts everywhere - except in a Java app, which uses its own font settings and no AA. Controls, cutting and pasting and so on also reinforces that the app is just a free-floating guest on my machine and is not integrated one bit. Also, the runtime takes a _lot_ of resources - on disk and in memory. There sould be no need for that, really - all other VM:s I have (mono, perl, python) seem far less resource hungry.

    Oh, and the install is also "too good" for my machine, and plonks down itself in its own private directory, not deigning to play nice with the rest of the machine. If all my other apps can have common resources in /usr/share, libraries in /usr/lib and so on, why can't Java?

    OK, this sounds like a litany. It's not that bad, but you wanted to know why people aren't enamoured with Java the way they seem to become about mono, and this is my personal (partial) answer. In short, I write a GTK# app in mono, and it feels like a natural part of my desktop. I write it in Java, and it feels like an intruder.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  11. Re:de Icaza is one of THE best coders I've ever me by anothy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OMG.

    i'm picking on you because you exemplify superbly what's true of most of this thread, and half the posts on this story: intense fanboyism. you deduced that he was a great coder from a short conversation? what'd he do, spend the whole time reciting the Mono headers? great coder, lousy conversationalist. you can't figure out how good a coder someone is without looking at their code ! and we'll ignore for the moment this flatly stupid idea that LoC/hr is some measure of a coder's skill. all the "he's nothing short of amazing" stuff just doesn't "take" without some rationale behind it, all of which is totally missing from most of the fanboy posts. "he's smarter than me, he must know what he's doing" is triangulated somewhere between funny, stupid, and dangerous. reserve judgment for people with a proven track record, but even Ken and Dennis make mistakes.

    and, speaking of track records, anyone know what the current score is for people or organizations that try to "play nice" with our "friends" in Redmond? (hint: it ain't pretty)

    i'm amazed by both the number of "he's the only one that gets it" (c'mon, the only one? there's an awful lot of bright people out there) and "he just doesn't get it" posts. people on both sides seem really animated. i've never met the guy, but most people i know who have ended up kinda violently opposed to him. what is it about the guy that inspires such strong emotion? is it just the fact that he's working on topics that touch on sensitive areas for many FS/OS folks (MS, and playing nice with them)? or is de Icaza the new RMS (people seem to have mostly mellowed about him)?

    i've got mod points, and i was gonna try to even this thread out some, but i couldn't figure out where the -1 Fanboy rating was.

    --

    i speak for myself and those who like what i say.