Slashdot Mirror


Licensing Computer Techs As TV Repairmen

An anonymous reader writes "According to a story in yesterday's New Orleans paper, the Louisiana Radio and Television Technicians Board has sent letters to computer techs demanding fees to license them as radio and TV repairmen. Apparently, as computers drive more home theater applications, the board is trying to classify them as 'playback and recording device equipment,' which the law gives the board power to regulate. It looks more like a money grab, though, since no test is required, just $55 and an affidavit." It seems to me the better question is not whether computers can be defined in many circumstances as playback and recording equipment (hard to get around), but whether this kind of forced classification makes sense in the first place. Disingenuous quote of the day: "We're not trying to swing our arm around a whole bunch of people to get new revenue."

81 of 408 comments (clear)

  1. End of the letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Y'all send in them checks, ya hear?

    Yours Truly,
    The Fatty McTax.

  2. In Home Service? by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny
    How will paranoids get in home service?

    "Awright, it's out there on the grass, yew juss fixit and then back away from it, slow like."

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  3. Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Computer techs hit with fee for license
    But it's coming from radio, TV industry
    Wednesday, August 04, 2004
    By Stewart Yerton
    Business writer

    For the past five years, Jarrod Broussard has run a small computer consulting company, helping business and residential customers deal with a host of problems: from designing Web sites and hosting them, to setting up networks, to troubleshooting software problems and eliminating the viruses that often plague today's computers.

    To Broussard, such work made him a computer technician, plain and simple. But according to a notice sent to Broussard last week from the Louisiana Radio and Television Technicians Board, state regulators have a different view of Broussard and others like him.
    Advertisement

    According to a letter from the regulators, Broussard actually falls under the same regulatory umbrella as a TV repairman.

    As home computers come to the fore as entertainment devices, powering home theaters, audio systems and the like, the Radio and Television Technicians Board is seeking to license computer technicians much the way it has licensed television and radio repair workers since the 1950s.

    To that end, the board last week informed Broussard that he would have to send the board $55 and an affidavit from an employer, customer or computer school attesting that he was a computer consultant. In exchange, Broussard would receive his license.

    Mark Lewis, president of the Louisiana Technology Council, a trade association based in New Orleans, said he finds the situation absurd.

    "They're taking a law passed when computers weren't even around and applying it to computers," Lewis said. "The whole thing is mind-boggling to me -- how they could come up with something like this?"

    According to the letter sent to Broussard, the rationale is straightforward. Louisiana consumer protection laws give the board the power to license people who repair televisions, radios and "playback and recording device equipment" used in the home, the letter said. "Many home computers today, provide for television reception and recording, and all provide audio/visual playback and recording capabilities," the letter continued.

    "Therefore," the letter said, "the Board has elected to license computer technicians."

    The requirement would apply to people "engaged in the repair, maintenance, consultation, or training of computer equipment, including hardware, peripherals, and networks used in the home," the letter said. Commercial computer technicians are not subject to the new requirement, although individuals who provide both commercial and residential services have to comply.

    Computer technicians already in the business would be grandfathered into the system and not required to take a test proving competency to obtain a license, the letter said. Payment of $55 to the board and the affidavit would be sufficient.

    Stanley Brohn, secretary of the Radio and Television Technicians Board, said the intent and scope of the licensing requirement has been misunderstood. The licensing requirement, Brohn said, is designed to protect consumers who have hired computer technicians to install or repair new entertainment systems that employ computers.

    For example, Brohn said, some high definition television monitors are designed to be driven by computers, and in such instances, the work should be done by a certified television and radio technician to ensure that the expensive equipment is not damaged, Brohn said.

    "We're not going after computer technicians," he said. "The only thing we're doing is giving an opportunity for computer technicians to get into the radio and television side of the business."

    Brohn said the letter sent to Broussard and others was misleading in stating that the license requirement would apply to a broad range of computer technicians and consultants, and not simply those wanting to set up home entertainment systems.

    Brohn confirmed that he signed the letter but said

  4. In other news . . . by dgrgich · · Score: 4, Funny

    Louisiana is also attempting to force lawyers to license themselves as garbage collectors. Surprisingly, the Louisiana Bar Association, when asked for comment, indicated that they agreed with the decision.

    1. Re:In other news . . . by serutan · · Score: 5, Funny

      In other news: "Louisiana state government needs more money, thinks up new way to get it."

      I can visualize the meeting. "Hey, there's lots of people fixin' computers in Looziana and we aint making a dime off'em. Say we charge $55 a pop. I'll get started mailing out the threat letters!"

    2. Re:In other news . . . by new+account+for+mod · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can visualize the meeting. "Hey, there's lots of people fixin' computers in Looziana and we aint making a dime off'em. Say we charge $55 a pop. I'll get started mailing out the threat letters!"

      Darl McBride's first decision at his new job as a consultant for the Louisiana Radio and Television Technicians Board?

  5. I can't fix most TVs by Lord+Kano · · Score: 5, Interesting

    and most TV repairmen can't fix computers.

    It's obviously a way to try to grap money.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I would imagine that TV repairmen were originally regulated because they had to know how to safely work on open TV cabinets containing dangerous high voltages, operate test equipment on those high voltage circuits, and install suitable replacement parts that wouldn't catch on fire.

      I doubt that most computer repair techs have ever opened a monitor (or even a power supply). The entire thing is treated as a disposable unit. Most servicable computer components are relatively idiot-proof, only fit into the appropriate sockets, and operate at no more than 12V.

      If they weren't just going for a money grab, they'd exempt all computer techs who don't open up monitors or power supplies.

    2. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Entropius · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Which is all of them.

      I've been fixing computers for people for a long while, and have never had to open a CRT or power supply. They're just not the sorts of things that break, especially since 90% of repair requests involve cleaning up after Microsoft and are software-only.

    3. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Lord+Kano · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Which is all of them.

      I disagree.

      I've been fixing computers for people for a long while, and have never had to open a CRT or power supply. They're just not the sorts of things that break, especially since 90% of repair requests involve cleaning up after Microsoft and are software-only.

      I don't know about the work you do, but I've had to open a few monitors. Especially when I was doing repair work for Apple. I couldn't tell you how many analog/power boards I replaced in Summer 2000 iMacs. I have a Gateway monitor on my desk right now that was declared junk. I opened it up, fixed it and have been using it for nearly 5 years. Not a bad lifespan for a free piece of hardware.

      I open every dead power supply that I come across to grab the fans. You never know when a 12V fan will come in handy.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    4. Re:I can't fix most TVs by pla · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I would imagine that TV repairmen were originally regulated because they had to know how to safely work on open TV cabinets containing dangerous high voltages, operate test equipment on those high voltage circuits, and install suitable replacement parts that wouldn't catch on fire.

      I worry about this particular money grab for exactly that reason...

      Everyone so far has complained that PC techs have very little in common with TV repairmen, and should not need licensure under the same rules.

      I would point out the flip side to that - Under this wonderful scheme, Lousiana would suddenly have a lot of "licensed" TV repairmen who had no clue how to safely (or successfully, for that matter) repair an actual TV.

      My suggestion for all the geeks annoyed by getting such a letter? Send in your $55, add "TV Repair" to your shingle, and assuming you survive your first electrocution, sue the hell out of the state for making you think you had the skills needed to safely do that job... "Well, they said I could, and in fact, they even said I had to!"

    5. Re:I can't fix most TVs by dmaxwell · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apple is phasing out CRTs so this won't be true much longer but Apple Certified Technicians are indeed expected to be able to service Apple monitors. The Desktop Certification course contains a high voltage safety portion that has to be passed to get the certification.

      For that matter, LCD panels have inverters in them that can give quite a nasty shock. Apple also expects techs to be able to change out inverters and the lcd itself. Even if you're not working on Apples, it isn't uncommon to have to turn down the flyback voltage and refocus CRTs. I'm certainly not going to throw out a CRT that is slightly out of focus.

      As for power supplies, I've had supplies where the only thing wrong with it was that the fan had bad bearings. Swapping fans out with a more seriously damaged supply is nice quick repair.

    6. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Lehk228 · · Score: 4, Funny

      would you care to elaborate on what type of "improper" wiring will cause a CRT to emit X-rays

      *scribbles notes furiously*
      *looks for old CRT*

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    7. Re:I can't fix most TVs by xiando · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As another comment said, get that lisence if you actually do open up CRT monitors and power supplies.

      I do fix other peoples computers from time to time. Home computers. I never opened a CRT monitor. Because I do not know "electronics", I know computers. If the PSU breaks, I get a new PSU. The PC is "repaired", the PSU is broken.

      So I don't get why you would need a paper saying you can do "high volate" (I belive that's why "not just anyone" was supposed to open av TV 50 years ago..). I don't. I do computers. If repairing PSUs is your thing, then do get that lisence. But wait, a PSU doesn't do playback and ANYONE can repair that, apparently, fixing a computer by replaceing a broken PSU, a square box you, as already stressed, DON'T open.. lol

    8. Re:I can't fix most TVs by randyest · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not having been anywhere the odious "source" of the grandparent poster's claim (thankfully,) I can only provide a cite to the contrary

      CRT's (Cathode Ray Tubes) direct a beam of electrons at a thin layer of phosphor which coats the screen on your monitor. When the electrons strike the phosphor, shadow mask and other screen components, x-rays are produced. The amount and energy of the x-rays depends on the accelerating voltage. The relatively low voltages in CRT's (compared to commercial x-ray machines) means that relatively low quantities of low energy x-rays are produced and modern monitors are so well shielded, that there is no concern of being irradiated over time. Though it is possible for a damaged monitor to emit x-ray radiation, it is unlikely that harmful amounts will be released, and most x-rays would be directed towards the back or sides of the monitor. Any damage to the front of the CRT severe enough to increase x-ray emission would cause the CRT to implode.

      Ya know, if you're smart enough to ignore this sort of stuff (or vain enough to try to correct them,) /. can be hilarious for the amazing level of confidence maintained by some while posting the most outrageous, usually unsupported, and sometimes unsupportable nonsense ever uttered.

      --
      everything in moderation
    9. Re:I can't fix most TVs by DarkOx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, let me tell you that a real computer repair shop will have a service depot with people who do work at the electronics level. I work in my companies IT department but sometimes I help the service guys when they are under the gun with a back log. I know only enough electronics to be helpful with basic stuff like testing caps and de-soldering and replacing identical parts based on a sheet of most common failuers until something works. Some of those guys are really smart though and know their stuff. Its incrdible some of the stuff I would have labeled as lost causes that they can have fixed in no-time flat. There service everything from IBM Iserise equipment doing fine detail work on tape drives all the way down to label printers, which most often you just hit with something.

      The point of my comment is this though. The people doing that work for us are EEs, they have credited degrees in Electrical Engineering and many are licensed as EEs. Considering the people who are doing this kinda repair work are already well licensed and covered. It seems insulting to license them again as "repair men"/.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    10. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Macgrrl · · Score: 3, Informative

      When I used to work as an Apple Tech, is was rated to repair monitors (CRTs) and did.

      Power fluctuations could cause the analog baords or the power supply boards on the CRT assembly to fail - usually if a capacitor overloaded. The Performa/PM 5200 model in particular was prone to these problems. In addition to replacing the faulty components, you would then have to 'configure' the display, aligning the image, keystone, etc...

      Given most newer style digital displays allow you to play with the alignment controls through a control panel on the front of the device, you spend less time with the back off - but it wasn't always that way.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    11. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Lord+Kano · · Score: 4, Informative

      would you care to elaborate on what type of "improper" wiring will cause a CRT to emit X-rays

      Just because YOU never heard of it, doesn't mean that it's not true.

      Have a look at this.

      When the electrons strike the phosphor, shadow mask and other screen components, x-rays are produced. The amount and energy of the x-rays depends on the accelerating voltage. The relatively low voltages in CRT's (compared to commercial x-ray machines) means that relatively low quantities of low energy x-rays are produced and modern monitors are so well shielded, that there is no concern of being irradiated over time.

      This only applies when things are operating to spec, if some inept repairman steps up the accelerating voltage you will be exposed to X-Rays.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    12. Re:I can't fix most TVs by randyest · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please tell me how to "step up" the accelerating voltage in a CRT without installing a new transformer or a bank of capacitors. You speak of this "stepping up" as if one might do it accidentally.

      One wouldn't.

      --
      everything in moderation
    13. Re:I can't fix most TVs by DrCash · · Score: 2, Funny
      especially since 90% of repair requests involve cleaning up after Microsoft and are software-only.

      Perhaps computer technicians should join the janitors' union, instead of TV repairmen!

      :-)

    14. Re:I can't fix most TVs by lonesome+phreak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I hear you on the fans. I've also fixed many a noisy, soon-to-be-dead power supply by just oiling the fan. I use the fans in all sorts of other projects too. Recently I installed a five-inch 12v fan out of a dead Dell Poweredge to increase my room's AC flow. It's about 15 degrees cooler now than it was, and it's been 108 outside.

      --
      Maybe we DID take the blue pill. You wouldn't remember anyway.
    15. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you increase a tv tube's anode past its specification (like 35,000 volts, when it requires 25,000 volts) it will emit xray's.

    16. Re:I can't fix most TVs by ZhuLien · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do you think we can apply for a TV repairman licence even though we live in Australia? Sounds like a good deal if you ask me!

    17. Re:I can't fix most TVs by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Funny

      Even the old ones did. It's all a matter of how LONG it takes to discharge. ;)

      Convincing someone to lick the caps causes them to discharge VERY quickly and most spectacularly.*

      [*] Very bad idea. Do not try this at home. May be harmful or fatal. If you do this and die, the world will be better off. Poster disclaims all liability for your own stupidity.

  6. Already required in CA by BrynM · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Technically, in California you have to be a licensed appliance and electronics repair person already. It's just not enforced (that wouldn't go over well in San Jose). I wish I had time to find a better link to source, but here's a link.

    --
    US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    1. Re:Already required in CA by BrianH · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually it is enforced, just not uniformly. I run a small consulting firm on the side doing low lost technology assistance for home based businesses (mostly custom software, but I do a bit of HW as well), and I've had my BEAR license for a while. Apparently I stole a contract from someone with a license, they turned me in, and I received a warning letter from the state advising me that I faced fines and prosecution for operating an electronics repair business without the proper permits.

      Today I pay $165 a year to the great state of California for the "right" to fix peoples computers. One advantage though...I get to charge more! When somebody points out that company X is cheaper, I get to say "Are you sure they're a properly licensed facility?" The answer is invariably no, which often lands me the job ;-)

      --

      There is nothing so pathetic as seeing a beautiful young theory roughed up by a tough gang of facts.
  7. What about car mechanics? by bravehamster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since the radio is just a component of the car, the car as a whole could be considered a playback device. Are they sending this extortion attempt to car mechanics? No? Funny that...

    --
    ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    1. Re:What about car mechanics? by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 2, Funny
      Are they sending this extortion attempt to car mechanics? No? Funny that...

      You've got a person who spends all day at a keyboard, versus a person who's adept at wielding a tire iron and can use a pneumatic wrench to remove all your (car's) nuts in five seconds flat. Now...which one would you chose as an extortion target? :-)

      --
      A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
  8. A+ for TV repair by ShineyMcShine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It works both ways, A+ for the TV guy and TV license for computer tech.

  9. Oh cool by huber · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nothing against tv repair men, it is a very technical skill in many respects, but i didnt pay $28,000 for 4 years of school to be registered as a tv repair man.

  10. Looks like a money grab to me by ElForesto · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It follows a disturbing pattern of "licensing for no purpose" that has been firmly established as standard operating procedure in this country for decades. We license driving, marriage, fishing, hunting, and now WORKING? What's next? An oxygen license? I hope plenty of IT workers stand up and say "hell no" in a massive act of civil disobedience. For that matter, let the TV and radio guys do it too!

    --
    There is a difference between "insightful" and "inciteful" other than spelling.
    1. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Informative

      They all have a purpose...

      Driving -- for the safety of the road. Those drivers who prove themselves unsafe are removed.
      Marriage -- the license isn't as much a permission as a document proving it happened on the public record.
      Fishing/hunting -- to count limit the number of people who do so. If requests outnumber the number of animals that are meant to be taken, they won't approve them all and/or stop issuing.

    2. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What's next? An oxygen license?


      Actually, you already need an oxygen license. Oxygen is actually a drug and to administer it to someone else, you need to have EMT or dotor/nurse training. Of course, there's nothing stopping you going to Linde gas and buying 50L of compressed O2 yourself, but if you give it to someone else and they die, you can be held responsable.

      DAN (Divers Alert Network) offer a course on how to provide oxygen for scuba diving injures involving DCS. At the end of it you recieve a 'license' that says you know how to provide o2. Thing is, part of the course is the memorisation of a phrase along the lines of: "It has been demonstrated that oxygen could improve your condition. I am not offering this oxygen to you, but the regulator is working and I am leaving it here next to you".


      I know, I know, you probably meant air (21% o2, 79% n2) when you said o2 above..

  11. I dunno... by Srass · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd think there'd be a big difference between someone licensed to repair computers, and someone who repaired computers who was licensed to repair television sets.

    1. Re:I dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think both groups of people are aware that it's a bad idea to use a screwdriver to short a capacitor the size of your fist.

      That's the main point of TV repair licensing.

  12. Re:I don't see it as such a bad thing. by cipher+uk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    you are overlooking the fact you won't standout when it reaches a critical mass. as its $55 everyone will get one as without one you will standout badly. this is when it just becomes a money grabbing scheme

  13. Whats next? by DBA_01123 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Whats next automechanics having to get licenses as ferriers to change tires?

    1. Re:Whats next? by Six+Nines · · Score: 2, Informative

      that's "farrier" -- it means "one who shoes horses" -- not that spelling is considered a skill, or anything...

    2. Re:Whats next? by B747SP · · Score: 3, Funny
      not that spelling is considered a skill, or anything.

      What's next, a license to spell?

      --
      I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  14. Don't license by pholower · · Score: 4, Insightful
    In the end, Brohn acknowledged, the licensing system as it is now envisioned will not fulfill its stated purpose of ensuring consumers that a licensed worker will have the skills that Brohn said are needed to set up the new computer-based media systems. By requiring little more than a fee and a letter from a boss or client, Brohn admitted, the board is doing little to control the quality of licensees.

    "That is the problem with a grandfather clause," he said. "There is nothing that we can do about that."

    Sure there is, don't license computer technicians!

    --
    -- johntracy.com, because everybody else is wrong.
  15. Re:I don't see it as such a bad thing. by cmallinson · · Score: 5, Funny
    For $55, you get to say that you are a licensed computer repairperson.
    It would make one stand out amongst competition.
    That seems like a good deal to me.

    In that case, send me $75, and you can be a preferred licenced computer repairperson

  16. Louisiana = Alabama by Zaranne · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is same sort of stupid stuff that Alabama pulls. They charge a licensing fee to sell calculators in the state. This is from a law made in the 1800's when cash registers were introduced. I think politicians thought "if it takes money, we should get some of it." They threw "them thar' cal-u-lating machines" in since they can be used to calculate money.

    --
    So when is the Hawkeye movie coming out?
    1. Re:Louisiana = Alabama by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 2, Informative

      What do you expect from a state that bans dildos?

  17. isn't that against the law? by Vandil+X · · Score: 4, Insightful

    According the the RIAA, MPAA, the NFL, and several other entertainment groups, playing broadcasted or distributed entertainment on a computer is against the law....

    ...So how can a local government body issue people a license to repair lawbreaking equipment?

    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
    1. Re:isn't that against the law? by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 4, Informative
      So how can a local government body issue people a license to repair lawbreaking equipment?

      Same way they can demand you pay a tax on all the marijuana you (not you personally) sell. You can actually buy marijuana tax stamps, which you are required to place on all bags of the stuff.

      Weird. "Put these stamps on all the bags of the stuff we'll send you to jail for if we catch you."

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    2. Re:isn't that against the law? by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The IRS can require you to report all income, including from your drug deals, stolen property you fence, and income from illegal gambling...

      and penalize you for failure to do so..

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  18. Re:I don't see it as such a bad thing. by geek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "It would make one stand out amongst competition."

    No it wouldn't because all the competition will also have to have paid $55. It does nothing but gouge people for $55.

  19. Maybe they aren't crooked scum by RealAlaskan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    From the fine article:
    Brohn [ Stanley Brohn, secretary of the Radio and Television Technicians Board...] said the letter sent to Broussard and others was misleading in stating that the license requirement would apply to a broad range of computer technicians and consultants, and not simply those wanting to set up home entertainment systems.
    So, just maybe, they are simply trying (clumsily, but legitimately) to enforce an existing law as it was intended to be used. If they tell computer techs who aren't trying to specialize in home theater systems that they aren't subject to the tax, we'll know that the government there is honest. Or is that an oxymoron?

    Of course, the idea of licensing TV repairmen is neither more nor less insane than the idea of calling computer repairmen TV repairmen. All it accomplishes is to restrict the supply and drive up the prices, hurting the very public it was ``supposed to protect''.

  20. sign me up! by to_kallon · · Score: 3, Funny

    i think it's a great idea, given proper expansion. for instance, i'd be willing to pay $100 if i could call myself a doctor and get paid like one. or for $75 you could call yourself a pilot and get to fly around. of course, becoming a lawyer would be free, just as encouragement.

    --


    The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it.
    -Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:sign me up! by rewt66 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Problem is, paying $75 to call yourself a pilot may let you fly around, but it doesn't mean you can land...

  21. Stop complaining! by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Go run for office and fix it already!

    Anyway, I *like* that there is a driving license. I wish it were *more* difficult.

    Marriage... that one is less useful now than it might have been 100 years ago. And with common law marriages, quite useless, though lots of states don't recognize common law marriage.

    Fishing and hunting I'll agree too as I don't think we should have unlicensed folk with guns shooting at things. At the least, it limits them.

    Essentially licensing is a force to limit, and in certain things I think that's good.

  22. Re:I don't see it as such a bad thing. by antiMStroll · · Score: 2, Funny

    Send me $65 and I'll provide a document which let's you say you're better licensed than a Lousiana-licensed TV repairman to work on computers. It'll be about as valid and the money will be about as well spent.

  23. And so dies a whole genre of pr0n movies by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Funny

    The tv repair man producing his tools and getting it from the lady of the house and 2 of her most intimate friends was a fantasy but a geek connecting his laptop to the tv and getting the same treatment is just so not going to happen.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  24. All Governments are inherently evil by Bodhammer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who is John Galt?

    There is no nonsense so errant that it cannot be made the creed of the vast majority by adequate governmental action.
    Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970)

    For every action there is an equal and opposite government program.
    Bob Wells

    Government is too big and too important to be left to the politicians.
    Chester Bowles (1901 - 1986)

    After two years in Washington, I often long for the realism and sincerity of Hollywood.
    Fred Thompson, Speech before the Commonwealth Club of California

    You know what's interesting about Washington? It's the kind of place where second-guessing has become second nature.
    George W. Bush, Speech on May 17, 2002
    Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under.

    H. L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
    I believe that all government is evil, and that trying to improve it is largely a waste of time.
    H. L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)

    The government consists of a gang of men exactly like you and me. They have, taking one with another, no special talent for the business of government; they have only a talent for getting and holding office.
    H. L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)

    Whenever you have an efficient government you have a dictatorship.
    Harry S Truman (1884 - 1972), Lecture at Columbia University, 28 Apr. 1959

    You will find that the State is the kind of organization which, though it does big things badly, does small things badly, too.
    John Kenneth Galbraith (1908 - )

    The mystery of government is not how Washington works but how to make it stop.
    P. J. O'Rourke (1947 - )

    Sure there are dishonest men in local government. But there are dishonest men in national government too.
    Richard M. Nixon (1913 - 1994)

    So they [the Government] go on in strange paradox, decided only to be undecided, resolved to be irresolute, adamant for drift, solid for fluidity, all-powerful to be impotent.
    Sir Winston Churchill (1874 - 1965), Hansard, November 12, 1936

    Disbelief in magic can force a poor soul into believing in government and business.
    Tom Robbins (1936 - )

    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    Voltaire (1694 - 1778)

    I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts.
    Will Rogers (1879 - 1935), Saturday Review, Aug. 25, 1962

    There's no trick to being a humorist when you have the whole government working for you.
    Will Rogers (1879 - 1935)

    The marvel of all history is the patience with which men and women submit to burdens unnecessarily laid upon them by their governments.
    William H. Borah

    --
    "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
  25. Good grief by Flower · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Just pass the cost to your customers and make a tidy profit at it over time. If someone complains explain the whole stupid situation for them and they can vote the idiots out of office.

    Like this isn't what will happen anyway.

    --
    I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
  26. Recording+Playback by StormReaver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    During either the DeCSS suit, the DMCA hearings, or a RIAA/MPAA suit (I can't remember which), the court specifically ruled that computers were not playback and recording devices and thus did not fall into the realm of protected devices for fair use copying.

    Either computers are not such devices as the court ruling indicated, and thus this money grab is illegal, or computers are such devices and thus protected by fair use copying exemptions to the chagrin of the RIAA/MPAA.

  27. Don't pooh pooh it by OYAHHH · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For those of you,

    Who are staring down the double barreled outsourcing monster you might want to consider a talent for fixing TVs as a godsend.

    I mean, who in their right mind is gonna ship a 60 inch plasma TV to india for repair? Gotta be done locally, get the drift....

    Plus, from everything I've ever seen those TV repair guys make some pretty good dough while getting to play with all kinds of electronic gadgetry.

    --
    Caution: Contents under pressure
  28. Not a first for Louisiana by DrLudicrous · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Apparently, Louisiana is well-known for this kind of crap. In order to be a florist in Louisiana, you have to be licensed. Achieving this requires taking a $150 exam before a committee. Of course, the committee is composed of other local florists, to whom you represent competition. For a quick blurb on this, and the effort to eradicate (which has already failed), check out:

    http://www.2theadvocate.com/stories/071504/opi_edi 2001.shtml

  29. This is great.!!!!!!!!! by YankeeInExile · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have always heard rumors of Marijuana Tax Stamps and the like, so I did a little googling. Here's a random sample from Kansas:

    Drug dealers, as defined above, are required by law to purchase tax stamps from the Department of Revenue's Business Tax Bureau (K.S.A. 79-5204). In order to protect against any possible violation of the self-incrimination constitutional protection, a dealer is not required to give his/her name or address when purchasing stamps and the Business Tax Bureau is prohibited from sharing any information relating to the purchase of drug tax stamps with law enforcement or anyone else
    There is other text http://www.ksrevenue.org/faqs-abcdrugtax.htm for your amusement.
    --
    How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
    1. Re:This is great.!!!!!!!!! by gandy909 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um, these days, won't a simple "...we think they may be, or are contributing to, terrorism..." be enough to trump that law and grab what info they have, as well as the video cam tapes of them buying the stamps...?

      --

      (Stolen sig) Remember: it's a "Microsoft virus", not an "email virus", a "Microsoft worm", not a "computer worm
    2. Re:This is great.!!!!!!!!! by gamgee5273 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's so the prosecutors can add an additional charge when they arrest the drug dealer, that's all. Remember, Al Capone was not put away for killing people or shooting up businesses. He was put away, in Alcatraz, for tax evasion...

  30. What's a "repair"? by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What specific actions constitute a "repair"?

    Backing up a hard drive?
    Swapping one hard drive for another?
    Swapping one hard drive for another because the first had failed?
    Re-installing Windows?
    Replacing Windows with Linux?
    Modifying the Windows registry?
    Unplugging one mouse and plugging in another?
    Brushing dirt from the lens of a (optical) mouse?
    Moving files around?

    There are so many ways that a computer can "break" that don't require getting out your soldering iron... I'd think it'd be difficult to differentiate between someone who "repairs" computers and someone who "supports" computers.

    1. Re:What's a "repair"? by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Replacing Windows with Linux? I haven't heard of that one, but who knows.

      There are those who consider that any PC with Windows installed is "broken" in any number of ways and can only be fixed by means of drastic measures. The point, of course, is that in order to require "repair men" to obtain a license, you'd have to come up with some sort of definition of what constitutes a "repair," or of the conditions under which a computer is "broken."

      I'm not saying old people are dumb, it's just hard for them sometimes to understand what a desktop is.

      Okay, I'll bite: what's a desktop?

      Answer: the desktop is an illusion, and a vague metaphor. Back in the early days of Macintosh, the metaphor a bit more concrete than it is now. In addition to the Trash and document icons that looked like sheets of paper, we had desk accessories similar to those you might find on a real desk (scrap book, puzzle, clock, note pad, etc.) and applications that tried hard to support the "desktop" metaphor. Most importantly, Apple shipped an introductory program which explained the metaphor and taught people to do things like point, click, drag, and use menus. These days, GUI's are a lot more complicated, and there's an awful lot that doesn't fit into the desktop metaphor at all. Many, if not most, applications are designed with complete disregard for the metaphor. In short, the "desktop" notion has pretty well outlived its usefulness. It's no surprise that new users (young or old) have a hard time figuring out what a "desktop" is, because today's interfaces give you darn little clue.

      I can't wait in 50 years when most people will have grown up with computers and the basics of them will be familiar.

      Fifty years from now, we'll have about as much clue about the tech du jour as our grandparents have now. Stuff most people would consider "basics" will almost certainly change. The "desktop" business will surely have given up the ghost by then, and people will have a hard time undestanding why you'd want to have a "central" processing unit. New tech based on multistate circuitry could make binary computing seem quaint. Global warming and astronomically expensive energy may give people some badly needed perspective and actually reduce our reliance on electronics. Who knows?

      So the first time you hear yourself tell your grandchildren "Back when I was your age, we used machines called 'computers' to do that...", just remember: you heard it here first.

  31. People still call for TV repairmen? by ejaw5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps I've been lucky (knock on wood) but TVs seem to last a long time with little maintenance. I figure when a TV finally does bite the dust, its served its lifetime well and about time to buy a new one anyway. People aren't calling repairmen to fix knob-controlled tv's embededded into wood frames are they? (wish they had kept the form design around though)

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
  32. TV reapir dudes by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    just my anecdotal, but I've been to two differnt TV repair shops in the past two years,once for a monitor repair (not worth it cost wise but possible) and once for a vcr part (unobtanium) both places had stacks of computers and monitors in them, and the guys there did all manner of repairs, in fact, more repairs on computers (real repairs, not just component swapping) than the average whitebox shop I have been in. I found both the guys to be quite hip and knowledgeable computer users and techs. They got into the biz because they loved gadgets and had the attitude and aptitude for it, so it's a simple transition to working on boxes. One came from a dotmilgov tech background, the other from a hobbyist to a civvie tech school background.

    FWIW

  33. Re:Best Idea ever by v1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's what A+, CNE, etc are for. Pay money, pass a test that actually represents your level of expertise in the field, and get a time-limited certification showing competance. What we have here though is just an obvious money grab.

    Though that being said, I seriously doubt any more than 2% of the customers that come into our shop think to look for (or ask about) our technicians' certifications. Though I seriously wonder if any of the remaining 98% would know the difference between a "I paid $200 and passed a test any computer user could pass" cert and a "this took me three attempts at $150 each and six weeks of study to pass" cert.

    I'd also be willing to bet 50% of the techs working at computer service shops have zero certifications. The only reason I have certs is because we can't order service parts from the manufacturers without them.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  34. Similar Law in Minnesota by teslakid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Recectly, the state of Minnesota decided that only Certified Electricians can legally install low voltage electrical cable, which includes network and alarm system wiring. Here's http://www.mwpersons.com/articles/3-12-01-licensin g.htmlone man's story with a link to the relevant code. Gotta make sure those network cables don't electrocute anybody.

  35. Actually... by ElForesto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm already running for office (3rd time), and I'm the county chair of a political party (not the Republicrats). And now to address your points...

    Driver's licenses do not do anything to ensure safe driving. Not wanting to get into an accident ensures safe driving. Not wanting to get cited or hauled to jail ensures safe driving. How does paying a couple of dollars every few years (with no testing) ensure that I drive safer? It doesn't. I would personally feel safer if the truly unsafe drivers (speeding to excess, reckless driving, DUI, etc.) were thrown in jail for extended periods. Maybe it would discourage the bad behaviours.

    Marriage licenses were originally meant to prevent inter-racial marriages. I prefer the system of common law marriage as a license is a permit to do something that would otherwise be illegal. When did normal marriage become illegal? I support keeping them around for people that want to quickly bypass waiting periods and such.

    Fishing and hunting licenses don't make a dime's worth of difference in population control. It just ends up amounting to another case of "papers, please". Why the heck do most states require an SSN for one of those? It's just another control for the sake of control.

    You're wrong on what a license is. See above: a license is a permit to do something that would otherwise be illegal. I'm very suspicious of any attempt to make something illegal and replace its legality with a licensing system.

    --
    There is a difference between "insightful" and "inciteful" other than spelling.
    1. Re:Actually... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Driver's licenses do not do anything to ensure safe driving.

      You're wrong. (So is this weirdo).

      How does paying a couple of dollars every few years (with no testing) ensure that I drive safer?

      You're incorrectly focusing on license-renewal, which is actually less important than the initial issuance, which is what really improves safety. Or do you think that I'd really be fine to allow 14-year olds to get in cars and do 65 on the highway without at least first convincing a backseat cop that he's fundamentally competent?

  36. Re:IAAL by HermanAB · · Score: 3, Funny
    So what test does Americans have to pass to get a Marriage license?

    So American girls can go around and say: I'm a licensed bride? Would a hooker be an 'unlicensed bride?'

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  37. This is great by Deanasc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For the low LOW price of 55 bucks I can pad my resume with "Radio and TV Repairman".

    --
    I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
  38. I looked, but couldn't find it by tkrotchko · · Score: 3, Funny

    " Let us not forget that an improperly wired CRT will emit X Rays."

    According to this link:
    http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/consumer/TVRad.html

    There's never been a case where this has happened. Is this because its not possible to do, or because all TV repairmen are licensed and all exercise extreme caution when wiring CRTs?

    Incidentally, do you know anyone who has ever rewired a CRT? When is a re-wiring advisable? Is it an annual thing, or just when the wires get old?

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:I looked, but couldn't find it by gunmenrock · · Score: 2, Informative

      The flyback on your average monitor puts out about 14KV. Most chassis' will dissipate that pretty quickly when the monitor is powered down, but caution is still advisable. Getting bit by the flyback won't kill you (unless you have a pacemaker or something), but it will knock you on your ass... As far as rewiring a CRT (meaning the pix tube itself), no, you shouldn't ever have to do it. Why would you? The only wire that even "goes" to the CRT is the anode coming off the flyback. You shouldn't ever, ever cut that, let alone splice it and wrap it in a little electrical tape. Everything else is right on the chassis or neckboard. There are a couple of wires that run to the CRT socket on the neckboard, but those shouldn't ever need to be cut either... in the event of swapping out a neckboard (no, don't do that either) or a CRT socket (maybe), those wires should be desoldered right at the socket. I work with monitors, CRTs, etc., frequently (I fix arcade games). There's a lot of misinformation here. Misinformation can be dangerous... like the people who say "to discharge a CRT, ground it to your wall socket!" Wrong wrong wrong. That won't do anything. You need to discharge to a RELATIVE ground; I.E. - the chassis' ground. A CRT is basically a bigass glass capacitor. OK. Rant over. Need coffee. I'll read this later to see if it's even coherent.

  39. No, they are scum by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Informative
    If there was any sort of testing involved, I'd buy it. I understanding licensing when there is a test. The point is to try and ensure some minimal level of competence. True, a written test does not necessitate real world skills, but at least it weeds out the total bozos.

    Like take car audio. Many (most even) manufacturers won't warentee their equipment unless it's "professionally installed". The reason is because there exists the good likelyhood of fuckup if some dumb teenager just wires it up themselves (it's much easier to fuck up car audio than home audio). So just what is a professional? Well it's someone that is a Mobile Electronics Certified Professional, MECP. It's a simple written test akin to the A+ for computers. It's not proof you are a master with electronics, but at least it means you should know which wire is positive and how to ground a system.

    So, if it was something along these lines, that you had to be A+ certified, or have some computer certification, I could see the point, though not necessiarly support it. In that case the point would be to ensure minimal competence, that someone could know you were state licensed, meaning you'd apssed a standard test and so weren't just a complete liar that knows nothing of computers.

    That is not the case. All you do is send them $55. Oh give me a break, that probes nothing other than that you have (had) $55. It's like those diploma mills on the Internet. Sure it says PhD, but since all you did was give them money for it, it holds no actual meaning or value.

  40. it is what you think it is by humankind · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Being in New Orleans, I got wind of this about a week ago and was amused - there's a grass roots effort to oppose this bone-headed idea. Unfortunately, this is a prime example of how chaotic and irrational the government down here is. Everything you've heard is basically true.

    We spawn politicians that have the dubious distinction of removing park benches as a means to stop homeless people, school board members that spend more money on lawsuits than they do schools, a monopoly daily newspaper that all throughout 1999 referred to the year 2000 as "the millennium" with a small blurb that said, "some purists believe the millennium begins in 2001", neo-nazi state representatives, indicted governors, etc. The former governor repealed the mandatory helmet law for motorcyclists... I could go on and on... This is one messed up area... This latest fiasco is more of the same.

  41. You're obviously not from Louisiana... by mrbrown1602 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Louisiana is a different place than the rest of the country. First off, the state uses Napoleanic Code (which is derived from Roman Law) while the rest of the nation is using English Common Law. Every governmental position in the state is elected, NONE are appointed.

    Secondly, the state has continously put political machines into office. Fmr. Gov. Edwin Edwards (3-term governor) is currently serving a prison sentence in Dallas because of a variety of charges, basically stemming from taking bribes from casinos. Then back in the day, we had Huey Long, followed by his brother Earl Long. Huey even had a box where he kept all the kickbacks from state businesses and employees.

    Hell, to become a notary public in Louisiana, you've got to get approval from the Governor!

    The state has some of the most corrupt, crooked, and just plain old screwed up politics in the nation. Every profession you can think of has to be licensed - and especially now, because the state is running low on cash (thank you Kathleen Blanco), taxes are extremely high.

    Most businesses just stay out of Louisiana since the cost of doing business there, unless you know somebody, is extreme. Its good-ole-boy politics at its finest.

  42. Regulating shysters? by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the problems I've seen in the consumer end of the computer industry is that practically anyone can call themselves a "computer technician" and fix the things. I've seen people ripped off horribly. Case in point, my wife has a friend who was told "Once there's a virus on your hard disk, it's there forever - for $200 we'll provide a new one, install all your software on it, and safely dispose of the old one". No, that's not the rip-off because I fixed the thing for her instead - the initial purchase of the system and all its pirate software was in this instance, but I've got a dozen similar tales dating back fifteen years. Registration doesn't indicate competence, but it does mean that they've needed to provide a fee and adequate identification to the state before setting out their shingle. It makes it that much more likely that in the event of a problem you can track them down. It makes it a little less likely for the more overt shonks to set up shop for a month or two then move. It's annoying for the legitimate businesses, but might under some circumstances help keep the less desirable out. Of course, then we have the ongoing problem of who is deemed "undesirable", and with computers being able to be viewed as playback or encryption devices we have a whole other can of worms.

  43. Work Stoppage by NightMgr · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, if you work for the state or local government and do computer support, go into work tomorrow and announce you've applied for the license, but haven't received it yet. Sorry, Senator/Judge/Mayor/Officical who decided you need a license, but I can't reset your password because I don't have a license. You'll just have to wait a few weeks until I receive it.

  44. 5 years lifespan for hardware good??? by fantomas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "I opened it up, fixed it and have been using it for nearly 5 years. Not a bad lifespan for a free piece of hardware."


    Only in the computing industry... I have some of my dad's powertools (10 years old), drive my grandmother's car (39 years old), got some of my great granddad's hand tools (70? years old). The computing model really annoys me, this is just not sustainable, the world is drowning under a sea of thrown out crap. Why can't we build stuff to last a bit longer? or more significantly design systems that can work with older kit... Me, sick of software bloat. Even new distros of linux assume 2Gb hard drives and 128Mb Ram minimum. All my mum wants to do is email, and word process. I'm sure I managed this ten years ago. Surely must be achievable without hardcore linux geekhacking skills. We realy should try to develop a more long term design philosophy. I've got a three year old mobile phone, Ericsson, shockproofed, gortex lined, you can drop it in a pond and fish it out and use it, no problem. They don't make them any more. My guess is - because people like me buy them and don't need to buy another one six months later. We really need a big paradigm shift...(imho)

  45. Huh? by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would imagine that TV repairmen were originally regulated because they had to know how to safely work on open TV cabinets containing dangerous high voltages, operate test equipment on those high voltage circuits, and install suitable replacement parts that wouldn't catch on fire.

    So you're saying that the government should require anyone who cracks open a TV set to have a license? No more fix-it-at-home episodes? Billy Bob can't drink a six-pack, get out the screwdriver and augment his gymnastics skills with the flyback transformer?

    Licenses are required to protect consumers from ripoff artists. Otherwise, you'd have corner shops with con artists "fixing" TVs.
    Back in the old days of tube TVs, it was very easy to take a damaged TV from a naive client, declare it a total loss by "demonstrating" how badly the TV was broken, and offer to buy it for $25 as a "parts" chassis.
    Then, put all the tubes back in, fix the original minor problem for $10, tune it up a little and sell it for $200 to someone else. Then wait for the next moron to walk through the door and attempt to swindle them too! A state agency with a licensing plan has a complaint system. Several complaints, and an inspector stops in, maybe to suspend the license.

    Back in the 60's and 70's, you could find tube testers at the hardware and grocery stores. Anyone with a screwdriver and some patience could at least get their TV up and running by bringing in dead tubes, checking them in the tube tester, and replacing them. Tuning was a bit more tricky, but it was possible if you learned a few tricks.

    Editorial Mode: ON
    PCs are simply a pain-in-the-ass. After chasing hardware and software problems for other people for the past 15+ years, I tell you, it's not worth $75 an hour to do it. The calls never stop, and most people generally believe that each incident is directly related to the first service call. They feel that they should only have to pay $75 once, and that everything after that is free. If you enjoy peace and quiet, strict enforcement of the $75/hour fee is required. If you perform one favor, somehow, everyone hears about it and you've got dozens of others who expect the same treatment. It's not worth it.

    The only thing worse than fixing PCs is fixing someone else's stovepipe network!

    --
    -- No sig for you!
  46. Sort of ... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Interesting
    You can actually buy marijuana tax stamps, which you are required to place on all bags of the stuff.


    While it is true they require you to have the tax stamps, they haven't actually sold the tax stamps in a whole lot of years.

    Since they never actually issue the stamps, nobody can ever be in compliance with the law. Therefore, they effectively make it illegal since they don't give you a (real) route to make it legal.

    Go ahead, try and get yourself some of those stamps. :-P

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.