Slashdot Mirror


Human Powered Helicopter

marcopo writes "In response to a 24 year old prize challenge from the American Helicopter Society, a number of engineering students at the University of British Columbia have designed a human powered helicopter. The prize requirements are 3 minutes flight at 3 meters, with only human power, and the team, led by UBC's Mike Georgallis, plans a test flight next Tuesday. The Vancouver Sun also has the story."

10 of 209 comments (clear)

  1. Interesting FAQ Question by danratherfan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    12.) WILL IT FLY? The machine is heavier than originally designed... The unknown at the moment is whether the machine will break up prior to lift off. Whether or not any system will break up becomes all the more relevant when it involves humans and rotating blades.

  2. Bah, fraternities have had this for a long time by xsupergr0verx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Instruction manual:
    1. Place helmet on head. Take a swig from your hip flask. Decide you don't need the helmet.
    2. Spread arms parallel to ground.
    3. Hum 'whirrrr' as you spin yourself to speed.
    4. Upon striking your head on the floor on the way down, remark how free you feel in the open air.

    --

    Click here for a free picture of an iPod!
  3. Do corpses burn hot enough for a steam engine? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's the only real question. They should be more careful wording the requirement.

    1. Re:Do corpses burn hot enough for a steam engine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      From the rules:
      4.2.2 No member of the crew shall be permitted to leave or enter the aircraft at any time during takeoff or flight.
      Drifting away as smoke and ash is probably included ...
  4. Long way. by Malicious · · Score: 5, Interesting

    3 Meters is a pretty high distance to fall from, even without being surrounded by fast moving metal, cogs, and chains. Considering that they'll want to optimize the weight of the machine, there will almost certainly be no safety cage or equipment.
    I sure as hell wouldn't want to pilot it.

    --
    01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
    1. Re:Long way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I sure as hell wouldn't want to pilot it.

      That's why you're posting on Slashdot and not doing anything useful. Same with me.

    2. Re:Long way. by lommer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      First of all, three meters isn't all that much, it's roughly 10 feet. Second, you're not surrounded by that much metal cogs and chains. As you pointed out they want to reduce weight, so almost the entire thing is built of composites. Further, if you read about the design, they are favouring larger, slower-moving rotors and associated equipment over faster smaller ones. Thirdly, any engineer worth his salt would take time to make sure that if the machine DID fall from 3 meters, the supports for the person/seat could be constructed to collapse and absorb the shock.

      Finally, as with most under-powered helicopters, the most likely mode of failure is only being able to hop a couple feet off the ground, if they can lift off at all. Read up some helicopter flying books sometime, it's pretty inderesting how much more the ground effect affects them than fixed wing aircraft. This post is much longer than inteded, so I'll cut here with the conclusion that I if I could fly helicopters, I'd jump on this opportunity in seconds. That said, flying a helicopter is probably one of the hardest things I've ever tried to do (I'm a fixed-wing pilot).

  5. Re:The Fred Flintstone Chopper by plover · · Score: 5, Funny
    More like the Fred Flintstone web server.

    "Pedal faster, Barney, we're getting slashdotted!"

    "Uh, gee, Fred, I don't think we should pedal any faster in this thing..."

    "Just shut up and pedal, Barney, we'll be -- "

    "FRED FLINTSTONE! YOU COME DOWN FROM THERE RIGHT THIS INSTANT!!"

    "But Wilma, the slashdotters want to see our pictures."

    "THIS INSTANT!"

    "Yes, Wilma."

    [ mechanical sproink sound ]

    "Aww, gee, Fred, I told you this thing wouldn't last."

    --
    John
  6. 500 Watts by pHatidic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In case anyone here doesnt know about generating watts, 500 sustained for over 3 minutes is quite a task. I have been rowing for 7 years and this year our team had physiological testing where we started at 200 watts and increased by 50 every 2 minutes. I last about 8 minutes and managed to hit about 400 watts but couldnt hold it long enough to be allowed to continue to 450. We increased in this manner in order to find our VO2 maxes, and certainly had I started at 500 watts I could have held it for a while, maybe a minute and a half. But 3 minutes is just sick. Especially since this was on the rowing machine which uses all muscles and this guy is only uses his legs, no back and arms. This 3 minute test will generate enough lactic acid to kill the average 60 year old man, and will certainly leave him in excruciating pain if he is able to do it at all.

    1. Re:500 Watts by Zooka · · Score: 5, Informative
      Even if he can't, I'll bet money that Lance Armstrong or a similarly well-conditioned pro cyclist can hold this thing off the ground easily.
      I bet it will indeed take an exceptional athlete such as Armstrong to measure up to the task.
      Example:
      "Data from several researchers shows that professional cyclists produce power outputs of between 320 and 450 watts during time trials ranging from 5 to 70 km in major tours."
      "Dr. Alejandro Lucia, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Spain, has predicted that Lance Armstrong on his ascent of the Alpe D¹Huez (a 14 km climb of 8% mean gradient) in the 2001 Tour de France produced one of the greatest performances in the history of cycling: 38 minutes of near-maximal to maximal effort at an estimated mean power output as high as 475-500 watts! His average speed was 22 kilometers/hour, which he reached at a mean cadence of about 100-rpm using a 39 x 23 gear. Lance would have been averaging about 7 watts/kg."
      http://www.polarusa.com/consumer/powerkit/Article2 .asp