Slashdot Mirror


Cosmos Solar Sail Getting Close To Launch

digitalcaffeine writes "The Guardian is reporting that US and Russian scientists are planning to launch a spacecraft that will use solar sails to move about in space. This venture, called Cosmos 1, is backed by the Planetary Society and Cosmos Studios. The spacecraft, finally due for launch in late 2004 or early 2005, will use a converted SS-N-18 submarine launched ballistic missile fired from beneath the Barents Sea to get it into a 800 x 1000 km elliptical orbit. It will then unfurl its 15m sails and start moving about. So, for all the governments that have been working on a similar project, the first solar-sailed spacecraft is going to be from a private venture." An update on the official site notes that "The world's first solar sail craft is nearing completion. All electronic systems are now flight qualified and were delivered to the spacecraft for final assembly and testing" - we previously reported on the Cosmos Project and the efficacy of solar sails.

50 of 182 comments (clear)

  1. Who retasked the Guidance System? by aelbric · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hope they were reliable. Somehow I don't think NORAD will care for excuses if an SS-N-18 starts dropping towards Chicago.

    --
    nos laetus epulor qui would domito nos
  2. But... by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    will it be ready in time to get Count Dooku back to Coruscant?

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  3. SS-N-18? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A private venture has had access to an intercontinental missile??

    1. Re:SS-N-18? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Minus the warhead, but yeah- it's amazing what you can find these days on ebay. Just enter "Russia" and "Surplus".

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  4. Just like with Columbus... by k4_pacific · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... most people expect it sail off the edge of the world.

    --
    Unknown host pong.
  5. Cold War Rockets Better? by cephyn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think its great that former weapons are being used for constructive science. Continues a long tradition. Plus, I bet those missiles are the most reliable chemical launch vehicles around -- the military does not mess around when trying to kill people, and frowns heavily on equipment failure. (as a rule)

    And was all that talk (Sagan's wife) about it being visible to the world true? Or was it metaphorical? I can't imagine it being THAT big at this point...

    --
    Moo.
  6. Space debris by tao_of_biology · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That sail makes a nice big, easy to penetrate target (no BBW jokes, please).

    The article describes the sail as thinner than a garbage back. Even the tiniest speck of space junk would would easily blow a hole in this. And, if that happens enough times, and especially with bigger pieces of space junk, won't it be filled with thousands of various sized holes?

    It doesn't seem like it's being put into orbit high enough to avoid this kind of damage. Obviously they thought of this... are the holes inconsequential?

    --

    -- "A chicken is an egg's way of making another egg."

    1. Re:Space debris by Carnildo · · Score: 4, Informative

      It doesn't seem like it's being put into orbit high enough to avoid this kind of damage. Obviously they thought of this... are the holes inconsequential?

      Pretty much. The material is so thin, holes made by space debris won't be larger than the debris itself, and most of the stuff up there is sandgrain size or smaller. Given the size of the sail, a bajillion pinholes won't reduce the effective area much.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  7. Japanese solar sail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Japanese solar sail by PaulBu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      From the official site:

      The mission goal - to fly the first controlled solar sail flight - remains the same.

      I guess the "controlled" part is important. The sail itself is actually a set of blades which can be tilted to steer the craft.

      Paul B.

    2. Re:Japanese solar sail by Celt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      America had nothing to do with it so it did'ent happen :)
      Actually has anyone been to the space museum beside the meteor crater in Arizona? It lists everything about space except in leaves out one minor detail Russia never went to space apparently

      --
      "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
  8. Re:IANARS by Gothmolly · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're thinking of the Bussard Ramjet. Solar sails use the momentum of light as thrust, as opposed to sucking up interstellar gas. This has all been covered before, recently even, in a Slashdot article about the Japanese solar sail project.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  9. Solar Sails... by Icarus1919 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now that we have solar sails, it's only a matter of time before we need to start worrying about space pirates.

    Where's Samus when you need her?

  10. Re:Wind gusts by cephyn · · Score: 5, Informative

    They can be hard to stop its true, except when approaching another star, which is the ultimate goal for the technology. The wind from Star B pushes back, slowing it down. When it achieves proper orbit speed, it furls the sails.

    Within the solar system, the idea is you get the solar wind to push hard enough to achieve a certain speed, then you furl the sails and it coasts into the new orbit.

    --
    Moo.
  11. Re:IANARS by Sheetrock · · Score: 2
    It's space, so it'll never lose velocity as a result of drag. There's lots of other suns out there too, so it can pick up more speed if it passes through other solar systems.

    Besides, it should see lots of stuff on its way out.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




  12. Re:Mars? by cephyn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    you just build a bigger sail. It's light, and that's the point. HUGE sails are possible in a weightless environment, and a bigger sail harnesses more energy.

    --
    Moo.
  13. Why use the sub? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Geez, talk about adding needless complexity and risk. Too many Russian subs submerge more times than they surface.

    So why the sub? Extra publicity?

    1. Re:Why use the sub? by Kesha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree, but I think it's because it's the cheapest rocket they can ride on. A commercial launch of SS-N-18 from a submarine is a double win for the Russian NAVY - they essentially get paid for a "live" battle drill. It helps them evaluate their battle readiness and get paid in the process. It would make sense for them to make this launch affordable, but with a few strings attached, such as launching from a submerged sub.

      Of course, this is what I think is happening, I can't be sure exactly...

      Paul.

    2. Re:Why use the sub? by harborpirate · · Score: 4, Informative

      For the sub launch, another poster helpfully posted the following information:

      Near Earth, Solar Sails are particularly suited for high orbital inclination satellite missions. Weather forecasting and global positioning systems would directly benefit from satellites orbiting the poles. Most satellites take advantage of the natural speed of Earth's rotation to boost them into an orbit relatively close to the equatorial plane. Changing the plane requires a large fuel burn for a conventional rocket and greatly increases launch costs. With its small but continuous thrust, a solar sail can reach polar orbits without a massive fuel payload, making them more accessible to scientific research.

      It would appear that the scientists want to insert the satellite into a polar orbit, which is confirmed by the fact that the launch point will be the Barents Sea, part of the Arctic Ocean. Since this location is a rather inhospitable region for a conventional launch, the scientists have rather ingeniously selected a submarine launch. The Russian military is highly likely to be the provider making this available for a "reasonable" price, since the mission is scientific in nature. Thus it poses no threat to them, while providing profit where it is much needed.

      The reason for using a ballistic missle is that Russia is brimming with extra ballistic missles. They've been decommisioning hundreds, if not thousands of former nuclear missles over the last couple decades. This does not mean they've destroyed the entire missle, merely that the nuclear warheads have been removed, and they're no longer housed in silos or subs for launch against other countries. Since the rockets were designed to carry nuclear payloads, they are both powerful and highly reliable. This obviously makes them an ideal platform for carrying anything into orbit which they can be fitted to carry.

      This situation is really a win-win propostion. The scientists get a powerful, highly reliable launch platform and rocket in an inhospitable launch location for likely a rather sweet price. The Russian military gets rid of a decommisoned rocket they just had laying around anyway, and gets to run one of their subs through a launch test complete with the actual launching of a rocket, plus they make a profit on the deal.

      --
      // harborpirate
      // Slashbots off the starboard bow!
  14. 15m Solar Sails a bit small? by Kotukunui · · Score: 3, Interesting

    IANASSE (Solar Sail Expert), but 15m sounds a little small. I mean we are talking about pushing a satellite around with *photons*. I guess the amount of energy required to move a spacecraft in orbit is miniscule. I remember reading an article about early space efforts that said something like "the smallest rocket motors are little more than cap-gun ammunition but, they are sufficient to nudge a spacecraft in orbit"

    1. Re:15m Solar Sails a bit small? by frizzbit · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yes it is a small area but remember that in space there's no air resistance and friction of any kind to sap your speed so even a small acceleration can build up to an enormous speed over time.

      The key question is the weight of the craft. On the Planetary Society website they state that the mass of their craft is 100kg. Sunlight in Earth orbit is able to exert about 9.12 microNewtons of force per square metre. So a sail 15m^2 will be pushed by up to 137 microNewtons. This tiny force applied to the weight of the craft would be able to achieve an acceleration about 1.4microns per second^2. This is a tiny acceleration so it will take a long time to get anywhere but eventually the change in speed will add up. For example, it would take a year to accelerate to 155km/h (approx. 100miles per hour)

      They also state some example accelerations but they seem to imply the weight of the craft of only 275 grams so they must be talking about a sail accelerating alone without a payload. The much lower mass makes a huge difference. Such a light craft could achieve 16km/s in a year and make a journey to any planet in the solar system within 5 years.

    2. Re:15m Solar Sails a bit small? by Chuck1318 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The 15m figure is the length of one of eight triangular vanes that make up the sail. According to the FAQ the total area is 600 square meters.

  15. Using this technology by thephotoman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What would this technology be used for in the short-term, though? It seems to me that without an immediate way to utilize this solar sail, there cannot be a profitable business application. It belongs more in the realm of the government at this time, as the government doesn't need to turn a profit.

    --
    Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
  16. Solar sail mechanics? by delibes · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Can anyone shed light (sorry, bad pun) on the following:

    1) The 5 year solar sail propelled mission to Pluto - is there a way to decelerate as you reach Pluto? Actually, is it really 5 years constant thrust or does the solar sail's thrust decrease as an inverse square law as you get more distant from the sun?

    2) Can you sail "upstream" into the solar wind? Is it possible to tack and jibe in a solar sail propelled craft?!

    --
    This is not a sig
    1. Re:Solar sail mechanics? by MyHair · · Score: 3, Informative

      1: Rocket propelled probes so far don't decelerate (much?); they just enter orbit with careful aiming.

      2: Tacking in a water-based sailboat uses the water to prevent lateral motion. Try sailing without any sort of keel/centerboard or asymmetric hulls or rudder--you can't go towards the wind this way. Hmmm...I wonder if chemical or ion propulsion could be used as lateral resistance with solar sails in an analog to hybrid gas/electric cars...would there be any economy or advantage to that?

    2. Re:Solar sail mechanics? by barawn · · Score: 2, Informative


      How? The flight path is always away from the Sun when you're on your way to pluto.


      No solar sail could ever fully oppose the Sun's gravity unless it was, I dunno, half the size of Jupiter's orbit or something. OK, maybe not that large. But it'd be huge.

      All you're doing is adding to your orbital speed by tilting the sail to accelerate along that direction. So you slowly spiral outwards.

      To return, you just do the opposite: slow your rotation, and you spiral inward. You'll have to be careful to alter orbit at several points to circularize it (so you're not going at an insane speed when you hit the inner solar system), but it can be done.

  17. Interesting Uses for Solar Sails by Zentakz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Posted before under the Japanese Solar Sail Deployment:
    Though Solar Sails are often associated with interstellar travel they have many extremely useful applications in Earth orbit and local solar system exploration. Most potential applications take advantage of the continuous thrust and zero fuel payload of a solar sail.

    Near Earth, Solar Sails are particularly suited for high orbital inclination satellite missions. Weather forecasting and global positioning systems would directly benefit from satellites orbiting the poles. Most satellites take advantage of the natural speed of Earth's rotation to boost them into an orbit relatively close to the equatorial plane. Changing the plane requires a large fuel burn for a conventional rocket and greatly increases launch costs. With its small but continuous thrust, a solar sail can reach polar orbits without a massive fuel payload, making them more accessible to scientific research.

    Away from Earth, Solar Sails offer a number of other interesting options. Missions have been proposed for asteroid rendezvous, travel to the inner planets (yes, solar sails can travel toward the sun), and an interesting idea using Lagrange points. More advanced solar sails could use their continuous thrust to enlarge the regions where they are able to "hover" well away from Earth. This allows much better observation of solar activity. Solar sails not only have an appealing sci-fi flair, but appear to be quite practical as well. I hope to see the technology develop rapidly.

    1. Re:Interesting Uses for Solar Sails by MyHair · · Score: 2, Interesting

      (yes, solar sails can travel toward the sun)

      Um, how? I just got done posting that you couldn't sail into the "wind" without some form of lateral resistance. Inquiring minds want to know...

      Or is it just a matter of using solar energy to slow down solar orbiting speed to 'fall' towards the sun?

    2. Re:Interesting Uses for Solar Sails by cephyn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      using the sail to slow down is one way. the other way would be the same way a sailboat sails into the wind, no?

      --
      Moo.
    3. Re:Interesting Uses for Solar Sails by Moofie · · Score: 4, Informative

      Tacking into the wind requires a keel, and there's no corollary with a solar sail. You can use the sail to slow down, though, decreasing your orbital energy and bringing you towards the sun.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  18. Re:IANARS by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But I thought the idea of solar sails had been scrapped due to the relaitve scarcity of interstellar hydrogen?

    Actually, light alone is sufficient to produce thrust. The problem is that at 1.3kw/m^2 (the power that reaches Earth), you're not going to go very fast with the mass of the solar sails added on.

    I've been keeping an eye on Mini-Magnetospheric Plasma Propulsion (M2P2) technology, myself. Basically, it uses an EM field to increase the surface area of the ship without the added weight of solar sails. As a bonus, the ship is protected from the most common forms of radiation and cosmic rays. The concept is particularly interesting when one digs the Orion concept out of memory.

    The biggest problems with Orion were plate ablation and scalability concerns (scaling DOWN, not up). With an M2P2 shield, you could use larger pulsed units, and there's no plate to erode. As a bonus, radiation protection comes as a nice side-effect. (Although some steel would still be needed to block neutron radiation.)

  19. Re:Wind gusts by jcr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Within the solar system, the idea is you get the solar wind to push hard enough to achieve a certain speed, then you furl the sails and it coasts into the new orbit.

    Umm, no.

    What you want to do is find the optimal use of the available thrust, which is to accellerate continously. The first half of the trip is increasing your velocity relative to your target, and the second half is decreasing velocity to match the target. If you have some other means of slowing down at the end, such as aerobraking or a chemical rocket for orbit insertion, you can spend more of the time speeding up.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  20. Theme song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    all together now...

    come sail away
    come sail away
    Come sail away with me

  21. Re:Wind gusts by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just toss out the space anchor.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  22. Re:IANARS by Chuck1318 · · Score: 4, Informative
    The problem is that at 1.3kw/m^2 (the power that reaches Earth), you're not going to go very fast

    It's much worse than that. Solar sails don't convert the energy of the light, they just receive momentum from the light as it bounces off. The momentum is equal to the energy of the light divided by the speed of light.

  23. Re:World's First? by snake_dad · · Score: 2, Informative

    This was not a solar powered craft, it was just a test launch using a less than impressive rocket, to test how the sail(s) would unfold in a space environment. A good test, a great project, but not a solar powered craft in any sense of the imagination.

    --
    karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
  24. Re:Wind gusts by jcr · · Score: 2, Informative

    well the real world is not full of optimal situations.

    Every interplanetary mission to date has been pretty damn close to optimal from an orbital-mechanics standpoint. It's too expensive to go, otherwise.

    be happy with creating an orbit with your sail and then furling them up.

    You furl them up when you get to your target.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  25. Private company? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    How does a private company get ahold of a submarine-launched ballistic missle? We could sure use one of these for our current... uh... project. Where can I get one?

    Osama Bin Laden

  26. Helpful by dg41 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Helpful if we ever have a whale-seeking probe come to our planet and we need to generate some quick power.

  27. Re:Wind gusts by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't forget that God looks like a few stars that light up when he talks.

    You really should stop sitting in front of Christmas trees while on acid.

  28. Re:Mars? by Fearless+Freep · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just attach a bungi chord to the earth on the way out...and snap back home

  29. Always under way. by argent · · Score: 2, Informative

    A solar sail has three forces acting on it. Gravity, pulling it towards the primary (planet or the sun), light, pushing it in the direction it aims the sail, and solar wind, pushing it away from the sun. How much you can balance these to "brake" (say, by tacking against solar orbit and moving back towards the sun) is still a matter of speculation.

    But the solar sail is *always* accelerating under these forces. If you get a "gust" you simply reduce sail for a while and adjust trim until you're back on the original course. Unlike a rocket, which has a fixed amount of acceleration and if it needs to change its course it can end up lost in space with no fuel, so long as the sail's intact making corrections is merely a matter of time.

  30. Re:Wind gusts by barawn · · Score: 2, Informative


    There are no breaks, but you CAN use it to manuver in any direction that is not 'up wind'.


    No.

    http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~diedrich/solarsails/i ntro/tacking.html

    Solar sails can tack, because slowing your orbital velocity moves you closer to the Sun. If you put the sail at an angle such that majority of the light pressure opposes your direction of motion, you will move inward.

    So to slow down, you just alter the angle of the sail. Easy enough.

  31. Re:IANARS by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How's that going to work with Orion? I can't imagine an M2P2 setup withstanding the force of a nuclear blast. Seems to me you've got to be pretty close to the propulsion unit to capture any decent fraction of its energy. It'd be like subjecting a soap bubble to a firecracker.

    1. You have to calculate the effective range. i.e. The pulse units must be exploded far enough back so that the pulse doesn't damage the craft.

    2. Orions aren't actually propelled by the explosion. The pulse units are sort of "shaped nuclear charges" where all the force is applied to a plate of propellant (tungsten, IIRC). The vaporized propellent collides with the pusher plate, resulting in thrust. The actual nuclear explosion itself would be far enough back not to impart much force on the craft.

    In an M2P2 Orion design, you simply choose a propellant that interacts positively with the shield, and adjust the charge to spread it evenly across the surface of said shield.

  32. well. yes, no.. by Fuzzums · · Score: 2, Informative

    My first thought was the same.

    My second thought said 'no'. This had something to do with the way the sails work.
    The wind blows against the sail and behind the sail a lower air-pressure (wing effect) pulls the boat forward. But there is also a pushing effect against the sail... So this was BS.

    But why does a sailboat sail into the wind? Resistance of the water. It's the shape of the boat, combined with the rudder combined with the resistance of the water that resolves in a forward force. This only works is the bost has enough speed or else it will drift away with the wind.

    Well, probably this isn't the whole story, but since the 'water' element lacks in space there is nothing to give the needed friction to sail against the solarwind.

    Or at least that's what I think.

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
    1. Re:well. yes, no.. by cephyn · · Score: 2, Informative

      right, but with a solar sail you can change the angle the sun hits, thereby changing the angle of direction of force. That means you can use it to turn, maybe even up to 90 degrees from the source. So you can do lateral movement.

      Now, you can also use a solar sail to slow down your orbital speed, meaning you will fall into the sun. So with combined left-right movement, alternately slowing down and speeding up orbital momentum, falling and then accelerating out, you could conceivably traverse the whole spectrum. And you could do it in three dimensions, moving into polar orbits etc.

      At least, I think.

      --
      Moo.
  33. Re:Mars? by Moofie · · Score: 2

    Dubya's "plan" is about as efficient as waiting for warp engines to be developed before going to Mars.

    There are better faster cheaper safer solutions than building Battlestar Galactica in orbit. Unfortunately, defense contractors don't get gigabucks for fielding practical solutions...they get gigabucks for fielding solutions that have subcontractors in every single congresscritter's district.

    Hell of a way to run a railroad.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  34. Good layman's discussion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...on the feasibility of solar sails can be found in one of Robert A. Heinlein's collections: "Expanded Universe."

    Solar sails delivering a 0.001G acceleration are feasible - and yes, you *want* constant acceleration, not kick and coast. At that lousy 1/1000G you get a round trip to Pluto in about 3.5 years. Of course that puts the asteroid belt much, much closer...

    3 1/2 years is the same time scale wind-powered ships were on in the 1600-1800's. It made the whole Earth accessible then. The solar sails can make the whole Solar system accessible. Moreover, those sails could be modified in place to - oh, let's say - boil off a bit of front end of a convenient asteroid, for convenient insertion into high-Earth orbit for refining and manafacturing.

    And it's a damn good way to use up those old boosters! Recycling rules!

    Best,
    Mal the Elder

  35. Previous failure, visibility by XNormal · · Score: 4, Informative

    These launchers do fail occasionally, just like any other launcher in the business. In fact, this specific type of launcher has failed on the previous attempt to launch a solar sail by the same group!

    ...it did fail us on July 20 when the 3rd stage motors failed to provide the necessary velocity change and the rocket computer shut overrode the command to separate the spacecraft from the booster...

    Yes, it will most likely be visible. You can see satellites every evening. The sail is bigger than the solar panels of most satellites.

    --
    Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
  36. Re:Wind gusts by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2, Informative
    The guy didn't chicken out when he got too high. His gun fell out of his lap. He actually did shoot some of his balloons. For reference:

    Snopes
    Link
    Wikipedia

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower