South Park Creators Have A New Film
Vince C writes "Trey Parker and Matt Stone are back to filmmaking again. No, it is not a South Park movie and no they are not acting. In fact, it is a totally different media... marionettes. Yep! Puppets folks. They are making Team America:World Police. If you liked the original Thunderbirds and hate the live action remake but also love comedy sticking it to our current government then you are going to love Matt and Trey's new project. Trailer and more info at the movie's site."
Yeah, I'd imagine those who are responsible on making sure no new terror attacks happen, are a bit touchy on the subject.
I'd be a bit more sympathetic if I thought the Bush administration actually gave a crap about anything other than getting re-elected and cutting taxes. I really do care about the War On Terror, which is why I'm not voting for Bush. (Of course, I'd feel better if Kerry showed some sign of caring too, but at least I don't think he'll go out of his way to start yet another war just for the hell of it.) You don't have to be a whiny leftist to despise Bush; I'd like nothing better than seeing Al Qaeda blown to pieces, but the current administration didn't have the balls to finish the job.
You cannot argue what Communism means from the policies of the Soviet Union, which was never Communist and never claimed to be.
Even if you're factually right you still cannot equate "in practice" to original intent. Your statement of "Communists want everything in the hands of one institution: the government" is equivalent to "Free speech advocates want barely legal girls to be seduced into making pornography" just because free speech in practice leads to pornography.
You tell me!
;))
And that's just for politics
Yesterday, big mistake, I brought forth constructive criticism about the Linux distro wolrd...
ouch
karma bonus droped right away and in no time my flamebait moderation had to be to good to me cause it got rated overrated, I mean...
I was THAT close to be banned
The reason Libertarians are more "attached" to Republicans is that there are several fiscally-conservative-socially-liberal members of the GOP.
:)
That more or less describes me.
There are only a couple of ProLife democrats, one tried to speak (PA govenor, I think?) at the 1996 DNC convention, and all hell broke loose among the delegates.
Also, I feel like I can vote Republican because I don't believe anything will change on the social issues anyway, and, they aren't nearly as important to me
--Joey
Who the fuck is moderating here?. I am giving you this post as an example of what offtopic means. It would be flamebait too if your stupid ass could post a response.
These things make me understand the importance of metamoderation.Also, government is getting larger all the time, all in the name of fighting terrorism.
I'm sick of both of them, that's why I want gridlock. If any one party controls it all, government grows like hell. So I'm waiting to see what happens when election day grows closer. If it looks like republicans will keep control of congress, I'll vote for Kerry. If it looks like Democrats will regain control, I'll vote for Bush.
Government works best when it's not working.