Slashdot Mirror


Am I a Spam Zombie?

ReallyCurious asks: "Recently, I've noticed a lot of junk email in my inbox reporting 'Mail delivery failure' or 'Undeliverable'. Some of these had documents attached, so I figured this was just a worm variant. But these messages keep coming. I worry that my machine has been turned into a 'Spam Zombie'. I don't see any suspicious processes running, but maybe it only runs for a few seconds, and at irregular times. I run a Windows 98 laptop, sometimes wirelessly connected to broadband (a few hours a day, on average), but I had to remove my virus software years ago because it was locking my system up, so I'm wide open. I've tried to be a good citizen and have been shopping for new virus software, but prices are running $40-$70, and most of these are just for upgrades (not even counting the mandatory 'subscriptions')! Is there an open or free virus fighting solution that's reliable and available for Windows? I'd be happy to run it ASAP."

160 comments

  1. Well... by hookedup · · Score: 4, Informative

    It may not be your system spewing out spam, but simply someone spoofing your domain.. happens to me every once in a while

    1. Re:Well... by hookedup · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get some coffee....here for it

    3. Re:Well... by tooth · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yeap, AVG does a good job. It's certainly better than nothing.

      Also try the no cost version of Zone Alarm.

      These are basic and no cost bits of software I run on my parents machines (and Firefox ;-) ... Though I'd love to buy them a mac one day :)

    4. Re:Well... by walt-sjc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. Email worms and spammers frequently forge the sender. The problem is clueless mail adminitrators that configure their mail relays to accept mail to anyone (even unknown users) and then generate a bounce message when it can't be delivered (user unknown...) All scanning (spam and AV) and user verification really needs to be performed at initial SMTP reception and not after the fact.

      Unfortunately, older versions of Exchange are stupid in this respect, and accept pretty much anything. I believe you even have to specifically configure the newer versions of exchange too to behave correctly (someone correct me if I'm wrong here... I no longer use exchange, just read about how 2003 works...)

      IMHO, if you are running an older version of exchange without a good Unix relay in front of it that can do all this validation and scanning for you, you are a big part of the problem.

    5. Re:Well... by Domini · · Score: 1

      Yup, this is just spoofing... don't give it a second thought.

      Most probably some virus/worm somewhere.

      I just got a bounce message today where I allegedly sent a message to someone that bounced. Strange thing it was sent from a dormant e-mail of mine which is not configured anywhere in any of my local programs and only an old 'official' contact on the web. (A mail alias on my domain...)

      So I would not worry.

      I'm running this XP box, with SP 4 (Using Kerio Personal Firewall 2.1.5 instead of windows's one) as well as having the lates updated Norton Internet security running and scanning all my outgoing mail for me. The I have also bought AdAware SE, and I KNOW I'm clean. (And My other boxes are Apple and Linux... and not configured for mail...)

      And, Oh please, don't post any more queries until you have a Real OS installed.

    6. Re:Well... by SiliconJesus · · Score: 1

      Agreed - I've been running it at home for about a year and a half. AVG is a good AV with regular updates. Don't forget to update often.

      --
      Clinton made me a Republican. Bush made me a Libertarian. Trump is making me question reality.
    7. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      usually real undeliverable messages include a lot of information and not just a subject, a short body and an infected attachement.

      It is most likely another system that is infected and spoofed the "to" and "from" addresses.

      here is an example of body of a real delivery failure:

      Failed to deliver to 'prova2341241233@domain'
      SMTP module(domain blabla.domain) reports:
      host mailhost.somedomain says:
      550 5.1.1 ... User unknown

      Reporting-MTA: dns; domain

      Original-Recipient: rfc822;
      Final-Recipient: rfc822;
      Action: failed
      Status: 5.0.0

      Received: from [192.168.1.1] (HELO [192.168.2.1])
      by domain
      with ESMTP id 0300320 for prova2341241233@domain; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 14:09:21 +0200
      Message-ID:
      Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 14:09:24 +0200
      From: me
      User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803
      X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, ja
      MIME-Version: 1.0
      To: prova2341241233@domain
      Subject: dsf
      Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
      Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    8. Re:Well... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Yup, this is just spoofing... don't give it a second thought.

      I would give it a second thought, it is likley someone you have had an email corispondence with and can therfore warn.

      The best bet is to find out what virus it is (scan the email). And tracert the originating IP address. this should give you the ISP and maybe a state. Look up the virus to find the file names it creates and tell your family/friends that match the ISP/location to search for the file.

      Most Virii can be removed by deleting a registry key rebooting, killing one file.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    9. Re:Well... by kyhwana · · Score: 1

      SP4 for XP? WOW!
      Are you from the future? ;)

      --
      My email addy? should be easy enough.
    10. Re:Well... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      The license is a little bit weird though. 2. You may install and use only one copy of the Software for single home or non-commercial organization computer protection only, irrespective of the number of times you download the Software or the number of licenses you purport to accept. 3. You may not use the Software on a network or more than one PC. If your house has more than one computer, I guess you're out of luck. Also, they don't define network, but the internet is a network, and somehow I don't think they really mean that you can't use it on your internet connected computer. It's be practically useless otherwise. Anybody got an opinion on whether or not sneakernet is actually a network?

    11. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      As he said, the email address is inactive, but is displayed on the web. Spammers don't just look on the web for email address to spam, but also address to spoof spam from. The only connection he had with the spammer was an http connection for 1/2 a second.

    12. Re:Well... by Idealius · · Score: 2, Informative

      The story submitter is worried about his machine, not someone elses and if he wants to be sure he has no spyware on his system he should use HijackThis by Merjin:

      http://www.spywareinfo.com/~merijn/ (official site, down ATM)

      http://www.tomcoyote.org/hjt/

      Many popular anti-spyware forums accept posting a HijackThis log their HijackThis expert members can examine and advise you on. (e.g. The LavaSoft AdAware forums allow this but they require you post an AdAware log first :)

      Anyway, HijackThis is fairly manual as far as you need to know what you're doing to use it properly. However, if spyware is on your system it will be in a HijackThis scan result as it shows your computer's startup programs/services (legitimate or otherwise) in all known places they exist on your computer.

      Also, removing persistent spyware can get complicated using anything and this applies to HijackThis, too.

      I suggest you use Process Explorer to aid you if you're ever in this situation:

      http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/freeware/proce xp .shtml

      The common approach for persistent spyware is to have 3+ processes running on your system, one that actually performs the spyware function and the other two which monitor the spyware process and each other. With Process Explorer You can susped processes that monitor other dummy processes that all make sure you A. Don't remove their startup entries and B. Don't try and terminate the spyware's running processes. They don't monitor whether their buddies are suspended, though so you can just suspend all of them after you've identified them, end them all, then remove the HijackThis entries now that the spyware startup entries aren't protected anymore. :)

      There's also the 'Find Handle' feature which can be useful as some old methods of startup can run processes so they are a subset of Explorer rather than a seperate process name in Task Manager > Processes tab. This is also a good way to find spyware DLL's.

      Anyway, as a technician, that's what I would do. Learning HijackThis and Process Explorer allow you to tune up a computer like you would a car.

    13. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the worse Ask Slashdot ever. Good god... now the "news for nerds, stuff that matters" has turned into "tech help for the completely incapable newbies"?

    14. Re:Well... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Your right, I was looking at it as a virus email receiving problem and not a spam one.

      With a little bit of thought, someone without a large web presance can find out who is the infected computer sending them virus email relativly easily.

      Spam zombies tend to be people you don't know though.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    15. Re:Well... by Wingit · · Score: 1

      Good recommendation on running a Real OS Domini, but you are running XP SP4? I am impressed. You are not just running a real OS, but actually running a future OS. Kudos!

      --
      We win together or suffer without.
    16. Re:Well... by sheddd · · Score: 3, Informative
      Instructions on how to do recipient filtering w/exchange:

      Here and here

      (btw filtering is off by default)

    17. Re:Well... by stevesliva · · Score: 1

      Yup, if you use your undisguised hotmail address on every one of your slashdot postings-- hypothetically, of course--you will see many bounce notices that dutifully land in your hotmail junk mail folder, using up your meager 2MB quota 40KB at a time.

      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    18. Re:Well... by Marillion · · Score: 1

      I think that someone is spoofing a delivery failure email because the body is almost always a virus of somekind. Perhaps the spoofer is thinking that a delivery failure will make it past Bayesian filters.

      --
      This is a boring sig
    19. Re:Well... by Bri3D · · Score: 1

      Not your domain, but your Email address. SMTP simply places email addresses in the header From: field. Anyone can send an email "from" whatever they want.

      Don't worry about you being a spambot, I've even seen these messages hit mailing lists :-).

    20. Re:Well... by Domini · · Score: 1

      Thanks! :)

    21. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Amendments 9, 10 and 14th amendments... Read them!
      This sig brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Department.
    22. Re:Well... by Pandora's+Vox · · Score: 1

      as much as i dislike that email service, the pedant in me feels the need to clarify that mail in your junk folder does not count towards your quota.

      -Leigh

    23. Re:Well... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Isn't this how the RFC states mail servers *should* behave? It may not be the correct behavior anymore, but you can't blame ms for following the standards (for once)

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    24. Re:Well... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      How do you know your machine isn't infected with something none of the anti spyware programs detect yet? It is trivial for a spyware author to recompile his program and change some of the strings around so that it's no longer detected by antivirus software, or even compress it with a new/modified executeable packer. Remember malware has to be released to the wild and actually infect a rather large number of people before the antivirus/spyware authors will get hold of a copy, analyse it and include a signature, you could be one of the first infections of a new piece of malware.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    25. Re:Well... by Domini · · Score: 1

      Because I have a firewall (NON-XP-SP2) and a Linux gateway with another firewall and packet sniffers... I would see the traffic.

      Sure one could get polymorphic virii, and do all sorta funny stuff. But mostly their memory footprint (or key parts thereof) remain the same or similar to existing virii and spyware. Good Virii and spyware detection software can detect derivatives even before they were programmed to.

      But this is irrelevant, as it's a network issue.

    26. Re:Well... by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      SP4 for XP? WOW!
      Are you from the future? ;)
      ... aka mandrake 16 or suse 14.2, (2009, when Microsoft abandons their "services for unix", fires all their coders, and sells a rebranded linux :-)
    27. Re:Well... by 9-bits.tk · · Score: 1

      Or try ClamWin AV.

  2. Not necessarily by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

    Most of those are forged to look like bounces.

    --
    You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    1. Re:Not necessarily by legirons · · Score: 1

      "Often when I've received such bounces, when the originator can be identified, they refuse to help in providing a copy of the original email, headers... to backup the allegation that they're bouncing messages from me. "

      Just a thought, but how do you know the bounce came from them? Following the same line of reasoning, someone could be forging an email claiming to be from a clueless virus-scanner, disguised as a bounce in response to someone who forged an email?

      The only reasonable answer is to reply with someone else's name in the from field to the alleged autoreponder about the alleged spammer, so that you start a whole new conversation betweeen two machines completely unrelated to any of the previous accusations...

    2. Re:Not necessarily by renehollan · · Score: 1
      Of course, the From: header can be spoofed!

      I'm not talking about any of the email headers. I'm talking about the actual IP address of the email filter that contacted my SMTP server with the bogus bounce: it, unfortunately, trusted the From: address.

      Now, this could come from a zombie, or an SMTP proxy, but in either case, there exists a party that can be held responsible

      --
      You could've hired me.
  3. No by sa3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The bounces you're getting are from other spam using you as the From address. Spam sent from your machine would have random addresses not necessarily your own. But you might still have a trojan running that could be used to send spam so you should check.

  4. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What makes you think you're going to get delivery failures for outgoing spam? If you're a spam zombie, I doubt it is going out with your email in the from: field.

  5. eh by doofusclam · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why not run a free firewall and watch for any alerts that something is trying to connect to the internet? Zonealarm will do fine.

    If you're a bit more techie you can use winpcap or similar to capture the traffic.

    There's no excuse to be wide open. You'll soon do something about it when your ISP wakes up to the problem and cuts you off. I appreciate how people can get caught inadvertantly by malware (I was hosting a trojan for a few hours last week inbetween upgrades) but I don't appreciate you leaving it this long, then asking slashdot when it's plainly obvious what you need to do.

    Cheers.

    1. Re:eh by oKtosiTe · · Score: 1

      He's not the one infected, and thus shouldn't have anything blamed on him.

    2. Re:eh by doofusclam · · Score: 1

      But they've stated they're running an insecure and unsupported OS without any protection. That's asking for trouble and bad netiquette (horrible word...)

      It won't take an hour to at least load up Zonealarm, Ad-Aware, Spybot and run a free virus check on www.ravantivirus.com, so there's no excuse.

  6. You're not infected by oKtosiTe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been having the same, and I know for a fact I'm not infected. This is just another worm.

  7. You should be fine. by FrenZon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most likely your email address is getting used as the return address and little more - the returned mail thing affects everyone to some degree. If you were being used as a spam zombie, you'd probably not notice any change in returned mails, as the zombies generally use someone else's address again as the return addy. I'm fairly sure the return addresses aren't always randomised, as on my domains I see a bucketload of spam all from the same email address, so whoever lives there must be getting a bucketful of bounces.

    Still, you really should get an antivirus solution to ease your worries. I use AVG from Grisoft, which is available in a free edition.

    Of course, the bounces are plain annoying - when I get ACTUAL bounces from mail I send, I often delete them based on subject line, not realising that the person I was trying to contact is none the wiser. Booo

    1. Re:You should be fine. by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1
      My e-mail address keebler@mindspring.com, has been around since 1994, and very often used unobscured during those early years. It is quite well known to spammers and is often used as a forged header. My father recently recieved an ActiveX virus sent using my address in the "From:" field. He was suspicious, as I know how to spell and form sentences like a native English speaker, and don't send him attachments other than amusing .jpegs

      But I'm scared of my more technically naive mother getting zapped this way, so I will probably have to retire that address. I resent that very much.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
  8. ultimate firewall by cuiousyellow · · Score: 3, Funny

    The poster sounds like a good candidate for MJR's ultimately secure firewall.

    Try Zonealarm?

    1. Re:ultimate firewall by silverfuck · · Score: 1
      The poster sounds like a good candidate for MJR's ultimately secure firewall.

      The poster is "wirelessly connected", you dolt! ;-)

      Try Zonealarm?

      That's more like it. Or better yet, Kerio Personal Firewall.

      --
      You know you've been IMing too long when you almost say 'lol' out loud to a non-geeky friend...
  9. OMG by cL0h · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're running Windows 98 with no virus software. I'm surprised you can use the machine at all. I constantly get requests from people to clean up their Win98 machines. They are usually riddled with spyware, trojans and diallers. Don't bother with new antivirus. Get a new operating system.

    --
    cL0h
    1. Re:OMG by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      Indeed. Running Win98 is just asking for trouble.

      OK, I realise not everybody is savvy enough to set up, or want to set up, any kind of *nix alternative (Macs included) but if he wishes to pursue proprietary solutions, he should at least consider more recent offerings from MS than excreta from six years ago.

    2. Re:OMG by Reene · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For a long time (5+ years) I ran Windows 98 because I couldn't get online under any other operating system (and I tried a lot of them) and couldn't afford a $60 dialup modem that would allow me to do so.

      For a large part of that time I ran no firewall, used an online remote virus scanner sporadically at best, and reinstalled only once. In all that time, my computer contracted only one virus (a non-serious one at that), and this was due to a less computer-savvy relation of mine browsing the internet using Internet Explorer while I was out of the house and unable to show her how to use Mozilla.

      So what is my motivation to say all this? There is a point that justified bias crosses the line into unjustified bias. Going online in Windows 98 without iron-clad virus protection and 3 firewalls does not guarantee the crippling of your computer to the point of being unable to use it if you know what you are doing. Now, undoubtedly the rules change when it comes to your "average" user, but even then it takes a relatively small tutorial in what not to do to keep them rather safe. I know this because it took me about 10 minutes to teach my 63 year old grandmother the basic (and most important) rules of going online without getting viruses or malicious dialers and the like and a friendly reminder every now and then when she forgets or gets confused.

      Of course now I use SuSE and I worry even less about that sort of thing now. I'm tempted to go back to using my Windows 98 partition to be honest, because I can't for the life of me get my HP scanner working (and as a quasi-professional artist this is a Bad Thing) and I've had several problems with keeping dialup working. Problems that I needless to say do not have in Windows.

      --
      "He does look a bit Oompa like, even if his Loompa is a bit off-kilter."
    3. Re:OMG by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
      You're running Windows 98 with no virus software. I'm surprised you can use the machine at all.
      I run MS Windows 95 with no anitvirus or firewall, and don't have any problem at all with viruses, etc.
      All I did was turn off everything that can be used to compromise my machine (e.g., closed port 135, turned off NetBIOS over TCP/IP, etc.).
      I also have disabled scripting, plugins, etc., in my browser (Mozilla) and in my mail and news readers (Outlook Express, Mozilla and Forte Free Agent).
      (I do have a proxy server running (JunkBuster), but that's mainly to block cookies, banner ads, and annoying sig pics on some forums (not to mention goatse.cx and tubgirl).)
      I'd like to surf the net using Linux, but I can't get the modem working under Slackware.
      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    4. Re:OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you retarded. Win98 works just fine. No need to upgrade to lastest peice of crap XP Home or XP Pro.

    5. Re:OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have basically the same set up (plus proxomitron instead of junkbuster) and no probs. Once in while I get some bounce messages, but they always come in bunches. Also, they never affect my pop3 accounts, only my yahoo account. I know my 'problem' is spoofing and not being zombified. WIN95 is not the problem; indeed, I am much more comfortable with a win95box that I know is not always dialing home than I would be with an xpbox that is ...

  10. maybe... by johnjones · · Score: 4, Informative

    ok if you run windows you need a virus checker

    are you a home user ?
    if so

    http://free.grisoft.com/freeweb.php/doc/2/

    and get avg for free
    Now you need a firewall

    http://www.free-firewall.org/

    then I would advice get rid of spyware with spybot
    donate something to the project if you like it...

    http://www.safer-networking.org/en/download/


    regards

    John Jones

    1. Re:maybe... by �berhund · · Score: 1

      I'll second the motion for AVG anti-virus.

      --
      -Uberhund
    2. Re:maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All in favor...

  11. maybe not. by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Informative

    but if you're running a win98 without firewalling/serious tweaking.. ..you're probably owned or at least at risk. though in all fairness they're probably some other spammers who just happen to use your mail add as the sender.

    go with FREE solutions, they exist.

    http://www.free-av.com/ free virus scanning

    http://www.free-firewall.org/ some free firewalling

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:maybe not. by mbourgon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why is he owned if he uses 98? My impression has been that 98 is _safer_ - WinNT/2k/XP all have all these fun services that can be exploited, where 98 doesn't. Granted, if you run IE or the like all bets are off.

      Or is there something I'm missing?

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  12. AVG AntiVirus by Green+Light · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here is the link to their free version This works well, and is completely free for personal use.

    --
    "Send an Instant Karma to me" - Yes
  13. AVAST by chadkiser · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:AVAST by doofsmack · · Score: 1

      I use AVAST, it's great. Recommended.

    2. Re:AVAST by bob65 · · Score: 1

      I found AVAST to use much more resources than AVG, however.

  14. We get the same thing all the time... by Anti_Climax · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We get bounces to the support address at the company I work at all the time. Someone has decided to use our support address as the 'from:' address in their crappy spam. Anytime they send it to a non-existant address, we get the bounce. Our system is updated and locked down, so they aren't coming from us, but YMMV.

    Either way, I'd suggest running that address through a spam block of some kind to filter out the crud or just give it up entirely if you can.

    --
    Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
  15. Yes by noselasd · · Score: 2, Informative

    antivir seems to work ok,
    and is updated afaik.
    Spyware removal software is obligatory on windwos as well.

    1. Re:Yes by Oncogene · · Score: 1

      Shoot, you just beat me to it. Curses! Foiled again!

      Antivir has saved my computer in the past, and I would have no problems relying on it in the future. They update about as often as Symantec releases updates, which is impressive (and consoling).

      --

      - - - - - - -
      "All hail the glory of the Hypnotoad."
  16. Re:Another stupid ask slashdot by feidaykin · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Elitist attitudes like this are always amusing to me... Requests for this guy to search google don't answer his question... He wants to know what we, a group of tech savvy folk, recommend. It's harder for google to answer that directly than a simple ask slashdot. To all the moaners out there, stop reading Ask Slashdot or just stop reading the site alltogether. Questions like these are how people learn, and serve as starting point for disscusion here.

    We should never insult folks for asking "stupid" questions, but rather admire the courage it took to ask.

    --

    "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

  17. I don't get it.... by Apreche · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OK. I'm a dual booting guy. Obviously my linux, which I use mostly, has no problems. However, my windows install also has no problems. I only got a virus once ever because after a clean XP install a worm got to me before I got to windowsupdate.

    The point is that you do NOT need anti-virus software. Anti-virus anti-spyware software should be used only to cleanup already busted systems. Your system cannot be infected if you take proper care to prevent it. Even if you are running windows on a cable modem all day.

    1) NEVER download an e-mail attachment.
    2) Use Firefox instead of IE.
    3) Use Thunderbird instead of Outlook
    4) Do NOT visit untrustworthy websites
    5) Do NOT download any software from the internet and install it. Even if it looks trusty from tucows or download.com do a google search to see if it it spyware first.
    6) Have a firewall like zone alarm or sygate, or better have another computer between you and the net with a firewall on it. Or have a hardware firewall. Proper network level security keeps the worms out almost guaranteed.
    7) If you have wireless lock it down. You don't want a drive by person to start sending spam out your pipe.
    8) DO get all the windows updates that are security fixes. The ones that aren't security fixes you can choose to get or not get at your own discretion.

    If you do those things then there is almost no way you can get hit. It's really that simple. And if you DO get hit, its usually easier to re-install due to the degrading nature of windows. Any windows install, even a clean one, falls apart over time. The registry fills with more and more junk. Improperly uninstalled apps leave files behind here and there. Hidden variables change and are not changed back. Even the cleanest installs seem to last at most 18 to 24 months except in very controlled business environments.

    Dont pay for anti-virus software, its a ripoff. Just re-install and then take proper preventative measures so it doesn't happen again.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:I don't get it.... by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      If I might amend that a little because they are all good points but missing something:

      0) Do not run Windows 98. This is the year 2004. 1998 was released 6 years ago. Microsoft have released three (3!) major desktop operating system revisions since then. If you thought MS was bad for security now, try and remember what they were like 6 years ago!

      If you won't pay for Windows XP, I am certain that you can get a free operating system that will do all the things you can do with your Windows 98 install. You've managed to make it to "Ask Slashdot" once, I am sure someone here knows of some kind of free OS you can use.

      There are some benefits to A/V software, especially because the system is a laptop and therefore may plug directly into a foreign network and therefore be exposed to all manner of nasties. As mentioned many times before, AVG is free, not a ripoff, and very good quality software.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    2. Re:I don't get it.... by R2.0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Microsoft have released three (3!) major desktop operating system revisions since then"

      Windows ME: Oh, it was major, alright - a major failure. The "Upgrade" path at the time was to revert Back to 98SE.

      Windows 2000: Remember, this was marketed as "not for home use". That was what ME was for. 2000 wouldn't support many legacy apps.

      So there has really only been 1 major desktop OS revision that is relevant, and given XP's poor rep, there are plenty of reasons not to upgrade.

      Also, the comparison between then and now isn't valid. A large number of the exploits now target services in 2000 & XP that 98 doesn't have.

      98 certainly isn't state of the art, but I don't know that I'd call 2000 or XP that either. Your most compelling argument seems to be "98 is OLD!!"

      BFD.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    3. Re:I don't get it.... by Godeke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Insufficient. If you hook Windows directly up to broadband to get WindowsUpdate running, you have a good chance of being infected before you are patched. Software firewalls don't block everything, so Step 6 is insufficient, unless you have a machine proxying, NATting firewall or a true firewall. Even then you put a vulnerable machine on your local network, which may have unpleasant surprises in store for you.

      A better option is for step 8 becomes: get all windows updates and security fixes ON CD, because otherwise you expose your machine prior lockdown. Likewise, turn off unneeded services (you don't need to be sharing files and printers, why the heck would you leave the SMB server running?) prior to connecting to a network.

      Yet, even with all that you end up with the problem of vulnerabilities that are not patched prior to the exploit being generally available. Yes, using alternate programs and avoiding untrustworthy websties sounds good, until you make a typo and end up at an untrustworthy site by accident. (Or shall we decree the typo a death penalty offense). I recently saw a typo site trying to exploit the Firefox 1.9.2 vulnerability to install adware (which didn't work since I was on Linux as I am right now, but they tried...)

      In the end, perhaps having a virus scanner in memory to detect things that get through all your other work might be wise. Otherwise that high and mighty "almost no way you can get hit" will bite you back when the almost part comes true and you don't even know it happened. Remember: security is about defense in depth and a big ego provides little depth.

      I personally don't care for anti-virus software (it is a little late in the cycle for my taste), but to avoid using it on the corporate networks I care for would be gross negligence on my part, opening me up to potential legal liability. Suddenly $22 a machine a year looks pretty good, even as I take all the other steps to avoid needing it in the first place.

      --
      Sig under construction since 1998.
    4. Re:I don't get it.... by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately Firefox isn't the cure-all for avoiding web viruses. I haven't had a virus on a machine for years, but just last week a site somehow opened Internet Explorer from Firefox and thus installed some dialers and crap.

    5. Re:I don't get it.... by IvoryRing · · Score: 1

      While I agree that carefull, aware, regularly updated wetware can avoid most of the bad problems, I have to take issue with a few of your points (understand this isn't to nitpick just to nitpick, but to point out that absolutes like this aren't realistic):

      1) While you may be happy using email strictly as a n ASCII text communications method, many people are not. Specifically, for Average NonTechie Joe to Average Techie Joe, an email attachment is simply the easiest way to get a file from A to B anywhere further than across the office. While it is true that 'never download an email attachment' can be useful as a method of blocking certain infection vectors, the fact is that for many people, this is equivalent to 'fundamentally break email'.

      2) While I agree that almost anything would be better than IE, if you really want to go whole hog and avoid the chance of infection, don't you think lynx is better than Firefox? Seriously, I'd phrase this bit simply as 'anything other than IE is better than IE from the standpoint of avoiding infections'.

      3) There are many MUAs, and the situation is similar to above - nearly anything is better then Outlook/OutlookExpress. Ideally using an MUA that has no scripting available anywhere as an option would be even better - note that from an infection standpoint, I'd say Pine may be a better choice thank Thunderbird for this reason.

      4) Aside from a website that I've created, and the website for my OS vendor (they already own me anyway) and my browser vendor (they already own me anyway), how do I determine that a site is untrustworthy (or the reverse - trustworthy, hence safe to visit) BEFORE I visit it? Honest answer: you can't.

      5) So I'll be ordering the Foxfire/Thunderbird/Mozilla CD online using what? IE? And of course I'll never download anything from windowsupdate.microsoft.com. I'm sure you don't mean that only Tucows and download.com can have suspect software, right?

      6) And in order to compare zone alarm and sygate I'll buy both via phone or BestBuy and test them out and then just throw away the one I don't use. I've really got to take exception to your last bit on this item - the concept that network level security will keep you safe from infection (NOT what you stated, but what Average NonTech Joe could easily infer from what you did state), is exactly the kind of attitude I have to fight nearly every week at work. Proper network level security does indeed close ONE of many possible vectors for infection. Unfortunately when you say 'guaranteed' some non-trivial portion of the non-techs out there are going to think 'Ok, I can relax now and do whatever I want'. Realistically, for the Average NonTech Joe, I'd just go with the hardware firewall/router/accesscontrol/etc [almost none of them are technically firewalls, even though many of us use that term].

      7) Easier said than done. While this is certainly critical to do, and when done right can be transparent, the last time I did this for someone (6 months ago) it was decidedly in the category of 'easy if you know how, but way too easy for a non-tech to break everything during the process'.

      8) Aside from the contradiction with #5 (unless you really think a MSDN subscription is appropriate for home users, or that home users are really going to order patches on CD from MS), there can be landmines here (recentish examples: EULA changes, new vectors opened up by the use of newer versions of Windows Media Player, patches that break your system -- not rampant problems, but they do crop up from time to time) . At some level, for the Average NonTech Joe, the simplest practical approach is to just install everything from windowsupdate and cross your fingers that you don't get burned. There isn't a trivial way to know when it is safe to install windowsupdate patches and when it isn't; and mostly the security patches do more good than harm. The hard part is that not everything that says 'Security Patch' really is limited to just that, and not everything that doesn't say 'Security Patch'

    6. Re:I don't get it.... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      That's like saying that you don't need to use condoms as long as you know you're having sex with people who are safe.

      It's a true statement, but unless you're in a long term monogamous relationship and she's on the pill, it doesn't apply to you.

      The internet is like a sleazy singles bar, there is bad stuff out there. If you're connected to the internet, it's a good idea to use AV software.

      If you think it's a ripoff, get a free one like Avast or AVG.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    7. Re:I don't get it.... by NewStarRising · · Score: 1

      1) NEVER download an e-mail attachment. #Loose a lot of funcionality of email - reduced to pure text. 2) Use Firefox instead of IE. #Good Call 3) Use Thunderbird instead of Outlook #Again, Good 4) Do NOT visit untrustworthy websites #Do you have a list of which sites are trustworthy/untrusted for me please? 5) Do NOT download any software from the internet and install it. #Does this include software/updates from windowsupdate.microsoft.com? #Drivers for my hardware? #Anti-Virus/anti-Spyware? 6) Have a firewall like zone alarm or sygate, or better have another computer between you and the net with a firewall on it. Or have a hardware firewall. Proper network level security keeps the worms out almost guaranteed. #A router with firewall works wonders. 7) If you have wireless lock it down. You don't want a drive by person to start sending spam out your pipe. #Good advice, in general - Lock Down your Wireless. 8) DO get all the windows updates that are security fixes. The ones that aren't security fixes you can choose to get or not get at your own discretion. #But you told me not to download software from the net. And not to go to untrusted sites.

      --
      b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
      MadDwarf
  18. Free virus software is out there. by ScepticOne · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.clamwin.net/ is an allegedly good antivirus program.

    Also, http://www.spybot.info/ has been alleged to be a good antispyware program.

  19. Most likely a 'Joe-Job'...Ask your ISP about SPF by rthille · · Score: 5, Informative

    Since the SMTP protocol doesn't have any authentication of the sender (except within an ISP/Domain with SMTP-AUTH), it's easy for a spammer/virus to send mail pretending to be you. That's called a 'joe-job' after one of the early occurrences of it.
    A recently proposed solution (though not without it's problems) is SPF (Sender Policy Framework) http://spf.pobox.com/ where a domain owner can publish the list of servers which are authorized to send mail as being from a user of their domain.
    Until it's widely deployed, not just on the publishing side, but on the checking side, it won't be real useful. However it's nearly trivial for the DNS owner to publish the records and since big ISPs like AOL and Yahoo are starting to check them it does protect you from being Joe-Jobbed to a large number of mailboxes.

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  20. "Friends" by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    Most likely it just means you have a lot of dumb friends.

    To simplify; their systems get infected or hijacked and your e-mail address appears in their addressbooks so the trojan/virus abuses your email address.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  21. Amazing nobody has mentioned it by WSSA · · Score: 1

    These authentic looking bounce messages have attachments that you're going to open, right? Don't do it! That's the payload that delivers the trojan/worm.

  22. Question: Am I a spam zombie by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 0, Insightful
    Answer: You are running Windows98 unprotected.

    So...duh.

  23. Re:Another stupid ask slashdot by RealityMogul · · Score: 0

    Courage? It's posted from ReallyCurious, who doesn't have an e-mail address apparently, and who doesn't seem to have a Slashdot account. It's not exactly courageous to post a message anonymously.

    Aside from that, this discussion topic is really lame for Slashdot. This is a board, for techies, am I right? What's wrong with assuming that a member of this site should be capable of finding such simple answers somewhere else. Is this site going to become News for Nerds, Free Tech Support for everyone else?

  24. AVG by kyhwana · · Score: 1

    AVG works pretty well, i've found. I used it on all the machines that came in when I used to work at a computer shop and it caught pretty much all of them.

    I run it on my windows systems at home, too.
    So consider this as another vote for AVG. :)

    You should probably also consider a firewall, there are couple of free ones out there, including Zone Alarm and so on.

    --
    My email addy? should be easy enough.
  25. Housecall by jgaynor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Bah. Im suprised no one has mentioned housecall yet:

    http://housecall.antivirus.com

    Housecall is a web-based virus scanner that, since it is loaded anew every time, always has the latest virus definitions. Since it installs nothing but temporary cache files, you dont have to worry about it slowing down your machine.

    Because of the nature of the application it can't always clean the offending virii/malware, but it will at least alert you to their presence and give you their names so that you can manually remove them. When combined with stinger, spybot and google it's an excellent choice for on-site calls to machines without AV or for your old boxen that just cant afford the extra cycles for full-time AV bloat.

    If you prefer to do the offline thing, try the Knoppix anti-virus distribution (weak link I know). Once again it isn't a permanently installed application and since the OS isn't running it can slap down bugs before they're loaded into memory.

    Cheers!

    1. Re:Housecall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      (Posting AC so I don't undo my mods)

      I've used housecall a few times to scan some machines. I works pretty well, and since it's web based you don't have to install anything. The downside is that it's for IE only so it may not be an option for some (hopefully many).

      For offline scanning, I'll repeat the numerous recommendations for Grisoft's AVG free scanner
      http://www.grisoft.com/us/us_index.php
      A fter testing it on a few machines, were planning to purchase the server edition to scan all incoming email before it even hits the inbox.

  26. Re:Another stupid ask slashdot by marktwen0 · · Score: 1

    Whatever...I found the topic interesting, and the replies gave me useful information that I'll use to secure my gf's (and my) machines. Sorry if all regular slashdot readers aren't Uber-geeky enough to pass the coolness criterium. ;-) BTW, don't be put off by my high /. UID--I lost my first PW along the way, and don't know how to fix it. Oh, do you remember when Linux was still on comp.os.minix? I do.

  27. bottom line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, you aren't a spam relay. configure your smtp servers and domain names with spf and you will reduce but not end the spam being spoofed from your email address.

  28. You're an idiot. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    Bounce messages are completely non-indicative of spam zombie status. I would bet my entire life savings that his email address is in the list of fake address that various mailer worms or spam programs use as the fake "From:" header. Sometimes those lists are automagically pulled from internet searches. So that way he gets innundated with bounce messages, not the spammer.

    He probably just used his email address online once, or sent email to someone who's infected. Now his email address is seen as a good deflection target.

    I should know. I get tons of emails like this on various accounts that I've used on message boards or mailing lists.

    The one way to know if you're a zombie bot (without doing a scan for rogue software) is when you seem to be uploading a lot of data, or have lots of bursty system activity for no discernable reason.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:You're an idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

      And you're an asshole. You could have just explained in a non-offending tone that he was wrong, and why. But no, you had to directly offend him even in the subject header to your post like some pathetic teenage jock.

      Get the fuck out of here. We all hate people like you. No, I mean it. We hate you, all of us!

  29. With apologies for /.-ing them by dpilot · · Score: 1

    Most of the posts haven't really been answering the question. Most of the posts have been helpful advice about how to stop being a spam-zombie, but haven't been answering whether or not he currently is one.

    With apologies, because the connection I just made to them was a bit slow, there are:
    http://openrbl.org/
    http://moensted.dk/spam /
    http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ip4r.ch

    Unfortunately my domain is in there, because it really refers to my ISP-assigned IP, and their whole block is listed.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  30. Hint for installing Windows XP... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    This is really important for those of you who do a clean install of XP and don't want to get 0wn3d in the process:

    0) Prerequisites: XP Professional w/Corporate Volume License (you can actually derive this from an XP Home CD, a text editor and a CD Burner, exactly how this is done is left as an excercise for the reader)
    1) Install XP disconnected from the Internet. Use the CVL key to bypass the need to register XP on the internet.
    --- Alternatively, you can just do a phone registration without a standard retail XP... they're avaiable like 24-7.
    2) When you get to the point where they talk about network settings, make sure to go enable the Internet Connection Firewall on any adapters you have.
    3) Finish the installation, reboot.
    4) Double check in Network Connections that your adapters have that little lock on them.
    5) Put computer back on network/Connect to internet
    6) Run windows update.
    7) Reboot (if required)
    8) Return to step 6 (if required)
    9) Only at this point would you consider removing the ICF. But you don't have to unless you need to, or you get a better, 3rd party firewall to take it's place.

    Or just install XP Service Pack 2 slipstreamed. This will have ICF enabled by default (as it should be).

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:Hint for installing Windows XP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3rd party firewall to take it's place

      "its".

  31. Re:Another stupid ask slashdot by hoggoth · · Score: 1

    > gene therapy cocktail that will make your penis glow in the dark

    Ummmm, where can I get some of that? I think it would impress the ladies.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  32. Re:Another stupid ask slashdot by KingPrad · · Score: 1

    I agree. This one is an okay question. However that question from the guy who couldn't figure out how to block the light from an LED was outrageously stupid. A good proportion of these Ask Slashdot questions are rather dumb, so I can sympathize with this guy's response.

    --
    Stop the Slashdot Effect! Don't read the articles!
  33. Re:Another stupid ask slashdot by RealityMogul · · Score: 1

    I don't know when Linux was on comp.os.minix, so I can't very well tell you if I remember that time frame. Maybe it was back in the good ol' days when I was running my own BBS! BTW, geek pissing contests are always lame, but I win =P

  34. Almost right by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Except for the part about degradation of the registry. Look, I've got systems that are running Win 98SE and even 2 still running Win 95.

    One of the Win 95 machines has been running for 7 YEARS without having to reload the OS. I have swapped hardware in and out, and changed drivers. The last time the OS was changed was when I put the 6 Gig drive in (1997) and I needed to upgrade from Win 95 ver B to ver C (B didn't support drives that big).

    One of the Win 98 machines is now 4 years old, with no reloads, the other is only about 18 months old.

    I run them all now on a router with a hardware firewall. The 95 machine is hardwired, the 98's are Wi-fi. Cable modem coming out the other end. There is NO anti-virus software installed, though adaware still runs on them every so often. I did install all the patches from MS.

    Oh, and one more item of security for your Wi-fi system. Put passwords on your disk drives. You can teach all the other machines in your network to remember the passwords, but joe drive by can not access the drives if he breaks thru the first layer of security. Like anything else, he will go somewhere else where it is easier to get thru.

  35. A good firewall is as important as antivirus by ahrenritter · · Score: 1

    Everyone else already said you most likely aren't infected, but if your machine is totally unsecured, the first thing I'd recommend is getting a good software firewall installed and running. There are many different products out there with prices varying from free to darn expensive. I'll let someone else link to them for Karma. :)
    If you practice reasonably safe internet usage (e.g. not opening attachments you aren't expecting, not visiting websites from random links, not visiting shady websites) then your chances of catching a worm or virus drop to a comfortably low percentage if you have a solid firewall blocking all unnecessary incoming and outgoing traffic.

    From there you can find a reasonable free antivirus that you can run once a week or use it to examine any attachments that you do feel you need to open.

    --

    All I wanted was a rock to wind a piece of string around, and I ended up with the biggest ball of twine in Minnesota
  36. Look at the Received-From headers by kalidasa · · Score: 1

    If the originating ip address matches your ISP, there's a good chance, though as others here have said, most of the time, these bounces are from spam that uses one address from its mailing list for the "TO" header and another for the "FROM" header.

    NEVER run Windows without solid anti-virus. If something on your machine is interfering with the anti-virus, fix your machine until anti-virus runs. If your anti-virus interferes with something else, don't run that something else. Seriously. It's that dangerous. Being used for spamming is the least of your potential problems.

  37. You are being irresponsible by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 2, Informative

    You are doing nothing to stop your PC from being abused because you can't find free as in beer software?

    Adaware SE Personal www.lavasoft.de
    Zone Alarm Firewall www.zonelabs.com
    F-Prot Antivirus www.f-prot.com

    All commercial products free for personal use.

    Now, install those and stop the spammers, please.
    Keep your definitions updated, okay?

  38. Not necessarily by BadluckShleprock · · Score: 1

    Some trojans use the zombie's address book as a source for spoofed names. For example, let's say you e-mail George W. Bush a lot and president@whitehouse.gov is in your address book. You pick up a trojan somehow and it will find that address and use it as the "From" address when sending out the spam/virus. Bounce messages will go to president@whitehouse.gov.

    Are you feeling zombified?

    --


    ------
    There's a fine line between cuddling and holding someone down so they can't get away.
  39. Just some clarification by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    NEVER download an email attachment.
    Then how are you supposed to open it? People do send legitimate attachments.

    Do NOT visit untrustworthy sites
    What exactly is a trustworthy site these days? Javascript and even HTML have been used to download malicious code. Even well known and respected sites have been affected.

    Proper network level security keeps the worms out almost guaranteed.
    Worms yes, because they infect networks. But viruses and trojan horses infect machines.

    -Do beware of emails with single word subjects from people that you do not know.
    -Do beware of emails with double file extensions on their attachments i.e. .doc.pif
    -Do beware of malicious code that can spread via filesharing, instant messenging and IRC.
    -Turn off unnecessary services
    -Run as a restricted user if possible if you are using NT or a variant of NT such as Windows 2000 or XP.
    -A virus scanner is still recommended because it's better to be safe than sorry

  40. AntiVir by awerg · · Score: 1
    --
    -- Andy
  41. McAfee VirusScan 8.0 free or nearly free by lingorob · · Score: 1

    Right now Amazon, OfficeMax, CompUsa, Staples, Circuit City, and TigerDirect all have this commercial product for free or almost free. This is not uncommon. I actually just got a free upgrade to Norton from Outpost last week. I haven't tried the Grisoft free stuff.

  42. Not so idiotic by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1
    Windows (and other reasonably complex OSs) often get very busy for reasons difficult to discern. My old, crap laptop gets all but frozen when it starts swapping in earnest, or during dramatic GC sweeps. I've learned when to expect these, though.

    Also, my DSL modem has a "WAN" light, but nothing to say what's coming in vs going out. Turning logging on demonstrated that nearly all unaccountable activity was incoming probes, and I breathed easier. I also helped more than one sysadmin/netadmin identify zombies on their own networks, but it took some learnin' to see what probes were harmless vs those that were malicious. You're absolutely right about bounce messages---a brief "View Sources" against the headers, particularly the Received-From header, usually shows their origin being very far away from me.

    --
    This is not my sandwich.
  43. Cheap anti-virus software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A good way to get cheap anti-virus software is to buy LAST YEAR'S version from eBay. I recently bought Norton Systemworks 2003 (which includes Norton Antivirus) from eBay for $10 (including shipping). It was the real deal, not some pirated or used version. The software comes with one year of free virus updates. Since virus updates cost more than $10 per year, I think I'll just buy the 2004 version next year to get another year of free updates. Make sure you buy from a reputable dealer since there are a lot of pirated copies floating around, and who knows if they haven't been pre-infected before you buy!

    If you don't have or use a firewall already, you need one for sure. The one built into WinXP SP2 is decent. You should also be running anti-spyware software like Spybot and Ad-Aware. Also turn on automatic updates so you will always have the lastest OS patches. And switching to Mozilla instead of using IE is a great idea for security.

    The five pillars of Windows PC security (for home users) are firewall, antivirus, removing spyware, automatic updates, and Mozilla. Do those five things, and your computer is likely to be very secure. Or at least someone else's computer will be a more appealing target!

    If you find your computer is infected with many pieces of spyware and viruses, you may be better off just formatting your drive and reinstalling everything. Sometimes it's the only way to get all that junk off there.

    1. Re:Cheap anti-virus software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the best way to get cheap anti-virus software is to get free anti-virus software. There are many, many links provided throughout this discussion.

  44. qmail as well by devphil · · Score: 1


    ("Frequently"? They always forge the sender. Anyhow...)

    I really like qmail, but it does make the braindead design of accepting mail, then processing it. (For reasons of efficiency or something; it's supposed to be a feature.)

    The folks at LinuxMagic make a replacement that's a bitch to get working, but does all kinds of checking during the SMTP transaction, like valid user checking, virus scanning, etc. You're supposed to be able to plug in arbitrary checkers, but I never got around to trying. The valid-user checking alone is worth it. (They have a funny logo, too.)

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:qmail as well by brunson · · Score: 1

      Postfix has a load of builtin capabilities to do RBL and RHSRBL checks and other cool stuff before accepting a mail message.

      Check it out.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      Jesus loves you, I think you suck
    2. Re:qmail as well by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      It's possible to reconfigure qmail, atleast i used a hacked up qmail-scanner that rejects spam or virus content.. I want to make it reject invalid users too, but that's hard to do on the secondary mailservers that don't know which accounts exist on the primary server, and most spams are relayed through the secondaries.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  45. Answer, as always, is Google. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 0

    http://www.google.com/search?q=free+virus+scanner& sourceid=firefox&start=0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

    Holy christ, use Google first. Criminy. These questions get dumbver every day.

  46. Re:Another stupid ask slashdot by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    There's a difference between:

    "Are there any free virus scanners?"

    And:

    "Which free virus scanners do you recommend?"

    If this guy had spent even 5 seconds on Google, he'd KNOW there are free virus scanners for Windows all over the place. The first entire page of results for "free virus scanner" are all free virus scanners for Windows.

    This guy just didn't put in any effort at all.

    For the record, I recommend AVG Antivirus and Sygate Personal Firewall. ZoneAlarm might look pretty, but it's hard to configure and has some incompatibilities.

  47. No anti-virus software? Then stay off the net! by fmaxwell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I run a Windows 98 laptop, sometimes wirelessly connected to broadband (a few hours a day, on average), but I had to remove my virus software years ago because it was locking my system up, so I'm wide open. I've tried to be a good citizen and have been shopping for new virus software, but prices are running $40-$70, and most of these are just for upgrades (not even counting the mandatory 'subscriptions')!

    If you have a Windows 98 machine with no anti-virus software, then stay off of the Internet. Period. You have no right to endanger and inconvenience others just because you're too cheap/poor to buy anti-virus software and too computer-illiterate to type "free antivirus software" into Google (hint).

    It reminds me of someone with 20/200 vision operating a car without glasses because glasses cost too much. "Oops! Sorry about your poodle! Didn't mean to run over your kid; sorry. Uh oh, hit another parked car."

  48. Another option: by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    He could try simply deleting Lookout! Express and replacing it with some less vulnerable mail client. The majority of the viruses I've seen involve that horrible package in one way or another, and ditching it removes at least part of the problem.

  49. Not necessarily by renehollan · · Score: 3, Informative
    While running Win98 naked is about as wise as, well, running naked, this may not be the source of those bounce messages. IOW, by themselves they do not indicate that your box is a spam zombie.

    I get boatloads of these things, as well as spam (filtering is your friend) -- my email address is fairly public and in a lot of address books. I'm not about to abandon it as it's within a domain I lease.

    I run behind a fairly hardened firewall, and am moving towared a Linux iptables-based firewall/router/home server.

    What ticks me off is when such a message bounce indicates that the original message contained a virus. How dare someone accuse me of sending a virus just because their mail daemon received a spoofed From: header? They could at least check the route the mail took against that header to get an idea if it's bogus. But, often automatic smam/virus filters are pretty stupid and trust the From: address. Still, I wonder if someone, somewhere, "out there" is blacklisting me because someone else forged my identity. Sounds like a defamation suit if I could find the bastards.

    And that's the rub. Often when I've received such bounces, when the originator can be identified, they refuse to help in providing a copy of the original email, headers intact, that might permit tracking down the source: either a spammer, or a spam-zombie. I wonder if I could sucessfully file "theft of computer services" charges against such an organization: they're sending me unsolicited bounces, and furthermore, refusing to backup the allegation that they're bouncing messages from me. I wonder if the anti-spam legislation that's out there can be used as a club against those who send bounces to spoofed From: addresses and refuse to acknowledge or correct their mistake.

    --
    You could've hired me.
  50. here's a list by rakerman · · Score: 1
    Windows Security Software

    I've used AVG. Some people prefer AntiVir.

  51. Housecall by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

    I've never found virus programs to be worth it - if a new worm comes out, they are rarely quick enough to update and in the meantime they always seem to really slow down your computer.

    Instead, I run a web-based anitvirus program (http://housecall.antivirus.com/) about once a month.

    Obviously I also take other precautions - only connect to the internet via a NAT router, never open email attachments, etcetera but Housecall is good, and it's free.

  52. Free anti-virus software (up to 1 year trial) by waynegoode · · Score: 1
    As part of Windows XP SP2, Microsoft is offering free trails of various anti-virus products: Norton, McAfee, CA, etc. You don't have to upgrade to XP SP2 to qualify.

    This was mentioned on /. a while back, but /. search is down and I couldn't find it quickly on Google.

  53. AVG free by chivo243 · · Score: 1

    Try AVG free virus software. much more light weight that macafee or norton....good luck

    --
    Sig Hansen?
    1. Re:AVG free by Synic · · Score: 1

      AVG is okay, but I prefer Avast! (and it integrates with several IM and P2P programs).

  54. Early retirement by Jouni · · Score: 1

    Dude,

    you just published your address on SlashDot as a mailto link. :) Talk about shooting yourself in the foot...

    Jouni

    --
    Jouni Mannonen | Game Designer, Consultant
    1. Re:Early retirement by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dude, Given my current valid/invalid ratio is below .01 already, any mail bombs will just be bouncing the rubble.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
  55. Re:Another stupid ask slashdot by IvoryRing · · Score: 1

    As in the world of trucks (there is always someone with a bigger one), on Slashdot there is always someone with a lower ID, and amung geeks there is always someone older that was running flight simulations on a slide rule. Wait... is that what you ment by geek pissing contests or were you talking about golden showers?

  56. A great free solution for you. by Mordant · · Score: 1

    Try this.

  57. Re: OT by E_elven · · Score: 1
    You know you've been IMing too long when you almost say 'lol' out loud to a non-geeky friend...

    You know, that used to be "You know you've been MUDding too long when.."
    --
    Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
  58. Heh by itwerx · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you're running Windows 98 with no antivirus and you're posting a question like this on Ask Slashdot, then yes, you are a spam zombie...

    (Okay, mod me flamebait now, it was worth it! :)

  59. Spoof. by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

    Spoofage, I get these all the time, just look at the headers. NEXT!

    --
    I hate sigs.
  60. Just stoppit! by rawg · · Score: 1

    Stop Using Microsoft Products!

    --
    The above is not worth reading.
  61. Re:No anti-virus software? Then stay off the net! by Lepruhkawn · · Score: 1
    If you have a Windows 98 machine with no anti-virus software, then stay off of the Internet. Period.


    I've had anti-virus software for years and kept it up to date and it never once blocked a virus.

    However, I've spent many hours undoing the damage done to my machine by the virus scanners themselves. And I've spent a lot of money buying new versions.

    Which person is the sucker? The one who is constantly spending time and money maintaining virus scanner installations that never block an infection or the one that has to deal with an infection every decade or so?

    I don't see anything wrong with making a risk assessment and deciding that you're better off without a scanner.

    --
    Jesus saves....And takes 1/2 damage.
  62. Re:No anti-virus software? Then stay off the net! by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

    I don't see anything wrong with making a risk assessment and deciding that you're better off without a scanner.

    It's not your place to make a "risk assessment" for your potential victims. All it takes is one f***-up by you and thousands of people end up being bombarded with viruses/worms from your infected PC.

    And I've spent a lot of money buying new versions.

    And I've spent a lot of money buying auto insurance. Maybe I should just make a "risk assessment" and decide that anyone I run into can just lump it.

    Again with the hint: Type "free antivirus software" into Google.

  63. Re:No anti-virus software? Then stay off the net! by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    I was on a mailing list once where a guy claimed to have never had a virus and to have never run AV software. He's run Windows 95, right upto WIndows XP.

  64. Don't fill Bill's pockets. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    He is carrying already too much dosh for the good of his soul and we don't want to lumber him with more than he can handle.

    Use a Win emulator in Linux, there are several very good out there that allow you to use your cranky copy of W98 if you need to do so.

    No reason to shell out more money for the guys in Redmond.

    You wanna play games? Get a PS2, a Gamecube or a GBA. They are cheaper than a full version of Windows XP.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  65. Please, read the PARENT before you reply. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent was replying to Finni, modded to negative one. Not the article. Get all the facts before you sling accusations.

  66. Please learn how to make links. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Please learn how to make links.
    <a href="http://www.spywareinfo.com/~merijn/">Merjin< /a>
    <a href="http://www.tomcoyote.org/hjt/">HijackThis</a >
    <a href="http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/freeware/p rocexp.shtml">Process Explorer</a>
    (without the "; " or any spaces put there by Slashdot) yields:
    Merjin
    HijackThis
    Process Explorer
    If that's too much typing for you,
    <URL:http://www.spywareinfo.com/~merijn/>
    <URL:ht tp://www.tomcoyote.org/hjt/>
    <URL:http://www.sysi nternals.com/ntw2k/freeware/procexp.shtml>
    (without any spaces put there by Slashdot) yields:
    http://www.spywareinfo.com/~merijn/
    http://www.tomcoyote.org/hjt/
    http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/freeware/procexp .shtml
    Also:

    Don't try and terminate the spyware's running processes.

    "Don't try to terminate".
    1. Re:Please learn how to make links. by Idealius · · Score: 1

      I know how to create links.

      I also know how to create relatively grammar-error free posts, as well. (ONE friggin error (-_-)

      I want to call you an idiot because obviously I know what I'm doing as can be seen from my previous post -- (e.g. it should be obvious I left amenities out because I was in a bind for time or something similar -- not because I don't know how..)

      Please be happy you have the information and try not to criticize too much. It's not like I post onto slashdot for a living or something..

    2. Re:Please learn how to make links. by UnrepentantHarlequin · · Score: 1

      Get Firefox. Get text/plain. Stop worrying about links. :)

    3. Re:Please learn how to make links. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm. Is this that "HTML programming" I hear so much about? I reckon I could be a programmer.

  67. Please learn how to make links. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Please learn how to make links.
    <a href="http://www.ravantivirus.com">RAV Antivirus</a>
    (without any spaces put there by Slashdot) yields: RAV Antivirus

    If that's too much typing for you,
    <URL:http://www.ravantivirus.com>
    (without any spaces put there by Slashdot) yields: http://www.ravantivirus.com/
  68. I can play this game too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "its".

    "its."

  69. Basic PC Meds. All free. by slappyjack · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've found the following helpful for the no-budget set:

    Avast Home Edition Virus Scanner

    Spybot Search and Destroy

    HijackTHIS - Find out whats in your PC. (semi-advanced)
    The site for HiJackThis seems to be down for now. THere are a few other little nifty freebie aps in there, too. Heres a mirror download site

    AdAware - picks up a lot of crap in your PC

    (Anyone wanna offer up a few opinions on this stuff? You know you do.)

    Of course, the obligatory comment of "Use Mozilla, keep your shit patched, don't click every OK button you see" still applies.

  70. dshield by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 2, Informative
    It's also a good idea to look you ip up on dshield. They aggregate firewall logs from many sources. If your IP is causing someone trouble, it is likely to show up there. Another similar service is mynetwatchman.

    -jim

  71. Re:Another stupid ask slashdot by NewStarRising · · Score: 1

    You are quite right. If he doesn;t know by now, then why should any one tell him. All this "learning" and "asking for advice"... terrible.
    Although your response assumed he asked "Where do I find free avnti-virus software?" whereas he actually asked "How can I tell if I am a spam-zombie?"

    Could you please give me a list of your approved "Ask Slashdot" questions so we can run all submissions past your superior list before wasting any more of anyones time with questions that you obviously know the answers too.

    --
    b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
    MadDwarf
  72. Find out if your IP address is spewing spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.mail-abuse.com/services/mds.html

    If you are on the list, you are a zombie.

  73. Correction by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    These authentic looking bounce messages have attachments that you're going to open, right? Don't do it! That's the payload that delivers the trojan/worm. To an improperly secured system

    Bold portion my addition.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  74. zombified? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    spaaaaaaaam....... spaaaaam....... gurgle..... spaaAAaam...... *lurches*

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  75. Re:No anti-virus software? Then stay off the net! by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    yup, because blaster, sasser, sobig and mydoom all were able to infect '98 machines. oh wait, what's that they didn't? it's actually the windows XP machines which were infected oops i guess your arguement just got shot to hell.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  76. Re:No anti-virus software? Then stay off the net! by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    Again with the hint: Type "free antivirus software" into Google.

    So you are the guy telling people to download random software from the internet and install it. Thank you very much.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  77. Re:Another stupid ask slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, the way I found out I was a spam zombie [well, the machine I was borrowing... long story] was precisely by running antivirus software. That, and all 56+ windows updates since XP came out!

    But in the process, I found I could get all kinds of useful info from this one website, that I am surprised nobody has recommended yet:

    http://www.virusall.com/

    It rocks. Virusall.com has a whole page listing free antivirus packages, and another whole page about free online checkers like MyV3 and Trend Housecall. This was one way I got around the Hosts bug, that some of the viruses had installed--the hosts list didnt have some of those minor vendors.

    I just wish there were one product that covered what adaware does AND what antiviruses do. That, and Zonealarm with *detailed* packet statistics!

    I can dream. :-)

  78. A note on F-PROT anti-virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be sure to download the DOS version rather than the Windows version. The DOS version is free (as in beer), and runs great under any DOS-based Windows (3.1, 95, 98, ME.) It's quite thorough, and only scans when you manually run it (so you don't have to worry about it eating any resources.)

    The Windows version of F-Prot, OTOH, isn't free.

  79. how do I check for trojans? by fantomas · · Score: 1

    can you recommend free/shareware software for Windows to check my computer for trojans?

    cheers

    1. Re:how do I check for trojans? by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      Adaware. The free version will do most everything you need. There are other tools that do similiar things and more. It's a good place to start though.

  80. Re:No anti-virus software? Then stay off the net! by legirons · · Score: 1

    "If you have a Windows 98 machine with no anti-virus software, then stay off of the Internet. Period."

    Why? Surely it would be more secure than a fully-patched WindowsXP machine?

    (Assuming you use well-designed browser and applications, Win98 doesn't have a lot of things to exploit w.r.t. the internet, compared to 2000/XP, which use LSASS, Windows Messenger, RPC, NetBios, file and print server, etc.

  81. Re:No anti-virus software? Then stay off the net! by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

    So you are the guy telling people to download random software from the internet and install it. Thank you very much.

    Ever heard of a review? How goddamned hard is it to do a little research on your own? Apparently too hard, so here' a link to a PC World review of free anti-virus software. But you're too clever to fall for that, aren't you? You figured out that Grisoft, Alwil, and H+BEDV Datentechnik GmbH (makers of AVG, Avast, and AntiVir anti-virus software respectively) are all providing free-for-personal-use anti-virus software that contains Trojan horses, viruses, worms, and malware because... because... well, just because!

    It's pretty damned silly to refer to anti-virus packages which have undergone scrutiny, testing, and review in the user community and the press as "random software from the internet."

  82. Re:No anti-virus software? Then stay off the net! by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

    yup, because blaster, sasser, sobig and mydoom all were able to infect '98 machines. oh wait, what's that they didn't? it's actually the windows XP machines which were infected oops i guess your arguement just got shot to hell.

    No, you didn't poke ANY holes in my argument. None. Zero. Zilch. Nada.

    You really are as dumb as a bag of rocks, aren't you? Do you have any idea of the number of exploits that have affected Windows 98 boxes? Any idea at all? Didn't think so. Did I say that Windows XP machines should be on the net without anti-virus protection? Gee, I didn't say that, did I? Now shut your pie hole and try reading before you post.

  83. Re:No anti-virus software? Then stay off the net! by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

    Why? Surely it would be more secure than a fully-patched WindowsXP machine?

    No, it would not, but neither should a Windows XP machine be on the net without anti-virus software.

  84. Re:No anti-virus software? Then stay off the net! by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    actually since I ran windows 98 and ME for several years i would know, not once did i get attacked by a remote exploit, now sure there are lots of ways for an infected executable or a local user to escalate privlidges, due to almost no isolation of processes, but win 9x is nearly impenetrable from the outside since it does not run network services the way NT/200(0|3)/XP does... speaking of dumb as a bag (box?) of rocks

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  85. Re:No anti-virus software? Then stay off the net! by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    i was not referring to that software, just your suggestions to use google. Just because something comes up high in the google results does not mean it is safe.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  86. Re:No anti-virus software? Then stay off the net! by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

    i was not referring to that software, just your suggestions to use google.

    What's wrong with using a search engine to search for things? That seems pretty logical to me. You search for "free antivirus software", click on the links, search for reviews of packages that look promising, and choose one based on your research.

    Just because something comes up high in the google results does not mean it is safe.

    I never said that a high rank in Google meant something was safe, did I?

  87. Re:No anti-virus software? Then stay off the net! by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

    actually since I ran windows 98 and ME for several years i would know, not once did i get attacked by a remote exploit

    So what? Most viruses/worms come in through exploits in Internet Explorer, Outlook Express scripting, e-mail attachments, the disk that Billy brought home from his friend's house, the "cute" attachment that cousin Millie e-mailed, etc.

    now sure there are lots of ways for an infected executable or a local user to escalate privlidges, due to almost no isolation of processes, but win 9x is nearly impenetrable from the outside since it does not run network services the way NT/200(0|3)/XP does...

    Sure, it's almost impenetrable if you never run a network enabled app. If 98 is so incredibly secure, who was spreading all of those viruses before 2000 was released? There sure weren't that many compromised copies of NT 3.51 and 4.0 floating around that they would account for the infections.

    speaking of dumb as a bag (box?) of rocks

    You were saying?

    P.S. You didn't answer my questions: "Did I say that Windows XP machines should be on the net without anti-virus protection?"

  88. qpsmtpd by stevek · · Score: 1

    is a replacement smtpd for qmail; it's pretty easy to set up, and has great filtering capabilities.

    Aside from the obvious ability to reject mail to non-existent mailboxes, it also supports uribl, dnsbl, and other blacklists, can do greylisting if you want, etc.

    The neatest feature it has, though, is to wait a few seconds after the connection before sending it's "banner". If the remote MTA sends a helo before the banner is sent, it just drops the connection. [it is a violation for the MTA to begin pipelining before the local host has said it supports ESMTP and pipelining]. This feature alone blocks 20% of all mail I get, all of which is spam sent by dedicated spam hosts, or zombies, because many of them violate this to increase the rate they send.

  89. Re:No anti-virus software? Then stay off the net! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what? Most viruses/worms come in through exploits in Internet Explorer, Outlook Express scripting, e-mail attachments, the disk that Billy brought home from his friend's house, the "cute" attachment that cousin Millie e-mailed, etc.

    Which is why you can advise them NOT to run those pieces of crap (use Firefox+Thunderbird or just Mozilla) and they'll be immune to most things.

    Yeah, I run Win 98 SE myself. I've been on a broadband connection. I've kept up my A/V. I have some common sense and am a good admin. I've yet to be infected/trojaned/etc. and I check for such things manually as well as with all the standard programs.

    Remember how we always talk about a "good admin" having a lot to do with keeping a computer secure? I'm probably more secure than the average kidiot n00b who just installed an old copy of RedHat they got in the back sleeve of a "Learn Linux in 24 Hours" book which they checked out from the library. Only to be 0wned the minute they set up IRC and joined #l33t-d00dz asking how to hack, because they were IRCing as root...

  90. Re:No anti-virus software? Then stay off the net! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stuff it, n00b.

    While you're right that that search shows AVG Antivirus (a very useful program for home users), nothing prevents a malicious Googlebomb, and I certainly don't trust all the sponsored links on the other search, for Spybot Search & Destroy...

    I know what you meant. I know what you said. You should stuff it before you make yourself out to look like more of an idiot for giving bad advice and being too foolish to accept correction.

    What do I know? I've been there too. I was wrong. Thankfully, I eventually listened to reason.

  91. Re:No anti-virus software? Then stay off the net! by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

    Stuff it, n00b.

    HAHAHAHAHAHA! Come back when you have over 20 years of professional software engineering experience.

    I know what you meant. I know what you said.

    Apparently you do not, since you've read all kinds of things into my one-sentence that I never wrote, implied, or intended.

    You should stuff it before you make yourself out to look like more of an idiot for giving bad advice and being too foolish to accept correction.

    I gave excellent advice: Again with the hint: Type "free antivirus software" into Google. That was it. The whole thing. I didn't say "Search for 'free antivirus software' in Google and install the first thing you come to without doing any further research." You and your little buddies came up with that brain-damaged idea and then tried to attribute it to me. Had you actually typed "free antivirus software" into Google, you would have found links to online ratings, user discussions, magazine reviews, etc.

    I was wrong.

    You still are.

    Now stop trolling and go away.

  92. Re:No anti-virus software? Then stay off the net! by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

    Which is why you can advise them NOT to run those pieces of crap (use Firefox+Thunderbird or just Mozilla) and they'll be immune to most things.

    Go to the average user's home and just look at the amount of spyware, adware, etc. on their system and you'll be horrified. You can give them all of the advice that you want, but as soon as some web site promises a nifty toolbar or some other free thing, they download it. Or they will open the attachment with the dancing baby sent by Aunt Millie, unaware that it's a trojan horse dropping IRC-controlled zombie-ware on their system.

    I've kept up my A/V. I have some common sense and am a good admin.

    Thank you for proving my point. Despite being a skilled computer user and having good common sense, you still recognize the need for antivirus software. All it takes is one slip-up without the AV softare and your system is toast. I recognize that, too, and have AV software on all of my systems for that reason.