Slashdot Mirror


378 Terabytes Of Star Wars on 600 G5s

Mrbill points to this USA Today story on the digital makeover given to the original Star Wars trilogy, noting that the digitized films have also been converted to HD for later release as high-definition DVDs.

42 of 416 comments (clear)

  1. Great! by Fnkmaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can now watch your childhood dreams get stomped on ... in HIGH DEFINITION!

    1. Re:Great! by RonXX · · Score: 4, Funny

      All your greatness are belong to us. You have no chance, remake for more money.

    2. Re:Great! by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Now I have become a corporation, the very thing I was against." - George Lucas

      He's gone over to the dark side.

      KFG

    3. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does that mean in a few years his son will come back to kill him and he'll see the light and finally release the originals?

  2. Ah by iamdrscience · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of course. Release the DVDs now. Special edition DVDs next year. Limited Edition DVDs the year after that. Then redo the whole cycle again on high definition DVDs, making it so that people have to buy the trilogy six times, spending a couple hundred bucks.

    Well, at least they're not releasing them both individually and as a set with different special features. That would double the number of times it will be released.

    ...I really hope George Lucas wasn't inspired by my above comment.

    1. Re:Ah by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course. Release the DVDs now. Special edition DVDs next year. Limited Edition DVDs the year after that. Then redo the whole cycle again on high definition DVDs, making it so that people have to buy the trilogy six times, spending a couple hundred bucks.

      Star Wars HD: The Search For More Money.

    2. Re:Ah by The+Bender · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "...people have to buy the trilogy six times..."

      Really?

      As far as I know, nobody is being forced to buy it even once.

    3. Re:Ah by Gondola · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've downloaded the laserdisc rips you refer to, or at least, "some laserdisc version of the original Star Wars trilogy ripped from laserdisc and available online through various p2p applications." Disclaimer done.

      Anyway, the version I looked at was pretty crappy; it was blurry like I would expect a VHS version to be.

      I'd rather see a couple apocryphal scenes (obligatory reference to Han vs. Greedo) than look at grainy 200-lines-of-resolution rips.

      Seriously, at this stage of my life, I understand the nostalgia, and I'll gladly trade 480p and surround sound for the price of Han vs. Greedo and the other additions of questionable worth. I *want* the cleaned up special effects transparencies, and I don't mind a little cleaning up here and there, although I would prefer the original soundtrack, not any substituted audio or music.

      On another topic, at the risk of being shouted down by hordes of fanboys, the original Star Wars is overrated. It was a great trilogy (I was disappointed by Jedi, but it was Completion to the series, and I am a forgiving person), but there was something more behind it that caused all of us kids growing up seeing the movies to become fans like we did: marketing.

      The marketing juggernaut behind Star Wars is what got the hundreds of action figures and model sets, fast food cups and posters and toys, t-shirts, towels, lunchboxes, watches, cookie jars, etc. etc. into our homes.

      I would argue that the toys themselves are what kept Star Wars alive much longer had there been a mediocre marketing campaign behind it. When the movie was out of the theater (after an amazingly long run IIRC), we still had our action figures and toy sets to put them in. Personally, I had several friends with Star Wars figures, and we would pool our Star Wars toy resources and set up bases and enact elaborate battle scenes, scenes from the movies, and scenes we would create on our own. We still had the posters, the magazines, the watches, the lunchboxes (I had the original metal Star Wars lunch box, but the last time I saw it (about 15 years ago) it had already rusted up pretty badly.) the bedsheets, etc., etc., to remind us and keep Star Wars close in our thoughts.

      This indoctrination of a whole generation in the Star Wars mythos created the best ongoing Star Wars marketing; fans who had SW so ingrained in their life that their favorite philosopher wasn't Socrates or Plato; philosophy and wisdom meant Yoda. Kids (mostly kids, some weird adults) who saw these movies as they were growing up, took Star Wars almost as a replacement for religion or oral tradition, or as a replacement for every Mother Goose story their parents never read them because they were too busy working overtime because they were single parents, or because dad was an emotional cripple as a result of his dad being an emotional cripple.

      I'm sure if some interested college psych major wanted to, he could interview hundreds of 30-something children who gravitated to Star Wars and come up with a great dissertation subject about marketing and the psychological effects on young children who become overdoctrinated with commercialized fictional characters.

  3. Special Edition Questions... by IanDanforth · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Can someone in the know please answer these questions?

    1. When the much hated special editions were released, were the originals digitized and altered then reprinted?

    2. Is the stock that this company used the original, originals? Meaning that when lucas got the cleaned-up digitized versions he had to go back and redo all the SE stuff?

    finally

    3. Does this give hope to the idea there might someday be a Highdefinition original cut version of the films?

    Thanks in advance!

    1. Re:Special Edition Questions... by bottlerocket · · Score: 5, Informative
      1. Yes. Lucas wasn't on his digital projection kick yet.
      2. Well, the articles claim that they are the original prints. They describe how they've been sitting in storage for more than twenty years. But if they are the originals, that does raise the question of whether all the new special effects had to be reinserted.
      3. Original cut, no. Those are dead and gone and will never be released again. But HD-DVDs of the Special Editions? Oh, you betcha.
      --
      where the comment ends and sig begins
    2. Re:Special Edition Questions... by Thedalek · · Score: 4, Informative

      Original cut, no. Those are dead and gone and will never be released again. But HD-DVDs of the Special Editions? Oh, you betcha.

      That's a little misleading. The original cut may not exist in assembled form (although I suspect it actually does, despite Lucas' claims otherwise), but the original stock that comprises it almost certainly does. That, or the SE stock sans CG effects (that is, cleanup only) still exists. I seriously doubt that Lucas took original archival material which would provide for a better source in the event of additional changes and thrown it in a fire or something.

      After all, he may eventually want to run with the idea of Jabba being a humanoid.

      Anyway, if such material still exists, it will almost certainly be released immediately following GL's death. But please, don't kill him. I wouldn't want the legal backlash of giving you the idea.

      --
      Happiness is relative, Based upon the way we live.
  4. Speaking of degredation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scratches and loss of color is not the only degredation to SW that seems to have developed over time. A copy I watched recently seemed to have developed small cute computer animated characters that detracted from the development of suspense in the film..

  5. Coming to HD DVD... by AvantLegion · · Score: 4, Funny
    ... not only does Greedo shoot first, he shoots TWICE!

  6. Restore again? by iamdrscience · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why exactly did it need to be restored again anyways? I mean, wasn't it restored for the THX video re-releases a decade ago and further restored for the theatrical re-releases with new scenes?

    1. Re:Restore again? by falcon5768 · · Score: 5, Informative
      if you compair the images there are numerous touch ups...

      Jabba looks MUCH better in the first one

      the image is cleaned up even more

      the rotoscoping effects on the lightsabers are cleaned up and made to look like the current sabers

      now Han and Geedo shoot at the same time

      biggest change, now its Hayden as Anikan at the end ghost scene

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    2. Re:Restore again? by advocate_one · · Score: 5, Interesting

      every time they make editorial/artistic changes they get to reset the copyright clock. Mere cleaning up wouldn't have let them do this.

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  7. Now.. by Laimbrane · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they could only digitally remaster Lucas to restore him to his original 1970's form. I'd pay 70 bucks for that.

  8. Oho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So that's how Lucas intends to discourage piracy.

    I have to hand it to him; Between not having enough space and bandwidth, and not wanting to see how he's butchered Star Wars this time, I don't think I would bother trying to share the 378TB of video.

    I tip my pirate hat to you. Arr.

  9. Just saw some of it on TV by dancingmad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have been refusing to give any more money to Lucas, be it the new DVDs or Episode III, but the commercials for the trilogy DVDs almost (ALMOST!) changed my mind) they change is very apparent, even if you've watched the LDs or especially on cable. All three films look much crisper and brighter - I almost thought for a second that Lucas had added some new stuff.

    I still won't be buying the trilogy, but I'm amazed at how good the restoration looks.

    --
    "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
  10. Come on by SavedLinuXgeeK · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Like honestly, I understand keeping with the original, but in retrospect if you really wanted the true triology, you would pull out your VHS tapes, and watch it into oblivion. When you put in a dvd that is low-quality, poor sound, yeah the novelty will be pretty cool, and the story carries it, but it would get old fast. In comparison to everything we have now, the late 1970's were not known for their technological feats. And while I would rather him not add the extra scenes to the movie, the fact that he remastered the audio, and is hidef'ing the video is a plus. Basically its either original and crappy, or hidef sweetness and alterations.

    --
    je suis parce que j'aime
  11. Same films? by iamdrscience · · Score: 4, Funny

    So now that it's been restored 3 times, had scenes added once and re-edited twice, how many re-releases do you think it will take before it contains no shred of the original film and it becomes a romantic comedy set in a hospital?

  12. Re:Raiders of the Lost Arch by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Go for it George Lucas. Ruin all of your movies. "

    Empire Strikes back, despite being 'special', is still entertaining.

    Though I agree with the sentiment, we've been around this block a million times. Don't buy it. Let the people who do enjoy it. In the mean time, let's talk about something a little more up-beat:

    - Lots of people were employed to work on this.
    - The technology and experience will help ILM make better effects for upcoming movies.

    - SW in HD will hopefully make broad adoption of higher-resolution DVD players an easier transition.

    - Just the number '378 Terabytes' is enough to cause underwear tents to rise all over the Slashdot population.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  13. G5s of Purity by Mulletproof · · Score: 4, Funny

    So does being done on Apple G5's constitute a washing away of all of lucas' sins, or will they have to burn the hardware in order to keep the contamination from spreding???

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  14. High Def of Low Def by airider · · Score: 5, Informative

    So the question I've been dying to find out from all the high def zealots out there is... does making a high definition recording of something originally recorded in some other definition (in this case celluloid) going to look "better"? It's been my experience dealing with image processing of "analog" imagery that the higher up in resolution you go, the more "anomolies" can be detected...i.e. there is only so much you can do with the original baseline, and going up in resolution requires huge amounts of post processing to clean up those anomolies. AAANNND the final product is still limited by the originals. So even if we get more lines of resolution from the celluloid, the celluloid is still the limit on how good you can go. So will high def DVD STAR WARS look better than standard DVD STAR WARS. Probably, but not any better than the original and not THAT much better than standard DVD. I think the movie industry (and music too) have lost the fact that we aren't clamoring for higer resolutions of our recorded media, we just want ones that don't wear out. That's why I think SACD and DVD-A haven't taken off.

  15. I wonder... by Johnny+Fusion · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet if the restoration was done on a beowulf cluster of old amigas running Linux, everyone would start saying Greedo shooting first was the best thing that ever happened to the trilogy...

    (Holy Karma-Risk Batman!)

    --
    There are two kinds of fool. One says, This is old, and therefore good. And one says, This is new, and therefore better.
  16. The HD Master Being Kept in Storage... by Class+Act+Dynamo · · Score: 5, Funny

    virtually guaranteeing that the Hans/Greedo controversy will continue. At this rate, soon Hans will not have even shot Greedo. It will turn out that due to a high fat diet and sedentary life-style befitting a rich assasin, Greedo's arteries were clogged full of cholesterol. Hans didn't shoot Greedo, he was dead before he hit the table!!

    --
    My other computer is a Jacquard loom.
  17. The saga on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Quick summary of posts to follow:

    1) Lucas is a money-grubbing third-rate director.
    2) Can they wipe out Jar-Jar?
    3) Jar-Jar is not in these episodes, you moron.
    4) Who you calling a moron? Lucas is a money-grubbing moron.
    5) Why are they doing it on Macs when it is cheaper to do it on Linux?
    6) No, it's not. Look at Virginia Tech.
    7) Teh MACS suck.
    8) Nope, you idiot, M$ sucks.
    9) You are all idiots, Lucas sucks.

    Nothing else to see here. Move along now.

  18. Re:Finally by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Its nice to see that we're finally getting the original 3 films on DVD... it does piss me off a bit that Lucas seems to do everything he can to ear a few more bucks... first we'll redo them and release them in to different VHS boxed sets. Wait a few years, now we'll do them on DVD. Wait a few years, now we'll release the HD versions."

    You know what? I'm sick of listening to people bitch about George Lucas bilking the fan-base with multiple releases. Its not like George is up at Skywalker Ranch snorting his wealth up his nose like most of Hollywood. The man spends his money on making the "film" process better. Look at what ILM has done for films since 1977. How about THX sound? Yeah, thank George Lucas for that. He'll also be one of the reasons why movies will eventually been shown at the theatres in digital form. At such time, it won't matter if you go to the theatre on opening night or two weeks later, the "film" will look the same. No "cigarette burns," vertical strip lines, or any other glaring issues with the projection will you ever deal with again.

    Now compare that to say, MGM, with multiple releases of the James Bond series. Are they getting any better? Not really. Where's the MGM profits going to? Bankrolling sequels to "Legally Blonde"? Yeah, Lucas really bilks us cinema fans alright.

    Go back to bitching about Greedo shooting first. At least that's a valid criticism.

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  19. Re:Finally by 0racle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You want the original films? These are not the films your looking for.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  20. Re:Finally by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Its nice to see that we're finally getting the original 3 films on DVD

    We certainly are not.

    You people are getting something very close to it though. With a few inane and useless change here and there. The orihinal, these are not.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  21. Re:Links! by hype7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Star Wars, terrabytes, and lots of G5s, all posted on /.

    the porn sites are going to have a bad day today

    -- james

  22. Re:Finally by Babbster · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You're most assuredly right on the multiple-release issue. If George were ONLY about bilking people out of cash (I do concede that he's at least partly about that, whatever he happens to spend the money on) we would have had Star Wars on DVD two years ago, and the one coming soon would be the "special special edition" DVD set with the new changes.

    If you want to see what real bilking is all about, take a look at the various versions/packaging of the Die Hard series. Or, how about the hosing taken by those who bought the South Park discs with four episodes a piece while the series is now being released season by season with more extras. In the "for kids" category it gets even worse with shows like Justice League and X-Men released in multiple un-numbered editions only to be collected in yet another edition - at particularly high risk for accidental re-buys since often the parents don't even pay much attention to the cartoons.

    In short, George Lucas is NOT a multiple-release offender except in the imagination of those projecting his future actions. Of course, I don't think taking advantage of new technology (such as HD-DVD, Blu-Ray, etc.) even counts - it would be like complaining that since Star Wars is out on VHS, there's no reason to buy the DVDs (there are other content reasons not to buy the DVDs but that's a different discussion entirely).

  23. Some more details by smallpaul · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ian Caven is a regular member of the Vancouver Python User's Group and he spoke about this amazing system at our conference a month ago.

    One intersting bit is that the vast majority of this system is written in Python using numpy. Ian says "he doesn't know how they would have done it" otherwise. C is used for the inner loops but Python does the majority of the algorithmic stuff that makes one image processing job (e.g. removing dust) different from another (e.g. correcting for film degradation). Python also manages all of the distributed processing.

    Another interesting bit is that they are using Python, Zope and HTTP to make a virtual file system for managing the frames and movies. This will help with the storage management problems that arise from working with such massive files.

    There are other amazing facts but it is hard to know which are competitive secrets that are better not divulged. One hint I'll give is that the productivity of the programmers at this company would shock you. They've obviously benefitted from building on a very high-level language and they also have some very sharp tools they've built themselves to make these amazing jobs possible.

  24. Re:Thank you Mr Lucas for raping my childhood by inkswamp · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I'm sure I'll get modded as a troll, but there really is a real message here, but first let me get this out of my system...

    Just shut the fuck up. Please? They're movies, for fuck's sake. Some of us enjoy them and would like to continue doing so without you and your gloomy band of whiners coming along to piss in the pool. I love the original movies too. I've watched them more times than I can count and can recite my favorite lines, but it's not my religion. I cannot relate to you whiners who consider these films to be some cornerstone of your existence. I wish you would all just fuck off and stop spazzing out every time the words Star Wars flash in front of your face.

    There... much better. Now on with the comment.

    They were part of my childhood too, but I had lots and lots of other great things in my childhood that had nothing to do with Lucasfilm Ltd. so even if Lucas decided to replace the characters in films with Looney Tunes animations, it wouldn't really make that big a dent in my life. If Lucas wants to futz around with the originals to make them his ultimate vision, then more power to him. Yeah, it sucks a little because it drills a little hole in that precious bag of nostalgia that we carry around, but in the end, is it really that big a deal?

    Seriously? Did you really feel the need to scream rape of your childhood like that?

    Get over it. Quick. And please stop drawing attention to yourself every time you feel your precious youth has been violated by a fucking movie. It gets tiresome REAL quick.

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  25. Re:Forget the DVD's... by NTmatter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, I figure that by the time that anyone's finished downloading it, 500TB hard drives will be the norm.

  26. Re:Forget the DVD's... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Informative
    Here you go, these are laserdisc rips encoded for DVD burning. The torrents worked just a couple of weeks ago.
    - Sound is English Dolby 2.0 Surround
    - Audio Commentary
    - English Subtitles (the kind burned into the image for alien speak)
    - Chapters Selection (the 79 original LD markers)
    - Production Notes
  27. 378 Terabytes you say? by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh my god, that must be real high definition!!

    But why the heck do you need 600 G5s to view it?

    This "locking viewers in with Apple hardware" bullshit must go!

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  28. It's the search for more money. by sgant · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I mean, doesn't anyone else here see what Lucas is doing? He's not stomping on your childhood dreams...it's pure marketing genius. Remeber back when Coke said it was changing the recipe for Coca-Cola? Their sales went through the roof for the ORIGINAL coke!

    He's releasing the "Special Editions" now. He'll make the money off of them...let them stay out there for like a year or two. THEN it will be get the entire box set of Episodes 1-6 that will set you back like $150...let that stay out there a few years until they don't sell anymore.

    Then around 6 years from now or so, the Original 3 movies with no changes at all...the ones that were released starting back in 1977 will be a box set. There's certainly a market for this now and everyone that's bitching and moaning will snatch it up!

    Lucas won't be laughing all the way to the bank btw...he'll just install a bank at Skywalker Ranch and be done with it.

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    1. Re:It's the search for more money. by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 4, Informative

      I remember some changes from the original 1977 release and the "A New Hope" release that came out with "The Empire Strikes Back". Most vivid in my memory is the bridge scene inside the death star: I recall Luke throwing his rope once, and it missed. The door opens a little bit, and Leia shoots stormtroopers on the other side, Luke throws the rope again, it catches, Leia kills the last storm troopers on the other side, climbs on Luke, and kisses him. He is startled, and asks "What was that for", and she answers "for luck", and they swing across.

      Can anyone else confirm or deny?

    2. Re:It's the search for more money. by toastgoddess · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't see this listed as a change in the exhaustive list of Special Edition changes.

      Personally I'm most intrigued by the small decisions - the removal of a flame effect from the shooting of an Imperial Officer, or the translation of the tractor beam label from English to Lucasian. (That was changed in the 2004 edition, not the SE.)

  29. Butchered? by dfj225 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You know, as a Star Wars fan I tend to dislike some of the changes made in the SE of the original series. So people even go as far as to say that Lucas butchered the series. I don't really see how this could be considered butchering the series. If you enjoyed the movies in their original form, you should still be able to enjoy them now. The core of the movies remains untouched, and only a few scenes had small alterations. Star Wars is still great in my mind, it still has a great story, battles that were way before its time, and an engulfing universe that continues to be expanded today. If a few changes ruined the movies for you, then you must not have enjoyed them that much in the first place.

    --
    SIGFAULT
  30. Re: 378 Terabytes Of Star Wars on 600 G5s by Quatermass · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nice article. But nothing new.

    If you are interested in reading more on how the experts restore old stock then you can't do better than visit the 'Doctor Who Restoration' web site.
    These bunch of guys have to restore awful video and film masters from the sixties.

    http://www.restoration-team.co.uk/

    Look up in the DVD releases section:
    'Lost in Time' or the detailed 'The Seeds of Death' article.

    They have before and after examples that will blow your mind!

    --
    Stuart http://stuarthalliday.com/