Slashdot Mirror


IBM to Open Voice Recognition Software

phug writes "According to the NY Times, IBM is donating code that it estimates cost the company $10 million to develop. One collection of speech software for handling basic words for dates, time and locations, like cities and states, will go to the Apache Software Foundation. The company is also contributing speech-editing tools to a second open-source group, the Eclipse Foundation." There's not much information out there yet - e.g. no word on licenses etc. It is worth pointing out that the Eclipse Foundation was started by IBM.

13 of 189 comments (clear)

  1. Great news by wertarbyte · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is great, ViaVoice has disappeared for quite a while now on linux, I hope that this will open a great variety of cool open source applications. If this will be made modular like e.g. festival, I can think of endless applications worth using it.

    --
    Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
    1. Re:Great news by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think we will see a lot of cool applications for this like virtual ticket sales counters/telemarketing calls (ask a question through the phone and the computer will look up an answer) as well as tech support phone centres!

      No need to outsource to India, opensource it to Linux & ViaVoice!

      Woohoo! +1 for IBM again!

  2. ViaVoice by cerberusss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is this ViaVoice? The linux packages have been pulled off the IBM site a year or so ago but they're still floating around.

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  3. Code-by-voice by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Eclipse is actually a kind-of Swiss Army Chainsaw -IDE. You can make plugins for pretty much everything, so one could speculate that a voice recognition plugin would be feasible.

    I don't know about everyone else, but the concept of coding by voice does fascinate me. There are obvious issues (like eliminating having to say every single control character (if at all possible)), but with a background of RSI I think it's at least worth a shot.

    Thoughts?

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    1. Re:Code-by-voice by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One more thing I forgot to mention in the parent:

      Given the fact that most languages have a rather limited vocabulary, and the fact that class libraries and defined functions/variables can be extracted from existing code software like this could make educated guesses on what you were trying to say.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    2. Re:Code-by-voice by dJOEK · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Eclipse is known for it's good GUI api (or at least it's better than regular swing)

      the only way to make voice commands work is to integrate them into your GUI

      so your OK-button object does not only have a textlabel-value but also an audiolabel.

      this works both ways, one way for accessibility ('hear' what button you will click) and the other way is using your own voice to 'click' it (by saying 'Ok')

      --
      Exercise caution when modding this message up: the author acts like a jerk when his karma is excellent.
  4. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why is it doing this, is it because they think they can make more money with increased software sales? It also might be an advertising campaign, $10 million donation is buying a lot of free coverage.

    Corporations dont usually give a way stuff for nothing, in fact their mission by law is to maximize profit.

  5. That means one ore thing missing in linux gone? by drmancini · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When you look at GNU/Linux as a complex system and think of the things that users complain about when Linux usability is concerned, GPL'd speech recognition software is definitely one of them.

    Hooray for IBM and as Ali said in the Linux ad "don't back down"!!

    --

    Never underestimate the power of idiots in large groups
  6. Human-Centered Computing! by Milo+Fungus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My brother (who works for IBM) recently sent me an article on USA Today about the system IBM and Honda have developed for speech-interface with a GPS-enabled navigation computer. Really cool stuff.

    For those of you who haven't read it, check out The Unfinished Revolution by Michael Dertouzos. I don't agree with all of his analysis (he was a little lacking in pragmatism on some points), but overall this book was very insightful. This book, along with Weaving the Web by Tim Berners-Lee, caused a big paradigm shift in my thinking about computer technology.

  7. Nice M$-Comment at the end by echappement · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Nice title;
    Speech code from IBM to become open source

    And even better.. the comment from Microsoft, quoted at the end of the article
    "IBM has not executed in bringing this technology to a broad market as Microsoft has."

    Beside the jokes; The article states as well that Microsoft introduced their Speech Server 2004 last March, and that 100,000 software programmers have downloaded Microsoft's free software developers' kit for building speech applications on its Windows .Net technology. What exactly is the difference in quality and approach between the package from M$ and the one here mentioned from IBM ?

  8. Re:Code or training? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe set up sort of a ViaVoice@Home project where every geek can help training the software?
    Actually it should be quite easy: The client reads your keyboard and the microphone, and you are supposed to speak loudly whatever you type. The training results are regularly exchanged with the central server.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  9. IBM also has a grammar based system. by perky · · Score: 4, Interesting
    IBM also has (or rather had in 98,99,2000) a grammar based recognition system based on the same engine, but using compiled grammars and naturally a cut down acoustic model dependant on the contents of the grammar. There was also a toolset, supporting compiling grammars from BNF, building speech telephony applications and so forth.


    IBM Hursley labs had a name dialler 5 years ago that let you phone the computer, say the name fo the person you wanted to speak with, and get put through. They also had a system that provided weather forecasts based on the name of the city or country you said. I was pleased to name the latter "Global Weather Information System" or GWIS, pronounced Gee-whizz. Both ran on the machine under my desk. Both worked reasonably well, especially given that a lot of the acoustic models for names and places were automagically generated.

    --
    "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
  10. Re:Viable by notthepainter · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Yes and no.

    I used to work for MacSpeech, we also did large vocabulary dictation systems like ViaVoice.

    Back when I was there it really wasn't viable for most people.

    However, not all people can type, this includes both the "Hands Free" market (disabilities) and the "Hands Busy" market. Surprisingly, many people also don't want to type, this includes medical and legal professionals. They have an interesting problem, they often need to generate large amounts of boilerplate text quickly. Doctors, Radiologist, Lawyers are also all pretty smart and they heavily use the macro packages to contstruct documentation systems that suit their needs exactly. As you might also imagine, VARS step in and also make these macros.

    Is it for you? Maybe not, but it is for a lot of people.