Slashdot Mirror


Zero Gravity Flights for the Rest of Us

waynegoode writes "Zero G Corporation, whose motto is "Question Gravity", is now offering zero gravity flights to the general public. For $3000 you get training and a 90 minute ride with 15 periods of 25 seconds of low or zero-gravity: 3 1/3 Mars gravity, 3 1/6 Lunar gravity, and 9 zero gravity. Peter Diamandis, the man behind the Ansari X Prize, worked 11 years to get FAA approval. Previously, such flights were available only to astronauts, researchers, and Tom Hanks; although recently flights for the public began Russia for about twice the price. Story also here."

15 of 332 comments (clear)

  1. It sounds nice... by east+coast · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Consider that sky-diving can also offer you zero-g styled environment and it almost seems like a ripoff. If you were doing serious research it would be worth the cash but just for the sensation of free fall you can do better for less.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    1. Re:It sounds nice... by Xoro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Consider that sky-diving can also offer you zero-g styled environment

      Not really, because in skydiving the local atmosphere is not falling at the same rate as you. I would expect the sensations to be very different.

      --
      Kill, Tux, kill!
    2. Re:It sounds nice... by gilmour14 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ...idea of throwing oneself out of a perfectly good airplane

      To this same comment, my skydive instructor replied, "If there was such thing as a perfectly good airplane, the parachute would never have been invented."

  2. Re:*Ahem* by nebaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All orbit is is free fall with enough horizontal velocity to match. Orbit simply is fast free fall. Zero-g exists in orbit. How is this different?

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
  3. Re:*Ahem* by Joe5678 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In case anyone's interested, skydiving is a cheaper way of obtaining a similar experience. The primary difference with skydiving is the lack of walls.


    I would say the primary difference with skydiving is the wind... which you would not experience if you were inside a box/plane.

  4. 11 years! by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Jesus,

    what the hell was the FAA thinking.

    If this isn't an advertisment for reducing the size of goverment I don't know what is.

    Civil dis-obedience is rapidly becoming mandatory behaviour.

  5. Roller coaster ride for $30? by peter303 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wouldnt you get a similar effect on some of the larger roller coasters? You could ride one 25 times for a days admission to a theme park.

  6. Re:*Ahem* by BinLadenMyHero · · Score: 2, Insightful

    skydiving is a cheaper way of obtaining a similar experience. The primary difference with skydiving is the lack of walls.

    What about the wind?
    Tried neither, but seems that sould be very different..

  7. Re:And I thought... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Well, they do get 15 periods of 25 second zero Gs, and that should give plenty of screen time for the "money shot". It's about 6 minutes or so, and with multiple cameras, they could log a lot of footage. Besides, the price is quite low for a commercial production. Most of the rest could be done on a sound stage someplace...

    I do think, however, they might want to charge an extra "clean up" premium on porn shoots...

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  8. Re:*Ahem* by cjh79 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, try to remember (I know this is hard sometimes) that this company is trying to make money. I'm sure they understand the physics of their airplane rides, but to the general public "Zero Gravity" sounds a lot more exotic and exciting than "Free Falling." You can't blame them for trying to market their product.

  9. Re:Combine this with normal travel by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They do this with regular passenger airliners once in a while, though in most cases the landing is a bit on the rough side.

  10. Re:*Ahem* by hedge_death_shootout · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That should read "Free-Fall Flights for the Rest of Us". Zero Gravity has a very different meaning, and hasn't been an acceptable substitute for "free-fall" in 20+ years.

    Bah. This is pedantry. (on slashdot!?)

    Astronauts floating in the space shuttle are experiencing 'free fall' rather than 'zero gravity'. But not many people would quibble with using the term 'zero gravity' in that instance.
    The zero G experienced on this plane is the same zero G experienced by astronauts in orbiting vehicles.

    And skydiving isnt very similar at all - you'll reach terminal velocity quickly and will 'feel' the force of gravity thereafter. Not to mention it's a lot windier. Skydiving on the moon on the other hand... just dont come crying to me when your parachute doesnt work.

  11. Re:*Ahem* by -Surak- · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The plane has ENGINES. It can exceed terminal velocity in a dive.

  12. Re:25 secs? by bchernicoff · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, they'd be fine. As the plane pulls out of the dive, "gravity" gradually increases back to one G.

  13. Re:Zero G on the Cheep! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Don't. Please.

    I lost friends in high school to "hill topping". In a controlled environment it could be pretty fun, but there are far too many ways to Darwin yourself:

    1. Be a few degrees from parallel to the direction of the road when you get air. By the time you land, you're displaced laterally from your driving lane by several feet in either direction. Oncoming cars or fixed barriers suck when you're airborne at ballistic speeds.
    2. Discover a loose farm animal standing in the middle of the road. Brakes work poorly when you're not in contact with the driving surface.
    3. Any other permutation of "inadvertent change in velocity vector", "large object", and "non-acceleration due to lack of friction"

    I dare say that the "vomit comet" is far safer than jumping your car on some hill out on the middle of nowhere.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?