Slashdot Mirror
Mozilla's Goodger on Firefox's Future
An anonymous reader writes "The New Zealand Herald has an interview with Ben Goodger, lead engineer for Firefox at the Mozilla foundation. In it he describes how he got started, his reasons for Firefox's existence and what the future may hold for the little browser that could."
Its nice to see firefox is doing so well. Mozilla is just a resource hug.. Thats why i changed :)
That's not spyware. That's multiple IE windows :)
1) Take 90% of browser market share
2) Integrate into Windows Explorer and tell judges it can't be ripped out
My best sig is this one.
An easier wish might be "Slashdot updates its HTML for 2001."
2. Firefox renders slashdot correctly, since this is the site that promotes it the most.
No, the IT theme is meant to be like that
...just cracks me up. "Mozilla's Goodger on Firefox's Future"
It just sounds DIRTY... If there was some guys Goodger in my future, I'd certainly try to do something about it...
"The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his." - Patton
What's wrong with Ponsonby or Remuera - much classier. Or Manukau, Otahuhu, Papatoetoe - much more authentic. They could offer a porn-optimised version of Firefox codenamed "K-Road".
And I just switched a coworkers todays toos! He had 10-11 different spywares on his computers toos! Wows!
It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Of course, I personally downloaded 300,000 of them myself, just to stuff the ballot box, so to speak... :-) :-)
It's well known (by me, and for no good reason at that) that they don't use CSS because they think HTML should be enough for any web page. After all, everyone knows that CSS is for LiveJournal lusers to set their scroll bar colors, and could not possibly have any practical application. Real men use tables for layout, and that's that. A real programmer would never prefer CSS's long spelled out english words like border-color in favor of HTML's ULs and TDs. People who use CSS to obtain some result that could be possible with straight HTML are obviously being inefficient. They are probably wasting several bytes on those long, spelled out words. /. in Netscape Navigator 3.0. It will surely choke on the CSS, and give some unpredictable result.
The content is the only thing matters is the content anyway. If it's so bad, why don't you make your own front end for the RSS feed? That's the true Open Source way! Plus, what if someone tries to access
Better safe than sorry.
I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
Mods, how is this funny? This is interesting, maybe insightful or at the least informative? Underrated if you will. Flamebait if you are hardcore IE'er. Troll if msft gives you a pay cheque. Redundant if you don't know what it means. But not funny. ARRRLovin is making a good point. Come on.
Free XBox, PS2
And here chimes in Mr. Doesn't-Get-The-Joke to spoil everyone's fun.
Comment of the year
No, he'll get modded up for saying 'Now mod me down'. Didn't you get the memo?
I'm an undergrad that saw both the Firefox and Linux light. I'm now prostletyzing for both.
Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
No. This is normal... they're just dupes.
But seriously, I am getting current articles from the feed.
Try blocking port80, that should get most of them. If that doesn't work, try port 21 as well.
Can I get an eye poke?
Dog House Forum
Ohh... It's a guy. Okay. Carry on.
I prefer a void in conversation to a vacuous one.
I'm now prostletyzing for both.
I'd suggest that you put off preaching to the masses until you've finished the more important task of completing English 101.
Either that, or apply for a job as a Slashdot editor. In two sentences you've managed to make an excellent case concerning your qualifications.
Max
My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
If all you're doing is looking at porn then you don't need Trojans.
i was going to blame /. for the way the web site renders in Firefox.
,its actually firefox.
/. since its HTML is not valid.
/. or shall i play safe and blame MicroSoft.
Then i read that its not Slashdot
Then i read that it actually is
So can i continue blaming
many thanks for your invaluable opinions.
Wanted : A Signature.
Yeah! And real men read web pages using only cat, parsing the HTML in their heads!
I really think Slashdot updating their HTML would be _much_ harder than what was suggested above. MUUUUUCH harder. I think what was suggested above will happen much sooner.
I think you are probably right. And so does somebody else!
I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
In Modern Slashdot, 2004 is updated for HTML 3.0.
Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
The conspiracy theories are fun to read though... hey, I said we emitted HTML 3.2... I never said it was valid :)