Amazon's A9.com Search Engine Goes Live
scapermoya writes "Today was the official launch day of Amazon's A9.com search engine, which has been in public beta for some time now. It uses results from Google, and adds some personalized features, like bookmarks and search history. Its Java-heavy inteface reminds me of Gmail, which is nice. It doesn't seem like it was designed to supplant Google, but rather to flesh out some things that a certain demographic of people might like."
The A9 toolbar only works in Microsoft Internet Explorer.
A9 bowls a Googly
Karma: Coma, mostly due to Massive Attack
not the same thing, not even nearly.
More details available here
I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
Its Java-heavy interface
You mean Javascript-heavy interface?
JP
Didn't we already read about this a couple of days ago?
Be better in bed. Wikiafterdark!
Unclick the Images button on the right side. Problem solved. And since the service seems to cater towards personalization, perhaps it'll remember that you don't want images included in your results?
The books button was not automatically selected for me, so you actually have to actively be looking for info in books, it doesn't just serve up Amazon results.
So, in conclusion, pick the results you want.
See Google APIs for details
A search for "amazon" gives me the ad:
How to Cheat Amazon
and a search for "used books" doesn't even show amazon on the first page of results.
so either:
1) they're being fair and not taking advantage of their position (yet)
2) they're not business savvy enough
But the page IS made on Java Server Pages/Servlets. So the reference to Java is correct. That it also uses Javascript is very normal... (Still, Sun and Netscape made the first implementation of Javascript together (First Netscape named it LiveScript). Javascript would 'supplement' Java applets. Javascript looks even a little similar to Java itself. Netscape even had a project to write Java dynamically in the form of Javascript: LiveConnect)
F/OSS & IT Consultant
If you don't want Amazon tracking your searches, use http://generic.a9.com/, which doesn't look like it even sets any cookies.
Why can't I moderate something "Wrong" or at least "Grossly Misinformed"?
That seems anonymous enough.