A shadowban is where you can see your posts, but nobody else can. When it's done, the only way you can find out is by disabling cookies and searching for your comments - which will have vanished. Not fun, especially if you're a paying subscriber to the site.
On Fark, they also play "fun" tricks like faking database errors or randomly hiding half the comments on a story for users the moderators don't like for whatever reason.
Me, I was permanently shadowbanned for replying to a comment which mentioned a site that the Fark mods disapprove of, so you can see why I'm not well disposed to the place or their policies.
There's something to that, but I'd say that the majority of books are read once or twice at most so in that sense they're disposable. Of course there are reference books too, but how much of a market will they be? When Amazon tried introducing the Kindle 2 to college students they found it unsatisfactory as a way to read and refer to text books so that's probably not going to be a huge market.
On the truly disposable side, newspapers and magazines are frothing at the bit to get digital subscriptions on the iPad, but e-ink needs colour to make it a compelling choice. My bet is that these readers will find their niche in recreational novels, where the content is effectively disposable leading to a revenue stream based on sales of content, not hardware.
What Apple did was invert the normal rules by being first to market with a credible MP3 player and leveraging their extremely loyal base. It was a beautifully executed coup, but not one that Amazon or B&N are in a position to duplicate. They gave it a go, but now they're having to fall back on the tried and true Gillette model.
Two processors are used regardless of the licence. It just makes things easier from a hardware perspective to have one processor dedicated to the phone network functions and another to the UI and assorted programs.
Fair enough, that's the way I understand the trade-offs too. I was just a little surprised to see no mention of the LGPL in your article and wondered if it was part of a sinister plot to deprecate the licence.
In case anyone doesn't know, shadowbanning is where you can post and see your comments as normal, but nobody else sees them. Basically, you're screaming into the void - and if you're a donor you're paying for the privilege.
In other words, it's a rather childish type of fraud.
Yes I am shadowbanned on Fark, for the crime of replying to a comment which mentioned a rival site. I hope Slashdot can avoid that crap.
Slashdot Mirror
Here's another one ... Try :x instead of :wq
And a fun little 4 pen plotter I used to draw wire frame graphics.
I have good news for you - the 787 is a plastic tube, not metal.
I nominate Jon Katz.
Nevermind. I misread and thought your post was directed at me.
The first fake database error gave it away after about 30 minutes. They aren't as clever as they think they are.
You're operating under a false assumption. Sorry to disappoint ;)
It's a good place for all us waifs and strays, true.
A shadowban is where you can see your posts, but nobody else can. When it's done, the only way you can find out is by disabling cookies and searching for your comments - which will have vanished. Not fun, especially if you're a paying subscriber to the site.
On Fark, they also play "fun" tricks like faking database errors or randomly hiding half the comments on a story for users the moderators don't like for whatever reason.
Me, I was permanently shadowbanned for replying to a comment which mentioned a site that the Fark mods disapprove of, so you can see why I'm not well disposed to the place or their policies.
Bannination will welcome you in the beginning, then mock and taunt you until only the strong remain and survive.
And then those Persians had better watch out!
You'll get over it.
The links can be interesting, but the moderators are pillow-biting nancies who will shadowban you at the drop of a hat.
At least you aren't shadowbanned.
There's something to that, but I'd say that the majority of books are read once or twice at most so in that sense they're disposable. Of course there are reference books too, but how much of a market will they be? When Amazon tried introducing the Kindle 2 to college students they found it unsatisfactory as a way to read and refer to text books so that's probably not going to be a huge market.
On the truly disposable side, newspapers and magazines are frothing at the bit to get digital subscriptions on the iPad, but e-ink needs colour to make it a compelling choice. My bet is that these readers will find their niche in recreational novels, where the content is effectively disposable leading to a revenue stream based on sales of content, not hardware.
What Apple did was invert the normal rules by being first to market with a credible MP3 player and leveraging their extremely loyal base. It was a beautifully executed coup, but not one that Amazon or B&N are in a position to duplicate. They gave it a go, but now they're having to fall back on the tried and true Gillette model.
It doesn't matter to them if the profit on the reader is razor-thin (heh) or even negative, so long as people are buying overpriced e-books.
That talk page is full of them.
Either way, they'll probably blame it on the evil hackers.
If it isn't legal, it should be. A possible precedent would be terminals - either hardware or emulators - pretending to be VT100s.
Now that the US appears to be giving up on manned space exploration it's good to see other nations step up to the plate.
Two processors are used regardless of the licence. It just makes things easier from a hardware perspective to have one processor dedicated to the phone network functions and another to the UI and assorted programs.
I remember the Qt fun and games, yes. The LGPL will always be the *Library* GPL to me.
Fair enough, that's the way I understand the trade-offs too. I was just a little surprised to see no mention of the LGPL in your article and wondered if it was part of a sinister plot to deprecate the licence.
Any comments about the applicability of the LGPL? It used to be very popular in embedded systems.
In case anyone doesn't know, shadowbanning is where you can post and see your comments as normal, but nobody else sees them. Basically, you're screaming into the void - and if you're a donor you're paying for the privilege.
In other words, it's a rather childish type of fraud.
Yes I am shadowbanned on Fark, for the crime of replying to a comment which mentioned a rival site. I hope Slashdot can avoid that crap.