HAL 9000 on the Auction Block
pompous windbag writes "The Cinerama 160 degree lens used to both play and film the viewpoint of the famous paranoid processor. He's now up for sale on eBay, for the starting bid of just $150,000(USD).
This looks like the real deal, complete with letters of authenticity and some extra goodies like
"...an original '2001' movie program, a copy of the original script, two issues of American Cinematographer Magazines on the production of '2001' published in 1968, and the movie '2010' published in 1985. Also included is videotape showing how HAL 9000 originated and was used by Stanley Kubrick.' "
can you even send $150,000 through paypal?
Yes, you're paying the $150,000 for the camera lens. The HAL 9000 set is a reproduction.
Working Cray Supercomputer for sale
How much is listing it on eBay for $150,000 going to cost him in fees if no one buys it? I'm assuming of course that he didn't list it on a free-listing day, does anyonw know if there's been a free-listing day 3 or 4 days ago?
Bruce
Bruce Perens.
Should we wait till he cuts it in half again?
Was $300,000
I've always wondered this: did microsoft intentionally create MS+1 = NT?
Even for a homicidal cycloptic spaceship computer, I can't imagine any conceivable advantage to having red light shining out of your eye. Was the purpose of that ever explained in the film?
Ceci n'est pas une signature.
This is a scam. I saw it online before. How the crap did this make it to Slashdot. I swear dumber and dumber articles get through each day. Nothing to see here, move along.
Personally, I think he would.
I'm paraphrasing here, but Kubrick said something to the extent of "If you walk away from seeing 2001 without any questions, then we failed." - Kubrick's style was to ask questions.
Clarke, on the other hand, always answered most if not all of his questions.
I've read all the "2001" books, and seen most Kubrick films.
(All except the small ones made prior to "The Killing")
And IMHO, Kubrick is by far the greater artist of the two. Clarke not only 'answers' too many questions, he is a bit one-track. All the post-2001 books are really just rehashes of the same ideas.
(In fact, almost ALL his books are rehashes of the same ideas, from "Childhoods end" to "Rama" to "2001"..)
So.. I'd say: Yes, Stanley Kubrick would probably have something different to say. And it'd probably be more interesting too.
33,000 hits on that page at this point, against 0 bids placed... I think we got some kind of record