Slashdot Mirror


Flexible Sensors Make Robot Skin

Roland Piquepaille writes "In recent years, lots of efforts have been made to give robots the ability to hear and see. But what about the sense of touch? Unlike us, robots don't have sensitive skin. But this is about to change. By using organic, or plastic, field-effect transistors as pressure sensors deposited on a flexible material, researchers at the University of Tokyo have created an artificial skin which will give robots the sense of touch. The prototype has a density of 16 sensors per square centimeter, far from the 1,500 of our fingertips. When this density increases and when the problem of the reliability of this kind of transistors is solved, the researchers say this artificial skin will also be used for car seats or gym carpets. Expect to see them in four or five years. More details and a picture of a robotic hand using organic transistors as pressure sensors."

22 of 148 comments (clear)

  1. Fo real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    More real realdoll.

    *big smile*

    Oh yeah

    1. Re:Fo real by victor_the_cleaner · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's what I thought of first, the pr0n impact.

      Then of course during the first 'interface' with your new sensitive doll, it would remark... "is that all you got?"

  2. Prosthetics by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I haven't read the article yet, but my first thought when I read the blurb was whether or not this would have applications for prosthetics?

    One of the most difficult parts of rehabilitation for amputees, even with the most expensive and advanced prosthesis, is that the most sensitivity available nowadays is a highly generalied "touching something/not touching something" or a translation of general amounts of pressure (and thats only on the most advanced: most models have no sensors at all). If we could provide amputees with limbs that felt, albeit in a much reduced fashion, many behaviors that require positive feedback (i.e. to be able to adjust your movements based on what you feel in that limb) could become accesible for the disabled.

    --
    "Stumble before you crawl"
    1. Re:Prosthetics by Impeesa · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It could work, but other technology needs to catch up first. Fairly detailed sensors could be installed in current prosthetics, I'm sure, but the machine-nerve interface just doesn't carry enough data yet. It doesn't matter whether we know what that data means, since the brain can probably learn to interpret it on its own, but we just don't have the fine control over the interface that we would need. In related news, an article in this month's Discover (full text viewable to subscribers) discusses a lot of these limitations, although it comes at it from the angle of whether mind-reading (or controlling) computer chips are possible.

  3. Every time I sit down in my car... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Funny

    KITT: "You know, Mike, we need to talk about how you're doing on your diet."

  4. "Is it becoming clear to you yet?" by Sialagogue · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Look at yourself, standing there, cradling the new flesh I've given you. If it means nothing to you, why protect it?"

    "I... I am simply imitating the behavior of humans."

    "You're becoming more human all the time. . .Now you're learning how to lie."

    "My programming was not designed to process these sensations."

    "Then tear the skin from your limb as you would a defective circuit...Go ahead...! We won't stop you! Do it! Don't be tempted by flesh!"

    --
    The only acceptable defense of scientific results is to say that they were the product of the Scientific Method.
    1. Re:"Is it becoming clear to you yet?" by Sneeper · · Score: 3, Funny


      And thousands of slashdotters pause to fantasize about the Borg Queen. Sexiest. Villain. Ever.

    2. Re:"Is it becoming clear to you yet?" by pyrrhonist · · Score: 5, Funny
      And thousands of slashdotters pause to fantasize about the Borg Queen. Sexiest. Villain. Ever.

      Well, she gives good head anyway, but that's probably because hers is detachable.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  5. You know where the money is by Frac · · Score: 3, Funny

    Make the inflatable dolls play audio clips when certain sensors are touched.

    My parents would be so proud.

    1. Re:You know where the money is by cryms0n · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Hey that's sexual harrassment!"

      "Put your finger there again and lose it!"

      "Don't touch me, weirdo!"

      And, my favorite,

      "Just what do you think you're doing, Dave?"

  6. Roland Piquepaille writes nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative


    he just plaigarises other peoples content and sells it on his blog

    but if you add
    127.0.0.1 radio.weblogs.com
    127.0.0.1 blogads.com
    127.0.0.1 ww2.blogads.com
    127.0.0.1 ww3.blogads.com
    127.0.0.1 www.blogads.com

    to your hosts file, he and his revenue stream disappears !

  7. New Gillette Robo-Shave by koreth · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Unlike us, robots don't have sensitive skin.

    So they'll save lots of money on aftershave and electric razors.

    All hail our new cleanshaven robot masters.

    1. Re:New Gillette Robo-Shave by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then I guess you also don't understand cutting your hair and nails... yup, your average slashdotter!

      --
      Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
      Africus aut Europaeus?
  8. What's with the Piquepaille posts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Everybody complaining about Slashdot becoming Piquepaille's personal soapbox for plagiarisim seems to get instantly modded down. Is he a pseudonym for one of the Slashdot editors or something?

    Anyway, what is the robot ability up to now?

    * Has skin
    * Eats flies
    * Can transform into other robots
    * Walks on water

    It sounds like the plans are coming together nicely for overlord robots.

  9. Complaining Robots by A+Boy+and+His+Blob · · Score: 3, Informative

    Oh great, one more thing for Marvin to complain about.

    I think you ought to know I'm feeling very depressed, and my leg hurts too.

  10. Eeew I can see it now by aarku · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mom: Joey! Stop bouncing around in your seat!
    Joey: But Maaa!
    Back Seat: .... Please don't stop...

  11. I for one by lonesome+phreak · · Score: 3, Funny

    welcome our new golden skinned robotic overlords.

    Seriously, that picture kinda creeps me out.

    --
    Maybe we DID take the blue pill. You wouldn't remember anyway.
  12. Re:THE SENSOR-SENSATION GAP by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

    how does one overcome the sensor-sensation gap?

    In the case of a sex android one does not even bother trying, as it's only the sensations produced in the human componant that matter.

    All the android has be able to do is adeptly fake it, making it more of an android wife than an android girlfriend.

    KFG

  13. Why this is not going to help much + a better way by zytheran · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I started a Masters degree on this issue in the 1980's and it's sad to see the same *wrong* approach to touch still being applied if the end use is a robotic hand/finger. At the time MIT was doing work on this, as were a few other places, all with the wrong approach. Here's the problem:
    It's not the sensors or the density or how long they last or their accuracy or anything like that, even though these are real problems. The big killer problem is wiring. You get all these signals and at some point you need to get the wiring over joints that have to bend a real lot. And the more sensors you have the wires your typically going to have. Eventually you end up with bundles of wires and the simple fact is bundles of wires do not like being bent repeatedly, apart from which fingers need to be skinny to be useful and this is at odds with fat bundles of wires.

    One solution however is physically simple and was presented at a National robotics conference in Australia in 1990. In summary I proposed and had made a working 2D slice of finger that used only 4 sensors. A 3D finger tip would require about 9 sensors, and by finger tip I mean measuring the major contact, magnitude and direction anywhere beyond the joint. The method was based on normal engineering and had the 4 sensors buried into a compliant skin. An external force caused a reading on all 4 strain gauges. From this small amount of data a PC worked out the magnitude, position and direction of the applied force using data collected from earlier testing. As a 2D finger slice it could successfully follow an edge when attached to a robot arm. I can scan and email the paper (this was pre net days) if any researchers want to extend this work and come up with practical robotic fingers. Email me.
    Another solution is to put the smarts into the skin so only a "summary" signal needs to go back through the various joints. This couldn't be done in the 80's but could be now?

  14. Re:Why this is not going to help much + a better w by Animats · · Score: 3, Informative
    The problem is not that you can't do it. It's that the market is so dinky that tooling up to do it isn't worth it.

    It should be feasible to make integrated silicon strain gauge/amplifier/interface chips, embed them in a flexible printed circuit, and laminate them into a skin-like laminate with appropriate tough, soft, and hard layers. But the processes involved are all high-volume ones - it's hard to do this economically in small volume. And there's no market for a process that turns out big rolls of this stuff.

    There's a lot of stuff in robotics that's like that. Linear motors and laser scanners both cost about 20x what they should. because the volume is tiny. Even basic servomotos and servo amps cost 5x as much as they should, based on parts cost.

    It's getting better, though. More and more parts needed in robotics are becoming off the shelf. I run a DARPA Grand Challenge team, and over the last year, many of the components you need for that have become far more available.

  15. Finally! Anti-Ninja surfaces! Affair Detectors! by digital+photo · · Score: 3, Funny

    After decades of research, there is now the technology to defeat those wall clinging, ceiling hiding, floor light-footing ninjas!(and web slingers, kung fu masters, ballerinas, etc).

    Just apply the new "feel it" intelligent surface film to every surface inside and outside of your home!

    Know instantly by pattern recognition and fuzzy logic, when your loved one is cheating on you and know exactly on what table, floor, wall, or patio! You will know the exact time(s) and how many times your loved one has gotton the good vibration from your neighbor, your cook, your best friend... all this data can then be converted to full motion, surround sound video footage for personal review, use in court, and on a variety of daytime talk shows. (Video footage generation available when using "Feel It" intelligent films with "See It" intelligent films. Please consult your local informational technology contractor for proper installation procedures!)

    Know when that den of roaches comes out for their nightly snack attack on your pet's food and your early morning english muffins!

    Know when expensive vat grown ninjas are clamboring into your home to assasinate you for pissing off the wrong multi-national artificial intelligence!

    All this can be yours if you are willing to apply the new "feel it" intelligent surface sheets to each and every possible surface in your home.

    Coming Soon!

    "Know It" intelligent pleasure film for when you want to know who's faking it! Designed to carefully measure pressure, moisture, and hormones, this new wave technological material not only protects you from STD's, but also from fake orgasms, recurring genital warts, another lover's fluids, etc.... (note: use of "Know It" intelligent pleasure film may not be legal to use in all states. Please consult your local laws before purchase and/or use!)

  16. Re:God solved this problem with hair by uglyduckling · · Score: 4, Informative
    Utter rubbish.

    I'm a med student - I had to respond to this one. There are 6 types of tactile receptors, of which nerve endings attached to hairs are one. Hairs provide basic information about movement - the wind or your clothes moving past your skin etc.

    The tips of your fingers are hairless. That's obvious - look at them under a magnifying glass or microscope if you have one. Fine touch sensation is provided by Tactile Discs and Tactile Corpuscles located in the ("live") skin of the dermis. The skin is not made exclusively of "dead" cells, but of many layers, and the ("dead") epidermis at the surface is quite capable of transmitting movement down to these cells.

    You can check all of this out if you want.

    People have hair on their heads mainly for insulation (get a crew cut in the middle of winter if you want to prove this!) although I agree that hair on the head has a limited use in avoiding collisions. I suspect that subjective loss of sensation in the face after shaving is due to the trauma of having run a blade over your skin, and the stinging sensation from the damage to hair follicles.