Slashdot Mirror


Asterisk Open Source PBX 1.0 Release

An anonymous reader writes "Today at Astricon (the first Asterisk conference), Mark Spencer announced the release of version 1.0.0 of Asterisk. For those of you that don't know: Asterisk is a complete PBX in software. It runs on Linux and provides all of the features you would expect from a PBX and more. Asterisk does voice over IP in three protocols, and can interoperate with almost all standards-based telephony equipment using relatively inexpensive hardware. Asterisk users can be up and running, making phone calls in under an hour using the various guides found at the VoIP Wiki. Connectivity to the PSTN is provided by companies like VoicePulse, Nufone, Gafachi and VoipJet."

51 of 208 comments (clear)

  1. Enjoy your IAXy... by kasparov · · Score: 4, Funny
    Anonymous User...

    (Mark offered to give a free IAXy to the person who got this slashdot story posted) :-)

    --
    There's no place I can be, since I found Serenity.
    1. Re:Enjoy your IAXy... by TheMysteriousFuture · · Score: 5, Informative
      Here are some good asterisk resources.

      The Offical Asterisk IRC channel!
      irc.freenode.net
      #Asterisk

      Note: you must be registered and identified with NickServ to join the channel as we've had a lot of problems with spambots.
      To do so simply

      /msg nickserv register mypassword

      /msg nickserv identify mypassword
      then /join #asterisk


      Come on in and say hi!
      Some links

      The Wiki
      The Asterisk Documentation Project
      Andy's Getting Started With Asterisk Guide (it's written for a old version of asterisk, but still useful)
      ManxPower's site
      For some advanced examples see John Todd's site
      Also read all files in ./asterisk/doc after you download Asterisk.

      more links (look at the "Unnoficial Links")

      Mod me up! :)...

      --
      .sig
  2. Re:Asterisk? Linux? I'm so confused! by BitHive · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Berkeley Breathed would like a word with you about your username. Also, if you have to provide references for your jokes, you might want to reconsider how funny they are.

  3. Linux Journal did an article on Asterisk... by tcopeland · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...right here.

    It's a bit out of date - it suggests you check out the code from CVS - but lots of good info there nonetheless.

  4. Great for new businesses by erick99 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The features section of the website is certainly impressive. If I were starting a new business or, for some reason, had to get out of a current PBX contract, I would give this a try. Having worked in large companies with large PBX systems, the money saved would not be insignicant. I didn't see in the article or the features list if there was any sort of limit to the amount of phones that this would support. For example will it work with 400 employees? 4000? 40,000?

    -erick

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
    1. Re:Great for new businesses by Scott+Laird · · Score: 5, Informative

      It depends on your needs. There have been suggestions that some CLECs are using Asterisk internally, and there are certainly a ton of VoIP startups using it. The general impression that I get is that you don't want to run more then 100 simultaneous connections through a single Asterisk server. If you want more, then add more servers and share the load. If you're doing a lot of compression on the server, the number may drop below 100.

      Fortunately, Asterisk does a decent job of sharing information between multiple servers, but setting up a large multi-system PBX still isn't going to be trivial.

      If you're using VoIP phones (Cisco, Polycom, etc), then there's no real limit to how many employees you can service with a single server. If you're using analog phones, then you should probably limit yourself to around 4 T1s worth of phones per server.

  5. Re:Thanks! by mogorman · · Score: 2, Informative

    google is your friend.... in short its a phone system.

  6. Re:Thanks! by grifter7 · · Score: 4, Informative

    AC, meet my friend Google.

    (PBX = Private Branch Exchange)

    http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/P/PBX.html

  7. Re:Thanks! by boarder8925 · · Score: 5, Informative
    but wtf is a PBX?
    For you, and everyone else too lazy to use Google or Wikipedia ...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_branch_exchan ge
  8. Re:Thanks! by kernelfoobar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    PBX: Private Branch eXchange (private telephone switchboard)

    used in medium and large size businesses. It's like a LAN for phones. You can tell when a employee has an extentions number.

    --
    Here we go again!
  9. IP phone recommendations? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Any recommendations for IP (ethernet) phones to use with Asterisk? We've got Lucent/Avaya fones with power over ethernet (convenient) but the PBX backend is a proprietary piece of shite.

    Also, is LDAP supported in Asterisk?

    1. Re:IP phone recommendations? by Akai · · Score: 5, Informative

      By far my fav are Cisco 7960 (I haven't tried the 7970) the only problem is they need things like DNS entried and tftpservers to work optimally.

      For lower-cost alternatives, I really like the SNOM phones. I've used an snom 200 for quite a while and it's a very nice phone.

      I also have a Pulver WiSIP which is nice but not exactly featureful, and the audio quality goes down when WEP is used.

      For ATA's the SIPura, and the Linksys models there of ($50 or so) are a good bet, and the dirt-cheap Grandstreams work okay too.

      Use the voip wiki to find optimal phone and sip.conf configs for a bunch of different phones.

      --
      Please send all UCE to scally@devolution.com so I can f
    2. Re:IP phone recommendations? by ldspartan · · Score: 4, Informative

      In my apartment, I've got a Cisco 7960 and Budgetone 100 both connected to * via SIP. They're at opposite ends of the cost spectrum, the 7960 being about $400 MSRP and the BT about $100. Both work fine.

      See http://www.voip-info.org/ for more.

      --
      Phil

    3. Re:IP phone recommendations? by Scott+Laird · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Polycom IP300/IP500/IP600 line seems to be the best combination of price and performance right now, at least for a business environment. You can get cheap phones (the Grandstream Budgetone is around $70), but they're cheap and missing some features.

      Asterisk doesn't have native LDAP support, but it's not very hard to write a script that produces a set of Asterisk config files out of LDAP data. With a bit more work, you could script Asterisk to do LDAP lookups, but it'll take too much work to be worth it for small (100 users) sites.

    4. Re:IP phone recommendations? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Asterisk doesn't have native LDAP support, but it's not very hard to write a script that produces a set of Asterisk config files out of LDAP data. With a bit more work, you could script Asterisk to do LDAP lookups, but it'll take too much work to be worth it for small (100 users) sites.

      With LDAP you can get interesting stuff like injecting voicemails to IMAP mailboxes, having group extensions (like helpdesk) inject voicemail to group mailboxes, etc..

      I'm just thinking how neat it would be to have a voicemail password be dtmf(lc($passplain)) so you'd have single signon ;)

    5. Re:IP phone recommendations? by Scott+Laird · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, Asterisk already lets you send voicemail via email, with the message attached as a WAV file. It can suck its VM config out of MySQL or Postgres, or it can use text files. It'll also send mail to a pager email address; I get a SMS message on my cell phone whenever I get new voicemail at home. The message includes the caller ID information as well, which makes it a snap to return calls.

      There's a patch out there somewhere to tie Asterisk into Request Tracker. Done properly, you could build a really interesting support phone system--it'd record calls, stick them into the ticket queue as needed, and give you a great way to keep track of who's bugging you the most.

    6. Re:IP phone recommendations? by Akai · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are un-locked linksys Sipura's out there, look for -NA on the model # PAP2-NA and RT31P2-NA are the two models available according to VoIP Wiki

      --
      Please send all UCE to scally@devolution.com so I can f
  10. Re:Slashdot News by erick99 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    As far as I can tell from the article and their website, this software is free so I don't see how this is advertising. At least not in the traditional sense of advertising to make money from selling a product or service.

    Don't you think you are being a bit hypocritical complaining about advertising when you are trolling for referrals for your free iPod? Now that is an example of advertising for a profit. If the shoe fits....

    -erick

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
  11. Asterisk... by juuri · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...is quite nice and easy to get going with a cheap $40 FXO card. With that and a decently powered machine you can easily replace your home answering service or machine with something a bit more complex. As great as Asterisk is though it definitely is a 1.0 product, hopefully now that the functionality has stabilized somewhat, more work will be put into rearing the myriad of control files into something more managable and some work will be put into better troubleshooting tools. Odd or weird problems can be a real PITA to diagnose on your Asterisk setup.

    My dialplan (which works all but the analog portion 100% of the time) is that a call comes in -> rings the analog line a few times -> asterisk then picks up and gives the user a menu, from there one can pick my sip client or my girlfriend's or a global that rings the analog line and the sip clients at the same time. In case of no answer voicemail then picks up and fires off an email to us containing the message. Eventually I hope to have it sharing functionality with some friends in different states so we can all have free local dial-ins for family and friends who are scattered.

    --
    --- I do not moderate.
    1. Re:Asterisk... by bastion_xx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Agreed. There was a lot of "discussion" when the 1.0-stable and 1.0RC1 branches were put in place... then abandoned in favor of HEAD.

      Hopefully the discipline is in place to keep bug fixes on the 1.0 branch while new features can be put into HEAD or another branch completely.

      Happy * user in 3 continents, 1 Carribean island, and at home too!

    2. Re:Asterisk... by walt-sjc · · Score: 2, Informative
      I think most of the problems are due to quality of the cards, varying quality of phone lines, quality of the DSP code, etc. CallerID has been quite unreliable (external callerID devices work every time.) The stock single FXO card is just a winmodem at heart - the quality of the telco interface portion is suspect. Other FXO devices (channel bank, SIP FXO boxes, etc) may have better luck on questionable lines.

      In addition, interupt conflicts are a constant plague for many newcommers. The X100P generates HUGE ammounts of interrupts:

      cat /proc/interrupts
      CPU0
      0: 320654688 XT-PIC timer
      1: 172 XT-PIC keyboard
      2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
      5: 3206489995 XT-PIC wcfxo
      7: 3207343890 XT-PIC wcfxo
      8: 4 XT-PIC rtc
      10: 19229650 XT-PIC eth0
      11: 16825874 XT-PIC aic7xxx, eth1
      NMI: 0
      LOC: 320657060
      ERR: 363715
      MIS: 0

      Many people are still looking for a more affordable (but still good quality) FXO / FXS card with a higher port density. While you can get a used channel bank for not too much on ebay, new pricing is out of control ($500 for the T1 interface, $2K+ for the CB.) It should be possible to do a 4x12 card for under $1K (which is large enough for 90% of small businesses and home use) especially considering that you can get a 4x12 Voice Pro for about $500. Probably need to make them in China to keep the price down though... While you can use low-end SIP phones, they tend to suck.

  12. Mirrors by lowlands · · Score: 3, Informative

    Mirrors can be found at http://asterisk.paperwork.com

  13. Re:ads by ari_j · · Score: 3, Funny

    echo '0.0.0.0 ads.osdn.com' | cat >> /etc/hosts

    Here's the problem with the new generation of Unix users - they think that, just because Unix is a collection of small utilities that can be used to achieve great results, they must utilize as many tools as possible in solving the simplest problems.

    echo '0.0.0.0 ads.osdn.com' >> /etc/hosts

  14. best and worst of open source by MrShoop · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Asterisk exemplifies the best and worst elements of an open source project. The best being this is an awesomely powerful, infinitely configurable robust piece of software that is free and can replace otherwise extremely expensive proprietary systems. It is power to the masses in that a small company can have a comparable phone system to a big corporation that spends tens of thousands of dollars.

    The worst is that there is a very steep learning curve. Configuration of both hardware and software is complex. While the documentation is thorough, it is not oriented towards the first time set-up.

    Taken as a whole, though the good outweighs the bad, and it is worth investing in learning about it. This is great package. Tanks to the people who have been working on it, esp Mark at Digium.

    1. Re:best and worst of open source by Scott+Laird · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In many ways, Asterisk reminds me of Sendmail, circa 1996 or so. It's complex, it's sort of hard to configure (although Asterisk doesn't use line noise for config files, unlike Sendmail), but it's insanely flexible. In the early and mid 90s, you needed the flexibility, because email standards were in flux. SMTP was common, but so was UUCP and BITNET and a handful of other protocols. Gateways into non-RFC822 systems were all over the place. You needed a mail program that could handle all sorts of weird issues or you'd never be able to hack together a config that could handle your weird mail needs.

      Asterisk is similar. It's complex because it's designed to be able to tie together clumps of incompatible phone systems and act in all sorts of ways that the programmers didn't really intend. You can use it as a pure VoIP system, a gateway between different VoIP systems, a plain PBX with analog phones, a VoIP extension for an existing PBX, a voice-mail system for a PBX, a dialer for a call center, or a centrex-style virtual PBX for multiple companies. It's flexible enough to let you configure it to be any of these and a thousand other things. And today, we need the flexibility because we have so many weird little phone systems that we need to tie together.

      For email, things eventually changed. SMTP is king, and RFC 822 is the gold standard for email formats. Modern mailers are a lot less complex because they *CAN* be. Will the future hold something similar for telephone service? Who knows. Check back in a decade, but for now, use Asterisk.

  15. cheap, turnkey asterisk systems? by timothy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know at least one technically skilled computer programmer type (ruling me out on two counts) who had a lot of pain setting up asterics. (Brian will remain completely anonymous.)

    Considering the ludicrous (low) prices for which one can buy a complete system far-more-than-capable of running asterics, the relatively cheap price of the phone interfaces, etc, it seems like a plentifully adequate Asterics box could be made for a lot less than $500, and perhaps sold for that amount (just one or two lines, more could cost more). This isn't *dirt* cheap like future, hypothetical home PBX appliances ought to be from Linksys and similar companies, but considering you can also use it as a home server and other things on the side, strikes me as at least a plausible, reasonable price to aim for.

    Has anyone done this? Does anyone sell a shoe-box PBX for a few hundred dollars that can be accessed via web, so new voice messages and menus can be dropped in via clicky-clicky drop-down menus?

    On this front, Isaac from MythTV and Marc from Asterics should get together and forge an unholy alliance, integrating two home-automation tasks in a nice, non-monolithic, package. I noticed that MythTV has *some* kind of new addition involving phones, but I have not read the linked bits yet ;)

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:cheap, turnkey asterisk systems? by Dare+nMc · · Score: 2, Informative
  16. I just had a funny thought.. by Havokmon · · Score: 2, Funny
    As I clicked on the Asterisk link, I imagined a GNU HURD stampeding across the internet to the Asterisk server.

    What have we become?!

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  17. Re:Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's like a PBJ, but XTREME!!!

  18. New Marketing Slogan... by GypC · · Score: 4, Funny
    Asterisk 1, because when it comes to your job, you only have one "ass-to-risk"

    OK, that was bad.

  19. It's GPLed, anyways by Scott+Laird · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ignoring the free iPod issue, this is free software (GPL, even) that we're talking about. It's not v1.0 of some random commercial program. It's v1.0 of the premier Linux VoIP package. That makes it news.

    1. Re:It's GPLed, anyways by jjhall · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly. I have a free link in my sig too. That doesn't make any difference to the point of my post, or the OP's point.

      I'm actually using Asterisk for my phone system at home, and it is amazing what you can do with it. I'm running a CVS version from about 2 months ago, and had been updating it monthly up until my last update. Even running a development "non-stable" version I hardly have any issues at all. And each time I did, the people in the IRC channel have been very helpful, and most every time a CVS update has resolved my troubles.

      With all the open-source talk these days, and all of the great sounding projects that end up being vaporware, a 1.0 release of such a large-scale project is truely news. It may sound like a PR advertisement, but when that is a very accurate description of the product, then what is the problem? As the saying goes, if the shoe fits....

  20. Re:ads by JabberWokky · · Score: 4, Funny
    Actually, they should use:

    printf "%s %s %s\n" $( echo '0.0.0.0 ads.osdn.com' | cat | rev | nl | head -5 | sed 's/Eris/Bob/g' | awk '{ print $2 " " $3 }' | rev | nl ) |cut -c3- >> /etc/hosts

    --
    Evan "If it's worth doing, it's worth overdoing"

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  21. Asterisk is great! by SendBot · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've just barely started playing with it, but it's pretty easy to use once you get the hang of it. It even comes with prerecorded messages such as "all members of our household are currently dealing with telemarketers", "somethings *terribly* wrong", and one that's just angry monkeys screaming for 20 seconds.

    Here are some great resources for getting started:
    http://www.digium.com/handbook-draft.pdf

    and a good soft phone (x-lite) at http://www.xten.com/

    1. Re:Asterisk is great! by Havokmon · · Score: 3, Funny
      and one that's just angry monkeys screaming for 20 seconds.

      Oh sorry, I was trying to set the outgoing message, but the kids had just come home from school.

      Thanks, I'll fix that.

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  22. We are running it by codepunk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We have been running it for quite some time to handle our order status system. We programmed a python interface to our oracle database, greatest thing since sliced bread. Very flexible system with alot of possibilities.

    --


    Got Code?
  23. Music on hold (for any PBX) by SnakeStu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not that most will care, but I first heard about Asterisk via the HTTP_REFERER data in the Web server logs for the OMR, which was apparently referenced as a place to get no-cost, pre-licensed (open licensed) on-hold music.

    Now that the OMR has been shut down, the links to those songs are available in an XML dump of the music database that can be found on freality.org or my own site.

  24. Long time user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have been using Asterisk for well over a year, it has replaced the cisco call manager for my applications.

    It has provided robust functionality, and many features that would be cost prohibitive to implement from other vendors.

    If your looking to get into voice over IP on a scale larger than a single Vonage accout, or even want to have full pbx facilities for home..this is the way to go.

    Just my 2 cents
    -AC-

  25. not too far out: email by phone by timothy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Someone (not me! not me! the monkeys!) should connect asterics with festival, an audio compression program, and a mail agent.

    Would be good to call one's landline (connected to an asterics box) and be given options like "press 7 to hear email."

    Would be annoying to hear everything, perhaps (and too slow, too), but an option like "play the first 10 words, then prompt for more, or to skip to the next message" would make it bearable.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:not too far out: email by phone by NinjaPablo · · Score: 2, Funny

      That'd be great. I could call in and hear festival stumble thru all the spam I have. "horse china The president today announced a new policy. Low cost viagra Can you maintain 4 hours episilon romeo episilon charley tango india oscar november?"

      --
      SmashTech - No smashing of tech involved
  26. Re:Just had this chat with my CIO pal.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or you could fork out 40 buck and get a card to interface to the pstn, close off your sytem with a firewall.

    You could also install a 4port T1 card, order up a T1 from your local Telco provider, install a few channel banks and have a traditional PBX saving thousands and thousands of dollars without ever exposing yourself to script kiddies.

  27. MythPhone by timothy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here's the link (from the MythTV site) for MythPhone. It's for making SIP calls, not intended for integration with a POTS service as far as I can see, but conceptually it could be a good front end for calls made over asterics (or any landline, if tied into one). That would lose the fancy picture stuff, but would turn a MythTV computer into a big, fancy phone. Beldar Conhead plastic face mold not included.

    "Unfortunately big complex systems require some idea of what you are doing. Services are available to those who don't understand telephony. But usually they want to get paid for their time. You sound like you expected something like this to be just configure, make, make install and it's up and running."

    Actually, I'd like it to be even simpler than "configure,make, make install," but I don't *expect* it -- at least, not magically. The reason I suggest a turnkey appliance is because such a thing can encapsulate many hours of the time you mention in a form that's easily reproducable at low marginal cost, and the cost of that time can be amortized over many units' worth of hardware -- the same way interface-design and programming time that go into things like wireless appliance of various kinds can.

    Re: complexity / money for time, the same could be said (and has been) about all kinds of complex systems which have in the end been simplified with sufficient skill to make them useful *without* a big learning curve. I want my cake and to eat it too, Yes, but so does everyone who drives a car that doesn't need to be manually cranked, rides a ski-lift, or uses central heating instead of stoking a coal furnace (etc). There will always be a market (in money and attention span) for the hardcore, bare-metal approach to just about anything, but that doesn't mean simplifications and commoditization in general are bad.

    Somewhat related example: video compression. Using dvd::rip, I have squashed a few DVDs into hard-drive friendly smaller sizes, so I can carry some favorite films on my laptop. dvd::rip is itself a front-end meant to be simpler and friendlier than using the underlying programs it connects, but it's still not all that user friendly, at least to klutzes like me :) Got it working, eventually, Yes, but QuickRip (sadly discontinued) does a good-enough job with a shallower learning curve. Tradeoffs are everywhere, and there's one.

    Cheers,

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  28. Re:Screen shots? by bytesmythe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here's a pic of the system in action.

    --
    bytesmythe
    Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
    -- Scott Meyer
  29. We use it! by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Informative

    We use Asterisk where I work -- about 30 Zultys ZIP 4X4 phones connected to a dual Xeon server with a Digium ISDN adaptor card (4 x E1 spans). One span is used to connect to the outside world (the full 30 lines; was just 12) and another connects to our "old" Siemens HiPath exchange.

    We did have a problem with call quality which seemed to be related to recording calls; it turned out that it was due to having far too many files in the recording directory, and once we had that sorted, it was clear as a bell again.

    My boss has even set up an Asterisk server at home. I haven't, but I've a spare machine I might use for the job if I can scrounge a spare IP phone. I'm not using a softphone -- we tested every one we could get the source for and one we couldn't, and they were all lousy for one reason or another.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  30. This is pretty cool stuff by multiplexo · · Score: 3, Interesting
    PBXs are expensive chunks of hardware, of course they're also pretty damned reliable, but for someone who isn't running a hospital switchboard or 911 call center this is a neat piece of software. I wonder if you could use this to set up some kind of free VoIP P2P phone network. You would have users who had an extra landline installed with long distance and 900 service blocked. They would then advertise this service on the net through the P2P network. If you wanted to call someone in the 425 area code who didn't have an IP phone you'd get on your IP connection, find someone with a system connected to a phone line in 425 and connect to their system. The phone number is dialed and the call is connected. It would cost 20 bucks or so for that extra landline but given that a lot of people are willing to make small sacrifices for collective projects, such as sharing their 802.11 access points, this might work. Or I might be on crack.

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  31. Tad of Trivia by XaXXon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mark Spencer (the guy who does asterisk), is also the original author of Gaim, and Cheops (nifty network tool).

    Anyways, that's it.. I knew him when we were both freshmen in college at Auburn.. He had ethernet in his room and I didn't, so my computer lived in his room most of that year..

    Haven't talked to him in years.. so if you're reading this Mark -- HEY!!

    --Zac

  32. Reliability? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm about to move into a new office, fed by both DSL and cablemodem (for 99.9999% uptime = 30s:y downtime). Has your use of Asterisk and its PSTN connection been reliable enough that your company can depend on it? What should keep me waiting for the next generation?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  33. We run our office using Asterisk by Ocelot+Wreak · · Score: 3, Informative
    We love it and run our office using Asterisk!

    Only odd thing we had to correct was switching off the Linux screensaver, as it was causing voice quality to occasionally stutter under high network traffic volume.

    Support Hint: an office PBX is a mission-critical system for a commercial business. You can't run it on an old piece of leftover trash! You need to put it on a high quality 1U server racked in your air conditioned computer room behind a secure door where the night cleaner can't plug his vacuun cleaner into your power bar!

    You also have to ensure it's properly backed up to off site tape/CD-ROM storage, and that the disk is RAID so that it can be QUICKLY restored when the disk fails.

    Anything less than this level of proper support means your ass is grass when something bad happens and the office comes to a screeching halt!

    You have been warned.

    Ocelot Wreak

    --
    "I figure you're here 'cause you need some whacko who's willing to stick his finger in the fan. So who are we helping?
  34. Re:Questions from a VOIP newbie by ModMeFlamebait · · Score: 4, Informative
    VOIP intrigues me, but being a newbie at this, I still get a little dizzy by all of this. So perhaps if someone can enlighten me. :)

    Ok so I install this thing on a Linux server. Then what? How do I make calls to say, someone in New York from LA? And who would I have to pay still? No one?


    You set up Asterisk servers in NY and LA and make them communicate (hint: IAX2 rocks). Now you pay for net connectivity for both servers and that's about it. If you want a normal phone number attached to your Asterisk server, you need to sign up with a VOIP provider (there are plenty of them in the US, I wish there was at least one here...) - check the Asterisk Wiki (link in the summary), there's a list somewhere.

    Also, how would I interface my phone with this thing? Would I need to get a VOIP phone?

    You can use:
    • a VOIP phone (just about any SIP/H.323/MGCP phone you fancy although some don't work with Asterisk) for about $70-$500 (from Grandstream to Cisco)
    • an ATA (analog telephone adapter, IIRC) which costs a little below $100 per port (check out IAXy and the Sipura gear) - it's a device to plug in your analog phone(s) which then lets it communicate via VOIP
    • a TDM400P card by Digium with an FXS module (1-4 on a single card) - you plug in an analog phone and it works with Asterisk
    • a softphone (X-Lite for example) but it feels somewhat weird
    If you want PSTN (public phone network) connectivity, you need either a VOIP provider account or a FXO interface card (check out X100P and TDM400P with FXO modules on Digium site).

    For a home installation I think I'd recommend a Sipura SPA-3000
    --
    Pavlov. Does this name ring a bell?
  35. We use it successfully by tarsi210 · · Score: 2, Informative



    My hosting business, Binhost Technologies, uses Asterisk behind its IAX/SIP Origination and Termination and wholesale VOIP operations. It works well -- the price is right and the features are many. Most phones work if they speak SIP, IAX, or H.323 and the system comes configured from the start in a pretty usable state.

    A few things we've found out: The scripting system is a bit of a learning curve. Also, the configurations are one of those Jenga configs -- breathe too hard and it falls down. You have to be really, really careful when messing with the configs because one place can easily mess up another thing. But once you get a good, working config, it just works.

    Processor usage is reasonable, too. A P-266 would do well for a couple of lines and maybe up to 10. After that you'll want a bit more horse.

    </plug>

  36. Re:Cheap FXS PCI card? by pwinkeler · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have one of those TDM400 cards populated with 3 FXS modules. Each module is wired into my house's pre-existing phone wiring and drives anywhere from 2 to 4 phones. There is no issue with DSPs running out of steam; you can still only have one conversation on the party line that makes up that set of phones. It turns out the limitation is more the amount of loop current you can push through the line drivers before they fry.
    Been running this config for months with great success.

    Now if only I could teach my wife and daughters the concept of extensions and the trick of transferring a call, I'd be one happy camper indeed

    --
    PaulW, IT Consultant