Slashdot Mirror


Spysats Keeping Watch on the U.S.

Anonymous And Slightly Nervous Coward writes "USA Today is carrying an AP story that claims three years' worth of domestic satellite surveillance courtesy of a DoD agecy called the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. Their work includes getting cooperation from entities pointing cameras onto private property such as hotels (all you HOPE and Defcon attendees, please wave for the camera). The agency seems to be taking the aw-shucks line on what they know and to what extent they evaluate the data they get, but it's clear that their mandate is seriously overpowering the oversight structures that would normally be watching it."

30 of 304 comments (clear)

  1. nothing new by BWJones · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Spysats" have always watched the U.S. starting with the very first Corona flights going on to the KH series from the 60's until the latest KH-12/13 Improved Crystal series. This is absolutely nothing new with organizations like the National Geospatial-Intelligence agency, that National Reconnaissance Office, the National Imaging and Mapping Agency and CIA having long standing contracts and plans to surveil regions within the boundaries of the U.S..

    When I was the subject of a recruiting effort in college for an un-named agency one of the things we discussed was merging of data modalities that would be far more powerful than capabilities then in place with the SR-71. These modalities were developed in urban areas within the U.S. such as Los Angeles and New York and a most public example was that one could see directly the collection of these data here in Salt Lake City at the last winter Olympics. Overflights of both aircraft and satellites to capture visual data, background radiation readings and other data were used in urban planning for placement of services, sniper teams, counter sniper teams and other responders. Teams were scouring this town taking images for overlay onto satellite data to build 3D models for all sorts of planning, so, yeah this is nothing new.

    What I am surprised at is how little folks know about the geospatial imaging community. It is a huge growth industry and the software that I currently use has been cobbled together from three different sources that most commonly runs on a variety of platforms from Solaris, to IRIX to Linux and Windows. I would love to see some of the code recompiled to run on OS X as some of the first code for geospatial imaging I ever saw ran on NeXTstep, not to mention that OS X is an ideal OS for this community. PCIGeomatics, ESRI, RSI etc..... are you listening?

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:nothing new by inKubus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      GIS is amazing stuff. There are a number of great trade publications that can be had for free.

      Here you can subscribe to a few for free.

      Makes great bathroom reading material. Where this stuff really begins to shine is melding of a bunch of data into a 3-d model, as you've said. Take a aerial photo of a street, add other ground photos with accurate location metadata and a standard map for wireframing.

      Then take a live video feed from a known point (or multiple points) and you can accurately transpose any movement onto a 3-d model for accurate viewing at any angle. Sort of like that fake first down line they have on football.

      Multiply it by every camera at every hotel, etc, instantly accessable by unique URL and you have an "Enemy of the State" scenario actually becoming possible. That's the road this stuff is all headed. I think it will be wonderful for security and marketing but I don't really see any useful characteristics for the common man, besides navigation. I could be wrong however.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    2. Re:nothing new by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
      > Take a aerial photo of a street, add other ground photos with accurate location metadata and a standard map for wireframing.
      > Then take a live video feed from a known point (or multiple points) and you can accurately transpose any movement onto a 3-d model for accurate viewing at any angle. Sort of like that fake first down line they have on football.
      > Multiply it by every camera at every hotel, etc, instantly accessable by unique URL and you have an "Enemy of the State" scenario actually becoming possible. That's the road this stuff is all headed. I think it will be wonderful for security and marketing but I don't really see any useful characteristics for the common man, besides navigation. I could be wrong however.

      You typed the word "navigation". Was that some sort of newfangled abbreviation or typo for "best massively-multiplayer online first-person shooter evah?" :)

    3. Re:nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sorry to Nitpick... The National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) is the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA). They just got the new name late last year. For those who really care, this agency used to be known as the Defence Mapping Agency prior to 1996.

  2. Nothing to see by WPIDalamar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Weird... first 3 times I tried to load this story, I saw
    "Nothing for you to see here. Please move along."

    with no story.

    Conspiracy? I think so.

  3. That's fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the information here is so aw-shucks and harmless, then getting it released to the public under the FOIA should be easy. That way we can all benefit from it.

    1. Re:That's fine. by John+Murdoch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In this day and age, I think it is a good thing that the government in general, and the military (especially the National Guard) in particular, has mapped the locations of plants that produce particularly toxic gases. In the event of a catastrophe, merging the geo-spatial data with up-to-date information from the National Weather Service would be crucial to determining dispersal patterns and what populations would be affected. ("Affected" in the hazmat industry usually means "killed.")

      Similarly, I think it would extremely useful for the government to identify the locations of, and easiest access to, where transcontinental fiber-optic links cross the Mississippi River.

      I can think of no good reason for Joe Public to know--at the detail of lat/lon--that kind of information. Because Joe Public might just be thinking about mischief, and knowing that kind of information might give him all the help he needed.

      What the military is doing is a good thing
      They're capturing geo-spatial data. That's geography--where stuff is located. They're looking at stuff that the USGS is not looking at (the USGS looks for polling places, churches, schools, and radio towers--they do not identify or catalog hazmat locations or high-voltage power lines). That makes a lot of sense to me--somebody should be looking at this.

      The article? Note the source: the Federation of American Scientists. They're generally regarded as a left wing group that is deeply suspicious of the military. Note the tenor of the comments from the one source in the article: deeply suspicious of the military--to the point of thinking that geo-spatial mapping could be used for personal surveillance. Um, not.

      In sum, I think the FAS is getting lathered up over a misunderstanding of what the program is doing. Not every small Defense department project is a secret conspiracy.

      ...Unless, of course, they're verifying the information by flying around in Little Black Helicopters. 8-)

  4. they laughed at me by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Funny

    when I put tinfoil all over the roof of my house... but who's laughing now?

  5. duh by Necron69 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Repeat after me: "You have no right to privacy in public." (especially when you are outdoors)

    Seriously, which three of you didn't already think the goverment was doing this?

    - Necron69

    1. Re:duh by garcia · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Repeat after me: "You have no right to privacy in public." (especially when you are outdoors)

      Slippery slope. Yeah, we have "no right" to privacy in public. Yeah, we know that the government and Major League Baseball have been spying on us for years from the eyes in the skies... What I want to know is what we are doing to stop them from continuing their infiltration into our personal lives that we live behind closed doors.

    2. Re:duh by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Funny

      What I want to know is what we are doing to stop them from continuing their infiltration into our personal lives that we live behind closed doors.

      There are major chains of stores operating under names such as "Home Depot" and "Lowes" that carry state-of-the-art camera blocking devices such as roofing tiles and window shades...

    3. Re:duh by sevinkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      What I want to know is what we are doing to stop them from continuing their infiltration into our personal lives that we live behind closed doors.

      Something tells me it's not voting republican :)

      (disclaimer: joke about marriage amendment... not trying troll)

    4. Re:duh by randyflood · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Um, But there is this law that says that the Defense Department is not allowed to spy on Us Citizens on US soil... I'm not saying that we should have a *right* to privacy in public. But, at the same time, why should we pay our tax dollars to have the military spy on US citicens, when they could be looking for terrorists?

      We carefully create intelligence oversight rules because we want to be sure that the military doesn't abuse its power to conduct intelligence operations against US citizens. Remember, that we entrust the governement with power and authority to conduct these operations for specific purposes. It may very well be that in this case the power is not being abused at all. However, we should always carefully scrutinize these kind of issues. It is better to be safe than sorry...

      --
      Randy.Flood@RHCE2B.COM
    5. Re:duh by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The key difference here is they got involved *AFTER* the attacks reached a certain level. Not before.

      And don't forgot all the extra manpower didn't do squat. All the roadblocks, inconvenience, and hassle imposed on everybody didn't catch the snipers. They were caught because a CITIZEN noticed something unusual at the rest stop in MD and reported it to the proper authorities. Normal disclosure of suspect vehicle description was all that ended up being required.

      And yes I live in Fairfax


      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  6. The answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
  7. For all you conspiracy theorists... by Aceto3for5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is basically The Sims for the NSA.

    Next thing you know you'll feel compelled to take a swim, only later you'll notice the ladder has been removed...

  8. NIMAR? by andy1307 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency used to be called the National imagery and mapping agency reston. The just changed the name of the agency some time in the last 6 months. I work very close to this agency in Northern Virginia. Before 9/11, you couldn't distinguish this building from any other office block. Post 9/11, there are armed guards and security checkpoints.

  9. Re:Perfectly Justified by udowish · · Score: 4, Funny

    If they want to watch me run around in my underwear so be it, I however, am not responsible for any cost incurred for couseling or psychiatric care :)

    --
    when in doubt press enter and we'll figure it out later..
  10. Don't see much threat to privacy here... by RCulpepper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mapquest and Terraserver et al have been offering up USGS satellite photos for years. What they're proposing to do here is not a more intensive form of surveillance, but a more complete job of mapping. All the information retreived by this system, AFAIK, would just be used to construct, say, 3D models of public buildings and cities, all of which information is easily available to the average pedestrian.

    --
    Always a godfather; never a god. -Gore Vidal
  11. Re:Not worried about this.... by drudd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You should care because the definition of what you should and shouldn't be doing can always be changed.

    Doug

    --
    Venn ist das nurnstuck git und Slotermeyer? Ya! Beigerhund das oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
  12. Re:Not worried about this.... by Frennzy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    not doing anything I shouldn't be doing, nor going anywhere I shouldn't be going


    According to YOU you're not. What happens when the government decides differently? What if going to an AA meeting is suddenly grounds for a background check, and then that information is suddenly available to your employer, who doesn't want any 'freakin' alcoholics' on the payroll?

    Or what about attending that civil-rights protest? Or the million man march? Or your wife/girlfriend/daughter going to an abortion clinic? See what I mean? Just assuming you aren't doing anything wrong doesn't mean that the gov can't decide otherwise.
  13. Here's why I care by DanielMarkham · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I understand that when I am in a public venue I have no right to privacy. I think everybody understands that.

    But what bothers me is that I am losing my anonynimity. The founding fathers never thought this one through, because there were no such things as databases that could keep images of all public spaces, faces, and events and allow cross-checking. That bothers me. If I decide to go down to the visit some local political nut-job to hear what they have to say, I don't expect to be catalogued and cross-referenced, even though I am performing a public act.

    No, I have nothing to hide. And yes, I understand that everybody is nice and the government is here to help me. But last I checked, our system of government in the USA was not built upon "Aw Shucks", but a system of checks and balances that assumed that power corrupts. We seem to be forgetting this somehow.

    1. Re:Here's why I care by Sheepdot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I understand that when I am in a public venue I have no right to privacy. I think everybody understands that.

      I don't.

      I don't understand what it is about the ninth amendment that the US Government fails to comprehend. I have a right to privacy. I would *hope* that would mean that I have a right to not have any identifying information stored in a public record if I did not desire such.

      If they suspect me of a crime, then by God, they should charge me with one. Not follow me around till I forget to signal when making a left turn. Speaking of which, why the hell do the ninth and tenth amendments never get mentioned and are repeatedly ignored? Ambiguity? What sane person could possibly imagine having your name in any database without his or her knowledge would not be a violation of their privacy?

  14. Might be a nice time to mention... by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Informative
    ...some of the ways we benefit from the work of the NGA:

    National Map (National Map Viewer)

    (and the somewhat related National Atlas)

  15. Whose watching them? by eseiat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the article the following quotes appear: The agency is not interested in information on U.S. citizens, stresses Americas office director Bert Beaulieu. "We couldn't care less about individuals and people and companies," he said. But that's not good enough for secrecy expert Steven Aftergood, who oversees a project on government secrecy for the Federation of American Scientists. "What it all boils down to is 'Trust us. Our intentions are good,'" he said. Considering my trust of the "good intentions" of spy satellite division of the government isn't exactly at a stellar magnitude, I want to know who is overseeing this group? Are there any regulations on this group and if so, who creates those? I'm not concerned due to any paranoia, I just want to know how much authority this group really has.

  16. Re:Not worried about this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Its a sad commentary on the ignorance of Americans that you have to explain why Stalinist surveillence is dangerous...

  17. Re:Put it to good use by IceWing_mk1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, actually there's starting to be precedent against high-tech surveillance technologies being employed in an invasive manner. A few months back, there was a case brought where a guy who was growing certain types of plants in his attic via the use of sun lamps was caught when a local LEO decided to scan the residence at night with a thermal imaging device. After the arrest of the grower, said grower brought suit, claiming it was a warrantless search, therefore inadmissible. The case went up the legal ladder to the Supreme Court, who decided that indeed, the use of the thermal imaging device violated the 4th Amendment Right's (Protection from Unlawful Search and Seizure) of the grower. Then, they turned around and said that aerial surveillance didn't need any such warrant. I'm not going to try and figure out the following, "In his discussion of the effect of the evolution of technology on privacy rights, Justice Scalia stated that technology enabling human flight has uncovered portions of the house and its curtilage that once were private. But, he held, the Kyllo case had to confront the limits on the power of technology to shrink the realm of guaranteed privacy." So, somehow, the technology of a thermal imaging device breaks some line of technology which would allow for unauthorized observation into a person's home, and therefore requires a warrant, while a radio control helicopter with a wireless camera onboard, as it would constitute aerial surveillence, doesn't. Sometimes, I think that George, Tom and the rest of the gang must be spinning in their graves.

  18. tinfoil hat by 5m477m4n · · Score: 4, Funny

    Looks like I'm going to need to put a wider brim on my tinfoil hat.

    --

    ---
    Those who can, do
    Those who can't, teach
    Those who don't know how, supervise
  19. Outsourcing is a way around civil liberties by paronomasia5 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I saw a talk by Steve Rambam at Hope 05. Besides a live demo of a database that freakin blew my mind (in a live demo in than 30 seconds, steve pulled up everything about a guy in the audience, including past roommates, active phone lines, and his mom's credit report using *ONLY HIS SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER*).

    his assertion is that privacy is dead, not because Big Brother in D.C. is watching, but because Big Defense Contrator is watching. The government, sick of trying to ram through legislation on what it can and can't do with data it collects on its citizens, is now sub-contracting all kinds of tasks. For example, perhaps the Feds can't do a nation-wide driver's license photo scan without inciting privacy concerns; however, if most of the states sub-contract out their photo processing to a contractor on advice from big brother, then that contractor hires itself to the big brother and sells *RESULTS* from some data mining query (but never the data itself), then big brother hasn't violated any privacy rights. Similarly for phone logs, criminal databases, airline data, medicare, drivers license, health databases, traffic tickets etc.

    he told me the name of the database we should all really be afraid of, bigger than Echelon, but i forgot its name.

    His bio for those who are interested: Steven Rambam is a licensed private investigator and the owner and CEO of Pallorium, Inc., an investigative agency with offices and affiliates throughout the world. During the past 23 years, he has conducted and coordinated investigations in more than 50 countries and in nearly every U.S. state and Canadian province. For the past 13 years, he has also been the owner and director of PallTech, an online service which provides database and investigative support services to investigative agencies, special investigative units (SIUs), and law enforcement. PallTech offers interactive and non-interactive access to nearly 600 data sources, including five major proprietary databases such as Skiptrace America and BusinessFinder America. The Skiptrace America database, which currently contains more than 5.3 billion unique records, is believed to be the largest individual reference database in the United States, excluding those databases maintained by the three U.S. credit bureaus. More than a decade ago Rambam forced the tightening of airport security in Texas airports by publicly exposing those airports' security flaws. In 1997 he exposed the presence in Canada of 162 Nazi war criminals and also conducted investigations which resulted in the prosecution and conviction of war criminals on murder charges. He is also the inspiration for "Rambam the detective" in Kinky Friedman's series of murder mysteries.

  20. I'd rather that they... by MacFury · · Score: 5, Insightful
    when they could be looking for terrorists...

    I'd rather the US government stop creating terrorists. Then we wouldn't have to go looking for them.