Slashdot Mirror


The Perfect Online Music Store?

brace asks: "With the proliferation of online music sales, more and more companies are jumping onto the bandwagon and trying to sell you downloadable music. Some of them do a good job, some of them are just bad at it. The question I have for Slashdot readers is essentially 'What would the perfect online music store offer you?' Should it have OGG and FLAC tracks, as well as MP3? Would you rather pay per-song or per-month? Would you want the option to purchase hard-copy as well (like the actual album, or even band merchandise)? Should the song samples be 30 second downloads or full-song streams fed on-demand? Is a radio station important for an online music store?" "Personally, I'd like to see a store that has a 24/7 internet radio station, on-demand streaming, $0.99 downloads (and $9.99 album downloads), links to purchase actual albums or merchandise, and with MP3, OGG, and FLAC support. I'd also like to see the artists being paid more than 10%..."

26 of 532 comments (clear)

  1. This is what id like.. by PepsiProgrammer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Personally I think it would be great if a music store kept the files in wav format and encoded them on the fly so you could choose any format you like (caching the popular options). Sure they would probably have to charge more, but I think it would be worth it.

    Oh and no DRM please, I like my music without bullshit.

    --
    "The United States has no right, no desire, and no intention to impose our form of government on anyone else." - Bush 05
    1. Re:This is what id like.. by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 4, Informative

      but generally it's legal to import something if it has a legal license in the country of origin, to my knowledge.

      That's generally untrue. And it makes sense:

      Imagine if there was a country, Strongbadia, which had very liberal copyright laws, and permitted anyone to make copies of recorded music for a nominal fee. Imagine further that they tended to obtain copies of music from the US, reproduce them en masse for a miniscule sum, and then send the copies they made back to the US, flooding the US market.

      The US copyright holder would be totally undercut, since he gets no meaningful profits from the Strongbadian copies, which are made against his will by third parties, and are cheaper than US-made and authorized copies.

      So imports are generally prohibited so as to make a US copyright worth something. The pertinent statute is 17 USC 602. It has two independent subsections, (a), and (b). There are some exceptions to the ban in (a) that do NOT apply to the ban in (b). This is important.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    2. Re:This is what id like.. by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The US copyright holder would be totally undercut, since he gets no meaningful profits from the Strongbadian copies, which are made against his will by third parties, and are cheaper than US-made and authorized copies.

      So let me get this straight: it's wrong for me to buy music from Russia where I can get it more cheaply, because I'd be undercutting the honest American business man?

      But it's right for American businesses to outsourced my job to India where they can get labor more cheaply, because that's streamlining business and creating efficiency?

      Man!

      One day I want to live somewhere where real, living, breathing -- and maybe starving -- people have as many rights as faceless, soulless, corporations.

      But I guess it's fair, those corporations paid good money -- money they made by charging customers like me more -- to buy the politicians who wrote them the favorable laws.

    3. Re:This is what id like.. by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 4, Informative

      So let me get this straight: it's wrong for me to buy music from Russia where I can get it more cheaply, because I'd be undercutting the honest American business man?

      Yeah.

      I mean, what would the point of having a US copyright be, what value would it have, what incentive would it bear, if we let copies into the country that couldn't have been made here legally to begin with?

      It does make sense if you want US copyrights to be meaningful. Otherwise it only takes one country to abolish copyright law and be a pirate, or to have super-weak copyright law (e.g. 1 day terms or something), and the actual authors and US publishers get screwed.

      This is actually why the US has been very aggressive in trade discussions with countries that do this: Taiwan, China, Ukraine, etc. In fact, we are insanely pissed off at Ukraine for allowing piracy of American-authored works, since those copies get into markets around the world. We're cutting them off from other US trade, and imposing high tariffs so that they're uncomfortable enough to stop. This often works: Imagine how fucked Taiwan would be if we didn't let their goods into the US. Of course they caved in. The US is kind of a trade bully. Because that's where the money is.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  2. allofmp3.com by n0iz77 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    allofmp3.com is already amazing. super low prices and i can get most of the music in ogg q5. :)

    1. Re:allofmp3.com by bullitB · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unless you're a Russian citizen, living in Russia, listening to the music in Russia, allofmp3.com is also not legal. If you're going to violate local copyright laws, at least use a P2P service where they don't take down your name and credit card number.

    2. Re:allofmp3.com by blackmonday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Those of us in the USA who buy music from allofmp3 need to remind ourselves thats it's not legal here. But dammit its the closest thing to perfect. There media app downloads the songs for you in the background, the tunes are dirt cheap and they have a good (but not excellent, at least in punk) selection. Their search engine sucks though. Search for "corazon oro" without the quotes, then search for "corazon de oro". that song should be there in the first search! I would also like it if it embedded the album cover into the tune, so iTunes could display it.

    3. Re:allofmp3.com by jonathan_95060 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unless you're a Russian citizen, living in Russia, listening to the music in Russia, allofmp3.com is also not legal. If you're going to violate local copyright laws, at least use a P2P service where they don't take down your name and credit card number.


      And what do you base this statement on? Forget proof, has RIAA even ever commented on allofMP3? Last time I searched RIAA was mute on the subject of AllofMP3.com which is strange when you consider how much music US customers download from there. It is inconceivable that RIAA is unaware that US citizens are using AllofMP3 in droves.

      Granted, ripping CDs in the US and uploading them to allofMP3 is likely to be illegal but I have seen nothing to suggest that downloading music from allofMP3.com is illegal.

      Presumably if it was illegal to download from allofMP3 then RIAA would get an injunction (or some such legal device) against the credit card companies so that VISA and Mastercard would not let US customers do business with AllofMP3.

      I've used AllofMP3.com for nearly a year and I'm thrilled with them. They give me MP3s in the format I want (192kbps VBR MP3s) and they have old hard to find music (e.g. King Crimson - Discipline) that I can't get from other online services.

      SIDEBAR: it was actually the fact that I couldn't fine old AC/DC and King Crimson albums that I wanted on iTunes that drove me to AllofMP3, not the fact that AllofMP3 is cheaper!
    4. Re:allofmp3.com by NSash · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's actually not true. I am not a lawyer, but until I hear from one, I think I'll go by this.

      602 - Infringing importation of copies or phonorecords

      (a) Importation into the United States, without the authority of the owner of copyright under this title, of copies or phonorecords of a work that have been acquired outside the United States is an infringement of the exclusive right to distribute copies or phonorecords under section 106, actionable under section 501. This subsection does not apply to--

      (1) importation of copies or phonorecords under the authority or for the use of the Government of the United States or of any State or political subdivision of a State, but not including copies or phonorecords for use in schools, or copies of any audiovisual work imported for purposes other than archival use;

      (2) importation, for the private use of the importer and not for distribution, by any person with respect to no more than one copy or phonorecord of any one work at any one time, or by any person arriving from outside the United States with respect to copies or phonorecords forming part of such person's personal baggage
      [...]

      (b) In a case where the making of the copies or phonorecords would have constituted an infringement of copyright if this title had been applicable, their importation is prohibited. In a case where the copies or phonorecords were lawfully made, the United States Customs Service has no authority to prevent their importation unless the provisions of section 601 are applicable.

    5. Re:allofmp3.com by kayen_telva · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I fail to see how that case you cite relates.
      so I guess I guess I can post links to bugs bunny to support mine.
      is buying russian liquor illegal ? is buying a russian fur hat illegal ? no.

      http://www.museekster.com/allofmp3faq.htm#Is%20All ofmp3%20legal?
      http://www.technewsworld.com/story /34512.html
      http://news.com.com/5208-1027-0.html?forumID=1&thr eadID=1110&messageID=4945&start=-181

      2 friggin seconds on google and your little soapbox is destroyed

    6. Re:allofmp3.com by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 4, Informative

      What, can't you read?

      (b) In a case where the making of the copies or phonorecords would have constituted an infringement of copyright if this title had been applicable, their importation is prohibited.

      That means that unless the copies made would have been legal had US law applied at the place where they were made -- and therefore, since only the US copyright holder has power under US law, he would have had to consent; Russian organizations have no blanket power under US law -- they are NOT importable.

      And since the exception in (a)(2) only applies to (a), and not (b), you're fucked.

      Also 602 doesn't apply. Downloading is reproduction, not importation. Check it out: Intellectual Reserve v. Utah Lighthouse Ministry, 75 F. Supp 2d 1290, 1294 (D. Utah 1999).

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    7. Re:allofmp3.com by clifyt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "There media app downloads the songs for you in the background, the tunes are dirt cheap and they have a good (but not excellent, at least in punk) selection."

      Its easy to be dirt cheap when the price of adding a new song to the server is around $16.95 + worldwide shipping from Amazon.

      Its dirt cheap because they don't pay the artists. More than that, folks like me that get paid on points (regardless of the fact its a quarter of someone elses half or a percentage of a point) don't get paid -- especially when some of us take chances on more unknown artists knowing that if we do great work, we might get paid later -- while if we do shitty work, we probably won't get anything.

      The fact is, folks like Downfuckinghill Battle scream about artists get only $0.10 a song (which is actually a higher percentage than most get from anything sold at BestBuy or WalMart), while the same folks bragging about this are willing to fuck over everyone in the music industry because they are trying to fucking save us from ourselves.

      Personally, I have a job doing research that keeps me afloat. Music buys me gear, gets me into parties that geeks like me should never be allowed close to, and puts some pocket change in my wallet. And yet, I've worked on shit that was high profile enough that I know friends of mine have ripped the shit off a P2P site -- and honestly, thats what I consider allofmp3 -- just an illegal operation running under laws that are not quite clear in Russia and not up to the technical reality of today nor intended to be used in the way they are, and actually even illegal for them to sell outside of their borders -- let alone illegal for you to download outside of their borders as well.

      I've taken a look at the site and it pisses me off. Music as a commodity and not an art. Buy it in bulk. You aren't paying per song, you are paying per the bandwidth. Want higher quality -- its more money to download. The artist gets exactly the same percentage of the sale -- NOTHING.

      Honestly, as a musician and technician , I can hear the difference between MP3s, AAC or WAV but I don't care. I buy the music not for the quality, but for the content. Audiophiles have always gotten on my fucking nerves. If you weren't around when it was originally recorded, you are getting no where near the original quality, so it doesn't matter. This is why we go to see concerts and why I don't get tired of seeing the same band a few dozen times a year (well the fact that they pay me to be there is beside the point -- I'd have been there with simply the invite and the travel reimbursement).

      What would be more important that quality to me would be all the lyrics and artist notes to the song. Cover art? its nice, but not integral to the music. Lyrics, notes -- definitely important and can make the difference between a good song and a great one because it sets the mood and context.

      Past that, iTMS is perfect for me. And I just checked -- it looks like its got my friends band's bio pages up -- maybe one of these days they will have their own customized mini portals as well one of these days.

  3. iTunes rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After 3 years of boycotting music and not buying any, I finally started using iTunes 4 months back. Since then I've purchased 10 albums. I tried MusicMatch and looked at Real, but honestly iTunes is the most user friendly.

    1. Re:iTunes rock by dbn3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      [Listening to the new U2 single just bought on iTunes :) ]

      Now that I am more than 10 years out of college, it is definately worth $0.99 to just get the song I want without trolling the p2p networks looking for music.

      Besides, in recent years, if it ain't hip with the teen/college crowd, it ain't on the p2p networks. Those tracks that are there are of very variable quality -- you have to get several copies because some moron can't rip or encode correctly. It's just not worth the hassle.

      Things I really like about iTunes:
      - cost;
      - quality;
      - ease of purchase;
      - the "others also bought" links let me explore things I haven't heard before; and, of course
      - buying the single for a buck instead of a 10 track crappy cd for $14 for that one single.

      Things I still am waiting for:
      - broader catalogue (Madonna and The Beatles for two are still not available)

      --
      open mind: teaching computers the stuff
  4. So, the obvious comments: by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Look at it this way, there are two groups of replies to this:

    The Slashdot Crowd...

    They're going to demand support for all of the Ogg contained codecs.
    They're going to demand no drm, even optionally, so while you'll probably see AAC as a general format, you wont see fair-play.
    You'll see the classic mp3, of course.
    The price is going to have to be far less than 99c, since so many people here resent all things associated with the Apple store. I'm thinking what, 30 pence will please you guys?

    The Normal Crowd...
    For everyone else, you know what the perfect music store would be? The iTunes music store with basically a few additions:
    There should be some ability to purchase at least some songs (i.e. certain classical pieces) at a higher bitrate.
    There should be the ability to purchase files for more than one player, so that may mean something like WMA.

    There's probably more, but I think these are the key points...

    --
    "Stumble before you crawl"
  5. already exists... by MrBlic · · Score: 4, Informative
    Magnatune fits your description and it already exists. All we need is to have Magnatune license it's storefront for many other publishers to open and make some money in a similar grass-roots way.

    http://www.magnatune.com

    I'm not affiliated in any way other than to love what they do. I've listened to lots of stuff, including their streaming mp3s of entire genres. I have bought a couple of albums from magnatune, and still listen to it today. It's been a long time since I've been into music this much.

    -Jim

    --
    Celebrate Excellence!
  6. Easy... by kelnos · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Give me a choice of Ogg Vorbis or FLAC, give me the choice to pay an "all you can eat"-type periodic subscription, or a per-song price (with a discount for an "album's" worth of songs). I'd like to see this store backed by artists who actually get a large chunk of my change, not by huge music conglomerates. The obvious one: I don't want any DRM on the files themselves. A supported Linux client is a must, of course (or a web interface). 30 second preview clips are good enough for me to decide if I like a song enough to buy it.

    So, as you might guess, I'm not buying any online music anytime soon...

    --
    Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
  7. sound quality by evil+crash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Guaranteed sound quality, and the ability to re-download any track I've ever purchased. (Ya just never know when ya might lose it.)

    --
    "Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job."-THG
  8. What I would like to see... by mcwop · · Score: 4, Interesting
    To be up front I like Apple's music store, but it needs vast improvement:

    • Create magazines by genre. Example, a punk page with weekly news album reviews highlights etc. Tour dates. Could have one for Classical etc...
    • More indy music, most stores do not have the more esoteric independant stuff that I want.
    • Allow bands to set up their own bootleg store page, where they can upload and sell live albums or singles - all to be billed thorugh the main store
    • Set up store preferences, like the landing page by music genre etc...

    That is it off the top of my head.

    --

    "I don't think it's selfish, to eat defenseless shellfish." -NOFX

  9. Don't buy music online. by EvilCabbage · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I find music worth buying, I seek it out in my local, privately owned music store. These little stores are often owned by people that love music and they really need help to keep the money in the local economy.

    After I purchase my real, shiny CD I rip it to MP3 and stick the CD on my shelf. If my hard drive crashes and burns, I've got my hard copy right there, waiting to be re-ripped.

    I just don't see the appeal in buying music online in the way proposed. My idea of buying something involves actually having a physical end product, otherwise it's just called 'renting'.

  10. you just described allofmp3 by poptones · · Score: 4, Insightful
    and the prices are good, too. Problem is those "wav" files seem to be ripped in analog format or something, cuz their quality is very erratic.

    No fucking way am I gonna pay a buck a song and ten bucks an album for downloads unless I really like the work and can get pristine quality. Thus far I would say Magnatune does it best: you can listen to anything they have (and you can actually hear it because the quality doesn't suck) and, if you want to buy it, you can set the price and download it in high quality formats. I've bought a few albums there and have actually found myself going back to buy a work again because I decided I liked the work more than I thought and I felt bad about being such a cheap bastard.

    if the record companies would trust people to do the right thing and stop calling us all thieves they could make a LOT more money. If I can buy a used CD for five bucks, rip it and get the quality I want, why the fuck would I pay twice that for the download? Magnatune gets it... the others don't.

  11. I'll agree to that! by ValourX · · Score: 4, Informative

    Magnatune is incredible -- if only they also had Opera, I'd never have cause to listen to anything else.

    I listen to the New Age and Electronica shoutcast stations from Magnatune on Rhythmbox petty much all day and night.

    For people who like new music -- and it's *good* music, too -- Magnatune is probably the best Internet resource.

    You choose what you want to pay for an album ($4 minimum, $8 suggested, the sky is the limit) and 50% goes to the artist. You can download full-quality WAVs, MP3, OGG, FLAC, AAC, and I think there's one more. You can also download all of the album art in PDF format, so you can write your own CDs as they would be from the store, minus the DRM.

    I usually get the WAV zip file, then compress it to OGG/Vorbis for my computer and write the WAVs to CD for my car.

    -Jem

  12. Magnatune. Next question? by Hortensia+Patel · · Score: 4, Informative

    Magnatune.

    MP3, Ogg, FLAC, you name it. Listen to entire albums before buying, if you like. Most artists allow some discretion in how much you pay, depending on how much you like it and/or how much you can afford. Artist gets 50% and, IIRC, they retain full copyright.

    I'm not affiliated with them in any way, but these guys really do Get It. Give 'em a whirl, they deserve it.

  13. The mind reels by dynayellow · · Score: 4, Funny

    Asking Slashdot what the perfect store to buy music should be like. It's like asking the American Cancer Institute which cigarette has the best flavor.

  14. 10 years out by simpl3x · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since some of my CDs are nearing twenty years, and I am encoding all of them into Apple lossless, I'd like to think a decade out. Much of my music has never been really used until I have been burning them into iTunes, and while lossless is great, the availability is probably more important. Digging through a couple of thousand CDs prevents one from using the music. I will likely re-encode all of the CDs (3 of 12 boxes to go) into 256 AAC when the variable bitrate version is out with quicktime 7.0. This will give me about 120 gigs of compressed music, which will be usable on whatever Pod is around in 3 or 4 years. 128 AAC or 128 LAME is just not good enough.

    So, before I begin purchasing music online, it has to be at least 256 AAC quality, reasonable (meaning easy to disable) licensing or non-restrictive DRM, and a better selection of music. Until then, I'll buy CDs, burn them and give away or sell the worthless shell to somebody else.

    I do have to say that most people do not purchase as much music as I do, and that a certain amount of it needs to be freely available at lower bitrates. Streams are great, but smart playlists loaded on demand (RSS-ish) would be great. They could simply be automatically disposed of afterwards.

  15. Liner Notes by corian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I purchase an album digitally, I'd still like to download a PDF/Flash/something of the album art and liner notes. It's important content that the artist (or perhaps the label) feels complements the music, and that's why they are sold together. Although I'm puchasing music in a different format than a jewel case, I still want the same experience.