Football Fans For Truth
Football Fans For Truth, a real 527 organization, has updated their site with more evidence showing that John Kerry is not a true sports fan or athlete. Among the charges: he doesn't know the name of the venerable home of the Green Bay Packers, he "throws a football like a girl," and he "can't catch a football at all." Not limiting themselves to football, they also provide plenty of evidence he doesn't know much about baseball.
Ok, so John Kerry claims to like football, but he isn't a hardcore football fan. Who cares.
;). I can tell you that I don't have much respect for Dale Junior, that I think Tony Stewart has a serious attitude problem, and that I'd love to see Mark Martin's Viagra-endorsing self win the cup again. I watch the race almost every week. But beyond that, I can't tell you much.
I consider myself to be a NASCAR fan. I can tell you that I root for Mayfield and Kahne (despite driving a Chevy myself
There are people out there who could tell you, from memory, Junior's last five wins, which tracks they were at, which months they took place. There are people who could tell you how many yards Brett Favre has passed for in his last 10 games, what team he was up against in each of those games, and who the opposing QB was.
There are people who could recite all kinds of NASCAR stats, or football stats, or baseball stats, or QuakeCon winners, because they're obsessed.
John Kerry "throws like a girl?" GWB was a freakin' cheerleader. Let's see the "Football Fans for Truth" post that on their front page...
You missed the fact that it's a parody of the Swift Boat Veterans For Truth campaign.
First Mention is in this 7/15/04 Peter Gammons piece. Most of it is about Baseball, but here's the relevant paragraph:
This remarkable paragraph contains three assertions about Kerry: "middle initial", "medals", and "Yost." The first two are erroneous, and the third is not testable. "Middle initial" is false -- Kerry's middle name is his mother's maiden name, Forbes, a famous old Boston name. Gammons has an error in his "medals" story, Kerry threw ribbons over a fence; not medals in the water. You can read Thomas Oliphant's eyewitness account here or here. To summarize, Gammons makes three assertions about Kerry, and the first to are erroneous. What about the third? I don't know any way to prove a negative, but the very first mention of the "Yost" story that I can find, in Boston or anywhere else, is that 7/15 Gammons column. It's all over the blogsphere now, but Gammons has first mention. Given Gammons' other errors, I don't find it very credible.
Now just to complicate matters, Gammons brings up the "Yost" story again five days later in another column. Again, it's mostly about baseball, but here's the relevant paragraph:
This time, the "Yost" story is folded in with less controversial claims. If you're an anti-Kerry blogger, this version looks less foolish, but given the first mention amongst two canards, I don't find it credible on Gammons' say-so alone. I say bring me independent confirmation or dump it.
And now a bit on the meta-story. Let me shamelessy copy the Daily Howler and quote David Broder:
Almost. Ladies and gentleman, we're watching a brilliant campaign at
--- Often in error; never in doubt!
He still has no respect for the Constitution and will deprive you of each and every right he deems necessary in the name of security.
Swift Boat Veterans for Truth are far from baseless. They've already gotten Kerry to concede on a few points, and haven't had any of their accusations disproven. I mean, there's:
Now, what does this say about John Kerry as a candidate in 2004? I can already hear the cries of "that was 35 years ago", but his lies and exaggerations of his deeds are very recent. I can hear the cries of "at least he went", but Bush volunteered to go to Vietnam.
But hey, at least when he was called up, Kerry didn't run off to Canada or something. Instead he took a crack at emulating his personal hero, John F. Kennedy.
[PowerPoint] is a tool for capitalist presentation
---
Everyone is interested in restricting 527s.... as long as the 527 in question represents someone of the oposite political background.
---
Actually, this is incorrect. Outside of Bush (and who is very wrong in doing so), calling for the elimination of all 527s, no one even mentioned them at all until the Swift Boat Vets came out. Then all of a sudden, all the Democrats wanted conservative 527s shut down.
I don't seem to recall the massive outcries from Republicans about shutting down moveon.org and all the other 527s Soros and the DNC have been bankrolling for the past year.
I understand that stereotypes are hard to shed, but a little research will show you that it is not the Republican party or conservatives in general who have a demonstrated pattern of trying to stifle dissenting political opinion.
The RNC wasn't the group who put protesters in a cage.
You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.