Slashdot Mirror


Global Warming Expected to Intensify Hurricanes

DoraLives writes "Think this hurricane season was bad? Well according to the New York Times, a study was published online on Tuesday by The Journal of Climate indicating that warming ocean temperatures are going to make for stronger, wetter hurricanes in the coming years and decades. An abstract of the article concludes cheerfully enough that 'greenhouse gas-induced warming may lead to a gradually increasing risk in the occurrence of highly destructive category-5 storms.' Oh joy."

13 of 589 comments (clear)

  1. Nature's way... by chrispyman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps this is nature's way of saying "I hate you."

    1. Re:Nature's way... by Zarks · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Prehaps this is nature's way of telling America, the worlds biggest polluter by far to take global warming seriously.

      If this doesn't do it nothing will. It is the equivilant of being hit on the back of the head and not bothering to turn round to stop whatever hit you from hitting you again.

    2. Re:Nature's way... by Thagg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      CO2 emissions will likely increase over the next few decades, unless the countries that produce the most CO2 will start taking drastic action. That means the US, and to some extent, Europe and China. The 1% figure is about right.

      The ULEV vehicles you trash actually eliminate far worse greenhouse gases. Methane, for example, is 100x as potent a greenhouse gas as CO2, and the advanced catalysts do eliminate almost all the hydrocarbons (like methane) from the exhaust.

      These hurricanes are really Nature's way of suggesting to Floridians that their vote really matters.

      Thad

      --
      I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
  2. Weather is complicated by erick99 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even the most complicated computer models for weather systems can only approach less than 5% of the actual variability and density of the atmosphere. Consider that most forecasts are less than 50% accurate at 48hrs+. I am not dismissing the research, far from it, I just don't think the models are there yet.

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
  3. Re:one problem ... by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 4, Insightful

    you mean, there is no evidence that Dubya will admit to.

    In fact there is much much evidence, that perhaps you have chosen not to see.

    Funny how Dubya can invade Iraq, killing 10's of thousands of innocent civilians, and over a 1000 americans on NO ACCURATE EVIDENCE of there ever being ANY WMD's in Iraq ... which has since been clearly proven.

    yet at the same time, he can totally ignore the decades of research that show the world is getting warmer (whether or not its by our own hand).

    hmmm coincedentally, Dubya is an Oil man .. someone who gets great benefit through the selling of greenhouse gas producing Oil, hmmm and Dubya is someone who would benefit greatly from high oil prices produced by pinching world oil reserves through destabilizing oil markets with the false fear of terrorism, and by taking the Iraq supply off the market.

    damn I dont know why you Bushies can't see the damage Bush has done for his own personal greed. Instead you blindly follow him, ignorantly thinking he's saving you.

    --
    George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
  4. Re:The Cause of Global Warming by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ignorance is bliss isnt it?

    Actually thousands of scientists have come out and stated our CO2 emissions ARE a significant factor. You've chosen to ignore them.

    I guess you are ignoring that we've nearly doubled atmostpheric CO2 since our industrial revolution. (I bet you didnt even know that)

    I guess you are ignoring the huge greenhouse effect of methane, which we spew into the air in tremendous amounts through Oil/gas production and through the raising of Billions of cattle each year. (I bet you thought that burnt oil just disappeared, that it didn't make CO2)

    I guess you have chosen to ignore the large percentage of the planet where we have eliminated trees and other plants, removing a huge carbon sink. (did you even know that plants absorb CO2 as part of their metabolism?)

    dumbass.

    --
    George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
  5. Re:The only way to motivate by deragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If we stop pushing out green house gases nothing will change, environmently speaking. The % of CO2 in the atmosphere will still remain at the current level and will take decades to come down.

    If we stop pushing out green house gases, we stop agravating the situation. We do not improve the current situation. The pollution already released will remain. The issue is not about improving the situation, but stoping its deterioration.

    --
    Remember the year 2000? They promised us flying cars. They delivered the PT Cruiser...
  6. History by Tiggan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Or, we could quit trying to blame everything on "global warming" and realize that hurricane severity is cyclical. Florida's been due for a couple of years now.

  7. Re:Global Warming by nomadic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not especially relevant. Human beings weren't around 200 million years ago.

    The question isn't what the planet can handle but what WE can handle.

  8. Re:Whoa : Florida has very little to worry about. by Forge · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Florida has very little to worry about.
    Hurricanes do NOT kill people. The supply strong winds and lots of rain but people actually die from pore planning, stupid choices, ineffective government and most importantly large scale poverty.

    I.e. Florida lost less than 40 people in Hurricanes this year. They were directly hammered by 3 big ones (Category 3 to 5). A single category 4 passed 30 miles south of Jamaica and killed 16 people (.jm is small, 2.7 million). Meanwhile, Haiti was grazed by a tropical storm (not strong enough to be called a hurricane) and around 2000 people have died with another 100000 or so left homeless and starving (I.e. Likely to die if massive amounts of help isn't forthcoming).

    PS: I am writing from Jamaica. In case that matters.

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  9. Re:Forseen 18 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Earth's climate has been going through changes for millions of years. Why are we so vain to think that it will stop changing just because we like it the way it was?

    Probably because the evidence clearly shows that the rate of change has been accelerating since the industrial revolution. But don't let the facts get in the way of your nice comfortable lifestyle.

  10. Scientists don't know EVERYTHING=lets do NOTHING? by IvyMike · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are many models for the effects of carbon dioxide in the atmostphere being proposed by scientists. Our best, most extensive computer models show that increased C02 will lead to climate change, and our best records show that humans activity has increased atmospheric C02 by about a third.

    But the models all disagree exactly how much. And there are other sources of C02 (although there is no evidence any of them are responsible for the increases since the industial age). And since models always have to take a few shortcuts (instead of modelling every atom) they may have ignored something that could affect climate. Unfortunately, there are things we don't understand; our computer models don't explain all historical climate changes (even though every model has more C02 = climate change). And who knows, maybe the sun is hotter (even though the evidence for this is sketchier than any of the other data).

    Some people turn these little bits of uncertainty into a complete lack of action. They argue that climate change is
    natural", ignoring the fact that it's catastrophic and we might be able to do something about it. They choose to do nothing, and rush us ever faster into the abyss in our giant, wasteful SUVS.

    A large climate change is bad news for humans, and we have some evidence that we are responsible for some of it, and we have some evidence that we might be able to slow or reverse it. Do we need more evidence? Hell yes. But if we wait for the climate experiment known as "the earth's atmosphere" to finish, we'll be doomed. I believe that human ingenuity will be able make the world a place where humans can continue to thrive.

    P.S. I don't understand why "less pollution, less waste" is seen as more as a burden and not an opportunity for business.

  11. Re:Forseen 18 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Did your dad ever mention what caused enough global warming 11,000 years ago to cause the glaciers to receed? I know it wasn't my SUV. Maybe it had something to do with proto-republicans?

    Hey num-nuts. There is a difference between 5 degree change over 100,000 years and 5 degree change of 10 years.