Slashdot Mirror


William Shatner to Star in New Reality TV Series

Gildor writes "The small town of Riverside, Iowa has long billed itself as the birthplace of James T. Kirk. So they were thrilled when William Shatner came there to film a Star Trek prequel about the early life of Kirk. Except there was no movie. After about 9 days, Shatner announced they were actually filming a reality TV mini-series."

24 of 271 comments (clear)

  1. Too much reality tv by benna · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When are people going to stop allowing the networks to shove this filth down their throats?

    --
    "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
    1. Re:Too much reality tv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      benna, You're Fired!(tm)

    2. Re:Too much reality tv by sgant · · Score: 4, Funny

      But Shatner is already in a series...Boston Law or whatever it's called now. Comes on tonight on ABC, check local listings.

      No, it's not that TJ Hooker hung up his gun and became a lawyer either...though that might be interesting.

      Shatner won an Emmy last year...yeah, hard to belive. The Emmy's are still kind of sort of legit (please insert indignation about what show you loved that didn't get nominated) but at least they're not like the "Throw-in-every-catagory
      there-is-so-everyone-get s-an-award-no-matter-what" that is the Grammys. If you put out a record, you get a Grammy.

      Ok, I have NO idea how I drove the topic right into a ditch...what were we talking about again?

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
  2. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Kahhhhhhhhnnnnnnn

    1. Re:Obligatory by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's Khan. As in "KHAAAN!"

  3. Born in Iowa? by Narmi · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought he was Canadian.

    1. Re:Born in Iowa? by Evangelion · · Score: 5, Informative

      Kirk was born in Iowa, not Shatner.

      Jeez, geeks these days just aren't what they used to be...

  4. shitener by s4m7 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I've never seen any celebrity with so much contempt for the fanbase that made him famous as Shatner. It's pretty friggin funny though.

    I wonder where the guy is who's sitting around thinking "you know what our fall lineup needs? another reality show!"

    --
    This comment is fully compliant with RFC 527.
    1. Re:shitener by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oh, that's not really fair. Have you read his "Get a Life"? Contempt is the last word I would use to describe his feelings towards his fans. (The book title is mocking his (in)famous joke on SNL, btw.)

  5. predicting the future by ilikeitraw · · Score: 5, Funny

    They should team Shatner up with Hasslehoff.
    A Space / Beach setting with the Olsen twins thrown in as well... with a reality twist maybe ?
    Money baby... money.

  6. When people stop watching them? by brunes69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The networks are out to make money, not be your friend. They wouldn't be airing reality TV if they didnt make money at it.

    However, the profit margins on a reality TV show are MUCH higher. They don't have to pay expensive actors, they don't have to build or maintain sets, they don't need to hire extras from the screen actors guild, etc. They can even usually do product placements *on* the shows to make more money.

    Then you have shows like American Idol - not only is the show cheap, but afterwards, they have an artist that is guaranteed to sell at least a few records - and they don't have to spend any money promoting them!

    The marketers that convinced the masses to watch these shows are pure genius. And the networks are laughing all the way to the bank.

    1. Re:When people stop watching them? by Nehi+the+Ganchark · · Score: 5, Funny

      "They don't have to pay expensive actors..." Can I assume that is why they called Shatner?

    2. Re:When people stop watching them? by LemonFire · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thats why I want people to stop allowing this shit to be shoved down their throats...I know its the people that watch who are at fault.

      I agree totally with this statement.
      I really miss the quality TV programming we had about five years ago, it was so much more enriching and educational.

    3. Re:When people stop watching them? by Nyder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      you are the one missing the point, benna. People watch it because they enjoy it. You do NOT obviously enjoy it, so I assume you do not watch it. If people didn't watch the show, they wouldn't make it, or if they did make it, wouldn't make money off of it (because networks wouldn't show it if they get too many complaints). That how tv works.

      But crying about peoples bad taste, and trying to tell others not to watch it because YOU don't watch it is lame and selfish.

      I personally don't watch much reality shows because I think they are stupid. So I watch other things on TV. Very simple, I just change the channel.

      Everyone has different taste, the networks try to make money by showing stuff the appeals to some majority of people ('cept niche channels, like food, so on). They cannot please everyone all the time. hell, they can't please most people most the time. That's why there is feedback and Nelson ratings and so on.

      So it's very simple, you don't like a show, don't watch it, complain to the network hosting the show, complain to the company producing the show.

      But DO NOT try to blame people for watching the show. People are allowed to watch what they want, even if you do NOT like it. I know it hurts to hear that the world does no evolve around you, but it's true. I'm sorry.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    4. Re:When people stop watching them? by Thing+1 · · Score: 4, Funny
      That's why there is feedback and Nelson ratings and so on.

      For your typo: " Ha -ha!"

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  7. Sounds like a good thing all around. by lonesome+phreak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    According to the article, Shatner, when he announced it was a hoax, gave the town $100,000 as a gift. The crew of the "film" donated $12,000 to the library. Most people where just happy to have him in town...and Shatner said it wasn't going to make fun of anyone - the reality TV show was when a big Hollywood production company comes in to a small town.

    They also spent $1,000,000 to make the show, much of that going into the towns economy. What would be REALLY cool was if the reality show went over well and Shatner decided to actually make the movie into a real movie. That could be pretty cool, and it would already have tons of publicity and marketing started for it.

    --
    Maybe we DID take the blue pill. You wouldn't remember anyway.
  8. Early life of Kirk? by dougmc · · Score: 4, Insightful
    So they were thrilled when William Shatner came there to film a Star Trek prequel about the early life of Kirk. Except there was no movie.
    So, what role would Shatner play here? Kirk's dad? Shatner is almost 40 years older than he was when he first played Kirk. I hope you weren't thinking that they could pull off 40+ years off of Shatner to make him seem even younger than he was when Star Trek started (he's 73 now. He was around 35 when Star Trek started.)

    I guess it would make sense for Shatner to have a cameo in whatever Trek show they might make about Kirk, but he won't be playing Kirk in any prequels :)

    But reality TV? Blech. I'd rather have a 73 old old Shatner trying to play a 30 year old Kirk :)

  9. Fraud in the name of Television by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This seems to be a going trend for TV producers to claim they are working on project A in order to get people to unwittingly participate in project B... here on Slashdot not to look ago there was a warning story about MTV Networks fooling experts into appearing on a Comedy Central project called "Crossballs"

    MTV Networks seems to be making a habit of this. MTV itself fooled a half dozen college students who thought they were interning on a music video project into being the stars of Faking the Video. And let's not forget TNN/SpikeTV's project called The Joe Schmo Show.

    There oughta be a law against these things... because apparently basic fraud hasn't caught up to when fraud is being done in the name of TV.

    1. Re:Fraud in the name of Television by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Yeah. I'd get a good lawyer, not take the money.

      Many years ago, the first "reality TV show", "Candid Camera", actually did get busted. They were operating in a store, and when a customer put his hat on the counter (this was a long time ago), they tried to sell the hat back to him. During the dispute with the customer, a cop walked in. Listened to the participants. Said, to the Candid Camera guy, "That's not a new hat. You're under arrest". The Candid Camera people came out from hiding, showed the camera, and said they were filming a TV show. The cop told them "It doesn't matter. You tried to steal the guy's hat. You're still under arrest", called for backup, and sent the whole crew to the lockup.

      This was back when New York City's official policy on filming was "This city is too busy to make way for film crews". Now it's "Free permits, free locations, free police assistance". And tax credits.

  10. No, THIS is William Shatner's Low-Point by Nova+Express · · Score: 4, Informative
    Reality TV? (scoff)

    No, THIS is his low-point, William Shatner's Spplat Attack, a DVD of a Star Trek-themed day of paintball. A friend bought this and brought it over one night.

    It was painful.

    Very painful.

    How painful was it? There was actually a moment when I wished I was watching Star Trek V instead.

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  11. Yeah, and merge it with Knight Rider too by cliveholloway · · Score: 4, Funny

    It would be very appropriate for them to drive the "Shatner / Hasslehoff Industries Two Thousand".

    cLive ;-)

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  12. People are not merely means by gilroy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This isn't a "good thing all around". It's a terrible thing. Basically, a bunch of people in "the biz" decided it would be funny to fool a small town community. They came in, lied, manipulated, and essentially disrespected these people, then decided that their trust was worth about $100,000. The donated money is a bribe, plain and simple, to buy off the feeble stirrings of conscience in Shatner, et al.

    I see this happening more and more, and it's starting to get to me. People aren't here for your entertainment. Real people aren't the Sims, for Pete's sake. They don't go about their lives just to relieve the tedium of yours. It's a bad thing to treat people as if they were just means to be used in achieving your ends, whether that's something cartoony grand or as mundane as filling half an hour of that gaping void that is your life.

    People are not means only.

    I don't care that they got "genuine reactions" and "true feeling" and all that other crap that producers of shows like this believe justify their deceptions. In the end, a bunch of Hollywood types decided that small town people can be easily duped for the entertainment of a jaded national audience.

    And for all those who asked, back when the reality craze fist hit, what harm Survivor etc. could do... well, here we are. These people didn't volunteer for the reality show; they were impressed into service, kidnapped.

    1. Re:People are not merely means by gilroy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Blockquoth the poster:

      One person got paid $5,000 for nine days. The town made $100,000. In two weeks. Not bad. Let's just ssee how it plays out.

      It's not about the money. It's about the license taken by the producers. Those people weren't paid for their reactions on a reality show. They were paid for help in producing a movie. If they had known the ultimate destination of the footage, they might have been OK with it. Or they might have demanded more money. Or they might have chosen not to participate. The point is, they were denied that choice. In essence a fraud was perpetrated on them.

      (And don't give me any of those "people play pranks on their friends all the time" lines. These people weren't friends; they were business associates. It matters.)
  13. Re:When it stops being cheap. by UnrepentantHarlequin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    people WANT to watch realityshit.. sad truth.

    Actually, I think more people than not want to watch something, they don't really care what it is. I know people who just flip through the channels trying to find something worth watching. They're not in front of the TV because there's a show they want to watch -- they're there because it's their default mode of existence, and they try to find a show they can tolerate watching. I suspect a fair percentage of the "reality" TV watchers are the same: they're watching it because it's what's on, not because it's anything they would watch if there was something better competing with it. The creators make it because it's cheap and easy, so it's what's on. The viewers are making a choice between "reality" TV and no TV, not "reality" TV and something else worth watching.