Slashdot Mirror


Medicine/Physiology Nobel Laureates Announced

Seehund writes "Today, the Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet announced the laureates of this year's Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. Richard Axel and Linda B. Buck are jointly awarded the Nobel Prize for their discoveries in the field of odorant receptors and the organization of the olfactory system."

22 of 76 comments (clear)

  1. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That really stinks.

    (It's a JOKE, not flamebait.)

  2. Obligitory... by wviperw · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, I remember reading that paper... it stunk.

    Ba Dum Cha!

    I'll be here all week folks. Try the fish!

    --
    Nothing disturbs me more than blind loyalism towards some unrealistic and over-idealistic notion of one's nationality.
    1. Re:Obligitory... by Kinkify · · Score: 2, Funny

      *Jedi hand-wave* You do not smell that fart.

  3. They get a lot of dollars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    For studying scents.

    It was close, though - they won by a nose.

  4. Nice News... by Elracim · · Score: 2, Funny

    I saw this and thought: Aren't there enough bad jokes on slashdot already? Do the editors go out of their way to put these stories up? I can't think of a single thing to say that doesn't involve some bad pun or reference to flatulence... and I'm sure I'm not alone.

    --
    All Rights Reserved. All Wrongs Avenged.
  5. follow your nose... by k4_pacific · · Score: 3, Funny

    "...awarded the Nobel Prize for their discoveries in the field of odorant receptors and the organization of the olfactory system."

    I wonder if it explains why your own farts don't smell as bad as others.

    --
    Unknown host pong.
  6. Highly spiffy by sharky611aol.com · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It's about time. Every class I took as an undergrad in physiology and neuroscience always just glossed over olfaction. It's amazing how little we know about this sense compared to the other senses. We have a fairly complete understanding of the way sight (for instance, did you know that the visual cortex can perform on the fly Fourier analysis??), sound, and sensation (with the notable exception of pain) work, yet olfaction has always baffled us - mainly because we couldn't fathom of a system that would have thousands of different receptors that could each recognize a different smell (whoops!).

    Kudos to Drs. Axel and Buck.

    1. Re:Highly spiffy by biobogonics · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's about time. Every class I took as an undergrad in physiology and neuroscience always just glossed over olfaction. It's amazing how little we know about this sense compared to the other senses.

      Among brain functions, smell is one of the most primitive, so an understanding of smell helps us understand a variety of other organisms. Mapping receptors to genes may also give us insight into how other neural sensory systems work. Finally, there are close and very primitive relationships between smell and the old emotional parts of the brain (the limbic system) so this type of study may ultimately shed some light on emotional or mental disorders as well.

    2. Re:Highly spiffy by amcox · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, while other animals have more, humans only have about 350 different receptors. The key to our ability to smell so many distinct scents is that each odorant will activate more then one kind of recpetor. Thus, olfaction is not, "oh, this receptor lit up, so it's this smell," but rather, "these receptors lit up, and combined they produce this smell."

    3. Re:Highly spiffy by mangu · · Score: 2, Informative
      the visual cortex can perform on the fly Fourier analysis


      So can the ear. And a guitar string. And a grass field in the wind. Actually, it was the other way round. Mathematicians (well, Jean Baptiste Fourier, one French mathematician) invented the Fourier analysis in order to understand how complex signals can be separated into different frequencies by simple natural systems.

  7. Re:It's all great...... by leonara · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe its just a slump year!

    With all the research on going around us, one would have expected some new breakthrough in cures for some of the diseases that plague us. However, since there is only one broad category for medicine and physiology, chances are that new techniques to identify/cure diseases would always take precedence over research of this kind - which though not earth shattering, would have taken as much decidation and perseverance.

    And in the end "The judges decision is final"!

    --
    -- Off to build a bridge between the twin peaks of Mt. Kilimanjaro.
  8. Re:It's all great...... by ktulus+cry · · Score: 5, Informative
    The original paper wasn't just a foundation for the discovery of thousands of beforehand unknown olfactory receptors, it was a founding paper in the searching of multi-gene families.

    Here comes some science: it was accepted/assumed that all these receptors were transmembrane g-protein coupled receptors. Without getting into that, they all span the cell membrane with 7 hydrophobic transmembrane domains. These are all well conserved among the receptors, and a couple of them are VERY conserved. They designed a whole bunch of PCR primers based on these regions of similarity and mixed pairs of them together to see what happened.

    One pair light up a genome PCR like mad. It was very very clear that a whole gene family existed that shared homology to the very few known odorant receptors.

    So while it is true that you might not think that smell is a huge deal (the mechanics are rather mind-boggling, and scienctists don't like not understanding things), they have paved the way for that as well as provided a hugely referenced technique for scanning genomes for multi-gene families. That in itself is worthy of at least a nomination.

  9. Stuyvesant rules! by JohnQPublic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Woo hoo! That makes 4 Nobel laureates for Stuyvesant HS! Axel is class of '63

  10. Axel and IP by theodicey · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This is the same Richard Axel who has engaged in sleazy intellectual property practice with his cotransformation patents (basically, the process of randomly inserting a gene into organisms' DNA, and finding out which insertions have been successful).

    The Public Patent Foundation (which recently got Microsoft's FAT filesystem patent rejected) has gotten the patent office to agree to re-examine the most recent, presumably illegitimate Axel patents.

    Of course this work has almost nothing to do with the work for which he was awarded the Nobel prize...

    1. Re:Axel and IP by k98sven · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes it's the same Axel.

      No, it doesn't have much to do with what he's getting the prize.

      And I'm not certain these 'sleazly practices' necessarily have anything to do with him directly either.

      He got a patent for a valid discovery. (noone is questioning the original patent)

      Columbia made a lot of money off it. So much money that they apparently tried to re-patent the same discovery.

      I'd say it's more likely a greedy Columbia board of trustees than him personally.

      But anyway, it's still not very relevant.

  11. Re:It's all great...... by reagank · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I thought that at first, too, but it turns out there are plenty of practical things here. First, it gives some pretty interesting insight in how the brain processes smell. Beyond the knowledge of brain function, which could be useful in other arenas, it's also possible to use this to create an "artifical nose", which could be used to sniff out bombs or, and I know this sounds loopy, but it's true, to detect disease. There are already mice trained to sniff out cancer in litter-mates, so if we knew HOW they did it, then we could create something to do it for humans.

  12. Olfaction is of central importance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Olfaction is of central importance for most species

    All living organisms can detect and identify chemical substances in their environment. It is obviously of great survival value to be able to identify suitable food and to avoid putrid or unfit foodstuff. Whereas fish has a relatively small number of odorant receptors, about one hundred, mice - the species Axel and Buck studied - have about one thousand. Humans have a somewhat smaller number than mice; some of the genes have been lost during evolution.

    Smell is absolutely essential for a newborn mammalian pup to find the teats of its mother and obtain milk - without olfaction the pup does not survive unaided. Olfaction is also of paramount importance for many adult animals, since they observe and interpret their environment largely by sensing smell. For example, the area of the olfactory epithelium in dogs is some forty times larger than in humans.

  13. Olfaction and memory by f00zy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Kidding aside, this is interesting and worthy of praise. Olfaction is deeply intertwined with memory and an important part of general living. They have mapped genes involved in the process and identified a seemingly tree-like messaging hierarchy where messages can meet and interact to produce unique smells/thoughts/ideas in differnt parts of the brain.

  14. Damned good work by siskbc · · Score: 4, Informative
    Thanks for saying that. I work on artifical olfaction, and our research group has collaborated with Linda Buck's group. Having done so, I can say that her work is in fact groundbreaking. Smell is the least complicated, and evolutionarily oldest of all the senses. This alone makes it worth investigating, simply because of the insights it can give us on human perception.

    Work that Linda's group, in conjunction with our group and a number of others, has brought us closer to understanding how odor works on a molecular level, to how odor is perceived, to how we can model this using artificial equipment.

    Ultimately, she is well deserving of the Prize.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  15. Obligatory Futurama Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Professor: Eat it, everyone who's never won a Nobel Prize! And that includes you, Amy!
    Amy: (sobs)

    -- A No-Account Drifter

  16. Re:It's all great...... by Cryect · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One thing to note is Nobel prizes in medicine are often awarded well after the original discovery. Second off, goto take a neurophysiology class and you will find out that since their paper, smell is one of the most completely understood systems of how it works. Its also often used as examples in showing how feedback, feedforward, and lateral inhibition work. Its really an important work in being able to understand how neurons interact and work better from the first neurons that get the signal to those that store the info in the brain.

  17. Shape vs. Vibration Theories by Sigfried · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Axel, et al are firmly in the predominant "Shape" theory camp regarding smell. There is also a small but resilient camp that wonder why certain substances (e.g hydrogen cynanide and bitter almonds) smell very similar but have no common molecular structure. There is no doubt that the huge genetic pool discovered by Axel produce a large variety of receptors that do *something*, and thanks to their work the pathways to the brain are now known, but exactly *what* is being detected is not well understood.

    Luca Turin is the current proponent of the theory that olfaction is at least influenced not only by molecular shape, but also by the vibrational modes and spectra of the molecule. Recent double-blind experiments in March '04 put doubt on this theory, but had no absolute proof of the "shape" theory either. Clouding the whole scientific controversy is the cult-following Turing has acquired following the publication of Chandler Burr's book about Turin, "The Emperor of Scent".

    You can find discussions of this and other theories of smell here.