Slashdot Mirror


Browsing Reality With Sensor Networks

Roland Piquepaille writes "Welcome to the world of 'Reality Mining'! The billions of networked sensors that exist today are generating humongous streams of data. What about 'data mining' this big flow of data and discover our environment in a way that never existed before? Suddenly, sensors would look like pixels and we would start to browse reality as easily as we browse web pages today. Fascinating concept! Some fellows at Accenture Technology Labs are thinking about this and they already have designed some demos of reality mining software. Their demos include web agents, data modeling, GIS systems and much more. They also show how you could detect fires or how you would do virtual shopping. Please read their long article or this shorter summary for a couple of examples."

104 comments

  1. Enveriomental coverage, and monitor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enveriomental coverage, and monitor.
    Everyvody should be able to by monitors of all sorts, they place outside their house, or just walk around with.
    Then we could very precicely monitor the enverioment for changes, and maybe find causes.

  2. This is great, but... by DanthemaninVA1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I started browsing reality around the age of 1, when I learned to WALK.

    1. Re:This is great, but... by darth_MALL · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...while linked to a sophisticated sensor network with colorful node names like "sight", "hearing" and "touch". It just may catch on!

    2. Re:This is great, but... by HalfThat · · Score: 1

      ... now thirty years later you're browsing slashdot...kind of makes you want to get out of your parents' basement and go for a walk, no?

    3. Re:This is great, but... by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

      And I've developed a sophisticated method of mining data from other sensors: it's called talking to people!

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    4. Re:This is great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep every day i see people out in the street at lunch time with a clipboard and pen "data mining" passers-by.

  3. how long before we see a patent application by hopeless+case · · Score: 0, Redundant

    along the lines of:

    "A method of using geographically separated networked sensors to mine data about the physical environment..."

  4. reality mining? by lawngnome · · Score: 0, Troll

    so I dont need a shovel? technology is nifty...

  5. Snowcrash by metlin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That is a really cool idea.

    Did anyone else think of Snowcrash when they saw this? It's almost like the world of Snowcrash super-imposed on reality with all the cool stuff.

    However, this is also ripe for abuse. I can think of so many people who'd want to "hack" into what you see and do weird things (make you see a fire in places where there is not).

    Already, the latest JPEG exploit makes me think of hacking into a system by merely viewing an image - this would make it closer to that reality ;-)

    1. Re:Snowcrash by metaomni · · Score: 1
      It's actually closer to The Light of Other Days by Arthur C. Clarke. Superimposed reality (or, in the case of the book, superimposed images of the past).

      Excelent read, regardless.

    2. Re:Snowcrash by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 1

      "I can think of so many people who'd want to "hack" into what you see and do weird things (make you see a fire in places where there is not)."

      William Gibson - Neuromancer.

      In terms of neuro-linguistic programming, or the visual reprogramming mentioned in Snowcrash, the first time you'll see them will be in either politics or advertising (which are converging rapidly) and you can see the signs already. Which prompts people like myself to get _really_ cynical about the possible uses of this beyond *ahem* the 'cool' factor, which it actually isn't.

      Humans lack the bandwidth to handle a lot of sensory input, and while you can be trained to handle lots of information processing, there is an upper limit. Not only that, but given items like the INDUCE act, it's becoming patently clear that society isn't keeping up with technology in terms of deciding what is and what is not.

      There's one hell of schism hoving into view about the entire concept of 'consent'.

      --
      Oddly Draconis
      Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
  6. Welcome to the World of Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Vague name with 'mining' - check.
    Gratuitous use of the word 'virtual' - check.
    'Shopping' is involved somehow - check.

    Time to go hustle up some VC like it was 1997!

    1. Re:Welcome to the World of Marketing by metlin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What they probably fail to mention is that this would work only for those places that they have "mined" beforehand.

      So, if you are going to a new place, do not expect to have this information - if it's a well known or big place that people frequent and the like, you would have information. Else nothing.

      Good idea, but if it's a well known place you would not really need this thing, anyway.

    2. Re:Welcome to the World of Marketing by pchan- · · Score: 4, Funny

      you're surprised to see this coming from andersen consulting, aka accenture*? they've been virtualising resources, shifting paradigms, and enabling synergies through proactive leveraging of resources for years. now they're mining reality. sure, why the hell not? it's as much bullshit as anything else they do. you know what they say: a consultant is someone who borrows your watch, tells you what time it is, keeps your watch, and bills you for it.

      *pronounced "ass-enter"

    3. Re:Welcome to the World of Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not sure I agree. After all, traveler's guides are popular right now. There are few places in the modern world that people haven't already been too - and those places are by definition not high-traffic or densely urban. Where this is going to be useful is for mirroring the real world in a virtual world, which has lots of tasty implications. The more people live in a place, the denser your amount of information... makes perfect sense for a place that's just a mass hallucination anyway.

    4. Re:Welcome to the World of Marketing by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      a consultant is someone who borrows your watch, tells you what time it is, keeps your watch, and bills you for it.

      I object!

      Not all consultants are created equal! I'm at least nice enough to let you use your watch anytime you like afterwards!

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    5. Re:Welcome to the World of Marketing by hughk · · Score: 1
      Not all consultants are created equal! I'm at least nice enough to let you use your watch anytime you like afterwards!
      I hope that you are billing it though!
      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  7. advermatisming by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

    Suddenly, sensors would look like pixels and we would start to browse reality as easily as we browse web pages today.

    Aacccch! Nooo more advertising! Aaaaarg! Tin foil or no tin foil... don't say i didn't warn you!

  8. Roland Piquepaille writes nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting


    he just takes it, then reposts it for 400$ per advert per month, nice little cashflow for copyright infringment
    do you think sensormag mind him reposting their articles on his website without permission for profit ?
    maybe a C&D would persuade weblogs.com to tighten up ?

    1. Re:Roland Piquepaille writes nothing by erick99 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If he wasn't running all of the ads on his site then he would be okay, for the most part, under "fair use." Running the ads makes his site commercial so he does need permission from copyright holders to reprint/reproduce their work. I have no idea if he does this or not.

      --
      http://www.busyweather.com/
  9. Open Sensors and Privacy by eutychus_awakes · · Score: 4, Informative

    People have been talking about integrating sensor networks like this for a long time. One issue that comes up often is what to do about privacy - especially with regard to image data. You can put a camera on every building in town - and you can be guaranteed that at least one person per day will object to having their picture taken and used for some open-source data fusion project.

    --
    This sig is a test. If this had been an actual sig, you would be reading something quite a bit wittier than this now.
    1. Re:Open Sensors and Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah - no takin' pictures of MY tin-foil hat!

  10. Re:mine mine mine!! mine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Junis! How's the DVD ripping going?

  11. sounds to me like... by Kjuib · · Score: 0, Insightful

    just a new way to sell more porn...

    --
    - Your stupidity got you into this mess, why can't it get you out? -Will Rogers
  12. Total Information Awareness by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The US gov't wants to do this kind of thing, not with sensors but with data from credit cards, libraries, schools, airlines, etc. I haven't been too worried about this so far, considering that we don't have the technology to pull useful data out of all that noise, but if we can do it with sensor networks, who knows. How long until all of those cameras at intersections are hooked up into one all-seeing electronic mind that will always know where you're going and what you do when you get there?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Total Information Awareness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long until all of those cameras at intersections are hooked up into one all-seeing electronic mind

      Who says they're not?

    2. Re:Total Information Awareness by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      so we should stifle the technological development of society becuase an evil government might one day use that tech for "evil"?

      the whole topic reminds me of this book i read by virge? (i googled but i cant remember the name, read it a few years ago). anyways so this guy who manages a galactic empire buys these sensors from an alien government and gets the deployed everywhere. only he doesnt let people know that they are as powerfull as they are. i believe that they are used as stabalizers?? localizers?

      basically what im saying is that it depends on the governement. but if we dont develop things just because an evil government is currently in power, (*cough* bush *cough*), or the tech could possibly be used for "evil", we wouldnt have many of the advancements that we have now.

      limiting science is not the way to go. we should focus on correcting peoples morals and the morals of society instead.

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    3. Re:Total Information Awareness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...one all-seeing electronic mind that will always know where you're going and what you do when you get there?

      We already have non-electronic versions of this. They're called 'Mom'.
  13. Mirrorshades by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    That app is *really* cyberspace. Now we need HMD with projected overlays, marking up optically viewed scenes ("reality"(TM)) with rendered sensor reports. Who's got my goggles?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  14. good greef people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you want to browse reality, just step AWAY from the computer and take a walk outside!

    [/bad humor]

  15. One step closer to movies... by moofdaddy · · Score: 1

    Man, as technology improves it keeps bringing us closer and closer to the technology displayed in movies over the last 20 years.

    A pretty neat application of this would be the ability to create almost that robocop type view of the world with specialy designed contacts or something like that. You walk around and have infomation fed to you about the various objects you see in your reality,

    --
    Be better in bed. Wikiafterdark!
  16. Andersen Consulting Invents Screen Scraper by Exmet+Paff+Daxx · · Score: 1

    Still no word on where all the money went at Worldcom. Film at 11.

    --
    If guns kill people, then CmdrTaco's keyboard misspells words.
    1. Re:Andersen Consulting Invents Screen Scraper by hughk · · Score: 1

      Accenture and Andersen are now quite different organisations. However this should not be taken to imply that either is more competent than the other.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  17. Heh, again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of an article i readon aderkach.
    don't have time to go into tdetails, but, here's the link -- anybody else see the similarity

  18. Accenture? by IronChef · · Score: 0, Troll

    Isn't Accenture the company you hire when you want a really big project screwed up? Cool.

  19. I've always had this idea: by xenostar · · Score: 1

    If we could read the information from molecules or even atoms about the molecules or atoms that are directly next to them and from that, read the same information for the molecules next to those, thus creating a chain, I've always wondered if it would be possible to create a 3d model of the universe, reading it molecule by molecule.

    1. Re:I've always had this idea: by OverlordQ · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually there is such a thing, it goes by the code name T.P.V, thats Total Perspective Vortex.

      For it's starting molecules it uses a piece of fairy cake.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    2. Re:I've always had this idea: by WaterBreath · · Score: 1

      Good luck attaching tiny sensors to all those atoms. That'd be one heckuva small tweezers and dab of heat glue.

      Oh, and good luck getting the atoms and their neighbors to sit still while you ask them about themselves and their neighbors.

      There are just a few laws of physics to surmount before getting excited about this.

    3. Re:I've always had this idea: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Problem is there's no way to store that much information. You can't store information about every atom in the universe because doing so would require every atom in the universe to store it!

      You'd either have to compress the data massively, or, more likely, simulate things on a much larger scale. The most recent universe-scale gravity simulations (too lazy to post a link, check slashdot history) simulate reality by using spheres the size of galaxies.

      As storage density and computational power increase, or as you zoom in on a smaller area, you can increase your resolution so the granularity is better than the galaxy level.

  20. So... by wmaker · · Score: 1

    minesweeper is still going to be included in windows right? I mean, they aren't going to replace minesweeper right... *heart beat* *heart beat*, no, they they they wouldn't.. do that. /me pops 2 painkillers and passeszzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.......

  21. Way Too Cool - Like Minds Think Alike! by _A_Mad_Scientist · · Score: 1

    I have been working on a version of this idea for a long time. It truly is fascinating. Imagine being able to reverse engineer the future based on the largest data cube in the world- the physics and chemistry of the molecules in the world around us. Think of a massive 3D version of the Periodic Table of Elements but applied to molecules and particles. Self-organizing on an immense scale. Imagine if we could see relationships amongst things where today relationships do not exist. I, for one, welcome our Universal Data Cube Overlords.

    --
    Reality is a crutch for people who can't handle lucid dreaming.
  22. Buzzword Bingo?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bloody hell.. Are there any technology buzzwords and corporate bullshit expressions that article didn't use?

    1. Re:Buzzword Bingo?! by erick99 · · Score: 1

      Most articles in that blog are an excercise in mental masturbation. Lately the Slashdot crowd has seemingly been subject to every thing that Roland P. finds important enough to write about. I read this article because it actually did sound interesting. Well, it either isn't interesting (at least to me) or the "writer" did a lousy job. Or both?

      --
      http://www.busyweather.com/
  23. Vernor Vinge anyone? by acsinc · · Score: 1

    Vinge wrote about something like this in "A Deepness in the Sky', only he called them localizers. The bad part is they made the police state more powerful than Orson Wells ever imagined.

  24. DON'T DO IT by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    A virus will start spreading across all computers and then someone will put StarNet online. The next thing you know, naked people will start appearing in big balls of light.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  25. Nodal points by jerometremblay · · Score: 1

    I see nodal points everywhere...

  26. "Please read their long article..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bwahahahahahaha!!!!!

  27. Hmm by RandUser · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this will finally allow geeks the ability to 'browse' girlfriends o_0

    1. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, others' girlfriends, that is.

  28. Roland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one refuse to support Roland Piquepaille by clicking through. Who is with me?

    1. Re:Roland by erick99 · · Score: 1

      You only really support him by clicking ads on his website. Otherwise, you are simply consuming bandwidth which, given how much traffic Slashdot can bring to bear, could actually cost him money. I don't click on the ads.

      --
      http://www.busyweather.com/
  29. Re:Boycott Slashdot! by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I say boycott slashdot until one of the following are met:

    1) We get a Roland Piquepaille section.
    2) Slashdot stops taking kickbacls
    3) Slashdot distributes kickbacks to readers.
    I'd settle for the ability to:
    1: Make Roland Piquepaille a foe
    2: Block my foe's submissions from my view of the front page

    Failing that, howsabout you just ignore his submissions and move on to the next story?
    /me forgot to check the submitter on this one. 'Doh!

    --
    Free gmail invites
  30. Wake me by LordMyren · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wake me when we have effective position location sensors, indoors and out, and the required beacon deployment to be useful most places.

    Until then its all BS.

    Data is useless without context. Position is the best context we have any hope of auto-generating.

    1. Re:Wake me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...indoors and out, and the required bacon deployment to be useful most places."

      mmmm... bacon.

  31. Roland's at it again by Swamii · · Score: 2, Informative

    You guys do know this is a hoax, right?

    --
    Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
  32. Yeah, it's Roland the Plogger again by Animats · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is getting really annoying. Either put the bozo in his own section or stop posting his stupid ads. Or at least edit them to reference the original story, not the Plogged version. This is like being subscribed to PR Newswire.

    1. Re:Yeah, it's Roland the Plogger again by TarlCabbot · · Score: 0

      Just counted (yeah, just a little bored) 125 sucsessful submitions in one year!

  33. Some stuff by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    We need a camera that digitizes real life into an online 3d map.

    With GPS on a cellphone with a mapping program like mapsonus, and a bus schedule, you could find where you want to go fast. Or how about a cellphone with a cab pager button.

    I like finding resturants within a certain radius, like some devices do gas stations. Eventually events could be plotted on the devices too, so you could attend or not. Lots of stuff can be done, but only a little is done here and there.

    God spoke with me:
    www.geocities.com/James_Sager_PA/love3.html

  34. Umm...that's George Orwell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...not Orson Wells.


    Perhaps it'll have a Rosebud option?

    1. Re:Umm...that's George Orwell... by acsinc · · Score: 1

      Damn, I hate when that happens..

  35. "Becoming" connected by eseiat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From the article:
    As cameras become a standard cell phone feature, we're becoming the most connected and instrumented people in history.
    How are we merely becoming the most connected people? I don't remember seeing Caesar cruising through Rome, telling all his "boys" to "holla back at a brotha on my 2-Way, cause I'm a roll out to Cairo for a weekend dip in the Nile". Perhaps that is information that my public school budgets couldn't afford to dig up.

  36. When Will Someone Replace Slashdot by Zebbers · · Score: 1

    It cant be that hard...minus all this ronald and slashvertisement bullshit.

  37. woah by Teraflops · · Score: 1

    *waits for the obligatory comment about the matrix being too information-dense to viualize, except as symbols*

    1. Re:woah by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      I was going to mention that, but you beat me to it. I'll just switch off my extra screens now so you don't get distracted by them.

  38. It's missing something... by Intocabile · · Score: 1

    I just don't see this taking off without incorporating porn somehow.

  39. Summary of Next 50 Posts by deliciousmonster · · Score: 2, Funny


    - Outcry From Tinfoil Hat Brigade
    - I Welcome Our New Lamp Post Overlords
    - Maybe We Can Beowulf These Sensors
    - This Will Finally Finish SCO Off
    - Something About Soviet Russia
    - A Groklaw Link Saying "We Filed Suit Against It Three Weeks Ago"
    - I Voted For Kodos

    Repeat Above In Random Order Until...
    Profit!

    --
    I have a plan. Using mainly spoons, we'll tunnel our way out of the city...
    1. Re:Summary of Next 50 Posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow you pointed out some of the common phrases and running jokes of slashdot. YOU MUST COME HERE OFTEN

      HAHAHAHA wasnt that funny??? you forgot that one.

      why there is no -6 fucking unoriginal, simplistic, cliched, karama WHORE sodomite punk ass 16 year old bitch mod i will never know

    2. Re:Summary of Next 50 Posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You totally missed the most common one:

      - I'm jealous of Roland Piquepaille so I'm going to whine about his weblog.

  40. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  41. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  42. Chaos Theory (Law) by airrage · · Score: 1

    This is Chaos Theory 101 if I'm not correct (INAM::I'm not a mathematician)? The class CT example is having weather scensors 100 feet covering the earth and still storm prediction would be impossible due to small variations of unpredicatability.

    So if someones says something about dinosours on an island, just remember I told you so ...

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
    1. Re:Chaos Theory (Law) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (INAM::I'm not a mathematician)
      and it shows

      It is impossible to predict exactly everything that will happen without knowing exactly how things are at one moment in time and knowing exactly how conditions evolve. And even then, Heisenberg uncertainty guarantees that you don't know.

      That said, you should know that just because perfect prediction of eternity is impossible doesn't mean that increasing the accuracy of our sensor arrays and weather models won't improve storm predictions.

      It is a comically poor reading of chaos theory to suggest that minor variations can have immediate major effects. What chaos theory means is that even in the classical model of a perfectly deterministic universe, any ignored effects and rounding errors will add up, not linearly but exponentially, thereby invalidating simulations much sooner than scientists had thought before chaos theory.

      -sigh- two things can happen when mathematics becomes the subject of a Hollywood movie: a mathematically insane movie or a movie about an insane mathematician

  43. It's Never Going to Happen Because of You People by The-Bus · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I've been thinking about this for a while. What if you could, for lack of a better term, Google the earth? That's a bit broad, and excuse the ca. 1994 AT&T "You Will" commercial-speak...
    • You listen to a song on the radio, and then search for a match from what your brain just heard (and was stored on a portable audio device) with a world database of songs.
    • You see a person you recognize and are able to get their name, last time you talked to them, etc.
    • You can take a look at all this data and have software come up with weird trends or coincidences ("Heinz! Your ketchup sells better a week after a victory by the local football team!").


    The problem is of course that people are against this. I, for one, do not have a problem as long as it's easily accessible public information. Think back to 20 years ago. What would you say if your next-door neighbor had our present time internet, with access to public records, opinions, sports cores, etc. etc. etc. We take it for granted now because everyone can do it.

    I think this is probably what will cause the singularity.
    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  44. Vernor Vinge, A Deepness in the Sky by EaglesNest · · Score: 1

    If you want to read a world where nanites with audio/video form a supercomping net that anyone can access to invade anyone else's privacy, then you need to read this book. This is really searching reality. Frighteningly, the technology for this is probably less than a few decades away.

    1. Re:Vernor Vinge, A Deepness in the Sky by mr+i+want+to+go+home · · Score: 1
      It does already exist (though not to such a refined extent). There was a slashdot article not long ago on a computer/sensor network full of nodes, who's individual sizes were about 50 cubic mm or so. The nodes were monitoring a island ecosystem IIRC.

      I'm late for work now, so maybe some other Slashdotter with a good memory can find a link to the story for you.

      Frightening and a little exciting at the same time, indeed.

  45. Very realistic and funny quote by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    This part of your reply really amused me:

    Also, standards-compliance will be impossible to implement: show me ten different temperature sensors and I'll show you 12 different ways of handling the data.

    Very well put, and funny to boot! I lik ethe idea too but it's a lot harder than it might seem on the surface when you start working with real, physical, sensors.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  46. Re:Boycott Slashdot! by bhsx · · Score: 1

    I was just thinking that the editors had actually caught on. That they had started ignoring this ass-hat's submissions.
    Bzzt. Wrong.
    Could Roland be a pseudonym for Jon Katz???
    Can we get him fired too???
    PLEASE?

    --
    put the what in the where?
  47. No, you want EDS for that. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    The UK government have been using them to royally sqrew up projects for decades. The US government seem to prefer CSC for that, so I'm not sure who's the market leader in fucking up big IT projects at the moment.

    --
    Deleted
  48. Research and Lab Philosophies by Christopher+Anthony · · Score: 1
    Google Labs comes up with lots of neat stuff, but it's not research, it's all practical product stuff.

    Microsoft Research is well respected and does lots of original research, but has a focus on stuff that can be applied. As Clippy has shown, their ideas aren't always good, though.

    IBM Research does lots of cool research that ranges from applied stuff for new products to basic scientific research in many different fields.

    Accenture Technology Labs researches new buzzwords and how they can be applied to things that other people have already done. They are very good at realizing the maximal rate of return of their innovations for their corporate parent on the going forward path, though.

  49. Re:Another one for the trash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    the submitter couldnt give a shit about the content, its all about getting you (& 50,000 /.ers) to visit the article and create impressions for advertising, thats the whole purpose of the site, the guy just copy and pastes whole articles vertabim and then doesnt have to pay the writer like other sites
    weblogs.com are turning a blind eye as they just havent had a lawyer pissed off at them yet to shut them down
    of course time will tell, in the meantime its payday! thank you for playing, keep clicking dumbass !

  50. Family Guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Can I buy some pot from you?"

  51. MOD PARENT UP! by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Although this is a cool idea, it's dangerous too. You know how you get all upset with cookies and spyware? Well, this can (and probably will, sooner or later) lead to the same thing in real life. Imagine running out of milk and being bombarded with Mayfield ads everywhere you go.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  52. Not VC but "dumb-fsck mining" by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    VC mining was my immediate reaction too. With all those "reality TV" shows out there, "reality" is an instant catch-phrase too.

    People have been connecting sensors to the internet etc for a long time. Most small microcontroller companies (eg. Microchip) have been promoting this kind of thing for many years.

    In short there's nothing new here technically - just a marketeer with a new tie and jacket.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  53. Just a hop, skip, and a jump fro Gibson's Slitscan by fernd1 · · Score: 1

    Scatter these sensors around Hollywood, and use the software to search for nodal influences in the Celeb world, and you have Slitscan. Though, I can't wait to see the "average" consumer.

    "Which is to say, [Laney], anything that might be of interest to Slitscan's audience. Which is best visualized as a vicious, lazy, profoundly ignorant, perpetually hungry organism craving the warm god-flesh of the anoited. Personally I like to imagine something the size of a baby hippo, the color of a week-old boiled potato, that lives by itself, in the dark, in a double-wide on the outskirts of Topeka. It's covered with eyes and sweats constantly. The sweat runs info those eyes and makes them sting. It has no mouth, [Laney], no genitals, and can only express its mute extremes of murderous rage and infantile desire by changing the channels on a universal remote. Or by voting in presidental elections."

    Idoru, William Gibson

  54. Jealous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aw, is that green coming from Slashdot or from your face?

  55. Re:Another one for the trash by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    While I agree that roland is a useless douchebag there is some merit to making assorted sensors free for open use. If you make yours open, and the next guy does too, you can use each other's sensors and you both benefit.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  56. Re:Boycott Slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I say boycott slashdot until one of the following are met:

    1) We get a Roland Piquepaille section.
    2) Slashdot stops taking kickbacls
    3) Slashdot distributes kickbacks to readers.


    That would be nice! I mean the part about you folks boycotting slashdot. I mean you folks who are under the delusion that slashdot takes kickbacks... With you folks gone, the signal-to-noise ratio should increase dramatically and we'll be back to the good old days.

    So yes please! Boycott slashdot forever!

  57. Hype by mdavids · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or does this read like a press release?

    Is it just me, or has Slashdot been posting quite a few articles lately that involve nothing more than a large company and vague intimations of something related to technology going on there?

  58. Completely un-obligatory Simpsons by Zeebs · · Score: 1


    McBain: Zee Goggles! ZEY DO NOTHING!

    --

    Happy Noodle Boy says "F###ing doughnut! Mock me? You fried cyclops!!"
  59. Obfuscation.. by bigattichouse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and hiding will become an artform.. because no one will believe that something could actually *hide* from the sensor web... So hidden things will be very well hidden indeed once you assume that they cannot exist.

    --
    meh
  60. Potential Astroturf Solutions by sbszine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Quite a few Slashdot readers think Roland Piquepaille (rpiquepa is exploiting this site as a way of upping his ad impressions. There's a strong argument that he wants to turn the Slashdot effect into ad money, and this is supported by the habit he has of linking not to the article, but to a verbatim copy posted on his ad-supported blog. Engadget (ptorrone) are pretty dubious too, but at least they bother to write their own content.

    Having said that, I don't think Roland etc are bribing the /. editors, and I don't necessarily think that their submissions should be rejected. Whether they are astroturf or not is up to the individual reader to decide, and some people seem to enjoy them. What I would like to see is the ability to let the individual block submissions from particular users somehow, either as a subscription feature (block by UID / foes list), or a Firefox extension (based on NukeAnything perhaps).

    And I no, I don't have the time / skillset / influence to code the above myself. I'm just putting some ideas out for discussion.

    --

    Vino, gyno, and techno -Bruce Sterling

  61. Roland's UID by sbszine · · Score: 1

    Roland's UID is rpiquepa -- that should get you started : )

    --

    Vino, gyno, and techno -Bruce Sterling

  62. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some people have been spending WAY too much time with their butt parked in front of a computer screen. If you want to browse reality, get up off your flabby fat ass and GO OUTSIDE.

    you geeks could stand to get some sun anyway.

  63. Real world operational sensor networks.... by bretberger · · Score: 2, Informative

    No catch phrase bullsh!t here:

    http://www.ewcd.org/ - about 80 remote monitoring stations updated hourly.

    http://www.sevierriver.org/ - something similar

  64. Accenture leads in creative thinking by hughk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    on how to pick the pockets of their clients. I have just rolled off a(nother) major project that they screwed up. The offshored it to their own delivery centre in Manila and I guess the project plan was a result of mining the imagination and the offshore delivery centre was full of virtual resources.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  65. Prototype? Accenture? = Vaporware and Hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this is anything like other Accenture prototypes I've seen, there is absolutely *nothing* there.

    This looks to me like a couple of photos, crudely touched up in Paintshop or something, accompanied by a press release, and a shopping list of products that maybe, just maybe could be integrated (at great expense) to do something vaguely like what's in the mocked-up photos

    At least that's the extent of the "research" Accenture usually do - in other words nothing at all, no exploration, no IT work of any description, nada, zero.

  66. Next generation car navigation help by wuonm · · Score: 1
    It's just as I imagine navigation help for vehicles in 5 to 10 years. With this huge sensor network and the *exact* position of your car and your head you will be able to see in the windscreen signals and messages over the real image.

    Every passenger will see a custom view upon his vision angle to the windscreen and his profile (you looking for bars and traffic directions while your wife look for shops)

    It's a question of data mining and calibration.

    <w/>

    --

    w|m