Slashdot Mirror


Google Launches Google Print

Rescate writes "As reported by Reuters,Google is launching Google Print, which will show book excerpts next to regular Google search results. A spokesman said, "We're trying to index every book there is, and make it searchable for our users." Even though this competes with Amazon's A9 search which also searches within books, Google says the two companies will continue to work together, and that Google Print will link to Amazon, as well as other sellers, to buy books listed in the search results. Google will demonstrate the technology Thursday, Oct. 7 at the Frankfurt Book Fair."

14 of 245 comments (clear)

  1. See also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:See also... by generic-man · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Google Sets came up with a list of common shampoo ingredients (?) after I seeded it with the four active ingredients in Pert Plus.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  2. hold up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    so many google features, why no porn.google.com? :o(

  3. Gutenberg by Ryan+Stortz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Will Google by any chance be using any of Project Gutenberg's texts?

    --
    Bugs are just features that have been fixed.
  4. Re:Musty Libraries a Thing of the Past? by Planky · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I believe books themselves will never die, ebooks are great as a delivery service and are incredibly useful for research - but it won't ever extend to novels and the like. So certain aspects of the libraries we know today wont exist - but a large part of it will.

  5. Re:Musty Libraries a Thing of the Past? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, from a small university press point of view, I think this technology is great. Sure, you can see a few pages from one of our books, but if the subject is interesting and the book is useful, we're hoping people buy the whole thing. This doesn't make us redundant, it gives us another way to market books. Since many of our books are very specialized, (think monograph), it can be difficult to get them to the people who need the information.

  6. A Plagiarist's Dilemma by lavar78 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    On one hand, this is going to make it much easier for plagiarists. OTOH, it's going to make it much easier to catch them.

    --
    "Dave, I stand still--the conclusions jump to me!" - Bill McNeal, NewsRadio
  7. The publishers are adamantly against this by j.+andrew+rogers · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From the standpoint of the publishers (and my girlfriend is a national sales manager for one of the very large publishers), this idea is incredibly bad and they have been extremely resistant to it. Amazon has been trying to push this for years without success, and it seems that now Google is getting in on the game. Or maybe Amazon is trying to use Google as additional weight to try and break the stubbornness of the publishers.

    The problem, ultimately, is that showing the page you are looking for, plus or minus two pages, is often all the pages you need to see for a great many bookes e.g. books that are randomly accessed in a reference fashion. As an example of this, my girlfriend routinely searches cookbooks online using this very feature. It shows her the recipe she was looking for from an expensive cookbook, and plus or minus a couple pages, which means she gets the entire recipes -- the primary benefit of the book -- online for free. And she uses this as an example of why her publishing houses won't participate.

    For STM publishers and similar, 90% of their product line could be used this way. Letting Amazon (or Google) give away book content in a searchable format five pages at a time would dramatically eat into their sales without generating any revenue. Most of the books you do see in this system are either 1) books from minor publishers too stupid to have thought this through, or 2) a very short list of throwaway books from major publishers to prove to Amazon and themselves that it actually eats sales rather than driving them -- the consensus of the publishing industry. It would have died a long time ago except that it is the pet project of someone high up in Amazon.

    1. Re:The publishers are adamantly against this by sparkmanC · · Score: 5, Interesting

      prove to Amazon and themselves that it actually eats sales rather than driving them

      Actually, having books online for browsing increases sales. Just think about going to the book store and paging through a book before you buy it... You are much less likely to buy a book that is shrink-wrapped, because you have no idea of the quality of the book.

  8. Re:Good for google... by jerometremblay · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why should you consult different places to search for different kinds of data? What google tries to achieve is to be your Unique Source of Answers, your first and last stop.

    One single unified interface to find anything you might think of. This is the ultimate goal of Google.

    It's good for the user because it's easy to learn.

    It's even better for Google, who litteraly ends up re-branding the whole world.

  9. Re:great... by el-spectre · · Score: 5, Insightful

    nonsense... Do you have any idea how easy it would be to write a random (but still using real words) text generator? A few lines in your scripting language of choice should be enough.

    Or should we also stop using text for the content on web pages? Should slashdot convert all text to PNGs?
    (and how long until OCR makes that useless anyway?)

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  10. See for your self by mishmash · · Score: 5, Informative
  11. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  12. Re:Google is really stretching it ... by Lshmael · · Score: 5, Informative

    But for anyone doing more than storing recipes, you need a proper desktop search engine, or even just an email search engine.

    And of course, your endorsement of aforementioned products would not have anything to do with being the CEO of the company that makes them, right?