Google Launches Google Print
Rescate writes "As reported by Reuters,Google is launching Google Print, which will show book excerpts next to regular Google search results. A spokesman said, "We're trying to index every book there is, and make it searchable for our users." Even though this competes with Amazon's A9 search which also searches within books, Google says the two companies will continue to work together, and that Google Print will link to Amazon, as well as other sellers, to buy books listed in the search results. Google will demonstrate the technology Thursday, Oct. 7 at the Frankfurt Book Fair."
Google Betas Google Print
so many google features, why no porn.google.com? :o(
Will Google by any chance be using any of Project Gutenberg's texts?
Bugs are just features that have been fixed.
I believe books themselves will never die, ebooks are great as a delivery service and are incredibly useful for research - but it won't ever extend to novels and the like. So certain aspects of the libraries we know today wont exist - but a large part of it will.
Actually, from a small university press point of view, I think this technology is great. Sure, you can see a few pages from one of our books, but if the subject is interesting and the book is useful, we're hoping people buy the whole thing. This doesn't make us redundant, it gives us another way to market books. Since many of our books are very specialized, (think monograph), it can be difficult to get them to the people who need the information.
On one hand, this is going to make it much easier for plagiarists. OTOH, it's going to make it much easier to catch them.
"Dave, I stand still--the conclusions jump to me!" - Bill McNeal, NewsRadio
The problem, ultimately, is that showing the page you are looking for, plus or minus two pages, is often all the pages you need to see for a great many bookes e.g. books that are randomly accessed in a reference fashion. As an example of this, my girlfriend routinely searches cookbooks online using this very feature. It shows her the recipe she was looking for from an expensive cookbook, and plus or minus a couple pages, which means she gets the entire recipes -- the primary benefit of the book -- online for free. And she uses this as an example of why her publishing houses won't participate.
For STM publishers and similar, 90% of their product line could be used this way. Letting Amazon (or Google) give away book content in a searchable format five pages at a time would dramatically eat into their sales without generating any revenue. Most of the books you do see in this system are either 1) books from minor publishers too stupid to have thought this through, or 2) a very short list of throwaway books from major publishers to prove to Amazon and themselves that it actually eats sales rather than driving them -- the consensus of the publishing industry. It would have died a long time ago except that it is the pet project of someone high up in Amazon.
Why should you consult different places to search for different kinds of data? What google tries to achieve is to be your Unique Source of Answers, your first and last stop.
One single unified interface to find anything you might think of. This is the ultimate goal of Google.
It's good for the user because it's easy to learn.
It's even better for Google, who litteraly ends up re-branding the whole world.
nonsense... Do you have any idea how easy it would be to write a random (but still using real words) text generator? A few lines in your scripting language of choice should be enough.
Or should we also stop using text for the content on web pages? Should slashdot convert all text to PNGs?
(and how long until OCR makes that useless anyway?)
"Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
Click here to see some google print results.
UK Laptops
Comment removed based on user account deletion
But for anyone doing more than storing recipes, you need a proper desktop search engine, or even just an email search engine.
And of course, your endorsement of aforementioned products would not have anything to do with being the CEO of the company that makes them, right?