Slashdot Mirror


Car With A Mind Of Its Own -- Part 2

An anonymous reader writes "As a sequel to the previous Slashdot story where a car 'began accelerating to 120 mph on its own', Renault (the car manufacturer) has examined the supposed faulty car, and as many of us have suspected, no anomaly has been found (google translation). Renault will initiate a court action to discover the truth about the matter. Read more about it here (translation)."

52 of 707 comments (clear)

  1. Knight Rider by kpogoda · · Score: 4, Funny

    Was the name of the car KIT? :)

    1. Re:Knight Rider by VendettaMF · · Score: 5, Funny

      /s/Automatic/Automated

      I watched more. :-P

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  2. Yeah... by jargoone · · Score: 4, Informative

    No anomaly found? Of course not. This guy is full of shit, plain and simple. A similar problem almost put Audi out of business in the 80's because of a "story" on 60 Minutes. These people were just as full of shit as this guy.

    How many people actually know someone that is a competent driver that has had this happen?

    Linky to the Audi story here (google's first result): http://www.auto123.com/en/info/news/news,view.spy? artid=22184&pg=1

    1. Re:Yeah... by kerry-buckley · · Score: 4, Insightful
      How many people actually know someone that is a competent driver that has had this happen?
      I had my (purely mechanical) throttle stick open once, but it took about two seconds to realise what was going on and switch the ignition off.

      I've heard people in these situations before saying "but I couldn't cut the engine, otherwise the servo brakes/power steering wouldn't work!". Right, so driving for miles at full throttle is far better than taking a few extra yards to stop.

    2. Re:Yeah... by gfxguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I read the linked story and found it quite interesting... ...helped along by fabricated TV coverage courtesy of the CBS news show 60 Minutes.

      Deja-vu all over again. Why do people bother watching this show?

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    3. Re:Yeah... by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Funny

      A similar problem almost put Audi out of business in the 80's because of a "story" on 60 Minutes

      Yes, but it did give rise to the funniest automotive acronym I've ever heard:

      AUDI - Accelerates Under Demonic Influence.

      Right up there with:

      Fiat: Fix it again, Tony!

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    4. Re:Yeah... by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 5, Interesting

      When I lived in Phoenix, there was a woman who had her Hyundai accelerate out of control. She was blowing through red lights, barely managing to keep her car under control. The police were trying to clear traffic ahead of her, and finally one got in front of her and used his brakes to slow her car down. It was a frightening event, and everyone was just happy that the woman was safe, and that she hadn't killed anyone else.

      And then, it happened again. Turns out she was just an attention whore, and nothing was wrong with her Hyundai.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    5. Re:Yeah... by w42w42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Can't say :)

      I had thought it was 60 Minutes, but it was apparently DateLine that fabrictaed a story about exploding General Motors trucks in the 80's. They wanted to do a story on trucks exploding when in collisions - the only problem they had was that they didn't. So they undid the gas caps, poured fuel all over the place, inserted a detonator or two, you get the idea. They lost the court case pretty convincingly when GM sued

      Corporations selling product lying to me is bad enough - but I recognize that there's a motive there for them to do so, and why. News organizations shoveling crap for ratings though is another ball of wax. These people should go to jail.

  3. Sounds Familiar by YodaToo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Anyone remember the Audi disputes in the 80's where people kept claiming they randomly accelerated when the brakes were appled? I think it turned out that the accelerator and brake were too close together and people were hitting the gas pedal instead of the brake.

    1. Re:Sounds Familiar by Delta-9 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I think it turned out that the accelerator and brake were too close together and people were hitting the gas pedal instead of the brake."

      You are correct, that is exactly what was happening. Audi went ahead and made the stupid move to put more distance between the gas pedal and the brake pedal for the idiots over here in the US that have fat asses and feet.

    2. Re:Sounds Familiar by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Insightful
      That would strike me as still being a design flaw, just not the one the complainers initially thought it was.

      I recall the major issues concerning the Airbus A320 in the late eighties. There were a number of unexplained crashes and accidents, and both the pilots and Airbus were at loggerheads because Airbus couldn't see any fault with the software and had done everything possible to make it reliable, and the pilots - including survivors of actual incidents - believed the planes had gone totally out of control.

      Well, it turned out that at least one of the issues had to do with circumstances in which both pilot and plane dealt with a problem without taking into account the other's actions. As an example, if the plane tilted to the right a little too far, the plane would immediately tilt it back. The problem was so would the pilot, and the two together would over-compensate and the plane would end up dangerously tilting left. So the pilot and plane would then do exactly the same thing in the other direction. Pilot assumes plane is out of control. Plane is just trying to correct the "dumb" pilot. Result, in some cases actual disasters.

      Designers have a habit of looking at designs purely in terms of a control panel hooked up to a device. However, the control panel is an interface to a device - a human being - not the end-point of the design, and designers need to be more careful to ensure that the fact a human being will be a part of the system is taken into account, at all stages of the design. Airbus, of course, can be forgiven for being one of the first to encounter a problem with this.

      Whether this is relevent to the Renault incident is open to question.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:Sounds Familiar by Detritus · · Score: 3, Informative
      Didn't they also have some user interface problems on their flight management system and autopilot? I remember watching some demonstrations of how the system could confuse a pilot and end up doing something very different than what was intended by the pilot.

      Airbus also seemed to be very quick to blame all incidents on pilot error, before all the facts were in.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    4. Re:Sounds Familiar by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I recall an aircraft demonstrated at Farnborough way back when fly by wire was a new buzzword. The pilot had been told that the plane was completely idiot proof, so he decided to test this by instructing it to raise the undercarriage on the runway. Apparently the designers hadn't imagined anyone would be quite that stupid, and he totalled the plane.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Sounds Familiar by Alioth · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't believe that story for a second. Firstly, "squat switches" (anti-retraction switches) have been standard equipment on even light planes for decades before fly by wire. The ancient Piper Apache (built in the late 50s) that I did my multiengine rating in has a simple hydraulic valve for the sole purpose of preventing accidental gear retraction on the ground.

      Secondly, "gearing up" a plane will not total it - even landing a plane and forgetting to put the wheels down. It does surprisingly little damage (belly skins, bent props and flaps - but not much else). A brand new plane would be repaired. Even old planes that are accidentally landed with the wheels up are repaired.

  4. This is a fancy way of saying... by tkrotchko · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is a fancy way of saying "The guy is lying".

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:This is a fancy way of saying... by gfxguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I personally believe the guy was full of it, on the other hand it is also standard operating procedure to deny liability first and then investigate.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  5. Blame what you don't understand by NicolaiBSD · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In Holland we had a similar case, a drunk driver who killed a pedestrian in a parking garage (while driving drunk) claimed his cruise control malfunctioned and he couldn't stop the car.
    Whenever people need to lie to protect themselves, they'll try to blame something they don't understand, expecting that the recipient of the story will not understand the stuff either, and thus believe them.

    Ofcourse this is rather stupid, but it's just the way people are wired.

    1. Re:Blame what you don't understand by Delirium+Tremens · · Score: 5, Informative
      Irrelevant. If you had read the story, you would have learnt that
      • the driver was not drunk;
      • he actually called the police while driving at 200 Km/h to ask for help;
      • he had not been ticketed before the call or caught by any police radar that would have made him want to pull that stunt to cover his speeding excess;
      • he eventually managed to disconnect controls to the car so that it finally and slowly cruised to a stop on the emergency lane.
      Yes, the driver might still be lying about the all thing, but, if so, it was not to cover any known misdoing. On the contrary.
    2. Re:Blame what you don't understand by flibuste · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you had read the other story, you read that:

      Selon LCI, le conducteur avait déjà été condamné pour état d'ivresse et excès de vitesse, son permis lui avait été retiré durant 4 ans.

      Translation:According to LCI [a TV Channel], the driver has already been prosecuted for drunken driving and over-speeding, and his license cancelled for 4 years

      This guy sounds like a dangerous idiot who is trying to protect his but with a fake story.

      It also sounds like the media picked up HIS story first without fact-checking. Same thing happened with a woman in the Paris subway who claimed she and her baby were attacked by "anti-semites". Her story went first page in most of the newspapers, people started shouting against the insecurity in France, "anti-semitisme" and all sort of non-sense. It turned out she was mythomaniac and made up the whole story.

  6. Machines going wild by yogan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh great, a car going on rampage. As if drunken and irresponsible humans didn't make the streets unsafe enough already.

  7. If he was making it up.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do you expect that if he was making it up he would have offered to have the car inspected by the auto maker? He could have taken it right down to his local mechanic.

    The quicker they can cover it up the better, or in this case maybe burry it in the court system? Talk about a recall to end recalls.

    Just my 2cents.

  8. Happened to my wife a few months ago by Enry · · Score: 5, Interesting

    She escaped with only burned out brake calipers.

    The fault was a bit of grit or buildup preventing the throttle from closing properly.

    Keep your air filter clean and don't buy junk gas.

    1. Re:Happened to my wife a few months ago by Enry · · Score: 3, Informative

      Maybe I should back up and tell more of the tale.

      By first instinct, she hit the brakes (she was doing city driving), which then burnt. She then figured out what was going on and shifted into park and killed the engine. She didn't go all that far after she discovered what was going on (brakes were due to be changed anyway).

      I never saw the symptoms, and the air filter was due for a change, so the bet was something got through the air filter.

    2. Re:Happened to my wife a few months ago by Technician · · Score: 4, Informative

      Turning the key off was not preferred as it locks the steering wheel on most cars causing a loss of control.

      I drove stick cars for many years. My first was a beetle and my latest a Mustang. I had a throttle stick once (broken spring) and I didn't want to blow the engine. Plan ahead on what to do. Pratice it. I calmly turned the key one click only. Problem solved. Nothing broken.

      Newer automatic cars are even simpler. Turn the key off. It won't go into lock until you put the shift in park. They do that on new cars so they won't roll away if you forget to put it in park as it keeps you from removing the keys. To get your keys out, you have to put it in park and then lock the steering. Only then can the keys be removed.

      Try it. Shut off the car in your driveway but leave it in nutral or in drive. Try to lock the steering and remove your key.. There are only a few cars that let you remove your key without locking the transmission and steering.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  9. Never underestimate... by copperheadclgp · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...the power of one lying bastard when given media attention. Once upon a time, when I was young and foolish, my best friend and I contrieved a scheme to get out of a speeding ticket. We figured that if we were caught roaring past a speed trap, we could just continue, and call 911 to get them to clear the road. Then we could get to a safe area, spin out in a huge cloud of dust and praise be to god, we'd be OK. Of course, this would hinge on us being able to convice the cops and investigators, that we weren't actually maniacs. Like I said, when I was young and foolish.

  10. Just because no problem was found... by sxltrex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...doesn't mean there wasn't a problem. Anybody remember the Therac-25 radiation machine? After a few incidents it was examined and the first couple of times no fault was found. However, after much closer inspection they found that under just the right circumstances, if things were done in just the right order, bad things would happen. And this is a Renault we're talking about.

    Of course, I still think it was user error...

    1. Re:Just because no problem was found... by twiddlingbits · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://sunnyday.mit.edu/papers/therac.pdf is the work on the Therac-25 problems by Nancy Leveson. If you have ever worked with software for embedded/control/fault tolerant systems you know her name. She pretty much invented the area of Software Risk Analysis. I don't doubt her explanation of the issue. Maybe Renault needs to hire her to find out IF or WHAT really happened. IIRC, she is at MIT now.

  11. Obviously, I believe Renault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    There is clearly nothing wrong with the vehicle. Anyway, how could the company that brought you LeCar ever do wrong?

  12. Bit like Airbus by reality-bytes · · Score: 5, Interesting


    If you remember that Airbus that crashed at an airshow a few years back when it's Die-By-Wire flight-controls refused to give the pilot TOGA power.

    That accident was put down to pilot-error by Airbus and the French (Government) Investigators. The case has now been re-opened on the merit that the CVR and FDR data seems to have been played with.

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:Bit like Airbus by hoofie · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I recall seeing a documentary on this a few years ago. They looked at the FDR outputs and comapared the time-lag between the pilots inputs and the control response.

      Once the pilot realised he was making an arse of it [he was low and slow, even for a demo - he has passengers for god's sake], he requested TOGA [To-Go-Around if I'm correct] power from the engines and put some back pressure on the side-controller. The engines started to spool up [you can hear it on the video of the crash], but the elevators refused to respond for a number of seconds - the flight computers were in landing mode and as far as they concerned they saw an unsafe input. So they said 'Non'. By the time the elevators started to respond to the pilot input, he was in the trees and sadly, people died.

    2. Re:Bit like Airbus by Alioth · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, that's completely incorrect.

      The aircraft did give the pilot TOGA power (take off/go around power), but the aircraft was ALREADY so far behind the "power curve" (i.e. in the region of the flight envelope where slowing down actually induces MORE drag - if you want to find out more google for a drag/airspeed diagram - unlike ground vehicles, the curve has a "back side" for aircraft where induced drag increases as speed decreases) that it was simply against the laws of physics for the pilot to extricate himself from the pickle he'd put himself in.

      It takes several seconds for a turbofan engine to "spool up". Unlike a small piston engine which can go from idle to maximum rated power almost instantly, a turbofan engine takes several seconds to go from a low power setting to takeoff power. There's an awful lot of inertia in the many turbine and compressor discs. (Modern jet engines are much better than the first generation ones, but they still take time to get up to speed).

      The pilot did ask for takeoff thrust. However, by the time the engines did reach takeoff thrust (they actually performed slightly better than spec) the tail of the aircraft - which was already in a nose-high attitude because of the angle of attack needed to fly as slowly as he was flying - was already striking the trees at the end of the airfield. The additional drag of pulling the empennage through the trees overcame the thrust of the engines, and the plane slowed further causing it to impact more trees, adding more drag, slowing the plane further, until the final impact with terrain.

      The pilot was ENTIRELY at fault. The same thing would have happened if he was flying a Boeing 727 ('Jurassic Jet') with the same kind of flight profile. He tried to violate the laws of physics and lost. The overall record of the Airbus A320 series shows that calling it "die by wire" is pure, unadulterated inaccurate hyperbole.

    3. Re:Bit like Airbus by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Some of these systems seem so easy to implement too- I mean how hard can it be to put a sensor in front of the car and sense if you are approaching an object at a speed that you will soon not be able to avoid a collision?

      It's really hard, actually. At highway speed, you're covering about 30 meters (100 feet) per second. To stop, you're looking at probably three times that distance or more.

      Do you want your car to activate its emergency braking system every time it approaches a hill? Will it understand that a guardrail a hundred feet in front of you is okay because you fully intend to follow a curve?

      An alarm to notify drivers that they're going to lane change into the side of the car in their blind spot could be managed, but avoiding objects on the road ahead is a fiendishly difficult problem.

      Incidentally, if you're following closely enough that hard braking by the car in front will cause a collision before you can respond, then you're following too closely. Back off and/or slow down.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  13. This is nothing by Timesprout · · Score: 3, Funny

    Every full moon my friend lives in fear of his life as his Were-car tries to kill him.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  14. The official Renault press Release in English by zakkie · · Score: 5, Informative

    FYI, from their media site:

    After one of its vehicles is incriminated

    RENAULT TAKES LEGAL ACTION

    Under the control of an independent court-authorized expert appointed by Renault and with the
    consent of the customer, Renault evaluated the Renault Vel Satis 3L Dci automatic, registration
    number 218 TH 18, in static and dynamic conditions on Wednesday October 6.

    According to the driver's comments as reported in the media, the car was jammed at high speed
    on the A71 motorway on Sunday October 3, due to a faulty cruise control. The driver reportedly
    said that it was impossible for him to stop the car after trying different possibilities for almost an
    hour.

    The evaluation covered all the vehicle's electronic, mechanical and hydraulic functions. The
    data collected and the facts as established reveal no malfunction. The braking system, which
    shows no sign of abnormal wear, the gearbox control, the powertrain and the cruise control all
    worked perfectly. A full detailed report is expected very shortly.

    Given the findings of the evaluation and its concern about the impact this incident might have on
    its product image, Renault has decided to take legal action in the form of a summary
    proceeding, without prejudice to other actions taken in compensation for any damage suffered
    by the company.

  15. Obligatory Father Ted Quote: by tiluki · · Score: 5, Funny

    DOUGAL: Can I stay up tonight to watch the scary film?
    TED: Ah, no no no. The last time you stayed up to watch a scary film, you ended up having to sleep in my bed. I wouldn't mind, but it wasn't even a scary film.
    DOUGAL: Come on, Ted. A Volkswagen with a mind of its own. Driving all over the place and going mad. If that isn't scary, I don't know what is.

  16. Re:I still don't get it by R2.0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Your statement has the same weight as Irwin Fletcher saying "Its all ball bearings these days."

    Throttle by wire - a couple of companies
    Brake by wire - none
    Steering by wire - none

    Why? If the first one fails, the engine dies. If the second 2 fail, you die. Some carmakers are experimenting with it, but none have brought to production.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  17. Ancient .sig by superid · · Score: 4, Funny
    I remember someones very old (probably a Wildcat BBS) sig that went something like:

    Anxiety \Anx*i"e*ty\ - n ; finding yourself behind a pinto and in front of an Audi 5000

  18. DaimlerChrysler did this to AutoWeek by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I seem to remember reading an AutoWeek article about 2 years ago about the time that DaimlerChrysler's Jeep divison introduced the Jeep Liberty small SUV.

    I opened my mail, and I saw this full page cover photo on this weekly auto magazine showing a Jeep Liberty tipping over during a slalom test. An inset picture showed the friggin' car flipped over on its side, if I remember correctly. I'm posting from work, so read for yourself:

    http://www.autoweek.com/article.cms?articleId=3331

    Turns out, AutoWeek testers were doing their standard lane change avoidance/slalom test that they do with everything from Hyundais to GMC Yukons. I'm pretty sure it was a production Jeep Liberty -- nothing pre-production -- that flipped over twice (???) and landed on its side during this relatively commonplace automotive review test.

    The driver, thankfully, only suffered a sore neck (nearly broke it, if it had rolled one more time), and AutoWeek devoted their entire issue to this vehicle which had been designed to put an affordable small SUV Jeep into the hands of consumers.

    DaimlerChrysler balked and basically claimed that THE TEST WAS NOT A REAL WORLD TEST. AutoWeek called bullshit and basically said, "Uh, yeah it is -- if a driver has to make a quick lane change and or dodge something in the road, it's as real world as it gets."

    http://www.autoweek.com/article.cms?articleId=4163

    I seem to remember that DaimlerChrysler continued to balk at the test, but in fact they ended up making center of gravity changes to the vehicle (suspension and ride height, perhaps?) over the course of the next model year.

    Sounds like the same crap that Renault is doing here.

    It's funny -- the automotive press gets touted all the time when they LOVE a car and try and hype up the manufacturers' products, but heaven forbid that they also try and save the manufacturer a little legal trouble by finding out these sorts of dangerous rollover issues and what not in pre-production cars. Only the GOOD NEWS, right? Bullshit.

    IronChefMorimoto

  19. Maybe it's an Easter Egg by cryptochrome · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet the cruise control has a hidden program to accelerate constantly when Sammy Hagar's "I Can't Drive 55" comes on over the speakers.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

  20. I call BS on Renault by Morgahastu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What is there to find? If there was a bug in some of the software on the car computers how would they find it since it's probably in every other Renault?

    "This car is exactly like all the other ones - no anomolies, nothing broken - it's fine."

    Chances are the computer would have auto reset like most do and any chance of software evidence being left is gone.

    This is why cars should have black boxes.

  21. Re:I still don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    WTF, even if the brake pedal (hello, aren't we still on hydraulic brakes???) wouldn't stop the car, couldn't he have shifted it into neutral?

    I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't let you do that

  22. Something similar happened to me... by hoggoth · · Score: 5, Funny

    Something similar happened to me but with my computer instead of with my car. I was attempting to use my computer in a responsible manner when all of a sudden it decided to download porn incessantly. In my panic I didn't think of pulling the power cord, and I had to download porn for many hours.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  23. Sequential control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That model probably hasn't the usual lever but two buttons on the steering wheel, and, you guessed it, the gearbox is electrically actuated with an electronic control.
    BTW, the hand brake is also electrically actuated. I know it because on a Renault Scenic I got stuck in the rush hour because the main fuse blew. Of course the manual override is in the boot, and the boot has no mechanical way to open it, only elecrical, so it was impossible to open.
    BTW2 the speed control has at least a bug: while the nominal increment is 2Km/h (i.e. you can preset 30, 32, 34 and so on) under some circumstances (i.e. not always) it wouldn't let you set the speed at 50Km/h: it's either 48 or 52.
    Due to these facts I tend to believe the guy more than Renault.

  24. Re:Computer? by raitchison · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yeah I'm not ready to call this guy a liar yet either.

    Car's are increasingly drive by wire nowadays. My 2004 Mazda3 has 100% electronic throttle control, there is no mechanical link between the gas pedal and the throttle body. Also my power steering fails if the engine isn't running, even if the engine is still turning (i.e. coasing down a long hill in gear with the ignition off).

    Some new luxury cars will start and drive with the ignition key only in the proximity of the ignition, this Renault may have that feature as well. Throw in an electrnically controlled clutchless transmission, wither it be SMG, CVT or electronic auto and I'm willing to entertain that his car could have had the Renault equivalent of a BSOD and sent the throttle to 100% to stay.

    Now if there really isn't signs of significant wear on the brakes that certianly discredits his story. Hitting the brakes hard at 120 would definitely do some damage to the pads/rotors. Or maybe he just didn't have the balls to stomp on the brakes when they weren't working as well as he wanted.

  25. Re:I still don't get it by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 3, Informative

    Throttle by wire - a couple of companies

    Just to give an example, it may be more than just "a couple of companies".

    I drive a compact VW with a 1-liter, 16-valve engine, and it is "throttle by wire". That's an economy car, mind you.

    I had if fail on me a few times when new, the dealer would never figure out the problem, they would see some strange conditions logged on the CPU, hard-reset the whole thing and it would not happen for a few days.

    After the third visit to the shop they finally replaced the whole control unit and I never had another problem with that car since (had it for 2.5 years not)

  26. Re:I still don't get it by The+Snowman · · Score: 4, Informative

    ABS is essentially brake-by-wire. If the black box decides it doesn't want pressure at the slave cylinders, the driver is just along for the ride.

    I do not know about other ABS systems, but in my vehicles if the ABS fails the power brakes still work. I had my ABS malfunction in one vehicle and the brakes worked like normal. In my experience, ABS modules are very fail-safe and I have never heard of one taking the driver along for the ride. Maybe you have, I am not saying you are wrong, just that I have not heard of that before.

    --
    24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
  27. Re:Mod yourself down... by racer19 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Try taking a look underneath a Z4 sometime. "Electric power steering" refers only to the system that is providing the BOOST to the steering effort. The actual connection between the steering wheel and the tie rods that turn the wheels is EXACTLY THE SAME as any other mechanical steering system...either a recirculating ball or rack-n-pinion system.

    The ONLY difference here is that the boost is provided electrically rather than hydraulically. Your example is "steering boost by wire", NOT "steer by wire".

    --
    Could someone please point out to me where in the Constitution, exactly, is the "Right To Not Be Offended"?
  28. Re:I still don't get it by Issue9mm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That might have been unexpected, but it's seldom lethal. Your car will drive just fine without any power steering fluid (assuming you don't burn out the pump and innards of course), as that is how all cars used to be.

    If you'd accelerated a little bit, you'd have noticed it got easier to turn, as the tires have less constant contact with the ground.

    Basically, the point I'm making is that if power steering fails, it's a little harder to turn. If steering-by-wire fails, the car DOES NOT turn at all, and you die. Granted, I'm sure that there would be some sort of failover in place before it was ever actually implemented, but that's the difference.

    Having to put some muscle into it is a whole lot better than the wheel spinning freely with no effect.

    -9mm-

  29. Re:I still don't get it by Alioth · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, it's not the sudden opening of the throttle that would result in unburned fuel.

    In the old school carb, if the throttle (a simple metal plate) opens wide rapidly, it will result in greatly increased airflow without much of an increase in fuel flow - and the engine will tend to 'lean cut' - not enough fuel and far too much air for combustion.

    The solution to that was to add accelerator pumps to the carb. When the driver boots the throttle, the mechanical linkage also activates one or more accelerator pumps which squirt a bunch of additional fuel into the mix. Naturally, this isn't metered particularly accurately, but it'll ensure that the mixture is more or less right (probably well on the rich side) so the engine doesn't lean cut.

    Modern electronic fuel injection is a completely different kettle of fish. Cars without pure throttle by wire will still meet requirements because the EFI system won't just dump a bunch of raw fuel into the incoming air like the accelerator pump, it'll be metered. In many cars, the linkage to the throttle butterfly is still just a cable - but pure throttle by wire (where the only connection between your right foot and the throttle body) is better still as when the engine control computer (known as a FADEC - Full Authority Digital Engine Control - in aviation) has control over the entire process instead of reacting to the throttle butterfly suddenly going wide open.

  30. Renault test doesn't prove much by bobalu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A) They could have a bug that only comes out under particular cirumstances that weren't reached in the test.

    We all know that.

    B) It can take a long time to smoke out weird car problems. I had a problem with my steering lock engaging that wasn't correctly diagnosed for like two years because it was a very specific set of actions that caused it to happen. It eventually caused an accident; fortunately it just put me into a guard rail when I was making a turn. They didn't believe me until one of the mechanics was buzzing around the shop and it almost put him into the wall.

    THEN they believed me.

    --
    The revolution will NOT be televised.
  31. I've experienced it, repeatedly but not repeatably by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've had my cruise control accelerate beyond its setting several times. Even had the logic module replaced twice to no effect.

    I'll have braked to slow down for other traffic, then passed that traffic, and hit Resume. The car accelerates to the previously set cruising speed as normal, but then suddenly decides it has to go floor it to reach another, higher speed.

    Tapping the brake pedal once has always disengaged it, and the one time when I had enough clear straight road to allow it to run (the technician that worked on it wanted the data), it would go up to 95 MPH, slow to 90, then back to 95, repeating. Probably a limitation in the vehicle that prevents it from going faster.

    Unfortunately I have been unable to reproduce the behavior on demand, and I always wonder if it is going to go crazy again the next time I hit the Resume button. I'm thinking it must be some combination of the cruise controls used to adjust the cruising speed pressed long before the triggering event that primes the event.

    The only way I'd accept a black box in my car would be to diagnose this problem and get it fixed, and then I'd have the black box removed.

    Mine is a Honda Civic with aftermarket cruise control (not a standard option).

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  32. Re:There's a simple fix for that by hoggoth · · Score: 3, Funny

    >> attempting to use my computer in a responsible manner when all of a sudden it decided to download porn
    > To avoid that, never use Outlook, Outlook Express, or Internet Explorer.

    Actually, several programs went crazy all at once: BitTorrent, Kazaa, eDonkey, GNUtella, even FTP! It was very scary that all of those applications could take over my computer for hours and hours the way they did. Even scarier was the way I was forced to sit and watch them the entire time.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)