Slashdot Mirror


Indymedia Server Raided by FBI

jaromil writes "Today at about 18:00 CET FBI raided the indymedia servers hosted by Rackspace both in US and England. At present, the italian indymedia and numerous other local IMC websites are obscured, while the reasons why the hard drives were taken are still unknown."

20 of 1,150 comments (clear)

  1. Gag? by More+Trouble · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "(14:20) Rackspace has issued a "no comment" response concerning the FBI's actions."


    Given that Rackspace seemed reasonably communicative about the Swiss Secret Service issue, I wonder if the "no comment" implies some invocation of the Patriot Act.

    :w

  2. what about diebold? by jaromil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My supposition is the following:

    Diebold threatened the italian indymedia website, along with other
    IMC hosted there, one year ago, for hosting documents discussing
    the numerous scandals about their voting system.

    This case was taken up by the EFF and they WON in court.

    Now, just before the elections in USA, Diebold is coming back
    under cover to strike back.
    Of course they will never declare Diebold is behind all this.
    Then who would be next, slashdot? just search "Diebold" in the archives if you
    don't remember well wassup...

    of course, just my 2 cents

  3. at what stage does identification become scary? by Dr.Knackerator · · Score: 5, Interesting

    i mean if they published names is that really wrong? its a public event, its on telly so by default you could be recognised in the audience, by going you agree your privacy is compromised in some way, your details will probably go onto some list of people to call back.

    if you stood outside the entrance, took photos of the people going in and published them, would that be the same thing? if its a public place whats the problem?

    has there been intimidation? or is this just fear because its the republicans in power?

    there are plenty if privacy concerns just by being a voter, your details are available to be seen locally (speaking as a UK citizen myself). and if you don't tick the right box then hell its available to anybody who wants it, anywhere, possibly for cross referencing with the phone book so burglars can find your phone number if if looks like you are out. well having a pretty rare name and being involved in something where a lot of people know i've got a load of expensive gear - i don't register to vote. I know people who have been repeatedly hit and vanloads of equipment nicked.

    as another point, really is there any need to go? its on the telly. like all political conferances its just preaching to the converted and you are just there to applaud on cue to make the pictures look good.

  4. Re:Freedom of Speech, Freedom of the Press! by erick99 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This will surely get me modded down....but....I have been doing a informal count of posts that are pro or against Bush. So far I am showing about six to one, against Bush versus pro-Bush. I don't know if that means the Slashdot crowd is overwhelmingly democrat and/or liberal, or, the pro-Bush side is unusually quiet?

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
  5. Re:Freedom of speech is a noble thing by radish · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The best theories are so far that they either (a) posted photos of undercover swiss police officers or (b) posted publicly available info concerning members of the RNC.

    If (a), what on earth does this have to do with terrorism or indeed the FBI. If (b), this is public info, they just collated it. Again, what does this have to do with the FBI, or indeed terrorists.

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  6. some background by GirTheRobot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Earlier last month, the Secret Service requested visitor logs from Indymedia to determine who posted personal info about GOP delegates. It looks like Big Brother really wanted that info.

    See link for more info.

  7. Re:Freedom of Speech, Freedom of the Press! by elgaard · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One explanation is that not everyone here live in the US. Outside the US Bush is not popular, left or right.

  8. Decentralize the Servers by BlastM · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It is a sad reality that government organisations use bully tactics for political purposes. If I were running, say, an independent media company, I wouldn't be running my website, the main distribution method off a rack server with 19 other countries' IMCs.

    In fact, this is what Freenet is designed for.

    Decentralise and conquer!

    IMCs are like the guerillas of news media. They should start (contuinue) using this to their advantage.

  9. How will this affect US based companies? by jrumney · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This should serve as a warning to all people and companies outside the US. If you do business with US companies, you will be held to US laws, without the protection of the US consitution, since that only applies to Americans on American soil.

    The sooner OPEC switches to the Euro and isolation of the US world bully begins, the better IMHO.

  10. Re:Freedom of Speech, Freedom of the Press! by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    RNC delegates "accosted" in NYC? There's nothing special there - haven't you ever been to NYC? What did these stuffed shirt Red Staters expect, showing up in the toughest Democrat constituency in America with dazzled stares? That we'd leave them alone, out of politeness, and gratitude for their paltry cheapskate tourism, that scared away the usual crowd of spenders?

    And these "reports" of campaign HQ shootings: let's see some citations. You're not talking about the one attended by the serial baby-crying sign dropper, Republican agent provocateur, are you? If you really believe this crap, you better change the channel from Fox News, maybe go outside and talk to some humans. Maybe someone would explain you that "Communist blacklisting" was the rightwing authorities secretly locking out unpopular workers from legitimate jobs. Today, it's known as "no fly lists" and "terrorist watch lists", and "Florida voter purge lists" - all created by Republican authorities to suppress the fair representation of Democrats and other opposition to their fascism. That doesn't make their opponents communists.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  11. Right to bear resemblence to arms. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yeah, the Rev. Moon's Washington Times would never investigate those reports to see if they're just another Rove frame job:

    In the 1996 Alabama Supreme Court race between Democratic incumbent Kenneth Ingram and Republican challenger Harold See, Rove printed anonymous fliers attacking See, his own client. The purpose was "'to create a backlash against the Democrat,' as Joe Perkins, who worked for Ingram, put it to me," Green writes.

    I find it totally predictable that a Bush apologist would get behind this Republican terrorism. Have you taken all the shots you can?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  12. subversion by electricdream · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Whether this is in regards to Swiss Undercover Agent, or the Posting of RNC delegates information you may rest absolutely assured that had any of the Big 5 derivatives ( you know viacom, time-warner, murdoch , disney and that german company ) done the same thing their assets would have been seized as well.

    One only has to look at the sesuire of CNN's equipement after Robert Novack revealed that Valerie Plame was an undercover CIA agent to conclude that indymedia is being treated equally.

    Oh hold on... that never happend! Oh well So much for Freedom of Press!

    That any media organization whatever would have it's harddrives, presses, or any other method of publication seized without explaination or public discourse is an afront to a free society and should be seen as a crime against the people.

    Bush 1895!

    --
    -- force and mind are opposites; morality ends where a gun begins ayn rand
  13. Re:all depends on your perspective by Jerf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You Righties see America as something to which you owe loyalty, and you see and the President, Senators, et al as demigods.

    That is complete, utter, biased, trolling, ideologist bullshit, and so is your +5, Insightful.

    Instead of generalizing, why don't you get to know some real, non-radical right-leaning people? (Of course, I can judge the left based on the radicals but that wouldn't be fair either, no?) You'll find they are people, just like you. Most of the time, they even have the same concerns. They just differ on priority levels and solutions.

    Oh, how convenient it is for you to dismiss "the right" as, apparently literally, animals. You are much, much more part of the problem than the solution.

  14. Re:Freedom of Speech, Freedom of the Press! by Andux · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The definition of libertarian is one who is for minimal government intrusion in both personal and economic life.
    Not exactly. Capital-L Libertarians hold those beliefs, true, but small-L libertarians (AKA civil libertarians or social liberals) are much more varied when it comes to economic policy.
    A person for minimal government intrusion in economic life and more intruusion in personal life is a conservative.
    Eh, "conservative" has so many definitions piled on it that it's essentially meaningless by itself. Social conservatives (e.g., Jerry Falwell) are the ones who want to legislate morality. Paleoconservatives (e.g., John McCain), on the other hand, are essentially moderate (capital-L) Libertarians, idealizing smaller government.
    --
    (Do not sign anything.) -- Fell, Planescape: Torment
  15. Re:Freedom of Speech, Freedom of the Press! by TomRitchford · · Score: 4, Interesting

    > Further, I can tell you that the vast majority of protestors were not city residents.

    I live in New York City and that's the most ridiculous crap I've ever read. Many of my friend were arrested. Dozens if not hundreds of people I know were there. Dozens of New York City organizations representing thousands of people were there.

    One of my friends were held (for well over 24 hours) with a family of French tourists who had made the terrible mistake of stepping out of their hotel while the police were rounding them up.

    They were, apparently, very upset because they didn't speak English well and of course the police would not tell them what they were charged with -- or attempt to communicate with them in any way!

    For some reason people think that the Republican National Convention somehow trumps the Constitution. I personally don't get it.

  16. important enough to fire up your mail client by ndpatel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    hey, i'm not going to take a side, except to say that it'd be awesome if we knew what was going on here. a prominent critic of a sitting president has been silenced, setting a bad precedent. furthermore, they did not charge the critic, but subpeona'd the ISP. that's not good.

    so, let's force the people with access to start asking questions.
    nytimes
    newsweek
    o'reilly
    msnbc


    plus you can go to various other websites and fill out their forms--CNN, for example.
    again, no sides taken, but let's try and cause a stink--this is a big deal. I'll even make it easy for you--copy'n'paste!

    The FBI has effectively shut down Indymedia.org (IMC) by issuing an order to RackSpace US to hand over server hard drives located in London. As a result, over 20 local Indymedia sites have been shut off. At this time, no one knows why the FBI wants the drives or what they are investigating. It is also unclear why Rackspace US complied with a demand for materials held by Rackspace UK. Indymedia is a vocal critic of the Bush Administration, and also of the mass media. There is some history of this administration's dislike of Indymedia: before the RNC, there was a Secret Service order to shut down nyc.indymedia.org, which was organizing protests. More information can be found at the general Indymedia site, http://www.indymedia.org.

    --
    london is drowning and i live by river
  17. Cointelpro, Patriot Act style. by Darth23 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Sometimes the simplest explanation are the most accurate IMO, This is purely a case of political repression.

    The federal government has a LONG and storied history of illegal attempts to thwart political dissent. cointelprois only one of the most famous examples. The wars agaisnt political dissent continued through the 1990's and continues to this day.

    To go from a few random acts of violence to soem conclusion that this justifies seizing IndyMedia's servers is more than a stretch. But luckily, under the Patriot Act, the feds don't actually have to go before a judge or produce any evidence or anything icky like that.


    This entire country has recently been through a massive disinformation campaign (WMD's anyone?), most people should be more suspicious of an action of this kind, especially so close to national elections.


    I'd wager that in a few months the Indymedia 'investigation' will quietly end with no charges being filed and no explainations given.


    Unfortunately for whoever is coordinating this latest governmenteffort, dissent and public disbelief in Official Government Lies has pread far beyond the underground radical fringe. Heck, you can buy Fahrenheit 9/11 at WALMART... where they sell guns and everything.


    If the Indymedia people are worth their salt as activists, they'll be able to parlay this government action into increased visibility and increased participation in their efforts.

    --

    -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

  18. Re:Freedom of Speech, Freedom of the Press! by Qrlx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You don't know who shot up Republican campaign offices, and you don't know who burned swastikas in the yard.

    Unless, of course, you were in on it ;)

    Stop being such a Cassandra.

  19. Bush by Analogue+Kid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Lots of people like Bush here in Taiwan. That's because he's publicly stated that he'll honor the US commitment to defend Taiwan if China attacks. After France made some weapon deals with China, China set up over 500 missles pointed RIGHT F*#&ING AT THIS CITY(), and China and France started doing joint military drills, Bush sent 7 aircraft carriers into the Taiwan straight as a deterent. Kerry, meanwhile has repeatedly promised China more cooperation on all issues and barely mentioned Taiwan at all. Taiwan is THE issue China has with everyone...

    I don't know much about what's going on with Iraq, but if Kerry wins theres a good chance of having war here... China won't happily tolerate Chen Shui Bian () much longer. Mainland Chinese been threatening to attack for years, and if the US abandons, they will.

    --
    I'm a gnu world man.
  20. Pre-screening crowds for campaigns by gosand · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Given the demonstrated electioneering competency of the Democrats and Republicans in recent years, I would say that the above is actually the most likely explanation.

    I just heard a report on NPR this morning. A reporter went to a Bush appearance wearing a Kerry T-shirt. He was told by the secret service he would be arrested if he didn't leave. He went to a Kerry appearance wearing a Bush T-shirt. Nothing happened.

    I thought - big whoop. They then went on to interview and describe many others who had been removed with the threat of JAIL from Bush appearances because they were "questionable". One woman had a small Kerry pin on her jacket. One guy had come from a Kerry rally and had a Kerry T-shirt on, which he had covered up with a long-sleeve shirt. At one high-school, several students were removed in tears by secret service officers for having Kerry items on. The list went on and on. One guy complied, and took off his Kerry item, and was still ordered to leave. Some people were put in jail for 2 hours, then charges dropped. The local police said they were following the orders of the secret service, and the secret service said they were following the orders of the white house.

    So now you aren't allowed at a Bush event unless you support him? I guess it is all about the image of having support. It must be pretty easy to have a chanting mob of supporters if you pre-screen the crowd. It sounds kind of like a tent revival for an evangelical con-man.

    I didn't see the report on NPRs website yet, so I can't link to it. But I did just hear it this morning on the way into work.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.