Slashdot Mirror


XPrize Founders Launch Tech Innovation Competition

metlin writes "The organizers of the Ansari X-Prize have launched the equivalent of the X-Prize in a variety of technology areas, called the WTN X-Prizes. The idea is to have a series of prizes for important technology challenges facing humanity in the 21st century, which will be judged by the World Technology Network. The website mentions that, 'The concept of the WTN X PRIZES is to utilize the concepts, procedures, technologies and publicity developed X PRIZE Foundation's Ansari X PRIZE competition for space and the global science and technology innovators identification process and community developed by the World Technology Network (WTN) to launch a series of technology prizes seeking to meet the greatest challenges facing humanity in the 21st century.' Sounds like a good idea, maybe this will help make that flying car a reality?"

24 of 214 comments (clear)

  1. Re:crappy article by Sqwubbsy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, if you follow the link, there's a space where you can suggest what the prizes should be for.

  2. Re:crappy article by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Informative
    From the "Click for more information" link:

    Here is a very rough and incomplete list of the sorts of challenges that might be appropriate:

    • Medical challenges, such a cure for cancer or other major diseases.
    • Technological "holy grails", such as artificial intelligence, teleportation, molecular assemblers (true nanotechnology), cold fusion, or a believable virtual reality system
    • Major global challenges, such as the various UN Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) announced by the world's leaders at the UN in 2000 at the Millennium Summit.
  3. Idea for important technological innovation by Denver_G · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can they make one of the 1st prizes some of the X-ray specs so I can see through womens clothing! (Yes, it must have a gender filter)

  4. Cool by ender1598 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Instead of fusion power constantly being 10 years in the future, it'll now be stuck at 5!

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world; those that understand binary and those that do not.
  5. Important technology challenges by Advocadus+Diaboli · · Score: 5, Funny

    like e.g. making Microsoft Windows secure? :-)

    SCNR

    1. Re:Important technology challenges by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 5, Insightful

      it's as simple as unplugging the ethernet cable and using a Linux or OS X box to surf.

      --
      Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
      Africus aut Europaeus?
  6. Zooming out by n54 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm getting a bit worried that the X-Prize people have lost focus. Better to do one thing right at the time as they have with the Ansari X-Prize.

    --
    this comment is provided "as is" and without any express or implied legibility or congruity [...]
    1. Re:Zooming out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Considering that the X-Prize was one at a loss of 2-3 times the winnings...

      No it wasn't.

      Allen will make back MORE than his original investment with the prize money plus the Virgin Galactic deal, PLUS there are other groups queueing up to license the tech. It's starting to look like a pretty smart investment.

  7. Whats the deal with flying cars? by ActionJesus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously... why is having flying cars lauded as "the next big thing" all the time? There are several things that would make travel easier and cheaper, such as electric or hydrogen powered cars. Or, even at the less techinical side of things, an effective public transport system. Also nicer to the environment.

    Also, think of the mess you get when theres a car crash on a motorway. Now multiply that by 40 times - thats the mess you get when flying cards run out of fuel and plough into regular traffic.

    Instead of worrying about flying cars, lets just try and make the cars we DO have less of a hassle.

    1. Re:Whats the deal with flying cars? by tom17 · · Score: 3, Funny
      cant see one of these doing much damage in a crash....

      Flying card

  8. Do we really need prizes for this stuff? by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are we afraid the guy who invents the usable flying car won't be able to sell any? Is there someone with an AI sitting around saying, "If only I could figure out how to make some cash off this?"

    The prize for the space travel thing was incentive to do it cheaply, wasn't it? That doesn't work when the hard part is doing it at all.

    That said, it's still pretty cool.

    1. Re:Do we really need prizes for this stuff? by squaretorus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Theres one thing to have an idea, to have the motivation, to have the ingenuity and the focus. It's quite another to have the money and time to actually DO anything about it.

      Finding a funder can be a bitch - prizes like this mean that the funder has a second bet on - firstly they are betting the flying car will make money - second they are betting that the prize itself will give them some additional publicity.

      Imagine HP spending a few million on an Xprize entry for... well... anything. Thats a fraction of an advertising budget. They will sink the money more quickly based on a prize timescale and the reduced 'risk'.

      At least I _think_ thats the theory of this kind of prize.

  9. Prize for Fuel Cells? by antivoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I feel someone should offer a nice prize for creating an efficient and clean way of producing hydrogen for fuel cell technology. Fuel cells already exist, but the cost, pollution and work involved in producing the hyrdogen required to run a fuel cell is prohibitive. If cheap and clean hydrogen production was achieved, we would be able to stop burning fossil fuels, the world would be a cleaner place, and stuff like flying cars could very well become a reality due to the sheer amount of power fuel cells can produce.

  10. Flying car? by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd hope they come up with real 21st century ideas, rather than rehashing old 20th century ones. Besides, what's the point of being able to fly to work when you still can't find anywhere to park? Anyway, the real problem isn't making a cheap flying machine as much as making it safe for the average person to control it - so what they'd really need are AI pilots, rather than flying cars.

  11. A bit off-topic but... by DeepDarkSky · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Flying cars sound really great, but quite frankly, I think it's a waste. Unless it offers considerable advantage, it would never take-off (pun intended). By considerable advantage, I mean it can get to places a lot faster or uses less fuel or something. I can see the use of them, but not on a large scale basis. Flying cars will obviously use consierably more fuel than regular cars and other ground transports. For other purposes, there's the airplane, which has been economized and travels much faster.

    The flying car, then, I think will end up being like helicopters - but perhaps slightly more common. Wealthy people will have them and for emergency purposes (organ transplants, etc.), but other than that, I don't see flying cars as truly useful. In the U.S., we already consume so much energy driving, etc., do we really just need more ways to consumer energy faster?

    (Granted, if we all had this attitude, we would have had the technology advances we've had up to know, airplanes and all, but current energy usage trends are quite alarming).

  12. Innovations are nice, but . . . by Gabrill · · Score: 4, Insightful
    We already have lots of innovation in raw technology. The problem is that they're not economically feasable. The next prizes should be given to the company (or individual) who brings a next generation technology to the masses.

    A true highway autopilot in a sub $30k car

    Safe fog and rain navigation for the same car

    Economic and RELIABLE robotic assembly lines

    Stuff like that.

    --
    Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
  13. what I want to know is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The concept of the WTN X PRIZES is to utilize the concepts, procedures, technologies and publicity developed X PRIZE Foundation's Ansari X PRIZE competition for space and the global science and technology innovators identification process and community developed by the World Technology Network (WTN) to launch a series of technology prizes seeking to meet the greatest challenges facing humanity in the 21st century.

    What will the prize be for a foolproof way of teaching writing skills?

  14. Where's the opposite prize? by thrill12 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Wherever a prize was awarded, anti-prizes where tought of: the golden raspberry(anti-Oscar), ig-nobel prize('anti'-NobelPrize), etc.

    Where is this "Anti X-prize" then ?
    My personal idea for the contents for such a prize would be:

    Prize for the craft that crashes most spectacular (without people, duh)

    Prize for the most useless invention on (name your territory here)

    Prize for the worst overshoot of a set target (wanted to the moon, went to Mars)
    Any more ?

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  15. Re:crappy article by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Funny
    'The concept of the WTN X PRIZES is to utilize the concepts, procedures, technologies and publicity developed X PRIZE Foundation's Ansari X PRIZE competition for space and the global science and technology innovators identification process and community developed by the World Technology Network (WTN) to launch a series of technology prizes seeking to meet the greatest challenges facing humanity in the 21st century.'

    A prize for software that takes overly long and unweildy sentances, and converts them to plain English.

  16. Alternative Energy Sources by BlueMonk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think the biggest challenge facing humanity right now is energy. I don't know if everyone realizes how many of the world's problems are based on energy consumption and how much better off we would be with some alternative energy source that is safe, clean, cheap and plentiful. Surely we've put our minds to it before, and maybe it's futile to hope for such a miracle, but maybe it's time to try again. Any hope of finally getting that cold fusion to work? :) Or maybe some combination of high yield solar panels with efficient storage cells.

    Imagine -- forget mideast oil and all their conflicts; forget pollution -- most of it comes from our current, primary energy sources; forget nuclear waste disposal (after we're done with what we've already got to deal with); and if the energy source is reasonably self-contained / localized (like solar panels on the house), forget transmission problems and dangers. If I had to pay double taxes for 2 years to get this worked out, I'd be all for it!

    1. Re:Alternative Energy Sources by n54 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree, even starvation (which another poster mentioned) can often (in part) be attributed to lack of energy, for example local overuse of wood contributing to drought or desertification.

      Still, research into energy sources probably wont get much help from prizes given out afterwards: either they're already funded by governments or (usually oil) companies, or they lack enough present funding like this interesting fusion project: http://www.focusfusion.org/home.html - disregard the horrible site design, and if there's a VC out there why not have a closer look? If it's successful you'll make Paul Allen green with envy ;)

      Such projects or other more established ones might benefit a lot more from "fasttracking" than a prize by getting more funds and brainpower. Then again with all the research going on it might not help at all: do we want to try a broad approach or hedge our bets on a few? Choosing is very hard. Most governments in America, Europe, Asia and Oceania are giving pretty big incentives for energy research as it is. Some big examples are the US hydrogen focus, Chinas pebble reactors (the South African Republic is also looking at this, so Africa is in too), and the Australian solar tower (european technology), and there are lots and lots of smaller projects almost everywhere.

      --
      this comment is provided "as is" and without any express or implied legibility or congruity [...]
  17. solar power by bob_avernus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Solar panels are still pretty expensive, so why not have a prize for an efficient process for making solar panels?

  18. Advances? by builderbob_nz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    maybe this will help make that flying car a reality?

    Oh God I hope not. It is bad enough now with drivers not watching what they are doing in two dimensions and now you want to add a third!? The day that they let the average Joe Blogs drive a flying car is the day I give up driving and to back to walking/cycling/public transport - I'll live longer!

    --

    Karma? Hey I just call it as I see it.
  19. Kevin Rice's list of tech innovations needed by justanyone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been thinking about this for a long time.
    Here's my list:

    1. Medical technique (drug/etc.) to stimulate regrowth of tissue, as various lizards do. Lose an arm? Regrow it. this would have to take into account the replacement of scar tissue with healthy new tissue. Important in this are skin, nerve, and heart tissues.
    2. Replacement teeth. Along the same lines as tissue regrowth for the gums, replacement teeth would have similar properties to existing teeth but be permanently implanted. We have this for hips, knees, etc., why not for teeth?
    3. Technique to artificially stimulate (nuclear) Beta decay. This would allow us to reduce radioactivity immediately in radioactive materials.
    4. Method/device to increase, decrease (even to become negative) the force of gravity acting on an object. This would NOT include any mechanical device; I'm talking about a gravitational FIELD force here.
    5. 3 dimensional display as a transparent globe that we look into to view projected images. This would allow 3-D viewing, and would vastly assist all manner of medical and engineering processes.
    6. Caller-id. Oh, sorry, we have that.
    7. Recognition in the social sciences realm that peace studies deserves more research and development, allowing disparate, traditionally hateful relationships between ethic/religious/etc. groups morph into peaceful coexistence, without resorting to genocide of one or the other groups.
    8. Airborne refuelling using liquid oxygen instead of jet fuel.
    9. Ramjet or scramjet jet engines that can go from 100% atmospheric oxygen variably to 100% onboard oxygen, burning kerosene.
    10. Same suppemental oxygen engines that are rated for very high mach numbers in rarified air.
    11. Space suits that are very thin and easy to put on/take off, and work at higher than 2 psi so there's no prebreathing requirement.
    12. Very high specific impulse (ISP) engines (from 1000 to 10,000) with thrust ranges in the tens or hundreds of newtons instead of millinewtons.

    Just a smattering of goals here.