Slashdot Mirror


Microbatteries Built on a Bed of Nails

nadamsieee writes "The good folks at IEEE Spectrum have a news brief about a newly invented method of creating microbatteries using an electrode that looks like a bed of nails. The method was created by a team led by Prof. Marc Madou of UC Irvine. IEEE Spectrum notes that 'according to the researchers, a battery using such an electrode can generate 78 percent more power than a stacked-plate microbattery of the same volume.'"

18 of 75 comments (clear)

  1. I don't believe them... by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...they're a bunch of fakirs.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  2. Let me guess... by suckass · · Score: 2, Funny

    5 years till this is on the market.

    --
    blah, blah, blah
  3. This is the same tech in all modern batteries. by rebeka+thomas · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is the same tech in all modern batteries. Increase surface area and you get more reaction. No different to heatsinks, it's been known for years.

    Nothing to see here, Move along.

    --
    RST
    1. Re:This is the same tech in all modern batteries. by sindas · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Nothing to see here, Move along.
      Nothing to see here? We understand the science behind the idea, but until now no one has made this tech. (at least not in this way)... Whats with the current trend of /.ers that are spewing randomly that every piece of news here sucks? maybe its just the people here that are so critical of the news that suck? why dont you submit some better news if this isnt good enough?
    2. Re:This is the same tech in all modern batteries. by robslimo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      True, but this is an example of using the latest (of what may hopefully become mainstream) manufacturing technology to take the concept of 'maximizing the surface area' to the next level, increasing the storage density and reaction area proportionally.

      However, I suspect that traditional issues such as buildup of non-reactive material will affect this tech just as badly or worse than the existing technology. Time will tell.

  4. High output, but is it rechargeable? by goneutt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This looks like a high tech version of the ancient carbon cell battery. I would hope that this design can be made rechargeable, I wouldn't want to replace a battery made with a super expensive nanotube component, EVER. And no, I'm not thinking MP3 player, I'm thinking sensors that you don't want to have to visit regulary.

    --
    Bacardi + slashdot = negative karma.
  5. That's nifty... by fejes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But does it scale?

    At what point does this all fail? This might be great if you want to power an ant sized object, but what are the odds we'll see it in anything greater than the size of a pacemaker.

    And, of course, if the process is similar to a chip, can we expect to buy it in units of 1000 for $300 each?

    --
    The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
  6. 360 KA / M^3 - WOW! by 6800 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That sounds impressive, how impressive is it? Can it be made rechargable? Can it be stacked to be a full cubic meter's worth? How many Kilo amphours would such a battery yield? I guess it is too early to tell these things.

    1. Re:360 KA / M^3 - WOW! by Green+Salad · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Can it be made rechargable? I'd think the basic concept of increasing the surface area should work with rechargable formulations as well. The challenge is in the engineering to turn that concept into a reality. Some materials are easier to manipulate that others.

  7. Interesting, but by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd sell a body part to be able to get a "battery" that was somwhere between a capacitor and battery in features. Supercapacitors are getting closer, but even 10F is no where near a small battery in capacity.

    I'm working on a hybrid vehicle, and finding a way to make good use of the regenerative braking power is a real challenge. Lead acids can only take a charge so fast, usually less than 0.1 of the power available during braking, unless you completely oversize the battery banks.

    I want something with a very low charge impedance that can basically lock the shaft of the motor/generator, if need be.. completely eliminating friction brakes.

    This would have bigger applications... Imagine charging your laptop in 10 minutes, then running for 6 hours.

    So these advances in power density and discharge impedance are good, but tangential to what I think will be the real killer app, a super low charging impedance battery.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:Interesting, but by ImTwoSlick · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I want something with a very low charge impedance that can basically lock the shaft of the motor/generator, if need be.. completely eliminating friction brakes.

      What about using a frictionless flywheel? You can spin it up using the electricity acquired during braking, or use some kind of clutch to transfer power from the wheels to it. After it has been spun up, use it as an electric generator until you need to brake again.

    2. Re:Interesting, but by gone.fishing · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Electronics is all about compramise. You are trying to do something in one step that really requires a stage (or two) in between.

      Capture the energy in a large capacitor and then use some circuitry to charge the battery from the stored charge in the capacitor.

      It will cost you perhaps 10% in loss but that is acceptable compared to the alternitives.

      You may also want to think about moving away from lead-acid batteries, some of the newer elecric and hybrids are using large banks of Nickle Metal Hydryd batteries. Litterally banking hundreds of "D" cells into a large battery.

  8. OT :Interesting, but by The+FooMiester · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Have you looked at the idea of fuel cells? Email me and we can chat about other things relevant to this thread.

    --
    The previous has been a secret message to my comrades.
  9. Renewable naysayer energy by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Funny

    If only we had a way to harness the energy generated by the spontaneous knee-jerk naysaying of Slashdot posters, our energy needs would be met forever.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  10. No free lunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    You get amp-hours based on the quantity of reactants that you have. What these guys have created is a way to discharge a small battery more quickly.

    OK so sometimes you do need a battery with a low internal resistance. Trying to use this for something like a hearing aid wouldn't help very much. If you could make a smaller battery, then it wouldn't last as long.

  11. goes with the turf by zogger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think it's the nature of high IQ nerdom. You tend to think the "other guy" is an idiot, because a lot of times they are. Makes you pretty egocentric I guess, even when the other guy is SMARTER than you or has pulled off something impressive.. Hecktapay when you got a large room fulla them...in meat space or cyberspace... ....had a sales job once, selling a new and improved technical product. Doesn't matter what it was now, what I noticed though was when I was selling to joe blow, it was normal,questions answers, sold some, sometimes didn't, but it was a normal deal. When I tried to sell to engineers they argued constantly about it, said they could do it cheaper/better/faster and yada yada yada. It was an automatic reaction they had, just the way their minds worked. Didn't matter to them, it is hard coded DNA or something. I would ask them why they didn't do it then (zero of them had ever made anything like it), and why did they bother making an appointment, especially when they knew the ballpark figures up front. they would just sputter then, pretty funny. Serious PITA sometimes. Ya, it was bad salesmanship on my part, didn't care, I made enough sales and was raking in the dough at the time. It was argumentive debate sport for me with them guys, nerd to nerd...

    No, I don't like sales.. don't do it anymore....I did sell a few units to engineers, but I studiously avoided them after the first few times.

  12. This increases the power output... by Jason1729 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    but it has no effect on the total energy output, so it lets you build devices that drain batteries even faster. Just what we need.

    An NiMH cell can already handle a load of 2C quite easily. Do we really need more? If that's not enough power, it's time to move to a larger cell. What good is a PDA/Cellphone/Camera that only lasts for 15 minutes on a charge even if it is 10% smaller than the old model?

    Jason
    ProfQuotes

    1. Re:This increases the power output... by LakeSolon · · Score: 2, Informative

      As someone above already mentioned a perfect application for a higher power-density battery is hybrid/electric cars. The guys over at acpropulsion.com, while having recently switched to Lithium Ion batteries (some ridiculous number of cells) had a very swift car (oversized go-kart of a kit car) put together with, if I recall correctly, 22 lead acid batteries. The car could go 100 miles on the energy in those batteries but the reason they had 22 was not for the range, it was for the power output.

      Their motor system draws about 200kW (roughly 260 horsepower). Looking at the Optima Yellow Top (the specific battery model they were using, I believe) specifications we see the rated KW output of 9.0 per battery. 9*22=198KW.

      ~Lake