Slashdot Mirror


Backups to CD-R?

Lumpish Scholar asks: "Backups are important, so we should tell our friends and family to buy a bunch of CD-Rs and...what? The operating system most of them are stuck with comes with backup software, but 'Windows Backup Does Not Back Up to CD-R, CD-RW, or DVD-R Devices (this behavior is by design). I've looked in the obvious places, but nothing comes across as better than adequate. There's got to be something that can do full or incremental backups (which in part means keeping track of what's already been backed up), that can back up files bigger than a single CD-R, and that's relatively fast and easy. What have you used to solve this problem, for yourself or others, for Windows or for better operating systems?"

106 comments

  1. you know by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1, Interesting

    WHy the hell dosent windos allow backup to CDR? Any rational reason?

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:you know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Hmmm... perhaps because Microsoft gets enough flak as it is for bundling unthinkable applications like a web browser and media player?

    2. Re:you know by Nimey · · Score: 1, Interesting

      RTFA.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    3. Re:you know by cgenman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Probably because Windows XP's inherent burning system isn't as well hooked into the OS as HDD-based removable media. They just got the whole CD-as-floppy paradigm with XP, and it doesn't exactly work right yet. Go ahead, try to save this page to your CDR drive.

      Didn't work, did it? Explorer is doing all kinds of fancy footwork to make it appear as if you're copying files onto the drive, then burning them, when under the hood you're just copying to a local cache on drive C.

      Essentially, their CDR implementation is incomplete, and therefore it would be a pain to implement full backup to it. Add to that file splitting and management, and why not just hold off on that feature until Longhorn.

    4. Re:you know by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Microsoft got flak for including a web browser while at the same time threatening OEMs to pull out of lucrative contracts if they continued to install a competing browser, Netscape, that at the time more people wanted. If Microsoft had simply installed IE and let OEMs do as they please, IE might have won on merit alone. We won't know, though, because Microsoft jerked around OEMs and by extension most customers. That's hardly the way to get a lot of sympathy from free marketers or geeks who already question the ethics/lawfulness of Microsoft's past business decisions. It is a great way to get flak, though.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    5. Re:you know by jkirby · · Score: 1

      I suspect someone said the same thing about a Web Browser so MS created and gave away IE. Then they got sued, again and again and again...

      --
      Jamey Kirby
    6. Re:you know by mebob · · Score: 1

      What does the explorers burning ability have to do with the back up softwares's ability to use CD media just as it would a tape?

      CD burning in XP is crappy but this shouldn't be that hard to accomplish.

      --
      =1000101
    7. Re:you know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought this was off... integrate web browsing and multimedia into the operating system but not basic input/output to a very common storage device... WTF?

  2. For Linux/FreeBSD/etc. by Rikus · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I use cpio, tar, and/or pax to archive files into a big ball, then encrypt that ball and burn it to CD (suitable for storing in an untrusted location). tar has builtin date checking, to determine which files need to be backed up, but cpio and pax are much more flexible in that they take a list of files from stdin, so you can use a more advanced routine to determine which files have changed.

    I wrote a little shell script to wrap this all into a convenient command, and I'm sure many others have as well.

    1. Re:For Linux/FreeBSD/etc. by davegaramond · · Score: 1

      um, tar --files-from.

    2. Re:For Linux/FreeBSD/etc. by Rikus · · Score: 1

      Ah, I wasn't aware of that option, but I guess it's no surprise that it exists. I wasn't really meaning to criticize tar so much as emphasize the value of such a feature.

  3. Could be worse by skinfitz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Mac OSX has no backup at ALL. (ditto doesn't count).

    If you spring for '.Mac' you get a crappy buggy backup program, however by default the OS has no backup mechanism whatsoever aside from copying files.

    Yes OSX is essentially BSD but you can't even simply use tar as it won't store the weird resource fork data from the HFS+ filing system.

    About the simplest way to do it is using DiskUtility to make a virtual disk image and copy data into that using ditto, however this is rather longwinded and a simple Apple supported backup utility supplied with the OS would be greatly appreciated.

    1. Re:Could be worse by Rikus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe I'm wrong on this one, but it seems to me like the resource fork is on the way out. How many of your applications/files actually use the resource fork in OS X?
      The primary exception seems to be OS 9 stuff.

    2. Re:Could be worse by skinfitz · · Score: 1

      You would be both amazed and appalled. Most OSX application files use the resource fork from my experience.

    3. Re:Could be worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't been a Mac user in a long, long time (system 7), but I always thought the resource fork was pretty neat. You no longer need to spread your files out across /usr/local/share and wherever else... everything that your application needs is right there in the single binary. And certainly as a programmer it made things easier to just be able to say "give me icon #0014".

      I dunno, I imagine it sucks since apparently normally UNIX utilities don't work with it, but discounting that, it seems like a pretty cool feature.

    4. Re:Could be worse by topologist · · Score: 1

      Take a look at this page.

    5. Re:Could be worse by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      hfspax has worked fine for me. It's free.

    6. Re:Could be worse by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Get Dantz Retrospect. I've used it for years to backup and restore Mac OS 9 and Mac OS X systems.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    7. Re:Could be worse by numbski · · Score: 3, Informative
      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    8. Re:Could be worse by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 0, Troll

      You know, on Windows we no longer need to spread our files out across whatever, because Windows actually has this concept where you and your programs dictate directory structure rather than having 20 different bin, share, and etc directories.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    9. Re:Could be worse by eric76 · · Score: 1

      I use gnutar to backup files on the Mac.

    10. Re:Could be worse by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      Too bad all your programs write 1MB of crap into 20 different registry locations.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    11. Re:Could be worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since those windows programs are often written by idiots, that's not actually an advantage.

      Linux is only slightly better -- the programs written by idiots are re-packaged for each distribution by another idiot, who hopefully is at least a consistent idiot and at least uses a package system that allows you to track down where all the files went.

      I think OSX has a better way -- applications put all their stuff in one single directory, and $PATH is automatically built up to include all those directories. I haven't had too much experience with it though.

    12. Re:Could be worse by Noksagt · · Score: 1

      XTAR comes highly recommended as well.

    13. Re:Could be worse by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 1

      Well, if skinfitz doesn't think ditto (which generates cpio archives with resource forks preserved) counts, then I doubt he or she thinks hfspax and hfstar count either.

      Which is reasonable to some degree... you can build backup mechanisms with either, but neither is Backup Software in the sense that normal Mac users are accustomed.

      Then again, I cringe at some of the shit that kind of backup software does- backing up a live filesystem? While the user is using it? No thanks.

      --
      --Matthew
    14. Re:Could be worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mac OSX has no backup at ALL.

      That's because it doesn't need one. Come on, how hard is it to drag your home directory over to a CD and hit 'burn'?

  4. Nero BackItUp by It's+People! · · Score: 5, Informative

    Although I've never used it before, Nero BackItUp appears to do what you're looking for. I've bought Ahead's software many times before, and their quality is fairly good. There's a trial version, too.

  5. Keep it simple by Masa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just put everything under one folder (for example "%USERPROFILE%\My Documents") and right-click the folder and just "send-to" to the CD Burner (at least under Windows XP). Shouldn't be hard to burn the whole directory hierarchy once in the while. I think this should be enough for majority of the home users who cannot figure out themselves, how to create more sophisticated backup scripts.

    1. Re:Keep it simple by dstillz · · Score: 2, Informative

      That would work fine if people didn't have 10GB+ "My Music" subfolders. :-D Even for 650MB of data or less, the WinXP burning wizard SUCKS, because it has to cache every file that it's going to copy to CD. On a one-disk, one-partition system, this is both absurd and slow. It then does what seems like more duplication during the "adding data to the CD image" phase. I'm no fan of Ahead/Nero's CD burning or backup software, but using either, you can have the first (or only) disk of your backup set burned long before the Windows CD writing wizard has finished setting itself up. Roxio's software, on which the Windows wizard is actually based, is no better than XP's built-in stuff.

    2. Re:Keep it simple by robosmurf · · Score: 1

      The Nero backup software also has the advantage that if you turn off the compression option, the actualy files are burnt as a standard filesystem, so in emergency you can still get at them without the backup software installed.

  6. Use Norton Ghost by scupper · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Use Norton Ghost by BrookHarty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mod this up, Ghost has been the best backup for some time...

      Myself, I just rar up My Documents with a recovery file and burn to CD. In fact, I rar up 700 meg sized files if I need to split over cds, and make the thing self extractable. Just put in the first cd and go. I'd use DVD, but after numerous dvd-/+r's, I still sometimes get coasters, I havnt had coasters on CD's in years.

      Now for incremental backups, youre looking into costly software. Enough cost, it might be cheaper to pick up a USB HD.

      I just wish I could back up 200+ gig HD's to disc of some kind. Make it easier to store, multiple copies, and free the hd's up for other use.

    2. Re:Use Norton Ghost by dgmartin98 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Incremental backups with RAR are easy. Use the command line version of RAR with:
      -ao Add files with Archive attribute set
      -ac Clear Archive attribute after compression or extraction

      In fact, here's the contents of my "incremental" batch file:

      rar a -agYYYY-MM-DD -u -ao -ac -as -ep2 -m2 -os -ow -r -ri3 -rr2p -ds -x@IgnoreList_Docs.txt D:\Backups\Weekly\Files_Docs_.rar @BackupList_Docs.txt

      I run that once a week, PGP-encrypt the file, burn to CD or DVD, and store off-site. I include an ignore list, and a list of files to backup.

      For a "full" backup, I use a batch file with this in it (same as above without the -ao):

      rar a -agYYYY-MM-DD -u -ac -as -ep2 -m2 -os -ow -r -ri3 -rr2p -ds -x@IgnoreList_Docs.txt D:\Backups\Weekly\Files_Docs_.rar @BackupList_Docs.txt

      If your directories to backup are large, you can use the option -v[k|b|f|m|M] to pick the volume size.

      --
      FPGA, Wireless, ASIC, Verilog, VHDL, HW, 10yr exp, Team Lead, Ottawa (More? Email above. slashdotusername=dgmartin98 )
    3. Re:Use Norton Ghost by quintessent · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. $69 is kind of spendy. Especially for a program that requires activation, so it may or may not work when you need it a few years down the road.

    4. Re:Use Norton Ghost by Jamesie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ghost is excellent for full image backups, I use it to backup to a spare hard disk and dvd and the images are browsable if you need to restore individual files.
      If you have a network or just a pc and a laptop you can easily backup over the network to any pc.

      I back up my system and data partitions only, I keep all my mp3's and images on a third partition and archive those seperately.

      Apart from that I have a 1gig thumb drive that I regularly copy my main documents to.

    5. Re:Use Norton Ghost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trolls don't use rar.

      We "move rar.exe ROR.exe". ROR is the only backup allowed for Troll archives.

    6. Re:Use Norton Ghost by TheLink · · Score: 3, Informative

      "I just wish I could back up 200+ gig HD's to disc of some kind. "

      You can. It's called another 200GB HDD.

      Seriously at USD0.50/GB it's not such a bad idea (compared to tape or other alternatives). Get one of those HDD tray/rack thingies so you can remove/add it easily.

      Would be great if cheap SATA hotswappable HDD trays/bays become widely available.

      --
    7. Re:Use Norton Ghost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? I have ghost 2003, no activation required for the command line version.

    8. Re:Use Norton Ghost by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 1

      Uh... tape is usually around USD0.35/GB. It's just that 200G backups take a lot of tapes, not that it's expensive.

      --
      --Matthew
    9. Re:Use Norton Ghost by pnutjam · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try Partimage, I use it and it works great. It's on Knoppix, but the System Rescue CD has a better release cycle.

    10. Re:Use Norton Ghost by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Which tape formats are you talking about?

      The tapes don't come with tape drives. The tape drives are often expensive (many cost as much as six or more 200GB HDDs). If you're talking about a format where 200GB = a lot of tapes, tape autoloaders are even more expensive.

      Price isn't the only cost, AFAIK most of these tape drives are slow - you'd take from 10 to 20 hours (or more) to backup 200GB assuming zero time taken to load and unload tapes. Whereas HDDs are 10x faster. When the time comes to restore from backups, I'd rather not have to wait 10-20 hours to restore.

      The prices for tape systems and media almost seem like a scam to me, for what they do and the limitations they have.

      If SATA hotswap becomes practical, I'd use HDDs for backups without a thought (unless there's something else better). Sure HDDs are more fragile than tapes in many ways. But tape drives seem to "eat" tapes every now and then, more often than I'd thought acceptable. After all the frigging data is supposed to be more important than the drive.

      Maybe tapes make sense if you're a huge enterprise with tons and tons of backups. But for home use, get a few HDDs and use them as backup media+drive.

      Still I don't see how the numbers add up. Do show me how tapes are cheaper if you include the drive for say 24 backups (3 yrs + 11 mths + 4 wks + 6 days).

      --
  7. Bash Script by atomic-penguin · · Score: 1

    I wrote a little bash script to automate the job. It works on linux and other UN*X-like systems. Actually all it does is write out tarballs in CD sized chunks, then you just burn the .tar files to CD. Because backups may span multiple tapes, tar has some legacy code that lets you span multiple backup destinations. The downside you can't use compression with spanned tars. The upside is if one of your backup tars fails you can still recover the rest of your data (the spanned tars are not dependent on one another).

    Here is a link to the documentation and download:
    http://lug.concord.edu/meetings/1015200 3.html

    cached link:
    http://lug.concord.edu.nyud.net:8090/meetin gs/10152003.html

    --
    /^([Ss]ame [Bb]at (time, |channel.)){2}$/
    1. Re:Bash Script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
  8. Dar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I have not had to use windows very much yet -- so far, using WinSCP to copy a couple of files to a real server has been ok.

    However, I am starting work on project that has a windows port. I would like to scriptify the backup of windows using dar. Dar is like tar, but compresses, and has the ability to split archives across media (like multiple CDRs). I have not actually used it to recover anything yet, even on linux. My plan is to make automated backups on linux and windows, that put the win32 and the linux executable on the CDR so I can be assured of being able to read it anywhere.

    That said, I have some questions of my own for you windows weinies.

    1) How do you download windows updates into some kind of file that you can put on a CD and use to update a computer that has no internet connection or is on a modem or so virused it crashes by itself after 10 minutes of thrashing on each bootup ? When I go to windowsupdate.com, it notices that I visiting it using Linux and refuses to help me at all.

    2) Similarly, I want to download windows media player to put on the same non-connected machine. The windows site won't let me download anything, because again, it detects that I am visiting the site from Linux.

    3) What's the best free software that will scan a machine and clean off all the viruses without de-configuring the sound card, returning the video to 640x480, etc ?

    1. Re:Dar by __aatgod8309 · · Score: 1

      1) Try the MS download site, not the Windows Update site. (Although you'll have to download the patches individually that way) AutoPatcher is a handy alternative for Win2k/XP/2k3, but the XP release doesn't work with SP2 as yet.

      2) Try the MS Download site.

      3) For windows? I use AVG Anti-Virus.

  9. Backup to CD-R under Windows by lil_nohreaga · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've used http://www.handybackup.com/ for several clients and have been very pleased with the results thus far. It allows you to backup to cd-r, network, or ftp and allows the backup to be scheduled in a wide variety of ways.

  10. Perl Script by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    I wrote a perl script to do it all for me, then didnt use it for a couple months, fell hundreds of gigabytes behind, and gave up again.
    Now waiting for somebody to make a consumer-level WORM drive designed for constant use- 99% of my data I never change, I suspect it's true for most people (You needed all that space to install [insert product] and the files it creates are < 10MB.. what WORM options are there? I mean, other than two DVD-R drives and a robotic 200-disc changer.. right now it seems much cheaper (*factoring in Time, which as we know == money) to buy R/W drives and get a couple new ones whenever a single high-end(consumer) unit can hold half to all of what the previous drives have. (it's been working so far)

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  11. WTF are you talking about ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not talking about the fact that the majority of your post is one long mental diarhea of a run-on sentence. Haven't you noticed that actual harddrives are far cheaper per GB than any WORM device will ever be ?

    1. Re:WTF are you talking about ? by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      "Haven't you noticed that actual harddrives are far cheaper per GB than any WORM device will ever be ?"

      Wow, it's almost as if you read what I wrote and understood it just enough to paraphrase it.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  12. Handy Backup by Mr.Ned · · Score: 1

    http://www.handybackup.com/

    I set it up for some friends and it's worked well. Scheduling, automatic backups, backups to just about anything (CD/DVD/FTP/filesystem location), multivolume backups. Cheap, too.

  13. When It Comes To Your Parents, Trust Walt by matt.fotter · · Score: 2, Informative

    He knows all and speaks in a way that doesn't make thier eyes gloss over.

    --
    quis fimum scribit?
    1. Re:When It Comes To Your Parents, Trust Walt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that that method uses a re-writeable medium (a harddisk) that stays connected all the time means that your backup will get infested with same virus that got the rest of the machine.

      Backups have to be non-writeable, or at least non-writeable without human intervention.

      The CD-R method also encourages the user to take the CDs to a physically separate location.

    2. Re:When It Comes To Your Parents, Trust Walt by matt.fotter · · Score: 1

      O had the impression the poster was talking about home users. You're comments are valid, however, for a lot of home user, paretny kinda people, offsite just isn't going to happen. And if the files I'm backing up are infested (say a word marco virus) even if they are on ROM media doesn't really protect them. I can't even imagine trying to get the "spanning cds" concept across to my 84 year old step grandmother. She still doesn't trust that "Start" is where you go to stop the computer.

      For these things I always weigh the "how many calls will I get" value.

      --
      quis fimum scribit?
  14. People still use CDR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, a good DVD burner is like $50, and an excellent 16x DVD burner is like $75 (NEC 3500).

    Why use CDR at all? There's not space on those things. DVD-R is cheap. DVD+RW is like a hard drive. You can backup, then add more later. Then erase the thing and start over.

    1. Re:People still use CDR? by phsdv · · Score: 1

      Even DVD backup is not easy. I have about 20 DVDs lying around with part of my files backed up on them. However, also a few giga byte is still not backed up. How do I determine what is backed up and what not? And how do I find back, the files on all those DVDs? There is not good and easy tool for this (on Widows)....

    2. Re:People still use CDR? by Hast · · Score: 1

      The easy and quite useful way to do it is to save a complete dir listing of the disk on HDD ( dir /s > DVD_N.txt in Win32 ). Then just search those files, it should even include the date/time it was written, ie the backup date of the file, which is useful.

  15. Second Copy by rueger · · Score: 2, Informative

    Although we use it to backup files to a networked PC,not to CDR, we have been very happy with Second Copy.

    It's affordable at $29.95 for one user, with bulk pricing for multiuser environments.

    It's easy to use, will backup or synchronize files or directories, and works well over a network. And yes, it will back up to CDR. Right now we use it to backup and or sync five systems. Run it once daily and Bob's Yer Uncle.

    1. Re:Second Copy by topham · · Score: 1


      I don't like Bob.
      I don't want him as my Uncle.
      Can we negotiate that part?

  16. Retrospect Express by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Informative

    I normally use Retrospect Express for desktop backups.

    Burns to CDR, fast, super-easy to use, and has some excellent scheduling features.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    1. Re:Retrospect Express by Detritus · · Score: 2, Informative
      I use it for both Windows and Mac OS X. It works great.

      Check their hardware compatibility list before you buy it. It can be picky about backup hardware. It uses CD/DVD features that are not always implemented fully or properly on some drives.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  17. DFIncBackup by Sandman1971 · · Score: 2, Informative

    In my windows boxes, I use a freeware program called DFIncBackup. Does full, incremental, etc... to any media (including network shares, DVD, CDR, etc...). You can also indicate file extensions to backup, or ignore, split large archives, backup to zip file, create templates, etc... Probably one of the best in freeware (and shareware and pay). I've had to restore only once, and it worked flawlessly.

    --
    It's better to burn out than to fade away
  18. Retrospect by Parsec · · Score: 1

    Dantz Retrospect has a good UI, should be fairly easy for somewhat savvy users.

  19. Faster better cheaper by salesgeek · · Score: 1

    Buy a couple of 60 GB drives and removable trays.

    Done.

    --
    -- $G
  20. simple, non-incremental stuff by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    The simplest, non-incremental solution, is to boot some form of Linux. I chose RIP last time I had to do this. I don't remember if it had cdrecord, but it had reiser4, captive-ntfs, and loaded everything into RAM on boot (fairly quickly) so that you could eject the disk. The script, though ugly, can be understood well enough to set up your own backup script which runs each boot.

    As for the backup itself, I just used tar, piped the compressed version straight into cdrecord, using stdin and a huge buffer. When I needed to back up something bigger than one cd, it was a disk image, so it was easy enough to just pipe 'dd' from certain offsets into cdrecord, and write the offset on the physical disk label (with a Sharpie).

    There's a program called "split" which might help if you need to split one tar across multiple cds. Again, to avoid having to deal with Captive slowness, I can do this all in RAM. The trick is to set up some fifos, run "tar ... | split ...", have the fifo's catch the files, and "cat" them into cdrecord. To join them back together, you recreate the same fifos, do "cat fifo1 fifo2 fifo3... | tar -xjp...", pop the CDs in one at a time, and dd (or cat) the CD device, piped into the fifos.

    Unfortunately, it might take some use of Perl and Captive-NTFS for me to make it incremental (only backup changes). But I've never actually wanted to do that -- this is usually for when I'm stranded without networking or Internet.

    When I do have Internet, I have a dedicated backup server, which I backup to with either some simple rsync scripts or BackupPC. BackupPC is very, very close to being able to do fully incremental backups forever, and purging the oldest ones when it runs out of space. Furthermore, it can use many, many ways of backing up. My favorites are rsync over ssh for unix boxes and samba for Windows boxes.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:simple, non-incremental stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A thought came up regarding incremental backup from linux.

      You could have all applications in a separate partition, and have two small Windows OS and user data partitions.

      Then use rsync in linux to synchronize the two windows partitions. This would be incremental since rsync only copies changed/new files to make exact replica. Rsync even has a way to make a 2nd backup copy of incremental files to a different location. You can then burn the partitions to cd-r from linux.

      No fancy scripts needed at all.

    2. Re:simple, non-incremental stuff by angle_slam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The AskSlashdot question was for a simple backup method that can be used by (presumably non-tech) friends. Booting linux and using "tar, cdredord, stdin, and a huge buffer" is probably too much for the typical user who just wants to save his emails and photos.

  21. CD-ROMs are small. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about easy[1] automatic[2] incremental DVD-R backups under Linux?

    WTF[3]?

    [1] Easy, as in I don't need to learn C++, Python, PHP, Perl, or set up MySQL

    [2] Automatic, as in, spit "Please insert a disk for the daily incremental" onto the console, wait indefinately for that to happen (as signified by the insertion of a blank DVD), and then reliably make and verify said incremental backup

    [3] Aren't we in 2004 yet? ISTR better backup solutions in the 80s.

  22. if you have a few PCs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This might end up lost in oblivion since I'm posting as AC, but just in case...

    I run several PCs, older ones of which were basically free because they use cast-off hardware from when I upgraded my main PC.

    Then, HD space is about the cheapest backup you can get. I use rdist to sync things between several PCs, which act as mutual live backups to each other.

    It generally works very well: the chance if all HDs failing at once is really small. On the other hand, you do also have disadvantages compared to CD or DVD backups. For one, you don't get geographical dispersal, so a fire or other calamity can take out all your data at once.

    Still, you sure as hell can't beat the sheer convenience of it. And there's no "restore" per se to worry about. If one machine dies, I just move to another until I get a replacement HD for the first one. Reinstall Linux, re-rdist, and I'm good to go.

    For archival backups on long term media, I'd stick with some standard format such as tar files. I wouldn't trust that I could read some proprietary backup format in the future. I have tarballs I've made on a VAX 11/780 in 1982 which I can still read today. Longevity of your backup format matters almost more than the physical media does, IMHO.

    1. Re:if you have a few PCs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Umm, that's redundancy, not backup. What happens if your system gets cracked, or a virus gets in and ALL online storage gets wiped? You will have a bunch of functioning but corrupted hard disks with no way to roll back to a previous version.

      That's why backups need to be on some form of media which needs manual intervention to access (eg.removable).

  23. Carbon Copy Cloner for OS X by Zathras26 · · Score: 1

    I use Carbon Copy Cloner on my PowerBook to mirror my entire hard drive to an external 60 GB USB 2.0 hard drive. CCC is supposed to make external drives bootable as well, but I've had trouble getting it to do that.

    It's not the ideal solution, since it obviously means that if any data on my PowerBook's HD gets corrupted, I'll just be cloning over that corruption. I'm probably going to start doing separate backups to CD-R and/or CD-RW to ensure additional data integrity. But I do like the simplicity of having a complete mirror of my PowerBook's HD on another HD if the drive in my PowerBook should ever fail -- restoration will be that much easier.

  24. All i have to say is.... by Xypheri · · Score: 1

    I love my Iomega Rev! [insert clicking sound here :P ] No seriusly I havnt had a single problem with it. and the filesystem is the open starndard and avalible to windows mac and linux alike UDF filesystem.

  25. Uh, backup software? by melatonin · · Score: 1

    Seriously, there's got to be decent backup software for Windows, especially considering how many corporate environments it's used in. It's a pretty common and critical piece of software.

    On the Mac there's Retrospect among others. Toast will also do incremental backups to CD. Also, it's not hard to do a search for all documents modified after some date and back them up if you really want to do it that way. On the Mac, it'd be pretty easy to encapsulate in an AppleScript, although I realize it's not everyone's cup of tea.

    Hey, you could also use a combination of the Unix find command combined with ditto, pax & bzip2.

    --
    Moderators should have to take a reading comprehension test.
    1. Re:Uh, backup software? by Noksagt · · Score: 1

      A lot of corporate environments choose network backup if anything.

      Retrospect is also on the PC. I assume that EZ CD Creator (also by Adaptec (just as with Toast)) will do incremental backups. If not, other CD software (such as Nero) will.

      I have found Unix backups to usually use the same things as Amanda: tar and/or dump.

      I think the poster was just trolling for some free/cheap suggestions & I think he's been give a few.

  26. WSH and Easy CD Creator by simplypeachy · · Score: 1

    I have a task-scheduled Windows Scripting Host script that runs NTBackup, zips it, defrags it, tests the zip, then exports the registry and does the same to that. It does this early in the morning just after the PC turns itself on, while I'm not using it.

    It finally takes an sha1 of the job lot, and I then fire up Easy CD Creator and burn the lot to CD, finally verifying the sha1 sum.

    I've been thinking about getting a few USB 2 external hard drive enclosures and using them.
    But for the moment I have plenty of space left on a 700MB CD-RW and it doesn't take too long to burn, I'm usually eating breakfast once I've set it going anyway.

    I take disk images using PowerQuest DriveImage 7 and once a week or so copy them plus all my MP3s, downloads etc. onto a removable hard disk which uses an internal 5 1/4" removable tray. Not quite as nifty as a USB enc would be, as you have to power the machine off first. But at least that way I've got 160GB of fast(er) storage when I need it.

    I'm sure for a home-user environment where they're not tech savvy you could do the above but onto a USB hard drive and have them unplug it after it's backed up and keep it safe.

    HTH

  27. I want bare-metal restore by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    Insert DVD #1 of N, boot machine.
    Enter some basic info
    Confirm full restore
    Swap disks as needed
    Reboot

    None of this: install XP, then SP1, then drivers for your video card, then IE 6.1.666, then your backup/restore sw, then restore overwriting the Registry, reboot, blue screen, reboot in safe mode, reboot again, done.

    I just moved an XP install from 1 disk to another using this hideous, kludgy method.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:I want bare-metal restore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did that for a while - bare installation of XP with SP1 and some software from CDs that I didn't want to get out a cupboard. Used a old verion of Drive Image (which came free with a magazine) and made a 3 CD restore set.

      Get sick of the installation, throw the bootdisk and CD in their drives and restore. Only problem was it wouldn't occupy the entire drive and I had to partition it manually to get the entire space (after shifting to a 40gig to 120gig HDD)

      I've been meaning to repeat the process with SP2, but I'm too lazy and I felt like doing it the long way for once.

  28. Try Acronis. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 3, Insightful


    For full image backups, try Acronis. Symantec learned customer care from Microsoft, it appears.

    With Acronis, you can make a full system drive backup of Windows XP while Windows is running.

    Last time I checked, Ghost was VERY quirky.

    --
    U.S. Gov.: Borrowing money to kill Iraqis. 140 billion borrowed. With interest, you pay 200 billion.

    1. Re:Try Acronis. by Jamesie · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, Ghost was VERY quirky.

      Quirky? How? I have been using it for a few years now and have had no quirks!
      Unlike Acronis, Ghost does reboot into dos if you want to back up the system drive but I wouldn't call that quirky, just cautious.

    2. Re:Try Acronis. by Milican · · Score: 1

      I like Ghost, but haven't used it in a while. Can it write to NTFS yet? If not then I am limited to 4 GB files and that isn't handy anymore. Also, does it support external USB and Firewire drives well? Last time I used it did not. Those are my only questions.

      JOhn

    3. Re:Try Acronis. by Jamesie · · Score: 1

      It's been able to write to NTFS for a while and I have seen the tabs for external drive support but I don't use external drives, so presumably that's been added and works (I am an optomist).

  29. Acronis TrueImage saves my butt regularly by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2, Informative
    I wouldn't do this for any other commercial program, but I really have to sing the praises of Acronis TrueImage. It really makes me feel safe in this world of flaky hardware.

    The principle behind it is that it backs up entire partitions so that they can be reconstituted bit-for-bit as they were when the backup was made. Since version 7, there has been an option to do incremental backups. The compression ratio is wonderful. I have a 2GB partition with Windows XP and all the Windows programs that I use, and the image file that TrueImage makes of it fits on a 700MB CD! What's more, you can burn a recovery CD that boots directly (TrueImage is based on Linux) and has full backup/restore functionality. Oh, and in Windows you can "mount" the backed-up partition images so that they appear as a read-only drive with its own letter--in case you just need to recover a couple of files from a backup and not the whole thing. Really, I don't know what they'll do for 8.0, because I think 7.0 is just about the perfect backup program, and it's so easy that even a lazy guy like me has developed good habits about backups.

  30. Not sure by EvilNutSack · · Score: 1

    If CDBurnerXP supports backing up yet, but I think we can expect it to be in future versions of the software. It's a good free alternative to Nero and the developers are pretty responsive to new feature requests so it's worth keeping in mind.

    --
    --
  31. I use knoppix and dd by TheLink · · Score: 4, Informative

    You need another HDD or a fileserver (with network).

    Assuming you want to backup first ata hdd on target system.

    Boot Knoppix on system to be backed up-
    Use:
    knoppix 2 noswap
    or
    knoppix noswap
    (latter if you have enough ram + cpu and you still want to browse the web etc whilst backing up ;) ).

    Then mount the drive/share you want to put the backups to.
    e.g. mount -t smbfs -o username=blah //fileserver/backup /mnt/test

    or mount /dev/hdc /mnt/test (if have another hdd).

    mkdir /mnt/test/20041010

    dd if=/dev/hda bs=131072 | lzop -c | split -b 650m - /mnt/test/20041010/machinename-hda-lzo-

    This creates files that are 650MB in size. You can burn these to CD-Rs. I prefer to leave a bit of unused space at the CD-R's edge (some seem to peel off there).

    Note: that there are reports that dd in linux in some cases doesn't copy the last byte.

    Also you may have to manually turn on DMA access on the HDD using hdparm, for speed.

    To restore you do a similar thing - boot knoppix.

    then mount the restore drive/fileserver (readonly if paranoid).

    Then:
    cat /mnt/test/20041010/machinename-hda-lzo-* | lzop -d > /dev/hda

    I'm not 100% sure of the command-line parameters. But that's the general principle. I have successfully backed up and restored a number of images this way.

    I use lzop because it is faster than gzip - with lzop I can get an average of 30MB/sec with an Athlon 2000XP - not far from max HDD transfer rate, for not much worse compression ratio. gzip is 2 to 3 times slower. Unfortunately lzop seems to be giving me an error in Knoppix 3.6 when I try to decompress. I'm mainly using Knoppix 3.3 though.

    Don't forget: CD-Rs can be flaky backup media. Assuming a 40GB HDD compresses to 15-20GB, you'll need about 25 CD-Rs. If any of these don't work you can't restore successfully. So you may need to double the number for redundancy. That is a lot of trouble.

    I actually suggest buying a few spare big HDDs and backup to them.

    Per GB they're not much more expensive than CD-Rs.

    100-200GB drives are about twice the price per GB compared to CD-Rs, and probably less flaky, problematic and troublesome for long term storage (plus take up less space than 150-300 CD-Rs). Just don't drop them and keep them in a safe dry + cool place (packed with dehumidifiers), e.g. data-grade fireproof safe. Buy multiple different brands of HDDs if you're paranoid.

    --
    1. Re:I use knoppix and dd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You just posted a bunch of weird looking command lines that Windows XP users are supposed to use.

      My bet is most of them are quivering in the corner with a blanket calling for mommy after reading that.

    2. Re:I use knoppix and dd by TheLink · · Score: 1

      "You just posted a bunch of weird looking command lines that Windows XP users are supposed to use. My bet is most of them are quivering in the corner with a blanket calling for mommy after reading that."

      Hehe. Point taken.

      BUT, my bet is most of them won't even notice my post flash past their screen ;). They don't see any dialog boxes etc etc.

      But for some reason same users are able to open messages containing worm infested encrypted zipfiles, enter the relevant passwords (included in message), and successfully extract the worms and run them without help from IT personnel.

      I wonder if some may even have no memory of doing all that.

      --
  32. We use Snapshot EFB by synq · · Score: 1

    It's a nice multi platform piece of software created by a company called SysV from Australia.
    It does backup based on md5 checksums, backing up only what has really changed.

    We even use it to do internet backup (sorry, it's Dutch).

    --
    sig not found
  33. Anyone tried Peter's Backup? by perlfool · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I noticed the Peter's Backup project on SourceForge. It looks like it has most of the features requested. I haven't tried it yet, but I think I will.

  34. Network backup by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 1
    If you have more than one computer on your local network, then why not have them backup to each other? It's much more convenient (and reliable) than messing with CD-Rs. On Linux this is pretty simple to do with 'cron' and 'rsync'. On Windows, there are some tools coming onto the market right now to do the same thing and I'm going to shamelessly plug my own. It's called Magic Mirror Backup and you can download it at http://www.pensamos.com/mmb/ . Version 1.0 is free, it works on Windows and Linux, and it will make automatic, daily backups for you without having to mess with CD-Rs, tapes, or other media.

    What happens if something like a hurricane destroys all your computers at once? (Realistically, you would need to ask yourself the same question if you used CD-Rs or tapes - if something wipes out your home/office, those backups are likely to be gone too.) There is also an option to backup to an off-site server. The server software is plain old PHP and should run on most commodity $3/month web hosting services, making for a relatively cheap, do-it-yourself backup. I haven't decided yet whether to just offer a (paid) monthly service myself or to release the PHP code so that people can set up their own servers. I'm open to feedback. The local P2P backup will remain free for the first version, in any case.

  35. simplebackup by GrumpySimon · · Score: 1

    I've been using simplebackup for a few months now. It's the best free (libre & gratis) solution I've found.

    It allows you to backup certain directories, ignore others, archive incrementally, differentially or completely in any one of a number of formats (zip, tar.gz, tar, rar of the top of my head). It also has volume spanning.

    Downside - you do have to edit a text config file (so it's not for you average windows user), but it's fairly trivial to set up a few batch files ("back up my pictures now!", "back up my documents now!") etc.

    It's written in perl, so you'll need to have active perl installed on windows, but it also works nicely on linux and osx (although you may want to use one of those tars which can deal with the resource forks mentioned earlier in the thread).

  36. what i do (secure 4 GB disks, backed up to DVD) by quinxy · · Score: 2, Informative
    This isn't an answer to your question exactly, it's just my approach to most of your problem.

    I use a secure disk program (Bestcrypt, for Windows and Linux) to create mountable, secured virtual drives. I make each disk just under the limit for the burnable media, I bought a DVD burner, and given the limits of the DVD format the largest single file is 3.99 GB. I have two main virtual disks I use, one I mount every time I use the system (for desktop, email, favorites, etc.), the other is for things I use far less often (photos, archived projects, etc.). And every week (at least) I burn the main disk to DVD (less often for the other disk). Before I had a DVD drive I did the same thing with containers that were only 650MB).

    I use a separate backup script to backup all the non-unique data (programs, system, etc.) to another hard drive.

    (I've had a laptop stolen from my house years ago by burglars who broke in, and with the personal files, banking info, etc. that one keeps on their PC these days, security can't be ignored.) quincy

    --
    Don't vote for Eugene Papansanovich for Congress!
  37. Acronis is very easy to use. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    Acronis works perfectly when making backups from inside Windows XP. I've used it with several different motherboards (about 8 different kinds).

    I don't have time to discuss the quirkiness of Ghost. However, the quirkiness was verified by Symantec technical support. I was told that many other people had discussed the same issues. If you know Ghost already, it is probably easy. I found reading the disorganized Ghost manual quite time-consuming. I find Symantec technical support very abusive and ignorant.

    Acronis is very easy to use. Acronis uses a safe method of backing up, it just makes a sector backup of any file that is changed during the hard drive backup, so the backup you get is the hard drive when you started the backup.

    Note that PowerQuest DriveImage is now owned by Symantec.

    1. Re:Acronis is very easy to use. by Jamesie · · Score: 1

      I don't have time to discuss the quirkiness of Ghost.

      Ah, one of those mysteriously undiscussable quirkinesses that usually turn out to be non existant quirkiness that boils down to user quirkiness.

  38. use linux to backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This method would only work if you use FAT* filesystem for windows, which I do even for Windows XP on my laptop, solely due to this reason.

    Have Linux in your PC, and enough partition space to back up windows directories (200MB for windows 9x, and 800MB for XP). Boot to linux, then gzip and tar the whole windows directory, Doc*, and Programs*. Burn it to cd-r from linux.

    I don't backup applications, since I only have a few to back up anyway, in a different partition, and nothing critical (some games and educational sw). There is minimal number of sw, and no network-related software, which also reduces headaches with maintenance.

    Windows then can fit in one cd-r.

    I had to restore Windows couple of times, and it always worked. The application partition never crashed, and I wouldn't have spent much time re-installing a few applications anyway. It was always the configuration settings and updates in the OS that took so much time.

    Again, this only works if your hardware doesn't change much and you don't install new software that frequently.

  39. Even Better: Compressed Disk Images to iPod by j0kkk3l · · Score: 1

    I use Appleskript to create Compressed Diskimages that are then transferred to my iPod. One Klick is enough. I don't have to worry about filesize or resource forks.

    1. Re:Even Better: Compressed Disk Images to iPod by skinfitz · · Score: 1

      I thougth iPods only came in sizes up to 40Gb?

      I have 2Tb to back up.

  40. Doing it with shell scripts by andylievertz · · Score: 2, Informative
    I wrote bash shell scripts to make full (Sunday) and differential (Monday through Saturday) backups of key parts of my filesystems. This is the basic structure of the script which runs every day as a cron job:
    #!/bin/bash

    DATE=`/bin/date +%Y%m%d`
    LAST_SUNDAY=`/bin/date -d "last sunday" +%Y%m%d`
    DIRECTORIES="/boot /etc /root /var /home"

    # perform a full or differential backup based on [Sunday|!Sunday]
    case `/bin/date +%A` in
    Sunday)
    # perform a full backup
    tar cfj /backup/$DATE-full.tar.bz2 $DIRECTORIES
    chmod 600 /backup/$DATE-full.tar.bz2
    ;;
    *)
    # perform a differential backup
    tar cfj /backup/$DATE-diff.tar.bz2 $DIRECTORIES -N $LAST_SUNDAY
    chmod 600 /backup/$DATE-diff.tar.bz2
    ;;
    esac

    Then I back the full up to CD-R on Sunday using another script, which also runs as a cron job (you just have to remember to load the CD before you go home for the weekend!):
    #!/bin/bash

    DATE=`/bin/date +%Y%m%d`
    mkisofs -R /backup/$DATE-full.tar.bz2 | cdrecord -eject dev=/dev/cdrom -

    Good Luck! Andy
    --
    In Soviet Russia, the signature reads YOU!
  41. Eternal archival system by murdie · · Score: 1

    For Linux, though apparently not yet for Windows and MacOS X, there is the Eternal archival system. See http://www.parvat.com/index.php?PAGE=products/eter nal/home.php and http://linux-bangalore.org/2003/schedules/talkdeta ils.php?talkcode=C403.

  42. partimage = free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://www.partimage.org

    It'll backup across a network or to pretty much whatever you want. Also you can make a boot disk and use it to back up a non-Linux OS.

  43. Backups to DVD/CD by lintocs · · Score: 1

    I have both Windows and Linux desktops at home, and I never backup anything. The way I figure it, all the software on my Windows box came on CDs, so I already have backup copies of everything I paid for, and I don't have reams of data just lying around on my HD that I need to backup. If it weren't for the occasional crash, I'd probably never reinstall my PC, so my Athlon XP 2800+ would run like a 486/66. Linux changes so much and so often, you pretty much have to reinstall twice a year anyway, if you want to stay current, so I don't see an issue there either... and of course, all PC hardware is obsolete after 18 months, so reinstalling periodically is inevitable. (Sarcasm mode off)

  44. XXCOPY by tommy_traceroute · · Score: 1

    XXCOPY Haven't personally used it to backup onto DVD or CDR's before, but have heard of it being done successfully/easily by others.

    Incredibly versatile tool. For my system backup I just use XXCOPY to clone my whole 'doze drive onto a spare HD loaded in a removable drive tray. When done, I have a complete, bootable backup sitting on the shelf for the next all-too-frequent catastrophe.

    Oh yah, and it's free.

    --
    o 1 Sig beneath your current threshold
  45. GHOST by ezonme · · Score: 1

    Is the king of the hill...
    backup entire disk/partitions to bootable cd's or dvd's that are a breeze to restore.

  46. Why One and Not the Other? by Pooua · · Score: 1
    Microsoft has been bundling applications and utilities with their OS ever since DOS Version 1, but rarely ever has been sued for that explicit reason. This should lead you to question your cause-and-effect scenario, that MS gets sued merely for offering free software. With a little more investigation and intellectual honesty, you would discover that the complaints are due to the conditions MS imposes when it provides its "free" software.

    But, there is another point, too. MS has long offered backup software with its OS. Allowing that software to back up to another device does not add another piece of bundled software; it improves the functionality of the software already on the computer. Comparing this added functionality of an already existing piece of software to the browser MS bundled with its OS is like comparing apples and oranges.

    --
    Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
  47. External Harddrive by gtpilot · · Score: 2, Informative

    Honestly I can't stress how much I value my external harddrive. I have a laptop, and beyond addition storage, I use the HD for a good deal of backups.

    Sure it's more expensive than CD-Rs, but you get a ton more storage, and a heck of a lot faster (not to mention the added space if you want it), and you can get some great deals (I got an enclosure and 120GB for $90) on USB2 or firewire external drives from http://www.pricewatch.com/ (just be sure you are buying the combo and not just an enclosure).

    With this kind of space and speed, you can zip or rar files and folders and copy them over. More importantly, you can easily image a drive using one of the utilities already mentioned, and not have to worry nearly as much about fitting it onto 700 or 650 MB.

    And with HDs going for about $1 a GB I would also suggest not quickly running to CD, perhaps just by a second internal drive.

  48. So write a file to disk and then write it to CDR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, so you need enough disk space for another copy of what you're writing, but you should have 650Mb free (assuming we're primarily talking CDRs rather than DVDRs).

    That's what the MS site says, too (albeit not very clearly).