Slashdot Mirror


A New Species Of Giant Ape?

jd writes "The New Scientist, The Age (an Australian newspaper), Daily Telegraph (a British newspaper), BBC, and the Discovery Channel are talking excitedly about a strange primate, found in the Congo. Locals say it is notorious for killing fully-grown adult lions. Optimists hope that it is a new species, maybe related to the gorilla. Pessimists claim it's an overgrown chimpanzee. In either case, primates aren't discovered every day, making this a rare find indeed."

13 of 398 comments (clear)

  1. Didn't we discuss this last year? by joeykiller · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wasn't this story reported -- and discussed here -- in august last year as well?

    http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08 /1 0/0014206&tid=134&tid=14

    (Of course, I didn't RTFA)

    1. Re:Didn't we discuss this last year? by metlin · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, but while the previous article seemed uncertain of the discovery, these seem fairly conclusive.

      Plus, they have taken pictures of them while earlier on they were mostly speculative. Not to mention first hand physiological details.

      Not really a repeat - more of a follow up, IMHO.

    2. Re:Didn't we discuss this last year? by pe1rxq · · Score: 3, Informative

      Incomplete followups to be precise....
      DNA test have proven it to be chimps. Just large ones. But that probably wasn't exiting enought for the mainstream press.

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
  2. More information by polyp2000 · · Score: 3, Informative

    this seems to be related and has pictures and better info - just look at the size of those footprints?

    http://karlammann.com/bondo.html

    Bigfoot ?

    Nick...

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  3. Re:no photos? by pe1rxq · · Score: 2, Informative

    Its nothing more than sensationalist press...
    The apes do exist but they are simply chimpansees. According to collected DNA not even a new subspecies but part of the 'schweinfurthii' family.

    They just get larger then most chimps, which is not totally uncommon.

    Jeroen

    --
    Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
  4. Re:whoa...actually went back and RTFA... by Arker · · Score: 2, Informative

    and IMHO, with the exception of the coloration and the stone paddles, these "new" primates seem to resemble the grey gorillas in Michael Crichton's (sp?) Congo quite well

    Hardly surprising - his book was inspired by the same tales that brought researchers to the same area, looking for the same creatures.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  5. Re:no photos? by Arker · · Score: 5, Informative

    Try here.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  6. Re:whoa...actually went back and RTFA... by lee7guy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, the BBC article removed the quote from it's context.

    From Daily Telegraph:


    "We could hear them in the trees, about 20 feet away," she said. "My tracker made a sound of an injured duiker [antelope] and four came rushing through the brush towards me.

    "If this had been a bluff charge, they would have been screaming to intimidate us. These guys were quiet. And they were huge. They were coming in for the kill. I was directly in front of them, and as soon as they saw my face, they stopped and disappeared."


    The apes thought they were going after a wounded antelope, when they realized they had been tricked, they ran away.

    Guess BBC found it more "dramatic" out of context.

    --
    Ceterum censeo Microsoftem esse delendam
  7. Re:no photos? by efatapo · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://karlammann.com/bondo.html They printed the phylogenetic tree as well as wrote up the findings. I lazily skimmed the text but the phylogenetic tree makes it look not that exciting. A new subspecies but not very diverse from other known species. Enjoy~

  8. Link WARNING! by minus_273 · · Score: 3, Informative

    for the faint at heart, the link contains a lot of pictures, among them a rather disturbing picture of a semi decapitated ape with a lot of blood. Given how human they look, it might not be suitable for all.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  9. Re:no photos? by pe1rxq · · Score: 2, Informative

    A dutch news site:
    http://www.vpro.nl/wetenschap/index.shtml?3626936+ 4257491+19433379

    On the left side you can see some photos and a family tree. The yellow spots are where the DNA samples fitted in the tree.

    Jeroen

    --
    Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
  10. Re:no photos? by pe1rxq · · Score: 2, Informative

    Even the reports on the behaviour are overstated:
    -only the males nest on the ground, females nest in the trees. And the simple explanation is that they are to heavy to have good support in a tree.
    -The nests are not like gorilla's (besides the fact that they also don't sleep in trees) The chimps nest in moist places, gorillas hate water and would never do that.
    (I don't sleep in a tree, does that make me half-gorilla?)
    -They don't howl at the moon, but are simply more vocal on moon lit nights.

    They might be interesting because of there (size related) behaviour but the articles are definitly based on some sensationalist pseudo scientists.

    Jeroen

    --
    Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
  11. Re:It's also reknowned for its fearsome battle cry by tpgp · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Developers, developers, developers!"

    if you don't know what he's talking about

    --
    My pics.