Slashdot Mirror


France to Allow Cell Phone Jamming

ZuperDee writes "According to this article, the French industry minister has approved a decision to allow cinemas, concert halls and theaters to install cell phone jammers, on the condition that emergency calls can still get through."

43 of 866 comments (clear)

  1. Emergency Calls? by SultanCemil · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How do they allow emergency calls through? Aren't most cell jammers simply frequency based white noise generators?

    --
    Cemil.
    1. Re:Emergency Calls? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think thats the icing on the cake.

      Being able to say "Yer sure" and not mean it all in the same breath.

      Those wanting to block calls sort of get their way, and those who don't want it blocking get to smile as well.

      I think this is the best all round decision.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Emergency Calls? by mmonkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm just guessing here, but maybe they could have an on-site picocell or something which the phones will associate with, and then control which calls the cell lets through? Just a thought.

    3. Re:Emergency Calls? by famebait · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, GSM jammers of this type work by impersonating the local base stations by responding before them, but not actually letting anything through.

      The systems have been available for a few years,
      and are apparently very good at blocking out only a well defined area. The stumbling blocks have been entirely legal/regulatory.

      I don't know if the available equipment handles it already, but there is no technical reason why the jammer couldn't engage slightly more thoroughly in the transaction and forward select calls.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    4. Re:Emergency Calls? by weighn · · Score: 5, Funny

      i'd say they would use a white-noise generator and have a member of staff monitor slashdot for emergencies at which point they turn off the white-noise.

      --
      Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
    5. Re:Emergency Calls? by leonmergen · · Score: 5, Informative
      No it's not. It's irritating when the same (kind of) people always leave their mobiles running, the hip, young, gadget people having their latest top40 tune as their ring tone... now really, when some kind of polyphonic f*cked up version of Usher or whatever starts blasting at way-too-loud volume through a room, or even a cinema, i'm irritated. I turn my mobile off so I won't disturb anyone, I expect the same from others.

      Is it really necessary to be reachable while you're at the cinema ? No. And if it is necessary, you shouldn't be at the cinema.

      --
      - Leon Mergen
      http://www.solatis.com
    6. Re:Emergency Calls? by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Informative

      The only thing that comes to mind is having a special node at the theatre thats essentially a repeater (but doesn't ring the phone or allow outgoing calls to be made). Calls to anyone with a phone from a certain prefix or list of numbers (given to any emergency responders) is allowed through. Think of it like a cell-phone firewall.

      If that's how they're planning on doing it I don't know. But there has to be some way of distinguishing emergency calls, or emergency cell phones from normal everyday calls/phones.

      --
      AccountKiller
    7. Re:Emergency Calls? by pklong · · Score: 5, Funny

      Your on to something, but you're not quite there.

      Allow the cinemas to install their own Pico Cells in the theatres and jam the outside cells. The pico cell should connect them to the cinema's own mobile operator and charge them 20$ per minute.

      They'll think twice next time they get their bill, inconsideratle little twerps ;)

      --

      Philip

      Signatures are broken

    8. Re:Emergency Calls? by Pieroxy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That is what I like about this new law. It doesn't force anyone to do anything. It does allow movie theaters to implement something, and the public will decide if they prefer going to a theater that allow cells or not.

      And while it might or might not irritate you in a movie theater, think about a real theater, a classical concert or any other public performance where live artists are playing.

      In any way, this will have a very democratic implementation: If people rush into these "early adopters" theaters that jam cells, more and more will adopt the system, and the mass will be pleased.

    9. Re:Emergency Calls? by senatorpjt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've had problems with this in the past. If I actually remember to turn my phone off when I enter a theatre, I forget to turn it back on when I leave. I've had fairly serious things happen, such as my friend trying to call me when his brother died because he needed help moving the body. I eventually just set my phone to beep once. What is slashdot's opinion on this? It's set to beep fairly loudly, but it's a quick, short beep. By the time you notice it, it's already over, so I don't think it's in the same league as a phone blaring "Hey Ya" for 45 seconds while someone searches for the button to make it stop.

      I'd like to see an option for a "quiet zone signal", which would be a small transmitter put in places like movie theatres, etc, and phones could be equipped with an option to go into silent mode when the signal is present. It would be dirt-cheap to implement from the theatre's end.. it could probably be done for less than $100. The only problem is that everyone would need a new phone. Of course, the way people go through phones these days, if they started implementing this now, most people would have it on their phones in a couple years.

      I really think that 99% of people that have their phones start ringing in a movie are embarrassed, and not just trying to piss everyone off - they just forgot to turn the phone off. This way, people could just have this setting enabled on their phone and not have to worry about it.

    10. Re:Emergency Calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      there were days without cell phones.. and parents went to the theatre anyway ....

    11. Re:Emergency Calls? by The+Limp+Devil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And while it might or might not irritate you in a movie theater, think about a real theater, a classical concert or any other public performance where live artists are playing.

      I can't even begin to tell you how frustrating it is to have my lectures interrupted by students' cell phones ringing. One student didn't even bother to turn off her cell phone during her oral exam, as we found out when it rang midway through the examination.

      I would certainly welcome a cell phone blocker in my class rooms.

    12. Re:Emergency Calls? by hyc · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's actually two factors at work here - digital cell phones attenuate their transmit power level based on the strength of the signal they receive. The theory is that if they are receiving a strong signal from a cell tower, they must be very near it physically, so they don't need to use as much power to transmit and be heard by the tower. So the first thing they do is set up a local base station; all the phones will lock in on it because it is the strongest signal around, and they will all reduce their transmit power because the local signal is so strong. So this automatically means your phone will only use the local base station, no other cell towers will be able to hear the weak signal your phones will be putting out.

      The region being affected is easily controlled using directional antennas. Most cell towers already use a 120 degree beam spread, so directional antennas are the usual already, but they can certainly use a narrower beam antenna if they want.

      As for routing emergency calls, again, the network tells the phone what the phone is allowed to do. No problem there...

      --
      -- *My* journal is more interesting than *yours*...
    13. Re:Emergency Calls? by CountBrass · · Score: 5, Informative

      Trivial. The same way that you handle calls in a large shopping mall or other localised concentration of people. You setup a micro-cell. The difference is the one in the cinema will only route emergency calls; the rest get a recorded message saying "fuck off you sad bastards: try watching the film." QED.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    14. Re:Emergency Calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      its easy to jam cell phone signals - they should just move all buildings to North Wales - I can never get a signal on my phone ;)

    15. Re:Emergency Calls? by MmmDee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yep, and in another reply here somewhere I mentioned that parents/business people/relatives left phone numbers with others as to where they'd be during the day and evening. It was common to have 4 or 5+ phone numbers on the refrigerator outlining the course of a night's outing (friend's house, restaurant, theater, nightclub). Each of these places knew that someone might call. On arriving to a friend's house, you'd say, "I left your number with the sitter, hope that's okay." Restaurants, theaters, and nightclubs had PA systems or wait-staff and ushers to ask among their patrons looking for recipients of emergency calls. Believe me, "emergencies" are not a creation of the new millennium or the now/me generation. They have been around awhile and people (especially parents) have always pre-arranged someway to be contacted.

      --
      No man's an island, unless he's had too much to drink and wets the bed.
    16. Re:Emergency Calls? by animaal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's the responsibility of a surgeon to remain contactable when on-call. This means not having the phone turned off, and not spending time in places where there is no reception (e.g. the cinema with a sign saying "no phone reception here").

      Of course, if the cinema doesn't have very obvious warnings, there could be trouble.

    17. Re:Emergency Calls? by jdreed1024 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It does allow movie theaters to implement something, and the public will decide if they prefer going to a theater that allow cells or not.

      They better damn well inform me in big letters on the back of my ticket that my cell phone is jammed. I've taken my phone into theaters (on vibrate), and I've had to leave in the middle of shows because I've gotten a call or SMS, but that's something I'm prepared to do, and plenty of people used to have pagers and also had to leave in the middle of the show, so it's nothing new.

      Why should I be penalized just because some retard either can't figure out how to turn his phone to vibrate or thinks everyone should hear Mozart's "Ode to the Piezoeletric Buzzer"?

      In fact, I'm confused. Everyone gets all up in arms when some big mean company tries to restrict 802.11b, or blocks local hotspots by installing their own for-pay system, or whatever, but when the *movie theaters* (I thought we hated big media and the MPAA?) start jamming cell phone tranmissions (which are more useful than 802.11b to the average user), it's suddenly a great idea? I don't get it.

      People with ringtones on in theaters is a social problem. Social problems cannot be solved by technical means. Even if you jam cellphones, they're still going to be talking loudly, or having some kid playing his gameboy, or crying, or throwing popcorn, or whatever. It won't solve anything. What they should do is take the money they were going to use for this, hire a couple of bouncers, and if your cell phone rings, you are asked to leave and you get your money back (or maybe a gift card, to prevent people from getting calls in the last frame of the movie and then getting money back), as per the back of your ticket. End of story.

      --
      There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    18. Re:Emergency Calls? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Still this only works when sombody calls the emergency number. However there could be someone in the cinema like a surgeon who needs to be able to receive emergency calls! Such a basestation would not recognize such calls.

      I suppose one solution to this would be to leave the phone with the cinema and the cinema provides a vibrate only pager. Only the pager would be able to receive a notification. When you're finished you exchange the pager for your cell phone. Those who need to be contacted would be willing to go the extra step.

      In a place like a theatre or concert hall you could either have the same solution or notify the hospital before you go in of the theatre's number and your seat number. That way they can contact the theatre and the staff would send someone to get you.

      The simplest solution would simply to not go out when you're on call. The only catch some people are on call so frequently that this would simply deprive them of a social life.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    19. Re:Emergency Calls? by golgotha007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      if that's the case, please rent your movies instead. Your conditions are obviously not satisfactory enough to attend a public showing of a film.

  2. Yes! by caitsith01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Eat it connectivity junkies! The rebellion has begun!

    Seriously though... who REALLY needs to be contacted IMMEDIATELY 24-7? I would suggest that if you are really that important, you might want to skip the movie and stay in the Oval Office doing your job.

    And if a friend or relative is dead or dying, well, if it takes until the end of the movie for you to find out, they'll be just as dead after as they were during. Plus you will have had an extra 2 hours of Matt Damon (or Gerard Depardieu?) induced happiness before the terrible news reaches you.

    Basically anything that reduces our addiction to instant satisfaction of our every wish is ok with me. We don't NEED to be hooked up to a communication network all the time. They should also install these things in:

    - university lecture theatres
    - conferences
    - crowded public transport
    - you could have one in your house to turn on during mealtimes and other gatherings to encourage actual social interaction with people who are physically present

    --
    Read Pynchon.
    1. Re:Yes! by quetzalc0atl · · Score: 5, Funny

      >Seriously though... who REALLY needs to be contacted IMMEDIATELY 24-7?

      superheroes

    2. Re:Yes! by caitsith01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I really think it's annoying that some people seem to have a problem blocking out things when they don't care to hear it.

      So basically you think we should all be like George W Bush? :P

      Explain to me how it's not ok for me to be annoyed by some dickwit talking on his phone in the middle of a quiet bit in a thriller that I have paid to see, but it IS ok for you to be annoyed at me for being annoyed?

      As for you and your child... well, that's what DVD players are for. Having children involves certain sacrifices, one of which is your ability to go out alone for a while. Either trust your baby sitter or rent a DVD, but don't let your stupid phone ring in my movie!

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    3. Re:Yes! by caitsith01 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The comment about someone dead or dying is absolutely stupid. If someone's been hit by a car and they're not dead yet, but will be soon, I'd rather like to go and say goodbye.

      Thank you, your comments are extremely stupid too.

      How did people manage as recently as 1990? When people were dead or dying, however did relatives get by not knowing the *instant* their loved ones were crushed by that tractor/mauled by that pit bull/swarmed by those killer bees? What about earlier, say 1900... without phones at all, you would have had to wait a shocking couple of hours for a telegram delivery guy to find you... or in the Old West, you might have had to wait weeks and weeks to hear news of a loved one's passing.

      But you can't wait 2 hours? 2 lousy hours. 120 minutes... 180 if it's an Oliver Stone film. Well, maybe you should sit at home crouched over your landline muttering "can't go out... loved ones might die... might miss the call... could all die at any second... can't miss their deaths...". Or maybe you could get out there and live your life without the need for the constant psychological umbilical cord of your mobile phone, taking the outrageous chance that if your entire family is slaughtered by cannibals while you are at the cinema the police will probably fill you in on the parts you missed when you get home.

      Better yet, why not kill your family now? That way you wont miss a precious second of it, and I can enjoy The Bourne Supremacy in peace.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    4. Re:Yes! by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Insightful


      And yes, some calls ARE that important. If I and my wife are out for dinner and a movie sans child, we're using our phones for emergency contact numbers.


      I'm sorry, but that's just a load of crap. Everyone is worried about there kid, but unless you're a doctor with ueber-specialized knowledge of your kids deadly medical condition I think others will be able to take care of any emergency better IN PERSON than you can over a cell phone perhaps 30-60 minutes away.

      I don't know if you know this.. but before cell phones people trusted their kids to babysitters and didn't sit on pins and needles worrying about little Johnny every single second (and thus needed cell phone contact for some emergency). Ok, some insane parents probbably still did, but cell phones have only seemingly broaded that insane impulse. I recall some episodes of crappy sit-coms making fun of such parents. Children can survive quite nicely for the length of dinner and a movie in the care of others. In the event of true emergencies some babysitters even know to call 911! Believe it or not there are better resources for emergencies than you on a phone (poison centers, 911 operators, and good babysitters).

      --
      AccountKiller
    5. Re:Yes! by Kombat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are cases where a babysitter may urgently need to contact the parent.

      There was a time, not so long ago, when cell phones didn't exist. And guess what? Parents still hired babysitters and went out for the occassional movie. The truly paranoid ones simply stayed home until their kid got a little older.

      What's wrong with suggesting parents of today do the same thing? As the GP said, having a child requires certain sacrifices. Suck it up and stop complaining, or don't have kids.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  3. You can by caitsith01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Contrary to other replies, you can actually do this. I imagine it's some sort of flag built into the GSM system that forces handsets not to function.

    The reason I know you can do it is that there is an area in the building I used to work where signals are intentionally blocked somehow, and my phone comes up with "Emergency Calls Only" when I am in that area.

    --
    Read Pynchon.
  4. I REALLY WONDER by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    how everybody was able to survive 10 years ago, when NOBODY had a cell phone in the cinema or on a concert...

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    1. Re:I REALLY WONDER by mikael · · Score: 4, Funny

      how everybody was able to survive 10 years ago, when NOBODY had a cell phone in the cinema or on a concert...

      Emergency service workers like doctors, anaesthetists and consultants had pagers. This device would allow simple text messages to be received (if not just a telephone number), and could be set to vibrate rather than play a polyphonic tune at 120 decibels.

      I think I may have seen one in a museum, but that was a long time ago...

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  5. How lame can you get? by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would personally be quite pissed that just to watch a movie, I would be out of touch for three hours. Not a good idea.

    And I would be quite pissed if you took a phone call while I was trying to watch the movie. Your attitude is so frigging self-important. If you cannot be out of touch for 3 hours while you watch a movie, stay at home!

    I swear, you see all of these posts that claim, "I must be reachable at all times", I call bullshit. You know what I hear when someone takes a call in a movie theater? I'll give you a hint, 100% of the time it is banal blather. Grow up.

    --
    A house divided against itself cannot stand.
  6. A great idea. by neuro.slug · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can tolerate a mobile phone going off in a movie theater, but I shall bring down fiery justice on those who leave their bloody phones on during a live performance. There has to be intervention when people don't have the decency to turn off their damned phones during a classical performance, an opera, or a play. It's not only rude to the audience, but it's also insulting to the performers.

    -- n

  7. What did people do *before* cellphones? by blorg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It wasn't that long ago, you know. Did parents never take a night off with a trusted babysitter at home? If you want to, you can call home yourself once or twice to check on things - just not in the middle of the movie!

    People who *really* need to be contacted (doctors on call, for example) had pagers; and a blocking system based on a mini-cell station could be configured to allow such urgent calls/text messages through.

    And you are quite wrong about the annoyance value of mobile phone conversations - a study has found them to be dramatically more annoying than face-to-face conversations, probably due to the one-way nature.

  8. Re:This idea sucks. by Mr_Silver · · Score: 4, Insightful
    In sum: this idea sucks and a better one could be had.

    A good point - but, you've completely forgotten a few things:

    1. Hardware manufacturers design products 1-2 years in advance. Therefore for the implementation of an RFID chip, you're looking at at least a year.
    2. A protocol would need to be devised that all the manufacturers agree on (both handsets and the systems that will trigger them)
    3. People would need to purchase these phones. Typically they'd be on high tier phones first. A phones lifetime is approximately 18 months before they are on low tier (ie. your pay-as-you-go mass market) where adopotion is the greatest.
    4. You'd need all the phones to adopt this before it would work. The first WAP phone I saw was in 1996 (and i'm pretty sure that they were around before then) and only now is it commonplace enough for companies to sell content through it. That is a lead time of 8 years.
    So in short, it's a great idea, but you're looking at 8 years+ before its going to be installed on enough handsets to actually work in the cinema. What is the point of blocking 20% of the handsets, when its one of the other 80% that ring?

    Alternativily you could implement signal blocking today which will work on every phone the moment it is turned on.

    Sometimes the best ideas aren't the most practical to implement.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  9. Re:First Post? by BasilBrush · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Yeah right. Selfish bastards like you always blame it on others. Not one person in a theatre taking calls, making SMSs, talking to their friends, or disturbing people by their coming and going thinks they are wrong.

    It's not the people blaming you for being anti-social that are idiots.

    Switch your phone off in the theatre. If you think you are too necessary to someone elses life to be uncontactable for the length of a movie, get a DVD player and stay at home.

  10. Re:First Post? by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Funny
    And besides, people are getting far too anal about things these days. It's just a fucking movie.

    If it's just a fucking movie, then don't fucking go. It's not place to decide how important an event is to the other people there. I've just visited your blog.

    A) You look very young, which probably explains your selfish anti-social attitute.

    B) You go on about some concert as if it was the second coming of Christ. Don't you realise it's just a fucking concert?

  11. Here in Denmark ... by zonix · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In (most) Danish cinemas, just after the trailers and before the movie starts, there's a little funny reminder for people who forgot to turn off or silence their mobiles. It's actually a commercial - a joint effort by various mobile phone service providers.

    The lights are dimmed and the screen is completely black. Suddenly a phone rings in some corner of the cinema, only it's not a phone, it's actually coming from the surround sound speakers. One of the commercials has one of those annoyoing teenage girls answering the phone - you know, the kind who is blabbering on and on about everything with one of her friends. :-)

    It's very humerous and convincing at the same time. Of course in the end the reminder on the screen tells you to turn of the phone.

    IMO, this is great way to handle the issue.

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
  12. Can I take these jammers with me on a date? by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Here's something you won't read too often on /.

    #1 pet-peve on a date, just short of picking your nose, is picking up a cell phone.

    I take my phone with me, and it goes OFF the second I am within talking distance of my date. If it goes back on again, that means I'm more concerned about a random friend asking me (for the 50th time) what sites are best for downloading mp3s, than I am in the flow of our conversation.

    Is there anything more uncomfortable than to be mid-stride in conversation, and having that blasted ring interupt. So now she's giving driving directions to a friend and your picking at your food. (or your nose, as at this point it's a lost cause)

    So help me, if that phone rings it better be your family priest/rabbi/immam telling you that your mother/brother/father/sister/dog is dieing.

    Now that I think about it, I don't want a portable jammer with me on a date. I want to know as soon as possible that the womman is a classless waste of my time.

    Here's a better idea though. Let's install electroshock devices on cell phones, that are like that video game James Bond (Sean Connery) played in "Never Say Never Again". When you start talking it's all good, but as time passes the voltage/pain goes up. If the conversation isn't worth having you hang up before you have to feel the pain of everyone else sitting near you.

  13. Hmm... by Pakaran2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you jam cell phones, won't that just lead to people shouting louder? Knowing most of the cell phone users I do, I can just picture...

    (Phone goes off) "Hello? ... Oh, hi, John, they have a cell phone jammer in here. JOHN, I SAID THEY HAVE A CELL PHONE JAMMER IN HERE. CAN YOU HEAR ME BETTER NOW? ... DAMMIT JOHN, EVERYONE IN THE THEATER IS STARING AT ME. ... YEAH, I'D LOVE TO MEET YOU FOR A BEER, BUT I'M IN THIS MOVIE FOR THE NEXT HALF HOUR. Oh, never mind, they just dragged me out by my shirt collar. ... Yeah, there's much better reception out here, where do you want to go?"

  14. Re: So dumb, when we resort to technology by gidds · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Exactly. If the problem is inconsiderate and antisocial behaviour, then fight inconsiderate and antisocial behaviour!

    This is exactly comparable to the current fuss about P2P software. Mobile phones have perfectly legitimate and non-infringing uses. (SMS messages, for example. Genuine life-or-death emergencies. Incoming calls where the user doesn't speak, or leaves the cinema before speaking.) Jamming prevents all those, whilst still allowing all the antisocial behaviour people have the rudeness to pull off!

    A jammer is just a tool for management too cowardly to enforce a proper nuisance policy.

    And of course, this is the thin end of the wedge. If jammers become accepted in cinemas, theatres and churches, they may well spread to restaurants, galleries, museums, shops, cafés, pubs, stations, workplaces...

    What's worse is that in this case there is a possible technological measure that would do pretty much what people want. Instead of jamming the phones, how about a short-range transmitter which told the phones to go into 'silent mode', turning off the ringtone, and maybe the microphone, whilst still allowing vibrating alerts, text messages, and maybe incoming calls. It's a bit more technology than phones currently have, but it can't be too hard to implement.

    --

    Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

  15. Performer's perspective by kottos · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think that this is great. I'm a classically trained musician and a sound engineer so I spend a lot of time either performing or recording concerts. When I'm onstage, I'm already a bundle of nerves and have to concentrate like hell for fear of messing up. Whenever I hear a phone go off, it is very distracting. I can ignore it and carry on, but it does throw you for a moment. 99% of the time it won't result in any audible wobble, but if it happens at the wrong time it can throw you completely and you screw up bigtime. When I'm recording, it is even worse. Even if somebody has their phone on silent but are sitting close enough to some of the gear, you can get the lovely du-du-du-du, du-du-du-du, du-du-du-du-duuuuuuuuuu sound captured in your recording. Again, this happens very rarely, but when it does I have to be physically restrained... I also lecture at a university - whenever students use their phone in class, it shows a distinct lack of respect for me and for the other students, some of whom are finding it difficult enough to follow the course content as it is.

  16. Where R the +27 "Funny" Mods When U Need 'em? by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 5, Funny

    The funniest thing I have read today -- and probably for the week -- was you putting "technicians at your small hosting company" in the same sentence as "doctors, fire fighters, [and] people waiting for an organ transplant." It is, as they say in The Biz, "comedy gold."

    (I have this image of weary, grim-faced grimey first-responders -- the firefighter in helmet, with his axe; the policeman, in cap, with his gun drawn; the doctor, stethescope around his neck, medical kit in hand; all emerging slo-mo through a thick curtain of smoke that blankets a rain-slick urban landscape. Background sound effects include sirens wailing, women sobbing, a toddler crying out for her mommy, the crackle of a police radio, maybe even the chum-chum of helicopter rotors overhead. Soundtrack is something suitably somber, like Enya's "Only Time," or perhaps a solo bagpipe rendition of "Amazing Grace." Suddenly, a high-pitched cry cuts through the scene and the mood: "Hey Guys!! Wait Up!!" The battle-weary first-responders turn slowly to see a technician from a small hosting company, "Buckaroo Banzai" baseball cap on head, router under his arm, racing out of an otherwise abandoned movie theatre (Marquee: "Star Wars Marathon!") to join them. The emergency-response professionals then look on in helpless horror (and a smidge of amusement that will haunt their consciences for months to come) as an Armored Personnel Carrier loaded with a troop of National Guardsmen barrels around the corner and flattens the hapless tech into the damp asphalt.)

    Yeah, sure, I got better things to do then give it away on /., but you inspired me, dude, and for that I thank you.

  17. Re:Emergency Calls? -- True Friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Did anyone else pause while reading this?
    I've had fairly serious things happen, such as my friend trying to call me when his brother died because he needed help moving the body.

    Do you live in New Jersey? Oh well, you know what they say "A friend will help you move. A true friend will help you move a body."
  18. Re:I for one really welcome this. by pla · · Score: 4, Funny

    I propose a low-tech solution. Warn people that they will be trown out if their mobile rings. Enforce.

    I've gone to a number of live performances that do something very much like this...

    I've heard a number of variations, and seen them carried out about half the time (just the threat helps remind people to act civilized and turn the damned things off)... My favorite (at a play), the entire cast just stopped in mid-sentence, all turned toward the idiot with the ringing phone, and the main actor on stage asked him to answer it, insisting over rude-boy's mumbled apologies, that he please go ahead, take his call, all the rest of us would wait politely.

    I have never seen another human turn that shade of red.

    Most importantly, about six seconds later (you could almost hear the cogs turning in peoples' heads), a wave of soft little clicks and low bleeps moved across the theatre as all the other potential rude-idiots-that-ignored-the-initial-warning turned off their phones. Truly beautiful.

    Who needs technology when plain ol' public humiliation will work? Unfortunately, most for-pay venues don't have the balls to carry through on threats like that.