Slashdot Mirror


To Mars and Back in Ninety Days

paltemalte writes "A new means of propelling spacecraft being developed at the University of Washington could dramatically cut the time needed for astronauts to travel to and from Mars and could make humans a permanent fixture in space. In fact, with magnetized-beam plasma propulsion, or mag-beam, quick trips to distant parts of the solar system could become routine, said Robert Winglee, a UW Earth and space sciences professor who is leading the project."

8 of 812 comments (clear)

  1. This is fine and well, but... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is fine and well, but how does one meanwhile solves the most pressing problem, that is, providing CHEAP and RELIABLE means to get into earth orbit???

    1. Re:This is fine and well, but... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Point taken. However, dropping the amount of fuel you have to hoist into orbit can only help.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:This is fine and well, but... by DerWulf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      you just don't get it. NASA doesn't even fart for 20mio$ much less get up 100kms. Small, baby steps procedure coupled with the profit and loss test of private enterprise will get us into orbit, cheaply, one day, if there is sufficient demand for it. Steady wins the race.

      --

      ___
      No power in the 'verse can stop me
  2. Sign me up... by Kick+the+Donkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sign me up, should this ever become a reality. However, the only way space travel will become an everyday occrance is if it is profitable. Don't get me wrong. I'd love to do it for the sake of doing it. But people aren't willing to spend millions/billions/trillions of dollars to do something just because "its there".

    --
    /. is a bunch of nerds at a million typewriters. It's not a political conspiracy determined to undermine your beliefs.
  3. New Method? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's all this about a "new method" being required for short trips to Mars? What about the 101 old methods we have? Nuclear Thermal, Nuclear Electric, Orion, Laser Lifters, Nuclear Salt Water (this seriously needs to be developed!), Fission Fragment engines, Nuclear Steam ships, etc, etc, etc.

    We've got high powered propulsion options pouring out of our ears. It all comes down to getting funding. Wave a plan near congress and they're sure to kill it before breakfast.

  4. There is, of course, a major problem here... by Xaroth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article mentions having one station here and another on the other side, so that the craft itself need not carry its own propulsion.

    However, any sort of malfunction - from the braking side not firing at the right time, to the braking side getting knocked off angle by a micrometeorite at the wrong moment, to the craft itself getting pushed off course - would mean that the craft itself would go hurtling through space with no real chance to be rescued.

    The way around this? Keep an on-board propulsion system that's able to slow it down from full-speed back to 0, and then speed it up enough to get back to where you were going originally in a reasonable amount of time.

    Which kind of defeats the purpose of the entire method.

  5. Second Law by Wessler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can anyone tell me how the "pusher" satellite in the picture is supposed to work? I see one beam of energy with enough force to accelerate a spacecraft with a lot of force. Either there's an invisible other beam balancing this out, scorching the Earth underneath, or the satellite is doing a much better job of propelling itself out of the solar system than it is pushing the distant spacecraft where it's supposed to go. Or has someone figured out how to suspend Newton's second law?

  6. Re:For every action... by Plural+of+Mongoose · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since the plasma is basically 'free' once the station is operational, merely direct an equal amount of plasma in the oppposite plane to the direction required for propulsion - the station would remain motionless, relatively. Mind you, I'd be carefull approaching the back door...

    --
    The last fucking thing you want is my undivided attention...