Slashdot Mirror


Rubik's Famous Magic Cube in Lego Form

addaon writes "I just came across a successful attempt to construct a Rubik's cube entirely out of Lego. It's an interesting companion to the Lego Rubik's solver featured some time ago."

85 comments

  1. Besides removing the labels... by thedogcow · · Score: 3, Funny

    Great, now I have to paint each individual lego.

    --
    Yes! I listen to NYC Speedcore and do math at 3AM. I suggest you try it too.
    1. Re:Besides removing the labels... by Rand+Huck · · Score: 3, Funny

      I wonder what's more difficult, solving the puzzle or figuring this construction out? I think after finally constructing it, I've spent the last of my sanity... which defeats the purpose of the Rubiks cube in the first place.

  2. Thanks a lot by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now when I have almost finished with my old (simplified) Rubik's cube after years of frustration, now I will have a new thing to "play" with. Thanks a lot!

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  3. solution by Heem · · Score: 1

    I bet it would be really easy to solve...

    --
    Don't Tread on Me
    1. Re:solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, just use some good old H2SO4..

  4. Massive by themoodykid · · Score: 5, Informative

    The thing weighs 3kg! Maybe you could build up your wrist muscles while solving this thing.

    1. Re:Massive by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Methinks there are some other problems slashdotters are more likely to solve which also build up your wrist muscles.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Massive by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not to worry, if the thing doesn't work as a Rubik's cube, the builder can always stick this Lego creation next to it and reenact Picard vs the Borg.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    3. Re:Massive by DrewCapu · · Score: 2, Funny
      Maybe you could build up your wrist muscles while solving this thing.
      You must be new here. It's common knowledge that just about every /.'er has at least one wrist that gets plenty of exercise already.
  5. I think I have enough colors! by multi-flavor-geek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Oh, I know I have nough, white, yellow, red, grey, black, blue, that's a lego rubicks cube waiting to happen!
    And this would be more entertaining then just trying to build riduiculasly tall freestanding towers (my records have been limited by ceiling height) or ridiculasly long suspention bridges (using legos as cables and all)
    My record on that one was a 9 foot span that held a couple of pounds!
    Of course it would not be as entertaining as building the lego airplanes as smashing them into my bedroom walls to se where all of the passengers ended up in my room!

    --
    Like arts? Like cheesy little Indie mags? Check out www.artwerkmag.com, and don't laugh at the bad coding please.
  6. Cool by nounderscores · · Score: 4, Funny

    Next, we need to create The Cube out of lego and abduct people to put into it.

    1. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But could you create a Time Cube out of Lego?

  7. Re:Now solve it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please ignore my previous post.. I didn't realize I was replying to Ford Prefect

    Please don't leave me behind when the Vogons come!!

  8. Your sig [way OT] by skadus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What does it mean? I've managed to figure out a couple words individually, and obviously it's a play on 'cogito, ergo sum', but when I try to put it together I can't make any sense of it (possibly because I don't know Latin).

    'Man is and thinks therefore smells profanely vulgar and desire'?

    1. Re:Your sig [way OT] by svyyn · · Score: 1

      "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."

      "I am human and think, therefore I hated the comman rabble and pleasure."

      progranum vulgus could also be translated as 'wicked masses'.

      Regardless, it doesn't seem to make a great deal of sense.

    2. Re:Your sig [way OT] by skadus · · Score: 0

      Ah. Yeah, kinda makes sense now. 'Me am smarte, so me hates dumb peoples.'

      On a side note (to no-one in particular), maybe it's just that I'm new here, but why am I getting modded down to zero for a comment I clearly marked as Offtopic? It's not like I show up in the default view, since I'm nested. I actually marked it OT so I *wouldn't* get modded down.

      I suppose it only makes sense that my first post to get modded gets modded down for something stupid. Oh, well.

    3. Re:Your sig [way OT] by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

      The thing is, marked or not, the ones reading in plain or threaded view are going to read it.

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
  9. Scramble it... by mstefanus · · Score: 1

    Scramble it in anyway you want!

    I can solve it under a minute.

    1. Re:Scramble it... by satanicat · · Score: 4, Funny

      by picking the the colored plates off it and placing them on in order?? =)

      --
      How Now Brown Cow
    2. Re:Scramble it... by Usquebaugh · · Score: 2, Funny

      OK,

      half of it is in London, the other half in San francisco.

  10. All that work for nothing by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    They didn't need to go to such lengths just to have a Rubik's cube that can be dismantled and rearranged when nobody is looking, the original thing had stickers that were easily peeled off and reglued to solve the cube.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:All that work for nothing by Chris_Jefferson · · Score: 2, Informative

      What is more fun is to just swap a few stickers, then give it to someone who claims they can solve the cube. Usually if you swap a few stickers you'll make a new unsolvable problem (it isn't possible to get from any cube to the solution ^_^ )

      --
      Combination - fun iPhone puzzling
    2. Re:All that work for nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Why would you peel off the stickers when you can take it apart and rearrange it?

    3. Re:All that work for nothing by benhocking · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The simplest unsolvable swap is to swap the stickers from both sides of an edge piece. Then, simply twist it a few dozen times to mask it.

      However, if the solver is as gifted as he thinks it is, he'll probably get it to a similar configuration fairly quickly at which point he should be able to confidently proclaim that it cannot be solved. (Those who are experts in the cube, which I definitely am not, should also be familiar with its parity states.)

      --
      Ben Hocking
      Need a professional organizer?
    4. Re:All that work for nothing by Q2Serpent · · Score: 1

      Actually, switching any two stickers (that aren't the same color) will make a cube unsolvable. You need to switch at least three to have a chance at getting to a solvable state.

    5. Re:All that work for nothing by serbanp · · Score: 1

      The thing is, if you know how to solve the cube (I bet millions know how to), you can get to the point where the cube is solved with the exception of the misplaced stickers.

      At that moment, you can point out that the cube was altered.

      A side question to Rubik's cube lovers: where can one buy a quality one? I have an original cube (made in Hungary) and recently wanted to buy a new one (the sticker corners of the original have worn out). Every single cube I could find was made in China and is absolute crap. The original was made from a plastic that had the right amount of friction and feels very good when rotating the rows (some sort of tactile feedback through the plastic squeaking). The new ones use ordinary plastic and feel bad (I don't think they can be improved by changing the spring pressure or oiling them). So, does anyone make quality cubes these days?

      Serban

  11. turnable? by slimak · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm failing to see how this thing can turn about all three axis -- the pictures only show it being rotated about the horizontal axis, what about the other two planes? The fact that it is build using the circle on the inside seems to me that it would only be able to turn about one axis rather than 3.

    1. Re:turnable? by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you read the article more carefully, you see that the designer went to great lengths to make the design completely symmetrical, (for example figuring out how many bricks thickness are needed to make cubical parts and such like) so if it can rotate one side, it can rotate all of them; just like the original Rubik's cube.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  12. Successful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    He hasn't created a working Rubix cube. The gigantic monstrosity which requires belts on every movement layer to prevent it falling apart is not a working Rubix cube. At best, and the site openly admits this, it is a model or a prototype.

    1. Re:Successful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw don't be so negative. It WORKS, it just doesn't work very WELL.

    2. Re:Successful? by BetterThanCaesar · · Score: 1

      I have to admit, this is really interesting. I now feel I have to top him by actually building a cube that works seamlessly :-)

      --
      "Stop failing the Turing test!" -- Dilbert
    3. Re:Successful? by mod_critical · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's SUPPOSED to be like that! Can't you see that this is an open expression of the Microsoft Server platform??? It is built with fixed, proprietary parts that, while they connect well to each other, cause the final product to only operates in one out of the three ways you'd expect it to, require external help to keep it from falling apart, and weigh much more than and be much larger than what would actually work! Geeze go take an art appreciation class.



      sorry, I couldn't help it =$

  13. Solving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I usually solve rubix cubes by just relocating all the color stickers. With this invention, I can just do it by taking the cube apart and putting it back together without the hassle of peeling stickers! ...now where did I put that blue 2x4 Lego piece...

    1. Re:Solving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could dismantle the original cube. Just rotate two faces a bit so that it is nolonger possible to rotate in a perpendicular motion. If you try forcing it in a perpendicular motion anyway, the small cubes will all fall leaving only the axis and the center of each face mounted. After that you can mount them all back, way easier and funnier than relocating stickers.

    2. Re:Solving by f00zy · · Score: 1

      If you had one, you took it apart and put vasoline on the moving parts. Moving stickers seems pretty primitive.

  14. Gilligan by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    If the professor of Gilligan's Island had legos, he could have built that nuclear reactor in 1 day instead of the 3 it required with coconuts.

    1. Re:Gilligan by acvh · · Score: 2, Funny

      it's not often that I get a glimpse of the future, but I just had one.... hundreds and hundreds of "Gilligan/professor/coconut" posts on Slashdot.

      (or have I been missing something all along?)

    2. Re:Gilligan by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

      maybe.... but the dumb shit still wouldnt be able to patch a 3 foot hole

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  15. Hmmm.... by comwiz56 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I bet this would be a little easy to snap the colored bricks off and put them in the right spot... cheaters delight

  16. Now a Rubick's cube for military! by WetCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just use only green lego blocks for it!

    1. Re:Now a Rubick's cube for military! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol thats funny!! just like this joke:

      how many lame comments does it take before people stop posting them!?

      if you're gonna post something, make it something usefull, funny, or intelligent, for the love of God

  17. simplified? by temojen · · Score: 1

    I believe the ones where all the faces were the same colour were marketed as "stupid cube" here.

  18. Easy to Solve, at least by VonGuard · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Just pop off the flats and rearrange...

    Should take about 10 minutes, which is about the time it takes me to become frustrated with the real thing and chuck it across the room.

    --
    Don't Crease the Weasel!
  19. Rubic's Boob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I took all the stickers of the original, easily solved.

  20. Adult (fan of) LEGO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The author of the article calls himself an "adult fan of LEGO". Well, I'm a fan of adult LEGO!

    1. Re:Adult (fan of) LEGO by rts008 · · Score: 1

      I JUST HAVE to stop telling myself "yeah, I've seen it all now"! LOL! It just goes to show ya that if you can't find it on the internet, it probably can't be found at all.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  21. Ye gods. by Fortran+IV · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just when I think the nerd community cannot surprise me any more, along comes something like this article. Not only is there a CAD system for building with LEGO, there are enough of them to justify a common graphic interface for them. Jeez Louise.

    Perhaps the universe has a reason for giving us such lousy social skills. If we ever really worked together, turned all that creativity and ingenuity to a single purpose, we'd have already built the Earth Mark II by now (probably from LEGO), and uncovered the Ultimate Question: How many licks does it take to get to the Tootsie Roll center of a Tootsie Pop?
    --
    I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
    1. Re:Ye gods. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many licks does it take to get to the Tootsie Roll center of a Tootsie Pop?

      See here

    2. Re:Ye gods. by DrewCapu · · Score: 1
      Ultimate Question: How many licks does it take to get to the Tootsie Roll center of a Tootsie Pop?
      Um, 42? Wait, that's not how I remembered it. Nice try, but I don't think you have the Ultimate Question.
    3. Re:Ye gods. by zecg · · Score: 1

      Just when I think the nerd community cannot surprise me any more, along comes something like this article. Not only is there a CAD system for building with LEGO, there are enough of them to justify a common graphic interface for them. Jeez Louise.

      Reminds me of that program those guys were building in Douglas Coupland's "Microserfs".

      --
      .i lu doi ringos.star. xu do puku'aroroi dunli dopecaku leni virnu li'u
    4. Re:Ye gods. by Fortran+IV · · Score: 1

      Okay, I know earthly research has put the answer somewhere from 144 to 411 (thanks, AC), but they do not allow for just how long a tongue Eccentrica Gallumbits brings to each lick. (The issue of multiple tongues may be ignored, totalling the licks by each individual tongue.)

      --
      I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
    5. Re:Ye gods. by memco · · Score: 1

      I think they should refine that as well as a few other measurements, and I think we could actually anser the question sufficiently. We simply need to define the length of time the lick takes, the amount of surface area the lick covers, and how much saliva is applied durring each lick. Anyone want to rigidly define a lick? Anyone care a lick?

      --
      Get me a meat pie floater!
  22. Slightly less enormous lego cube by jerkface · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I know a guy who did a slightly smaller cube based on a different design. His page includes a short video showing the cube in operation.

    More uniquely, the same guy also has what is probably the world's only complete page on lego logic circuits.

    1. Re:Slightly less enormous lego cube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That cube kicks the other one's ass. much better design !

  23. Another Cube Solving Robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an aside, we built a robot that images and solves cubes here at the university of our own. It is rather crude looking but we have video to prove it works.

    http://osutodd23.tripod.com/Rubiks/RCSR.jpg

    -osutodd23@yahoo.com

    1. Re:Another Cube Solving Robot by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

      It is rather crude looking but we have video to prove it works.

      From the comment "Slightly less enormous lego cube":

      His page includes a short video showing the cube in operation.

      I have little doubt these videos are real, but statements such as "have a video of it" remind me of those videos from that alleged robot allegedly made from a Cooper Mini automobile.

      --
      Tag lost or not installed.
  24. A few words about the Rubic cube... by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "A famous recent puzzle is Rubik's cube invented by the Hungarian Ern Rubik. Invented in 1974,patented in 1975 it was put on the market in Hungary in 1977. It did not really begin it's infamous popularity until 1981. By 1982 10 million cubes had been sold in Hungary, more than the population of the country. It is estimated that 100 million were sold world-wide."

    That is for the facts, otherwise from the brain twisting solution, there is another way to solve it, as few noted before, to strip all the cover from the cube, making it entirely black, which is a valid solution according the rules of the game.

    Oh boy its one of the rare moments im proud to be a hungarian, when there is a discussion about hungarian inventions, that is...

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  25. TimeCube by nounderscores · · Score: 1

    I don't know. I've been educated, so I'm pretty one cornered. Maybe a more four cornered person could do it.

  26. Not perfect yet... by Liquid+Len · · Score: 1
    From TFA:
    • The axes in the centre are not strong enough to hold everything together: gaps appear, big enough for corner- and middle- pieces to drop.
    • Partial solution: strapping belts makes the cube much easier to handle
    That's a partial solution all right. All in all, I thing this looks like a fun hack, but it might need some more polishing...
  27. P.S. by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Just because you're butt-hurt because you can't get a date and you're at home putting the proof to my statement tonight doesn't mean you should mod my above post "Overrated". This one is offtopic, go ahead and mod it down. Then, please go read the moderation faq, especially the part that tells you to concentrate on positive moderation.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  28. Another cool lego design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Theres is a mechanical automatic transmission made of lego that is pretty clever too. It is the only one I've ever seen that doesnt use the mindstorm controller to shift up and down. It just uses springs. It make make the base of a good Sumo Bot for next year's contest.

  29. I once SABOTAGED one .... ieuw! by Barryke · · Score: 1

    (when i was a 12 years old) My previous neighbur could solve one in (almost) a blink. He was fond of the game. Whenever I was over at theirs place, i'd try it every time but never ever got it just right. So i dicided to relocate some color labels, once i found out how to click them loose. It wasnt easy. But i didn't finisch the job, i had to go suddenly. After that, it was unsolvable, and he didnt realize. He went crazy whenever he was playing with it.

    --
    Hivemind harvest in progress..
  30. Try it 4D by dark-br · · Score: 3, Informative


    While the physical cube can currently not be built, you can solve it through the portal of your computer screen. Try it: Magic Cube 4D

  31. sorry HTML was set - readable version here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sorry it had HTML set here is the readable version..

    (when i was a 12 years old)
    My previous neighbur could solve his one in (almost) a blink.
    He was quite fond of the game.

    Whenever I was over at theirs place, i'd try it
    every time but never ever got it just right.

    So i dicided to relocate some color labels, once
    i found out how to click them loose. It wasnt easy.
    But i didn't finisch the job, i had to go suddenly.

    After that, it was unsolvable, and he didnt realize.

    He went crazy whenever he was playing with it.

  32. Same guy, smaller cube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know why the submitter posted with that link, when the guy just finished this:
    http://users.skynet.be/maarten.steurbaut/Ru bik_Cub e_Small.htm

    much more compact and friendly. you can even hold it in one hand!

  33. Re:That's neat! by Mazem · · Score: 1

    Redundant? That isnt redundant (at least that ive seen in this thread), its awesome. Someone made a lego device that solves a rubiks cube.

  34. Re:That's neat! by Mazem · · Score: 1

    Oh god now i feel like a complete idiot.

  35. Dogic by blogan · · Score: 1

    If any of you are interested in Rubik's, you may be interested in buying a Dogic. It's a 20-sided puzzles that's going to be re-released by Meffert's if they get enough pre-orders.

    See http://sites.webec.com.hk/meffert/index.cfm?id&fus eaction=browse&pageid=108 for more information.

  36. That's nothing, check out THIS Lego item by antispam_ben · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.henrylim.org/Harpsichord.html
    Yes, it's what the html filename says it is. Some of the pics appear to have jaggies from aliasing, but a closer look shows they are actual Lego blocks.

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
  37. Lost Legos by unangst · · Score: 1

    The majority of *my* Legos never made past the following: The void under the couch cushions, family dog (think chewed or untouchable...), vacuum, the day I took a few Legos outside, that heating vent in my bedroom, road trip to the east coast, your younger brother, superglue, hacksaw, driveway gravel, and "lending them to a friend."

  38. Related: "The Tinkertoy Computer" by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

    One more comment for anyone still reading the comments to this article, this book by A. K. Dewdney (one of several who wrote the recreational column that replaced Martin Gardner's "Mathematical Games" in Scientific American, ISTR it was "Computer Recreations" when Dewdney wrote it) may be of interest, the full title of the book is "The Tinkertoy Computer and Other Machinations." This book appears to be out of print, but many used copies are available from used/out-of-print sellers on http://amazon.com/ and through the book metasearch engine http://www.bookfinder.com/.

    Also, I'm endeavoring to write shorter sentences than the first on in this comment.

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.