Yahoo Shuts Down Their PayPal Competitor
LostCluster writes "MSNBC and ZDnet are both reporting that Yahoo and HSBC have announced a shutdown plan for their PayDirect service which was their rival to PayPal. Since CitiBank abandoned their c2it service last year, PayPal now seems to be a monopoly by default." There are other players in this field, though, like bidpay and worldpay.
A consortium of Canadian banks (BMO, CIBC, RBC, ScotiaBank, and TD) offer "email money transfers" through CertaPay. My wife and I use it for almost everything we used to do through PayPal because -- unlike PayPal -- it's free for both the sender and receiver (as long as you have a banking plan that gives you a number of free transactions per month).
How appropriate. You fight like a cow.
Paypal is a hell of lot faster and easier than using credit cards. Also, as someone who sells things on eBay on a regular basis, it allows me to accept payments both from paypal people and from people with credit cards, which I wouldn't have otherwise been able to do. Also, I can dump money directly from paypal into my bank account, which I cannot do with my credit card.
So there you go.
--
RumorsDaily
Worldpay is not really a competitor to the main paypal market, since iirc it costs GBP100ish (USD 180) a significant amount (to an average part time ebay seller) to set up, plus an annual yearly fee, plus they take so much per transaction. Nochex is a competitor, but it was limited to UK customers only last time I checked it out.
No matter what I do I can't even figure out from the context what it's supposed to mean. I can't think of any words that it might be a typo of either.
Perhaps he was thinking of reneged?
The dollar is not a profit-maximizing corporation.
What next? Water has monopoly over showering substance?
If you only buy from people that take credit card payments directly, you'll end up paying for that privilege.
> I have no doubt that it is advantageous to you as a vendor, but I utterly fail
> to see the advantage to me as a buyer
I guess the main problem is, when set up correctly, you do not need a paypal account as a buyer to do business with someone using paypal on the vendor side.
So the advantage to you is that you refuse to do business with the vendor unless they accept your credit card, and paypal allows them to accept your credit card.
Additionally, all the disadvantages you claim are bogus.
> With credit cards the burden of proof is on the vendor. With PayPal the burden
> of proof is on the purchaser.
Seeing as you as the buyer are using your -credit card- in both situations, there is no difference what so ever.
You can have your credit card company issue a charge back aginst ANYONE you use your credit card with, the actual merchant being used, visa or mastercard directly, one of the millions of other merchants/banks, or paypal. That doesnt matter, because your credit card company simply sees a purchase, and can void that purchase just the same.
Being no different than with a credit card (because thats exactly what you are using to make the purchase) i fail to see how you think the burden is now on the purchaser...
In addition, there is http://www.moneybookers.com/ that also allows online money transfer and is based in UK and supports more countries than PayPal
What sucks is that both services want you to have a user ID before using them.
There is also Western Union that does online transfers but it is only for USA I think and their charges are high IMO.
This is one of those words that we could easily remove from the lexicon if we could get over the absolutist position that ALL free speech is a good thing.
It is interesting how some words for some reason have a negative connotation attached to them, while others, although with the same meaning, do not. For example, the "N"-word has its roots in the word "negro" - the Spanish word for "black". I personally believe that "black" is a pefectly acceptable, descriptive word, just as "white" is. But once a word has a negative context associated with it, it becomes forever unsavory, despite the benign etymology of the word.
Free Flat Screen HERE!
The listed alternatives aren't. They take somewhere between 100 and 300 Euros/$ in setup fees, which means you've gotta shell that out before you can make any transactions.
For a small site taking donations, that kills the option right there.
The only real alternative I found to paypal is Moneybookers.
Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
PayPal isn't the only service on the block. Nor is it the first.
Just use Kagi.com
I don't know how big or reliable they are, but there is always Storm Pay.
"Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"
Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
actually it seems the e-gold creators have already thought of this possiblity and provided for it in their User Agreement:
...
...
4.8. The Fusion Codicil
Issuer reserves the right to stop issuing additional e-gold by ceasing to accept bailment of additional bullion. This extraordinary provision will be triggered only in the event that lower cost or more efficient physical methods of extraction or transmuting the metals that comprise the reserves of the e-gold system result in subsequent non-scarcity of those elements.
I think you meant e-gold. The name without the hyphen goes to some other site that (currently) redirects to the real e-gold site with a referral code attached to the URL.
This recent post at Politech seems to be on the subject. It has a few alternatives and explains the pros and cons of some of them.
Leonid Mamtchenkov
Gah, idiot mods. I was supporting the argument of the grandparent poster. When a single company succeeds quickly and with very little competition, it is more difficult for someone else to break in and compete. This was true with Netscape. They had the market cornered, and the only way MS could hope to stand a chance was to give away for free what Netscape was charging for. Now 75% of Internet users choose IE.
--I swear, anything thing that even comes close to sounding unpopular on Slashdot is rapidly squelched. Keep an open mind and learn to fucking read.
Paypal no longer requires customers to have a Paypal account in order to make a purchase.
This means you can pay with your visa/mastercard to a seller that only offers Paypal.
I buy from some sellers who sell goods exclusively via Paypal all the time.
But when I do this, I simply use my visa/mastercard ***INSTEAD OF CASH*** from my Paypal account--so Paypal acts as a merchant account to the seller.
This way, if Paypal doesn't resolve any problems to my satisfaction, I can do a visa/mastercard chargepack with my credit card company.
As a buyer, this provides me with 2 layers of defense against fraud. Paypal chargeback and visa/mastercard chargeback.
Again, use your credit card when making purchases via Paypal instead of cash from your account.