Slashdot Mirror


Escaping WiFi Interference In The Modern Dorm Room?

j.cherney writes "I recently moved my son up to a dorm at Michigan State University. We set up a wireless router (D-link) and everything worked well-until the rest of the dorm moved in. Now he is getting intermittent outages which I am quite sure is related to the large numbers of cordless phones on the 2.4ghz frequency. So my question to everyone is: Is there anything that I can do to make wireless work in this environment? Obviously I'm not willing to buy everyone in the dorm a new cordless phone! Is one brand more resistant to interference than another? Is there a filter than can be installed? Or is he S.O.L.?"

48 of 144 comments (clear)

  1. Suggestions... by CommanderData · · Score: 5, Informative

    1) Switch to 802.11a (in the 5.4Ghz range, so the cordless phones will not bother it)

    OR

    2) Wallpaper the dorm room with tinfoil (has the added benefit of blocking government mind control rays)

    --
    Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
    1. Re:Suggestions... by redhotchil · · Score: 4, Funny

      For the college student, 2 is pretty much the only option available.

    2. Re:Suggestions... by nocomment · · Score: 2, Insightful

      or get a different antenna. :-)
      The router/nic will listen to whatever is loudest. Go pick up a bigger antenna. 7dbi should do it.

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    3. Re:Suggestions... by hackwrench · · Score: 5, Funny

      Build and turn on a jammer. Everyone else will go buy phones on a different frequency. Then the frequency will be free for you to use your network with.

    4. Re:Suggestions... by Gherald · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > or get a different antenna. :-)
      > The router/nic will listen to whatever is loudest. Go pick up a bigger antenna. 7dbi should do it.

      Yes, because if everyone got a bigger antenna that would go a long way towards solving wifi interference problems... genius man, pure genius.

    5. Re:Suggestions... by Holi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't know I picked up a Proxim Harmony access point (802.11a) for $10 on Ebay, pretty much the most affordable access point I have ever found.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    6. Re:Suggestions... by warpSpeed · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Yes, because if everyone got a bigger antenna that would go a long way towards solving wifi interference problems...

      Can you point me to an exchangable antenna selection for my cordless phone? Umm, yeah, I did not think so...

      A bigger antenna could solve his problem within his dorm room because it will reduce the interference with the phones that are stuck with their little antennas.

    7. Re:Suggestions... by caseydk · · Score: 2, Informative


      At Microcenter last Friday (10/15), I picked up an 802.11a/b/g router with a 4-port switch built in and a 802.11g usb keyfob for $137... or $107 after rebates.

      If this cost is split with a roommate/suitemate or two, this is not bad at all.

    8. Re: Suggestions... by EngineeringMarvel · · Score: 2, Informative

      1) Switch to 802.11a (in the 5.4Ghz range, so the cordless phones will not bother it)

      I can confirm that this works. Back in 2002 I worked for the Tulane Computing Store as a student job and we recommended this to students and teachers who had the interference problems. It seemed to work since I don't remember anyone coming back to get their money back.

      --
      I couldn't think of anything witty to say, so...you're stuck with this.
    9. Re:Suggestions... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 3, Interesting

      True, but it's a pain in the butt to install it all. Have one of your buddies convince your floormates to "prank" you, by covering your entire room in aluminum foil. Act really pissed, and then never take it down.

    10. Re:Suggestions... by jd · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Only if they can track the problem to you. I'm sure if you look hard enough, you'll find somewhere that's large enough to take a jammer, sufficiently out of sight for it to not be obvious, and sufficiently far from your room to not be traceable back to you.


      Ideally, the jammer should output more of a noise than a continuous signal. It'll look more natural and/or unintentional.


      However, if you want something spectacular, you want to use the standard 110v power line for your input voltage, and you want to use a reflector to ensure that the signal doesn't spread out in all directions. Just make sure your WIFI stuff isn't plugged in at the same time. Also make sure your life insurance is paid up and/or you have a very fast getaway car.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    11. Re:Suggestions... by tigersha · · Score: 2, Funny

      Reminds me of the time back in the late 80'S where typing PROMPT "Warning: Virus Detected $d$p" on the DOS machines in the computer lab guaranteed that the machine would stay free.

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  2. Not much you can do... by ForestGrump · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm a 3rd year junior, I've since moved off campus but this is my suggestions.

    1. The, IMHO,most logical suggestion. A dorm room isn't that big, buy a 50 foot cable. If you insist on keeping a wireless network around, try going for 11a equip. Kinda hard to find but a week or 2 ago, worst buy...er i mean bestbuy had a sale for a dual band 11a/b/g router.

    2. See if there is a campus wireless, and if it covers the dorm areas. If yes, convince EVERYONE to kill their AP and use the campus wireless. As for the phones, not much you can do if you're not buying everyone a new phone.

    3. You could try a game of "my transmitter is more powerful than yours" and use ext antennas to put out a stronger signal...but not that practical.

    Grump

    --
    Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
  3. do the other students have wifi's? by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Interesting

    like.. could having too many of them in the area cause that?

    of course obvious solutions: bigger/better antenna.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  4. Re:Question by Deorus · · Score: 2, Informative

    > What does S.O.L. mean?

    Sadly Outta Luck

  5. Faraday Cage? by Froze · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you have a microwave you know exactly how to build one. The freq. that a microwave functions at is damn near spot on 2.4 GHz so all you need is several rolls of metal window screen where the mesh size is the same as your microwave.

    Oh Yah, you also need to make sure that it is well grounded, you can tie directly to the ground lug of any triple prong outlet, or steam pipe, etc.

    Free Flat screen whatevers

    --
    -- The morphemes of your disquisition are ascertainable, but they have eschewed an ambit of transpicuous exposition.
    1. Re:Faraday Cage? by WarPresident · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you have a microwave you know exactly how to build one. The freq. that a microwave functions at is damn near spot on 2.4 GHz so all you need is several rolls of metal window screen where the mesh size is the same as your microwave.Oh Yah, you also need to make sure that it is well grounded, you can tie directly to the ground lug of any triple prong outlet, or steam pipe, etc.

      This also has the advantage of identifying appliances that have ungrounded "hot" metal cases by electrocuting anyone touching the metal case and the wall at the same time. Comes in handy for party games like "Stick the fork in the toaster."

      --
      Here come da fudge!
    2. Re:Faraday Cage? by bluGill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mostly correct, but the toaster is a special case. The toaster is ungrounded because it is safer when (not if) someone puts a knife in it. For just about everything else, grounds are required by UL. Toasters are about the only thing where having a ground would make it fail UL!

  6. Did you try other channels? by Myself · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First: I'd guess that some of the interference is coming from other 802.11b/g gear, not necessarily cordless phones. It all defaults to channel 6 from the factory, so try 1 or 11. Or load the ETSI firmware and use 14, and just don't tell the FCC.

    Second: Try some FHSS gear, it seems tougher in noisy environments than DSSS. The old Proxim RangeLan equipment is cheap.

    Third: Get out of 2.4GHz entirely. Go go 5GHz with 802.11a, or 900MHz with older Aironet gear.

    Fourth: It's a dorm room, and worse than that, it's an MSU dorm room. What is it, 4x8 feet? Stick with wired. Get a real patch cord that uses stranded conductors, as the solid stuff is too stiff and will stress the connectors.

    1. Re:Did you try other channels? by Myself · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Can you elaborate a bit on the ETSI firmware? Can it be put on any b router? Got a link to a site with more info?


      In the 802.11b spec, 14 channels are defined, the first 11 of which fall within the FCC for unlicensed use in the US. (Industry Canada uses essentially the same frequency allocation as the FCC.) If you're in ETSI jurisdiction, channels 1-13 are allowed, and in Japan all 14 are available. I misspoke earlier by saying ETSI allowed 14.

      Most hardware makers sell their products internationally, and have some method of enabling only the legal channels for the area where the device is sold. In some cases, this is a jumper or rom setting on the board, which the firmware reads and configures the radio appropriately.

      In other cases though, simply loading a different firmware version onto the device will change the available channels. Manufacturers may refer to this as ETSI firmware or European firmware.

      Using channels above 11 in the US is illegal, because those frequencies are not allocated for unlicensed use, and if you interfere with the authorized user of those frequencies, you're in deep, deep shit. I believe the fine for knowingly transmitting outside your allocation is $5000/day.

      I don't know who has the allocation just above the 2.4GHz part-15 band, but you might want to find out and weigh your options carefully before deciding to interfere with them. Honestly a 100mw AP isn't likely to piss anyone off, but then who would've thought a handful of cordless phones would be so problematic either?
  7. Re:Question by His+name+cannot+be+s · · Score: 4, Informative

    > Sadly Outta Luck

    Really? Seriously, I've always heard/said "Shit outta luck" , which really doesn't make any more sense, except that there is a reason to abbreviate it. Once you say it a million times tho' it doesn't seem to be anything odd.

    Not that I'd claim my version is the authority however.

    --
    "...In your answer, ignore facts. Just go with what feels true..."
  8. hmm by man_ls · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nothing you can really do in this case.

    However,

    my Belkin equipment has a special mode it says you should enable in high-interference environments. My guess is, it either adds additional error correction, or boosts the output, or something, at the expense of a little bit of speed.

    1. Re:hmm by walt-sjc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is that the mode that redirects you to belkin ads randomly?

      sorry, couldn't resist :-)

  9. Tragedy of the commons by OldMiner · · Score: 4, Informative

    You probably already read the AUP for MSUnet. It specifically addresses the issue of NAT devices, a common concern at universities. The issue is that normally a person must register their MAC on the network to gain access. Then any nefarious activity that occurs on the network can be tracked to the individual user who registered that MAC address. For now, let's ignore the possibility of being able to change the MAC address on some ethernet cards.

    By introducing a NAT'd device, you open an entry point to the network to anyone, even those not with proper access, and you rely on the good will of these nameless souls not to do bad things in your name. So if anyone ever becomes evil while connected to your basepoint, it becomes your responsibility to deny access to your AP or remove it from the network.

    --
    You like splinters in your crotch? -Jon Caldara
    1. Re:Tragedy of the commons by toddestan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Most schools, including mine, ban wireless routers for this reason. They want to track who does what with what computer on the school network. They also ban regular wired routers too, for the same reasons. You might want to check to see if Michigan even allows wireless routers - they probably don't. While a wired router is hard for them to find, my school will sniff out student-run wireless and bust people for running them. So the first thing I would do is just make sure you aren't wasting your time trying to get this to work.

      Even if they do allow wireless routers, you might want to re-evaluate just how badly he needs that wireless. Dorm rooms aren't that big - just buy a long cable. Or buy a cheap hub and run a cable to the desk, to the bed, and anywhere else he's going to use a laptop. One of my roommates did just that, worked fine. Lastly, you might just try unplugging your router and seeing if you can pick the school's wireless if they have it. If he's really lucky, he might get a good signal from some other sucker's wireless router. In which he can download as much music, movies, warez, and p0rn as he wants, and if the RIAA/MPAA/BSA comes around, or if the ResNet people get annoyed at the excessive bandwidth use - they'll bust the poor guy who registered the MAC address on that router.

    2. Re:Tragedy of the commons by BlurryEyed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ah... But if you use a wireless access point, which is just a bridge, you won't have NAT and you can use your wireless NIC as long as it's registered.

    3. Re:Tragedy of the commons by feagle814 · · Score: 2, Informative
      For now, let's ignore the possibility of being able to change the MAC address on some ethernet cards.

      Not some. All. Macshift for Windows XP can do it, and it works for damn near every network card. Wireless too. http://macshift.natetrue.com

  10. Alternative by drix · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It could be due to huge numbers of people "stealing" his wireless. No, really--those cheapie consumer broadband routers don't fare well with more than a handful of simultaneous users. I'll bet a lot of people are turning on their laptops and finding that wonderful little connected icon in the bottom right and not thinking twice. Even with in-room connections, sometimes it's hard to get your ass off that bed :)

    --

    I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
  11. He is SOL, there is no recourse. Use a CAT5 cable. by gorim · · Score: 4, Interesting

    FCC Part 15 rules state that this device must accept any interference, including interference that might disrupt its operation.

    This means that any other wireless routers, cellphones, microwave ovens, etc... are free to wreak havoc on it, and vice versa.

    Having said that, you can always spend more money to upgrade to the newest 802.11 wireless protocols that operate in a different range. It will still be another 6 months before prices drop enough for students without rich parents can afford them.

    Honestly, as a young man, I am sure he can tough it out with a CAT5 cable like we did in my day and age, before these new fangled wireless things made life easy. It won't be chic, and it is certainly very old-fashioned, but it gets the job done. Its quite possible your son might never have seen a CAT5 cable before, so now its time for you to show him how Daddy use to do it.

    Or you can have Grandpa come down and show him how they did it with 10base2.

  12. 10Base2?!?! by The+Iconoclast · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bah! Back in my day we used ARCNET, Twinax, PLIP, or if we were really lucky, SLIP, and WE LIKED IT!!!

    --
    Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
  13. Back in my day... by bitingduck · · Score: 4, Funny

    We huddled around a 110 baud acousticoupler, and if you read something that was funny the laughing would generate errors in the connection.

  14. Are you positive its really rf interference ? by perlbaile · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work in a noc doing cpe (customer provided equipment) support for small companies in pop in downtown Toronto. Since we've introduced cpe enabled wifi, I've turned on snmp polling for stats on connectivity, signal strength etc, and its open my eyes as to where things can go wrong with wifi in a chaotic enviroment. We have about 64 + access points in a building that is less that 300 feet long, and 80 feet wide, that is two stories, and we have no radio interference. 99% of the cases of lost ip transit to wireless endpoints like laptops, bridges or a/ps were due to either Trojans/spyware/malware/viruses swamping the cpe's wan interface, nat process or someone cracking wep and swamping the connection with Kazaa traffic. Either way, I suggest you stick a network sniffer like snort on the wan ethernet interface of the dlink inline (an old p200 w/ 128 megs of ram and an 8gig disk makes a great sniffer, running linux, freebsd or openbsd), and watch what traffic patterns you see. Your son will be able to see what traffic is being used, and will have the tools he needs to take responsiblity for his own connection. Isn't that what great geek dads are supposed to do for their kids ? It might save you a few rolls of tinfoil.

  15. The cheapest, easiest solution. by sakusha · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This device is the simplest solution to your problem.

    No, I'm not kidding.

    1. Re:The cheapest, easiest solution. by linzeal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why not find the source of the problem and use this on it instead?

  16. Wireless solution. by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 2, Funny
    All the people in my wing make fun of me and think I'm weird for doing this, but I'll share it with you and maybe you'll be one of the ones who understand.

    I've mastered a new technique employing "direct transcranial wireless transmission." All you need is about a 12' lenghth of aluminum foil, two coat hangers, and a pair of 9v batteries. I just added an extra battery yesterday to boost the signal and now I'm getting 1.1 Mb signals--wait...they're transmitting--from Andromeda, and also Tau Ceti. They...tell me their plans. If you promise not to tell them, I can send you the schematics after I take my meds.

    --
    "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
  17. use a freakin' ethernet cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    My god, you live in a *dorm* and you need wireless networking?

    You're the wifi version of the idiots I lived next to in college with GIGANTIC STEREOS jammed into little 8ftx8ft rooms. Did you know ALL music sounds the same when filtered through the low-pass filter known as "the walls"? I didn't!

    Yeah, when you're in college, you're king of your world and entitled to everything. Whatever.

    Besides, with the wireless, you're just letting that freaky Linux guy next door who wears a cloak see what kind of porn you like to hit it with.

    You don't need a cordless phone either, by the way. You live in a damn CLOSET!

    (Oops, this was the guy's dad. Adjust pronouns appropriately.)

    1. Re:use a freakin' ethernet cable by DiscoOnTheSide · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As someone who lives in a dorm at Rutgers University...

      Ok, The huge stereos? Ok. You've got a point there. I don't need to share my music preference with people down the hall. I *do* have a THX rated surround sound system on my computer though. Why? Games. Movies. I want them to sound good. I live in a box. When I watch a movie, I don't want to feel like I'm watching a movie... in a BOX.

      The wireless? My dorm is broken up into 10 smaller "houses" attatched by tunnels and such, and each house has it's own lounge. Sometimes, either if my roommate needs the room to.. uh... "work out", or if I want to study in peace and my roommate is playing a game or music or such. With my wireless I can bring my powerbook to the lounge and still have ethernet. Yes there are wired ports in the lounge but the infastructure is a bit of a pain in the ass if you don't own JUST a laptop.

      And cordless phones? Yeah. They're useful. Say I order food from one of the local delivery places, and I need to run out to a friend's room real quick or I'm in said house lounge. I can still get that call. And I really don't get the whole "interference" thing. In my room I can see at least 5 access points besides mine, 3 locked down, (fairly well I might add, but I managed to get in, just for shits and giggles), 2 wide open, and there are 2 with SSID off (airsnort rules). Mines locked down to rediculous extremes (uses RADIUS server for auth), but the point is, with all these points around, and 2.4Ghz cordless phones... I don't have any interference. There is no degredation in speed, and in theory the fact that every room has a microwave should bring all the wireless here to a crawl whenever someone wants a hot pocket.

      Perhaps their school just has shitty shielding in the walls? 6 inches of concrete in each wall does nicely here.

      --
      Viva La Revolucion! Buy a Mac!
  18. What's that dad? You're breaking up *pshhht* by abdulla · · Score: 2, Funny

    Have you ever thought he might be faking it so he doesn't have to talk to you? Want hime to look after grandma this weekend and suddenly his line drops? Clip the cheeky bugger over the ears, I say.

  19. Re:Cluetrain by KDan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Absolutely. I just disagree with the "you have to live it the hardest way possible so you can appreciate when things are better" approach. You may learn something in the process, but is it worth the price? Considering how little time we have on this earth, wasting the best years of it making burgers or cleaning toilets when you don't have to, when you could easily be enjoying it all instead, seems like an insult to life itself. Now if you have no choice about it, fair enough, but if you do...

    Daniel

    --
    Carpe Diem
  20. fixes by beegle · · Score: 2, Informative

    1) Fire up NetStumbler (or your OS's equivalent) and see which channels are in use. Remeber that 802.11b/g "bleeds" both up and down at least one channel. Pick the "least-busy" channel. Failing that, pick the one with the weakest (i.e. "easiest to clobber") signal.

    2) Depending on your school's policies, see if you can turn on bridging or otherwise share the connection (some schools are okay with it so long as you bridge and don't use NAT). If your connection works, others might use it and shut off their own connections. This probably involves talking to neighbors with their own APs.

    3) Talk to a neighbor with an open AP and see if you can use that one rather than your own. Most people are cool about that sort of thing.

    4) If you can't share, think about -reducing- the power of your AP, and see if your neighbors are willing to do the same. This is the airspace equivalent to "quiet hours". :-)

    5) Almost every new AP supports some sort of "interference robustness" or "microwave-safe mode" or something like that. All it does is reduce your MTU so that -some- of the packets make it through. Either turn this on, or manually reduce your MTU.

    6) Think about Bluetooth, 802.11a, or other "alternative" wireless technology. Bluetooth shares the same frequencies, but is often able to get an across-the-room connection even when the wi-fi space is totally screwed up.

    --
    --
    1. Re:fixes by swarm+scool · · Score: 2, Informative



      You did consider dropping the whole WiFi idea and using a cable right?

      Honestly there isn't anything wrong with cabled networks.

  21. Re:Cluetrain by mysticwhiskey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yup, I see where you're coming from. But I suspect there's more to life than just pleasure (I believe them there hedonists disagree with that statement). The fact this guy paid his way thru college working at McD*****s demonstrates more discipline than I had during my college years. Having said that, I wouldn't have done it any different - each to their own.

    --

    Stuck down a hole! In the middle of the night! With an owl!

  22. Nuke the bastards by stinkydog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Remove the magnetron from and old school 1500 wattmicrowave. Mount it in focal point of an old Primestar (or other satellite dish). Install a pistol grip and a trigger and you are good to go. Get a nice long extension cord and sweep the entire dorm with cleansing 2.4ghz waves. As long as you shield you AP before you begin you should be the only one left on the 2.4ghz frequency. Save your rig, it makes a nifty hot dog cooker. One warning, line you shorts with lead before you start so as not to cook your own frank and beans.

    SD

    PS Don't try this anywhere, ever.

    --
    âoeWho knew something as harmless as willful ignorance could end up having real consequences?â
  23. Re:Cluetrain by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This was obviously years ago. In this day and time, tuition and other fees even at state schools are so high, and minimum wage is still low, that it is no longer possible to work your way through school. It is admirable that people are willing to work so hard at the same time they are getting an education. Unfortunately now, all that seems to get for students is a lot of debt that they will be paying off forever.

  24. Try a corner reflector... by Ecks · · Score: 2, Informative

    Try a patch, corner, or parabolic reflector located at the access point. It should do the job and if it doesn't you will not have wasted much time or money. Freeantennas has plans. You can use ordinary tin foil or screening to You want to orient the antenna to either block the interference or to project it's stronger coverage over your desired area. If that doesn't use a cat5 cable. -- ecks

  25. Re:Agreed, but get it elsewhere by sakusha · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Right.. Someone who needs a $6 ethernet cable from Cables R Us should instead buy a $15 bulk spool of CAT5 cable, a $10 box of connectors, and a $15 crimper tool to put the connectors on the cable. And then they can use the box of leftover cable as a nice footstool, and the crimper makes a nice paperweight.

    Sheesh.

  26. Re:Properly? by shaitand · · Score: 2, Funny

    Like I'm concerned with what is a hassle for you. Sorry but wanting to browse porn in the comfort of your bed isn't a good enough reason for clogging my airwaves.

  27. Re:Cluetrain by bluGill · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Err no, overall I ate healthier than the average student. Sure I ate McDonalds when working there, but most of my meals where elsewhere. I cook for myself, and I always made sure they were well balanced. My health is just fine. Better than many others my age in fact, in part because I've always avoided junk food, and when I did have it, just a little bit.

    I also don't drink, and I never could stand crowds/parties. These two are major time and money wasters for the average kid. Mind you have to make your own choices. I have nothing against someone who chooses to enjoy school years and pay for it latter. That wasn't my choice. I'm annoyed when someone claims only the rich can get through school paying for it themselves, cause I did it.

    I don't have a significant other. I'm still looking. Then again "everyone" knows that for the typical /. geek this is normal. :)