Slashdot Mirror


Europe's New ET Life Search Programme

hotsauce writes "The Guardian has a report on Europe's ambitious new programme to search for extra terrestial life. ESA has started a program called Cosmic Visions which will launch a series of satelites, starting with Gaia in 2011, and possibly culminating with the Exo-Earth Imager, a mission consisting of 10.000 3-metre mirror telescopes. The French are leading the charge with Corot in 2008."

221 comments

  1. New processing algorithms by 2.7182 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've heard about new algorithms that are going into effect at the Aricibo telescope that use wavelets to get much better results. Apparently a lot of old data is going to be re analyzed.

    1. Re:New processing algorithms by Feminist-Mom · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's true - Coifman from the Yale math dept. that has a company that is doing this. But it hasn't hit the popular press yet. Among the mathematicians it is controversial whether it will work.

    2. Re:New processing algorithms by Moby+Cock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why is it controvertial? Do you have any links with that story? (I'm not being and ass, I'm just curious.)

    3. Re:New processing algorithms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      We have a range of computational tools available for signal detection, from ones that have very fast algorithms but suboptimal detection to those that perform optimal detection. Currently, SETI uses fast algorithms. Adapted Waveform Analysis is a tradeoff somewhere between those two. They will have to demonstrate that it's a good tradeoff, however.

    4. Re:New processing algorithms by essreenim · · Score: 1

      I'm not being and ass
      You're not sentient and you're not the personification of an ass

  2. 10.000 in European = 10,000 in the U.S. by benhocking · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those who didn't know.

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:10.000 in European = 10,000 in the U.S. by rguiu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nothing is lost with the exchange rate? 10.000 in Europe, may be 9,976 in the U.S.

    2. Re:10.000 in European = 10,000 in the U.S. by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 0, Redundant
      10.000 in Euro = 12.700 in US.

      Sir, your margin of error is enough to buy a Big Mac, or were you planning on eating it yourself!

      Mmmmm hamburgers... I'm hungry now.

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    3. Re:10.000 in European = 10,000 in the U.S. by zx75 · · Score: 1

      Whew, thats a relief... I didn't think they needed 5 significant digits to express a 2 digit integer value.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    4. Re:10.000 in European = 10,000 in the U.S. by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      I had the exact same worry. I was a little relieved that they weren't sending up 10.552 3-meter 'scopes.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    5. Re:10.000 in European = 10,000 in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps on the continent sir, but in Blighty we puntcuate numbers correctly, and still use the milliard. Toodle pip!

    6. Re:10.000 in European = 10,000 in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not Flamebait. It is stupid, therefore so are they.

    7. Re:10.000 in European = 10,000 in the U.S. by phyruxus · · Score: 1
      >>Whew, thats a relief... I didn't think they needed 5 significant digits to express a 2 digit integer value.

      Yeah, from a CS view I see that. I was thinking of precision from chem... they know they have approximately 10 telescopes, to within .001 of a telescope; in reality there are 10.000394654(...) telescopes in use. :)

      Ok, this horse is dead, anyone need the flog?

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
      "d'Oh!" ~Homer
    8. Re:10.000 in European = 10,000 in the U.S. by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
      > 10.000 in Euro = 12.700 in US.
      > Sir, your margin of error is enough to buy a Big Mac, or were you planning on eating it yourself!

      No thanks, but I could go for a Royale with cheese...

    9. Re:10.000 in European = 10,000 in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those who didn't know.

      I just thought they were using extraordinary precision.

      / my 2.000 cents worth

    10. Re:10.000 in European = 10,000 in the U.S. by GCP · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Yes, and for those who don't know, it is an error to write ten thousand as 10.000 when you are writing in English, regardless of your nationality. Using English as your language but a period/full stop as your thousands separator means you have an inconsistent localization, requiring the need for a "translation" such as the parent post to finish the job. Likewise, it is an error for an English speaker to use commas as thousands separators when writing in a language such as German.

      --
      "Those who have never entered upon scientific pursuits know not a tithe of the poetry by which they are surrounded."
    11. Re:10.000 in European = 10,000 in the U.S. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      10.000 in Euro = 12.700 in US.

      He said "European", not "Euros".

      He was talking about punctuation, not monetary units.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    12. Re:10.000 in European = 10,000 in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you have a stick stuck somewhere. Pull it out.

    13. Re:10.000 in European = 10,000 in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10,000.00 EUR = 12,796.20 USD
      ATM
      might be 13k tomorrow, muharharhar!
      your land is going down! muharharhar!
      muharharhar!
      muharharhar!
      muharhar har!

      did i say
      muharharhar!

    14. Re:10.000 in European = 10,000 in the U.S. by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1

      OK, hands up, who modded this Insightful instead of Funny?

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    15. Re:10.000 in European = 10,000 in the U.S. by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

      > Stupid Germans and French.

      And Spaniards, and Italians, and Scandinavians, and...

    16. Re:10.000 in European = 10,000 in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > > Stupid Germans and French.

      > And Spaniards, and Italians, and Scandinavians, and...

      And Poles, and Russians, and Czechs, and Ukrainians, and...

  3. Talk about accuracy... by over_exposed · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...a mission consisting of 10.000 3-metre mirror telescopes.

    This is an upgrade to previous versions of the plan that called for 8.735 3-metre mirror telescopes. Adding that 1.265 mirrors really helps I'm sure.

    --
    "The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his." - Patton
  4. Trying to contact ET by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 5, Interesting

    NPR did a story on the most efficient way to search for extra-terrestrial life, where it would be more efficient (energy/economic) to send craft out to distant solar systems rather than beam signals there. Apparantly the loss in signal strength is so severe (inverse square law) that signals get lost in the cosmic background.

    1. Re:Trying to contact ET by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Funny

      I say the most efficient way is to just wait for them to come invade us. Uses no resources.

    2. Re:Trying to contact ET by stecoop · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Was it also NPR that ran a story that most some SETI scientist are starting to think that radio waves is the wrong place to look. Some now believe that lasers would be used by more advanced civilizations as radio waves would be used but a brief history of the civilization.

    3. Re:Trying to contact ET by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      An issue with that is that spacecraft are slow.

      Another poster mentioned lasers, but a problem is that lasers are so rediculously focused that you need to be in the general direction, and looking in the direction of the laser to pick it up. Space is very big and it looks like the odds of picking up a signal are rediculously small.

    4. Re:Trying to contact ET by Atryn · · Score: 1
      An issue with that is that spacecraft are slow.
      Maybe yours is slow! ;)
      --
      Come play Moral Decay!
    5. Re:Trying to contact ET by magarity · · Score: 3, Informative

      a problem is that lasers are so rediculously focused

      At point of sending, yes, lasers are very focused. However they spread very widely over interstellar distances. Still, from a conservation of energy point of view a laser is much more efficient than blasting radio in all direction.

      But I think it depends on the nature of the communiction. If alien civilization #1 at star A already knows #2 is located at star B then laser is absolutely the way to go. Radio is more of a shout in the dark method. Whether you believe there are wolves or other travellers in the dark depends on whether you shout.

    6. Re:Trying to contact ET by RealProgrammer · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think searching for alien intelligence is overrated, but as long as you're doing it, using radio frequencies is not that bad.

      Advanced civilizations would realize that the ability to generate magnetic waves of a particular spectrum would be pretty universal, at least among alien groups with which we'd be able to communicate at all.

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
    7. Re:Trying to contact ET by Becquerel · · Score: 2, Funny
      An issue with that is that spacecraft are slow. Maybe yours is slow! ;)

      You think yours is fast? Mine can do the Kessel run in under 12 parsecs

      NB: I always had trouble at school differentiating between time and distance ;)

      --
      My spelling isn't bad, I'm evolving the language
    8. Re:Trying to contact ET by Mike+Farooki · · Score: 1

      Art Bell, the retired/semi-retired late-night radio host, in the mid-to-late nineties frequently had as a guest Ed Dames, a former military psychic aka "remote viewer". Dames was generally pretty outlandish in his visions--I remember something about pregnant martians overrunning secret military bases in the southwestern US--but I recall that he once speculated that SETI would have better luck if they searched for lasers.

    9. Re:Trying to contact ET by conway · · Score: 1

      Was it also NPR that ran a story that most some SETI scientist are starting to think that radio waves is the wrong place to look. Some now believe that lasers would be used by more advanced civilizations as radio waves would be used but a brief history of the civilization.

      Other scientist are suggesting that actually sending something physical over (i.e. a disk :) ) is much more efficient than beaming radio waves. Its the old FedEx comp-sci problem - an overnight FedEx with a large DAT tape has more bandwidth than a T3.

    10. Re:Trying to contact ET by freqres · · Score: 1

      Any alien civilization that has worked past the technical difficulties of putting lasers on sharks is one we should avoid I thinks.

      --
      Rampant Ninja related crimes these days...Whitehouse is not the exception
    11. Re:Trying to contact ET by bigpat · · Score: 1

      "I say the most efficient way is to just wait for them to come invade us. Uses no resources."

      Well, we would use no resources. But they would take all ours...

      and at least one beautiful woman to make her their bride, if Ming the Merciless is to be taken as archetype.

    12. Re:Trying to contact ET by wintermute740 · · Score: 1

      " I say the most efficient way is to just wait for them to come invade us. Uses no resources."

      Which has the side effect of having resources left to make it worth invading in the first place.

    13. Re:Trying to contact ET by perdu · · Score: 1
      Its the old FedEx comp-sci problem - an overnight FedEx with a large DAT tape has more bandwidth than a T3.
      Bandwith, sure, but how about latency? I'd rather send any messages at speed-o-light.

      --
      You only use 2% of your DNA
    14. Re:Trying to contact ET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm showing my nerdiness here, but the Kessel run was supposedly a test of how close to a black hole a ship would be able to get and still escape... both a test of the ship's power and the pilot's bravery.

      So, that statement would be "The Millenium Falcon can come within 12 parsecs of a black hole and still escape unhurt!"

    15. Re:Trying to contact ET by RKBA · · Score: 1
      "Other scientist are suggesting that actually sending something physical over (i.e. a disk :)"

      We did that in 1977

    16. Re:Trying to contact ET by Knara · · Score: 1

      There's some debate on this. Another school of thought (which I believe is more believable) says that Solo ws trying to impress what he thought of as "country bumpkins" of a sort. So making grandiose statements about how good a pilot he was didn't necessarily have to make sense, so long as they SOUNDED impressive. Besides, "12 parsecs" is 43 light years. Not exactly daring ;)

  5. Coordinated? by LewsTherinKinslayer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Are these efforts being coordinated with other such programs, such as SETI?

    1. Re:Coordinated? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      SETI is not a unique program, it's a general abbreviation (Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence) that covers every possible attempt to find SEnTIent life outside Earth. There are many SETI programs, Berkeley's SETI@Home is probably the most famous now.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  6. Notice how they've given up ... by RealAlaskan · · Score: 4, Funny
    Remember how they used to look for intelligent life? Now they've lowered their sights, and will settle for just life.

    I guess they got so discouraged by not being able to find any intelligent life here on earth that they just gave up on finding it out there, too. Oh, well, if we had found intelligent life, we probably couldn't have figured out what to do with it anyway.

    1. Re:Notice how they've given up ... by helfen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Now they've lowered their sights, and will settle for just life

      yup.

      They will analyze a light with spectrometer to reveal the presence of gases in atmosphere of palnets.
      Oxygen, ozone, carbon dioxide, methane may suggest that on the planet you can find life.

    2. Re:Notice how they've given up ... by RetroGeek · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess they got so discouraged by not being able to find any intelligent life here on earth

      There IS intelligent life here on earth, but I am only visiting....

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    3. Re:Notice how they've given up ... by narcc · · Score: 1

      Was your post ment to be sarcastic or not?

  7. 10,000? by turboflux · · Score: 5, Funny

    10,000 satellites...

    *Collective shudder from Chinese villagers*

    1. Re:10,000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny... plain and simple...

    2. Re:10,000? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      No, no... They WANT this. Don't you remember that the impact was a lucky sign?

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    3. Re:10,000? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Imagine a local Beowulf supercluster of those...

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  8. = 10 000 in universally accepted SI notation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    n/t

  9. Re:Brits Act Like They Invented the Language by AgentSmit · · Score: 1

    Isn't that exactly what they are doing, settling on a set of conventions?

  10. Doesn't it go without saying... by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ambitious new programme to search for extra terrestial life.

    I think any program to search for ET is ambitious.

    --
    500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    1. Re:Doesn't it go without saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats why they said ambitious

    2. Re:Doesn't it go without saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if the program merely consists of looking out the window every 20 minutes? "Nope, no aliens yet."

    3. Re:Doesn't it go without saying... by perdu · · Score: 2, Funny
      What if the program merely consists of looking out the window every 20 minutes? "Nope, no aliens yet."
      Dude! And we could all do so at work and at home and massively parallelize...

      --
      You only use 2% of your DNA
  11. Assumptions about ETs by ShatteredDream · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Many scifi enthusiasts often assume that our outlook on life is primitive, and that alien races advanced enough to be space-faring races would "clearly" be more civilized than us. I have never seen the logic in that. What if our brutality is the norm for how most races behave? Do we really want to contact potentially many races that would regard us with at least the contempt, as a species, that we regard "lower life forms?" At least without making serious moves toward a more advanced state of technological advancement.

    I remember an article on TechCentralStation discussed how absurd it was for anyone to assume that there couldn't be a race like the predators from the predator series. Who says that civilizations evolve the same way? A tribal warrior culture might actually thrive better in space than ours...

    1. Re:Assumptions about ETs by nizo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well in that case it seems pretty important that we find other races first so we can arm ourselves before they "discover" earth. I think we are safe from discovery since we haven't been broadcasting too long and any species that monitors our transmissions for long (especially TV) will be lulled into a stupor too quickly to come get us anyway.

    2. Re:Assumptions about ETs by justforaday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do we really want to contact potentially many races that would regard us with at least the contempt, as a species, that we regard "lower life forms?"

      Seems to me that we need to first move beyond considering other members of our own species "lower life forms"

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    3. Re:Assumptions about ETs by Reducer2001 · · Score: 1

      Remember, if ET's not with us, he's against us. We're gonna' smoke 'em out. Don't mess with Texas. Yee-haw!!!!!!!!!!

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    4. Re:Assumptions about ETs by jsebrech · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Many scifi enthusiasts often assume that our outlook on life is primitive, and that alien races advanced enough to be space-faring races would "clearly" be more civilized than us. I have never seen the logic in that.

      I believe the reasoning is that if a race manages to survive long enough after the discovery of atomic power, it will be civilized enough, and atomic power should reasonably come centuries before the ability to travel to other stars.

      It could very well be that alien races only contact other alien races once they've had the power to wipe out their entire race for a specific amount of time, like half a millenium. If I were the aliens, that would be the policy I'd have anyway.

    5. Re:Assumptions about ETs by Atryn · · Score: 1
      Don't mess with Texas.
      Thank-you. You now owe the State of Texas $0.05. Move along... ;)
      --
      Come play Moral Decay!
    6. Re:Assumptions about ETs by togofspookware · · Score: 1

      TechCentralStation! LOLOL!!!!111 They're the folks that sent me a stupid CD with videos on it talking about how there was no evidence of global warming.

      Man, that CD was funny.

      --
      Duct tape, XML, democracy: Not doing the job? Use more.
    7. Re:Assumptions about ETs by Auton · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It all comes back to Fermi's paradox. If there are intelligent (I prefer the term 'sophont') alien life forms out there, why haven't they contacted us?

      One solution says 'because they don't want to'. I find that solution very plausible at the current juncture. Odds are that if there is, in fact, a conglomerate of alien nations out there, they've set down a network of powerful signal-dampening sattelites around our solar system (the Oort cloud would be a good hiding place), controlled by a very strong AI which filters the transmissions reaching us, so that only natural phenomena and signals of our own making ever reach us. This could even be standard procedure for worlds below a certain level of technology. This is called the 'Prime Directive' solution, after Gene Roddenberry's Prime Directive from Star Trek.

      Of course, another (more Occam-friendly) solution to the paradox is "Because there aren't any"...

    8. Re:Assumptions about ETs by thesandtiger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The sci-fi assumption of socially advanced/peaceful aliens comes from the idea that if they weren't peaceful, they'd have destroyed themselves long before becoming powerful enough to travel. Which makes a certain amount of sense if you think about it. The cost of destroying humanity decreases as our technology advances - imagine the people of today with their hands on the bio-technology of the future. We'll *have* to advance culturally or we're fucked. Not to be all gloom and doom or anything :p

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    9. Re:Assumptions about ETs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, sure, we need to make sure the situation is perfect here on earth before we .. oh, wait...

    10. Re:Assumptions about ETs by tobe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you kidding ? One look at the A-Team and there's noooo way they'll be wanting to pick a fight with us.. any race of beings than can construct a working atomic battle tank complete with grenade launcher and working DU-round ballistic cannon from the contents of the average henchmans backyard shed is *not* worth going toe to toe with... and I _pity_ the fool who tries to get B.A. up in that spaceship...

      --
      11/2/04 - Isn't there something we should be doing that day ?

    11. Re:Assumptions about ETs by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem I have with the Predators -- and similar SFnal aliens such as the current Star Trek version of the Klingons -- is that "tribal warrior cultures" might be very good at conquering other planets, but they're unlikely to come up with the technology to do so in the first place. In our own history, warrior cultures have only enjoyed brief success at empire, and usually only when they ripped off useful technology from their more peacefully minded neighbors. Barbarian nomads may be tough, but always bet on the farmers in the long run.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    12. Re:Assumptions about ETs by Raw+Ostrich · · Score: 1
      I agree

      For example, imagine an advanced alien species which is living on a planet near the end its usefull time. There are billons of desperate aliens looking for a habitable planet. And then they find earth.

      Would they respect our ownership of our planet? Would we if it was the other way around? I do not think so. After all, we propably appear rather primitive and weird to their senses.

    13. Re:Assumptions about ETs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are still trying to find intelligence in the american administration.

    14. Re:Assumptions about ETs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude whatever you smoke, please share any!

      The other possible solution to Fermi's paradox is: Space is too friggin big, c is truly a limit nobody can overcome and because of this no civ has managed to contact us.

    15. Re:Assumptions about ETs by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Correct - it's the increasing *gap* between our old evolutionary psychology and our exponentially advancing technology that is so dangerous.

      We can only hope that Intelligence Amplification (IA/AI), mind 'uploading' off of fragile bioware, space exploration, and other tech arrives *before* some selfish Joe Schmoe primate tribe is too easily able to take out humanity in one bang/whimper.

      A good read on this idea: The Great Filter

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    16. Re:Assumptions about ETs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either that, or they will come to visit to exchange knowledge with the earth's greatest scientist: MacGyver.

    17. Re:Assumptions about ETs by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Another possibility is that the natural evolution of a civilization is to either quickly make it to a technological Singularity, or destroy themselves in the process. Such a civilization would then be so far advanced as to view us like we view ants (yet behave more benevolently).

      Additionally, it might turn out that the speed of light is a hardlimit (no warp?!) and the most intelligent course of action is to disassemble all the planets in your solar system to build an efficient matrioshka brain around your star to live virtually ever after.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    18. Re:Assumptions about ETs by Sein · · Score: 1

      How about the Kzinti? Their backstory does include ripping off hi-tech from their more evolved neighbours - while Known Space has plenty of things wrong with it, that's a not-stupid bit of background to the man-kzin wars.

    19. Re:Assumptions about ETs by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      "...it might turn out that the speed of light is a hardlimit (no warp?!) and the most intelligent course of action is to disassemble all the planets in your solar system to build an efficient matrioshka brain around your star..."

      Don't see how. The speed that matters is the one that we can reach. If that, coupled with the distance to a desired star, is less than the life-span of a sufficient ship, you'll find volunteers.

      The Matrioshka Brain idea does leave you at the mercy of the star, however. Perhaps scifi-like super-brains are just that, scifi, because we really just won't want them.

      Scattering out into the galaxy would be the "most intelligent" course, because the species will have a greater chance of long-term survival. That is, if you ask me.

    20. Re:Assumptions about ETs by MajorCatastrophe · · Score: 1

      A third solution is that they're not necessarily any more technically advanced than we are.

      There's always the assumption when talking about ET life that they fly around in space ships and are incredibly advanced. Why should that be?

      It is just as likely that they are still figuring out how to make fire, or communicate over 100s of miles, let alone through space. They may not even be aware of what planets or stars are yet, or may not be interested in trying to understand noise transmitted from who-knows-where thousands of years ago.

      Wouldn't it be scary if the only intelligent life to be found anywhere in the universe, on any of the millions of inhabited worlds, is human and no different or older or more technically advanced than we are? That would be scarier than finding a planet full of face-huggers.

  12. The reason we've haven't found aliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is because we've been searching using imperial-measure radio wavelengths. Once we switch to metric wavelengths and start decoding in French, we'll finally be able to understand them.

  13. 10.000 satellites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was it nessicary to say 10.000 satellites?

    Was 10.001 a possibility?

    1. Re:10.000 satellites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you silly American. They are European...that are that much more accurate than we are. They are advanced! /liberal

      P.S.

      Yes...I do know what the "." means to the Euros.

  14. This could is a good thing by davesplace1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I glad to see other Nations exploring space, we could all learn something. It could even spark up NASA to get on the ball.

  15. Re:Whats with the EU using '.' instead of ',' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's what SI notation is for.

    One period to denote the decimal place, and if you want to seperate digits in groups of three, you use a space.

    10 000.0 telescopes.

  16. Re:Whats with the EU using '.' instead of ',' by ZigMonty · · Score: 4, Informative
    Because in the EU they use ',' as the decimal separator?

    10,434.39 becomes 10.434,39

  17. Re:Whats with the EU using '.' instead of ',' by dTb · · Score: 1

    In countries that use the decimal point as a place seperator, the comma is used as a decimal point:
    2.5 (English) = 2,5 (French)

  18. Yeah right by _UnderTow_ · · Score: 0, Troll

    "The French are leading the charge with Corot in 2008"

    Does anyone else find this statement hard to believe?

    1. Re:Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wanker

  19. Just as long as they... by GillBates0 · · Score: 1
    The first, Gaia, will use a single telescope to create an extraordinarily precise three-dimensional map of a billion stars throughout our galaxy and will reveal exo-planets by the disturbing effect they have on their parent stars' movements.

    stay away from the Beta Quadrant. We all know those Romulans and Klingons don't take kindly to unauthorized surveillance activity.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  20. Re:Brits Act Like They Invented the Language by pete-classic · · Score: 1

    Set, like one of each.

    -Peter

  21. Search for intelligence by RealProgrammer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We search for a pattern in radio signals to find proof of intelligence, yet we look at a strand of DNA and not see it.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:Search for intelligence by delta_avi_delta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, I too am appaled that scientist don't leap to conlusions about non-human intelligence, based upon the existence of a possibly random collection of molecules.

      Hell, Ethanol is pretty good, the way those carbons and hydrogens just line up, must have been made by an Intelligent Designer.

    2. Re:Search for intelligence by mikael · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered whether DNA has some form of checksum capability built in. We know that there are genes that can repair DNA and that there are genes that can prevent uncontrolled division of cells, but we barely know how they interact, let alone how they work.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    3. Re:Search for intelligence by conway · · Score: 1
      We search for a pattern in radio signals to find proof of intelligence, yet we look at a strand of DNA and not see it.

      That's because we know that the 2-legged things the DNA produces are usually not that intelligent.

    4. Re:Search for intelligence by tobe · · Score: 1

      Ethanol doesn't go on for billions of base pairs and look very much like someone's designed a method for encoding, correcting and replicating living things.. it's algebra protein data transmission.. I'm not sure mr occam's sharpened the blade enough on this one yet...

    5. Re:Search for intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, please. Stick to faith man. The watch on the beach argument is unconvincing. We know a watch was created by an intelligent being, namely a human, because we have seen other watches we know to have been created by humans. It works because of knowledge we are bringing to the question. As for the universe there is no comparison. No one has seen another universe, so we can't say for certain that this one was created by anything. The same goes for DNA. Science is based on observation, don't make claims until you have made the necessary observations.

  22. It's a cook book! by CodeWanker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Based on the French affinity for frogs, snails, and other unlikely looking edibles, they probably think of this as a chance to try out new recipes with our unfortunate alien contactees.

    --


    "Wow. Now THAT'S a lot of angry Indians." - Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer
    1. Re:It's a cook book! by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1

      Of course! Now that the best wines come from Australia and California, the French need something on which to build their self-esteem.

      ("Perhaps a bit more butter on the arthropod, Francois! ")

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
    2. Re:It's a cook book! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this is backed by the Disney corp.

      They are looking for a location for their next theme park. ANYWHERE has to be better located than Euro Disney ;)

    3. Re:It's a cook book! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sure you are an unevolved carnivore yourself. Kinda funny when you call French gross, when compared to what you eat - blood and meat from cadavers.

      *puke*

    4. Re:It's a cook book! by CodeWanker · · Score: 1

      Now, now. Quoting Hitler will get you nowhere.

      "But there's one thing I can predict to eaters of meat, that the world of the future will be vegetarian!"

      --Adolf Hitler from Hitler's Table Talk 1941-1944 translated by Norman Cameron and R.H. Stevens, Oxford University Press, 1988; p. 125 -- end of selection for 11 November 1941, evening.

      --


      "Wow. Now THAT'S a lot of angry Indians." - Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer
    5. Re:It's a cook book! by Zoop · · Score: 1

      The French are leading the charge with Corot in 2008. ...and leading the retreat if space Germans are found instead of space frogs.

    6. Re:It's a cook book! by Jules+Labrie · · Score: 1

      I've seen such a storie before... But it was in America that this recipe had such a success... You should look more Futurama ! ;)

    7. Re:It's a cook book! by anpe · · Score: 1

      Now that the best wines come from Australia and California.
      Please. There maybe good wines in Australia and California. But you still can't compare them to the best french wines: Sauterne, Chateau Ichem, Pomerol, StEmilion, Cotes de Nuit Saint Georges, and so on. You could ignore them, but that's a mistake

  23. Different from SETI by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is about looking for planets, then analysing them to see if they have the conditions to support life (oxygen, co2, methane). SETI is about trying to recieve radio signals created by intelligent beings out there.

    In short, this is looking for any sort of possible life, SETI is looking for "ET phone home".

    SETI is fundamentally flawed, since even now we on Earth are broadcasting less and less out into space. We're using microwave and lasers to talk to our satellites, and everything on the ground is getting wired, or fed from satellites.

    The days of gigawatt broadcasting over radio bands is winding to an end, so we only will have made "noise" for a century or so.

    One could assume an intelligent race would outgrow the technology just as we have, or never use it in the first place.

    SETI is like trying to find modern Native Americans by looking for smoke signals, when they communicate using the phone or internet these days.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Different from SETI by andymar · · Score: 2, Informative

      SETI is not flawed, it's designed primarily to intercept signals sent on purpose towards us. Even if ET has long ago stopped leaking radio signals to space, they could easily beam us some messages.

      For the past few hundred million years, advanced ET could see that life is present on our planet. This is because of the amount of oxygen and water vapor in the atmosphere. With a large enough telescope ET could even observe continents on Earth.

      So it's not far-fetched to think that ET would call us.

    2. Re:Different from SETI by thesandtiger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While I don't necessarily disagree, I don't think that we're necessarily looking in the wrong place. Imagine a civilization far in advance of our own using some sort of communications technology we can't even imagine as yet. Surely it wouldn't be too difficult for them to make a massively powerful radio transmitter to call out? In fact, I can see one very good reason to think there might be such a beacon made by an advanced civilization. Think about all the trials and tribulations we're going through right now, all this uncertainty about whether or not humanity will survive - about whether it is even possible *for* us to survive our technology. Then imagine we get a signal from space, from another civilization, one that went through what we did. "We're here, we survived, and you can too. Good luck, and welcome to the universe." Call me sappy, but I can think of no better message we could receive.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    3. Re:Different from SETI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Faith is a fascinating thing...

    4. Re:Different from SETI by mforbes · · Score: 2, Informative

      Worse, however, would be a message saying "We survived, but all the other civilizations to which we sent this message perished shortly after receiving it. Apparently the very knowledge of sentient life, apart from their own, so violated their religious principles that they self-destructed."

      This is, of course, assuming that any ETs actually -have- religious beliefes.

      --

      Allegedly real newspaper headline from 1998:
      Man Struck by Lightning Faces Battery Charge

    5. Re:Different from SETI by freqres · · Score: 1

      No, I think the following message would be much worse:

      All your base are belong to us.
      You are on the way to destruction.
      You have no chance to survive make your time.

      This would be all the justification we need to prove that somebody set up us the bomb.

      --
      Rampant Ninja related crimes these days...Whitehouse is not the exception
    6. Re:Different from SETI by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      What makes you think they would not rather have us implode?

  24. Re:Whats with the EU using '.' instead of ',' by __aagctu1952 · · Score: 4, Informative
    OK people, why does the EU use '.' as the thousandth's place separater instead of ','? It's really stupid. How can you tell if 10.000 is 10,000 or ten point zero zero zero?? It's totally ambiguous! Oh sure, the CONTEXT, right, because scientists and engineers love figuring out the order of magnitude of a number based on it's context.

    First, as I really really hope you are aware, Europe is not a single hegemonous country, and neither is the EU (despite their attempts to make it so). Thus, customs will differ between countries.

    Second, how is "." for decimal places and "," for separators any less ambiguous?
    (if you must know, I prefer no separators myself)

    On topic: kudos to ESA! Although I severely doubt that we'll find any ETs, projects like these almost always get a lot of beneficial scientific data as a bonus... and if not, you at least get a few pretty pictures out of it ;-)
  25. Search for life by delta_avi_delta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I really wish that some of these vast quantities of capital would be invested the the Search for Asteroids.

    It would just be typically ironic for our SETA projects to be succesful just as we're decimated by an asteroid

    1. Re:Search for life by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Decimated wouldn't be a big deal, 9 out of 10 of us would survive. Annihilated, or completely destroyed would suck.

      Decimation was when the Romans would punish the troops for failure by lining them up, and killing every 10th soldier. Thus, decimating means "reducing by 1/10th".

      Now, excuse me, I'm off to correct other misuses of words. I just heard some guy down the hall say it's "ironic" that there's no more coffee filters. Now where did I leave that tire iron?

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Search for life by delta_avi_delta · · Score: 1

      Fascinating! Thank you :)

  26. Re:Whats with the EU using '.' instead of ',' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    And furthermore, why can't you all speak English and have a representative democracy just like ours? Also, please get rid of any parts of your culture that are not identical to my own. Thanks, n1ywb.

  27. It's the damned french by Nursie · · Score: 1

    It's not all of europe, some countries seem to like to switch the more common (in the US and UK) uses of ',' and '.'

    Most notably the french.....

    1. Re:It's the damned french by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget us damned Germans!

    2. Re:It's the damned french by jamarsa · · Score: 1

      And us Spaniards! Adding to it that we europeans were doing math long before americans (and Arabs before, as we are using all Arab notation for the numbers).

  28. ETI search programs are a waste of $$$. by sciop101 · · Score: 0
    I was a fan of SETI.

    IMO Earth and/or humans are being ignored or ostracised.

    Why?

    Earth is remote... Humans are primitive... Humans are archaic... Humans are violent...

    MY FAVORITE!! Humans are not agressive. They must come to us!!

    --
    The only thing new in this world is the history that you don't know.[Harry Truman]
  29. Don't worry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They will surrender shortly after.

  30. Not really by Poulpy · · Score: 1

    In french (and on the ESA website), thousands are separated by spaces and not dots nor commas, i.e. 10 000 instead of 10.000

  31. Fermi Paradox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If there was intelligent life out there, it would be here by now.

  32. erm by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    Intelligent life has to start as "just life"...

  33. tall ship and a star to steer her by by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder whether Europe will, upon discovering "life" across the big pond of space, send missionaries in their grand tradition of civilizing the heathens. Centauran coffee, anyone?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:tall ship and a star to steer her by by delta_avi_delta · · Score: 1

      Surely. At least until americans figure out how to enslave the heathens...

    2. Re:tall ship and a star to steer her by by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      In that respect Americans were Europeans, though my country was the last "European" country to abandon slavery. Of course, Europeans were the first modern people to abandon slavery, and slavery is more popular than ever. In Arab Africa, it's an uninterrupted history boiling within genocides like Sudan, and underpinning even the old European slave trade. The irony is that Americans figured out how to free everyone, though lately the application has often reversed (usually in direct proportion to our space exploration).

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:tall ship and a star to steer her by by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      >> The irony is that Americans figured out how to free everyone..

      Errr WTF are you smoking?

      Since I moved to the USA, I'm more chained to my job by economic pressure and see more blatant propaganda/brainwashing every day than ever I saw in Europe...

    4. Re:tall ship and a star to steer her by by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I'm certainly not smoking the crackpipe that got you to hit the "Reply" button before finishing that sentence, which read "though lately the application has often reversed". You might not realize that the US Constitution is the oldest existing form of government on Earth, and the first to apply liberty to everyone, though people had to stand up for their rights under it, and fight tyranny with clarifications like the Bill of Rights and subsequent amendments, especially XIII, XIV, XV, XIX and XXVI. American liberty was a revolutionary invention that spread back to the countries from which the liberators came, enough that you now take that liberty, invented here, for granted elsewhere.

      Liberty is a process of human interaction, not a stable state at the end of history. Propaganda is the alternative to physical coercion that free peoples have substituted. And wage slavery forges chains of your own consumer "needs". The country is free, but you apparently have to free your own mind, too, to notice.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:tall ship and a star to steer her by by Kaa · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm certainly not smoking the crackpipe...

      Judging by your comments you are smoking something that's at least as good :-)

      Exhibit A:

      You might not realize that the US Constitution is the oldest existing form of government on Earth

      ROTFL. You mean before 1788 there were no forms of government on Earth..? (not to mention that a constitution is not a form of government at all).

      Exhibit B:

      and the first to apply liberty to everyone

      Well, obviously the US Constitution did NOT apply liberty to slaves. So in that respect it's no better than, say, the Athenian democracy which "applied liberty" [which is a very weird expression, but oh well...] to all citizens back in 500 BC or so...

      --

      Kaa
      Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
    6. Re:tall ship and a star to steer her by by radtea · · Score: 1


      Ok, I'll feed the troll.

      Slavery was outlawed in Britain (1837) before it was in the U.S. (1867)

      Women had the vote in New Zealand (1893) before they did in the U.S. (1920) (although in some states women had the vote earlier than that).

      So who taught what to whom?

      The rights enshrined in the original Bill of Rights were primarily the rights of Englishmen, and the American Rebellion was fought in no small part because the colonists wanted the same rights they would have enjoyed in England.

      Both the U.S. and British constitutions have undergone substantial changes over the past 200 years, but even counting from their respective civil wars the constitution of Britain as a parliamentary monarchy is hundreds of years older than that of the United States as a democratic republic.

      Offhand, I can't think of a single liberty that the U.S. has lead the rest of the world on.

      Freedom of speech is an English ideal. Likewise the freedom to defend one's home. Likewise the idea that only elected representatives have the right to impose direct taxes on the people.

      As in the United States, these ideals have often been violated by the government of the day--the current U.S. administration is certainly imprisoning innocent people without trial in Gauntanamo Bay, for example. But the idea of freedom is England's great gift to the world, including the United States. Not the other way around.

      The distinguishing feature of the American constitution is that it is a written document, which made America uniquely a nation of laws. That makes the current American attempts to create zones of extra-legal jurisdiction particularly tragic.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    7. Re:tall ship and a star to steer her by by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I'm only smoking quibblers. By "oldest existing form of government" I mean that every other country's form of government in 1788 is gone. And the Constitution is literally and figuratively the form of government; the people and their actions are its the manifestation of that form. Technically, the Constitution is an inked parchment, but I'm not going to dignify microquibbling. The Constitution did not deny liberty to slaves, even at first, though it required states to surrender fugitives from "service or labor" obligations, which slave states interpreted to include slavery - which was clearly outlawed by Amendment XIII of the Constitution. It was that amendment which applied liberty to the slaves, by freeing them. "Applying liberty" is essential in living free - without its application, it's just a concept. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    8. Re:tall ship and a star to steer her by by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      "No king" might ring a bell.

      King George III ruled his American colonies until we kicked him out. It wasn't until the French followed the American example even more diligently that the British monarchy liberalized to allow Parliament to rule more in its name than by the monarch's own hand. And Britain still has a monarch. American democracy has changed, mainly internal adjustments, since 1788. The British monarchy has changed almost beyond recognition, both internally and including external institutions.

      The Continental Congress actually drew more directly from the Iroquois federation and the Huron nations on its borders in designing a federal republic. Of course many of their ideals were English: until they won the war, they were Englishmen. But they put those ideals in action. That is not to say that the ripples from their "shot heard 'round the world" didn't reflect back - free peoples have much to learn from each other - nor did I claim otherwise. England's greatest gift to the world has been its inability to keep the lands it conquered, while inspiring their peoples to take their freedom, by force if necessary, and convert English talk to local action.

      Your inner troll needs a diet before you have anything to offer me.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    9. Re:tall ship and a star to steer her by by Kaa · · Score: 1

      I'm only smoking quibblers. By "oldest existing form of government" I mean that every other country's form of government in 1788 is gone. And the Constitution is literally and figuratively the form of government; the people and their actions are its the manifestation of that form. Technically, the Constitution is an inked parchment, but I'm not going to dignify microquibbling.

      Umm.. You are vaguely redefining concepts to try to suit your muddled thinking :-)

      A "form of government" is something like a republic or a monarchy or a theocracy. The form of goverment that the US Consitution specifies is a republic. There were republics (as a form of government) before the US Constitution.

      Moreover, a constitution is definitely NOT a form of government. It is just the basic, primary set of laws for a country. True, constitutions usually define the political structure which includes the form of governments, but just because a constitution SPECIFIES a form of government does not mean it IS a form of government.

      I think what you are trying to say is that the US Constitution is the oldest constitution still in effect in the Western world (Saudi Arabia would tell you that Koran is their constitution and it's older :-) ). That claim is correct. However it has nothing to do with forms of government.

      The Constitution did not deny liberty to slaves

      The Constitution pre-13th amendment kinda pretended that slavery does not exist. But I don't think it's justified to say that it "applied liberty to all" in a society with widespread slavery. Of course many (most?) Constitution drafters had slaves...

      "Applying liberty" is essential in living free - without its application, it's just a concept.

      I said it's a very weird expression because it implies that there is someone (state? God?) who "applies" liberty to passive objects (citizens?). I don't think it works this way. In fact, the US Constitution is very explicit about the fact that liberty is a natural, pre-existing, in-built feature of humans -- it's NOT GRANTED by anyone.

      --

      Kaa
      Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
    10. Re:tall ship and a star to steer her by by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely. At least until americans figure out how to enslave the heathens...
      You must be one of those people inflicted with the disease of "reverse racism" -- A term I don't care much for. I think a better term would be, for folks like you, "Nigger"

    11. Re:tall ship and a star to steer her by by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is a fascinating discussion of the nature of existence as "ideal" vs. "real" - in which you are trying to have it both ways. The US form of government is "constitutional democracy" - the Constitution defines that, as well as its flavor, "republic", and specific structural details of the processes by which its components interact. The writers and signers of the Constitution (and thereby the Constitution, by proxy) defined the form of the US government, while the politicians define its actual reality. Part of the form is to enforce the form on the content; another part of the form is to modify the form to reflect the content - those are the keys to the US government's stability and longevity. That interaction between form and content makes the more important practice of liberty follow the guide of the ideas of liberty, and update the guide as learned from experience.

      Others who claim an older government form, like the Saudis, are wallowing in propaganda - Iran and Saudi Arabia each invoke the Koran, but have very different forms of government, not to mention large gaps in the administration of even the common principles, like when each was under British rule. They get away with declaring their brand's "purity" largely because they train and certify those who interpret history and law for a largely illiterate, antirational population - and kill those who disagree, including each other.

      You're the one spinning wobbly definitions to suit your argument. The source code for the Linux kernel is just the "specification" for the binary executable, but the source is the kernel, except in selfserving hairsplitting rhetoric. If you say the structure specified in the Constitution is not the form of government, you have to say that the kernel is the array of charges in your CPU's local cache.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    12. Re:tall ship and a star to steer her by by Sein · · Score: 1

      Try Iceland. The Parliament has been running for a gen-u-wine millenium. You ought to recheck your facts every now and then...

    13. Re:tall ship and a star to steer her by by Kaa · · Score: 1

      I think we are disagreeing mostly about how specific the term "form of government" is.

      For you it's quite specific: if the US had, for example, a single-house Congress it would already be a different form of government.

      For me it's much less specific: say, a constitutional monarchy is a constitutional monarchy and I would claim that, say, UK and Sweden have the same form of government.

      The source code for the Linux kernel is just the "specification" for the binary executable, but the source is the kernel, except in selfserving hairsplitting rhetoric. If you say the structure specified in the Constitution is not the form of government, you have to say that the kernel is the array of charges in your CPU's local cache.

      Even within your metaphor -- the kernel's source is sitting as a bunch of files on my machine's hard disk, while the the kernel itself is a live process running in memory. Kinda big difference :-)

      But I think a different metaphor is better -- a constitution is a spec sheet. It's a specification document that describes what a program should do. Clearly, there's connection between the two, but just as clearly the spec sheet and the actual program are two very different things.

      --

      Kaa
      Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
    14. Re:tall ship and a star to steer her by by Elkboy · · Score: 1

      What would the US do, though? Claim they've got a hidden death star somewhere and invade?

    15. Re:tall ship and a star to steer her by by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      *You* try Iceland. That's hardly the Parliament and electorate they had when their foreign policy mainly focused on Vikings. You ought to be more realistic.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    16. Re:tall ship and a star to steer her by by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Once we get Bush out, under whom even the Space Shuttle has been on ice for years, we'll get to see how different approaches by US, European, Chinese, and probably other cultures - like "multinational corporate" - fare in space. Assuming we don't trigger an invasion *here* first ;).

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    17. Re:tall ship and a star to steer her by by Sein · · Score: 1

      Probably true - but then, the US Congress and Senate is hardly the same now as it was in 1776, is it?

      Everything always changes - and the connection between the form of government of more than a coupke of generations ago and the current one is more a matter of form than substance, I think. Hell, looking at my own country and the current government/parliament - the form's the same, but it seems to me that actual legislation and government has been outsourced to lobbyists; a big change from just 20 years ago.

    18. Re:tall ship and a star to steer her by by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      But it's pretty close, and the changes are enumerated in a handful of amendments to the Constitution, and the admissions of 37 states. Mainly the popular election of senators and unified vice-/presidential ticket, and presidential term limits. Of course the reason the US government has survived the centuries is its implicit mutability, within its structure, but that's exactly my point. Congress might now be much more a college of spokesmodels, but that's actually their job - merely to represent - and their own "character" and "opinions" are rarely helpful, except when their opinionated character is in tune with their constituents. Or (rarely) their best, though unpopular, interests.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  34. Your plan won't work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Things have changed since the Vietnam war.

    Canada and the USA have a treaty now that lets the USA bring back draft dodgers (people who emigrate to avoid the draft) from Canada, so you might as well save your money and stay here.

    There won't be any deferments for college like there were in the Vietnam era, either.

    I suggest you vote on November 2.

  35. Re:Whats with the EU using '.' instead of ',' by delta_avi_delta · · Score: 1

    Except in programming, of course, and most maths apps, since the conventions are generally US english...

  36. I know by fadethepolice · · Score: 1

    I can get her across the border withouth any check points... Not just the hell's angels know how to get across the us/canada borde with no probs.. And I am not being drafted so I can work there.. I plan on voting...

  37. Re:Whats with the EU using '.' instead of ',' by dunsel · · Score: 1

    You may not be aware, but using a "," as a separator gives you numers like "12,345,678.89". Not ambiguous at all.

    A simple example against the "." separator:

    There are 10.234 ppm of asbestos in your air at work.

    If you are using the "," and "." system you know that this means about ten. If you are used to seeing numbers like "12.345.678.89" you have no way of knowing if you have 10 or 10000.

  38. pfft by DeathByDuke · · Score: 2, Funny

    looks like we need tinfoil hats in europe now, theyre looking for intelligence, us!

  39. Leak by kahei · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    Someone seems to have leaked the Doom movie script.

    *orchestral strings swell louder as sun rises on ruins of base*

    The Rock (staring out across red dust of Mars, now dotted with demon corpses): We search for a pattern in radio signals to find proof of intelligence, yet we look at a strand of DNA and not see it. Uhuh.

    Female Lead With Shiny Hair: Oh, darling, how deep!

    Cute Freckled Kid Rescued From Demons: Now let's go back to Earth and kick DEMON BUTT!!

    *distorted guitar sound enters music, which turns into a party metal anthem as the credits roll*

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    1. Re:Leak by tobe · · Score: 1

      You are the head of a major movie studio and I claim my 5 bucks...

  40. Re:Whats with the EU using '.' instead of ',' by Atryn · · Score: 1
    (if you must know, I prefer no separators myself)
    Oh now that WOULD suck... How do you quickly read off a number like 7436764518422.94 without having to count the separators out in your head?
    --
    Come play Moral Decay!
  41. Re:Brits Act Like They Invented the Language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you sane? English - similar derivation in national citizenry titles, yes? The English did invent the English language; Noah Webster and his dictionary are the cause of differences that divide American English from proper English, British English. Natural derivation seems to have occurred as local dialects evolved. As to returning to one standard, the reverse of localization or intentional alteration of a language is difficult to reverse. To explain, investigate German. German is divided into Swiss, Austrian, and nearly a unique dialect in each Bundesstaat; the most separate of all, Dutch German, is very nearly a separate language entirely as it was formed based on Latin grammar. Each are generally more entrenched then the variants of English are but for this purpose the general effect is the same. The attempts to unify the language dialects with spelling reforms are usually highly contested.

  42. Re:Whats with the EU using '.' instead of ',' by Atryn · · Score: 1

    The alternative to "12,345,678.89" is not "12.345.678.89" as you suggest. It could be written "12.345.678,89" in one country and "12 345 678.89" in another country. Check out this site for more info!

    --
    Come play Moral Decay!
  43. Insightful? Bullshit! by SteveM · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This shows a deep lack of understanding about what is being searched for.

    The pattern being looked for is a pattern that cannot arise via natural processes.

    DNA can be explained as a result of natural processes. Note that I said CAN. It is only those processes for which a natural process can not be provided for which intelligence can be inferred.

    Consider the discovery of pulsars. They caused quite a stir at the time. But since a natural process was discovered that could explain then, the original thoughts that they might be evidence of intelligent life was quickly discarded.

    It is the same with life. At first it was believed to be miraculous, the result of a special creation. But as we learned more about how life actually works, we come to see that it can be explained as the result of natural processes. And thus not evidence of intelligent design.

    Of course, since intelligent life is a consequence of physical laws, anything life does can be consdered a natural process ...

    SteveM

  44. Re:Brits Act Like They Invented the Language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clarifications. Implication of Netherlands as a bunderstaat is an error, it is a separate nation with dialect of German.

  45. The planet Earth is in quarantine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The planet Earth is in quarantine;
    the visits were canceled,
    since visitors would be put at risk
    of malice, envy, power and slavery.

  46. Programme vs Program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ..Europe's ambitious new programme to search for extra terrestial life. ESA has started a program...

    Does anyone else find the mixed British / American spellings a little odd? I feel a little like a dork but this oddity was the most striking feature of the submission to me.

    Ahh the wonders of American / British Spelling Differences

  47. Re:Whats with the EU using '.' instead of ',' by Anynonymus · · Score: 1

    In SI notation the decimal separator can actually be either a comma or a period. Originally only the comma was used but there is still no confusion as the separator between groups of digits is always a space.

  48. Why I prefer the "," system by dunsel · · Score: 1

    If you don't use separators the number 10000000 becomes mysterious, and adding a $ to the front makes it frighteneing. $10.000.000 is much easier to recognize.

    Either a "," or "." separator solves this problem.

    However, when you see 10.234 this could be two very different numbers under the "." system. You can guess using context, but guessing could be very bad.
    BR Give me my $10,000,000 and 10,234 any day, I know what they mean and even if you don't know my system you know what they mean as well.

    1. Re:Why I prefer the "," system by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Informative
      10,234 any day, I know what they mean and even if you don't know my system you know what they mean as well.

      Er, no. It's still ambiguous.

      Under the old European system, they used a decimal comma. 10,234 is a little bit more than ten to a European. A million dollars is $1.000.000,00 on their side of the ocean, and $1,000,000.00 over here.

      Where possible, I try to use the correct SI format, which marks only the decimal separator (comma or point) and uses spaces to group blocks of digits:

      $1 000 000.00 or
      $1 000 000,00.
      Unfortunately, one then has to worry about a line break being inserted into the middle of a number--it's a pain in the neck always having to insert nonbreaking spaces. (Actually, I can't figure out how to insert one in these comments, which is why I put the examples above on separate lines.)
      --
      ~Idarubicin
    2. Re:Why I prefer the "," system by orasio · · Score: 1

      You give me 10.234 dollars, here, outside of the US, and I will give you back 10,234.
      It's a deal.
      10,243 means 10234/1000 to people outside of the US, and 10.234 means 10234

    3. Re:Why I prefer the "," system by zx75 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I do actually understand the "." vs "," systems quite well, I just couldn't pass up the opportunity for a decent joke :).

      Myself, I use the " " separator and "." decimal indicator as is now the standard for financial and mathematical purposes here in Canada. (Although you do see a "," crop up now and then.)

      --
      This is not a sig.
    4. Re:Why I prefer the "," system by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1

      Actually, the distinction (for once!) is not between the US and the rest of the world, but more between English and non-English speaking countries (and possibly only European ones, not sure). Here in Australia 10,243 has always meant 10243, same in the UK etc.

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    5. Re:Why I prefer the "," system by orasio · · Score: 1

      You are right about the english/non-english distinction.
      I live in Uruguay, southern America, and happen to know that throughout America, the comma is the decimal separator, excepting english speaking countries like the US.
      The fact is that, as we can't get along and share a decimal separator, the least we could do would be to get rid of the thousands separator, and use spaces if we need to.
      The thousands separator has no mathematical meaning, so we can get rid of it, if we need to.

  49. More cover-up, waste of money... by eclectic4 · · Score: 3, Informative

    See this. If "over 400 government, military, and intelligence community witnesses testifying to their direct, personal, first hand experience with UFOs, ETs, ET technology" isn't good enough for you, then start here to research our gov's own documents, and then go here and dismiss these reports with "swamp gas" or "venus" or "a flock of birds". And lastly, read "UFOs and the National Security State", one of the very best and most referenced book on the subject using our own gov's documents once again.

    This "we may contact other intelligent creatures someday" is a complete and utter farce.

    --

    "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
    1. Re:More cover-up, waste of money... by chrish · · Score: 1

      I was hoping you'd post a link to Unidentified Flying Outrage! but I couldn't remember the author's name.

      --
      - chrish
    2. Re:More cover-up, waste of money... by eclectic4 · · Score: 1

      Heh heh. Ahh yes, Bart's library check out. Love it!

      --

      "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
    3. Re:More cover-up, waste of money... by ravenspear · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Is that you John?

    4. Re:More cover-up, waste of money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for posting this, I had hoped someone would. It is kinda sad for everyone to talk of the eventual discovery of alien life when we already have hard evidence for it. The problem of course is those who refuse to accept it, I think because of ego.

      It reminds me of the book Childhoods End by Arthur C Clarke, the ET's arrived on earth they had spaceships that hovered motionless over our cities a la ID4, and possessed the means to travel among the stars as easily as we might take a drive to the mall.

      It was because of this that many scientists gave up the pursuit of scientific knowledge because they felt what good would it do to discover some pitiful bit of knowledge that the ET's had discovered 10 000 years ago?

      So I think for many scientists (physicists and astronomers mostly) their continued refusal to accept what already exists is based on ego and fear. Ego, because who could be smarter than us? What civilization could possess FTL technology or the means to accelerate at speeds that would kill a normal human (indicating the ET's possess inertial dampeners or something like it). And fear to think differently from their peers, because of course if one talks about ET's one must be nuts right? Of course the fact that Govt officials, Military and Intelligence officers testify that what they have seen and recorded about ET craft is legitimate is irrelevant to them.

      I think there are probably some scientists in the aforementioned fields who think ET's are real and our govt knows about it, but they are too afraid to come forward lest they be derided as nuts or worse. Hopefully, though when the full truth of this comes out perhaps then those skeptics will feel embarrassed for their staunch denials over the years.

  50. Re:Whats with the EU using '.' instead of ',' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Science is also based on the SI (Systeme Internationale) notation (based on properties of light and water etc. rather than body parts)

    Which explains why you Americans are not familiar with it :P (-1 Troll)

  51. I can't wait by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's projects like these that make you realize a lifetime is too short. I can't wait to see the results of this project in several decades, I just wish I could be around to witness the results of the first manned missions to these planets. If we don't blow ourselves up first. It's great to see all these space-related stories being featured. Hopefully this renewed interest in space exploration will become infectious worldwide. I can only imagine what the world will be like for my kids.

    Oh wait.. I think I remember hearing something about getting laid being a requisite for producing offspring.. can anyone confirm this?

  52. How many? by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny

    a mission consisting of 10.000 3-metre mirror telescopes.

    I'm not sure what's more amazing - the fact that they've projected the number of telescopes they'll need out to 3 decimal places, or that it appears to be a perfect integer. Unless they rounded it off to the nearest thousandth.

    1. Re:How many? by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, I know, they use periods to deliniate thousands in some countries. I'm sure someone will call me a dumbass though. Hopefully.

    2. Re:How many? by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

      I'm sure someone will call me a dumbass though. Hopefully.

      Okay, you're a ... no, I won't say it, sorry I'm such a tease.

      But for me, I'm well aware that "overseas" (from the USA) they use periods instead of commas to separate 3-digit sequences in large numbers, and the comma instead of the period for decimal point. I perhaps first came across this over 20 years ago when HP calculators of the time had a feature to swap the function of commas and periods. And the spelling of programme set me up to expect the "alternate" non-USA ways of doing things such as the period instead of the comma.

      One never-seen-in-the-USA convention that I first saw a British person use on a mailing list is the abbreviation of -ve and +ve for negative and positive. I found it annoying and thought it was his own personal abbreviation until I saw someone else using these on Usenet.

      It's interesting to observe that this is done to the left of the decimal point to more easily indicate the magnitude of large nummbers (presumably so Government Representatives can more easily distinguish between, say, 10^9 and 10^12 monetary units), but now I wonder why this isn't done with long decimal expansions to the right of the decimal (presumably mathematicians can count digits better than Representatives can). I do recall some books such as the CRC Math Tables that have a space after every third or fourth digit (it may not even be consistent, I know I've seen four-digit groups, and there may also be three-digit groups in the same book), but for the most part decimals are a solid string of numbers. Such a convention would be an improvement. Instead of:
      (USA conventions, sorry to yall across the Pond):
      3.141592653589793238462643383...
      one would have:
      3.141,592,653,589,793,238,462,643,383,...

      And yes, this is "tech-topic drift" but so far in human history it's "Orders of Magitude" more productive than looking for extraterrestrials.

      --
      Tag lost or not installed.
  53. Re:Brits Act Like They Invented the Language by pete-classic · · Score: 1

    The title was a joke.

    The fact remains that the SAME word was written in the summary with BOTH the British and American spellings. I don't have a big problem with the existence of the two standards, my gripe is with MIXING them. You know what, fuck it, mix 'em. But don't use two different spelling for the SAME FUCKING WORD in adjacent sentences.

    So, do you have anything to say that relates to my actual point? I mean, I used bold and everything. Maybe if you got off your high horse for a second you could understand what someone else is saying.

    Thanks for the rambling "lesson" anyway.

    -Peter

  54. Re:Brits Act Like They Invented the Language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dutch may be classed as a Germanic language but it is still very different from German. Given the huge differences I think you can't realy call Dutch a German dialect.

  55. Ob (Calvin and Hobbes) quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us." Ref: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Bill_Watterson

  56. Programming tip! by spectrokid · · Score: 1

    If you ever have to export floats to ASCII, please please keep the Europeans in mind. Excel expects comma's over here, and completely fucks up if it gets periods. If you export to a file which will not be opened in a text editor but in Excel, Access or any other program which will interpret the number, use a format like "0000000E00". The number 123.4 then becomes 1234E-1. This is the only way of writing a float which will succesfully import/paste into every copy of Excel on this globe.

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  57. Learn about SETI before posting by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    SETI is fundamentally flawed, since even now we on Earth are broadcasting less and less out into space. We're using microwave and lasers to talk to our satellites, and everything on the ground is getting wired, or fed from satellites.

    Where did you get the impression that SETI is looking for radio leakage from a civilization?

    Or are you just out for a morning troll?

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  58. No algorithms needed! by artemis67 · · Score: 1
  59. Re:Brits Act Like They Invented the Language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The attempts to unify the language dialects with spelling reforms are usually highly contested.


    Actually, there basically is one common spelling in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Of course, there are differences, like words which are used in one country, while being uncommon in others. But in general German words have an official spelling which is the same in all 3 countries, the only exception I can right know think of is that the Swiss dont use that special 'sharp s; character used in Austria and Germany (and write 'ss' instead). The contested spelling reforms are about changing the official (common) spelling alltogether, but not to unify it, since it is already unified.

  60. Gaia by Norg · · Score: 0

    I think the Gaia mission is pretty exciting, above and beyond the giant space mirror array. A precise mapping of the galaxy's stars, their distribution and relations would be invaluable. It also presents some great marketing possibilities while the search for exo-planets drags on.

  61. Slashdot's Law of Large User Numbers by gomel · · Score: 1

    As the number of users grows, the probability that someone flames your post approaches ONE.

    At ca. n_users = 9*10^5,
    i'd say p_flame > 90%

    You have to relax. It's simply unavoidable that someone won't like or understand your post plus has the time to reply.

    --
    Fight Frist Psoting!
    Browse Slashdot with 'Newest First'!
  62. Problems with the space-probe method by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    did a story on the most efficient way to search for extra-terrestrial life

    Sending probes is beyond our technology as a way to search for life - you have to either expect a return contact from the more advanced civilization or radio back the findings yourself. We can barely pickup the Voyager signals and they're still in our own solar system.

    It's also a pretty hit-or-miss way to contact other life.

    Imagine if we were on the receiving end. Say they were shining a laser at us - with a powerful enough laser they can light up the solar system. Every planet in the solar system could see the signal. Any observatory on earth over a year or so would see the signal.

    Now, imagine they sent a probe to our solar system. Where would it go? Would it land? On Earth? In a city? On a tundra? Would it be stepped on by a dinosaur or decoded by a physicist?

    Maybe it would stay in orbit or a planet, or at a Lagrange point. With our current level of technology if it's not around our planet we would have no idea it's there - we can't even catalog the NEO asteroids and they're alot bigger than a space probe would probably be. If it was in orbit and not known to be space junk would we send a exploratory team?

    The point of the NPR spot is really about sending massive amounts of data, but we're still working on the "hello, world" part. Once we've made contact it might make sense as a next step, unless "they" have a better idea.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  63. Outrage by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1

    The point remains: if you see the incredible, wonderful complication that is our DNA structure and say, "This is from a natural process", how in the name of tinker toys will you find a pattern in radio waves that is there by someone's design?

    Rejection of intelligence in the design of DNA sets the bar way too high.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:Outrage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you missed his point. He said you cannot infer the existence of intelligence in DNA because it can be explained by natural processes. In other words because it is technically possible that our DNA occured naturally, we cannot use it as evidence of the existence of other forms of intelligence. There is no bar, it is simply a matter of discovering something that has no other possible explanation but intelligent life. In this case, they are attemping to make such a discovery in radio wave patterns.

    2. Re:Outrage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because our DNA is not a 'wonderful complication', it is an amazing hack job.. why else would I be pissing thru my reproductive organ? Son of a diddly!

    3. Re:Outrage by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Simple answer. Radio waves do not evolve.

  64. Re:Whats with the EU using '.' instead of ',' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    incase it didnt get thru to you, thefreedictionary is a spam site ripping off wikipedias work

  65. As other posts say, they're already here by andy314159pi · · Score: 1

    I don't see why the Europeans want to go out looking for space aliens when they are already here. I'd say that the new conventional thought is that you are in a some sort of fugue-denial state if you don't believe that they have been swinging by regularly.

    The difference between common skepticism (the kind that the soccer mom next door might give you) and scientific skepticism has now been recognized by the average joe. Scientific skeptics say that the common skeptics now have a great deal of explaining to do. AND BALL LIGHTENING AIN'T GONNA CUT IT!
    www.nuforc.org

    1. Re:As other posts say, they're already here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bach never wrote a fugue! Bach never wrote a fugue! They never existed! They are fakes!!!

  66. Re:Stupid Euros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, you really must be a red blooded usian if you have to ask. Moron.

  67. But how would ET find us? by targo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We have all these programs for trying to find patterns in signals from space but are we doing anything to make life easier for anyone that is trying to find us? Sure, we are emitting a bunch of electromagnetic radiation from our broadcasts but how far would it actually reach to be detectable? Wouldn't it be more efficient to send powerful laser pulses that are specifically targeted at "promising" nearby star systems?
    Is anybody in the world doing something like this?

    1. Re:But how would ET find us? by oshy · · Score: 1

      Just as long as they dont think we are shooting a weapon at them.

      "Hey look zarjaz, someone is pointing a sniper rifle at you, I can see the red dot on your left head"

  68. Re:Whats with the EU using '.' instead of ',' by Elkboy · · Score: 1

    A negative answer (disregarding that a proper answer would be impossible to get) to the question whether there is other life in space might prove just as interesting to us than a positive one.

  69. Watch your language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm telling!!! You used a bad word twice!!!

  70. Best Idea? by Striker770S · · Score: 1

    sending out information is not exactly the smartest thing, especially if we got the resources a highly intelegent species needs (think independence day). Its almost like a person telling all his friends about this new and very expensive toy he got thats in his locker and then telling all of them where his locker is and what the combination is; not the smartest idea... Most likely the aliens will look at our planet, look at all the people on it, and then decide to put an intergalactic highway through it...

    --
    I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes. - Catcher in the Rye
    1. Re:Best Idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sending out information is not exactly the smartest thing, especially if we got the resources a highly intelegent species needs (think independence day).
      Yea,but didnt we WIN in that movie? Or are you talking bout the French translation?

  71. New overlords by Brutal_Adviser · · Score: 0

    Well, as an EU citizen, I for one eagerly await the arrival of our new alien slimeball overlords. Anything is better than the current lot in the White House.

    --
    Tone
  72. The French are leading the charge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If so, I for one welcome our new alien overlords.

  73. Extratesticular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah the Euro-pee-ins want to get involved search for extratesticular intelligence. Well, isn't that special?

  74. Re:Doomed To Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will never work, the French will surrender to the first meteor they encounter on this so called, "charge."

    So THAT's why there are no French capacitor manufacturers - they can't test them.

  75. U.N. joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The can use the United Nations to callabrate their instruments for non-intelligent life.

  76. Latest News by taycalmac · · Score: 0

    Great to see the French website was last updated in March 2004

    --
    A clean chord is a happy chord...