Slashdot Mirror


Cingular-AT&T Wireless Merger Complete

bigmase521 writes "PRNNewsWire, Phonescoop.com, and this thread on Howardforums.com, are reporting that the Cingular/AT&T Wireless Merger is now complete. Cingular bought out AT&T Wireless for ~$41B to become the nations largest cellular provider. Details of the merger, and full press coverage, including the audio of this afternoon's conference call can be found here, and Cingular and AT&T customers can see what is/isn't changing for them at newcingular.com."

51 of 331 comments (clear)

  1. Should have happened sooner by BWJones · · Score: 2, Informative

    Its too bad this could not have taken place sooner. I dumped AT&T a few months ago due to very poor customer service and because AT&T had absurdly high rates for international calling when I travel (calls from New Zealand to the US were something like $8.00/minute with AT&T) I went with T-Mobile at the time and have been for the most part satisfied, although coverage in remote areas of the American West is weak due to a less well developed GSM network. After reading an article in the Wall St. Journal (not linked because its a subscription article) this morning, it turns out however, even if I had remained with AT&T nee Cingular I would have had to deal with the same coverage issues because Cingular will move their customers from TDMA phones to GSM phones.

    So, just like when the TDMA markets were rolling out some years ago, it took a couple years to expand them to remote areas. I suspect fairly uniform GSM coverage throughout remote areas in the near future. Perhaps if Cingular provides better service and lower rates, they might win myself and many others back.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Should have happened sooner by tonsofpcs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had Voicestream/T-Mobile in a densly populated area in the East (Bergen County, NJ -- I live 10 or 15 miles from NYC, Paramus is here [I have been told it has the largest shopper to citizen ratio of any town/city in the US, and most of the stores are closed Sundays due to blue laws], and T-Mobile gave me the crappiest coverage I've seen. I stood in the middle of a major area highway (Route 4, it leads directly to the George Washington Bridge) and got nothing. Cingular used to use T-Mobile for east coast coverage, but they may be moving to AT&Ts towers. Also, AT&T Wireless was planning to move the whole system to GSM even before the announcement of the Cingular merger.

    2. Re:Should have happened sooner by ForestGrump · · Score: 2, Informative

      aah, phone unlocking.

      Greatest thing ever, IMHO. I'm both a Cingular and ATT customer at the moment. (long story short)
      I have 3 differnt phones (and rotate like girls rotate through shoes). All my phones are unlocked so it doesn't matter if I pop my cingular SIM into the ATT phone.

      Going international? Not a problem with calls (prepaid sim as the parent said).

      So, how to unlock?

      Firstly, IS IT ILLEGAL? I don't think so. Technically, even if "free", you paid for the phone when you signed the contract. I'm locked in for the 12-24+ months with ATT/Cingular. The phone locking scheme is to prevent me from using my Cingular branded Motorola V400 with ATT- and ATT hopes I'll buy a V600 instead (but no, i'm paying 7 bucks tax for the "free" phone.
      This article from oreillynet.com says its not too

      I've only unlocked Nokia phones so far. So, if its nokia, download from cnet here.

      insatall, find imei by punching in #*06#. Put that IMEI into the code generator. Turn off phone, take out sim card. Turn on phone again. Now, you need to punch in the unlock code generated from the program. DO NOT SCREW UP THE UNLOCK CODE! I WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE IF YOU PERMANENTLY LOCK YOUR PHONE. IF YOUR AFRAID YOU MIGHT SCREW IT UP, THEN DON'T EVEN TRY.

      moving on. Once your phone is unlocked, it can be used with ANY carrier. That's right. ANY carrier. To prove my point, I have ATT on my Cingular branded V400 and a Cingular Sim on my ATT branded Nokia.

      Happy unlocking!
      Grump

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    3. Re:Should have happened sooner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Here's one (very long) experience.

      I just signed up for a new phone with my carrier, AT&T. I chose a refurbished Nokia phone (a 6820, if it matters). When it arrived, two of the buttons were completely broken and one more was hard to push. This made using the menus (and thus the phone) pretty much impossible. I called in and after a brief discussion, they told me they were going to ship me a replacement phone of the same model (still refurbished).

      It arrived the next day. This time, all the buttons worked, but when I tried to access the phone's IM (instant messaging) feature, it popped up a Java error. Now this is when I got a real taste of customer service.

      I called them and explained the whole situation (how I just signed up and how the first phone I got was broken so I needed a replacement, and how the replacement was broken too). The guy then put me on hold (the first of many, many holds) while he looked into the situation. When he got back, he started to walk me through the AIM-via-text-message setup procedure, which is something completely different. I explained to him that I don't think he and I were talking about the same thing, and that the first phone I got did not have this Java error. But apparently, that info was all he could find. Apparently, their databases didn't even have an entry for the IM menu on my phone, so he had no idea what I was talking about.

      I suggested to him that it seemed to be a software/firmware problem with the phone since the first one didn't have the problem, and I asked him if they could simply ship me another replacement like they did the first time. But he said no, they were all out of stock on that phone (but I just ordered it three days ago...?). After putting me on hold some more, he told me to go to a local AT&T Wireless retail store to "get the phone re-flashed".

      So I did. I found an AT&T Wireless retailer, but the lady there had apparently never seen the problem before. When I explained that customer service told me to go and get it re-flashed at her store, she just gave me a blank stare and asked "Reflashed? What's that?". Then we spoke to another guy at the same store, possibly a manager, and he said "Oh, wow... you need some high-tech stuff to do that. USB cables and such. We don't do that here." The lady chimed in, "In fact... none of the AT&T Wireless stores do." Then I asked why Customer Service sent me to them, and they didn't know either.

      So when I got home, I called customer service again and explained the whole situation all over again. This time, the technician on the line didn't know what re-flashing was either. He said it was a very strange suggestion for the original tech to have made. Then I asked him whether he could just ship me a replacement. He said no, they were out of stock. Then I told him that they were still available at the webpage, so they did have some phones left, and I asked if he could please check to make sure. He put me on hold for a while to talk to his manager, and when he got back, he told me that they didn't ship replacements out like that. I asked him how I got the first replacement, then, but he couldn't explain it. He did suggest, however, that I can go online and order another phone and they would pricematch it after I was billed. I told him my credit card's limit wasn't that high and so that wasn't an option. Then he just told me to call Warranty Exchange. I just thanked him and gave up for the night.

      Annoyed at the entire situation, I ignored it for few more days. I finally called back a few days later. This time, I was sick of explaining everything so I just asked the tech to look at my account notes. She did, and thought about it some. Then, to my surprise, she actually sympathized with the situation and offered to ship me a free replacement phone -- a new one this time, since the past two refurbished ones were both broken. I didn't ask for it; she just offered. I was glad, of course, but then she looked up the phone and foun

    4. Re:Should have happened sooner by rwoodford · · Score: 2, Informative

      Kits are available on eBay to do this to most any phone. I unlocked/unbranded my Ericsson T616 and T68i this way ... all for a grand total of $15. The best part is that I was able to update the firmware in each phone to it's latest revision. This drastically improved the signal reception of my T616.

    5. Re:Should have happened sooner by Firehawke · · Score: 2, Informative

      I actually used to work for the AT&T wireless division. Sadly, the stores are an entirely seperate division of the company from the rest of the wireless-- it was, as of the time I was there, fairly standard routine to have a phone taken to an AT&T store for a basic reprogramming if required. Unfortunately, that doesn't mean that the stores knew how to do it. Some did, some didn't.

      Personally, if I'd determined that the call was going to take longer than the three minute limit (AT&T talk time policies are a complete and utter bitch.. I routinely got chewed out for taking a little more time on my calls and making sure the job got done right) then I would have immediately looked into the new phone angle. I'm really surprised they didn't get it done sooner, though. How long ago did all of this happen? When I left (four years ago), they still had a very lenient credit policy when it came to crediting someone's account.

      However.. you are right about the lottery thing. Some of my most vivid memories of that job was hearing some of the stuff the guy in the cube in front of me got away with. He had numerous reprimands in his file, but when I left they still hadn't fired him. Not to say they all were that bad-- many of my teammates were really good, but there were just that few that made things worse across the board.

  2. Network wierdness by CptChipJew · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have AT&T, and the area I live in (Los Angeles County) has lots of Cingular zones. Whenever my phone in on a Cingular network, I have to dial the area code of people I am trying to reach who are in the same area code as me. If you try to just dial the number without the area code, Cingular says it cant connect.

    This just happened to me again today, so this merger may be complete business-wise, but there are still bugs to work out of the network.

    --
    Vonal Declosion
    1. Re:Network wierdness by JerkBoB · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have to dial the area code of people I am trying to reach who are in the same area code as me.

      Get used to it. Lots of carriers in metro areas are moving to 10-digit dialing. Boston's been that way for years, and I know other big(ish) cities are doing the same thing. Now it's weird for me to see a 7-digit number, because I've gotten so used to the extra three digits.

      --
      A host is a host from coast to coast...
      Unless it's down, or slow, or fails to POST!
  3. Can you say.... by metlin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ....Deja Vu?

    Funny thing, back then Ma-Bell was broken down for anti-trust reasons, now all these giants are bigger than what Bell Labs ever was.

    And they are all merging. That's a very scary thought.

    I think a few years from now, almost all the business will be controlled by just a few corporations.

    I personally am not sure if that would be a good idea, that would certainly put smaller companies and businesses out, and these would not stand a chance against the big corporations.

    Not too sure how I feel about this.

    1. Re:Can you say.... by alienw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, if you think a couple of cellphone companies merging constitutes anything like the ma bell monopoly, you must be smoking something good. It's not like Cingular has anything except cellphone service, and even then it's doesn't have even 80% of the market. There are currently about 4 other companies I can think of that are in the cellphone business. That's way too many as it is.

    2. Re:Can you say.... by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I think a few years from now, almost all the business will be controlled by just a few corporations.
      You're right. It WILL be controlled by 'just a few corporations' because it already IS controlled by 'just a few corporations.

      There are economic reasons for this. Mainly that being a telecom company is expensive. You must have lines, switching systems, employees, et cetera. Competition is often a good thing, and it's often a bad thing. Some things, like telecos, power/water/propane supply on a local scale, cable companies on a local scale... why? Because every competitor requires a duplication of effort to achieve the same goal, and split the profit. After a certain point, boom. NOBODY is profitable and they ALL go tits-up.

      Ma-bell wasn't broken up because it was big, it was broken up because there was no way others could get into the market otherwise. It's not always compitition which keeps the market efficient, it's the THREAT of competition or elimination which does it. Utility companies generally try to keep rates low despite their monopolies because the state/county/city can kick them out if they don't. Cable companies try to keep rates competitive with satellite, and offer benefits over broadcast TV. Telecom companies, so long as there is at least a threat of being broken up to restore competition, will do the same (in theory).

      As long as there are at least two companies (preferably three), the only thing we have to fear is collusion. As it is now, they're playing "Who can undercut the others on the wireless service"... POTS is more expensive still, but that's to be expected since wires costs money... Blah, I'm turning into an economics professor. You can make up the rest, turn your homework into my inbox.
      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    3. Re:Can you say.... by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cingular+AT&T
      Sprint
      Verizon
      Alltel (they DO have national coverage, anyway)
      T-Mobile
      US Cellular (I know they exist, but I think there are large areas where you can't buy their phones (where I live, for one). They still work, though - we looked at US Cellular when trying to find a good actual plan (we were on prepaid))
      Nextel
      Tracfone (does that count, though?)

      Virgin Mobile and Boost aren't listed - they are really Sprint and Nextel's prepaid services, and Boost is most definitely not nationwide.

  4. I for one welcome by RealProgrammer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ..oh, I just can't do it. My wife and I use Verizon. It costs too much. We can call each other for "free" -- as long as we pay $100/month, combined. The coverage is ok.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
  5. Gains by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The rationale of this move, according to an analysis of the merger done by Businessweek at
    http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/oct200 4/nf20041026_3765_db016.htm

    "The Atlanta-based carrier has landed exclusive rights to the new Motorola Razr V3 and the Sony Ericsson se710a. Both are high-end multimedia phones expected to lure sophisticated buyers. The Motorola Razr is a design triumph. It's just a half-inch thick when closed. Open, it's as thin as a Q-Tip. Yet it manages to pack in a VGA camera with 4x zoom, 3D graphics capability, and 22 kilohertz polyphonic speaker technology."

    Its merger with AT&T Wireless will give Cingular 47.6 million subscribers, catapulting it past the 41 million customers that current market leader Verizon Wireless has. But that status might not last long unless Cingular can keep subscribers from bolting to Verizon and others. Cingular is plagued by above-average customer defections. [...] its churn rate edged up from 2.7% in the second quarter to 2.8% in the third, while Verizon's is hovering around a more wholesome 1.5%.

    Mergers are dangerous : you gain benefits (in this case, exclusive handhelds and a big subscriber base), but can go wrong. Only time will tell if the benefits outweighted the disadvantages in this case.

    1. Re:Gains by dala24 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thin as A Q-Tip?? How is that a good thing, i for one have come close to snapping my LG 5350 and that's a hefty little beast... Maybe from an engineering standpoint that Razr is a good thing, but for public useability, i'll go for utility and longevity over pure "cool factor"

      --
      There is no .sig
  6. AT&T's idea of a network by Faustust · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I live in a regular brick house (NOT in the basement or with my mom). I get zero-to-no service at all here. I have to walk two blocks down the street to get 1 bar, 4 blocks for two bars, and 5 blocks for full service.

    My phone works fine everywhere else, but I swear AT&T hates me or my house. I've had them out to my house three times to check the signal and they always say it's fine. Maybe Cingular has a better network/customer service policy.

  7. Cingular indeed by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    I must cay, as an AT&T cuctomer, I feel ctrange today...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Cingular indeed by d-ude · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My phone did that too for a few hours on 10/26. It eventually went back to it's normal AT&T Wireless though. Oh and my Ogo said it also when I checked it. I wonder why the switch, and then the switch back. I did call 611 for shits and it was the same IVR voice and menu stuff but it didn't pick up my phone number automatically...it asked me to key it in. I didn't go any farther than that.

  8. I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How is Cingular regarding bluetooth? AT&T? Do they pull a Sprint-Bitch(TM) or Verizon-Bitch(TM) and purposely cripple bluetooth? As a GSM network, I'm hoping they leave their phones' bluetooth virgin and pure so I can sync, use in new bluetooth enabled car, etc.

    The merger could mean I will, in New York City, be saturated with reception goodness. Each company on it's own was "ok to good" but overlap the two and Verizon IMO is shaking like the bluetooth criplin' bitch it is.

    *hopes and prays*

    1. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by Suffering+Bastard · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm a Cingular subscriber and I recently bought a Sony Ericsson T637, which is bluetooth enabled. I can sync it with my Mac and my bluetooth headset with no problem, as well as connect to other bluetooth phones. I'm not sure how Verizon cripples bluetooth, but from all outward appearances, Cingular does not cripple it all.

      --
      "Molest me not with this pocket calculator stuff."
      - Deep Thought
    2. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by plover · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Because it is just the coolest use of Bluetooth ever.

      You get in the car, and now your Bluetooth-enabled phone is using your car's stereo speakers for audio out, and a dashboard mic for audio in. It mutes the stereo when an incoming call comes in, then sounds the ringer. You can configure it to autoanswer or answer when you press the dashboard "phone" button.

      If you press the phone button the stereo mutes itself and the phone goes into voice command dialing mode.

      The phone never leaves your pocket, and everything just "works" the way you would want it to. No fooling around with a headset that needs to be charged every night, and clipped to your ear like some cheapo Locutus-of-Borg wannabee.

      --
      John
    3. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by Shag · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm now on my second Bluetooth phone from AT&T, and both have synced just fine with my Macs. I haven't tried using them in a Bluetooth-enabled car, but they're by no means limited to use with headsets, for example.

      This one's a Sony-Ericsson T616; its predecessor was a Nokia 3650, "world phone" but unfortunately AT&T "built out" their network in the rural areas around me using a different GSM frequency band than any of the ones supported by that tri-band phone. (It was 900/1800/1900MHz; they had 900MHz in town, but out of town deployed somewhere around 800-850Mhz. Wankers.)

      Here, Cingular is inheriting a pretty good network; FCC databases show that AT&T's tower count in this county is about double anyone else's. I think some of the others are trying to build out and catch up, so maybe in a few years I'll have other feasible options.

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  9. Re:Biggest in the... by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nope.

    Vodafone.

    They're not in the US. About 6 billion people aren't either.

    (Note: I *AM* in the US. I use Sprint. Commence mocking!)

    --
    "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

    - Seneca
  10. Re:Hmm by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Funny

    If Bell and Telus merged would you call it Belus?

    who can Tell...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  11. AT&T Wireless and Canada calling by cswiii · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My wife (boy, it feels strange to say that) is from Canada, and before we got married, I used to call up there all the time. I recently renewed my contract w/ ATTWS, because as recently as Sept., ATTWS was the only mobile provider I could find that offered a plan allowing the user toll-free calling to .ca and no roaming while there, either. I didn't want to renew after the merger, and risk not having that option available to me.

    It used to be an extra $20 a month, then when I switched to GSM, they'd lowered it to $10. Now I think it's only like $7/mo, which is a real bargain. I think it's called their "North America" plan or something, now.

    Just a heads up for those who might find such a service useful. I've been asking for a few months now at both ATTWS and Cingular stores whether the new company would offer a similar plan, but no one knew for sure.

  12. Re:Clarification Please by vm · · Score: 2, Informative

    AT&T Wireless split from AT&T Corp back in the summer of 2001.

  13. Nothing's changin by Southpaw018 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Cingular and AT&T customers can see what is/isn't changing for them at newcingular.com" It looks like for both services, nothing at all will change except a new name on the AT&T bills (the AT&T customers will get a change if they switch their calling plans). As an ardent cell phone geek, I've spent time with both companies - two years with AT&T, and now going on one with Cingular. Both companies were pretty much the same. Same service (great), same wonderfully geek-satisfying equipment (as opposed to Verizon with some really cheap crappy stuff, wholly absent of Nokia and Sony Ericsson), and almost same plans and prices. Very minor differences even there. The newcingular site claims that the end user will literally sense no change. If that's true, I'm staying with Cingular for a long, long, looooooong time. They already rock.

    --
    ACs are modded -6. I don't read you, I don't mod you, I don't see you. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
    1. Re:Nothing's changin by Mr.+Fusion · · Score: 2, Informative
      It also mentions that Rollover minutes will be made available to current AT&T customers:
      • Plans are already underway to make Rollover Minutes available to you. Please check back on November 10, 2004 for an update. Our goal is to have this feature available to you by this holiday season.
  14. What's Frustrating for Me by johnnyb · · Score: 4, Funny

    What's frustrating for me is that a few weeks before they first announced this, I, having been COMPLETELY FED UP with Cingular and their terrible, possibly unethical billing practices, I decided to drop them mid-contract and signed up w/ AT&T.

    I just can't win.

    1. Re:What's Frustrating for Me by hatefulmofo · · Score: 2, Informative

      ATT Wireless was never much better a company anyway. They're both morally bankrupt companies. I work customer service for ATT Wireless, and for the last 6 months, ATTWS management have been saying nothing but 'renew every single contract you possibly can', customer service be damned.

  15. Great! by jedaustin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now the largest and crappiest network ever!

    I'd be rich if I had a nickel every time someone asked me to call them on a real phone when I was using my ATTWS cell phone.. 'You sound like you're in a tin can!'.

    Lets hope Cingular can bring something better to their service.

  16. Re:Biggest in the... by Zero98aTm · · Score: 2, Informative

    Vodafone owns 44% of Verizon Wireless, so they are in the US. Sort of. In that half-assed sort of way.

  17. I know reading the article is bad form... by philovivero · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...but I couldn't help it. I went to the website and clicked the "I'm an AT&T customer" (I recently left Cingular for AT&T).

    They had a list of bullet points and then a whole page devoted to how much better my life is going to be after this merger. I swear, there were about 64 kilobytes of text devoted to listing all the positives of this merger.

    That's when it struck me that companies really need to read the Cluetrain Manifesto. I really would be interested in the six worst things that are going to happen to me, so that I can be prepared for it.

    Take, for example, when I first signed up with AT&T. Plan: $65/month all told. First bill comes. $300. WTF? Everything that could go wrong, did. They put me on the wrong plans. They didn't count my mobile-to-mobile minutes. They signed me up for about 17 extra plans I didn't need or ask for. Not to mention that "Federal fund recovery fee" which is essentially AT&T's way of saying "How come restaurants get to charge you 15% extra for tips, and we don't??? Oh, wait. We do. We'll just charge a tip on every bill. Nice."

    Now Cingular is going to take this bumblefuck of a corporation and incorporate it into its everyday operations.

    And things are going to go smoothly? I don't think so.

    This is Tweedle-dee meets Tweedle-dum, and they're in charge of your critical wireless communications. Be prepared to be pissed off.

    1. Re:I know reading the article is bad form... by AK+Marc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      IT IS NOT AT&TS WAY OF SAYING THAT THEY JUST WANT FREE MONEY!

      It most certainly is. Sure the costs are real. WalMart doesn't have $6.65 on the box, only to charge you storage fees, parking fees, retail overhead, "government regulation fees" (they pay money directly to Social Security and other fees directly to governemnts). They figure out the cost, advertise $9.88, charge $9.88 (plus tax, if you are in a taxed location) and pay all the fees without bugging you.

      If I were in charge of the FCC (too bad I'm not a general's son), I'd order that all telecom companies include all static (either in $ or %) fees in the advertised price. They shouldn't be allowed to tell you service is $20, then charge you $40 because of all the fees they add in that they blame on the government. It is their cost of business, and the only reason they are separating them out is to be able to advertise or quote lower rates that they are not able to deliver.

  18. AT&T Wireless will re-emerge in the next 6-12 by ApheX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Its worth mentioning that AT&T still owns the rights to the AT&T Wireless name and will re-emerge in the near future as AT&T Wireless but basically reselling Sprint's service.

    Ah! The confusion!

    --

    -
    aphex
    I Steal Music!
  19. Couldn't happen soon enough! by plover · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I, for one, welcome our new Cingular overlords.

    My advice to Cingular on this buyout (if they'd have it?) Completely stomp all AT&T customer-facing EVERYTHING into irretrievable dust, and replace it with Cingular everything. Every drop of software, to the point of formatting any hard drive infested with any AT&T software or marketing. Drop every stupid, confusing plan, and replace it with an equivalent Cingular plan. Burn every marketing brochure, and hang on to the resumes of any former AT&T marketing executive just to ensure they're prominently featured front and center on your blacklist. "Unwanted" posters might not be going too far.

    I have had the CRAPPIEST CUSTOMER SERVICE EVER from AT&T Wireless. Bar none. I have gotten more useful, helpful, timely and factual information from a WalMart greeter. I can't blame the poor salescreature who I bought my phones from. It's their process that is the most horrendous piece of crap application ever devised by a bunch of marketing VPs. I tell you if any coworker of mine were to emit an application as unfriendly as that they'd be gone in a heartbeat, maybe less. This poor lady had to spend 25 minutes PER PHONE to enter a half page of customer information. Tough stuff, like name, address AND ZIP code. To do that, she had to click through literally dozens of pages of options she couldn't explain to me; she misunderstood (and misguided me) about their confusing plethora of plans, and to top it all off, she was one of two people in the store.

    As it was, I waited over an hour just to get to her, then other people had to wait over 90 minutes before my transaction was completed. The reason I don't blame her is when she called the 1-800-DUH number to answer my questions, they couldn't help her either! And she's worked in the store for well over a year. How hard can it be to sell a goddamn phone??? "Push these buttons, pay this amount." God, I'm still burning over that waste of my life.

    As far as customer service on their help lines? I don't think so -- I waited over three hours on hold one night to try to get them to fix the plan the saleslady eventually misclicked. If I wasn't locked in an old contract, I'd have dropped them for T-Mobile in a heartbeat. As it was, after all the headaches were added up it seriously would have been worth my time to pay the $174 they would have charged me for an early switch.

    Technically, I've had very good luck with AT&T. I'd had steadily improving coverage with my PCS phone for the last three years, so I've no complaints with their network. That is, until I got sucked into their GSM plan ("mMode"). My coverage is now a tiny, tiny area immediately surrounding Minneapolis/St. Paul, although even that's been improving over the last four months. Now, if Cingular just has a decent GPRS plan ... well, a fellow can dream, can't he?

    Anyway, when this AT&T contract is up it's "Hello T-Mobile!" and "good riddance to bad rubbish, AT&T Wireless." That is, if Cingular doesn't improve the situation considerably.

    --
    John
  20. Re:Please finish changeover by Oct 31! by Robocrap · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Turn off autoupdate and set it manually to the correct time.

  21. Re:Please finish changeover by Oct 31! by jormurgandr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're not billed by what time the phone thinks it is, but buy by what time the telco computer says it is.

  22. Guarded optimism by trudyscousin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rollover minutes are a fair, humane feature. The equipment both Cingular and AT&T offered has always had that certain geek factor not provided by most other providers (though T-Mobile looks pretty good in that respect).

    The thing is, I've been at Verizon for over two years as a refugee from some truly horrible Cingular service. Specifically, I had terrible luck trying to find an optimal place to use my phone, a problem I haven't had at all with Verizon.

    I'd love to get a Sony/Ericsson Bluetooth phone, something that Verizon just doesn't offer (their Motorola phones' Bluetooth implementation seems to be gimpy). But without decent reception, well, it wouldn't be much of a user experience. I'm going to be watching what develops here closely. If Cingular gets its act back together with regards to reception, sure, I'll go back.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, write technology blogs.
    1. Re:Guarded optimism by WiseWeasel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Note that GSM networks (at least as far as AT&T Wireless is concerned, and now Cingular too apparently) have been dramatically improved this past year. I tried AT&T's GSM service a year and a half ago, and it was so unusable, I had to switch back to their TDMA service for halfway decent reception (and having to give up my sweet Sony-Ericsson phone). As my 1-year contract ended, I switched to AT&T's GSM service a month ago, with a sweet Sony-Ericsson T637 bluetooth phone, and the service now rocks, with excellent reception everywhere, and this phone kicks ass. I will definitely be staying with this GSM service for a long time. The service I get now is worlds better than the TDMA service I had, and the sound quality is unbelievably better. You might do yourself a favor and check out the GSM service again now, as they've really done a huge amount of work on improving their new networks over the past year.

      --
      "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
  23. Re:Cingular already out to make $$$ by Media+Girl · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It's double-talk. The problem is that AT&T phones have been locked into AT&T, so that you cannot take your phone to another carrier. That adds a barrier to switching and enforces loyalty. At least that's the theory. All the carriers do it.

    If I go GSM, I'm definitely going unlocked.

  24. I love it when a plan comes together! by vm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Whatever happened to the reasonable sounding conspiracy theory that AT&T Wireless bungled their CRM upgrade last year in order to sell the company? Upper management overrode their IT dept's plan for a gradual, piecemeal upgrade that would allow fallback and concurrent use of the older rev of Siebel. Instead, they were ordered to whack it in across the board and grab the oh shit handles.

  25. Rural area coverage by mwooldri · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hope that Cingular/AT&T accelerate the roll out of GSM 800 ... otherwise it'll end up being just a city network. One of the main reasons that attracted me to AT&T in the first place is the "old fashioned" TDMA digital network with analog roaming for one single reason: it's more likely to get a signal 'out in the sticks'.

    Now what would be classified as 'out in the sticks'? Try Cherokee, NC. It's nestled in the Grreat Smoky Mountains, is home to a casino, what I would consider a major tourist center. GSM service stops (at least for Cingular) a little west of Asheville. At least I got a single analog dot on the AT&T in analog mode (though most of the time it did say no service). I think things were better with my wife's SprintPCS phone (analog & CDMA) last time she went over.

    Another "Rural" area? Eastern NC and the Outer Banks. There's a whole stretch east of Rocky Mount and west of Manteo that have no GSM service from either Cingular, or AT&T. And Suncom haven't even built their licensed network yet! Down from Nags Head, NC to Ocracoke is another GSM blank spot.

    So the strategy for Cingular/ATTWS IMO for these rural areas needs to be:

    a) roll out GSM800 where possible.
    b) Get a GSM 800/1900 phone with analog out there, and maybe even with CDMA 800/1900 also.

    Mark.

  26. Insider scoop. by BrookHarty · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I run the SGSNs, GGSN's, DHCP and DNS, so I have a nice viewpoint of the merger.

    AWS built out EDGE before Cingular.
    AWS has the larger data network with more coverage.
    AWS has more RAN hardware than cingular.
    AWS launched UMTS, Cingular said they would continue it.
    AWS launched global roaming before everyone else.
    AWS has the largest wap/mmode content around.
    AWS has location based services, wifi, and many other services.
    AWS has many of the fortune 500 companies as customers.

    AWS Hired an outsourcing VP 2 years ago, they ran IT into the ground, crippled customer support. Customer support use to be live, you could get people to fix your issues, it was going the way of automation and lower paid support centers. Then they started forcing contracts and fucked up billing for customers, no wonder usnet has tons of complaints.

    The thing that pissed me off, they ran the company into the ground. Then the CEO's take almost 90 million each, while every employee that bought stock lost money. (Buy at 29, Cingular pays 15)

    Our CEO's hired the worst marketing firm in history, fluffy sheep anyone? I wanted to see a damn van fully loaded with RF gear, pull over and leave the "Can you hear me now" guy in dust. We do drive tests all over. Cant hire enough people quick enough to expand the network. (BTS Vendors, thats a post in itself...)

    Sad, it was a great company they ran into the ground to make CEO money and split. I started there 6 years ago after the mccaw buyout, been in operations ever since.

    Top if off, Cingular has been calling our network substandard to theirs. Who are they joking? I talk to the same freaking vendors...

    I'm not even going to post anonymous.

  27. Can anybody translate this for me? by Se7enLC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok, here are two snippits from the article. Can somebody make sense of them for me?

    #1

    Plans are already underway to make Rollover Minutes available to you. Please check back on November 10, 2004 for an update. Our goal is to have this feature available to you by this holiday season. To get a plan with Rollover, you will need to change to a Cingular Nation® Plan $39.99 or higher. You will also need to get a new Cingular GSM phone.

    #2

    Q: What happens to my existing rate plan?

    A: Rest assured, you will continue to enjoy the benefits of your current rate plan and features.


    Ok, my question is - is it possible to KEEP my at&t plan and get rollover minutes? I don't see how they say I can keep my current rate plan and features when I would have to change plans to get the features they advertise (I would normally have no problem with switching to Cingular...but my att plan has 650 anytime minutes....and I don't think Cingular even offers that).

    ALSO - why on earth do I need a new phone to change how they bill me? the PHONE doesn't bill me (and I'm sure if it did, people would have hacked/phreaked them by now to make free calls)

    1. Re:Can anybody translate this for me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      >why on earth do I need a new phone to change how they bill me?

      Because the billing is done now with four different billing systems, two of which they outsource completely.

      I happen to work at the company that currently does AT&T Wireless. We have an older legacy mainframe system where most of their billing is done, and a newer unix client/server system that they were in the middle of migrating to when this happened.

      The phones are on completely different networks now, and the billing system your service uses is solely determined by that. Until they consolidate their billing by either merging to one system (which takes years) or by enhancing each system to have identical billing features (which could take as long), the only way to get billed by a different system, and get the billing features you want, is to change networks. Some phones can be switched, some can't (you can't take a TDMA phone and switch it to GSM unless you want to be stuck with analog-only service). You may have to get an new phone to move from a AWS network to a Cingular one.

      >the PHONE doesn't bill me

      *sigh*

  28. Hope Cingular realizes not to fuck over IT by gatesh8r · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Remember kids! Never try to move your IT department to India while you're in the middle of a required upgrade forced by the FCC. AT&T Wireless Self-Destructs.

    ...and I'm glad that some AT&T Wireless execs are out of jobs. Maybe they can become a contractor. :P

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
  29. Cingular...pretty sweet, but they have dead zones by MsGeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In Los Angeles, Santa Barbara and San Diego (the only places I've used my T-Mobile GSM phone) connectivity is pretty sweet.

    If I have a T-Mobile GSM phone, why do I know about Cingular's network? Because T-Mobile has had colocation rights on Cingular infrastructure on the West Coast since forever, and because I have an unlocked Euro-Phone (Ericsson r520m) the display identifies the actual network I'm on, not the service provider.

    The only annoyances are that my apartment is under a dead zone, and at the current place that SFVLUG meets, it's also under a dead zone. I have to take a short walk to get to the next tower to place a call.

    You should see some improvement if AT&T starts taking advantage of Cingular's infrastructure. Verizon has a crappy "home" zone for its users (If you call in Santa Barbara and you are an LA user, you get hit with roaming fees) and cuts no deals if you are a Verizon landline customer.

    If you want to switch, go T-Mobile. Easily the geekiest mobile company on the planet, with all-you-can-eat GPRS (mobile internet) or all-you-can-eat "Hot Spot" 802.11b service for $20/month ($40/month for both) if you have a mobile phone with them.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  30. Why is the US mobile market so rubbish? by seraphina · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a genuine question...

    In the UK, calls have been getting cheaper and competition between networks is pretty intense. I think it's like this in most of Europe. So where has the US gone wrong?

  31. AT&T Customer Service NIGHTMARE by lfm_the_couch · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I originally switched to AT&T from Cingular because
    • Cingular's coverage was spotty even in Los Angeles;
    • Outgoing phone calls got dropped about 40% of the time without so much as an error message;
    • Cingular's coverage did not extend north of about San Francisco;
    • The last straw was when I went to a wedding in Arcata and everyone else has AT&T phones, which worked perfectly.
    Technically, as someone else mentioned, AT&T is relatively problem-free. However, I recently got married, so I added my wife's line to my plan and got new GSM phones. WHAT A FREAKIN' NIGHTMARE! AT&T has separate "departments" for individual administrative operations. That is, they have:
    • a "Customer Information Department" which could change her name and address but couldn't move her account under mine and forwarded me to the...
    • ... "Change of Financial Responsibility Department" which could move her account under mine but couldn't sell me a phone so they sent me to the...
    • ... "Sales Department" which couldn't sell me a GSM phone because I hadn't upgraded my account to GSM and forwarded me to the...
    • ... "3G Upgrade Department" which upgraded me to "3G" (sales talk for GSM) and sent me back to the ...
    • ... "Sales Department" which couldn't sell me a GSM phone because they were the "Wireless Sales Department", not the...
    • ... "GSM Sales Department", which DID sell me a phone and to complete the process I was handed to the...
    • ... "Customer Service Department", which could do NOTHING for me because they were actually the "Wireless Customer Service Department" and not the...
    • ... "GSM Customer Service Department", where I at LONG FREAKIN' LAST completed what should have been ONE TRANSACTION WITH ONE CUSTOMER SERVICE REP.
    I therefore heartily agree with the poster who urges Cingular to burn everything associated with AT&T Customer DisService.
  32. Charged coming and going by Media+Girl · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Maybe I'm just too cheap, but $40 to be able to use the phone's full internet capability per month seems pretty outrageous to me, considering that's more than either my cable or DSL bill. Maybe I'm biased because I first saw T-Mobile's WiFi "deal" at a Starbucks in SF; $20/month in a city where WiFi is practically ubiquitous and free struck me as ridiculous.

    If I were to open a coffee shop, the first thing I would do is install WiFi and offer it for free, just to help draw customers. I think Starbucks blew it on this one. All any competitor would have to do is offer free WiFi and Starbucks would lose a signficant part of their coffee-on-the-couch crowd.