Depends... At one time Ford, Mazda, Jaguar and Volvo shared a common platform with their cars and a certain part for a Ford would fit for the Mazda, Volvo, Jaguar, etc. Sometimes the Ford badged component was more expensive than the Jaguar part. Go figure...
Yes we need to keep the LF, MF and HF infrastructure. But we can go digital. A single chip radio that can decode DAB, DRM and HD Radio can be made cheaply... So it wouldn't be a $5 radio, it'd be a $20 radio... but "AM Radio" could go through a digital switchover, spurring deployment of even cheaper radios.
I'd argue that longwave, medium wave and shortwave bands can benefit from going digital. Digital Radio Mondiale was developed specifically for these lower frequencies, to cut through a lot of the noise and make the radio experience on LF, MF and HF more like listening on VHF. Of course there will be propagation issues but digitalization is an answer to some but not all of the problems.
However there is a 1A Right to petition the government.
They don't have to hear you, nor acknowledge you.
But you have the right to send a message to the government and be sure that they get it.
With snail mail, you send a letter with delivery confirmation and the USPS says they delivered it - good enough for 1A. Email - the WH email server says "received your email" - good enough. I call WH, leave a voicemail - good enough. DM th President on Twitter - theoretically good enough... but a Twitter block disrupts this.
If Twitter was the only way to petition the President, and he blocked you from sending your message to him, then it's clearly a violation of 1A. The fact that it is not, and the fact that @realDonaldTrump may not be a government sanctioned channel means we got some wonderful material for some constitutional lawyers to play around with. Twitter could easily knock the sails out of this argument by engineering Twitter itself so that people can choose to receive DMs from people they block in a special "blocked DM" section.
But no-one has a 1A right for the government to rebroadcast their message.
The 1st Amendment does more than protect free speech. It protects religion - freedom of, and freedom from religion.
It also protects the right of people to petition the government, and this is where I believe the constitutional violation may come in - not in freedom to speak itself, but the freedom to petition the government.
Like it or not, Donald J. Trump is a government official. We have a constitutional right to petition him with our grievances. We have a constitutional right to send a message to the government. We are not however, given the right of reply, the right to learn whether the government has acknowledged the receipt of our grievance, nor the right for the government to broadcast our grievance to the public.
So IF @realDonaldTrump is a sanctioned communications channel to a government official, _and_ IF blocking someone on Twitter prevents an American Citizen from "petitioning the government" i.e. Donald. J. Trump (government official), then there is a constitutional argument. If neither is true then there is no constitutional case to answer to.
Answers on a postcard, sent via the United States Postal Service to: Donald J. Trump, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20500. You still have a constitutional right to write and mail a government official, and the USPS will deliver the message. You however have no right of reply.
Here's an article a quick Google search brought up about the F-117 and British radar... from the Los Angeles Times... from 1991. http://articles.latimes.com/19... - and this was using radar considered then to be obsolete, having been "new" in the 1970s. Basically, during Gulf War One, British warships were detecting the location of these stealth fighters at about 40 miles away. From 40 miles out, it is enough time to get your fighter planes in the air to combat the stealth planes. L-band radar may not be precise enough for anti-aircraft weapons on the ground but in combination with air-to-air combat it is good enough - your response just needs to be super fast.
Right now, a lot of commercial broadcasters are abandoning broadcast frequencies below 1.8 Mhz. They're turning off the transmitters and handing in their broadcasting licences to the issuing authorities. In the USA though, some AM broadcasters are successfully acquiring "FM Translator" (relay) stations. Technically the relay/translator station is supposed to re-broadcast the signal of the parent station, but in practice the relay/translator receives a direct feed. It's a way that a broadcaster can get a FM signal where there are no full-power licences available. Other reasons why broadcasters may keep the AM turned on if they got no listeners on the AM frequency is streaming; broadcasters pay less in music royalties than do Internet-only streamers. It's one reason why Pandora purchased a broadcast station.
iBiquity's IBOC and Digital Radio Mondiale's technology could resuscitate the "AM band", particularly in ITU Region 1 (Europe and North Africa) where "long wave radio" still serves large populations with a single high powered transmitter. Music was a main reason why people left AM for FM, so fm-like sound quality on HF, MF and LF bands can make these bands attractive to broadcasters again.
I think that yes, a spinoff featuring Kari, Grant and Tory would be a good idea, and I would also think that they should work under the Mythbusters brand. However given that, I would have no idea what exactly the show would be about with these three. Maybe if Mythbusters is getting back to basics, the spin off could get more serious... show be called "Myth Re-Busters", take certain earlier "plausible" myths and re-do them but using more stringent scientific methods. Leave Adam and Jamie to do the laughs and the bangs. That way people who got too turned off by the presentation and the showmanship of the original series can turn on to something more to their liking... and if the general public are ready for something a bit more serious then ratings shouldn't be a problem either.
I agree on the recaps on one point alone: some features are split up, often with "The Star in the Reasonably Priced Car" segment of the show. When the main feature is returned to, then yes there is a brief recap.
However, on domestic BBC TV, there are no adverts.
Not true. My Google Nexus 5, and my wife's iphone 4S have SIM card slots, with actual SIMS in them. We've been with Sprint in what seems like forever. The SIM is required for the GSM part of the phone to work.
Sounds like a plan to me... a well regulated infrastructure provider providing the "last mile" and different ISPs competing to provide services down this "last mile" (which is owned by the ISP but the infrastructure provider is required to maintain). Mandate the infrastructure company to supply fiber to the premesis as much as is possible. The UK have this kind of arrangement - Openreach runs and maintains the infrastructure, other communications providers purchase use from Openreach. There's no need to make it a government owned company, or even separate the ownership between the incumbent telcos / cablecos. This can be done in the USA, on a regional basis, and ensuring that the "last mile" company is in itself a separate business entity from whoever owns it, even if it is the present incumbent companies.
Some might be skeptical of separation between a "last mile" company and a communications provider when both are owned by the same company. Again, it is regulation that is key. In the financial sector, larger financial companies may own more than one bank but these separate banks have to operate at arms length from one another. Banking regulations make this a requirement. It makes it interesting when the two "banks" are in the same building... an employee of one bank is not to talk about their work or what their bank is doing with employees of the other bank - even though the two banks are owned by the same company and the employees of both banks get their paycheck from the same parent company.
Doctor Who has a number of things going for it. One, it's about fifty years old, so it didn't have an awful lot of television competition. Two, it did build up a cult following over the 1970's and early 1980's. Doctor Who *did* get axed. It got axed because the Controller didn't much care for the show, it got scheduled against Coronation Street (the #1 TV show then in that particular time-slot) and using the excuse of low audience numbers, the axe fell. Though officially the show was "resting".
That cult following actually led to Doctor Who coming back again. Funny when the children who grew up on Doctor who become Television Producers. .
... the Roku channel in question is most certainly not termed as "beta" in any shape or form. Neither is their Android app (can't say about the Apple one, no Apple product here).
I do see the same problems... anytime after 6pm of a weekday evening the Roku app is slow to load, and does crash my Roku (yes, it's a N1000 but it still gives good service for a device that initially came out just for Netflix). The Android app at least is more stable but its interface is quirky and requires some figuring out.
Funimation on Roku - best usability but worst reliability. Funimation on Android - worst usability, best reliability. Funimation on website - balanced between the two.
IMO the Funimation Channel should be taken "private" on Roku until a reliable service is in place. When it works right, then customer satisfaction will be better. But with competitors like Crunchyroll coming along, who knows?
But then I think Funimations' main business is to distribute the shows and to dub (re-version) into English, and make sales on DVD distributions, which is their chief source of income apparently. Obviously streaming isn't their #1 priority. IMO Funimation should get in contact with Amazon and work something out, as Netflix uses Amazon's service to do video distribution.
I'm more concerned whether these data centers will stand up to a Zombie Apocalypse. You know, breaking in, ripping all the wires out...
Seriously, datacenters in NC aren't on the coast. But there is a nuclear power station south of Wilmington, NC that's pretty much on the coast. If *that* is hit by a Category 5 hurricane - then I don't know what would happen.
A nuclear power plant going kaboom is more concerning to me than a datacenter going kaboom.
Depends if your PBS affiliate is carrying it or not. In NC, UNC-TV repackages the PBS Kids shows into its own UNC-TV Kids Channel - all kids, all the time. Other PBS affiliates offer the PBS IQ package which is kids at day, and progressively targets an older audience throughout the day. Some don't at all - the folks in Mississippi don't get IQ, they get Create... not targeted at children. I guess they have a much tighter budget than UNC-TV who operate four channels (3 are over the air, the 4th is exclusive to Time Warner Cable customers). It's not as if there isn't the broadcast bandwidth - Mississippi Public Broadcasting's HD channel is replicated in standard definition. UNC-TV on the other hand does not do this. Its main HD channel is not simulcast over-the-air... ok for end consumers, and if they are watching on an older TV with a converter they can choose to crop or letterbox. For cable/satellite companies they have to make the decision when rebroadcasting UNC-TV on their 4:3 SD channel.
Just tried to go to www.facebook.com - and got a 503 error.
In any case I wonder if there is a way to re-direct email to my so-called facebook email address over to someone else at facebook... or elsewhere for that matter?
It's odd that apple doesn't have apple.co.uk but they have apple.fr, apple.de, apple.se...
In any case ITV plc is a producer of television programming and sells it worldwide, so it has every right to the itv.com domain.
In any case both ITV and the BBC had to pay a lot of money for their names, since they *had* concentrated on.co.uk and realised too late that they needed the.com rights.
Indeed there is. http://www.radiobirdsong.com/ explains all... for those who don't want to follow - birdsong was used as test transmissions before the launch of Classic FM in the UK, and then later on as a filler station on a DAB network. Proved very popular on DAB, its removal resulted in a lot of complaints to No. 10 Downing Street., and estimated listenership of about half a million people.
Things like:
Buses and tube trains terminating before their advertised destination.
Roadworks in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Spokespeople contributing to global warming.
Yep, TfL should give itself an ASBO.
AFAIK French citizens, if wanted by foreign countries, must be tried and sentenced in France according to French law if they are on French soil.
So if you're a French citizen, and you want the best legal protection, stay in France or a French dependent "colony".
IIRC the.us domain was to be used by US State Governments, and.gov was purely federal. The.com, the.net and the.org addresses were to be used by companies, networking operations and organizations in the USA. (.mil by the US military of course)
Plus because of the way the Internet is set up, there are country domains that resolve to servers in the USA.
So blocking out a couple of entire top level domains wouldn't do it.
If Google, Facebook, Amazon et al are going to "go nuclear" it would have to be with geocaching and determining the location of a user by their IP address - if it's in the USA, serve up a SOPA awareness page.... if not, business as usual.
Some of those areas don't have variable electric tariffs that promote use of electricity when the electric company wants you to use the electric.
Here in central NC, most residential customers just have one electrical rate - whatever the electric company wants to charge, and there's no competition.
However because the electric infrastructure around here was built around supplying lots of electric power to the textile mills and they have now been shut down, the power companies have excess capacity here. Datacenters are coming here to fill the void somewhat, but not in terms of raw number of employed people.
But when it comes to electric vehicles the interim solution is for electric companies to offer an "electric vehicle" tariff on a circuit that is controlled by the electric company - and to encourage EV users to charge at times convenient to the electric company. However these charging stations should IMO make use of a dual circuit - giving EV owners the option to give their vehicle a charge boost at peak power pricing, whilst giving the same option of garaging the vehicle overnight to charge when the electric company thinks it can send power to that charging station.
Done on one of the videos at least - flagged it as being illegal for the embedding - asking Youtube if Discovery meant for the embed to be there cos their lawyers are suing their fans who embed the very same videos on their own website.
Slashdot Mirror
Depends ... At one time Ford, Mazda, Jaguar and Volvo shared a common platform with their cars and a certain part for a Ford would fit for the Mazda, Volvo, Jaguar, etc. Sometimes the Ford badged component was more expensive than the Jaguar part. Go figure...
Yes we need to keep the LF, MF and HF infrastructure. But we can go digital. A single chip radio that can decode DAB, DRM and HD Radio can be made cheaply... So it wouldn't be a $5 radio, it'd be a $20 radio... but "AM Radio" could go through a digital switchover, spurring deployment of even cheaper radios.
I'd argue that longwave, medium wave and shortwave bands can benefit from going digital. Digital Radio Mondiale was developed specifically for these lower frequencies, to cut through a lot of the noise and make the radio experience on LF, MF and HF more like listening on VHF. Of course there will be propagation issues but digitalization is an answer to some but not all of the problems.
However there is a 1A Right to petition the government.
They don't have to hear you, nor acknowledge you.
But you have the right to send a message to the government and be sure that they get it.
With snail mail, you send a letter with delivery confirmation and the USPS says they delivered it - good enough for 1A. Email - the WH email server says "received your email" - good enough. I call WH, leave a voicemail - good enough. DM th President on Twitter - theoretically good enough... but a Twitter block disrupts this.
If Twitter was the only way to petition the President, and he blocked you from sending your message to him, then it's clearly a violation of 1A. The fact that it is not, and the fact that @realDonaldTrump may not be a government sanctioned channel means we got some wonderful material for some constitutional lawyers to play around with. Twitter could easily knock the sails out of this argument by engineering Twitter itself so that people can choose to receive DMs from people they block in a special "blocked DM" section.
But no-one has a 1A right for the government to rebroadcast their message.
The 1st Amendment does more than protect free speech. It protects religion - freedom of, and freedom from religion.
It also protects the right of people to petition the government, and this is where I believe the constitutional violation may come in - not in freedom to speak itself, but the freedom to petition the government.
Like it or not, Donald J. Trump is a government official. We have a constitutional right to petition him with our grievances. We have a constitutional right to send a message to the government. We are not however, given the right of reply, the right to learn whether the government has acknowledged the receipt of our grievance, nor the right for the government to broadcast our grievance to the public.
So IF @realDonaldTrump is a sanctioned communications channel to a government official, _and_ IF blocking someone on Twitter prevents an American Citizen from "petitioning the government" i.e. Donald. J. Trump (government official), then there is a constitutional argument. If neither is true then there is no constitutional case to answer to.
Answers on a postcard, sent via the United States Postal Service to: Donald J. Trump, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20500. You still have a constitutional right to write and mail a government official, and the USPS will deliver the message. You however have no right of reply.
"modern" long wavelength radar?
Here's an article a quick Google search brought up about the F-117 and British radar... from the Los Angeles Times... from 1991. http://articles.latimes.com/19... - and this was using radar considered then to be obsolete, having been "new" in the 1970s. Basically, during Gulf War One, British warships were detecting the location of these stealth fighters at about 40 miles away. From 40 miles out, it is enough time to get your fighter planes in the air to combat the stealth planes. L-band radar may not be precise enough for anti-aircraft weapons on the ground but in combination with air-to-air combat it is good enough - your response just needs to be super fast.
Right now, a lot of commercial broadcasters are abandoning broadcast frequencies below 1.8 Mhz. They're turning off the transmitters and handing in their broadcasting licences to the issuing authorities. In the USA though, some AM broadcasters are successfully acquiring "FM Translator" (relay) stations. Technically the relay/translator station is supposed to re-broadcast the signal of the parent station, but in practice the relay/translator receives a direct feed. It's a way that a broadcaster can get a FM signal where there are no full-power licences available. Other reasons why broadcasters may keep the AM turned on if they got no listeners on the AM frequency is streaming; broadcasters pay less in music royalties than do Internet-only streamers. It's one reason why Pandora purchased a broadcast station.
iBiquity's IBOC and Digital Radio Mondiale's technology could resuscitate the "AM band", particularly in ITU Region 1 (Europe and North Africa) where "long wave radio" still serves large populations with a single high powered transmitter. Music was a main reason why people left AM for FM, so fm-like sound quality on HF, MF and LF bands can make these bands attractive to broadcasters again.
So I suppose I'm digital native x10 ???
I think that yes, a spinoff featuring Kari, Grant and Tory would be a good idea, and I would also think that they should work under the Mythbusters brand. However given that, I would have no idea what exactly the show would be about with these three. Maybe if Mythbusters is getting back to basics, the spin off could get more serious... show be called "Myth Re-Busters", take certain earlier "plausible" myths and re-do them but using more stringent scientific methods. Leave Adam and Jamie to do the laughs and the bangs. That way people who got too turned off by the presentation and the showmanship of the original series can turn on to something more to their liking... and if the general public are ready for something a bit more serious then ratings shouldn't be a problem either.
I agree on the recaps on one point alone: some features are split up, often with "The Star in the Reasonably Priced Car" segment of the show. When the main feature is returned to, then yes there is a brief recap.
However, on domestic BBC TV, there are no adverts.
Not true. My Google Nexus 5, and my wife's iphone 4S have SIM card slots, with actual SIMS in them. We've been with Sprint in what seems like forever. The SIM is required for the GSM part of the phone to work.
... oh he said Arial... not Ariel... now if it was a rant against Ariel.... said hearing officer has more problems than just about fonts...
Sounds like a plan to me... a well regulated infrastructure provider providing the "last mile" and different ISPs competing to provide services down this "last mile" (which is owned by the ISP but the infrastructure provider is required to maintain). Mandate the infrastructure company to supply fiber to the premesis as much as is possible. The UK have this kind of arrangement - Openreach runs and maintains the infrastructure, other communications providers purchase use from Openreach. There's no need to make it a government owned company, or even separate the ownership between the incumbent telcos / cablecos. This can be done in the USA, on a regional basis, and ensuring that the "last mile" company is in itself a separate business entity from whoever owns it, even if it is the present incumbent companies.
Some might be skeptical of separation between a "last mile" company and a communications provider when both are owned by the same company. Again, it is regulation that is key. In the financial sector, larger financial companies may own more than one bank but these separate banks have to operate at arms length from one another. Banking regulations make this a requirement. It makes it interesting when the two "banks" are in the same building... an employee of one bank is not to talk about their work or what their bank is doing with employees of the other bank - even though the two banks are owned by the same company and the employees of both banks get their paycheck from the same parent company.
Doctor Who has a number of things going for it. One, it's about fifty years old, so it didn't have an awful lot of television competition. Two, it did build up a cult following over the 1970's and early 1980's. Doctor Who *did* get axed. It got axed because the Controller didn't much care for the show, it got scheduled against Coronation Street (the #1 TV show then in that particular time-slot) and using the excuse of low audience numbers, the axe fell. Though officially the show was "resting".
That cult following actually led to Doctor Who coming back again. Funny when the children who grew up on Doctor who become Television Producers. .
... the Roku channel in question is most certainly not termed as "beta" in any shape or form. Neither is their Android app (can't say about the Apple one, no Apple product here).
I do see the same problems... anytime after 6pm of a weekday evening the Roku app is slow to load, and does crash my Roku (yes, it's a N1000 but it still gives good service for a device that initially came out just for Netflix). The Android app at least is more stable but its interface is quirky and requires some figuring out.
Funimation on Roku - best usability but worst reliability.
Funimation on Android - worst usability, best reliability.
Funimation on website - balanced between the two.
IMO the Funimation Channel should be taken "private" on Roku until a reliable service is in place. When it works right, then customer satisfaction will be better. But with competitors like Crunchyroll coming along, who knows?
But then I think Funimations' main business is to distribute the shows and to dub (re-version) into English, and make sales on DVD distributions, which is their chief source of income apparently. Obviously streaming isn't their #1 priority. IMO Funimation should get in contact with Amazon and work something out, as Netflix uses Amazon's service to do video distribution.
I'm more concerned whether these data centers will stand up to a Zombie Apocalypse. You know, breaking in, ripping all the wires out...
Seriously, datacenters in NC aren't on the coast. But there is a nuclear power station south of Wilmington, NC that's pretty much on the coast. If *that* is hit by a Category 5 hurricane - then I don't know what would happen.
A nuclear power plant going kaboom is more concerning to me than a datacenter going kaboom.
Depends if your PBS affiliate is carrying it or not. In NC, UNC-TV repackages the PBS Kids shows into its own UNC-TV Kids Channel - all kids, all the time. Other PBS affiliates offer the PBS IQ package which is kids at day, and progressively targets an older audience throughout the day. Some don't at all - the folks in Mississippi don't get IQ, they get Create... not targeted at children. I guess they have a much tighter budget than UNC-TV who operate four channels (3 are over the air, the 4th is exclusive to Time Warner Cable customers). It's not as if there isn't the broadcast bandwidth - Mississippi Public Broadcasting's HD channel is replicated in standard definition. UNC-TV on the other hand does not do this. Its main HD channel is not simulcast over-the-air... ok for end consumers, and if they are watching on an older TV with a converter they can choose to crop or letterbox. For cable/satellite companies they have to make the decision when rebroadcasting UNC-TV on their 4:3 SD channel.
Just tried to go to www.facebook.com - and got a 503 error.
In any case I wonder if there is a way to re-direct email to my so-called facebook email address over to someone else at facebook... or elsewhere for that matter?
It's odd that apple doesn't have apple.co.uk but they have apple.fr, apple.de, apple.se ...
In any case ITV plc is a producer of television programming and sells it worldwide, so it has every right to the itv.com domain.
In any case both ITV and the BBC had to pay a lot of money for their names, since they *had* concentrated on .co.uk and realised too late that they needed the .com rights.
Indeed there is. http://www.radiobirdsong.com/ explains all... for those who don't want to follow - birdsong was used as test transmissions before the launch of Classic FM in the UK, and then later on as a filler station on a DAB network. Proved very popular on DAB, its removal resulted in a lot of complaints to No. 10 Downing Street., and estimated listenership of about half a million people.
Things like: Buses and tube trains terminating before their advertised destination. Roadworks in the wrong place at the wrong time. Spokespeople contributing to global warming. Yep, TfL should give itself an ASBO.
AFAIK French citizens, if wanted by foreign countries, must be tried and sentenced in France according to French law if they are on French soil. So if you're a French citizen, and you want the best legal protection, stay in France or a French dependent "colony".
IIRC the .us domain was to be used by US State Governments, and .gov was purely federal. The .com, the .net and the .org addresses were to be used by companies, networking operations and organizations in the USA. (.mil by the US military of course)
Plus because of the way the Internet is set up, there are country domains that resolve to servers in the USA.
So blocking out a couple of entire top level domains wouldn't do it.
If Google, Facebook, Amazon et al are going to "go nuclear" it would have to be with geocaching and determining the location of a user by their IP address - if it's in the USA, serve up a SOPA awareness page.... if not, business as usual.
Some of those areas don't have variable electric tariffs that promote use of electricity when the electric company wants you to use the electric. Here in central NC, most residential customers just have one electrical rate - whatever the electric company wants to charge, and there's no competition. However because the electric infrastructure around here was built around supplying lots of electric power to the textile mills and they have now been shut down, the power companies have excess capacity here. Datacenters are coming here to fill the void somewhat, but not in terms of raw number of employed people. But when it comes to electric vehicles the interim solution is for electric companies to offer an "electric vehicle" tariff on a circuit that is controlled by the electric company - and to encourage EV users to charge at times convenient to the electric company. However these charging stations should IMO make use of a dual circuit - giving EV owners the option to give their vehicle a charge boost at peak power pricing, whilst giving the same option of garaging the vehicle overnight to charge when the electric company thinks it can send power to that charging station.
Done on one of the videos at least - flagged it as being illegal for the embedding - asking Youtube if Discovery meant for the embed to be there cos their lawyers are suing their fans who embed the very same videos on their own website.