Slashdot Mirror


AOL Files First Spim Lawsuit

Iphtashu Fitz writes "CNet News is reporting that 4 major internet providers - AOL, Earthlink, Microsoft, and Yahoo, have filed another bunch of lawsuits against spammers. What makes this round interesting is that AOL has filed the first ever lawsuit against against spam that targets Instant Messenger clients, or spim. So far spim has only affected relatively small numbers of users but the problem is growing, which is why AOL is targeting it now."

21 of 234 comments (clear)

  1. Spim? by neonfrog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is that Italian Spam?

    --

    I'm thinking about it, therefore I might be.

    1. Re:Spim? by Mike+Rubits · · Score: 5, Informative

      Spam + IM (instant messanging) = SPIM.

    2. Re:Spim? by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 4, Funny

      I guess it's a good thing it's instant messaging and not Electronic Relay Messaging

  2. I never had a problem with spim by riceboy50 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's kind of a cool MIPS emulator, but maybe AOL just couldn't figure out how to work it. :-)

    --
    ~ I am logged on, therefore I am.
  3. Hmmm? by Emperor+Tiberius · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is Spim the low fat version of Spam?

  4. Must...overcome...AOL...prejudice... by YetAnotherName · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When *@aol.com first started appearing on newsgroups I thought AOL would just be a minor nuisance, like a hangnail. Then I got *@aol.com in my email box like there was no tomorrow, and nuisance turned into genuine pain in the neck, like a cancer.

    But slowly and surely, AOL has done much to both transform themselves and the user populace into better Internet citizens ... and I can't help but think that they've affected the genre tenor of the Internet as a whole in the process.

    So now that they're taking a pre-emptive strike against spim, I have to applaud.

    1. Re:Must...overcome...AOL...prejudice... by tgeller · · Score: 5, Informative

      AOL has a long history of suits against spammers. See this list of litigation they've filed.

      Pity they often place themselves on the wrong side of legislative battles, though. They were a driving force behind the CAN-SPAM Act, which guarantees the right to send unsolicited, commercial, bulk email.

      --
      Tom Geller
    2. Re:Must...overcome...AOL...prejudice... by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny
      "But slowly and surely, AOL has done much to both transform themselves and the user populace into better Internet citizens"

      True, but they are still the trailer park of the internet.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    3. Re:Must...overcome...AOL...prejudice... by nomadic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      AOL's ability to hold onto subscribers who moved to broadband is awe-inspiring. I mean, they're basically charging people $20 a month for almost nothing. AND PEOPLE PAY. It's kind of like at the end of The Usual Suspects when you say to yourself "wow, that guy is so evil....but damn is he smooth." I think my expectations of the world have become so downgraded that I don't even mind evil, as long as it's halfway competent evil.

  5. Glad to see they're acting now by Mike+Rubits · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All I have to say is THANK GOD. ICQ was destroyed by spam for many people, and AIM is heading down that path.

  6. buyer problem by Coneasfast · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the real problem lies in the fact that spammers have an incentive to send spam. if nobody would buy penis enlargement pills, accept online mortgages, and order medicine online, we wouldn't have this problem.

    one way to combat this problem is look from the other end, we should educate the public and discourage people from doing any business with online sellers. consumers should be suspicious when such emails appear. i personally think this would help reduce spam

    --
    Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
    1. Re:buyer problem by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Insightful

      **if nobody would buy penis enlargement pills, accept online mortgages, and order medicine online, we wouldn't have this problem.**

      not really, that's false.

      all you need is an ILLUSION, a THOUGHT, someone just needs to _believe_ that it would work, then we're going to have the problem.

      so.. someone starts to spam, for whatever reason, like there's no tomorrow.. if he makes money or no doesn't matter for some other scumbags to believe that "hey, he must be doing money, otherwise why would he have done this? I GOTTA GET ON THIS BOAT!" and the circle is sure to continue. like the biggest chain letter of all time.

      I'd be very surprised if spamming worked for other than like 1 % of the spammers. like mlm, 99% are just going to end up loosing money.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  7. Minty Pythin's Flying Circis by Bloater · · Score: 4, Funny

    Spim, Spim, Spim, Spim, ...

  8. AOL sue for.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    junk? How SPAM/SPIM/SPEM/SPOM/SPUM (and sometimes SPYM) much different than them sending millions of AOL CDs in the mail every year?

  9. In One Day... by Duncan3 · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is AOL's stats, so far today - and it's only 3PM here on the west coast.

    SPAM Blocked Today:
    846,170,968

    This month:
    33,661,697,872

    Instant Messages
    Sent Today:
    1,151,202,297

    Members Online Now:
    2,410,612

    You can watch the numbers on http://www.corp.aol.com/

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
  10. Spim? by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    Who do I talk to about these stupid names? It should be imSpam

    imSpam, spam i am
    i'd like to sell you
    c1al1s and a s3x cam

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  11. It's spim, not spam by spuzzzzzzz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Anyone who accuses the authors of misspelling spam is officially a fool and deserves to lose their geek license. Spim is a word, people. Look it up.

    --

    Don't you hate meta-sigs?
  12. spim? by dotgod · · Score: 4, Insightful

    why do we have to make up nicknames for everything? can't we just call it instant messenger spam? jeez.

  13. Two Wrongs.... by Tsali · · Score: 3, Funny

    What makes this round interesting is that AOL has filed the first ever lawsuit against against spam

    Okay - against against spam? Are we in Newspeak now where it is double-plus ungood instant messenging? Is it for spamming now?

    It's AOL, so I'm not sure which side of the marketing wagon I should be riding on.

    --
    This space for rent.
  14. Sue Themselves? by Ranger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    AOL will not sue themselves. After all AIM is loaded with their own unwanted advertising and popups.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  15. How To by RichM · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This'll probably get me modded down, but I was once asked to create a spim Perl script for somebody (for money) and here's the source:

    #!usr/bin/perl
    if ($ENV{'REQUEST_METHOD'} eq 'GET')
    {
    @pairs = split(/&/, $ENV{'QUERY_STRING'});
    }
    elsif ($ENV{'REQUEST_METHOD'} eq 'POST')
    {
    read (STDIN, $buffer, $ENV{'CONTENT_LENGTH'});
    @pairs = split(/&/, $buffer);
    if ($ENV{'QUERY_STRING'})
    {
    @getpairs = split(/&/, $ENV{'QUERY_STRING'});
    push(@pairs,@getpairs);
    }
    }
    else
    {
    print "Content-type: text/html\n\n";
    print "Use the POST or GET methods."; }
    foreach $pair (@pairs) { ($key, $value) = split (/=/, $pair);
    $key =~ tr/+/ /; $key =~ tr/+/ /;
    $key =~ s/%([a-fA-F0-9][a-fA-F0-9])/pack("C", hex($1))/eg;
    $value =~ tr/+/ /; $value =~ s/%([a-fA-F0-9][a-fA-F0-9])/pack("C",
    hex($1))/eg ;
    $value =~ s///g; if ($formdata{$key}) { $formdata{$key} .= ", $value";
    }
    else { $formdata{$key} = $value; } } 1;
    print "Content-type: text/html\n\n";
    print "Sent message from $formdata{'sendername'}, to
    $formdata{'recipient'}!";
    use lib '.';
    use Net::AIM;
    $aim = new Net::AIM;
    $conn = $aim->newconn (Screenname => $formdata{'sendername'},
    Password => $formdata{'password'});
    foreach my $i (0..4) {
    $aim->do_one_loop || last;
    sleep 1;
    }
    $aim->send_im ( $formdata{'recipient'},$formdata{'message'});
    sle ep 1;
    print "";

    It takes the following variables:
    $sendername, $password (for AOL login), $recipient and $message by either POST or GET.
    I kinda regret doing it now but it paid the rent at the time...