Slashdot Mirror


Return of the Jedi DVD Detailed Changes

JSDopefish writes "The DVD news site DVDanswers.com is back with its final installment (3 of 3) of the series by Chris Gould showing in detail the changes between some the various iterations of the Star Wars original trilogy movies. Chris has screen captures from the original, the 1997 remaster, and the 2004 DVD versions, plus some audio clips for you to check out. One of the best lists of changes, mostly because of the pictures. Some of the changes listed here are The Sarlacc monster, Lightsaber consistency (again), as well as new things like even more celebrations added to the end, and an appearance by Hayden Christensen. There is an existing Part 1 covering A New Hope, and a Part 2 that covers The Empire Strikes back as well."

47 of 166 comments (clear)

  1. RoTJ v2.0 ?? by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 4, Funny

    Or is this still a sub-release?

  2. To prempt all the "Who shot first" questions... by Viceice · · Score: 2, Informative
    From the article:

    You'll note the use of quotation marks here, and this is because this scene stands alongside Greedo shooting first and Jabba's appearance in A New Hope as one of my hated alterations.


    So there.

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
  3. Return of the Slashdotted Server by castlec · · Score: 3, Funny

    need i say more?????

    --
    When I tell an object to delete this, am I killing it or telling it to kill me?
    1. Re:Return of the Slashdotted Server by onion2k · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not at all. I work with Mal who authors the DVDanswers site. The server is mighty busy at the moment, but hes cleverly made the code automatically switch over to the lower bandwidth, non-dynamic, advert laiden version when the traffic increases beyond a particular threshold.

      When your site gets slashdotted 3 times in a couple of months you're prompted to take such measures.

  4. Hated End Part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The worst change by far is the adding of Hayden Christiansen to the 3 ghosts Luke sees at the end of the movie. Obi Wan didn't look like Ewan McGregor after he died, why did they make Anakin look like Hayden? Awful.

    1. Re:Hated End Part by astrokid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I believe the official answer to this is because Lucas wanted to represent the Jedi Spirit as they where when they died. Since Christiansen was young when he went over to the Dark Side the younger version was put in. That's why Obi Wan isn't represented by Ewan McGregor.

      --

      Chewie does not get a medal. Come on, George. Can a Wookie get a medal?
    2. Re:Hated End Part by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The corollary to that is that Darth Vader redeemed himself before he died (by heaving the Emperor into a big hole) and therefore he *should* appear as the Sebastian Shaw version of Anakin.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    3. Re:Hated End Part by ALeavitt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Supposedly, the logic behind Anakin looking like Hayden Christiansen rather than Sebastian Shaw (who played the unmasked Anakin) is that the Jedi ghosts would appear as a light Jedi did at death. When Anakin became Darth Vader, the good Jedi who was Anakin was destroyed. Therefore, from a certain point of view, when Anakin "died" he looked like Hayden Christiansen, hence the ghost of Hayden.

      --
      This sig has been stolen. Return it to its original user for a reward.
    4. Re:Hated End Part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      But again, why would Luke even recognize the young Anakin as his father?

      Chess_the_cat. Banned. Again.

    5. Re:Hated End Part by Minwee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Shouldn't there be two ghosts then, one for the good young Anakin who dies in Episode III and one for the good older Anakin who died in Jedi?

    6. Re:Hated End Part by blowdart · · Score: 4, Funny
      I believe the official answer to this is because Lucas wanted to represent the Jedi Spirit as they where when they died.

      That may be the official answer, but of course we all know that the real answer is "Well we changed it because we can, and when we release an 'original' DVD set in a couple of years everyone will rush out and buy it again. Then Lucas will finally have enough money to get a custom made real doll shaped like jar jar."

    7. Re:Hated End Part by aztektum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But Vader was pulled back to the lightside before his death, hence his throwing the Emperor into the dark abyss.

      It still stinks.

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    8. Re:Hated End Part by Liselle · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I usually post this comment as AC whenever /. covers Lucas and his treatment of the original trilogy, but today the mods can spend some points elsewhere. It's a quote from the introduction of Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley:
      "Chronic remorse, as all the moralists are agreed, is a most undesirable sentiment. If you have behaved badly, repent, make what amends you can and address youself to the task of behaving better next time. On no account brood over your wrongdoing. Rolling in the muck is not the best way of getting clean.

      Art also has its morality, and many of the rules of this morality are the same as, or at least analogous to, the rules of ordinary ethics. Remorse, for example, is as undesirable in relation to our bad art as it is in relation to our bad behaviour. The badness should be hunted out, acknowledged and, if possible, avoided in the future. To pore over the literary shortcomings of twenty years ago, to attempt to patch a faulty work into the perfection it missed at its first execution, to spend one`s middle age in trying to mend the artistic sins committed and bequeathed by that different person who was oneself in youth - all this is surely vain and futile. And that is why this new `Brave New World` is the same as the old one. Its defects as a work of art are considerable; but in order to correct them I should have to rewrite the book - and in the process of rewriting, as an older, other person, I should probably get rid not only of some faults of the story, but also of such merits as it originally possessed. And so, resisting the temptation to wallow in artistic remorse, I prefer to leave both well and ill alone and to think about something else."
      Honestly, it requires no further commentary.
      --
      Auto-reply to ACs: "Truly, you have a dizzying intellect."
    9. Re:Hated End Part by micromoog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yup. I reread Brave New World recently, and couldn't help but think "Greedo shoots first" when reading that introduction.

    10. Re:Hated End Part by tuffy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The idea's really childish and stupid.

      Yes, but Lucas did say that he was trying to bring the original films more in-line with the prequels. He's just adding consistency by making all of it really childish and stupid.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    11. Re:Hated End Part by nine-times · · Score: 2, Insightful
      BTW, do you think after WW2 there were any Nazis left in Germany? They just quickly hid their uniform and stated they had always been against the empire...

      If Hitler had been killed during a random battle, mid-war, when Germany was still generally doing well, do you think they would have been throwing a big party in Berlin with fireworks and yelling "Yea! We're free!"?

    12. Re:Hated End Part by hesiod · · Score: 3, Funny

      > why would Luke even recognize the young Anakin as his father?

      Dude... he's got the force. He just, like, knows, man!

    13. Re:Hated End Part by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why would Luke recognize ANYONE as his father. He was never around. Face it, Anakin was a dead beat dad. Even when they did meet, he beat up his son and shot his daughter up with drugs. Sounds like a Springer family to me.

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
  5. Re:Can you still get the original trilogy? by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 5, Informative

    I believe there is a .torrent floating around that was ripped from the original laserdiscs, all ready for burning to DVD.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  6. Good job by smooth+wombat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A very good job going over each scene, describing the differences and a short opinion as to like/dislike.

    His review should be the first place people go to when deciding whether to buy the 2004 release.

    Of course, I still haven't seen the second prequel but then the ads didn't impress me that much so maybe I'm not missing anything.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  7. Re:Can you still get the original trilogy? by nearlygod · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's a great idea. How come no one else has asked for this? Does any one have Lucas' number?

    --
    The Tools Of Ignorance wanna be a tool?
  8. Another Site... by jmcmunn · · Score: 3, Informative

    In case of Slashdotting, here is another site with all three of the movies and their changes.

    http://www.thedigitalbits.com/reviews3/starwarscha nges02.html

    Want a free Xbox or Slim PS2? Click below.

  9. What he doesn't notice. by gowen · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's quite a good run through but theres one thing he's missed. The reason all the vibrancy has been removed from the lightsabres is for added consistency ... with the dialogue.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  10. Re:Can you still get the original trilogy? by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just give these latest editions a few years to run through the sales cycle, and we'll see a "Mega-Diamond Director's Special Blend Extra Virgin Original Version" wherein you not only get the original films but also the ability to insert your own face on top of characters in the movie, including the family dog as Chewie.

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  11. Re:Can you still get the original trilogy? by hal2814 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The original VHS version will be out on DVD (or whatever the popular format is at that point) when Lucas dies and his estate cashes in by making money anywhere they can (see the estate of Charles Atkins or Philip K Dick for examples).

  12. The biggest change is... by Xpilot · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...this time, Endor shoots first. Making the whole Rebel attack unnecessary. So to fill in for the gap, Lucas decided to put in an hour of digital dancing Ewoks, to make the film "more in line with the prequels"

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
  13. Re:Can you still get the original trilogy? by castlec · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    When I tell an object to delete this, am I killing it or telling it to kill me?
  14. Steal them... by wickedj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, I have half a mind to buy some bootleg DVDs of the original trilogy out of Hong Kong. If Lucas is intent on stealing my childhood, I might as well steal them back.

    I understand his need for perfection. I like to go back and tweak old code I've written. But not if millions of people are already adore the originals. If I were him, I would have at least left the option to have the original cuts on the DVDs.

  15. Re:Can you still get the original trilogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    And people say piracy is a bad thing...

  16. The Sarlacc by 10Ghz · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Here we have a shot of Luke Skywalker standing over the Great Pit of Carkoon, nesting place of the all-powerful Sarlacc. The creature is basically a gigantic mouth, with rows of inwardly facing teeth and a number of sticky tentacles that it uses to snare unsuspecting prey."

    Oh come on! It looks like an anus! You know it, and I know it!

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  17. Slashdot version? by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Slashdot Version
    Please note this is a heavily cut down version due to heavy load from Slashdot traffic. We have also added extra adverts to cover bandwidth charges. To visit the standard site click HERE.


    Ok.. so you took away some of the content and added more advertisements? That's a great way to STILL GET SLASHDOTTED.

    If your site's dead, you don't get ad revenue.

  18. Re:who cares by aacool · · Score: 4, Funny
    I wish Kevin Smith would do a DVD on the Star Wars DVD set - his riffs on Star Wars in his films are just marvelous

    I know he's supposed to be making a Star Wars TV Series, but that still won't compare to thoughts on Contract Labor on the Death Star, Silent Bob trying to pick up the tape through the use of the force and so many other references.

    Film-crit is a time-honored tradition - DVD-crit is more recent, and possibly debatable.

  19. WHAT??? by julesh · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here it is in all it's glory, complete with Gungans shouting 'Wesa free!'...

    I could just about tolerate everything else he's done to it, but that's the limit.

  20. Re:Can you still get the original trilogy? by fr2asbury · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One question about those. Were the movies touched up at all for the laserdisc? I've seen those and in my old VHS copy I could see through parts of the speeders on Hoth, as in looking from the cockpit if it flew by a walker you could see the legs of the walker right through the bar at the side of the window. Also in space I could usually see colored boxes around the Tie Fighters and probably other space ships. In the rips from the laserdiscs I don't see any of that.
    Contentwise it is original though.

  21. you know you're cool when... by torrents · · Score: 5, Funny

    you participate in the slashdotting of a star wars site...

    what's even worse is if you use that achievement as a pickup line...

    --
    Get your torrents...
  22. forking Lucas! by gosand · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Or is this still a sub-release?

    I think it is clearly a fork.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  23. Re:Can you still get the original trilogy? by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In many interviews, the "fucked" versions are what George wanted the movie to be, but couldn't do it given the time/money constraints.

    Then he's less of a genius than thousands of SciFi fanboys have made him out to be these last 20-odd years...

  24. Close to reality.... by gosand · · Score: 3, Informative
    and now he's a powerful Jedi!

    So Cheney is the emperor, Rumsfeld is JarJar, and in a few years one of Bush's twins will rise up and eventually destroy him. Uncanny.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  25. Re:WTF!!! by dosius · · Score: 2, Funny

    And Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia.

    Moll.

    --
    What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
  26. The shadows are wrong by Jim+Hall · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wish when they re-did ROTJ for the DVD release, someone at ILM noticed that the shadows are completely wrong on the Tatooine segment where Jabba's sail barge moves flys across the dunes.

    Look at this photo

    Note that on the sail barge, the light source is somewhere forward and to the left.

    Look at the dunes in the background. The light source is clearly somewhere behind and to the left.

    Well, I suppose Tattooine does have two suns. They're special - one sun only illuminates ships, the other only illuminates natural landscapes. :-)

    1. Re:The shadows are wrong by FlopEJoe · · Score: 3, Funny
      "The light source is clearly somewhere behind and to the left."

      That's behind... and to the left.

      Behind... and to the left.

      Behind... and to the left.

      Behind... and to the left.

      ...

  27. I see what you're getting at... by jaraxle · · Score: 2, Funny

    but really, if that's what they've looked like in your experience, you are SERIOUSLY going to the wrong bars to pick up chicks.

    Either that, or you need to get your woman some serious antibiotics! ;)

    ~jaraxle

  28. Did everyone forget the old Jedi Mantra by R.Caley · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ``Don't think, feel!!!!''

    What you're supposed to feel is an iresistable desire to run and get your parents to buy you some merchandising.

    If only Lucas hadn't made the mistake of getting a real director to make the second/fifth one, no one would be confused into thinking these were movies rather than adverts.

    --
    _O_
    .|<
    The named which can be named is not the true named
  29. Re:Ewoks... by Flibz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, but ultimately isn't it a kids film?

    That's not a criticism. I've heard some newer films slated for not meeting expectations lately: -

    Alien V Predator - Fun film, no content, no oscar winning performances. Who cares? I, for one, wasn't expecting Shakespearean quality acting and depth of plot.

    Van Helsing - Disappointing because I expected something with more calibre and got appalling dialogue. If I'd been expecting it I wouldn't care. But I wasn't.

    Scooby Doo - appalling film, based on a fairly bad (totally out of ideas) cartoon. Both enjoyable.

    My advice, know your movie. Don't go to watch "Cat in the Hat", whilst expecting to see "Last Passion of the Christ". You're only ever going to be disappointed...

  30. Re:re-re mastering by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    "George Lucas is your re-master now, he will show you the true meaning of the edit."

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  31. Sy Snootles controversy! by minotaurcomputing · · Score: 2, Funny

    At the beginning of Jedi Rocks you can clearly hear Sy Snootles' voice while her microphone is still being heald at her side! Clearly evidence that she is jaggarm-synching.
    -m

  32. On the so-called "audio change"... by mark-t · · Score: 2, Interesting
    During the scene where Han shoots the Sarlacc's tentacle away from Lando, I think there musta been multiple releases of this or something...

    The first time I saw it in the theatre, I most distinctly remember Han saying "trust me" to Lando when he was about to shoot (as Han was recovering from hibernation sickness and was blind up until this point). I remember this because by this time in Harrison Ford's career, that line had become something of a trademark for him (sorta like Schwartzenegger's "I'll be back" line).

    The second time I saw it in the theatre, and in fact every time I saw it in the theatre after that, the line was changed to a not entirely confidence inducing line of "It's all right, I can see a lot better now." Again, this struck me distinctly because of the association I had made with Harrison for to the "Trust me" line.

    When I bought Jedi on VHS, Han said the "I can see a lot better now" line. Yet when I bought the remastered version on VHS (still original), several years later, the line was back to "Trust me".

    Then when I saw saw the "Special edition" in the theatre, the line was again, "Trust me". It was "Trust me" every time I saw it in the theatre.

    When I bought the VHS of the special edition, the line was again, suddenly back to the "I can see a lot better now" version.

    So... I dunno what the heck is going on, and I probably never will... I'll just sit back and enjoy the story anyways.