AOL Dumping Some Broadband
unsupported writes "Just days after news that AOL will be breaking up into 4 business units, AOL is telling existing broadband customers in 9 Southern states to find a new carrier. This news comes after AOL stopped selling broadband services earlier this year. AOL plans a similar phase out of existing broadband customers for the rest of the country over the next year."
AOL has been losing customers like crazy - in this case, they just have an alternate reason to leave!
Do you think that the people getting dumped will also receive CDs offering 3 months free dial-up with AOL? I'd be pissed.
This doesn't make much sense to me. Doesn't the Time Warner half want to push hi-bandwidth content through to its AOL subscribers? It's much more difficult to do this via 56k. I really don't know much about the merger other than it's not doing so well. But it seems like the two sides aren't really talking.
The reason [aside from the fact that they suck and really amount to traveling the information super highway with training wheels dragging] we dropped our AOL subscription was their incessant advertising to get us to upgrade to aol broadband which they have never delivered in my area. Broadband did become available [some neighborhoods get DSL, we have comcast cable internet pretty much throughout my metro area]. Bottom line: Broadband is killing AOL in my part of New England. If Aol is dumping broadband, its going to hurt them badly in the long run. Even if BB service is costly for them to set up...everybody else [e.g. comcast] raises their rates and gets away with it...breaking even later is better than having no customers.
SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
So, this means AOL customers might have to switch to RoadRunner?
From the article:
Most of AOL's 23 million subscribers receive standard dialup service for $24 a month.
Why would they get rid of most of their customers? Undoubtedly, this is a decision based on the ROI. Sure, their revenues per subscriber might be higher for broadband, but dial-up may have a higher profit per subscriber.
Because selling the content as an add-on to existing broadband services (Comcast, Verizon DSL, etc) is more lucrative than running their own native ISP.
Sounds like a smart move to me.
I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
-AOL buys Netscape (possibly to cash-in on the lawsuit against Microsoft)
-AOL buys Nullsoft (maybe AOL wants their own branded media player)
-AOL signs contract with Microsoft to use IE browser (instead of using Netscape's browser that they paid 4.2 billion for)
-AOL lays off Netscape crew, but decides to fund Mozilla
-AOL is shutting down Nullsoft
-AOL is getting out of the broadband ISP business.
Has AOL done anything good in the last few years? What the hell was Time Warner thinking?
-Nick
"A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
Comment removed based on user account deletion
When I think about early broadband access, I think about how it was nice to have an account on a smaller ISP. But then without any warning at all they get gobbled up by a bigger ISP. Sometimes they went under and sold their customers to EarthLink for example, other times they got an offer they couldn't refuse. While this was frustrating, you at the very least didn't typically notice any downtime.
Why wouldn't AOL sell off their unwanted customer base to someone else?
There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.