Slashdot Mirror
Hitchhikers Movie Update
DaViking writes "Over at Yahoo Movies there are a few more pictures, including one of the Heart of Gold, and an updated trailer for up coming Hitchhikers movie." I'm hoping this film will inspire some sequels, too!
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
Am I the only one who gets an image of Charlie Brown when looking at art of Marving looking down at a barren landscape? Weird :)
Whatever happened to a "space age running shoe sleekness"?
:D
However, on a positive note, that spacecraft does look like it's from a Douglas Adams novel
-- n
It seems that spheres are going to be a very common shape in this movie, With Planets, The Hart of Gold that looks like a big sphere, and Marvins head which is a huge sphere on a little body. I don't know about everyone else all those sphears seem more of a nineties thing. The 2000 seem to prefer more edges in the style.
If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
"Marvin the depressed robot"? WTF? He's Marvin the Paranoid Android. I know he is a robot who is depressed, but sheesh he is, was, and always will be the paranoid android.
If they can't even get that right... let's hope its just the phone sanitizers at Yahoo who made the mistake and not the movie's writer(s).
Sailing over the event horizon
Comment removed based on user account deletion
We're calling for a sequel because H2G2 is the first in a series of five books. It's natural for fans of the books to want the whole series to be made.
Yea, they can't even get the plain written facts of the story right, I'd be terrified what Disney is going to mangle the story into if I planned to watch it. Me, I have the DVD set from the BBC. Even if they did get the story right I'm just not sure the story will benefit from a major cgi driven Hollywood remake.
Democrat delenda est
>it was never designed to be a film
the fact Douglas Adams himself worked on a version of the script seems to suggest otherwise.
I love HHGTTG and probably will go see it just for that, but it looks like Disney is tring to make it into a kids movie. Just look at Marvin. (Mod me down if you want) but it saddens me that Disney is making this movie. I fear that they might try to "clean" up the movie.
Um, all YOU have is concept art. Dumb ass.
I'm sick of these elitist "guardians" of their prized, beloved geekdom.
Guess what? Douglas Adams was working on this movie for YEARS, so clearly the creator and author thought it was "ameneable for conversion." People thought it wouldn't work as a novel since it was a radio series first. Well, it did work as a novel. Now we're seeing the fulfillment of Adams' desire to make a film version.
It'll work as a movie too. If you don't like that, DON'T WATCH THE FILM. You've still got the book and radio series. It won't be a disappointment. I have a feeling it's going to be a hilarious film.
I think Dent Arthur Dent was played really well and the jokes well timed. I still prefer the books (and to my shame, have never heard the radio version).
Wasn't the Heart of Gold supposed to be shaped like a giant sneaker?
Ok, repeat after me. It is a mass media oriented movie adaptation of a non visual original that appealed only to a niche market.
Changes will have to be made in order to make it marketable and profitable. Kids will want to see it, and they will not understand the humour, so they will need cutesy characters. Many non intelectual types will expect more explosions and COOL effects than required so they will be there. The ships will be of a more recognizable shape so that the average moviegoer doen't say "A sneaker! This is lame". And so on...
If I don't get another Battlefield Earth I will be more than happy with the movie. And only if it makes a profit we will get a sequel.
Cheers, Adolfo
How can it be "wrong"? If that's what it looks like in the movie, then it is absolutely not wrong.
To be more precise, the movie is not the book. The book is not the radio play. The radio play is not the tv series. And the tv series is most definitely not the Infocom text adventure game.
If I recall correctly, in the radio play and tv series, the characters went to Milliways before they got to Magrathea. In the books, Milliways happened in the second book, with Magrathea happening in the first. Definite contradiction there. In the books, Trillian is clearly described as being brunette and extremely intelligent. In the tv series she was a dumb ditzy blonde. In the movie, Ford Prefect is black. In the tv series, he was white.
Douglas Adams always changed things up when the story went from one medium to another. There is no right or wrong in telling the H2G2 story. The story simply is whatever it is in whatever medium you happen to be experiencing it in. In this medium, the Heart of Gold is a ball. In the book, it was a shoe. If you want the shoe version, read the book. But this isn't the book, it's the movie, and it will differ, even contradict, the other versions -- which, by the way, frequently contradict each other already. This is nothing new. It's the way it has always been in the universe of H2G2.
"You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein
How do you know Disney came up with the new Heart of Gold? Adams put many years into planning this movie. A lot of people involved with it right now are personal friends of his. Maybe this was his vision.
All I'm saying is that I'm not going to immediately jump on Disney for "ruining" this simply because parts of it, or even most of it if that's the case, differ from the previous versions. I'm going to go see the movie and enjoy it for what it is. It's not the book, and it's not the radio play. It's the movie. And it will be different.
"You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein
The crucial difference is that when Adams introduced anything new, he went to extraordinary lengths to make sure it was just right and, crucially, extremely funny. We know that he went through countless revisions of all his work, attempting to get it "just so".
Now we've got some unknown twit messing with the details for no good reason. If I wanted to see the musings of this nobody, I would have bought their books instead.
Changing the details from those established by the original author just for the hell of it is WRONG, especially when the original author isn't able to protest.
How would the LOTR movies have fared if they'd just decided to, oh I don't know, make all the hobbits 7 feet tall, say? Just for the hell of it? How many very pissed off people would that have resulted in?
So in other words, if they release a new sequel to MIB, and call it H2G2, that's ok, because the movie is not the book? A certain amount of continuity is necessary: Zaphod must have three arms and two heads, Marvin must be an electronic sulking machine, Vogons must be green, the mice must escape, and someone's arm must be bruised.